Stan_Savljevic wrote:RamaY wrote:
That is truly a chanikyan move by BJP.
yes, truly chankiyan indeed, esp when quite a few brf-ites will find any and every logic to explain their pet munna's bullshit maneuvres, just like quite a few will try to explain the congress' bullshit. we have quite a few political extremists on both sides -- but only very few who have the enthusiasm to remain non-partisan.
Stan garu,
Let me explain! Hopefully this calms your heartburn
A sitting UPA cabinet minister called a terrorist (Maoists are terrorists) encounter by Indian police force a "murder". The same government (UPA) called Maoists as the worst threat India faces and it is more dangerous than Islamic terrorism (Read how Tenalai ramakrishna made a line smaller without touching it). Secondly Maoists are a banned militant outfit. Thirdly various state governments announced a reward on all the senior party leaders' heads (Azad guy is a central committee member).
We all know about the two groups (as far as Maoist threat is concerned) in UPA one supporting Maoist propaganda and the other asking for Army. We do not know which group our didi belongs to in this week.
There is a similar situation happened in Gujarat and we all know how well the religion/politics/justice/law-order got mixed there. I am sure you are well-versed with that issue and how BJP got cornered in that state with active involvement of NGOs, GOI, CBI and HC/SC.
Coming to this situation *
1. Didi's statement that Azad's encounter is a "murder". That means the Law/Justice system has to find the person who did the murder. You can point your finger to the direction of your choice.
2. DDM's penchant for anything Maoism. You can get additional insight by reading various news papers and their editorials and farticles.
3. Various NGO/EJ outfits who support Maoists as long as it puts the ruling party in trouble (it doesn't matter if it is NDA/UPA)
4. Now BJP also called it a murder, and I called it a chanikyan move. By now everyone knows the definition of "chanikyan" word in BRF (we should add it to BRF lingo if it is not there already). It means justifying one's pu$$yfutting as brilliant, long-term, and highly classified strategy. Take it as just one of the definitions of that word for a moment. As a yindoo pun-da-mentalist I must have meant it differently with hidden motives.
5. By now we all know that even BJP has its own groups and they are becoming a mirror image of Con-gress as far as Indian Interests are concerned. But we will cut them some slack (as they are our pet yindootvavadi party naaa) and assume that they are a united front (not the turd one but the second one) in this statement.
Now let us analyze plausible responses by various players
1. UPA - UPA II administration must answer three questions. (A) how can a cabinet minister share dais with a banned outfit member (if it is banned) and call a police encounter murder. BTW, did she call the recent Maoist attacks on CRPF camps and trains murder? (B) what it plans to do about this scenario - would it kick didi out or take responsibility and kick MMS's musharraf out {He is the one who called Maoists gravest threat to India, you know} or will it kick PC?, and (C) What should be the basis/criteria for police encounters and how it plans to avoid this issue in future
2. DDM - Would it join hands with Left (the Karat types, you know) and Right (the fascist fundamentalists, you know) to pressure UPA II to take action like arresting senior police officers, bureaucrats, and central ministers? Or would they call BJP's bluff and say this is truly an encounter to kill a maoist terrorist? What would Ar-un-dhotti-roy types do? Will they accept UPA IIs Rajneeti and accept that this is unavoidable in given situations and blackout this issue in Media? What would Pranayroy tell his co-brother? How will Ar-un-dhotti-roy convince her uncle that it is in their best interests? How will Seema Chisti tell her husband Yechuri to shutup or threaten to use 498A if he pressures her to write against UPA II? Can the political AICC influence the religious AICC to keep quite in this case but make a mess in Gujarat?
A key assumption here is that no one is interested in truth (Ekam Sat') and everyone is guided by their self-interests as SwamyG garu proclaims w.r.t Geopolitics (our scope here is Nationalpolitics) and they would use all the tools at their disposal to pursue their self-goals err interests.
Game theory says that when the players are rational (yes, Didi included) and are governed by self-interests then they tend to come to a mutually beneficial compromise. And that would bring some riches to BJP; as this game fell in its lap from UPA2's sky!
Exploiting an unexpected game, especially when you are not an inside player, is sir truly chanikyan!
I love the chin dance.
