With the LTTE using thousands of child soldiers,who is to identify a non-combatant child from a combatant child? The IPKF in the north allegedly suffered many casualties thanks to LTTE child soldiers ,masquerading as innocents in civilian clothing.Who will weep tears for the Indian soldiers killed by the LTTE?
The tears being wept for Pol Pot Prabhakaran's son are of the crocodile nature by disgraced,defeated,venal,corrupt Tamil politicos each trying to score brownie points off each other .Where was the great Kalaignar when Prabhakaran was in his last days,desperately seeking to be saved? At least the firang western foreign ministers of Britain and France flew to Colombo to try and save the top LTTE leadership.Why didn't he then pull out of the UPA coalition,bring down the unsympathetic GOI and make an historic stand for the Tamil race? He didn't because he knew as Holmes famously said, that "...the game is afoot" ,and as Lankans say,"machaan-match over! " Prabhakaran was on the verge of being exterminated with the most extreme prejudice and what point was there in supporting a losing cause? In actual fact,his dithering allowed India to tell the GOSL to" get on with the job asap".As his critics have said,it was a great act of sham.
Now that national elections are around the corner and his party has no electoral campaign whatsoever,with madam Jayalalitha ruling the roost in her inimitable style,and his two sons at each other's throats,the great self-styled saviour of the Tamil race weeps copious tears for the son of the man whom he betrayed!
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?N ... SUTH2uvOZU
Some UN facts on LTTE recruiting children.
LTTE recruitmentUNICEF urges Tamil Tigers to stop recruiting child soldiers in Sri Lanka
22 January 2004 – The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) today called on the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka to stop recruiting children as soldiers and to release those it already has back to civilian life.
In a report on children affected in 2003 by Sri Lanka's civil war, UNICEF noted that the LTTE recruited 709 children during the year - nearly half between August and October.
The report stated that over the same period the LTTE released 202 children either directly to their families, or to the transit centre that was opened by UNICEF in Kilinochchi in Sri Lanka's northeast in October.
But UNICEF added it was aware, from reports submitted by families, that the LTTE still had
Before 2007 the LTTE was accused of recruiting thousands of children into their ranks. The LTTE has been accused of knowingly recruiting and using child soldiers as front-line troops. Amid international pressure, LTTE announced in July 2003 that it would stop conscripting child soldiers, but both UNICEF and HRW have accused it of reneging on its promises, and of conscripting Tamil children orphaned by the tsunami.
How the UN failed in Sri Lanka-Amnesty International.
(They were the prime culprits who preached peace but practised war to endure)
" As its forces were depleted, it intensified conscription of child soldiers."
The UN failed to protect civilians during Sri Lanka’s armed conflict, according its own report, prompting Amnesty International to renew calls for an independent investigation into alleged war crimes by the Sri Lankan army and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE).
The Report of the UN Secretary-General’s Internal Review Panel on United Nations Action in Sri Lanka, submitted to Ban Ki-moon, offers a strong indictment of the UN’s response to Sri Lanka’s armed conflict.
It deals with a period of conflict in Sri Lanka when very grave violations of international law are alleged and where effective UN action might have averted some of the worst of the violations.
Instead the text describes a scenario where UN officials repeatedly failed civilians they were entrusted to protect, while ignoring or downplaying mounting evidence of war crimes compiled by their own staff, as they struggled to appease Sri Lankan authorities intent on restricting humanitarian space.
“Unfortunately this report confirms the many troubling allegations of UN failings we have heard since the May 2009 end of the conflict,” said José Luis Díaz, Head of Amnesty International's UN New York office.
“We hope that the report’s strong findings will help improve the way the UN and the international community protect civilians in times of conflict and reform errant relief systems.”
The report should also help to refocus international attention on the very grave problem of impunity in Sri Lanka.
Tens of thousands of Sri Lankan civilians may have been killed through the indiscriminate actions of combatants.
Allegations that war crimes were committed, by both the Sri Lankan armed forces and by the LTTE, were deemed credible in an earlier report produced by Ban Ki-moon's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka. It recommended an independent international investigation.
This recent Internal Review describes vividly the conditions faced by civilians and UN workers.
It details how they were trapped in the conflict region where both sides attacked civilians, but the UN suppressed information about humanitarian law violations, particularly those committed by the Sri Lankan forces.
“This report is also a wake-up call for UN member states that have not pushed hard enough for an independent international investigation into alleged war crimes committed by both Sri Lankan forces and the LTTE in the last phase of the war. The report clearly illustrates the Sri Lankan government’s lack of will to protect civilians or account for very serious violations. There is no evidence that has changed,” said Jose Luis Díaz.
Testimony of survivors collected by Amnesty International alleges that both sides knowingly killed and endangered civilians, and contains details about enforced disappearances of surrendered combatants by the Sri Lankan army.
Eyewitnesses say the LTTE used civilians as human shields against the approaching army, and shot civilians who tried to escape. As its forces were depleted, it intensified conscription of child soldiers.
The Sri Lankan government declared a “No Fire Zone” and directed civilians caught in the conflict to relocate there.
Witnesses say the army shelled the “No Fire Zone”, which both the Sri Lankan army and political leadership knew was densely populated by civilians.
They hit hospitals, killing and injuring patients and staff.
More than three years later, there has been no impartial investigation into these alleged crimes under international law and no one has been brought to justice.
This failure sets a dangerous precedent sending the message that states which, like Sri Lanka have not ratified the Rome Statute, are beyond the reach of international justice and that crimes committed in the name of “combating terrorism” can simply be ignored.