Re: General Elections 2014- Largest peaceful transition of p
Posted: 12 May 2014 05:53
dhanyavadaha Ramana ji
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
Lallus railway term was actually a fiasco which was lapped up by Harvard intellectuals.It was found later that all those numbers were trumped.Philip wrote:Like Harvard doing research into milkman Lalu's railway innovations,so too will the US be engulfed in "shock and awe" when Mr. M delivers.The western approach to fawn over the man or woman in charge,in an attempt to seduce the leader of the pack,so that its own interests can be served,is played out time and time again ad nauseum,cometh an election' or regime change.There are exceptions of course,especially if it is a Russian leader like Putin!
This effectively rules out the thought that Priyamvada Gopal is the grand daughter of S. Radhakrishnan and the daughter of S. Gopal.A_Gupta wrote:1. You can go to Google Books, and look at the Acknowledgements section of said P. Gopal's book, "Literary Radicalism in India: Gender, Nation and the Transition to Independence". The first names of her mother, father, brother, and names of her aunt and grandmother are there. Since they are not illuminating, I do not mention them here.shiv wrote:BRFite vsunder has come up with an interesting thought. Priyamvada Gopal may be the daughter of vehemently anti-BJP Sarvepalli Gopal, who in turn is the son of President Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. Their images are below in order of age and luminance, etc.
http://books.google.com/books?id=lf8wfOR1058C
P. Gopal is only one of a number of phoren based intellectuals who are "worried" about Modi.A_Gupta wrote: 5. Since being politically opposed to Modi & the BJP does not make one a chamcha of the Angrez - a good number of the Indian electorate are not going to be voting for Modi or the BJP - I take it that P. Gopal's opposition is not the issue, but rather bringing up this opposition not to the Indian electorate that makes the decision, but in some phoren rag. I agree that was stupid. But not all stupidities arise from being overwhelmed by West-philia.
Yes. But.That said - anyone who joins an election issue in India needs to be ready to accept personal slurs and cannot hide behind issues like "I am a woman. I am a patriot" etc.
The 2014 Lok Sabha polls saw 66.38% of the 827-million-strong Indian electorate exercising their franchise, helping the country set an all-time voter turnout record.
The polling percentage in the world's biggest democratic exercise comfortably surpassed the 1984 turnout of 64% when Rajiv Gandhi became the prime minister after the assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP's) prime ministerial nominee Narendra Modi on Monday wrote on micro-blogging site Twitter, "The biggest joy of 2014 Elections has been the increased turnout. Braving the scorching heat & the rain people turned out in large numbers."
The 2014 polls also broke the record in terms of voters' numbers set five years ago when the Congress-led UPA returned to power for a second straight time.
Altogether 551 million voters - more than the combined population of the US, Germany, Canada and the UK - cast their ballots this year.
The figure shattered the previous record of 417 million for any general election set five years ago, election commission director general Akshay Rout told reporters after the nine-phase polling ended.
Long live democracy! Vote early, vote often, may your vote be counted many times, many happy returns!Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 8:02 pm
Subject: Re: Breaking News-why Exit Polls are wrong----Must Communicate To Narendra Bhai Modi
हम मूर्खों के स्वर्ग में जी रहे हैं|
हम एलिजाबेथ के उपनिवेश के दास हैं| हमें स्वतंत्रता कभी नहीं मिली| हमारी स्थिति किसान के बैल से भी गई बीती है| क्यों कि किसान निज हित में बैल की रक्षा करता है| लेकिन एलिजाबेथ ने हमारे सम्पत्ति और जीवन के अधिकार संविधान बनवा कर हमसे छीन लिए हैं| हमारे गुरुकुल नष्ट कर दिए हैं| हमारी हत्या कराएगी| क्यों कि हमने ब्रिटिश शासन का विरोध किया है| चुनाव का कोई लाभ नहीं| चुनाव द्वारा एलिजाबेथ के इंडियन उपनिवेश के दासों से स्वीकृति ली जा रही है कि उन को एलिज़ाबेथ की दासता स्वीकार है| वे उपनिवेश को स्वतंत्रता मानेंगे| उनको जीवन के अधिकार छीने जाने पर आपत्ति नहीं है| [ भारतीय संविधान का अनुच्छेद २९(१)] उन को अपनी सम्पत्ति और उपासना के अधिकार को छीने जाने पर आपत्ति नहीं है| [भारतीय संविधान का अनुच्छेद ३९(ग)] उन लोगों को जिस विधि से भी हो – नपुंसक (बाइबल, उत्पत्ति १७:११) बनाये जाने पर आपत्ति नहीं है| उन को वैदिक सनातन संस्कृति और गुरुकुलों को मिटने से आपत्ति नहीं है| उनको अज़ान, ईशनिंदा, नरसंहार और लव जिहाद से आपत्ति नहीं है| उनको आतताइयों को इंडिया में रखे जाने और विशेष सुविधाएँ दिए जाने पर आपत्ति नहीं है|
हमने १९४७ से ही इस्लाम और ईसाइयत का विरोध नहीं किया| अज़ान और नमाज़ का विरोध नहीं किया| मस्जिद का विरोध नहीं किया| अपने संतानों को गुरुकुल में शिक्षा दिलाने के बारे में सोच भी नहीं सकते| मनुष्य के उर्जाचक्रों में अंकित एक मात्र देवनागरी लिपि और संस्कृत भाषा के उपयोग के बारे में सोच भी नहीं सकते| आज बैल से खेती करने वाला कोई नहीं|
भवदीय:-
अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी (सूचना सचिव)
आर्यावर्त सरकार,
(deleted)
ब्लाग: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
गणक जाल: http://www.aryavrt.com
पढ़ें: http://www.aryavrt.com/
Is she Indian or Britiish?Cosmo_R wrote:@A_Gupta ^^^
Priyamvada Gopal crossed the line when as an Indian citizen she called on UK intervention to redress a "wrong" in her home country.
+1. What is so special about her? She asks for an intervention in our country because its electorate chooses a leader she doesn't like and on top of it, she expects to be treated with some sort of deference. Arrogant & condescending, not to mention illogical. Take a look at her venom laced diatribes at anyone who thinks differently from her.Cosmo_R wrote:@A_Gupta ^^^
Priyamvada Gopal crossed the line when as an Indian citizen she called on UK intervention to redress a "wrong" in her home country.
Think about about it. You think MMS did a no-no by exculpating the Empire at Oxford? PG is calling for a Yugoslavia on India to subvert a democratic result.
Such folks are not entitled in a gender neutral way to any courtesies
And it would have been far more if the EC had not failed miserably in its job. Lakhs of names missing from voter lists in every state.Suraj wrote:Now that the voting is complete, the turnout statistics indicate an all time high turnout record, beating the 1984 figure by about 2%.
2014 Lok Sabha elections see increased voters' participation, breaks turnout recordsThe 2014 Lok Sabha polls saw 66.38% of the 827-million-strong Indian electorate exercising their franchise, helping the country set an all-time voter turnout record.
The polling percentage in the world's biggest democratic exercise comfortably surpassed the 1984 turnout of 64% when Rajiv Gandhi became the prime minister after the assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP's) prime ministerial nominee Narendra Modi on Monday wrote on micro-blogging site Twitter, "The biggest joy of 2014 Elections has been the increased turnout. Braving the scorching heat & the rain people turned out in large numbers."
The 2014 polls also broke the record in terms of voters' numbers set five years ago when the Congress-led UPA returned to power for a second straight time.
Altogether 551 million voters - more than the combined population of the US, Germany, Canada and the UK - cast their ballots this year.
The figure shattered the previous record of 417 million for any general election set five years ago, election commission director general Akshay Rout told reporters after the nine-phase polling ended.
I agree with your entire post except the last sentence (quoted above) which could have been left out without your post losing any value.ChandraV wrote: Coming to your point on stalkers, most of them are harmless fools - "hai wil u make fraandship with me" types.
I think quite accurate assessment. The finer points are this :Bharath.Subramanyam wrote:Wanted to run a theory by the gurus here.
Theory one:
The first time Nehru-Gandhi family's moral authority was exposed was in Emergency. Till that time any corruption in Congress could be explained away by pointing it to a minister in centre or state. Always the family was above moral questions (even after 1962 war people didn't question or defeat Nehru). It seems Nehru Family was like the Emperor of Japan who was considered not just the sovereign in the ruling sense, but also in the moral sense. I have read some reports/books which says how the Japanese media even after WWII never questioned the Emperor. Also there is very amazing document/book which talks about how General MacArthur was advised by sociologists & anthropologists in US were advising him on how to make changes to Japan. One particular item they told him was that don't remove the Monarchy altogether, since it is seen as an embodiment of Japan and moral. They said (if I remember correctly) that if Monarchy is abolished or attacked in open, it would lead to huge resentment against the US army and the army will face daily attacks.
When I talk to elders in my family (Especially 80+ people), they had some romantic notion of Nehru. It seems there was Japanese style idea in India also, that Nehru can do no wrong. It seems it rubbed off in to Indira also initially. It looks like Emergency broke off this sheen in most parts of India. Of course Indira won back in 1980. But the moral hold of dynasty took a beating. From there on, it has been slide downwards. Of course there is always an inertia effect that will run its course. But by 1989 Congress (12 years from the end of Emergency) had come to levels below 272. May be even before 1977, people would have found fault with Congress on various issues, but I don't think the moral authority of dynasty was ever questioned till that time.
I feel it was the beginning of the end.
Do give me your thoughts, critique, suggestions.
This kind of crap has been going on for a long time, with opportunist Indians even giving presentations against India in the UK and US parliament / Congress or even the UN, to make a case for intervention / UN sanctions / invasion -- it is nothing but treason, and these traitors need to be given third degree treatment.Cosmo_R wrote:@A_Gupta ^^^
Priyamvada Gopal crossed the line when as an Indian citizen she called on UK intervention to redress a "wrong" in her home country.
KOHIMA: Repoll at five polling stations under 39-Sanis assembly constituency of Wokha District in Nagaland reported zero turnout on Thursday, a senior Election Commission (EC) official said.
Polling officials waited for voters since morning, but not a single voter turned up, returning officer (RO) for Lok Sabha polls in Nagaland Temjen Toy said.
Though there was no official communication from the voters behind the 'nil' turnout, Toy said that villagers were resenting imposition of the repoll and questioned on what grounds the EC ordered it.
Repoll was ordered at 10-Lakhuti-I, 11-Lakhuti-II, 13-Lakhuti-IV, 36-Lakhuti-VII and 37-Lakhuti-VIII, under sub section (2) of section 58 of the Representation of People Act 1951, stating that the polls on April 9 were void.
The Congress submitted a complaint to the EC on April 25 alleging that the April 9 elections had been marred with massive proxy voting and election malpractice demanding repoll in over 1300 polling stations.
The ruling Naga People's Front (NPF), however, lodged a complaint with the EC against its decision of repolling alleging that the move was ordered on "mere allegations" of the Congress.
chaanakya wrote:Not a single voter turns up for repoll at 5 polling stations in Nagaland
KOHIMA: Repoll at five polling stations under 39-Sanis assembly constituency of Wokha District in Nagaland reported zero turnout on Thursday, a senior Election Commission (EC) official said.
Polling officials waited for voters since morning, but not a single voter turned up, returning officer (RO) for Lok Sabha polls in Nagaland Temjen Toy said.
Though there was no official communication from the voters behind the 'nil' turnout, Toy said that villagers were resenting imposition of the repoll and questioned on what grounds the EC ordered it.
Repoll was ordered at 10-Lakhuti-I, 11-Lakhuti-II, 13-Lakhuti-IV, 36-Lakhuti-VII and 37-Lakhuti-VIII, under sub section (2) of section 58 of the Representation of People Act 1951, stating that the polls on April 9 were void.
The Congress submitted a complaint to the EC on April 25 alleging that the April 9 elections had been marred with massive proxy voting and election malpractice demanding repoll in over 1300 polling stations.
The ruling Naga People's Front (NPF), however, lodged a complaint with the EC against its decision of repolling alleging that the move was ordered on "mere allegations" of the Congress.
Sorry, but that's been tried. PRC does it. So did the Soviet Union. Didn't work so great. US does it differently... see Jane Fonda's experience.SanjayC wrote:This kind of crap has been going on for a long time, with opportunist Indians even giving presentations against India in the UK and US parliament / Congress or even the UN, to make a case for intervention / UN sanctions / invasion -- it is nothing but treason, and these traitors need to be given third degree treatment.Cosmo_R wrote:@A_Gupta ^^^
Priyamvada Gopal crossed the line when as an Indian citizen she called on UK intervention to redress a "wrong" in her home country.
We need a Patriot Act with specific provisions to regulate the conduct and behaviour of Indian citizens abroad. It should have punishments for Indian citizens carrying Indian passport working against India in other nations to defame it through false propaganda or to incite international intervention in its internal affairs. The law needs provision for confiscating the passport of such traitors, jail terms, fines and disallowing them from leaving the country in future through exit control list. Treason should never become fashionable, and should be put down with extreme prejudice.
A three-tier security cover is in place at the 42 counting centres across the State for the Friday’s counting of votes for the 39 Lok Sabha seats. A total of 13,626 police personnel would be deployed for security duties.
Talking to The Hindu, Chief Electoral Officer Praveen Kumar said there would be 15 tables in each of six halls for a constituency. The total manpower is likely to be 13,000-14,000. Counting of votes for the Alandur Assembly constituency would also be taken up on Friday. Trends were expected from 10 a.m., Mr. Kumar said.
After the completion of the counting of postal votes, counting of votes polled in the EVMs would be taken up after 30 minutes.
There would be 62 observers at the rate of one-three observers per Lok Sabha constituency. Additional observers were being deployed if the distance between two halls was huge in any counting centre. Chennai South and North and Thanjavur were provided with additional observers, besides micro-observers for each table.
The websites of the Election Commission and the Chief Electoral Officer’s office would be updated at the end of every round. A copy of the round-wise and table-wise result would be given to the agent.
After every round, results would be announced before the next round started. The Returning Officers would obtain authorisation from the observers before declaring results.
Only a maximum of four persons would be allowed with the candidate to the Returning Officer’s room for receiving the certificate of election. Counting agents would not be allowed to bring in their mobile phones and electronic devices.
The entire process of counting was being videographed, and the CD would be kept in the custody of the District Election Officer. Mobile telephones, i-pad, laptop or any such electronic device with recording facilities would not be allowed inside the counting hall. The observers, the Returning Officers and the Assistant Returning Officers would, however, be exempt from this rule.
Liquor shops and bars would remain closed on Friday.
And, more evidence that western universities, especially the humanities departments, are becoming cesspools of leftwing fascism, which is why so many Indian marxists seem to be infesting them these days:Take Gaurav, the auto-rickshaw driver, who had come to New Delhi from a farming village in Uttarakhand. He acknowledged that he was better off than his father, having acquired a cellphone, a television, and access to good hospitals.
But he was not happy; on the contrary, he was madder and madder. The city’s clogged roads had become such a frustration, Gaurav said, that when he stops in traffic his knuckles go white clenching the handlebar. When he overheard passengers speaking positively about Congress, he would stop his auto-rickshaw, claiming it was broken, and ask them to get out and walk.He was eager, even desperate, for some change that he could not quite explain.
Last month, Brandeis University banned Somali-born feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali as its commencement speaker, purporting that "Ms. Hirsi Ali's record of anti-Islam statements" violates Brandeis's "core values."
This week higher education's ritualistic burning of college-commencement heretics spread to Smith College and Haverford College.
On Monday, Smith announced the withdrawal of Christine Lagarde, the French head of the International Monetary Fund. And what might the problem be with Madame Lagarde, considered one of the world's most accomplished women? An online petition signed by some 480 offended Smithies said the IMF is associated with "imperialistic and patriarchal systems that oppress and abuse women worldwide." With unmistakable French irony, Ms. Lagarde withdrew "to preserve the celebratory spirit" of Smith's commencement.
On Tuesday, Haverford College's graduating intellectuals forced commencement speaker Robert J. Birgeneau to withdraw. Get this: Mr. Birgeneau is the former chancellor of UC Berkeley, the big bang of political correctness. It gets better.
Berkeley's Mr. Birgeneau is famous as an ardent defender of minority students, the LGBT community and undocumented illegal immigrants. What could possibly be wrong with this guy speaking at Haverford??? Haverfordians were upset that in 2011 the Berkeley police used "force" against Occupy protesters in Sproul Plaza. They said Mr. Birgeneau could speak at Haverford if he agreed to nine conditions, including his support for reparations for the victims of Berkeley's violence.
Mr. Birgeneau, Ms. McCartney, Mr. Weiss and indeed many others in American academe must wonder what is happening to their world this chilled spring.
Here's the short explanation: You're all conservatives now.![]()
No one could possibly count the compromises of intellectual honesty made on American campuses to reach this point. It is fantastic that the liberal former head of Berkeley should have to sign a Maoist self-criticism to be able to speak at Haverford. Meet America's Red Guards.![]()
Injuns are contributing here too.These students at Brandeis, Smith, Haverford and hundreds of other U.S. colleges didn't discover illiberal intolerance on their own. It is fed to them three times a week by professors of mental conformity. After Brandeis banned Ms. Hirsi Ali, the Harvard Crimson's editors wrote a rationalizing editorial, "A Rightful Revocation." The legendary liberal Louis Brandeis (Harvard Law, First Amendment icon) must be spinning in his grave.
Your details are already with them from airline. The luggage's are scanned thru green channelI walked out into the blistering Delhi night, fully aware of two things. First, apart from the stamp in my own passport, the Government of India had no record whatsoever of my arrival in the country, what flight I came in on, what date, where I intended to stay... nothing. Secondly, my carry-ons could have been filled with a million dollars in cash, or however many kilos of RDX, heroin, Bibles, take your pick. And nobody responsible for enforcing the law would have known a thing.
^^ Multiple EVMs from a constituency being counted one by oneUlanBatori wrote:Hey, what is this bijnej of "XYZ LEADS in ABC constituencies"? Don't these electronic machines just give you the numbers in a snap?