Suraj wrote:What distinguishes stagflation from hyperinflation, according to you ? I agree with stagflationary conditions - they are already present. But hyperinflation ? That takes a very particular form of breakdown of society to happen - natural disasters, wars, or similar calamity. Fear-mongering about it is not particularly meaningful rhetoric.
I am not fear mongering., but market has panicked - why? What is spooking the market? Neither do I want the Indian economy to be in stagflationary or hyper-inflationary condition. But calling out what spooking the market which will lead to the next bad situation is not "fear mongering". The "fear" has already been "mongered" into the markets. Yesterdays' slump may be followed today by a calm., but if there is already fear of Rs. plumbing 75/- to a dollar.
And I did call out that we are entering into stagflationary conditions several months back. And I am calling out that "HyperInflation" is a real and present danger.
And I am neither a PChaddi in eCONomics neither I took a degree in any of its subject. Only thing I can do and not to very well is add, subtract, divide and multiply. So here is my #pappu logic:
Now, coming to the question is why I think "HyperInflation" will set in., it is just that India does not have enough forex reserves to fund itself out of stagnancy. Basically with no growth, there is simple not much of goods produced in India that it can sell to buy stuff to produce more goods and consume some more.
For eg. if you are expending energy to produce a good (food, medicine, consumable like a refrigerator part)., you have to fund the purchase of that energy. The output (goods) should cover for the purchase of that energy plus earn some more to be ploughed back in to purchase more goods. That is a virtuous cycle. If you are coming out even, you are stagnant - it does not hurt - but as the demand for more of such goods goes up (people wanting more food or medicine) - inflation sets in.
Now imagine a situation where you are not even producing more of that good - the demand is highest and the supply is non-existent - logic tells hyperinflation will set in.
Again HyperInflation setting in say "choice" goods is not a problem. For example if the LED TV prices keep on shooting up and up and up, people will just stop buying LED tvs and settle on CRT and navigate from there. In this case LED TV is a "choice" that can be foregone.
But HyperInflation setting in food, medicine, clothing & housing - that is a problem. You cannot avoid any of that. For housing you may move from Metro to B-Town or back to village - if you can., but to get the goods there you need infrastructure. But if you do not have infrastructure, the same goods is now going to cost more (why do you think poor Indians move from villages to towns and cities? if the goods/services do not come to them - they go to goods and services)
Input costs to food is directly dependent upon the oil price (fertilizer etc)., and if you subsidize the input costs, your deficit balloons - which means you will have to fund the deficit somehow - by further borrowing which will shoot up your interest, which in turn will shoot up your inflation.
Medicines and plastics are directly dependent upon the oil price (all modern pharmaceuticals can be traced back to the oil barrel).
That leaves clothing and housing. Taking out artificial fibers, you are still left with producing the cotton to yarn to textiles - which are dependent again on your input cost. Housing the less said the better - the prices are sky high already in B'gluru and Chennai and B'bay and Delhi and Gurgaon, so much so that even B-Towns are now seeing higher price rises. Partly people are speculating and putting money in housing and if not into Gold.
Note, to me the collapse of industries are visible signs of HyperInflation, they follow the HI, but not precede it. Yes certain things can trigger HI (Chinese incursion, Baki Terrorism)., but it is like an oil keg waiting to be lighted - only the spark is needed.
If growth is high, low inflation (goldilocks economy)
If growth is high, high inflation (growing but inefficient economy)
If growth is low/zero, high inflation (stagflation)
If growth is negative and persistent inflation (low or med or high), what do you call? What will consistent negative growth lead to? Depression (low inflation)? Hyper inflation (negative growth high inflation?)