indranilroy wrote:3. Army further asked them for 90 degree dive mode, which they now can. This automatically means that they have anti aircraft carrier capabilities. They won't sink it, but they will immobilize it.
Impressive. But how much does the range suffer for such a drastic maneuver at supersonic speeds? At what height do they initiate the drop? Surely they aren't expecting the missile to fly at high altitude and still find the ship underneath it without external cueing?
I thought this was more for use against mountain targets rather than aircraft carrier strikes (which need as max a range as possible at low altitudes).
indranilroy wrote:4. 5 Brahmos NGs can be fitted on the Su-30.

How small are these missiles? How much performance has to suffer for FIVE of them to go under an Su-30?
indranilroy wrote:5. They can get to hypersonic (Mach 5) missile by modifying the current engine with different materials/coatings.
6. Going beyond that is the challenge.
This can't be right. Just changing the materials/coatings? They can improve the performance somewhat, but how on earth is that current inlet gonna work at Mach 5??
Actually, I take that back: it "may" work with just different materials, but it will be
far from efficient. They would need to redesign it to be truly a mach five missile. And that's what the HSTDV was for.
And speaking of HSTDV: whatever happened to that? It was such a nice step forward.

Now we have to listen to "Mach five missiles" with changed materials and coatings.
