Well as per the TV there is one now.jamwal wrote:What bridge ? There is no bridge at Lakhanpur crossing

Well as per the TV there is one now.jamwal wrote:What bridge ? There is no bridge at Lakhanpur crossing
Your attacks on BJP diverts attention from the scams.Vivek Raghuvanshi wrote:The Tri color flag march in J&K also diverts attention from the scams.
Should not the BJP focus on scams and that way come to power?
Neela wrote:-----------Waving the white flag at Breaper --------------
Google Maps: Madhopur in Jammu and Kashmir - on the border between Punjab and Kashmir
-----------Still waving --------------
Amid high drama, the Bharatiya Janata Party’s flag yatra was stopped at the Lakhanpur border of Jammu and Kashmir with its three senior leaders being arrested even as they lashed out at the State government and the Centre for committing a “historic mistake“.
A day after being sent back from Jammu and Kashmir, senior leaders Sushma Swaraj, Arun Jaitley and Ananth Kumar tried to re-enter the State along with the Ekta Yatra being led by the party’s youth wing president Anurag Thakur but it was foiled by police which had put a barricade.
“What can be more unfortunate that those who burn the National Flag are being provided security while those holding the National Flag are being stopped,” said Ms. Swaraj as she was being arrested along with Mr. Jaitley, Mr. Kumar and Mr. Thakur on entry into Jammu and Kashmir from Punjab.
They were arrested for violating Section 144 which prohibits assembly of more than four persons at any particular place.
“What is our crime? Why are we being arrested? We have been marching peacefully,” Ms. Swaraj said while addressing thousands of party supporters.
Earlier, Ms. Swaraj and Mr. Jaitley addressed a public meeting at Madhopur on Punjab border and vowed to go ahead with the plans to to unfurl the national tricolour at Lal Chowk in Srinagar.
“Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has said if you visit the State, the separatists will be provoked. This shows the psychological surrender (by the State government) before the separatists... it is a historic mistake,” Mr. Jaitley, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said.
Later, a group of activists were seen crossing the bridge on the Ravi river on the Punjab-J&K border where they were stopped by security forces.
The BJYM activists continued to shout slogans demanding that they be allowed to proceed to Srinagar to hoist the tricolour at Lal Chowk.
Mr. Jaitley said when a “group of separatists” gathered in New Delhi and made anti-India speeches, the government did not take action contending that freedom of speech was their right.
“But when we took he tricolour to unfurl it at Lal Chowk, they dub it as a crime,” he said.
For this, B. Raman replies...@ramanthink But not allowing a flag ceremony because the separatists would be demonstratitively unhappy is stretching liberalism too far.
at a particular place on a particular day? Day referred here is Republic day. Isn't is something odd coming from such people. You can either reject this a bunkum or....it is......combining with the opposition sudden burst on the Center's handling on Kashmir......is it confirms some kind of compromise being worked on?@Vikram_Sood one is not saying you can't.One is saying don't at a particular place on a particular day in interest of public order.
I have a feeling, this Gov. is going to make the Kashmir issue like Telugana.“Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has said if you visit the State, the separatists will be provoked. This shows the psychological surrender (by the State government) before the separatists... it is a historic mistake,” Mr. Jaitley, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said.
Radical Sikh activists belonging to SAD (Mann) in Amritsar on Monday showed black flags to Ekta Yatra led by Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) president and BJP MP Anurag Thakur on Monday when the march was leaving the city and heading for Srinagar. The less than a dozen activists were arrested on the spot and the Yatra continued without any interruption due to the presence of several policemen throughout the way in Amritsar.
Have you seen Nayakan, Nayak in Tamil, Telugu or Dayavan in Hindi. The hero is killed by a character whose only aim is to kill the hero (Kamal Hasan). He looks like a idiot or puppet etc. Inspite of great care that Kamal's gangs take they simply could not suspect that character. He stabs Kamal to avenge the death of this father.abhishek_sharma wrote:Muppalla guru..who are these people?
Thanks Raghavendra and Raja Ram. One thing that everyone can agree with is, this tamasha started after OA came to power.Raghavendra wrote:^Kanson read this Raja Ram's post
http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewto ... 5#p1017555
JKLF supremo Yasin Malik who has announced a parallel march to Lal Chowk on Republic Day to foil BJP’s plan to hoist the Tricolour at the square has gone into hiding. A police team, which raided his house at Maisuma, located a little distance away to the north-west of Lal Chowk, did not find him there.
In a statement, Malik has said he will lead a march to the square on January 26 and unfurl the JKLF flag. “ In the garb of flag hoisting, BJP is preparing to launch an assault on Valley. But we will not let the party succeed,” Malik said. “Our programme for January 26 would be go ahead at all costs.”
However, Malik said that JKLF would give a befitting reply to BJP “strictly within the parameters of democratic principles and non-violence” . “By peacefully resisting BJP plan we want to send a message to the people in India that Kashmir is a disputed state and that only its solution would guarantee peace and prosperity in the subcontinent,”Malik said.
Malik’s march has been supported by the moderate Hurriyat leader Bilal Gani Lone who has said that BJP wanted to create trouble in the state.
Surprisingly, hardline Hurriyat Conference Syed Ali Geelani has said: To raise a flag amidst the protection of six lakh troops is no courageous act. Our stand is that this (flag raising) will make no difference to the status of Kashmir problem which will be there after BJP goes back.”
Agreed. Not just a troll though but a sophisticated operator. Always jumps in when the Congress or dear leader MMS is under attack on the forum. Long mails full of "==" and patronizing statements about not being partisan, lets not be simplistic etc in the same breath. Not really hard to make out where political loyalties are. Also, expect whenever you speak your mind regarding dear leader, to have complaints made re: Mods on how parochial/disrespectful to PM etc you are from other fellow followers.Marten wrote:It is time you apply the troll filter. No point letting a troll fill up the pages. He's already clarified his sojourn here was "30 minutes time pass". Ergo, your reaction is your problem, and his posts are the admins'.
My local vernacular daily had already reported this two days back. This was when the BJP leaders from Kashmir was picked up as part of preventive detention. So looks like Yasin Malik had bolted (or allowed to bolt) much before the crack-down on BJP workers began. And since he is absconding we should watch out for some more of his dramas.Theo_Fidel wrote:Crackdown on parallel march, Yasin Malik goes into hiding
I dont think so. What BJP wants is very different. I saw this interview with Omar Abdullah on this Yatra business and I agree with his reasoning of why the BJP is doing this in response to a question and why it is not the time or season to pushing such kind of agendas on Kashmir.RamaY wrote:I want India to win, and I think that is what BJP wants too.
Noticed that the INC brigade did not answer one interesting Q raised by Rudradev earlier ( have quoted it above). Could anyone of the worthies kindly provide a answer to the above since a reply to this question sums up the thought process/neutrality of the theories being peddled here...Just as a hypothetical case study:
Let us say the Shiv Sena is upset about something and does a lot of bus-burning and stone throwing one particular week, in Mumbai.
The next week is Moharram. Shi'a Muslim citizens of India exercise their fundamental right by taking out a procession. Suddenly, Shiv Sainiks fall on the procession with bottles and stones and knives, killing many of the devotees. After this the Sena engages in street battles with Muslims and against the police, torching shops, vandalizing homes and places of business. Many lives are lost.
So in this situation, to the respected posters quoted above: What is the correct application of law and order?
Should Moharram processions be banned in following years, just in case the Shiv Sena gets some khujli a few weeks ahead of time and therefore might use Moharram as a pretext to commit violence and vandalism?
Should the right of the Moharram devotees to engage in religious ceremonial procession be abrogated, because there is a "fear" of "violence and disorder" by Shiv Sena vandals breaking the law?
That is the sad part. It is not as if the GoI/OA are trying to steal the limelight by getting someone of their guys to hoist the tri-colour...ravi_ku wrote:Vina,
OA and congress could have taken the wind out of this agitation by asking the CRPF to raise the flag which was done all through these "some seriously perilous situation" years but not done in the "most peaceful year" (until the amarnath agitations).
<CT Alert>RamaY wrote:A vacuum bulb exploded in my brain!!!
INC truly chanikyan?
Do they want Cashmiris to taste the just governance that Pakistan offers? How long will it take before Cashmir experiences the wonderful life of Pakis with those daily doses of vacuum bulb explosions, bumping of blasphemers (Yasin Malik with his Gandhism), and Fridin dhamakas in shrines and mosques?
How long will it take for OA to be labeled as a blasphemer in a Paki cashmir?
Easy answer. Moharram procession is not a "fundamental right". Even if it were, it is not absolute and subject to public order, public health , "morality" etc. In a tense , surcharge situation where there is a possibility of peace being disturbed, the right can be abridge and any administration worth it's salt will abridge it for that particular occasion. Notice that it doesn't mean that the procession is banned for the next years or the years hence, if the situation does not warrant such a thing.Just as a hypothetical case study:
The next week is Moharram. Shi'a Muslim citizens of India exercise their fundamental right by taking out a procession. ..
Arun Jaitley is a hot shot lawyer. Why doesn't he challenge the gov'ts action in the supreme court. He won't coz he knows he will lose. The govt is well within the law on this.ravi_ku wrote:When the main opposition party leaders are not allowed to enter a state, what kind of kangaroo democracy is this?
Basically, if the lunatic Hindu residents of that area get into riot mode just a week before the Muharram procession every year, we will not have a Muharram procession ever.Moharram procession is not a "fundamental right". Even if it were, it is not absolute and subject to public order, public health , "morality" etc. In a tense , surcharge situation where there is a possibility of peace being disturbed, the right can be abridge and any administration worth it's salt will abridge it for that particular occasion. Notice that it doesn't mean that the procession is banned for the next years or the years hence, if the situation does not warrant such a thing.
This is a hypothetical case only. The true colors come only when it materializes. Until then the standard answer of [sic] seculars would be "Moharram will be banned" because they know that the situation will never arise.Just as a hypothetical case study:
Let us say the Shiv Sena is upset about something and does a lot of bus-burning and stone throwing one particular week, in Mumbai.
The next week is Moharram. Shi'a Muslim citizens of India exercise their fundamental right by taking out a procession. Suddenly, Shiv Sainiks fall on the procession with bottles and stones and knives, killing many of the devotees. After this the Sena engages in street battles with Muslims and against the police, torching shops, vandalizing homes and places of business. Many lives are lost.
So in this situation, to the respected posters quoted above: What is the correct application of law and order?
Should Moharram processions be banned in following years, just in case the Shiv Sena gets some khujli a few weeks ahead of time and therefore might use Moharram as a pretext to commit violence and vandalism?
Should the right of the Moharram devotees to engage in religious ceremonial procession be abrogated, because there is a "fear" of "violence and disorder" by Shiv Sena vandals breaking the law?