KLNMurthy wrote:Karan M wrote:KLN Murthy, the west sponsors folks in India who put out the messages they want, and turns around and cites those reports as being cause for concern. Lets not be naive here. The Hindu side can frame the ghar wapsi debate any which way it wants, but it is the enemy and will be treated as such. No amount of grovelling or explanations from them will work. Ultimately, its Indias weakness that we have to put up with the pomposity of Obamas who cant even address race issues in their own country, but seek to hector others. But it will change.
Does the West consist of supermen while we poor SDRE yindoos are hapless childlike targets only?
Is "grovelling explanation" the only means you can think of for influencing the narrative?
Begging your pardon, I couldn't have constructed a better example than your post to show why we keep losing the propaganda war.
It is a serious grownup business and we need to learn how to go about it.
language issues much? grovelling or explanations. not "grovelling explanations". in short, both have been tried & have limited outcomes.
Actually your defense of Obamas behavior by saying that he didnt know what he was doing and pinning it on local failure (ghar wapsi not fancily explained onlee) is an exact example of the narrative issue.
my point is even if we were to be super sophisticated about the ghar wapsi issue (and locked down the narrative on our side), it would still be spun the other way.
cut to the chase, can you admit the fact that the US and other powers use indian agencies to create a narrative which they adopt? your claim that "we are not hapless children onlee" ignores the fact that the west has had 60+ years to create their centers of influence in india & also pump in huge amounts of money dwarfing what even our allocations for ministries are, for conversion and subversion.
hey, dont take my word for it. what was undone could be redone too
http://www.sunday-guardian.com/news/oba ... odi-policy
Here you are, blaming ghar wapsi, lack of sophistication and similar stuff for the behavior of those who dominate narrative & ensure a single minded agenda is maintained.
wouldnt you agree this claim is as flawed as, hey if i started wearing better clothes and making salutes instead of tired dhotis and doing a pranam, i would be better understood. the guy who will kowtow to some arab wearing a flowing dress is doing so because latter has oil. not because of any culture, or understanding.
Instead of acknowledgwhat we are up against & changing the grounds on which the battle is fought (see pankajs's post about that) you claim we should be engaging in some "serious grownup business" by engaging in a fight where of course the rulebook and the entire narrative is being framed by the other side.
we should do our own thing & give a fig for what Obama, NYT etc think & start being ruthless about our interests. i am inclined to believe given Modis record he has no qualms in understanding whom he is dealing with & majboori main gadhe ko.. and all that. but we are under no compulsion to sugercoat the reality of obamas obnoxious behavior after he was being treated like a grade A dignitary.
that part is what i contested. you claimed they were influenced by what local groups say to make their ignorant comments. hardly, they are mendacious, and sponsor these groups to further their agenda.
if it was a PRC guy doing the same, we would have excoriated his statements.
what makes Ombaba any different? same standards.
we are a developing country and US has el power, so we have to take it on the chin. but, hey, some amount of latitude in calling it what it is, thats ok too.