Geopolitical thread

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4080
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Lilo »

habal wrote:the 'west' as backup plans has deployed weapons in outer space. There are beam weapons that send directed electromagnetic pulses and can destroy any target on earth. ...
^^ Saar ,
I will discount much of your above post except the lines quoted above . There is nothing "non-human" about ANY tech deployed by the West even for its "testing purpose" in its wars. Unless if you refer to some Artificial Intelligence based super computers as "Non Human" .

Anyway, below quoted are the russian goals to catchup with the West from where they left the fight in the 80s - the failed Polyus payload on energia was in their last major attempt at installing a directed energy system in space.
Russia Eyes Development of Futuristic Weaponry - Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov

Proposals for the development of weaponry based on futuristic concepts will be ready by December this year to be included in the next state arms procurement program, Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov said on Thursday.
“The development of weaponry based on new physics principles; direct-energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons, psychotronic weapons, etc., is part of the state arms procurement program for 2011-2020,” Serdyukov said at a meeting with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.
In 80s, while FSU was collapsing West continued its illegal weaponisation (actually its not illegal until some one with capability points out - none want to do it currently) of space and even propaganda articles hailing its space weapons capabilities dried up (as there is no opposing power to direct the propaganda against) - the current extent of West's space weapon capability is thus a direct extrapolation of its capabilities of 80s under the inputs from the general scientific advances which happened in the past 20 years. Russia and China are now playing catch up . I dont believe china's space scramble and its focus on superheavy LVs is for propagandu purposes onlee.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by habal »

they are very busy in outer space. Alliances have already been formed and opposite camp has been identified and is being repelled and here we are still in hain jee, aisa kaise ho sakta hain stage with hain jee aisa to nahin ho sakta rejoinders ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayyj1pYjuD4

also this is Russian state TV documentary.
skip the first 15 mins.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrjXmDlAYzo

with subtitles for missing parts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYY68vI7vzU

after 40 mins the conclusion of the documentary is thus:
The development of the technologies made a huge leap within the second half of this century.
Such a rapid development of technology is very difficult to be explained
by the race of human imagination OR by high competition (competitiveness) in the market.
It's quite sure that many products in the computer science of medical industry
Could not be made by the writers of science fiction
Or from stories of UFO eyewitnesses. (sic)

In those inhabited facilities, the advanced civlizations transfer their own experience
They also transmit information to most developed countries on earth.
Like USA, England, France, China

There is also another part behind this game and mystery
All of this requires the attention of secret services and groups around them
where huge amounts of money is involved
Studies made by ufologists and long term analysis have shown
why humanity is frightened by the presence of these UFO's ?
Flying saucers are often seen taking cubic meters of water
and tons of minerals are disappearing from there.
In USA there was a period when lot of dead animals and slaughtered cows
were found.
Although on our planet there are millions of eyewitnesses who have seen
many acitivities in the night, still no one believes them.

What are they getting in return ?
Wireless internet?
Smart contact lenses?
Nano robots and sensor displays?

It seems everything they ask
just so we could fly to space

It seems politicians as well as military are not interested into people
knowing the truth, same as the extra terrestrial civilizations.
who are using them to drain our resources, materials and get whatever
they need.

here is russian presidents comments regarding same with reference to above russian documentary. He is serious and not joking about what he says.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHCSpm2kepo
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by svinayak »

Which planet are we talking about?
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by habal »

Prison Planet.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by RajeshA »

Published on Mar 01, 2013
By Raymond Buchanan
Scottish independence: How do you defend a small country?: BBC
Ole Kværnø is director of strategy at the Royal Danish Defence College. He told BBC Scotland: "Our vision is by no means to defend ourselves. We, as a state, are no longer able to defend ourselves in military terms."

He says there is no direct threat to Denmark and they can also rely on their partners in Nato.

Mr Kværnø went on: "So our investment is not in our direct and own defence but rather in keeping our preferred partners happy so that they will come to our rescue at the end of the day".

And one way Denmark keeps the US happy is by allowing them access to Greenland whose defence and foreign affairs are controlled in Copenhagen.

Mr Kværnø said: "Greenland is absolutely necessary for the Americans to be able to set up their missile defence shield.

"If they don't have the radar system up at Thule they can't work it and that gives us the reassurance that we can constantly trade with the Americans in terms of security favours."

'A disgrace'

But in recent years Denmark has offered more than just radar facilities.

Danes have fought and died in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Søren Espersen is foreign affairs spokesman for the Danish People's Party.

His party helped support the last Danish government which sent forces into both conflicts.

He told the BBC: "I think we feel that we have to do our bit.

"I can't really see why it should always be British and American soldiers that should die whereas other nations would sit on their hands like indeed many of the European countries do. Members of the EU who don't lift a finger - I think that is a disgrace."

But outside parliament there is a one man anti-war protest. Peter has been demonstrating here since Danish soldiers first entered Afghanistan more than a decade ago.

Denmark cannot interfere in others' nuclear policy, Dyrby Paulsen says

He said: "Here I am protesting against the war in Afghanistan. Today we can say that the Taliban is nearly just as strong as they were when we started."

Danish soldiers are due to leave Afghanistan next year.

But what of another area of contention - nuclear weapons?

Ole Kværnø says it is "the elephant in the room, we just don't discuss it at the moment."

The Danish government oppose nuclear weapons but do not question whether their Nato allies sail nuclear armed submarines in their waters.

That was one of the controversies at the last SNP conference which saw the party adopt a pro-Nato stance.

Mr Kværnø says that ignoring the issue is a matter of military practicality.

He said: "I can't see a member of Nato taking a firm stance on a nuclear free zone in, for example, the North Atlantic or around Scottish waters. That would be difficult."

John Dyrby Paulsen represents the Social Democrats who lead the current Danish government.

He says Denmark cannot interfere in the nuclear policies of other nations.

He said: "We are a small country. We can't decide what big countries want to do.

"Nuclear disarmament for instance, we have to say that we support it but we can't decide on nuclear policy. Especially not in France, US or England, on what they want to do.

"We have a certain point of view on that one but we don't interfere with big countries."
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60311
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by ramana »

Our RVaidyaji uvacha:
As Europe goes down, we need to be prepared for consequences by "Vaidyanathan R"

Message
1
As Europe goes down, we need to be prepared for consequences
Mon Mar 4, 2013 6:12 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Vaidyanathan R"


http://prof- vaidyanathan. com/2013/ 03/04/as- europe-goes-down-we-need-to-b
e-prepared-for- consequences/

As Europe goes down, we need to be prepared for consequences

March 4, 2013 * by Prof Vaidyanathan
http://prof- vaidyanathan. com/author/ greenchilli/> * in Economy
http://prof- vaidyanathan. com/category/ theams/economy/> , Globalization
http://prof- vaidyanathan. com/category/ theams/globalisa tion/> ,
niticentral. com
http://prof- vaidyanathan. com/category/ newspaper- articles/ niticentral- co
m/>

http://rvaidya2000. files.wordpress. com/2013/ 03/globe- prof.jpg>

The European economic and social crisis is becoming worse with each
passing day. One business channel asked me in 2008 how long it might
take to recover and I responded saying 40 quarters - they never came
back to interview. But now I forecast it may never recover.

Sri Aurobindo said that India will rise on the ashes of western
civilisation and it seems to be coming true. It is important to
recognise that the dominance of the West has been there only for last
200 odd years. According to Angus Maddison' s pioneering OECD study,
India and China had nearly 50 per cent of global GDP as late as the
1820s. Hence India and China are not emerging or rising powers. They are
retrieving their original position. In 1990, the share of the G-7 in
world GDP (on a purchasing power parity basis) was 51 per cent and that
of emerging markets, 36 per cent. But in 2012, it is the reverse. So the
dominant west is a myth.

Europe is facing three types of crisis - economic, demographic,
civilisational and it is not in a position to come out of these. All
three are not recent ones; they were developing over a period and are
now culminating into a catastrophe
.

The Debt to GDP ratio of most of Europe is at unsustainable levels with
our own Britain having above 500 per cent - I say our own since we are
going to have to help them run their country sooner than later. There
are three major constituents of debt - Government debt, corporate debt
and household debt. Of the three, we find household debt has reached
nearly 80 to 100 per cent of GDP in most of these countries. The reason
is simple - unlike India, households in Europe and USA have forgotten
one simple word - savings. They live on debt and are interned by debt.

The situation is made worse by the unemployment situation. Youth
unemployment has reached 55 per cent in Spain and hovering above 30 per
cent in most of the other countries. Youth is defined as being between
the ages of 16 to 24, unlike in India where even a 43-year-old is a
'youth icon'. The overall unemployment is at more than 25 per cent in
most countries and it is creating social turmoil.

Along with this is the demographic crisis. The population of Europe
during the First World War was nearly 25 per cent. Today it is around 11
per cent and is expected to become 3 per cent in another 20 years. This
is mainly due to low reproductive rates and in some countries is as low
as 1 when 2.1 is considered as equilibrating rate. Europe will disappear
from the world map unless migrants from Africa and Asia take it over.
That is why Europe is being referred to as Eurobia and London as
Londonistan.

The root cause of the issue is the attempt in Europe to nationalize
families and privatize business. Old age issue/ health issues/ child
care issues are all normal family activities that have been taken over
by the state and the state is broke. Funded security schemes are facing
crisis since not enough numbers are getting in to labor force due to low
reproductive rates and unfunded
security system is in difficulty since taxes are not adequate due to low
population growth.

Coupled with economic and demographic crisis is the crisis of
civilization in Europe. It has renounced the Church and has become
secular. Church attendance has fallen significantly and churches have
become tourist attractions rather than places of worship.


Most of the migrants, particularly those doing 'brown colour work' -
like garbage removal, cleaning plates in restaurant, porter jobs, and
grape-picking - are people from Mauritania/ Somalia/ Algeria etc and
most are Muslims by faith. Due to a high degree of unemployment, there
is resentment against migrants and this anger is turning into anger
against Muslims. Added to this is the new front started by France in
Mali to fight Islamic fundamentalists. Africa may become a new Vietnam
for Europe.

Europe is sitting on a time bomb and any small spark could ignite it.
Remember that all conflicts in the last 2000 years have started in
Europe and became 'world&# 39; conflicts. India has already given $10 billion
or Rs 56,000 crore - nearly one per cent of GDP to help Europe. Not a
single European paper or leader has thanked us openly. One can only hope
that we need not give more of our GDP or become cannon fodder in
anglo-saxon conflicts.


We can never be certain about our Government. It may involve us in the
emerging conflicts since our foreign policy is generally subservient to
the anglo-saxon interests and we muddle along instead of doing strategic
thinking. The sooner we evolve a strategy, the better, and it should be
de-coupled from conflicts and focus on the eastern front.

Author is professor at IIM-Bangalore --Views are personal
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by RamaY »

The Debt to GDP ratio of most of Europe is at unsustainable levels with our own Britain having above 500 per cent - I say our own since we are going to have to help them run their country sooner than later. There are three major constituents of debt - Government debt, corporate debt and household debt. Of the three, we find household debt has reached nearly 80 to 100 per cent of GDP in most of these countries. The reason is simple - unlike India, households in Europe and USA have forgotten one simple word - savings. They live on debt and are interned by debt.
Why would he say that? What is he implying?

How will UK do this?
Will UK sell its UNSC membership? or would it trigger its agents in Indian Political/policy circles?

Can India do it?
Can India sustain the life styles of UK? at what cost? Why would it do that?

When will this happen?
Next Decade? 2050 timeframe?
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Prem »

RamaY wrote: How will UK do this?
Will UK sell its UNSC membership? or would it trigger its agents in Indian Political/policy circles?
Can India do it?
C
Need to absorb UK by 2035-2040 time frame. They all need to live Indian life style. It will be an Indian state called Paschim Pradesh . UN will be dead by then,.
Christopher Sidor
BRFite
Posts: 1435
Joined: 13 Jul 2010 11:02

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Christopher Sidor »

^^^^
One important factor that is going to hurt us this year, i.e. 2013, is the fact that EU is our biggest market. With Europe expected to be in recession for at least 2 quarters in 2013, we are going to get deeply impacted. So we need to buckle up.

Further Europe's demographics are bad. Almost as bad and as scarily as Japan or Russia. Most of the continental European countries are deeply anti-immigrants. This does not mean that Europe is in a terminally decline. With new technology like Robotics, Space based industries, Europe and Japan can very easily overcome their drawbacks. But unlike Americans who actually encourages disruptive technologies, Europeans and Japanese are pretty conservative.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60311
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by ramana »

SOmewhere I had said the same. Make the Queen the Raj Pramukh of the Island Provinces of the Raj.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by habal »

http://indrus.in/economics/2013/02/20/r ... 22375.html

Russia seeks Indian cooperation to counter space threats
As a massive rescue and clean-up operation involving about 10,000 workers of the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry continues in the Urals following Friday’s meteorite strike in Chelyabinsk region, Russia has called for an urgent international cooperation to effectively meet natural threats from space.
Meteorite explosions and fireball showers like the one in Chelyabinsk may especially prove to be very dangerous in the regions where nuclear facilities are located. Several nuclear and chemical industry facilities are located in Chelyabinsk, including the Mayak fuel processing factory and nuclear waste storage, where a nuclear accident occurred in 1957, causing massive radioactive contamination.
“We already have people who have been harmed and injured as a result of the meteorite’s fall,” Russian Academy of Sciences member, Moscow State University World Politics Department dean Andrei Kokoshin said in an interview to the Itar-Tass, following the meteorite showers, which injured thousands of people and caused huge damage to buildings and property in Chelyabinsk city.
“Should a larger celestial body hits the Earth, the effects will be far more devastating. Particularly so, if that happens in a large city. And in certain cases, as many scientists have been warning, the fall of an asteroid would spell the end of humanity,” Kokoshin said.
Kokoshin, in particular emphasised on the meteorite disaster incident, saying this is the reason why the time is ripe for not only scientists to address this issue, but also for politicians and statesmen to join their forces in this work.
“There should be concerted efforts by the international community on the basis of decisions by the leading countries of the world having the appropriate scientific knowledge and technologies, he said, adding “Such technologies do exist in Russia, the United States, China, the European Union and, to a certain extent, in India.”
Kokoshin, a former secretary of the Russian Security Council, urged the foreign countries to consider this issue in the bilateral and multilateral format.
“It is high time to create a common international centre for monitoring and responding to natural threats from space. The UN may create a special committee within its structure to coordinate efforts by UN Security Council member-states and other UN countries in that field,” he said.
According to the Russian scientists, the Chelyabinsk meteor close miss should serve as a “wake-up call” for the international community to set up a system for monitoring meteors of similar size and provide advance warnings to the population in the regions likely to be affected. Reports suggested the meteor was a tiny asteroid that released 300 to 500 kilotonnes of energy when it exploded, which is roughly equivalent to 20 atomic bombs of the type dropped on Hiroshima and Nagashaki.
It only underlined the urgency of taking measures by the international community to avoid such risky natural calamities from the space. “Today we can spot about 10 percent of such objects as the Chelyabinsk meteor in the solar system. Ninety percent go undetected and some of them may crash into Earth any moment,” Dr Oleg Malkov of the Russian Science Academy Institute of Astronomy warned.
Following the meteor incident in Chelyabinsk region, Russia lost no time to commence move to coordinate international efforts not only in multilateral format, but also in bilateral format with India and within the framework of Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral cooperation.
Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has already entrusted Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin with the responsibility of proposing ways to forecast and prevent disaster threats from space. Rogozin, who looks after Russian defence industry and space issues, is the co-chairman of the Indo-Russian Inter-Governmental Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific-Technological and Cultural Cooperation. The deep interaction that he already has with his Indian counterparts will undoubtedly enable him to expand cooperation in the field of management of disasters from space.
Reiterating his call from 2011 for an “international initiative to create a system,” to prevent space threats, Rogozin said neither Russia nor the US can prevent objects from crashing into the Earth from space. “The essence of our idea consists of joining the intellectual and technological efforts of industrial nations,” he tweeted last Sunday.
Even before the Friday’s meteorite explosion in Urals, Russia has repeatedly called for stepping up cooperation with India in high-tech areas, saying it is willing to share with her its experience in the field of space disaster management.
India and Russia have a long record of ties in preventing disasters and emergency situations. In December 2010, they inked an intergovernmental agreement on interaction in case of natural and man-made disasters.
In June 2011, during the visit of the-then Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram at the invitation of former Russian Emergency Situations Minister Sergei Shoigu, Russia and India agreed to deepen disaster management cooperation between the two countries. Russia also offered technical assistance in setting up a disaster management centre in India similar to the one it has in Moscow.
Russia has a state-of-the-art crisis control centre using sophisticated technology and GLONASS, the Russian equivalent of GPS. It keeps real time record of each and every case of accidents and disasters in the country. The centre has highly mobile infrastructure that can airlift rescue and relief teams into any part of the country within hours.
India, which has set up a National Disaster Management Authority, is also in the process of creation of such crisis control centre and can effectively utilize and gain from the Russian experience. During Chidambaram’s visit, both sides discussed the Russian proposal to set up a joint commission to implement the December 2010 intergovernmental agreement on cooperation in dealing with natural disasters, including tsunami.
Most recently, taking a step further, the two countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) during the visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to New Delhi for regular annual India-Russia summit on December 24, 2012.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, New Delhi and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd, New Delhi, and NIS-GLONASS, Russia, signed the MoU for conducting the proof of concept through pilot project for providing the Satellite based navigation services. The MoU envisages a pilot project to assess the usage of the GLONASS using the capabilities of BSNL/MTNL ground infrastructure.
Success of the pilot project may provide insights for wider applicability of GLONASS signals in the future in areas such as disaster management, telephony and long-distance communications.
Russia, India and China have already been cooperating in disaster management within the framework of RIC and Moscow is likely to propose new measures with a view to further boost collaboration between the triangular alliance to ward off threats of natural disasters from space following the recent meteorite explosions in Chelyabinsk region, sources said.
The RIC Foreign Ministers at their meeting in Moscow last April, underlined the importance of cooperation in the field of disaster management and appreciated the outcome of the trilateral programme for exchange of information and expertise on the use of geo-spatial technologies in monitoring and forecasting flood and drought, organized in Hyderabad in May 2011.
They also welcomed the outcome of the 4th Russia-India-China Trilateral Expert Meeting on Disaster Management in St Petersburg in September 2011 and identified priorities for further cooperation in the trilateral format.
Dadan Upadhyay is an Indian journalist based in Moscow.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by svinayak »

North Korea Threatens to Attack US With 'Lighter and Smaller Nukes'
New York Times - ‎13 minutes ago‎
SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea said on Tuesday that it would cut off a hot line with the United States military in South Korea, calling the truce that stopped the Korean War in 1953 null and void and threatening to strike the United States with “lighter and ...
Klaus
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2168
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 12:28
Location: Cicero Avenue

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Klaus »

RajeshA ji, if you remember our discussion on Arctic sea routes and their geopolitical significance, a few moons ago.

Ships may be able to sail over North Pole by 2050.
Researchers said it could also lead to unprecedented geo-political tensions between countries that have territorial claims in the region. Global warming will make these frigid routes much more accessible than ever imagined by melting an unprecedented amount of sea ice during the late summer, a University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) research shows.

By mid-century, even ordinary shipping vessels will be able to navigate previously inaccessible parts of the Arctic Ocean, and they will not need icebreakers to blaze their path as they do today, the researchers found.

‘We’re talking about a future in which open-water vessels will, at least during some years, be able to navigate unescorted through the Arctic, which at the moment is inconceivable,’ said co-author Scott R Stephenson.

The Arctic ice sheet is expected to thin to the point that polar icebreakers will be able to navigate between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans by making a straight shot over the North Pole, Smith and Stephenson predict.

The route directly over the North Pole is 20 per cent shorter than today’s most-trafficked Arctic shipping lane, the Northern Sea Route, which hugs the coast of Russia. For vessels travelling between Rotterdam in the Netherlands and Yokohama, Japan, the Northern Sea Route is already approximately 40 per cent shorter than the traditional route through the Suez Canal.
Lot of pointers, lessons for India and its IOR strategy. India needs to play both fields, the IOR as well as Arctic. Time for scaling up commercial ties with Russia as well as forge new ties (private firms) with Norway and Scotland.

Basically, India needs to increase its output of geophysicists, geologists, paleontologists and humanities personnel who compare with global standards and can carry out field projects in both temperate and tundra.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by RajeshA »

Klaus ji,

Yes I remember, but just to be certain I looked up the post again. Often things fall off one's radar! :|

But as you pointed out, it is the logical way to proceed. I think the gold rush is moving North! The Indians in England should reconsider moving to Scotland and other Nordic countries and leave England to become Englishstan!

Published on Nov 29, 2011
By Angus Robertson
Angus Robertson: High time to join our friends in the North and face the Arctic challenge: Scotsman
The UK has opted out of taking a serious approach to the economic and military changes the melting ice cap will bring. Scotland must not

THE seas north of Scotland are warming at an alarming rate. Recent studies show that the warming in the Arctic is occurring faster than anywhere else on the planet, and the average temperature in the region has surpassed all previous measurements in the first decade of the 21st century.

Sea ice has been shrinking, and the melting of Greenland’s ice sheet and other Arctic ice caps will contribute more and more to the rise in global sea levels.

The facts are sobering. Sea ice in the Arctic is melting faster than at any time in the past four decades. During this summer the Northwest Passage was free of ice and this trend is set to continue and become the norm.

These changes in Scotland’s back yard are significant and are accelerating. Our neighbours are at action-stations and Scottish Government ministers are thinking about the challenges as we approach the independence referendum. The massive changes impacting on the High North and Arctic will become a significant feature of the years and decades ahead. While the environmental concerns are alarming there are also significant economic opportunities and geo-strategic challenges which must be tackled.

These include oil, gas and mineral extraction and new international shipping routes. Up to 30 per cent of the world’s undiscovered gas reserves and 10 per cent of oil resources are believed to be located in the Arctic. With the opening of northern shipping lanes, vessels sailing between East Asia and Western Europe could save more than 40 per cent in transportation time and fuel costs by navigating the sea lanes north of Siberia rather than the southern route through the Suez Canal. Rising sea temperatures also mean that there are new fishing grounds.

Given all of these developments, one would imagine that the United Kingdom government would be taking this very seriously. Sadly it is not. At last week’s International Maritime Organisation assembly, the UK did not even raise the massive challenges of the northern dimension.

Amongst our neighbours the changing circumstances are however being thoroughly considered. Given the national priorities at play they are keen to ensure stability in the region, which necessitates ecological, economic, diplomatic and defence cooperation and understanding.

All of this explains why the countries adjoining the Arctic are taking the issues very seriously. Norway, Denmark, Russia, Canada and the United States have all developed specific policy priorities for the High North and Arctic. Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands consider this a top priority as do nations like Sweden and Finland.

Last week in Oslo, the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies hosted an event to discuss the recent white paper on the High North published by the Norwegian government. Participants included experts from Norway, Brussels and the United States.

Our neighbours’ multilateral engagement is extremely serious and they are working closely together. This has happened for decades through the Nordic Council of Ministers and Nordic Council, and has recently been widened to include enhanced bilateral and multilateral relations with the Baltic Republics.

Nordic co-operation is broad and embraces areas such as environment, health, energy supply, research, culture, education, IT, research and business advancement. There is a specific Arctic Co-operation Programme which works together with countries in the Arctic Council which was formed in 1998 with the signing of the Ottowa Declaration.

An additional important consideration relates to regional security, where finely tuned defence priorities provide the capabilities which secure stability and aid the civil power across the massive area which constitutes the High North and Arctic. Our neighbours are scaling up their infrastructural capacities in the region.

Despite different relations to treaty organisations such as the European Union and Nato, the Nordic and Baltic nations are pushing ahead together as never before. This includes shared basing, training and procurement arrangements. For nations like Norway and Denmark in particular, deployability and reach within the High North and Arctic is a key consideration. This is not the case for the UK.

Recently, the UK government mapped out its future priorities in a Strategic Defence Review a weighty 75-page report which doesn’t mention the northern dimension once, underlining that it is not an important focus for Whitehall.

In addition, UK defence cuts to infrastructure and capabilities in Scotland means we will have a diminished ability to directly co-operate with our neighbours. Damaging decisions include the scrapping all fixed-wing Nimrod search and rescue aircraft. Air Force operations are ending from two out of three of the northern airbases.

There are no appropriate conventional sea-going vessels based in Scotland at all. Current UK defence plans include the withdrawal of specialised amphibious personnel from Scotland while there are no helicopters or transport aircraft. Even a cursory glance at the inventory of our neighbours shows their broader capability across all three services.

Scotland cannot afford to take this approach. With preparations under way ahead of the independence referendum it is reassuring that these regional developments are influencing the thinking of the SNP Scottish Government. First Minister Alex Salmond has visited Norway on numerous occasions to discuss common issues including the planned electricity inter-connector.

In contrast, no UK Prime Minister has made an official visit to our closest North Sea neighbour in 25 years which tells its own story about UK priorities.

Constitutional developments in Scotland and significant environmental changes offer a real opportunity and imperative to properly engage with our wider geographic region.

Our neighbours to the north and east have already made a good start and work constructively together. We need to join them and play our part. The UK has opted out of a serious approach. We should not.

For centuries, independent Scotland had close diplomatic and trading relations with our regional neighbours. The advent of political union in 1707 diverted domestic attention to the development of the British Empire to the detriment of our links with Scotland’s immediate region.

The time has come to rediscover our neighbourhood and the issues, interests, opportunities and challenges we share.

• Angus Robertson MP is the Westminster SNP Leader, Foreign Affairs and Defence spokesman.
Published on Nov 29, 2011
By Randy Boswell
Scottish MP pipes up with Arctic claim: National Post
Canada’s next Arctic rival: Scotland?!?

The retreating sea ice and rising economic profile of the circumpolar world have, in recent years, stoked occasional tensions between Canada and fellow Arctic Ocean coastal states Russia and Denmark, underlined a long-running dispute with the U.S. over control of the Northwest Passage and fuelled concerns about China’s growing interest in the region.

Now add Scotland, the United Kingdom’s northernmost realm, to the mix of Canada’s potential competitors — or partners — in the Arctic.

Angus Robertson, a prominent MP in the British Parliament and a leading member of the pro-independence Scottish National Party, has issued a call for Scotland to embrace its long-latent “Nordic” identity and to join with neighbouring Norway and nearby Iceland — as well as Canada and all other Arctic nations — to “properly engage with our wider geographic region.”

Melting ice in “Scotland’s backyard” and the expected opening of northern shipping lanes will bring “significant economic opportunities and geo-strategic challenges which must be tackled,” Robertson wrote this week in a robust appeal — published by The Scotsman newspaper — for a made-in-Edinburgh northern vision.

“For centuries, independent Scotland had close diplomatic and trading relations with our regional neighbours,” Robertson, one of the SNP’s chief strategists for a planned referendum on Scottish independence, argued. “The advent of political union in 1707 diverted domestic attention to the development of the British Empire to the detriment of our links with Scotland’s immediate region.”

Robertson’s push to position Scotland as a player in Arctic geopolitics comes at a time when Canada has resisted greater involvement in polar affairs by the European Union, which lost a bid for Arctic Council “observer” status last year, partly because of its opposition to Canada’s seal hunt.

This wasn’t the first time Robertson has urged greater awareness of Scotland’s presence on the fringes of the global North. Last year, speaking as the SNP’s defence critic, he complained that the looming prospect of new northern shipping routes was “not even on the U.K.’s radar screen,” but that Arctic sea traffic and a more northward military focus “would absolutely be a priority” for an independent Scotland.

In his latest pronouncement on the subject, Robertson argued that British neglect of the North’s potential is damaging Scotland’s future economic prospects at a time when “our neighbours’ multilateral engagement” on Arctic issues “is extremely serious and they are working closely together.”

Citing opportunities such as oil-and-gas development, mineral extraction, shipping and the emergence of new fisheries, Robertson said SNP leaders are “thinking about the challenges as we approach the independence referendum” and predicted “the massive changes impacting on the High North and Arctic will become a significant feature of the years and decades ahead” in Scottish politics.

Robertson’s plea echoes the message track in recent years from Canada’s Conservative government, which has woven a “use-it-or-lose-it” narrative around the issue of Arctic sovereignty and promoted the North as a treasure trove of resources key to the country’s economic future.

Both Robertson and Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond, who leads the pro-independence SNP majority government in Scotland’s legislature, recently have made visits to Norway.

After meetings with officials in Oslo last year, Robertson called on the British government to bolster its commitment to RAF Lossiemouth, a military base in his constituency on Scotland’s northern coast.

“If there is a genuine interest in co-operation with Nordic neighbours, it surely makes sense to maintain RAF Lossiemouth as a northerly home for the Joint Combat Aircraft — allowing easy and cost-effective transit to and from Norway and a capability commitment able to address the challenges facing the Arctic and the High North,” Robertson said at the time.

Norway is located 300 kilometres east of Scotland’s northernmost land mass, the Shetland Islands, most of which lie north of 60 degrees — closer than Oslo to the North Pole and at about the same latitude as Whitehorse and Helsinki.

Robertson’s Moray constituency in the northeast corner of Scotland is described on his website as stretching “from the cliffs, harbours and beaches of the Moray Firth to the Arctic tundra of the high Cairngorms,” a barren, snow-clad mountain chain reminiscent of Northern Canada.

Northern Scotland even can lay claim to a notable cameo scene in the most famous exploration saga in Arctic history. Lady Jane Franklin, in a bid to get as close as possible to her vanished husband Sir John Franklin — lost in the 1840s during a doomed naval expedition to polar Canada — is believed to have poignantly set foot on the famous “Out Stack” rock, Britain’s northernmost point of land lying off the Shetlands island of Unst.

And it was Canada’s most famous son of Scotland, the Glasgow-born Sir John A. Macdonald, who was prime minister in the 1880s when Canada formally acquired title over its present-day Arctic territories from the British government.
Klaus
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2168
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 12:28
Location: Cicero Avenue

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Klaus »

RajeshA wrote:
Yes I remember, but just to be certain I looked up the post again. Often things fall off one's radar! :|

But as you pointed out, it is the logical way to proceed. I think the gold rush is moving North! The Indians in England should reconsider moving to Scotland and other Nordic countries and leave England to become Englishstan!
Rajesh ji, glad you remember!

I had initially mentioned private tie ups between Indian industry and industries of the NATO allied Canada and Norway while preferring Gov to Gov links between Russia and India. My thought process at that time was related to the Khalistani movement and the Eelam movement having links to the former two, could pose an obstacle to government relations between India and these two countries (NOR and Canada), in terms of not seeing eye to eye due to ongoing tensions which are only dormant. Still havent found a way to work around this, at the same time the diaspora approach could be considered a 'soft' one. It will have to be tried, as not trying it will only leave India at status-quo or worse.

Not stepping in would mean that India leaves breathing room for the Brits to change their mind in the future, for PRC to get aggressive, for the EU to take a renewed shot at regional power projection at Canada's expense. In addition to this, Indian ports in the IOR would eventually start receiving lesser traffic, which translates to a double whammy loss due to inaction on the Arctic front.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

Spector, Ronald. In the Ruins of Empire: The Japanese Surrender and the Battle for Postwar Asia Random House, Inc.
Even paranoids have real enemies, and in this case Hurley and Wedemeyer’s suspicions were not wholly inappropriate. The British did concur in French intentions to continue their control of Indochina. Like many in Washington, British leaders wished to see a strong postwar France that would have close and cooperative relations with the former wartime Allies. Few in London could take Roosevelt’s ideas about international trusteeship and preparation for independence seriously. If they were to be taken seriously, it could easily mean that portions of the British as well as the French Empire might be seen as eligible for trusteeship. “We do not believe there is any satisfactory alternative to France as a stabilizing element,” declared the Foreign Office. “Indochina has no geographical or ethnographical unity, no political cohesion aside from that conferred by French rule. It is a mosaic of peoples, tongues and cultures.”32

Above all there was the belief that Indochina was “not ready” for independence. The Research Branch of the Foreign Office cited a book on Indochina by Virginia Thompson, a well-known American academic expert on Southeast Asia. Thompson was impressed by the “apathy, insensitivity and placidity of the Annamites…forced on them by climate and undernourishment. They lack the driving power given by strong desires. Their intelligence is keen but their character weak.”33 Of course, most other regions of Southeast Asia were equally hot and the climate was reported to have the same baleful influence. “One foreign engineer told me that among the natives of all Malaysia, including Siam, there were only half a dozen ‘adults,’” wrote bestselling travel writer John Gunther in Inside Asia. “Whether this childishness is real or not I don’t know. A reason put forward for it is the heat. Often the white man says it is the heat that ruins the natives. It sucks wit and vitality from their blood and gumption from their brains. I have heard Europeans say that true independence is impossible in a tropical country.”34 Walter Foote, longtime American consul general in Batavia and General MacArthur’s expert adviser on the Netherlands Indies, also found the Indonesians to be “docile, essentially peaceful, contented and therefore apathetic toward political moves…. The natives are definitely not ready for independence. That condition is fifty, perhaps seventy-five, years in the future.”35

In truth, in the view of the British and the view of most Americans, no one in Asia was “ready” for independence. It was true that the Indians would probably get it soon, but that was only because wartime experience had shown the British that if they failed to deliver independence, the Indians would probably take it for themselves. The Philippines were also to be independent, but still tied to the United States by various obligations and understandings. So the real question appeared to be whether other Asians would be subject to old-style colonialism or some type of new, more enlightened international stewardship that would help prepare them for self-government. Yet the theorizing of Western experts and the prudent calculations of the Foreign Office were about to be overtaken by events, and large numbers of contrary-minded “natives,” not noticeably bothered by the heat, were prepared to make the most of them.

abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

Spector, Ronald. In the Ruins of Empire: The Japanese Surrender and the Battle for Postwar Asia Random House, Inc..
Undeterred by the formation of the council and Hodge’s invitation to them to disappear, the People’s Republic and its allies continued to demand the ouster of those they labeled former pro-Japanese from high places in the civil service and police and charged that the Americans were “harboring traitors in the government general building.”13 Rumors, probably spread by the People’s Republic, that a national election would be held on March 1 began to appear in the Korean press.

General Arnold responded with a statement to the press that as duly appointed military governor, his was the only government in Korea south of the 38th parallel. “Self-appointed officials…and the self-styled government of the Republic of Korea are entirely without any authority, power or reality…. If the men who are arrogating to themselves such high-sounding titles are merely play-acting upon a puppet stage…they must immediately pull down the curtain on the puppet show. If behind the curtain of these puppet shows there are venal men pulling the strings who are so foolish as to believe that they can take to themselves and exercise any of the legitimate functions of the government of Korea, let them pinch themselves and awake to the realities of the situation.” Because freedom of the press had only recently come to Korea, “it is to be expected that many foolish and ill-considered statements will appear in the newspapers under amateur editorship…. Such boyishness even by old men will be allowed to evaporate like smoke in the air.”14

When Arnold’s statement, which all news publications were instructed to carry, was read to the assembled Korean correspondents and editors by an American public affairs officer, there was a stunned silence. “The effect was devastating,” reported one American who was present at the time. “They felt if they were required to print it, freedom of the press in Korea was but a myth.” When the unhappy journalists reassembled the next day, the editor of Maeil Sinbo, the leading Seoul paper, pointed out that only a few Korean politicians and journalists could be accused of acting irresponsibly, whereas Arnold’s rather intemperate statement appeared to indict them all. Further, such words as “amateur,” “venal,” “boyishness,” and “puppets” carried particularly unfortunate connotations in Korean. An unsympathetic American colonel told the group that Arnold had been angry and intended to use strong language. His blast was directed only at the guilty, but “if the shoe fits, wear it.”15 Maeil Sinbo refused to carry Arnold’s statement and was closed down for several days. The Korean People’s Republic replied to Arnold with a pamphlet quoting from the pro-Japanese speeches made by members of Hodge’s advisory council during the war.

...

If many Koreans soon found the American presence in Korea tiresome, many Americans found Korea to be the farthest shore of nowhere. “I thought at the time that Korea was hopeless as a society,” recalled a former American engineer officer at Inchon. “It was this curious mixture of more or less 20th century and 15th century. You could smell it forty miles at sea…. The only fertilizer they had was human excrement. Honey wagons were all over the place…. This was obviously a society totally alien to us young Americans. We had no comprehension of it.”25 The Koreans themselves “were not overly friendly.” They appeared to lack the obsequiousness and good manners of the Japanese or the jovial and accommodating approach of those Chinese long accustomed to dealing with foreigners. Instead the Koreans appeared proud, stubborn, puritanical, and contentious, “the most independent, cocky, sassiest people in the world.”26 “The GIs in Japan have got heaven and don’t know it,” declared one of Hodge’s soldiers after a short stay at a rest camp near Tokyo. “The Japanese are friendly. The Koreans are hostile. You try to take a picture of a Korean child and he runs away. You treat the Korean nice and he cheats you.” Another soldier declared he would “sign up for ten years” if he could spend them in Japan rather than Korea.27 “Here we are not dealing with wealthy U.S.-educated Koreans,” observed General Hodge, “but with poorly trained and poorly educated Orientals strongly affected by forty years of Jap control who stubbornly and fanatically hold to what they like and dislike, who are definitely influenced by direct propaganda and with whom it is almost impossible to reason.”28

Americans invariably referred to the Koreans as “gooks,” a derisive term that GIs applied indiscriminately to Filipinos, Chinese, Japanese, and other Asians. Americans who did speak a little Korean “always used the very familiar forms even to the most respectable old men. This of course was an insult.” For those soldiers who lacked any knowledge of the language, “the feeling [was] that if the Koreans didn’t understand what was being said, the corrective was to shout louder.”29


abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

from ^^
One bright spot appeared to be the venereal disease rate, which was unusually low for troops stationed in Korea. One officer speculated that this may have been “because newcomers to the area were told that Korean men would not tolerate having their females ‘mess around’ with Americans and were likely to mutilate any soldier caught in the act.”39

It seems doubtful that many GIs were cheered by the assurance of one member of MacArthur’s staff that they were “living under conditions far superior to those which existed in most combat zones during the war.”40 They were unhappy with Korea—and they tended to take it out on the Koreans. General Hodge observed that many Koreans had been alienated by GIs who “act the part of the great conquerer and run rough-shod over the rights and customs of a liberated nation. This spirit was not shown to a great degree by those splendid combat soldiers who actually won the shooting war but has grown up among replacements.” These soldiers made passes and whistled at Korean women, made fun of Korean men, and played childish pranks. Americans “literally push Koreans out of the way and lay hands on them unnecessarily.” American vehicles seldom hesitated to drive through crowds of Koreans at streetcar stops or in the market. “They take joy in and laugh at making Koreans dive for safety and in splashing them with water from vehicle wheels in rainy weather.”41 Under these circumstances it could not have been surprising when 53 percent of Koreans polled by U.S. Army intelligence in early 1946 said that they held an unfavorable impression of Americans. A poll several months later revealed that 49 percent of Koreans preferred even Japanese rule to that of the Americans.42
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

from ^^
As unrest increased, Christison made it clear to the Japanese that they would still be responsible for law and order in areas under their control, including most of the camps in the interior of Java. RAPWI teams did find the Japanese very cooperative in providing for the security of the camps. The Japanese furnished food and medical supplies transported to the camps in their own trucks and on one occasion made aircraft and pilots available to the POW teams. However, many Japanese commanders were reluctant to take any action to curb the activities of the Indonesians, fearing reprisals against Japanese citizens. They also believed that the Indonesians and not the Japanese should be responsible for the maintenance of law and order.37 The immediate issue was the repeated demands by the nationalists that the Japanese turn over arms and ammunition. The RAPWI teams strongly objected to such actions and demanded that the Japanese continue to protect the camps. Despite British protests, the Japanese Sixteenth Army advised its commander in central Java, Major General Nakamura Junji, that arms could be transferred or “loaned” to nationalist police, army, and militia forces.38 Nakamura instructed his troops accordingly.

One Japanese officer who refused to follow Nakamura’s guidelines was Major Kido Shinishiro, who commanded a battalion of some two hundred men usually referred to as the Kido Butai. Kido refused to surrender his arms, and when it appeared probable that the Indonesians might attempt to obtain them by force, he ordered his troops, along with like-minded soldiers from other units, to take control of the town of Semarang in central Java. The Japanese launched their attack early on the morning of October 15. Most writers have explained Kido’s actions as a response to requests from RAPWI to help protect the camps and as a result of his sense of military honor and obligation toward the prisoners and internees menaced by the Indonesians. However, in a 1986 interview with Indonesian scholar Han Bing Siong, Kido declared that his refusal to surrender his arms was due to the fact that Kido Butai’s rifles bore the imperial chrysanthemum emblem, indicating that they were in fact the property of the emperor. Captured Dutch arms might be transferred to the Indonesians, but under the Japanese military code, imperial arms could never be given up or lost.39

Whatever his motives, Kido’s actions infuriated pemuda elements in Semarang, who imprisoned about eighty Japanese Army workers with their families in a tiny cell without food, water, or facilities to relieve themselves. After the Japanese had spent one day in the stifling heat of the cell, ten pemuda hotheads dragged them out and shot all those still alive.40 One hundred thirty other Japanese confined at the Bulu prison were savagely butchered and mutilated. “Some corpses were hanging from the roof and from the windows, others had been pierced through and through with bamboo spears….Some had tried to write last messages in blood on the walls.”41

Japanese troops had been attempting in a rather desultory way to retake control of Semarang from the nationalists, but their mood abruptly changed after they captured the prison and viewed the scenes of horror inside. “Every Japanese soldier in Semarang went fighting mad,” reported a British RAPWI officer at Semarang. “They swept through the town regardless of danger or their own losses like one of the Mongolian hordes of Genghis Khan or Tamerlane.”42 Truckloads of Indonesian prisoners with their hands tied behind their backs were driven into the countryside and never seen again. As the Japanese soldiers captured more weapons from the pemuda they armed Japanese civilians, who joined in the killing.

Altogether at least two thousand Indonesians were killed by the vengeful Japanese. They were still at it on October 19 when a battalion of Gurkhas from the 23rd Indian Division landed at Semarang. Neither the Gurkhas nor the Japanese troops were aware of the others’ presence until some of their forces met near the center of the town. Both sides opened fire, but the Japanese quickly realized their mistake, apologized, and offered to cooperate with the Gurkhas as they were already cooperating with the RAPWI. The British would need all the help they could get, for the bloodiest phase of the revolution was just beginning.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Prem »

Asians Hunt Gas Treasure Locked in Ice Beneath Seabeds: Energy
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-1 ... nergy.html

(Geopolitical centre Moving Back to Asia. ME goes back to 8th century )
Japan and India, Asia’s biggest energy consumers after China, are closer to unlocking natural gas deposits trapped in ice below the seabed that may prove bigger than the world’s known fossil-fuel reserves.
Japan Oil, Gas & Metals National Corp. said yesterday it produced gas in the world’s first offshore test to extract the fuel from the frozen depths. A team including Oil & Natural Gas Corp. (ONGC), India’s biggest energy explorer, will drill off the east coast this year and try to produce the fuel, according to two officials at the regulator Directorate General of Hydrocarbons. They asked to not be named before the official announcement.The nations are trying to catch up with North America, where discoveries of gas in shale rock and tar sands herald an energy revolution carrying the U.S. and Canada toward energy independence. While shale is found in only certain parts of the globe, carbon frozen with water -- called methane hydrates or burnable ice -- is found under most sea beds. The catch: There’s no technology yet to commercially extract that gas.“Methane hydrates are everywhere, including in some of the fastest-growing economies,” said Will Pearson, director for global energy & natural resources at Eurasia Group in London. “If the technology is developed, it’ll alter the gas market. What is already the golden age of gas will last much longer.” estimates suggest carbon deposits in hydrates are double the size of all known oil, gas and coal reserves, the U.S. Geological Survey said in a January 2013 report. The world’s proven reserves of natural gas alone were 208.4 trillion cubic meters at the end of 2011, according to BP Plc. (BP/)
Gas molecules locked in ice have also been found in the North American permafrost and the Gulf of Mexico.
India is drilling for frozen gas it has preliminarily estimated to be as large as 1,894 trillion cubic meters, according to the website of the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons, the oil and gas exploration and production regulator. Japan’s deposits of frozen gas may be large enough to supply its needs for about 100 years, according to Japan Oil, Gas & Minerals, a government-affiliate known as JOGMEC.
“Methane hydrate could give Japan its own energy source and more independence,” said Tomoo Suzuki, professor emeritus at Tokyo Institute of Technology, who leads a study on methane hydrate deposits off the coast of Kochi prefecture. “The question is whether extracting gas from methane hydrate can be economically viable.”India, which discovered methane hydrates in the Bay of Bengal off its east coast, will later this year drill a few wells and engage in some test production to determine the size of the resource, a person familiar with the program said. Scientists have also found traces of conventional gas under the layer of hydrates on the ocean floor, the person said.. China, the world’s biggest energy consumer, is looking for technology to produce from the world’s biggest estimated shale gas deposit and enhance output from coal seams.While India imports more than 75 percent of its crude oil and a quarter of its natural gas requirements, Japan buys all its oil and gas from overseas and is seeking to find ways to cut its dependence on Middle Eastern crude oil.“Countries that highlight the opportunity are those with limited oil and gas production,” said Nathan Piper, an Edinburgh-based analyst at RBC Capital Markets. “Gas hydrates remain challenging due in part to the offshore location.”
Christopher Sidor
BRFite
Posts: 1435
Joined: 13 Jul 2010 11:02

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Christopher Sidor »

^^^
Why are we not exploring more renewable energy sources instead of searching for more hydro carbon, which is going to pollute our cities even more?
Uttam
BRFite
Posts: 577
Joined: 15 Apr 2003 11:31
Location: USA

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Uttam »

Christopher Sidor wrote:^^^
Why are we not exploring more renewable energy sources instead of searching for more hydro carbon, which is going to pollute our cities even more?

Because, all forms of renewal energy sources cost a lot more than hydro-carbon based sources.

In a Utopian world we could fix the energy need just by renewals; in the real world they cost about 2-4 times as much as traditional hydro-carbon based source. So in the real world people are more pragmatic and they invest in renewals (research as well as limited deployment till the price of renewals comes down) along with developing hydro-carbon based sources. Just a reminder, the carbon in atmosphere causes "GLOBAL" warming, i.e. a single country cannot make a dent to global warming, it has to be addressed at a GLOBAL forum.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by pankajs »

can go into a lot of threads so instead posting it here
------------------------------------------------------
BBC Breaking News ‏@BBCBreaking

"Pentagon to deploy 14 more missile interceptors on West Coast in response to North Korean threats, sources say"

Added Later:

Pentagon to beef up missile defense in response to North Korean threat, sources say
The Pentagon is beefing up the nation’s missile defense in the wake of provocative nuclear threats from North Korea and is set to deploy 14 additional ground-based interceptors at missile silos in Alaska and California, congressional and U.S. officials tell Fox News.

The extra interceptors on the West Coast, designed to counter attacks from an intercontinental ballistic missile, would bring the total number of interceptors to 44, a plan originally proposed by the Bush administration. President Obama stopped the deployment of the additional interceptors when he took office in 2009, leaving the total number at 30.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

Spector, Ronald In the Ruins of Empire: The Japanese Surrender and the Battle for Postwar Asia Random House, Inc.
Unlike the British, who were trying to placate the Indonesians, satisfy the Dutch, and keep a wary eye on American anticolonialists, Australian soldiers suffered from no confusion about their mission. Australian forces were in the Indies only to accept the surrender and to maintain law and order until “the lawful government of the Netherlands East Indies is once again functioning.”47 Units of the NICA were quickly installed as civil administrators wherever possible. The sole Australian aim was to hand over all responsibilities in the islands to the Dutch as soon as possible. “Officers commanding detached units will take all measures practicable to establish the orders of the NICA and ensure that its orders are carried out,” read one instruction from Australian headquarters.48

The Australians would as soon have handed over to Martians or anyone else likely to relieve them of their occupation duties at an early date. Aside from a handful of bureaucrats and politicians in Canberra and Melbourne, Australians had no geopolitical interest in the Netherlands Indies. Their soldiers, like other Allied soldiers from Seoul to Singapore, wanted above all to go home. “A wave of disorderliness and stealing had broken out among the men,” the 2/25 Battalion Diary noted in October. “It appears to be a phase through which the whole army is passing, due, it is thought, to the discontent felt at not being returned to Australia as soon as the fighting job was done.”49

The Australian soldiers’ understanding of Indonesia was on a par with that of American GIs’ understanding of Korea. Knowledge of Malay was almost nonexistent, although older Indonesians later recalled that the Australians “were ingenious at miming their needs, flapping their arms and cackling when they wanted a chicken.”50 A Royal Australian Air Force guide divided the indigenous peoples into three categories: the Malays, who were “an easy-going and rather lazy race” the Chinese, who were “shrewd” and very progressive but “not reliable” and the Eurasians, “a very useful community often employed as teachers, nurses, clerks and typists.”51 Most soldiers never bothered with even these distinctions but referred to all Indonesians as “the natives” or, less politely, “the boongs.” “These people are best left to the simplicity of their own lives that seem to change ever so slowly,” declared radio newscaster Frederick Simpson. “They are somewhat indolent, are these Indonesians, and in days to come their plays and dances will tell of the Jap invasion with the childlike humor of a simple people.”52
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

from ^^
IN THE LATTER PART OF 1946, TWO EVENTS OCCURRED THAT CLEARLY signaled that the American military occupations in China and Korea had come to the end of their useful life, just as had the British and Commonwealth forces’ occupations in Southeast Asia. One event began as a minor incident, the other as a massive wave of frustration and discontent.

As General Marshall was drafting his final report on his unsuccessful efforts to avert civil war in China, Corporal William Pierson and Private First Class Warren Pritchard of Headquarters and Services Company, 5th Marines, were preparing to celebrate Christmas Eve in Peiping. After a Christmas dinner at the YMCA and a visit to the ice rink near the Winter Palace, Pierson and Pritchard spent several hours drinking with fellow Marines at the Manhattan Club. At about 8:00 P.M. a group of Marines left the club for a party at the Peking Hotel, but the group split up after a minor fight among Pierson, Pritchard, and another Marine, all of whom had been drinking heavily, and the two continued alone toward the Peking Hotel. Passing the Pavilion Theater they encountered Shen Chung, a nineteen-year-old student in the preparatory course at Peking University. She had recently arrived in the city from Fukien Province and was living with her brother-in-law’s family.1

The two Marines may have mistaken Shen for a prostitute, or they may have been too drunk to care. In any case, Pierson and Pritchard took her to the nearby polo grounds, where Pierson had sex with her while Pritchard looked on. After a while, Pritchard left for the Peking Hotel. Some time after that, Kuan Te-tsung, a Chinese police officer, responding to reports of a disturbance on the polo grounds, found Pierson with Shen. Summoning more police, Kuan attempted to restrain Pierson, who later claimed that the Chinese police hit him in the face with a rifle and in the stomach with a pistol. Pierson broke away and flagged down a jeep patrol of the Joint Sino-American Police. According to the military police report, Pierson complained that the Chinese police had assaulted him and taken away “his girl.”2

The MPs took Pierson and Shen to the Joint Sino-American Police office for questioning. Early the next morning, Shen was examined by a Chinese doctor attached to the Peiping Police Department. Shen claimed that Pierson had raped her three times and that she had feared for her life while in his hands.3 Later in the day she underwent two more medical examinations, including one by a U.S. Navy doctor. The findings were inconclusive. The doctors noted that while Shen had certainly had intercourse, she did not have the cuts and bruises normally associated with a struggle. However, her failure to resist more vigorously “could have been the result of shock, fear or intimidation.”4 Following an investigation, the 1st Marine Division provost marshal recommended disciplinary action against the two Marines, and four days after the incident, the Marines announced that Pierson and Pritchard would be tried for rape by a general court-martial.

Shen and her brother-in-law attempted at first to keep the incident secret, but a press informant in the police department passed the story to the newspapers.5 The news electrified students all over China. To Chinese minds, rape was a crime more serious than murder. To make the offense even more heinous, Shen had been violated by a foreigner. There was a long tradition of student activism and protest in China, where students and teachers, though a small fraction of the population, were viewed as embodying the ideals and intellectual heritage of the nation. And Shen was not simply a student, but a student at one of China’s elite universities in the intellectual center of the country. Her family background as the daughter of a midlevel official was similar to that of many students, who could easily identify with her.

The rape came at a moment when the country appeared to be sliding back into civil war, for which most people blamed the Kuomintang. In addition, there was the weary familiarity of foreign military forces in China. They had been there for more than half a century; first the gunboats and the detachments guarding the foreign settlements and concessions, then the Japanese, and even now—when China had finally won its war for freedom—there were the Russians and the Marines. “During eight years of war China sacrificed millions of lives because she did not want to see any more atrocities committed by foreigners on Chinese soil by virtue of their military power,” declared a Shanghai newspaper. “One year and four months have now elapsed since V-J Day…. Yet a member of the Allied forces stationed in China has now violated a Chinese girl student.”6

The Shen case “set off a protest movement that never saw its equal in Kuomintang China.”7 Students at Peiping universities declared a three-day strike, and ten thousand students turned out in protest. Students in Tientsin staged a ten-hour parade, carrying placards that read “Marines Go Home,” “China Is Not a U.S. Colony,” and “Stop Your Brutal Acts.” In Nanking, thousands of students representing virtually every university in the city marched to the Foreign Office to present a petition calling for the withdrawal of all American troops from China.8 Thirty professors in Shanghai published a statement with the same demand.9 The American chargé d’affaires in Nanking, W. Walton Butterworth, observed that the rape of a student “was only the point of take-off. The underlying feeling was compounded of varying parts of economic misery, disillusionment at the war aftermath, recrudescence of the ‘unequal treaty’ psychology and simple envy…. The clearest thread of real emotion of these and other demonstrators, in fact, may be a simple hatred of the American soldier, perhaps as a symbol of their hatred of all soldiers.”10

Only a small minority of student demonstrators were Communists, but by 1947 Communist student activists had assumed leadership of many campus organizations. Their organizational skills helped to increase the impact and effectiveness of the demonstrations.11 Within a few days the protests had spread to universities throughout the country. Editorials and letters to the editor likened the violation of Shen to the longstanding violation of China by foreign nations and demanded that the Marines go home. Other writers expressed friendship for the United States but still called for the withdrawal of American troops.

Pierson’s trial opened on January 17 in Peiping with the mayor, a representative of the Foreign Ministry, and the president of Peking University all in attendance as well as seventeen members of the Chinese and foreign press. Shen was accompanied by two law professors from the university, who acted as her advisers.12 The prosecution was handled by Lieutenant Colonel Paul Fitzgerald, an able and aggressive lawyer.

Chinese newspapers closely followed the five-day trial, some even attempting to explain the rules and procedures for a court-martial.13 A representative of the Foreign Ministry told an American diplomat in Peiping that if the trial appeared fair and “if Corporal Pierson receives a sentence of ten years or more, the public in general will be contented.”14 The trial’s outcome amply met that prescription. Pierson was found guilty of rape and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Pritchard was found guilty of assault. Yet any positive effect the trial may have had on public opinion in China was nullified several months later when the secretary of the navy, on the recommendation of the Judge Advocate General, overturned the court-martial verdict and restored the two Marines to active duty.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by pankajs »

China Cites Risk of New Tension as U.S. Bolsters Missile Defenses
HONG KONG — China said Monday that the United States’ decision to strengthen antimissile defenses in response to threats from North Korea risked deepening regional tensions, underscoring Beijing’s caution on further pressuring the North despite its third nuclear test.
China’s warning was in response to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s announcement on Friday that the Pentagon would spend $1 billion to put in place more ballistic missile interceptors to counter the growing reach of North Korea’s weapons.

The 14 new interceptors will be in Alaska, where 26 of the existing 30 are already deployed, and American officials said the decision was meant to show its allies South Korea and Japan that the United States would muster the resources needed to deter the North.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60311
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by ramana »

The PRC game of war by proxies is coming home to roost.

Supplying nukes to TSP brought India overtly into the nuke game.

Now rocket technology to NoKo and nukes from TSP whihc are from PRC has brought the threat closer to PRC.

US was content with some piddly 30 odd anti-missiles but now it is upping the numbers which really threaten the puny PRC long range arsenal.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Prem »

ramana wrote:The PRC game of war by proxies is coming home to roost.Supplying nukes to TSP brought India overtly into the nuke game.Now rocket technology to NoKo and nukes from TSP whihc are from PRC has brought the threat closer to PRC.
US was content with some piddly 30 odd anti-missiles but now it is upping the numbers which really threaten the puny PRC long range arsenal.
Not over yet, real lesson will be taught when both Japan and SOKO show their Smiling Buddha in public with big applause from Asia , WEST and India. PRC shall remain under the shadow of at least 3000 Nukes 24/7 to understand that Sunn Zoo's Ants of War era got Shahadat the day they tied their leash with Pakipigs.
Vipul
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3727
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 03:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Vipul »

Under threat, South Koreans mull nuclear weapons.

The barrage of threats from North Korea has sparked talk from within South Korea of the need to develop its own nuclear weapons.

A recent poll shows that two-thirds of South Korean citizens surveyed support the idea, especially in the wake of North Korea's third nuclear test in February.

"We, the Korean people, have been duped by North Korea for the last 20 to 30 years and it is now time for South Koreans to face the reality and do something that we need to do," said Chung Mong-joon, a lawmaker in the governing Saenuri (New Frontier) Party and a former presidential conservative candiate. "The nuclear deterrence can be the only answer. We have to have nuclear capability."

The talk of South Korea arming with its own nuclear weapon used to be taboo in the country-- and there's no apparent official government move to do so. But the tensions between the two Korean nations have amplified over the weeks, becoming reminiscent of the Cold War.

Break enemies' waists Earlier this month, South Korean Defense Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok responded to North Korea's threat to attack the South with a pre-emptive nuclear strike saying: "If North Korea is to attack the South with its nuclear weapons... Kim Jong Un's regime will cease to exist on the face of Earth."

After North Korea conducted its third nuclear test last month, the South unveiled a cruise missile, which it claims to be so precise that it can target "a specific window of a North Korean military commander's office."

Some commentators in South Korean media have been calling for A nuclear weapons OPTION, claiming that the country has the technology and economy to develop them in a short period of time. And public opinion is following in line.

According to a February poll conducted by South Korea's private think tank, Asan Institute, 66% of South Koreans said they support developing a nuclear weapons program. The poll suggests that just under half of South Koreans in 2012 believed that the United States would provide South Korea with what's known as the "nuclear umbrella" in the case of a North Korean nuclear attack, indicating a 7% decrease from 2011.

Under the nuclear umbrella, the U.S. is to provide South Korea with defensive means to ensure deterrence against a nuclear threat.

In recent times, South Korea has been known for little if no reaction on North Korea's provocations and threats. Its attitude changed after the 2010 attack on its battleship That killed more than 40 sailors -- North Korea was blamed. That same year, there was also outrage after the North shelled Yeonpyeong Island. South Korea returned fire and also began responding to North Korea with its own strong words.

But not all South Koreans are rallying behind the cause of developing South Korean nuclear weapons.

If South Korea makes nuclear weapons, nonproliferation in the region would soon fall apart, Han Yong-sup, professor at the Korea National Defense University said. "Japan and Taiwan could follow the suit. Then, a domino effect of nuclear proliferation will result," he said.

To assuage anxieties in South Korea, "Washington needs to make an official statement in order to make U.S. extended deterrence more credible," Han added.

Experts say that China, also a powerful economic partner with South Korea, will never agree with the idea of nuclear armed South Korea, because "it will affect Sino-U.S. ties," said Yang Zhaohui, a professor of international relations at Peking University. (WTF can China do if South Korea really decides to go Nuclear?)

But so far, China hasn't been pleased with Kim's nuclear ambitions, although it is North Korea's closest ally and economic supporter." China recently signed on to tougher U.N. sanctions against the north, targeting that country's nuclear program.

"China appears to be getting impatient on North Korea," Yang said. "The Chinese government does not appear to be controlling its public opinion on North Korea anymore. North Korea is not popular here."

Recently, criticism of North Korea have become rampant on Sina Weibo, the popular Chinese microblog.

Kim Jong Un has even earned a nickname "Jin Sanpang" which means "Fat Kim the Third," and has become a popular subject of satire among Chinese netizens.

An editorial printed in China's state-run newspaper Global Times in January warned North Korea that if it conducted a nuclear test it would not hesitate to reduce assistance to North Korea.

"China's attitude towards North Korea appears to be changing," Yan said. "But China's priority is peace and stability in the region. It wants to maintain good relationship with both South and North Korea."
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Prem »

Japan Intercepts Nuclear Materials On Ship Bound For North Korea

http://www.fastcompany.com/3007116/fast ... orth-korea
cargo on a ship bound for North Korea and intercepted in Japan has been identified as nuclear materials today. The materials were found on the vessel, which had sailed from the Chinese port of Dalian, when it berthed in Tokyo harbor last August. After six months' testing, the Japanese authorities confirmed they were aluminum alloy rods, which are normally used in nuclear centrifuges, of which North Korea has, in the past, claimed to have "thousands."The rods, which were being stored by a firm in a warehouse in Tokyo, were ordered to be handed over by the Japanese Government, which cited a law from 2010 which allows it to intercept cargo bound for the DPRK which it suspects to be nuclear-related. Last month, North Korea undertook a third successful nuclear test, which its ally China condemned.Kim Jong Un, North Korea's rotund leader, has upped his war rhetoric over the past few months, threatening nuclear war with the U.S. and its allies, scrapping the North-South peace pact, and closing the telephone hotline connecting it to its neighbor. Over the past few weeks, Korean state TV has shown the dictator meeting with front-line soldiers and exhorting them to "cut their enemies' windpipes" in the event of hand-to-hand fighting.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Prem »

Japan Joins the Trans-Pacific Partnership -- Finally!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl ... 17496.html
( Pacificasia uniting Sans China and Taiwan)
Japanese Prime Minister Abe’s statement of his country’s willingness to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations is good for the U.S., Japan and the TPP. It follows former Japanese Primate Minister Noda’s announcement at the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) in 2011 of Japan’s interest in the TPP negotiations, which came after almost two years of discussions between the Japanese government and the other TPP parties on their expectations should Japan join the trade agreement. The TPP parties currently include the U.S., Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.Japan’s participation in the TPP will boost the agreement’s economic and strategic significance. The TPP aims to be the 21st century trade agreement that sets the rules for trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region going forward. Achieving this goal will require other major economies in the Asia-Pacific region to join the agreement with the intention of the TPP ultimately becoming a Free Trade Agreement of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), and Japan’s participation in the TPP will give added momentum towards this goal. For one, with Japan the TPP will cover 8.6 percent of global trade and almost 40 percent of global GDP. Japan’s entry into the TPP is also likely to give further impetus to other countries joining. In particular South Korea, Prime Minster Abe’s decision to commit Japan to joining the TPP should also be understood as a necessary compliment to his efforts to stimulate the Japanese economy with monetary easing and the related depreciation of the Yen. These efforts alone, without the type of economic reform the TPP will lead to, are unlikely to produce long-term improvements in Japan’s growth prospects.
( Thailand, Indonesia , Burma and India joining the group will complete the picture)
Vipul
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3727
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 03:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by Vipul »

BRICS and premature obituaries.
Global trade arrangements are experiencing far-reaching developments that could significantly impact the economic prospects of the BRICS countries. These changes could provide the trigger for their closer co-operation. A transatlantic free trade zone with the US and the European Union is already under negotiation; if successful, this would create an economic zone encompassing virtually half the world's GDP and trade flows. On the other side of the world, the trans-Pacific partnership is steadily making headway (Japan is virtually certain to join), creating another parallel and powerful trading bloc. None of the BRICS nations finds place in these emerging giant trade conglomerations. The US has championed both projects with China's relentless economic ascendance in mind, but other BRICS members will suffer heavy collateral damage as a result of their exclusion. The new groupings will set norms and standards for economic exchange with little or no input from emerging countries. They will inevitably evolve into non-tariff barriers. The serious implications of these developments should drive the BRICS nations to consider effective coping strategies. Reviving the multilateral WTO process could be one such collective response.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60311
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by ramana »

Or form their own BRICS free trade block?
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by pankajs »

cross post
-------------------------------
China "extremely concerned" about U.S.-Japan island talk
(Reuters) - Japan and the United States have started talks on military plans in case of armed conflict over a group of East China Sea Islets claimed by Tokyo and Beijing, Japanese media said on Thursday, prompting China to complain of "outside pressure."

The Pentagon confirmed talks were being held on Thursday and Friday between Shigeru Iwasaki, head of the Japanese Self-Defence Forces' joint staff, and Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. forces in the Asia-Pacific, but said they were meant to discuss "the overall security environment in the Asia-Pacific region."
"China is extremely concerned by these reports ... The Chinese government has the determination and ability to maintain the nation's territorial sovereignty," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said.

"No outside pressure will affect the resolve and determination of the Chinese government and people to maintain territorial sovereignty."

The rocky, uninhabited islets, called the Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, are located near rich fishing grounds and potentially huge oil and gas reserves.

Senior U.S. officials including State Secretary John Kerry have said in recent months that the islands are covered by the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty.
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by abhishek_sharma »

The Kenyatta Affair: What Kenya and its allies can learn from Austria’s Nazi legacy.

THE MINER’S DAUGHTER: Gina Rinehart is Australia’s richest—and most controversial—billionaire.

The Legend of Chris Kyle

The deadliest sniper in U.S. history performed near miracles on the battlefield. Then he had to come home.

The Hostage

It’s every war correspondent’s nightmare: dragged from the car by men with AK-47s; bound, gagged, and blindfolded; fearing torture or execution at any moment. Last December, a quick trip into Syria turned deadly, NBC News’s Richard Engel recalls, when his team of six was kidnapped by the vicious, pro-government shabiha militia and toyed with by a sadistic captor as they fought against their panic—and for their lives.
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5619
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by RoyG »

pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by pankajs »

A Cold War in the East China Sea?
Last week’s Cold War-styled mix of bluster and reassurance occurred amid reports that Japan’s new indigenous patrol aircraft, the P-1, will begin service with the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) this month. Having completed engineering and operational testing, two P-1s, designed by Kawasaki Heavy Industries, are to be deployed at Atsugi Air Base in Kanagawa Prefecture, southern Japan, later this month. The P-1 are part of a program launched in 2001 to replace the 80+ ageing U.S.-made P-3C “Orion” maritime patrol aircraft currently in service in the JMSDF. A total of seven P-1s are scheduled for deployment at the base by March 2014. The JMSDF has plans to acquire a total of 70 P-1s.

The turbofan engine-powered P-1 comes with an HPS-106 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, a magnetic anomaly detector (MAD) and an “artificial intelligence” electronic suite to assist the tactical coordinator (known as “TACCO”) with anti-submarine warfare operations. It can carry a variety of bombs for a total payload of approximately 20,000 lbs, as well as missiles including the AGM-84 Harpoon, ASM-1C and the AGM-65 Maverick.

Meanwhile, citing Japanese defense officials, the Yomiuri Shimbun reported on March 23 that using “the latest technologies,” Japan intends to add six new submarines to its fleet by 2021, at a cost of 50 billion yen (U.S. $528 million), as part of efforts to strengthen its defenses of the Senkakus. Japan’s submarine fleet currently consists of 16 boats. Reports also say that as many as 400 JMSDF students will receive specialized submarine warfare training at the Submarine Training Center in Hiroshima Prefecture.

Although the Senkaku dispute goes back several years, only now, through ambiguity, alliances and the gradual militarization of the conflict, is it taking a form that increasingly looks like a Cold War. Whether alliances and ambiguity lower, or increase, risks of clashes remains to be seen, but the U.S. seems to be banking on its past continuing, ensuring that the islets do not become the fuse that leads to war between the two Asian giants. Undoubtedly, talks of joint defense under existing treaties carries the risk of emboldening Tokyo and dragging the U.S. into someone else’s conflict — something that was constantly on the minds of Washington officials during the Cold War — but this may also constitute the realization that status quo politics in the East China Sea might no longer be a viable option, and that their continuation was an invitation to escalation.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Geopolitical thread

Post by pankajs »

cross-post
-----------------
Gerard wrote:North Korea rocket units on standby to attack US bases
"He finally signed the plan on technical preparations of strategic rockets of the KPA, ordering them to be standby for fire so that they may strike any time the US mainland, its military bases in the operational theatres in the Pacific, including Hawaii and Guam, and those in South Korea," KCNA said.
Post Reply