Looking at chaps like these no wonder NaMo can’t sleep at night. His G20 Bakchodi has gone too far and is looking for some $$ jobs.
Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49Right. And before Lord Ram, there was no Diwali. So we can't say Diwali is intrinsic to Hindu culture.S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Pakis blaming Diwali in India for pollution in Lahore. Presstitutes in India take money to do propaganda against Indian festivals, which is then promptly picked up by other countries to smear Indian culture and society. Times of India is the main culprit in anti-Diwali propaganda.
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/d ... 2025-10-21
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/d ... 2025-10-21
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
isubodh ji,
but when people get selective in their criticism than a firm boot to the butt is more than deserved
why do such people only find their voices during specific festivals, while remaining as quiet as church mouses during other festivals
not a word about the parali burning (among other things...) from this sanctimonious environmental mahatma
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
News about Parali burning is deliberately being suppressed in media to lay full blame of pollution on Diwali. There seems to be a full campaign going on funded by church money
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
Not true, isubodh ji.
There is ample evidence to the contrary
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 957
- Joined: 27 Mar 2019 18:15
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49The word is “controlled” not “banned” . I dont like crackers going on at ungodly hours and i dont like azaan either on loudspeakers. And G20 Kant has suddenly started polishing his environment credentials. In X people have started taking PETA to task on Id as well..S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.