The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & co

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
anmol
BRFite
Posts: 1922
Joined: 05 May 2009 17:39

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by anmol »

Pakistani-Canadian convicted of terrorism, but cleared in Mumbai attacks
COLIN FREEZE

Globe and Mail Update
Published Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 6:04PM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 6:42PM EDT

A Chicago jury has found Pakistani-Canadian Tahawwur Rana guilty of aiding a terrorist plot to attack a Danish newspaper, but found he did not have a role in planning the 2008 Mumbai massacre.

The trial has been closely watched because of allegations that agents in Pakistan's spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate, had worked with a terrorist group known as Lashkar-e-Taiba to plot the carnage of more than 160 people in India's largest city.

The targets in India were scouted by David Headley, a Lashkar operative of mixed Pakistani and American heritage. Now a confessed terrorist, Mr. Headley testified in the hopes of minimizing his eventual sentence.

Mr. Headley, a lifelong friend of Mr. Rana, told the jury his friend had a role in helping him scout out sites for attack in India and for a distinct, but never executed, plot in Denmark that targeted the Jyllands Posten, which published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in 2005.

The jury, which delivered a verdict late Thursday, partly agreed with Mr. Headley's testimony.

"A Federal Court jury has convicted defendant Tahawwur Rana on one count of conspiracy to provide material support to the Denmark terrorism plot and one count of providing material support to Lashkar-e-Taiba, " the U.S. Department of Justice said in a statement released shortly after the verdict.

But it added Mr. Rana was "not guilty of conspiracy to provide material support to the Mumbai terrorist attacks in November 2008."

The jurors, who were not identified in court, declined to talk to the media to explain their split verdict. Though the jury found him not guilty of the most serious accusation, Mr. Rana still faces up to 30 years in prison on the other two charges.

“We're extremely disappointed. We think they got it wrong,” defence attorney Patrick Blegen told reporters.

At the centre of the trial was testimony by the government's star witness, Mr. Headley, Mr. Rana's longtime friend who had previously pleaded guilty to laying the groundwork for the Mumbai attacks and helping plot the attack against the Danish paper. That attack was never carried out.

Mr. Rana, who did not testify, was on trial for allegedly allowing Mr. Headley to open a branch of his Chicago-based immigration law services business in Mumbai as a cover story while Mr. Headley conducted surveillance ahead of the November, 2008, attacks. He was also accused of letting Mr. Headley travel as a representative of the company in Copenhagen.

The trial was highly anticipated because of Mr. Headley's testimony. His five days on the stand provided a rare glimpse into the inner workings of Lashkar-e-Taiba, which took credit for the Mumbai attacks, and the alleged co-operation with Pakistan's ISI. The trial started just weeks after Navy SEALs found Osama bin Laden hiding outside Islamabad, raising concerns that Pakistan may have been protecting the world's most wanted terrorist.

Pakistani officials have denied the allegations and maintained that they did not know about Mr. bin Laden or help plan the Mumbai attacks.

During his testimony, Mr. Headley described how he said he took orders both from an ISI member known only as “Major Iqbal” and his Lashkar handler Sajid Mir. Through emails, recorded phone conversations and his testimony, he detailed how he met with both men — sometimes together — and then communicated all developments to Mr. Rana.

Mr. Rana's defence attorneys spent much of the time trying to discredit Headley who they say duped his longtime friend. They attacked Headley's character saying how he initially lied to the FBI as he cooperated, lied to a judge and even lied to his own family. They claim he implicated Rana in the plot because he wanted to make a deal with prosecutors, something he'd learned after he became an informant for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration after two heroin convictions.

Mr. Headley's co-operation means he avoids the death penalty and extradition.

After the verdict was read, one of Mr. Rana's attorneys approached his wife and said, “I'm sorry,” then huddled with her in conversation. A day earlier, Mr. Rana's wife, Samraz Rana, told The Associated Press that Mr. Headley and her husband were not as close as prosecutors had portrayed during the trial.

While much of Mr. Headley's testimony had been heard before — both through the indictment and a report released by the Indian government last year — he did reveal a few new details. Among them was that another militant leader Ilyas Kashmiri, who U.S. officials believed to be al-Qaeda's military operations chief in Pakistan, had plotted to attack U.S. defence contractor Lockheed Martin. Mr. Kashmiri was reported killed on June 3 by U.S. drone attacks inside Pakistan. While U.S. officials haven't confirmed the death, Pakistani officials say they're certain Mr. Kashmiri is dead.


Tahawwur Rana held not guilty by US for 26/11 Mumbai attacks
Agencies | Jun 10, 2011, 03.45am IST

CHICAGO: A US jury on Thursday cleared a Pakistan-born businessman of involvement in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, but found him guilty of supporting a banned Pakistani militant group and helping an aborted attack on a Danish newspaper.

Tahawwur Hussain Rana, 50, was found not guilty of conspiracy to provide material support to the 2008 attacks in Mumbai in which 166 people were killed, and which carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

But after two days of deliberations, the jury found the Chicago businessman guilty of providing material support to the banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).

He was also found guilty of providing material support to a plot to bomb a Danish newspaper which had published cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed deemed to be offensive by Muslims.

Both counts on which he was found guilty carry substantial jail terms of 15 years to life imprisonment.
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9414
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Amber G. »

^^^ Thanks.. Just to answer the question someone raised and to state the obvious:
Charges on 3 counts:
Not guilty - 26/11 plot - 2008 Mumbai, India attacks that killed at least 164 people.
Guilty - providing material support to terrorist organizations.
Guilty - plotting an attack on Danish newspaper
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by CRamS »

On must appreciate GP's insticnts on this one. On one Arnab show he was cautioning that Chicago trial was more about Denmark than Mumbai and we shouldn't expect too much. He was more interested in the NY trial directly implicating ISI and Paasha.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

You should run a poll on that one too and see the consensus.

Is all drama bazi to make India think they will do something about terror from TSP.

That plea bargain they gave Headley was to ensure the guy is not handed over to India lest more is revealed about their own connivance/act of omission in 26/11.

The evidence bought at so high a price wasn't credible enough to convict Rana.

Lets see what PC wakes up and says?
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by CRamS »

ramana:

I am still puzzled but what kind of pressure would US govt have brought to bear? On the prosecutors? Can't be the jurors. On the judge? I also recall that one of the chief prosecutors on Arnab show said that his job is to prove ISI involvement, but utimately, given the delicate US TSP relations, there will be some diplomacy involved.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

CRS, How did the GOI ensure Quattrochi goes free? By messing up the case.

The US did the same by not providing convincing evidence to the jury beyond reasonable doubt.

Yet they got all that half baked by giving plea bargain to Headley.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by abhishek_sharma »

^ +1. They will also pulverize anyone (even Americans) who dares to challenge the position of US govt. Richard Barlow paid the price.
AkshayM
BRFite
Posts: 146
Joined: 31 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by AkshayM »

US threw a bone to Pakis with this verdict. Indirectly all terror attacks on India is fine. India will just benefit from collateral downing of terror masterminds. The good terrorism (on India) and bad terrorism (US+West) game will go on.

It is clear US went out of its way to exclude Mumbai terror attacks but got denmark conviction which was conspiracy and not an actual attack like Mumbai. This was direct thappad to India and Mumbai terror victims.

On a side note, NPR did not mention "terror attacks" but just "Mumbai attacks" carefully excluding terror/terrorist.

I will go out of my way to not send a penny to NPR/public radio until they mend their ways.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32665
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by chetak »

CRamS wrote:ramana:

I am still puzzled but what kind of pressure would US govt have brought to bear? On the prosecutors? Can't be the jurors. On the judge? I also recall that one of the chief prosecutors on Arnab show said that his job is to prove ISI involvement, but utimately, given the delicate US TSP relations, there will be some diplomacy involved.
A quiet word to some of the more influential jurors perhaps?

There are bound to be some alphas in the pack.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by CRamS »

It would be very interesting to see what spin Sebastian Rotella of pro-publica puts on this verdict. He seemd to have detailed info and was confident that ISI role will come out. He for sure will know of any US hanky panky, and reading between the lines of his views will tell us more.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Lalmohan »

the headlines are misleading. rana appears to have been a facilitator, in that respect he is unlikely to have plotted the 26/11 attack directly, unlike say the two isi psychopaths. headley was probably closer to the actual events. rana was likely just making things happen in the background without direct knowledge but glad that the kaffir were being dealt a serious blow

as outcomes go, it will do. i will wager though that the publicity generated by the trial will have largely shaped US public opinion decidedly against pakistan, and will likely be a factor in the next US elections
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Sushupti »

Modi speaks on the court ruling.

http://narendramodi.in/news/news_detail/1466
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by CRamS »

Sushupti wrote:Modi speaks on the court ruling.

http://narendramodi.in/news/news_detail/1466
I have great respect for Modi despite his colossal f$%k up leading to the Gujarat riots. His points are well taken, but coming now, it will sound more like sour grapes. I mean the fact is that had Rana been convicted, I am sure Modi and the rest of India would have celebrated at the nailing of TSP. But when the verdict turned the other way, its just hot air to claim Chicago court has no jurisdiction over what happened in Mumbai. I mean I agree with Modi, but India's appears so pathetically weak in taking on TSP, that the Chicago trial was a dog bone of sorts. Now even that is taken away from India. Sad, very sad.

Looking forward to R-man's take on the verdict.

Ramana,

PC won't say anything. He is busy taking on the "might" of Ramdev as a grave threat to India's national security. His boss, MMS is going to meet more than halfway with Rana's handlers in TSPA/ISI because you see, theirs' and India's destinies are linked together. US of course says both India and TSP need to be good boys and move on. The fight against so called Al Queda is God ordained "good Vs evil", that India should endure TSP's terrorism because TSP has joined the side of "good" in the battle against "evil".
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

Rana's wife and family sure of his innocence

His travel to India is not proof of his innocence. He might not have known exact date but he was a willing accomplice in Deadly's activities and provided cover for that terrorist.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

Maybe jury lost the moral compass by convicting Rana of planning an attack but not guilty of facilitating an actual attack?

Anyway bad day for the message it sends India.

---------

Pioneer editorial

Mockery of Justice
EDITS | Saturday, June 11, 2011 | Email | Print | | Back


Mockery of justice

June 11, 2011 12:46:52 AM

US court clears Rana of 26/11 charges

The verdict by the jury of the Chicago court which has cleared Pakistani Canadian Tahawwur Hussain Rana of any involvement in the 26/11 terrorist attack on multiple targets in Mumbai that left at least 166 people dead has no doubt come as a dampener. It is amazing that despite the overwhelming evidence by way of extensive depositions by Pakistani American Daood Sayed Gilani, who later changed his name to David Coleman Headley, and what seemed to be a robust case presented by the prosecution, the jury thought it fit to absolve the man who played a key role in plotting the massacre. It is equally intriguing that Rana should have been found guilty on two other charges — providing material support to the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba and participating in the aborted plot to attack the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten for publishing cartoons allegedly caricaturing Prophet Mohammed — on the basis of the same evidence, namely Headley’s disclosures. If we are to believe that the jury went along with Rana’s lawyers who dismissed Headley’s testimony as “unreliable” and termed him “a life-long manipulator, liar and con man” while striking down the prosecution’s charge that he was involved in plotting the Mumbai attack, then it would be in order to raise the question as to why the star witness’s deposition was found to be ‘reliable’ while upholding the two other charges against the accused. Headley’s testimony was in continuum; it cannot be seen in separate compartments with facts being fitted in to suit the jury’s verdict. There is obviously a missing link somewhere and the prosecution must address this issue. The ghastly bloodletting in Mumbai was not about either America (though American citizens were among the victims) or Pakistan (whose establishment was involved in planning and executing the attack); it’s also about India and the US cannot be allowed to ignore this significant fact.

It is absurd to suggest, as has been done by Rana’s lawyers — and accepted by the jury — that Headley had all along “duped” his associate. The two had discussed the Mumbai carnage both before and after it was committed; Rana was fully aware of Headley’s association with the ISI and its pet terrorist organisation, the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba; he knew all along what the America spy-turned-Pakistani agent was up to; he was deeply involved with the LeT (a fact that the jury has upheld); and, he entirely endorsed the butchery. To allow such a man to go unscathed — it’s really not material whether he will serve 30 years in prison for plotting the aborted attack on Jyllands-Posten and his association with a banned terrorist organisation, the LeT — is both a travesty of justice and a repudiation of America’s claim to be leading the war on global jihad. The US Administration will no doubt claim that the verdict is that of an ‘independent’ jury and the unexpected finding is one of the hazards of that country’s justice system with which we must learn to live. But that’s balderdash. The crime was committed in India and both Headley and Rana should have stood trial in this country. That never happened because the US did not want the world to learn more about the deadly duo than was told by American officials. The reason is obvious: The US has a lot to hide, both about itself and its frontline ally, Pakistan.
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7128
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by JE Menon »

>>The US has a lot to hide, both about itself and its frontline ally, Pakistan.

Absolutely right. Their pre-occupation in this issue seems to be to hide their own foreknowledge (or better knowledge) of certain things and the implications that would have on the image of America in general, as well as, secondarily, in India. As such, the current state of play appears to be aimed at bringing out the data that reveals the culpability of Pakisatan while adroitly shuffling the deck, where their own duplicity is concerned. The Rana verdict, despite the pious protestations by the prosecuting agency, is the ideal one from the American perspective. They are aware that we know the underlying mechanics, and to minimise adverse fall-out, the idea has been floated (tangentially) that we might be permitted to interrogate both Headley and Rana. They know that through this approach, GoI will be obliged to keep what it learns to itself; and it will do so - and it will, willy-nilly so to speak, reassure us of their bona fides (which they have been at pains to do since 26/11) going forward. Any way you look at it though, the Pakisatan is facing interesting times ahead - it is only a question of the degree and speed of GUBO, which is clearly no longer a lubricated affair.

None of this would have been considered necessary had there been no full-court press by GoI as far as engagement with the US was concerned, over the past decade. Nor would there have been much traction among US lawmakers on the question of paying attention to Indian sensitivities, had they not become increasingly aware of the growing importance of multiple-interconnected lobbies as well as benefits to their constituencies from a positive engagement with India. All this, no doubt, buttressed by the substantial positive output in the global media about India, and by the substantial and significant economic facts on the ground in India itself.

In short, the fragility of the tightrope on which the US is walking in terms of its bilateral relationships with Pakistan and India is directly related to the growing power of India on all fronts, especially the economic one. We all need to keep this possible big picture in mind, going forward. I suppose there are other possible big pictures as well, but I can't see a clearer one. Maybe someone else can.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

Pioneer reports form PTI:
Govt may charge sheet Headley for German Bakery blast
June 14, 2011 3:11:24 AM

New Delhi | PTI

The government is mulling filing a charge sheet against Lashkar-e-Taiba operative David Headley in connection with Pune's German Bakery blast in 2010 and press for his extradition for it.

Headley, during his testimony before a Chicago court in the trial of his accomplice Tahawwur Rana, had admitted that he did the recce and took photographs of the popular hang-out in Pune, official sources said.

"It is a vital admission and we are considering to make him a co-accused in the charge sheet. We will also press for his extradition in this case," an official, privy to the development, said.

Officials said Headley's extradition should not be an issue in German Bakery case as the Pakistani-American had entered into the plea bargain with the US authorities in connection with the Mumbai attack case.

The government is expecting all relevant documents related to Rana's trial to be received from the United States within the next 15 days.

"After studying the documents, we will take a decision on seeking access to Headley. If necessary, we will send a team to the US," the official said.

At least seven persons were killed and 60 others were injured when a powerful blast rocked Pune's German Bakery on February 13, 2010.

India hopes that the testimony of 26/11 accused Headley that ISI and its operatives were involved in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks will put pressure on Pakistan on its links with the terrorists.

Headley's statement that the Pakistani spy agency and its operatives like Major Iqbal and LeT founder Hafiz Saeed had helped him in laying the groundwork for the Mumbai attacks has exposed Islamabad's role in 26/11, officials said.

The issue was also discussed during the meeting between Home Minister P Chidambaram and his American counterpart Janet Napolitano here last month.
They should just file the charges and no think or mull about it!

Wanna bet that US will say DCH plea bargain applied to all his actions in India whether discovered or not?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

in retrospect the US looks foolish giving plea bargain to Daoud Gilani and not being able to convince a jury of evidence obtained from him to convict an accessory to the Mumbai terrorist attack. Speaks volumes of their competence.
ranjbe
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 21:25

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ranjbe »

An Indian-American author blames MPD (Multiple Personality Disorder) for Headley's sins.
The many faces of a homegrown terrorist
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/MF16Df06.html
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7841
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Anujan »

FYI and for some comic relief: Dawood Gilani's half brother Danyal Gilani (who used to work for Groper -- himself a Gilani and alleged to have attended Dawood Gilani's father's funeral) was hastily shifted to Pak embassy in China where he is a spokesman. He is behind this gem of a press release/news article

As an aside: Groper seems to be some close relative of Headley. Why else would he employ his half brother, share the same last name and attend the Paki's father's funeral?
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7128
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by JE Menon »

I wonder, did the bride convert, or did he? Was the wedding conducted as per Islamic rites? Will they have a wedding in Pakisatan? So many questions...
pgbhat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4163
Joined: 16 Dec 2008 21:47
Location: Hayden's Ferry

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by pgbhat »

JE Menon wrote:I wonder, did the bride convert, or did he? Was the wedding conducted as per Islamic rites? Will they have a wedding in Pakisatan? So many questions...
More importantly did they serve pork at the wedding?
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7128
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by JE Menon »

Indeed. How could I have overlooked :D?
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Prem »

Mooshy Pork?
AdityaM
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2025
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 11:31
Location: New Delhi

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by AdityaM »

Headley wants his son to be a top Pakistani commando
he had been grooming his son keeping this in mind.
So much so that when his son's football coach asked him to kick the ball one day by saying shoot, he instead of kicking the ball, laid down on the ground and posed like he was shooting a gun indicating the level of his indoctrination.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by abhishek_sharma »

'India was never serious about Headley extradition'
In December 2009, national security adviser M K Narayanan had told then US ambassador to India Timothy Roemer that New Delhi's demand for extraditing Pakistani-American terrorist David Coleman Headley was mere posturing to mislead the Indian public, and the government was not seeking his extradition "at this time".

A secret cable - which is part of the latest tranche of diplomatic correspondence released by the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks - sent a day after Narayanan's telephonic conversation with Roemer on December 16, 2009 said the Indian government would be "in the hot seat if it were seen as relinquishing extradition" of the Lashkar-e-Taiba operative.

Narayanan said that it was "difficult not to be seen making the effort". He was responding to a demand by Roemer that India should refrain from requesting Headley's extradition.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by abhishek_sharma »

PC wanted access to Headley, even if he didn’t speak
Home Minister P Chidambaram had asked FBI Director Robert Mueller that New Delhi must be able to say it has had access to David Coleman Headley, even if the Le-T operative did not speak, according to WikiLeaks.

“Chidambaram insisted that the GoI has access to Headley: ‘We must be able to say we had access, even if Headley did not speak’,” the then US ambassador Timothy Roemer said in a secret diplomatic cable released by the website.
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10196
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by sum »

‘We must be able to say we had access, even if Headley did not speak’
:rotfl:
Everything finally boils down to public image management and nothing more...

give a damn if anything useful comes out for Desh or not but GoI( UPA) must be SEEN as doing something ( just like they must always be seen as helping the "minorities" even if in reality, they give a damn about the progress of the "minorities").

Atleast, the UPA seems to be following the same funda in foreign affairs as in domestic politics.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

Rahul Bhatt wants to make movie on Daoud Gilani

http://www.santabanta.com/cinema.asp?pid=49429
Altair
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2620
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 12:51
Location: Hovering over Pak Airspace in AWACS

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Altair »

Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14380
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Aditya_V »

CRamS wrote:
Sushupti wrote:Modi speaks on the court ruling.

http://narendramodi.in/news/news_detail/1466
I have great respect for Modi despite his colossal f$%k up leading to the Gujarat riots. His points are well taken, but coming now, it will sound more like sour grapes. .
Saar doesn't the blame lie on those who burnt the Godhra train. which administration could have prepared for Godhra training burning and the virtually simultaneous riots in Narodia patia.

This was at the time when operation Parakram was on and state was on alert to help the defense forces in case of a war with pakistan. It is a Border state after all.

Who knew of many manifestations and skulldrudery the sikular Brigade (who never fail to praise Pakistan) will come up with. He was also new to the job.

Godhra train burning Gujarat riots achieved the following

1) Made sure heat on Pakistan was taken off

2) Channelised Minorities all over the country into a fear of the BJP.

Go figure who has benefited most from these.
Hiten
BRFite
Posts: 1130
Joined: 21 Sep 2008 07:57
Location: Baudland
Contact:

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by Hiten »

uploaded Tahawwur Hussain Rana's interrogation tapes to YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac4gdhB16Kg
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by ramana »

Pravin Swamy writes in Hindu

Key tape still missing
No media access to FBI questioning him on mystery over his career as U.S. anti-drugs spy

Though a Chicago court has granted media access to a part of 26/11 conspirator David Coleman Headley's interrogation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the videotape that could offer a dramatic insight into the build-up to the carnage will remain out of sight.

FBI agents, sources in the Indian investigation of 26/11 say, had questioned the Lashkar-e-Taiba intelligence operative about his parallel career as a spy for the United States' Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) — a bizarre relationship that may have helped to protect the Pakistani-American jihadist as he prepared the ground for the attacks.

The full interrogation tapes were not, however, presented before jurors in Headley's trial — which means all material, bar two brief clips played in open court at the insistence of defence lawyers, could remain classified for decades.

ProPublica, a leading investigative journalism website and the renowned public broadcaster Frontline, had moved court seeking access to the clips for a documentary scheduled to be broadcast on November 22. The FBI resisted even this limited disclosure, but the judge accepted the argument that the contents of the clips had already been reported.

Sebastian Rotella, of ProPublica, told that “the brief conversations recorded in the videos do not reveal new or spectacular information, but they give an up-close glimpse into a secret world.”

The glimpse is tantalizing — almost infuriatingly so.

Headley's complex relationship with the DEA dates back to at least 1984, when he began smuggling heroin from Pakistan to the U.S. His life as a drug-runner and terrorist played out against the backdrop of his troubled personal life.

His parents, Philadelphia socialite Serill Headley and Pakistani diplomat Syed Salim Gilani divorced soon after they moved to Islamabad in 1960, and Mrs. Headley returned to Philadelphia; her son followed her in 1977. He rebelled against his mother's heavy drinking and multiple sexual relationships by expressing a commitment to neo-conservative Islam — and trafficking narcotics.

In 1984, he travelled to Pakistan's north-west with his childhood friend and co-accused, Tahawwur Rana, to pick up a heroin consignment. Rana's Pakistani military identification, Headley said at the trial in Chicago, made it less likely that their car would be searched.

The DEA, though, caught up with Headley twice — in 1988 and 1997. The second time, he agreed to work as a DEA informant in return for a reduced sentence. Following the events of 9/11, he was also asked to infiltrate terror groups. Headley was thus a U.S. agent when he joined the Lashkar-e-Taiba in 2001. By the United States' account to the Indian authorities, he was deactivated as an agent the following year. :?:

Multiple warnings

There are several good reasons, though, to wonder whether this claim is true.

In 2005, Portia Gilani, the first of Headley's wives, called the FBI in the wake of an assault by her husband. She told the FBI that Headley had made 21 trips to Pakistan and bragged about the several combat and intelligence courses he underwent with the Lashkar-e-Taiba. In the fraught post-9/11 climate in the U.S., authorities have often detained individuals on far less suspicion — but there is nothing to show that Headley was even seriously investigated.

Portia Gilani, a Canadian who worked as a make-up artist, eventually won an immigrant visa to the U.S. under a law, protecting abused spouses of the country's citizens. The New York police, though, did not prosecute — which suggests that some pressure from the DEA might have weighed in on Headley's side. :?:

Later, in 2006, the U.S. obtained fresh evidence of Headley's terror links. Lahore-based Moroccan medicine student Faiza Outhalla knocked on the U.S. Embassy's doors with a detailed account of her then-boyfriend's activities with the Lashkar, after he reneged on a commitment to marry her.

“Indirectly,” she told last year, “they told me to get lost.”

Ironically, the Lahore police demonstrated more interest — incarcerating Mr. Headley for eight days on a complaint from Ms. Outhalla. He was bailed out by the father of his second wife, Chicago-based Shazia Gilani. Early the next year, Ms. Outhalla became his third wife — and accompanied Headley on at least one reconnaissance mission to Mumbai.

India's intelligence services suspect these multiple warnings were ignored because the Special Operations Division of the DEA, a super-secret covert operations organisation responsible for the arrests of international arms dealers Viktor Bout and Monzer al-Kassar, continued its relationship with Headley after his official termination as an agent.

As the DEA's counter-terrorism mandate is restricted to matters linked to drugs, officials could have failed to understand the evidence in their possession. :?:

In 2006, India's National Investigation Agency found, Headley made contact with Peshawar-based narcotics baron Niyamat Shah. Shah was the son of a contact he made during his heroin-trafficking days. The deal led to an arrangement between Shah and the Lashkar to smuggle weapons into India — exactly the kinds of terrorism-narcotics connections the DEA has a special interest in.

The second possibility is that Headley's activities were being monitored, but tolerated in the interests of generating further intelligence.

U.S. intelligence services passed on at least two precise warnings of an impending attack on Mumbai to India; some investigators believe they were based on a covert surveillance of Headley's communication.

The true scope of his role in the attack, this hypothesis holds, was only discovered after his eventual arrest.

Either way, the truth is on videotape — though it could be years before it is seen.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14223
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: The Curious Case of Daood Gilani alias David Headley & c

Post by svinayak »

ramana wrote:
India's intelligence services suspect these multiple warnings were ignored because the Special Operations Division of the DEA, a super-secret covert operations organisation responsible for the arrests of international arms dealers Viktor Bout and Monzer al-Kassar, continued its relationship with Headley after his official termination as an agent.
In US once you are in the military you never leave it even after official discharge. You are assigned to some work which has some govt use.
Post Reply