India is building dams and reservoirs on Pakistani rivers

Is the water in those rivers green?
India is building dams and reservoirs on Pakistani rivers
If the British friends just stopped readmitting any of their citizens who traveled to Pakistan, there would be no problem in Britain.arun wrote:Stop blaming Pakistan for UK terrorism - top diplomat
Vikram Dodd and Ian Cobain
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 8 September 2009 23.31 BST
Senior Pakistani sources have accused Britain of failing to do enough to tackle home-grown terrorists and maintain they are falsely being blamed for harbouring extremists plotting to attack the UK.
A senior Pakistan diplomat told the Guardian that his country was being treated as a "whipping boy" by Britain. The terrorists, including those convicted on Monday for the airlines plot, were "born and brought up" in Britain, not Pakistan, he said. ........................
In a calculated move, a senior Pakistani diplomat in London hit back, saying :
"Sometimes for our British friends the truth is bitter. We have somehow turned out to be a whipping boy, there is a long history to that. The British need to search their own house. Britain has to take responsibility and they have to look into the issues which are driving these youth to extremism, which is the third-generation British – they weren't born and bought up in Pakistan." .........................
Guardian
Sometime back, Shahid Javed Burke wrote an op-ed in DAWN, from which I quote relevant portion below:Philip wrote: . . .in the fullness of time,Pakistan would be drawn closer to India thanks to cultural and business connections.This was what "haunted" the rulers of Pak and explains why a policy of hatred towards India is practised to this day.Once a genuine peace is established between the two countries,India will inevitably consume Pak not by force.For Pakistan to exist,it neccessarily has to "hate" India. India is the bogeyman of Pak without which it cannot survive!
In its original form, Pakistan was perhaps a non-sustainable political creation. It was an artifact that responded to a particular situation that developed under the long British rule.There is no reason why the two ‘wings’ of the country should have stayed together. The very fact that they were called ‘wings’ suggested that the country’s body existed somewhere else. It is legitimate to ask the question: what is now the idea of Pakistan. Institutional economics — a relatively new discipline pioneered by Douglass North, the Nobel Prize-winning economist — postulates that a great deal of human activity is governed by what it calls belief systems. These systems are the product of historical accumulation. They are not static but, instead, are exceptionally dynamic. The creation of Pakistan was indeed based on an idea — Jinnah’s two-nation theory — but many years have elapsed since that postulate was first put forward. The concept that Pakistan was needed to preserve the separate identity of the Muslim community of British India, may not have worked to keep together the two wings of the country that were attached to the body of Hindu India. But history produces its own imperatives.Jinnah’s two-nation theory is now 70 years old. It resulted in the partition of British India and the creation of two separate political entities. One of those split into two and what was once British India is now three separate states with their own histories and their own imperatives. Two of them — Bangladesh and Pakistan — are still searching for answers that would help them forge the meaning of nationhood. How should Pakistan define itself at this critical juncture in its history? Notwithstanding the bloody campaign launched by some stateless groups, religion can’t be the basis of Pakistan’s nationhood. There are too many different interpretations of what can be called an Islamic state for Pakistan to risk its future on that concept. For the same reason, ethnicity can’t be the defining concept. We have to be pragmatic: we need to define the Pakistani identity and the Pakistani idea on the basis of geography rather than on the basis of culture and religion. What is Pakistan today is a piece of real estate occupied by more than 2.5 per cent of world’s population that must find a way of pursuing economic, political and social objectives that serve the entire citizenry. This is the only way forward.
The British and then the Americans have espoused the idea that India was never one nation.They have always portrayed Hindus particularly Brahmanas as insuffereable bigots who wanted to establish their casteist vision on muslims and even sikhs,conveniently forgetting their own viciousness.SSridhar wrote: . . .Sometime back, Shahid Javed Burke wrote an op-ed in DAWN, from which I quote relevant portion below:
In October, a new "hub and spoke" network was implemented by the Home Office to deal with visa applications which saw those from a number of countries, including Pakistan, being decided in Abu Dhabi.
Applications from Pakistan are still initially checked for fraud and forgery by entry clearance officers in Islamabad before being passed on to Abu Dhabi for a decision.
However, as a back up there is scope for officials to request a face-to-face interview if there are concerns around the application.
Between October 27 and May 31 there were 66,415 applications in Pakistan to come to the UK but officials interviewed just 29.
It emerged in July that officials also have just the equivalent of 11 minutes to check documentation because there are only 11 officers and two managers based there.
QUETTA: Hundreds of wireless sets stolen from Nato supply containers were seized during a raid on a warehouse in the provincial capital’s Spini area.
The Superintendent of Police, Saddar, Dr Farrukh, said on Wednesday that police carried out the raid after a tip-off. He said three people had been arrested.
‘Apart from wireless sets, the seized items include spare parts of wireless sets, computers and x-ray machines,’ Dr Farrukh said.
Over the past years, he said, pilferage of Nato containers was routine on the Quetta-Chaman highway. This is the biggest haul of wireless devices. The raid was conducted a day after militants burnt eight Nato tankers in Quetta.
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... stan-ss-07KARACHI: Suicides are steadily rising in Pakistan, with an estimated 6,000 to 8,000 suicides per year, according to a study at Aga Khan University (AKU).
Almost 34 per cent of the population, mostly under 30 years of age, suffer from common mental disorders and more than 90 per cent of suicides can be linked to depression, according to Dr Murad Moosa Khan, Chair and Professor, Department of Psychiatry, AKU.
Most significantly, sources claim that it was King Faisal’s outreach to Pakistan that resulted in discussions about the latter country building an atomic bomb. There is strong evidence that the Saudis offered to underwrite Pakistan’s expenses in the building of the bomb. This relationship continued apace, but after Faisal’s demise, lost its anti-imperialist hue and encouraged the spread of Wahhabism throughout Pakistan. The Saudis’ underwriting of the bomb explains why the last call the then PM Nawaz Sharif made before testing the device in 1998 was to King Fahd, and not to President Bill Clinton of the US who had been urging Pakistan not to test.
I thought mental disorders were a result of inbreedingAlmost 34 per cent of the population, mostly under 30 years of age, suffer from common mental disorders and more than 90 per cent of suicides can be linked to depression, according to Dr Murad Moosa Khan, Chair and Professor, Department of Psychiatry, AKU.
BCCI, PCB in touch to revive cricket ties
Submitted 1 hr 59 mins ago
PrintFacebookDiggStumbleUponText Size
Cricket boards of India and Pakistan are in touch to discuss resumption of bilateral cricket ties in the near future at neutral venues. Sources in the Pakistan Cricket Board told PTI that a BCCI official had spoken to PCB this week and some discussion revolved around the possibility of revival of bilateral cricket ties between the two countries. "The PCB is very keen to push this idea forward as a series against India will improve its financial health considerably and also allow it to meet its commitments with the broadcasters who are paying a lot of money for the television rights of Pakistan cricket," one source said.
Hmmm ..... one doesn't need to go beyond reading Paki newspaper headlines to conduct such a "study" ....hulaku wrote:Suicides on the rise in Pakistan
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... stan-ss-07KARACHI: Suicides are steadily rising in Pakistan, with an estimated 6,000 to 8,000 suicides per year, according to a study at Aga Khan University (AKU).
Almost 34 per cent of the population, mostly under 30 years of age, suffer from common mental disorders and more than 90 per cent of suicides can be linked to depression, according to Dr Murad Moosa Khan, Chair and Professor, Department of Psychiatry, AKU.
In the past few months, senior PCB officials have tried to revive cricketing ties with India but only received a cold response from BCCI.
However, Sharad Pawar - a former BCCI President and now an influential player in the International Cricket Council (ICC) - has been supportive of the idea of reviving Pakistan-India matches.
Sources said that Pawar, ICC's vice-president, is trying to break the ice between PCB and BCCI and is being fully backed by the ICC.
The Dubai-based ICC wants to revive cricketing ties between Pakistan and India because the two countries share one of the greatest rivalries in world cricket.
A big proof of the fact that Pakistan-India matches generate greater interest than any other cricket games can be gauged from the fact that their Champions Trophy clash at Centurion (South Africa) on September 26 is already being anticipated as the match of the elite eight-nation tournament. According to reports, so high was the demand for the Group A game, that most tickets were bought in the first few days of the sale.
Even when Pakistan and India played in a practice game at The Oval last June just before the start of the ICC World Twenty20, they were greeted by a sell-out crowd. No other game in the tournament could match the intensity generated during that encounter.
India plays a role or not, it can't do much. There is USA to save the Pakistan Army and make sure the second biggest Army in south-asia remains alive to keep the giant(India) in check.Philip wrote:India if it so wishes can play a major role in destabilising Pak if it seriously wants to do so.The fissures in Pak are widening with each day and much mischief can be organised as a catalyst for the failed state to fail.With Pak's international reputation at its lowest level ever,thanks to the spate of terror plots emanating from Pak,India can achieve much diplomatic success if it puts its mind to doing so.
An independent non-Christian country with 1.2 billion population and having fundamental capabilities to match big 3 in the world, is bigger "liability" to Anglo-saxon community. Compared to that TSPA and Afghanistan put together, is much smaller liability or rather "opportunity" to viably use them as stick against this giant.ramana wrote:What if there is a splitin the Anglo Saxon community about the viability vs liability of the TSPA?
Looks like India built dams in Pakistan.archan wrote:India is building dams and reservoirs on Pakistani rivers![]()
Is the water in those rivers green?
The third, by deduction, is that the ambient dysfunction of Islamabad's relationship with New Delhi and with Iran needs to be moderated. With India, in particular, Pakistan needs to get real. It needs to stop pretending that Kashmir is still the core bilateral bone of contention, because it is not. The core bone of contention between Islamabad and New Delhi now, whether either side is able to admit it or not, is Afghanistan.
State capacity, in the minds of many Pakistanis at least, is the real reason why former State Department tough guy Richard Armitage never could have lived up to his alleged threat to former President Musharraf to bomb Pakistan back to the stone age, in those heady days following 9/11. Of course, since 2001 Pakistani state capacity has been exposed for what it is--an enormous and glimmering heap of unrealized potential that has more loose ends than there are counters. The dapper suits, Cambridge accents and razor-sharp wit of its landed politicians, its privileged civil servants, and its Sandhurst-esque generals, all produce the mirage of a Pakistan that is much more capable of both damaging and fixing things than it really is.
Commodore (r) Pervez Iqbal (Sept 9) must be truly a gentleman for admitting that the people in the military do use the phrase for those who are not one of them. I also appreciate the quality of their training and upbringing of their officers. But despite all the training and tall claims of character-building how come buccaneers of the likes of Yahya, Ziaul Haq, Aslam Beg and Musharraf all become four-star generals and take their turns in demolishing the vital institutions of the country?
Second, who can deny that the half a million gentlemen own resources of the country much more than their due share? And third, under what law are lands leased to the armed forces by the provincial governments for specific purposes like defence converted into lucrative housing societies? This method of enrichment happens nowhere else in the world. To attain the respectability of being the most honoured institution of the country -- something it enjoyed during the 1965 war -- the serving gentlemen should take oath not to obey any unconstitutional and illegal order. That day onwards the nation will salute them.
Another bloody civilian
Islamabad
The easiest option is to modify the existing fleet of conventional submarines. The most potent submarine with the Pakistan Navy fleet at the moment is the French Agosta-90B. One of the Agosta-90Bs, the PNS Hamza, is equipped with an air-independent propulsion system, which enables the submarine to remain submerged for longer periods.
Currently, Pakistan is the only country in South Asia in possession of a submarine with air-independent propulsion. With a few modifications to its torpedo tubes — they are already capable of launching Exocet missiles — the PN can launch nuclear cruise missiles. That would provide an instant second-strike capability.
Compared to nuclear submarines, conventional submarines are smaller, more manoeuvrable, quieter and more capable of underwater offensives against adversaries. The flip side is that conventional submarines are marred by lesser range and limited submersion endurance time. This, however, should be viewed in the context of PN’s modest regional ambitions, limited to brown waters only.
Arihant will carry the K-15 Sagarika, a submarine-based ballistic missile with a 700-km range. If Pakistan is able to equip its Agosta-90Bs with cruise missiles, e.g. the Babur cruise missile with a 500-km to 750-km range, then it can match India. Both submarines will require similar distance to carry out a nuclear strike. If Pakistan can meet the technological challenges, this capability could be achieved even before Arihant’s reactor goes critical and the Sagarika missiles become operational.
In that scenario, Pakistan can have assured second-strike capability before the Indians.
But this assurance would be limited and may last only till Arihant becomes operational. A submarine with longer range and greater endurance under water is necessary for a credible assured second-strike capability. Pakistan will thus require a nuclear submarine at some point.
For an easier way out, Pakistan can opt for the second option, i.e. removal of the air-independent propulsion system and the diesel engine on the Agosta-90B and make room for a miniaturised nuclear reactor, thereby increasing the range of the Agosta-90Bs and enabling them to stay underwater for longer periods. Theoretically, this option is possible, but literature does not indicate if any state has attempted such an experiment.
That said, the French Rubis Class nuclear submarine could be an inspiration in this context: it is the most compact nuclear submarine ever built, almost the same size as Pakistan’s Agosta-90Bs.
The challenge in resorting to the above option is miniaturising the nuclear reactor, which should be small enough to fit into the slim frame of the Agosta-90B. If Pakistan does overcome this challenge, it would be illogical not to develop a nuclear submarine capable of launching ballistic missiles.
Indo-Pak foreign secretaries, ministers to meet in New YorkISLAMABAD: In a rare gesture of goodwill, ISI Director General Lt Gen Shuja Pasha attended an Iftar-dinner hosted by Indian High Commissioner Sharat Sabharwal on Thursday. Pasha – the highest-ranking Pakistani official in attendance at the dinner – is the first serving ISI chief to have attended such an event hosted by the Indian High Commission. The Indian high commissioner received Pasha on arrival, saying, “I am glad to see you here.” Responding to the high commissioner’s remarks, the ISI chief said, “I always accept invitations, and I like to have more interactions.” Diplomatic sources said the presence of the ISI DG at the dinner could lead to hope intelligence officials of the two countries might review “the policy of sworn hostility” towards each other.
NEW DELHI: New Delhi announced on Thursday that the foreign minister and secretaries of India and Pakistan would meet in New York on the sidelines of the United Nations summit later this month.
The former president has chosen a simple apartment in a red-brick complex to retire in. It is a contrast to the pomp of Musharraf's nine-year rule in Pakistan, during which he was guarded by liveried soldiers and surrounded by political acolytes, the report says.
However, security remains tight at his £1 million London flat. The retired general is guarded by a small team of retired Pakistani commandos, which he pays for himself, and has a protection detail from Scotland Yard, the report adds.
He is said to dine regularly at the Dorchester hotel and hosts regular music evenings at his apartment. He regularly plays golf and often plays bridge with his confidante, Brigadier Niaz Ahmed, a retired arms dealer.
It is claimed that the general, who resigned 13 months ago, is better served by being out of Pakistan. The report also says Musharraf pays £450 to hire an official VIP lounge every time he flies from or to Heathrow airport.
The report also says Musharraf travels in a bulletproof vehicle.
Lord Nazir Ahmed, a critic in the House of Lords, tabled a parliamentary question about the cost of these security arrangements in July.
The government replied that it was the ‘established Home Office policy not to comment on protective security arrangements and their related costs’.
Nazir said ‘our old age pensioners don't get security, so how can we pay for an old general who wants to enjoy himself in London?’
The Pakistan-born peer said he was collecting evidence for a possible war crimes prosecution through Bindmans solicitors, who pursued the retired Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet through the British courts in the late 1990s.
It is claimed that Musharraf is on a visitor's visa and it has been reported that he intends to take up permanent residence in the Middle East or in the United States, where his son Bilal lives, the report said.
50/50 Chance he is coming to SFO Bay Area."It is claimed that Musharraf is on a visitor's visa and it has been reported that he intends to take up permanent residence in the Middle East or in the United States, where his son Bilal lives, the report said. [/b]
pgbhat wrote:Second-strike challenges ---- Ahmed Ali ShahFor an easier way out, Pakistan can opt for the second option, i.e. removal of the air-independent propulsion system and the diesel engine on the Agosta-90B and make room for a miniaturised nuclear reactor, thereby increasing the range of the Agosta-90Bs and enabling them to stay underwater for longer periods.
Pervez Musharraf: £25,000 to protect him at London dinners
Pervez Musharraf, the former President of Pakistan who is living in London, is being protected by Scotland Yard at a cost to taxpayers of approximately £25,000 a day.
The Metropolitan Police Specialist Protection Unit, known as SO1, has assigned a round-the-clock team of at least ten men and women to protect Mr Musharraf, who lives in a three-bedroom flat in West London. .........................
Times Online
The last time Pakistan went to the ICJ in 2000 and lost because of the problem of the Optional Clause — does the respondent state want to be prosecuted? — it had to pay cost of the ICJ judges fees plus the cost of the session and fees of the respondent’s lawyers in addition to its own lawyers.
Meanwhile, the government is contemplating launching a publicity blitzkrieg in Pakistani media about the activities of the terrorists belonging to that country in India. The campaign could be in the form of advertisement.
Wow. advertising cam-pain, eh? Really, now. Truth is stranger than fiction == reality is stranger than the benis thread.pgbhat wrote:Chidambaram gives list of 70 Pak terrorists to US
[{i]At least the GoI is doing something. Anything. Better than doing nothing, no?}[/i]
Meanwhile, the government is contemplating launching a publicity blitzkrieg in Pakistani media about the activities of the terrorists belonging to that country in India. The campaign could be in the form of advertisement.