Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 2011

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13257
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Lalmohan »

^^^ well if they threw away the walkie talkie where they entered the base... one wonders if they had all their brain cells or not...
and as for the rare explosive... perhaps it is available to TSP-Forces?
Atri
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4153
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 21:07

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Atri »

AoA.. 72...
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Suppiah »

AOA AOA again...thread recycled already, why is it not being locked :twisted: :-? :-?
Atri
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4153
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 21:07

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Atri »

Thij ij the besht moment to increase jour bost count permanently, suppiah mullah.. unlike qadiani IB4TL dhagas which are washed away into pakhana, the pure dhaga ishtays and ishtays... IB4TL onlee..
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Suppiah »

Thanks sir...IB4TL onlee also onlee
GuruPrabhu
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 01 Apr 2008 03:32
Location: Thrissur, Kerala 59.93.8.169

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by GuruPrabhu »

^^^ The biskoot is served already. They are waiting for chai.
Shaashtanga
BRFite
Posts: 204
Joined: 07 May 2011 06:43
Location: Canuckistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Shaashtanga »

IB4TL
Sagrawal
BRFite
Posts: 156
Joined: 08 Jan 2010 14:33

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Sagrawal »

AoA. 72, AK phyrrrrr IB4TL
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by shravan »

Raghavendra
BRFite
Posts: 1252
Joined: 11 Mar 2008 19:07
Location: Fishing in Sadhanakere

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Raghavendra »

I hereby lock this thread :mrgreen:
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13536
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by A_Gupta »

In 1945 who did foresee the violence of Partition?

Another storm due to the Pakistan idea is headed our way. Some BRFers see it. Cassandras they may be, but this time no one should be able to say there was no warning!
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2197
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Shrinivasan »

Kapil wrote:8) Look in the centre of the table-- Afghani Badam and American branded Bottled water!
Nope, Bailey is SDRE onlee...
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 886
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Narad »

Well, Just in Time..

AoA and IB4TL :D
Mahendra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4416
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 17:20
Location: Chronicling Bakistan's Tryst with Dysentery

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Mahendra »

72
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9419
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by vijayk »

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mixed-signals/796975/

Mixed Signals

Hard to believe this is from DDM....
Finally, there are those elements that Washington continues to give credence to, or at least leave unquestioned: Pakistan’s insecurities are legitimately propelled by fears of encirclement, India’s growing resource base, its nuclear weapons programme, and its reported “Cold Start” doctrine, thus adequately justify Pakistan’s inordinate military spending, greater investments in its nuclear and missile programmes, and support for terror groups targeting India and Afghanistan. That lasting peace between India and Pakistan and the settlement of the Kashmir dispute to Pakistan’s satisfaction will almost entirely eliminate its insecurities. That the army remains the only secular institution in Pakistan that “works” and is therefore deserving of support. And that Pakistan’s top military and intelligence officials bear little or no responsibility for the actions of their subordinates and affiliates, a claim even less credible given revelations from the ongoing trial of Tahawwur Rana and the testimony of David Coleman Headley. The erroneous conclusion drawn by the Obama administration from such questionable assumptions is that demonstrations of Indian magnanimity will allow Pakistan’s misguided, but not necessarily malevolent, security forces to reallocate resources towards improving the country’s security and economy.

Responding to Pakistan’s narrative requires an important cognitive leap, one that most in Washington are still reluctant to take: Pakistan’s purported obsessions and insecurities are self-inflicted, created and consistently advanced to serve important private interests, almost always to the detriment of the country and its people. This applies equally to all the challenges commonly associated with Pakistan, be it the military’s political preponderance, the proliferation of nuclear technology and materials, the cultivation and use of terrorist proxies against both adversaries and nominal allies, the growing radicalisation of the body politic, and periodic India-Pakistan crises. There is also little clarity regarding Pakistani pleas for a long-term strategic relationship, which it professes to desire as a symbol of legitimacy, but also works to undermine through its transactional demands and poorly concealed enthusiasm for a hasty US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Although the US is using bin Laden’s whereabouts as leverage to extract short-term concessions, it remains unwilling to recognise the centrality of Pakistan’s self-defeating narrative and the dire need for its complete reversal, absent which the multifarious challenges associated with Pakistan are unlikely to be meaningfully addressed. This, in turn, necessitates the coordinated advancement of a counter-narrative by states whose national security interests are compromised by Pakistani misbehaviour, including India, Afghanistan and — most importantly — the US. What must be promoted is an entirely different conception of Pakistan’s national interest, including its self-identification as a non-revisionist and peaceful state wholly responsible for its own behaviour and well-being. Based on the mixed signals from Washington, it is unclear whether even the dramatic circumstances of bin Laden’s death will produce that desirable outcome.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by shiv »

chetak wrote: The body language says it all. Except for one paki who seems to be grinning (in a sheepish "I have gas" way), all others have this fatalistic look. Their leader is even glowering at his counterpart. Compare that to the body language of the Indians.
Their guy in the grey suit looks familiar ( and positively constipated.)[/quote]

Not only do the kafirs have evil smirks on their faces - one of them is consulting the chief of saffron on the cellphone.
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1887
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by VikramS »

This is one thread which needs to be saved...
anchal
BRFite
Posts: 227
Joined: 01 Aug 2009 16:41

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by anchal »

72!! May Pakis rot in hell!
GuruPrabhu
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 01 Apr 2008 03:32
Location: Thrissur, Kerala 59.93.8.169

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by GuruPrabhu »

IB4TL -- LOL
Kapil
Webmaster BR
Posts: 282
Joined: 16 Jun 2001 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Kapil »

Cheenum wrote:
Nope, Bailey is SDRE onlee...
Err, that is Kinley,a brand owned by the Coca Cola company
Anantha
BRFite
Posts: 1351
Joined: 25 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: US

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Anantha »

To all pakis (with due apologies to one Mr. Asad who wrote the original)
Tum jiyo Bahataar saal (72)
Har saal ke din ho Bahattar (72) (total earth years 51, 1998 signifies the start of breakup of Pakiland)
Har din baje bum bahatter (72)
Har bum mein mare bahattar (72)
chaanakya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9513
Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by chaanakya »

IB4TL
May God give 72 to all Pakis
amdavadi
BRFite
Posts: 1489
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by amdavadi »

whose that guy in white in the middle? looks like a Referee,and looks like he has whisle around his neck? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
KrishG
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 1290
Joined: 25 Nov 2008 20:43
Location: Land of Trala-la

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by KrishG »

just in time!! AK Phyrr!! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Altair
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2620
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 12:51
Location: Hovering over Pak Airspace in AWACS

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Altair »

AoA! 3 weeks for 72 pages.
Admins: Is this a record???
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by shiv »

Altair wrote:AoA! 3 weeks for 72 pages.
Admins: Is this a record???
and 100,000 plus views in those 3 weeks

IB4TL
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 8, 201

Post by Nandu »

AoA. Congratulations to the Paki thread for reaching its 72. May the country soon follow suit.

IB4TL
Locked