Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
Turnout after 5 phases is slightly higher than that after the same number of phases in 2014: 67.x% vs 66.x% last time. Both figures are FAR higher than any GE before 2014.Singha wrote:couptaji has started making strange rational and pro nda noises.
sure sign of a trap to keep lazy bjp voters at home
During congie times SC used to be one big cozy happy family.vijayk wrote:
Modi/Shah have left these people to their whims/fancies hoping they would behave but obviously these guys won't
he said conservatively 271 is what bjp will get amd NDA will get full majority.CRamS wrote:Guys, what do you think of Ram Madhav's comment. Was he just speaking off the cuff, or was he saying based on internal polling? But surprising he has to say it even if its true.
Listen to what PAPPU says https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1125310456778772481Smita Prakash
Verified account
@smitaprakash
Follow Follow @smitaprakash
More Smita Prakash Retweeted
After May 17th, we won't hear such speeches. Savour them now. https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1125310456778772481 …
Supratik wrote:He is dangerous. Hopefully never becomes CJI.
Is it any job of the court to direct investigations without reference to the executive?
It turned down a fervent request of Attorney General K K Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to order a court-monitored SIT probe into the matter, saying the court was not venturing into any enquiry at this moment.
"It is not an enquiry. We are meeting these officers in secret. We don't want any evidence to be disclosed," the bench said. It had asked the three officers to meet the judges in chamber at 12:30 pm.
After meeting the directors of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB), and the Delhi Police commissioner, the bench reassembled at 3 pm to hear the matter at length. .............
Earlier in the day, the apex court directed chiefs of the CBI, IB and Delhi Police to appear and meet in chambers the three judges who are hearing his claim that there was a larger conspiracy to frame the CJI.
The entire episode is "very disturbing" as it concerns the independence of the judiciary in the country, the bench said.
It turned down a fervent request of Attorney General K K Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to order a court-monitored SIT probe into the mat ..
MAY 6, 2019
As the Republic TV is on the verge of completing its 2 years, Managing Director and Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami has bought the minority shares held by Asianet Media Network and transformed Republic TV to Republic Media Network. The company has achieved a major landmark as its valuation has crossed Rs 1,200 crores in just two years, said a report commissioned by the company.
As per news reports, Republic Media Network is all set to become a completely Editor controlled organisation as Arnab Goswami agrees to buy back shares from investors like Asianet News Media. Recently, the company had also launched its Hindi news channel Republic Bharat. Asianet is said to have made strong returns on their investments made in the company.
Business Standard twisted his remarks.CRamS wrote:Guys, what do you think of Ram Madhav's comment. Was he just speaking off the cuff, or was he saying based on internal polling? But surprising he has to say it even if its true.
Like him or hate him, the guy is a media phenomenon. One man outrage factory who figured out and backed the winning horse at grave perceived cost.
Why is SP backstabbing BSP ?Akhilesh Yadav & "bahu" Dimple Yadav dont want to support Behan MayaWati ji as the PM candidate of Gathbandhan & they make it abundantly clear in interview to Prannoy Roy of rNDTV.
@narendramodi
3h3 hours ago
More
My one comment on the corruption of a former PM has riled the Congress eco-system so much but constant, below the belt remarks on a sitting PM, his family, his poverty have no effect on them!
Constant badmouthing of historical greats by one Dynasty doesn't affect them either!
The captain knows what he is doing and why.@narendramodi
3h3 hours ago
More
My open challenge to Congress.
Fight elections in the name of the former PM associated with Bofors in:
Delhi and Punjab, where innocent Sikhs were butchered in his reign.
Bhopal, where he helped Warren Anderson flee after the infamous Gas Tragedy.
Challenge accepted?
where are these ploys conceived? UB's garage?UlanBatori wrote:So that was a well-calculated ploy. Toss a pebble, get the bozos to open their door to yell abuse, then sling the gopoo happily through it. Now those are very well-aimed blows. Megaton level too.
Still the same after 2 bans in the past year eh ?eklavya wrote:^^^^
Actually, it’s desperation tactics. PM of 2014-19 wants to fight on the record of the PM of 1984-89. Why not fight on the achievements of the last 5 years e.g. demonetisation.
All the way from kenedaeklavya wrote:^^^^
Actually, it’s desperation tactics. PM of 2014-19 wants to fight on the record of the PM of 1984-89. Why not fight on the achievements of the last 5 years e.g. demonetisation.
the world respects winners, no one cares about how they won except some eczema riddled lefties and unwashed naxals.eklavya wrote:^^^^
Actually, it’s desperation tactics. PM of 2014-19 wants to fight on the record of the PM of 1984-89. Why not fight on the achievements of the last 5 years e.g. demonetisation.
One can conduct "tapas" and ignore the mosquito stinging one's cheek, but the mosquito, coming from a sh1tpile, may bring malaria so it is better to swat it. Do not waste prayer on what one can accomplish easily oneself.eklavya wrote:^^^^
Actually, it’s desperation tactics. PM of 2014-19 wants to fight on the record of the PM of 1984-89. Why not fight on the achievements of the last 5 years e.g. demonetisation.
So if voteshare transfers so 100% perfectly, why are SP, BSP and INC different parties ?eklavya wrote:^^^^
Raveen:
BJP vote share in UP in 2014 general election was 41.3%. Combined vote share of BSP and SP was 41.8%. Another 7.5% for INC.
BJP vote share in 2017 UP assembly elections was 39.7%. Combined vote share of BSP and SP was 44.2%. Another 6.2% for INC.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Ut ... y_election
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results ... l_election
Quite the tacky setup despite the spacious room, and posh wooden flooring in UP land.
Vote share in Assembly election results and General election results don’t always correlate. There is anger at state governments and MLAs. In the General it is about which party (or PM candidate who will lead the country).eklavya wrote:^^^^
Raveen:
BJP vote share in UP in 2014 general election was 41.3%. Combined vote share of BSP and SP was 41.8%. Another 7.5% for INC.
BJP vote share in 2017 UP assembly elections was 39.7%. Combined vote share of BSP and SP was 44.2%. Another 6.2% for INC.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Ut ... y_election
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results ... l_election
Karan M wrote:Than you Ranarasika,
Respect for PM Modi.
Giving them a rope long enough to hang themselves.vijayk wrote:https://scroll.in/latest/922368/cji-sex ... omplainant
Modi/Shah have left these people to their whims/fancies hoping they would behave but obviously these guys won'tThe Supreme Court on Sunday issued a clarification denying that Justices DY Chandrachud and Rohinton Nariman met Justice SA Bobde, who is one of the members of a committee investigating sexual harassment allegations against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.
The Indian Express had reported earlier in the day that Chandrachud and Nariman met the inquiry panel – comprising Justices SA Bobde, Indira Banerjee and Indu Malhotra – on May 3 to express their concerns.
...
Perhaps, but people are voting for Modi and not Yogi. However this time it is a matter of pressing the party button which will lead the country, and if voting percentages increase, it will most likely be to the BJP’s benefit.eklavya wrote:Vote shares will not transfer perfectly. What I was trying to show was that between 2014 and 2017, the BJP lost popularity in UP. Some of that might have to do with demonetisation. If Yogi Adityanath has governed well, perhaps the BJP vote share in 2019 might go up. Personally, I think his language (which has earned him campaign bans from the ECI) will lose the BJP more votes than it will gain.
Sure, just like they raised a complaint against their own MP CM Kamal Nath for breaking MCC by having "Kamal" in his name.RajD wrote:Breaking news:
Guys, Congress has just launched a complaint against Namo for his comments on Rajiv Gandhi. Abhishek Manu Singhvi just briefed reporters outside EC office.
You are aware that the party that "lost popularity" won that AE by the second biggest landslide the state has ever seen (after the 1952 assembly elections) ? And that SP and BSP have large numbers of people who can't stand one another - which is the whole reason why they exist as separate parties ? Also, that state level elections elect the CM and GEs are a mandate for a PM ? This is effectively a presidential election - Modi vs whoever else.eklavya wrote:Vote shares will not transfer perfectly. What I was trying to show was that between 2014 and 2017, the BJP lost popularity in UP. Some of that might have to do with demonetisation. If Yogi Adityanath has governed well, perhaps the BJP vote share in 2019 might go up. Personally, I think his language (which has earned him campaign bans from the ECI) will lose the BJP more votes than it will gain.