Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by pankajs »

Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 7m7 minutes ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

BTW the Sudarshan LGB project has been closed by ADE. It is not being pursued anymore.
Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 5m5 minutes ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

Sudarshan LGB accuracy was found to be inaccurate and it was proving expensive as well.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

Option1. Mms scrapped abm projects as cbm to.keep tsp and usa happy.
Option2. Gone undercover once the usa started nosing around offering "help" , pac3 etc
JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3176
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by JTull »

pankajs wrote:
Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 7m7 minutes ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

BTW the Sudarshan LGB project has been closed by ADE. It is not being pursued anymore.
Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 5m5 minutes ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

Sudarshan LGB accuracy was found to be inaccurate and it was proving expensive as well.
Why not keep trying until you get it right? Beg, borrow or steal, when will we learn? Until then we keep buying at godforsaken prices.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by pankajs »

Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 2m2 minutes ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

Nirbhay's low altitude test flight scheduled to happen by April is essentially a test of the naval version.
Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 1m1 minute ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

The Nirbhay project had actually been on the verge of closure a few years ago. It was resurrected almost from the dead.
Saurav Jha ‏@SJha1618 16s16 seconds ago Bengaluru, Karnataka

Today heavier Nirbhay variants are in various of stages of development as are higher thrust expendable turbofan engines to follow the MANIK.
Last edited by pankajs on 19 Feb 2015 21:40, edited 1 time in total.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

JTull wrote:Why not keep trying until you get it right? Beg, borrow or steal, when will we learn? Until then we keep buying at godforsaken prices.
There were two LGB programs. Sudarshan and NG-LGB (Next Gen LGB). In all likelihood, Sudarshan may have been dropped (useful as a test bed) and the NG LGB program will continue. It will be more expensive, but with a MINS-GPS, it will have longer range & be equivalent to our imported Griffins.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

Prasad wrote:We haven't heard much about PAD/AAD in a while now. Anything at AI?
An AAD test is to happen soon per reports, along with a Nirbhay test. PAD is now replaced by the PDV.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

negi wrote:SA 5 news is like the Backfire news , we never had them even otherwise it is very close to being under prohibited items as per MTCR guidelines.
Correct
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by shaun »

Manik turbofan GT engine dev'd by DRDO-GTRE for subsonic cruise missile on display
Image
link : https://twitter.com/dpidrdo/status/5682 ... 12/photo/1
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

looks like the compressor blades are welded to the cone and not individually bolted for replacement given the one time use of the engine. maybe it will be two times, once after manufacture and one in firing.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Indranil »

It is not welded Singha ji. The blades and the disk are a single piece. This is called a BLISK.
member_20067
BRFite
Posts: 626
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by member_20067 »

do we still produce Prithvi ? I thought the lot is reaching shelf expiry date and will be replaced by Prahar...
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25358
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by SSridhar »

Prithwiraj, that was the Prithvi-I (designation P-I), an early Army version with a range of 150 kms that has been replaced with Prahaar.
VinodTK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3252
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by VinodTK »

LIVEFIST: Stalled SR-SAM: Parrikar Briefed Twice In A Month
FIRST OFFICIAL MBDA CONCEPT IMPRESSIONS OF SR-SAM.
European missile house MBDA is making a strong effort at the highest levels to give the comatose long-proposed joint Indo-French SR-SAM development programme new life. Top MBDA executives sought time with Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, meeting him twice in the last one month, to brief him about the SR-SAM (proposed to be called 'Maitri'). Sources say Parrikar heard out the MBDA executives but made no commitment, only saying that the representation would be looked into.

To be sure, it's a tricky situation for MBDA. The SR-SAM programme was all but sunk last year when the Indian Air Force said the Indian Akash SAM it deployed was sufficient for the short range air defence role, and that it didn't feel the need for a separate SR-SAM. The Akash SAM being a DRDO success means the latter is now perceived to have little or no incentive to partner with MBDA on the SR-SAM, but simply to continue working on the Akash and extend its range and capabilities for an anticipated Mk.2 version that the IAF and Indian Army are reportedly keen on.

Anticipating that situation, MBDA opened discussions late last year with DRDO, offering that the proposed SR-SAM, could be, in effect the Akash Mk.2 in terms of capability. The Akash SAM in service sports a range of 25-km, while the proposed SR-SAM is intended to hit targets out to a maximum of 40-km. It isn't clear just yet what the DRDO will choose to do. At any rate, the success of the Akash programme, and a rare public show of satisfaction from the forces gives DRDO more options, though the time factor could be key in a decision going forward.

"The aim of this programme, one of several initiatives within the Indo-French strategic dialogue, was to contribute to the development of the Indian defence industry. This would enable India to set up automated production lines for seeker, sub-assembly and full missile production. Despite SR-SAM ticking all the boxes regarding ToT, timescale, capability and equally economics, a decision is still to be made," MBDA officials told me.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60224
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by ramana »

Sudarshan LGB to me looked like it didn't have enough controllability by looking at the earlier drop videos. Maybe not the right fins. Its strange they can do many things but not this one. If they had user support it could have been overcome. But user wants ready made khan solution. Sudarshan LGB had the potential to convert many of the dumb bombs into effective weapons.

---
Added later.

From Dileep's photobucket album:

Looks like the Alpha Design Systems-Elbit product Lizard-IN does the same job and hence makes Sudarshan LGB redundant and a waste.

Image
So I stand corrected.....
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

The mbda proposal is hilarious.
An srsam with 40km range ie a rebranded aster15 assembled in India.

Le cheval dung.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

Ramana the design was probably dropped for the next program which was a new LGB by itself
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

Singha wrote:The mbda proposal is hilarious.
An srsam with 40km range ie a rebranded aster15 assembled in India.

Le cheval dung.
singha, looks like several JVs were political...
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5619
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by RoyG »

MBDA wants to push through all these BS JV as indian privates and public sector units begin making major advancements in seeker, materials, and propulsion tech.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by shiv »

indranilroy wrote:It is not welded Singha ji. The blades and the disk are a single piece. This is called a BLISK.
I had photographed some desi blisks in 2013 and wondered what they would be used or. Looks like these chotu engines are being developed with Indian materials. Makes sense.
Image

Can someone fill in more details about that 25 KN engine?
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

Singha wrote:The mbda proposal is hilarious.
An srsam with 40km range ie a rebranded aster15 assembled in India.

Le cheval dung.

If only Euros will never give clearance for aster 15 jv it's worse its vl mica with a booster.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

They can park it where the sun never shines or seek a jv with tsp.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Austin »

Interview former DRDO chief, Avinash Chander

‘It (Sacking) Was A Surprise. There Was No Discussion’
member_28932
BRFite
Posts: 107
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by member_28932 »

indranilroy wrote:Brahmos missile talk.

1. A frigate hit by Brahmos, breaks into 2 and sinks in 4 minutes.
2. They can hit a house in an urban situation. Basically the test was a model village build by the Army in the desert. The aim was to take out a house. They did.
3. Army further asked them for 90 degree dive mode, which they now can. This automatically means that they have anti aircraft carrier capabilities. They won't sink it, but they will immobilize it.
4. 5 Brahmos NGs can be fitted on the Su-30.
5. They can get to hypersonic (Mach 5) missile by modifying the current engine with different materials/coatings.
6. Going beyond that is the challenge.
Excellent!!!!!!

At mach 5 and above, it will be very difficult to down a missile like Brahmos even with Laser as said by an American analyst in that famous article "how to defend Brahmos?"
vivek_ahuja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2393
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vivek_ahuja »

indranilroy wrote:3. Army further asked them for 90 degree dive mode, which they now can. This automatically means that they have anti aircraft carrier capabilities. They won't sink it, but they will immobilize it.


Impressive. But how much does the range suffer for such a drastic maneuver at supersonic speeds? At what height do they initiate the drop? Surely they aren't expecting the missile to fly at high altitude and still find the ship underneath it without external cueing?

I thought this was more for use against mountain targets rather than aircraft carrier strikes (which need as max a range as possible at low altitudes).
indranilroy wrote:4. 5 Brahmos NGs can be fitted on the Su-30.


:shock: How small are these missiles? How much performance has to suffer for FIVE of them to go under an Su-30?
indranilroy wrote:5. They can get to hypersonic (Mach 5) missile by modifying the current engine with different materials/coatings.
6. Going beyond that is the challenge.
This can't be right. Just changing the materials/coatings? They can improve the performance somewhat, but how on earth is that current inlet gonna work at Mach 5??

Actually, I take that back: it "may" work with just different materials, but it will be far from efficient. They would need to redesign it to be truly a mach five missile. And that's what the HSTDV was for.

And speaking of HSTDV: whatever happened to that? It was such a nice step forward. :( Now we have to listen to "Mach five missiles" with changed materials and coatings. :roll:
vivek_ahuja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2393
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vivek_ahuja »

Aditya_V wrote:
patrika wrote:Image
India on Thursday successfully test-fired its indigenously developed nuclear capable Prithvi-II surface-to-surface missile with a strike range of 350 km as part of a user trial by the army from a test range at Chandipur in Odisha.

With a strike range of 350 km, Prithvi-II is capable of carrying 500 kg to 1,000 kg of warheads and is thrusted by liquid propulsion twine engines. Read More
This particular Prithvi missile looks unusually fat, is it due to some photography issue.
The photograph has been stretched and that gives it the "fat missile" effect. Check out the actual truck pics elsewhere to see what I mean.

Standard Prithvi missile user test here.
Mukesh.Kumar
BRFite
Posts: 1409
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 14:09

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Mukesh.Kumar »

Noob Question: If the BrahMos is as potent as it is why has the Russian Federation procured it? The Onyx P-800 has both lower range and speeds.
kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6278
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by kit »

mein guess is a salvo of brahmos targeted at radar and defensive systems and runway of an aircraft carrier can severely cripple it ..maybe they could even develop specialized war heads to do the work !
vivek_ahuja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2393
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vivek_ahuja »

kit wrote:mein guess is a salvo of brahmos targeted at radar and defensive systems and runway of an aircraft carrier can severely cripple it ..maybe they could even develop specialized war heads to do the work !
Right. But from what standoff range? Surely the range can't have been preserved for such a massive reduction in mass and size?
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

Mukesh.Kumar wrote:Noob Question: If the BrahMos is as potent as it is why has the Russian Federation procured it? The Onyx P-800 has both lower range and speeds.
Not sure i follow you Onyx/yakhont (which likely was funded with china's help and have shown off their "own" variant) has same speed and range as Brahmos, differences are on the seeker and onboard computer.


For russian navy they only started inducting new FFG that have univ VLS that can fire Brahmos, onyx and klub missiles. They have no plans to update old vessels to carry UVLS which Brahmos corp was hoping for.
abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3090
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by abhik »

Mukesh.Kumar wrote:Noob Question: If the BrahMos is as potent as it is why has the Russian Federation procured it? The Onyx P-800 has both lower range and speeds.
AFAIK the onyx has both greater range and higher payload and speed I believe is also similar. The only thing that the the Brahmos has going for it are the incremental improvements made by us. But one thing we must give to the Brahmos is that in spite of having been acquired on only one country it has been a great marketing success.
jamwal
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5727
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 21:28
Location: Somewhere Else
Contact:

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by jamwal »

Launching from aircraft provides the missile with some initial velocity and prevents it from wasting too much fuel just to leave ground and get in air. There will be some reduction in range, but it should be partially compensated.
OTOH, Su-30 with 5 air-launched Brahmos is hard to believe. Are all hardpoints so strong ?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25358
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by SSridhar »

ICF bags defence order for Rs. 300-cr. S.Vijay Kumar, The Hindu
The Integral Coach Factory here [Chennai] has bagged a Rs. 300-crore order from the Ministry of Defence for manufacturing customised coaches for the Army.

The 72 specially designed coaches, including 40 two-tier AC compartments, are for transportation of defence personnel and equipment.

Parrying questions on the specifications of the order, a railway official said the heavy weight olive green coaches would be designed for movement at low speed. A special team of mechanical engineers was working on the prestigious project, which included some special wagons.


Days after the order was approved, a team from the Defence Research and Development Organisation held discussions with ICF General Manager Ashok Kumar Agarwal, Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer P. Balasundar and others here on Thursday and finalised the design aspects.
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

jamwal wrote: OTOH, Su-30 with 5 air-launched Brahmos is hard to believe. Are all hardpoints so strong ?
Take that with a grain of salt most likely number is 3 Brahmos-M, remember pics last decade which displayed Mki carrying 3 Brahmos-A, Mig-27/29 carrying one. And as we later found out none of the platforms can carry it and even Su-30 can't carry them without structural modifications'.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Indranil »

Actually, that 5 Brahmos-M per airplane is almost certain. I heard it from multiple places, from the Brahmos head and also the HAL head. But, I feel although the capability will exists and photos will be published, at most 3 will be fielded operationally.
dinesha
BRFite
Posts: 1211
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 11:42
Location: Delhi

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by dinesha »

Mysuru firm develops critical technology for missiles
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/busi ... 398591.cms
BENGALURU: On March 13, 2013, India had to destroy its a nuclear-ready cruise missile 'Nirbhay' during its first flight trial after it deviated from its intended course, creating fear. The kind of damage and loss such incidents could cause in the absence of a self-destruct mechanism is grave, but India doesn't completely posses the software and intellectual property for such technology.

As the make-in-India campaign chugs along in the defence sector, the DRDO has found a reliable partner for this technology in a Mysuru firm--Kaynes Technology.

A senior DRDO official told TOI that the company has developed an Electronic Safe Arm Fire Systems (ESAFS) Ballistic Missile Actuator Unit, which is being evaluated by the DRDO's missile teams for integration into various platforms.


"Among the key features of ESAFS is that it provides for a self destruct feature, which is critical not only during the testing phase of missiles, as has been established but also during actual operations," he said.

Kaynes' system consists of two processor cards and one communication/connector card that carries the commands, and facilitate relay control. "Not only can the missile be self-destructed after launch but it also has a feature where it destructs itself upon recognising unauthorised access," the official explained.

He said that given the sensitivity of these assets, it is key that no unauthorised access is allowed. Apart from the self-destruction feature, the system also helps prevent tampering, and is able to function in most conditions. "It is thermal, humidity, vibration and shock compliant," he said.

Upon contacting the firm, its Vice-President (Business Development) Lt Col (retd) Sharath Bhatt said: "I can't comment on the technology as it is sensitive and DRDO is evaluating it. Only DRDO can speak about it."

However, Bhatt, who is an artillery man from the Army, said: "What such technologies means is that India will have its own intellectual property in critical areas and will not have to depend on other countries. Also, in terms of replacement of systems or upgradation for future programmes, the process will simpler and quicker."
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

probably the brahmos-M would be a fairly small missile of Harpoon or KH59 size, so anybody in the IAF would be able to carry 2-3 and the su30 5.
its diameter would also surely be smaller than regular brahmos to preserve the L:D ratio.
http://weaponsystems.net/image/s-varian ... oon_v4.jpg
member_24684
BRFite
Posts: 197
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by member_24684 »

,
^^^

seems yes , If we miniatures the Brahmos M size, then the Su 30 MKI can carry 4 or 5

Image

F 18 with four Harpoon
JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3176
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by JTull »

Singha wrote:probably the brahmos-M would be a fairly small missile of Harpoon or KH59 size, so anybody in the IAF would be able to carry 2-3 and the su30 5.
its diameter would also surely be smaller than regular brahmos to preserve the L:D ratio.
http://weaponsystems.net/image/s-varian ... oon_v4.jpg
From 8.4m length and 60cm dia Brahmos, it's a long way down to 3.8m length and 34cm dia of harpoon. I'll be surprised if they manage that much reduction with Brahmos NG.
abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3090
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by abhik »

The Brahmos-M was reported to be around 6m long with 0.5m diameter and weighing in at 1.5T, son nowhere as light/small as the harpoon. I would guess that the MKI has 5 hardpoints which can carry the missile but realistically I would be surprised if it carried any more than 2.
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

indranilroy wrote:Actually, that 5 Brahmos-M per airplane is almost certain. I heard it from multiple places, from the Brahmos head and also the HAL head. But, I feel although the capability will exists and photos will be published, at most 3 will be fielded operationally.
I suppose it can carry that load if weight is 1.5 tons. But the biggest advantage of Brahmos M IMO is that it can fit in 21 inch torpedo tubes.
Post Reply