Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 2011

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7843
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Anujan »

India plans to train 30,000 Afghan soldiers

http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwid ... n-soldiers
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Satya_anveshi »

Anujan wrote:^^^^^
Popcorn and beer time
and/or as per one puki report:
In the meantime, the country’s eastern front is seeing increased activity, with Indian armed forces getting ready to undertake exercises with 50,000 soldiers, 500 armoured vehicles and jet aircraft and other war paraphernalia in the Rajasthan area adjoining Pakistan. Even then, apologists will continue trying to convince the nation of the good intentions of such war exercises. It is time they and those in the government who hold such views opened their eyes and saw the threat that faces, from the East and now also from the West.
joygoswami
BRFite
Posts: 523
Joined: 11 May 2010 19:08
Location: Destination Moon For 5yrs with Zaid Hamid

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by joygoswami »

Jernail Gullu Ullu, in some rally in 2010.

Image
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Suppiah »

It appears the Paki Supreme Court is the ultimate guarantor and protector to ensure that TSP remains a fanatic barbaric jehadi terrorist animal-land controlled by mullas and military.

Any terrorist gets a warm Digvijay style welcome and Hakkanis are chased around and purged...

With the press playing a similar role other than a few useful idiots like Kamran and I-ass kept alive to ensure taqiya, the future of TSP is very secure...

Article 6 of the Pakbaric 'constitution' which is basically a asswipe toilet paper for its jehadi generals and mullabaric animals, BTW deals with 'High treason'...so the jehadi terrorist judges are pre-judging the affair even before trial is started....

All that remains is for a Qadri to take matter into his own hands to save Paki H&D.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Manish_Sharma »

shiv wrote:
Manish_Sharma wrote:Wow computer literacy is catching fast among the poor of porkistan and the land of pious are really making good use of it:



This is one zaid hamid video no one should miss.
:rotfl:
What channel is this and how wide is its reach? Just curious.
Don't know, just found accidentally on youtube, but it's a huge hit on the fb, with 13 Shares and 40+ comments in just 12 hours!
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by SSridhar »

The Pakistani Supreme Court has zero credibility. This Learned CJ Iftikhar Chaudhry followed the SC's tradition of justifying military coups and even took oath under the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) of Gen. Musharraf. It was during the 'emergency within the emergency' in 2007 that Iftikhar Chaudhry refused to take a fresh oath under the new PCO that resulted in his dismissal. Otherwise, he is as guilty as Justice Munir who termed Ayub Khan's coup as “legalized illegality” and stated, “…victorious revolution or a successful coup d'etat is an internationally recognized legal method of changing a Constitution.”

Anyway, there was significant US intervention in the restoration of dismissed Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, let he forgot that.

There were only two occasions when the judiciary criticized the actions of military dictators. One was the seizure of power in a military coup by Gen. Yahya Khan in c. 1969, which the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Yakub Ali, in a verdict in April 1972 (Vs. Asma Jilani later Ms. Asma Jehangir) described as an usurpation of power. However, Gen. Yahya Khan, had relinquished power by that time in another military coup that installed a civilian President in the form of Z.A.Bhutto but as a Chief Martial Law Administrator (CMLA). The other was in July, 2009 when the Supreme Court termed the imposition of Emergency on November 3, 2007 by Gen. Musharraf as illegal and unconstitutional. Again, Gen. Musharraf had relinquished his Presidency by that time and was living in exile in the UK. On both occasions, the Supreme Court took care to carefully exclude most actions of the military dictator from its purview so as not to cause major problems for the ruling government. In the case of Gen. Musharraf, it was only the appointment of the new Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, the creation of a new High Court for Islamabad, and the appointment by Dogar of 110 PCO judges that were held as ‘null and void’.

According to Pakistani constitution, coup by military is treasonous and punishable by death.

So much for Article 6 against civilians.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by SSridhar »

TSP refuses to co-operate in the investigation of bombing
If we go by the advise of Kamran Shafi, it is only the Deep State that is refusing to collaborate. The Pakistanis are willing.
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Satya_anveshi »

^^ That was a great historical perspective on Puki Superme Court SS garu.
You may have noted from the report that Ms. Asma Jahangir is the lawyer retained by HH. So, she must have quite an experience to navigate thru all this.
SSridhar wrote:According to Pakistani constitution, coup by military is treasonous and punishable by death.
By that count, I hope even *attempted* coup is also treason. If so, does it not mean that as Puki Supreme Court is investigating whether civvies were taking "foreign aid" against a potential coup, it will also investigate whether that claim of millies planning a coup was indeed valid or not? If that claim gains traction, will it turn the tables on millies?
Rahul Shukla
BRFite
Posts: 565
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
Location: On a roller-coaster.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Rahul Shukla »

Virginia Man Pleads Guilty to Providing Material Support to Terrorist Organization (FBI.gov)
ALEXANDRIA, VA—Jubair Ahmad, 24, a native of Pakistan and resident of Woodbridge, Va., pleaded guilty today to providing material support to Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT), a designated foreign terrorist organization.
Ahmad faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison when he is sentenced on April 13, 2012.
“By preparing and posting a graphic video that glorified violent extremism, Mr. Ahmad directly supported the mission of a designated terrorist organization,” said FBI Assistant Director in Charge McJunkin.
Ahmad admitted today that in September 2010, while at his residence in Woodbridge, he engaged in a series of communications with an individual named Talha Saeed, who was in Pakistan. Talha Saeed is the son of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the leader of LeT. Talha Saeed requested Ahmad to prepare a video that would contain a prayer by Hafiz Saeed calling for the support of jihad and the mujahideen. In addition, Talha Saeed instructed Ahmad to present a variety of violent images on the video while Hafiz Saeed’s prayer is heard in the background.

Talha Saeed directed Ahmad to begin the LeT video with a number of pictures of Hafiz Saeed, then show scenes where atrocities have been inflicted on Muslims, followed by the activities of the mujahideen conducting attacks in Kashmir. At one point, Ahmad asked Talha Saeed if he wanted to include an image of the Mumbai attack to show the power of LeT. This is a reference to LeT’s operation against the city of Mumbai, India, on Nov. 26, 2008, which resulted in the death of over 160 people, including six Americans. Talha replied that he should not use anything referring to Mumbai.
Forensic examination by the FBI subsequently confirmed that Ahmad had constructed the LeT video on his computer.
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by arun »

X Posted from the ISI History and Discussions thread.

The Islamic Terrorist supporting ways of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan once again exposed.

NATO document stated evidence from July showed Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence was leading a joint initiative to provide funds and training to Taliban insurgents in northern Afghanistan:

Pakistan, Iran Fund Afghanistan Insurgent Training, Bild Reports
Altair
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2620
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 12:51
Location: Hovering over Pak Airspace in AWACS

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Altair »


Our pilots speak of how we gave F-16's a run for their life during kargil war with Mig-29's and M2000
Must watch video for Jingoes
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by CRamS »

Why is Arnab behaving like a Paki apologist. Trait of an argumentative Indian instead of self interest?

http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Pakistan- ... 390391.cms

http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Pakistan- ... 390392.cms
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Manish_Sharma »

72 Hoors will have 70 dresses when you go to heaven and the dresses will be such that you'll be able to see through the dresses, a great porki maulvi is explaining that don't fall in love with these rotten, dirty, messy whores that all the porki women are:



I beg all the BRFites to see it, you don't know what you're missing :shock:
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by RajeshA »

The above video has already been discussed on BRF.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Manish_Sharma »

^^Oh! When? Must have missed it.
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Satya_anveshi »

saar...after having fun for a few weeks, hakimulla ji even changed his location to "pindliyon ka gooda" :lol:
JwalaMukhi
BRFite
Posts: 1635
Joined: 28 Mar 2007 18:27

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by JwalaMukhi »

SSridhar wrote:TSP refuses to co-operate in the investigation of bombing
If we go by the advise of Kamran Shafi, it is only the Deep State that is refusing to collaborate. The Pakistanis are willing.
Pakis are in a bind. They are in a difficult process of extracting "blood money" for the 24 jihadis killed by NATO. Any help or cooperation could drastically reduce the money that they could extract. Can they extract similar to what other piglets commanded when Ramond Davis put them out of misery? All other drama (threatening to not attend etc.,) is to ultimately up the extraction amount.
Corridors are allowed and as open as they can be. It is classic paki style negotiation tactics.
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Satya_anveshi »

Satya_anveshi wrote:One perspective is that Imran Khan's popularity is like that of Herman Cain's as a republican presidential candidate in US. Both are being pumped up and IMO that much harder are they going to fall as both are punching way beyond their weight although Herman Cain's case is much funnier. Like doc ji sometimes says..I bet my left testimonial if Herman Cain even gets the repub nomination let along winning the race and the right testimonial if Imran wins in a free and fair elections.
OK..Left one is saved. Herman Cain gets out of race in US; there was no way he could have won repub nomination for host of other reasons primary one being the ignominy of having two blacks running for presidentship in US.

Now, Imran seems to be threatening. khuda na khasta, if something really were to happen, I will request mods to change my handle to mohd. ekbal :shock: .
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59878
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by ramana »

How about Imran Iqbal?

8)
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2428
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Brad Goodman »

Dead body of retired PAF high ranking official recovered in Rawalpindi
The police recovered dead body of a retired high ranking officer of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) here in Rawalpindi late Friday night.

According to police dead body of Air Commodore (r) Rahmatullah was found in a car parked in Chaklala Scheme III in the cantonment town of Rawalpindi.

The deceased was shot twice in the head which proved fatal. The police feared that murder could be outcome of personal enmity or family dispute. A case has been registered against unknown murderer and investigations were underway.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59878
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by ramana »

Maybe cleanup of jihadis by rehman dawood types roaming in TSP?
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2428
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Brad Goodman »

Two Natives Of Pakistan Plead Guilty To Fraud
TOPEKA – Two natives of Pakistan have pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud Topeka banks of more than $400,000, Two U.S. Attorney Barry Grissom said today. In their pleas, they have agreed to pay restitution, to give up their American citizenships and to be deported.

Maqsood Baloch, 31, Topeka, and Junaid Iqbal, 30, Topeka, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, wire fraud and Social Security fraud. From 2004 to 2011, they operated a check kiting scheme. Doing business under various names they conspired to defraud multiple banks and businesses by depositing and using insufficient funds checks, and by making electronic payments using false account numbers and accounts with insufficient funds.

Baloch represented himself as director or incorporator of businesses including Gulzar, Alam Traders, American Eagles, KS Express, Ali and Tobacco Town. Iqbal represented himself as director or incorporator of businesses including Jimn, Inc., Rossi, Inc., Topeka Salon and Smokers Paradise Topeka. As part of the fraud scheme they created accounts at banks including Bank of America, U.S. Bank, CNB, Core First and MBNA. Business that were victims of the fraud include Sam’s Club of Topeka, Sam’s Club of Lenexa, and Sam’s Club of Overland Park.

Sentencing is set for February 13th. Baloch has agreed to time served, restitution of $325,556 and deportation. Iqbal has agreed to time served, restitution of $40,090 and deportation.

Grissom commended the Topeka Police Department, the U.S. Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Assistant U.S. Attorney Tanya Treadway for their work on the case.
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Satya_anveshi »

ramana wrote:How about Imran Iqbal?

8)
Yes, chalega. beggers ekbals can't be choosers.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59878
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by ramana »

SSridhar, You are truly a third degree black belt on TSP in all its infamy!
Shaashtanga
BRFite
Posts: 204
Joined: 07 May 2011 06:43
Location: Canuckistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Shaashtanga »

Dear learned maulaners, i have a pooch, kindly humor me by reading the incident and question in full and then respond. This is certainly not OT to the TIRP thread as the question eventually pertains to the relationship between the porkis and tallel then ocean & deepel then mountain fliends. If the moderators think this is OT and not appropriate for this thread, kindly let me know and i shall delete or move.
So here is what happened, today while doing some grocery shopping at our local Walmart super-center, in the meat & poultry aisle, my wife asked, what's the difference between halal & regular meat and why don't the Muslims eat pork. First of all i gave her a dirty look coz that wasn't the time or the place to discuss such matters and moreover our boys were troubling us too much (elder one for toys and the younger was just crying and being fussy for no reason) so i wanted to finish the ordeal and get back home ASAP. In any case i hastily tried to explain to her the basic criteria by which meat is known as halal and the reason behind Muslims not eating pork is because quran says that the pig is filthy animal therefore it shouldn't be consumed. I also told her that when we reach home she can check Wikipedia to get further understanding of this matter if she wants. After that i asked her how come she suddenly wanted to know these details, then she started telling me an interesting incident that she recently found about which caused her to ask those questions, what had happened was my wife's friend (Muslim from Gujarat) told her about another playgroup that she was part of recently had a potluck (each lady in the play group would prepare a dish and they would gather in our building rec room where their kids could play and the ladies would eat the food and chat around) and in that group there mostly Muslim ladies (from India) and Pakistan plus a black christian lady. When they started eating, one of the Pakistani ladies (who recently came to Toronto from LaWhore) asked the black christian lady about the dish she had brought i.e. beef meatballs on spaghetti, the paki lady bluntly asked the black christian lady whether the beef was halal and did she ever cook pork in the same utensil. Black christian lady probably didn't realize that the paki lady was fresh off boat (or she may have experienced similar holier then though attitude incident from a paki) that she snapped back and told her that "this is your first potluck but we have such potlucks every month and the since most other participants are Muslims she gets halal meat from a store where all local Muslims shop for halal meat and only uses the utensil for halal cooking and all her pork cooking utensils were separate". Based on the somewhat angry snapping response from the black christian female, the paki lady took offense and refused to eat what she had cooked, this caused a major outburst and almost a fight like situation in the group, the new paki lady appealed to the other paki (and even Indian Gujarati Muslim ladies) to not eat the black christian lady's spaghetti meatballs. Now my wife's friend tried to calm the situation by telling the paki lady that they have been eating food prepared by black christian lady since long so they trust her but the new paki lady was adamant to not eat it and tried to coax the other paki ladies as well (almost trying to imply to the Indian Muslim women that the paki Muslims were purer etc.) , so now even my wife's friend was infuriated and the situation became very volatile to the extent that they abandoned the potluck and i think the group is now split i.e. the paki ladies will have their potlucks separately and the black christian ladies will have the potluck with the Indian Muslim ladies. Now the other paki ladies (who were part of the group since long didn't want to stop a good social thing that was going but this new jihadi paki lady took all of them down along with her). When my wife's friend was telling the incident to her, she also mentioned that majority of the paki ladies who were from Lawhore tried to show holier then thou attitude in the mosque and other social events i.e. going to parent-teacher meetings with burqa's on , she also mentioned that the shia's from Karachi were more open minded and assimilating into the contemporary culture of participating in Diwali celebrations and even sending their kids for trick or treating during Halloween.

Now, coming to my question, and believe me i tried to search answer on net but couldn't find, when PLA is in Porkistan do they get regular pork shipments from Pandaland or they get local pork (highly unlikely in porkistan) and when Porki sherdils or other TFTA's are in Pandaland do they dare ask PLA cooks whether the food they are eating was cooked in separate utensils (in which pork was never cooked) or do the Porkis also rely on their own imports from porkiland? i have also watched shiv saars video where he tries to open the eyes of porki apduls that China is the biggest pork producer and consumer in the world. Still not sure how the arrangement is between Pandaland PLA & Porkis when it comes to pork. Have the porkis come to a consensus (at-least the RAPE's & defense) that pork will be a non issue between the deepel then ocean , tallel then mountain, sweetel then honey, stlongel then steel, fliendship between PakWhore & Chipanda? Can this become an issue in the future? Can the Porki Apdul eventually Qadrify those who endorse the godless commie chipandas who eat pork?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59878
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by ramana »

Hallal meat is meat from animals (non pig) which are slaughtered after a ritual. The ritual consists of some prayer and cutting the throat to bleed the animal to death. Very anti PETAish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halal


The reason why Muslims and Jews don't eat pigs is the prohibition on eating animals with cloven hoofs ie no split hoof. Pigs have a unitary hoof ie single hoof. A few more are added to this but broken: hare, camel an one other.

Next level is kosher which is only for Jews. Essentially no cooking in milk, wine or spirits.
So korma is ruled out!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosher_foods

About 30 years ago a paperback about which foods are ok for Muslims was quite popular. My Paki colleague would whip it out before the vending machine but had no qualms running after gori women. I told him that was also haram and he should check with his ammijan.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by shiv »

Manish_Sharma wrote:^^Oh! When? Must have missed it.
Yes indeed, my place of residence was changed by this video. However, thanks for posting this one because we had a long discussion about pindliyon ka gooda. This one has subtitles and makes it easy for more people to understand what mullah p0rnuddin is saying
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by shiv »

shaashtanga that is an interesting question and let me post my take on the answer. But first a piskological observation about you. You are asking the question like an honest person and wondering how the problem would be solved by another honest person who is true to his stated principles. Pakis and in fact a whole lot of Muslims bark more about taboos and are less strict about the practice. A lot of it is for show onlee. At the start of gulf war 1 an Iranian had described how an Iraqi at a nightclub with a woman on each arm and a drink in hand threw a fit at a waiter for offering a ham sandwich.

Pakis are like that. Especially the RAPE and army. They were open consumers of liquor and perhaps even pork, but in order to do that they had to have a bevy of loyal servants who would unquestioningly obey his master. This system existed in old India and some of our parents and grandparents may have had such loyal servants. Certainly the armed forces of pre-partition India had loyal men who would unquestioningly obey the afsar's orders and not question his personal habits. For this reason it was quite possible for RAPE to live like they did and entertain goras with what they wanted and allow the Chinese what they wanted.

But in the last 20-30 years Islamization has taken its toll and even soldiers and servants (who are not Christian or Hindu) will resist serving alcohol and certainly pork and increasingly baulk at the thought of a mixed male-female gathering. That it why rotten bustard Pakistanis have found it convenient to maintain a sub-class of Hindus and Christians who serve as servants or people who can get liquor permits. But the army is getting increasingly Islamized and the chances of Qadrification are getting higher.

I believe that it will not be easy for Pakistanis to host and support very large Chinese populations without risking trouble and it is our duty to ensure that there is trouble by taking every opportunity to use the media to let Pakistanis know how much the Chinese love pork. I am certain the Chinese, in order to such Paki dick will have orders to keep off pork for some time. Nevertheless, it will be only a matter of time before something gives. It would be great to see a few Chinese heads being chopped off by the Taliban for pork eating.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12326
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by A_Gupta »

What is "reverse Kargil"?
http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDe ... 685&Cat=13
(last paragraph - if Russia also cuts the supply routes NATO will face reverse Kargil)
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Suppiah »

Hakeemullah, that is an old feature..Ghalib covers it beautifully..

Adha Musalman. Sharab peeta hoon, suar nahin khata
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2270
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by RCase »

I guess the tactically brilliant will think that the NATO/US troops will be sitting ducks in Afghanistan and they can take pot shots at US/NATO aircrafts. They may be in for a rude shock when they find the war just crossed over their borders and have NATO/US troops in Pakiland and a naval blockade of Karachi (which is actually their jugular vein, rather than Kashmir). These bozos will truly start to see the stone age! They will have planes, but no fuel to fly them, communications equipment, but no electricity to turn them on! :mrgreen: I am truly amazed at the bluster of Hamid Gul types.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Suppiah »

Brad Goodman wrote:Dead body of retired PAF high ranking official recovered in Rawalpindi

The deceased was shot twice in the head which proved fatal.
...surprising..a marital race should be able to take such blows and give it back...look like they cannot even fight with 18 yr old repairmen..
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2270
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by RCase »

I would appreciate if someone can explain why is a big deal made out of Pakis not attending Bonn? If they are not present, then the rest of the stakeholders can come up with a plan that does not involve the Pakis and they would be the losers for not having their inputs heard. If history is to be a guide, even if the Pakis did sign on the dotted line to any agreement that may be reached; they are highly unlikely to honor that agreement. Wouldn't it be advantageous to the world if the Pakis were kept out of the meeting as they are the problem?
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by shiv »

Suppiah wrote:Hakeemullah, that is an old feature..Ghalib covers it beautifully..

Adha Musalman. Sharab peeta hoon, suar nahin khata
Suppiah - you are showing exactly what the Pakis love to do in front of goras. They pretend to be the descendants of the culture of Mirza Ghalib when they are actually fakes. Wiki has an interesting sentence about something that Ghalib wrote - I am no Ghalib expert but I have a vague idea - hence Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirza_Ghalib

In another verse directed towards the Muslim maulavis (clerics), he criticized them for their ignorance and arrogant certitude: "Look deeper, it is you alone who cannot hear the music of his secrets". In his letters, Ghalib frequently contrasted the narrow legalism of the Ulema with "it's pre-occupation with teaching the baniyas and the brats, and wallowing in the problems of menstruation and menstrual bleeding" and real spirituality for which you had to "study the works of the mystics and take into one's heart the essential truth of God's reality and his expression in all things".
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Suppiah »

Shaashtanga, such matters can be 'arranged' to mutual satisfaction. I don't think the Chinese will object if instead of pork, they are offered some two legged, live offerings in exchange. They can borrow from Unca Clinton's "dont ask dont tell" policy. Furthermore, nowadays Chinese eat as much beef as pork which is part of the new-found economic success..although it would create some logistical issues..

For an interesting comparison, you can read about how the old GNB managed the situation when Ustaad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan, a guest at his house, demanded meat because he cannot eat vegetables..and sing
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Suppiah »

shiv wrote: Suppiah - you are showing exactly what the Pakis love to do in front of goras. They pretend to be the descendants of the culture of Mirza Ghalib when they are actually fakes.
There is another one, mullahji, which covers this situation too, I have to google to find exact words..not sure if it is Ghalib, it goes 'I saw you going in when I came out of the tavern'

added later..yes it is ghalib, and thanks to google, here it goes..

kahan maikada ka darwaza, Ghalib, aur kahan waiz
par itna jaante hain, kal woh jaata tha ke hum nikle.

Where is the door to the tavern? Where is the preacher? I only know he was leaving the tavern door when I entered..
Last edited by Suppiah on 04 Dec 2011 07:40, edited 1 time in total.
Airavat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2326
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 11:31
Location: dishum-bishum
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Airavat »

Pakistan does have a large population of wild boar, which is related to the domestic pig:
a senior official of the National University of Sciences and Technology (Nust) maintained: “We have several hundred students on the campus, which also has a residential area, and herds of boars cross into the area every night. We do have a barbed wire around the campus but these wild boars damage them and enter the campus, becoming a source of concern for the security of students and families.”

He said a team of dog handlers did visit the campus as their help was sought after seeing a practice of containing the movement of wild boars in DHA Phase-I. “Learning from their experience, we sought help of the same team from Chakwal and they helped us in killing wild boars around the vicinity of the campus,” he added.

A senior official of Pakistan Wildlife Foundation, Mohammad Waseem, said: “It`s inhuman and cruelty to animals and killing of boars in this manner is against animal rights. You can give permits to foreigners since they may enjoy its meat. And the other way is to give them poison if you really want to contain their movement.”
archan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6823
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by archan »

Suppiah wrote:
shiv wrote: Suppiah - you are showing exactly what the Pakis love to do in front of goras. They pretend to be the descendants of the culture of Mirza Ghalib when they are actually fakes.
There is another one, mullahji, which covers this situation too, I have to google to find exact words..not sure if it is Ghalib, it goes 'I saw you going in when I came out of the tavern'
Kahan maikhane ka darwaza Ghalib, aur kahan waaiz
Par itna jante hain kal woh jata tha, ke hum nikle

(waaiz = a person who never consumes alcohol, a puritan)
The sher means, "it is unthinkable that a waaiz would be seen anywhere near the door of a tavern, however, I know this much that yesterday he was entering as I was exiting..."
(if you feel like listening in the evergreen voice of Late Shri Jagjit Singh http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cjx3Hk8qYXY)
Shaashtanga
BRFite
Posts: 204
Joined: 07 May 2011 06:43
Location: Canuckistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201

Post by Shaashtanga »

Shiv saar & Suppaiahji, thanks for responding to my question.

I have decided that in my office Christmas party this year (in which many chinis & porkis will be participating), i shall make my piskological dick move i.e. i will have some pork ribs on my plate and walk over to wherever i see a few chinis and porkis together (along-with some goras) and ask them (2 scenarios) -

Scenario 1 (if few chinis have pork ribs or any other pork items on their plate too) -


I will say to them, Chinese love pork and the chini will snicker and say yeah dude we do, then i will throw my googly that PLA has many troops in porkistan, how are they living without pork (coz pork is banned in porkistan), it will be interesting to see if the chinis get defensive first or porkis or they altogether deny PLA presence in porkland.


Scenario 2 (if no chini has any pork ribs or any other pork items on their plate) -


Then I am gonna say, mann these pork ribs are dope, how come you guys aren't having any.

In either case i plan to get their chaddis in a twist in front of goras, and if the porkis try to throw a reverse pisko at me by saying how come i being a hindu have pork on my plate then i am gonna tell them that although i am a kaafir hindu but i am highly inspired & motivated by the godless commie chinis and i plan to become awesome like the chini therefore i decided to start eating pork. I am quiet sure the chinis will not get my sarcasm and if the porkis say anything after that to counter me the chinis might take offense. Jai ho.

I fully agree with Shiv saars point that this "pork" issue should be highlighted as much as possible in both international and porki media so that some PLA troops or chini engineers are qadrified for being swine eaters. Muslims of Sinkiang province should be instigated by the porki apduls to rise against the swine eating Han.
Post Reply