Page 90 of 99
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 01:08
by pankajs
^
CRamS saar that to me indicates that at least some the so called liberals are now realizing that their fathers, brothers, husbands, sons and all future male issues have been branded as rapist. That apart the male liberals have themselves been branded as rapist. Wonder is that it took them so long!!
I haven't read the post. Just going by your comments.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 01:10
by CRamS
pankajsJi, you should read that blog. Then you will relaize the self righteous ire directed against me by AmberJi is uncalled for given the motive of this Brit, and how she dishonored Nirbhaya.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 01:11
by Sagar G
pankajs wrote:^
CRamS saar that to me indicates that at least some the so called liberals are now realizing that their fathers, brothers, husbands, sons and all future male issues have been branded as rapist. Apart from the these the male liberals have themselves been branded as rapist.
I haven't read the post. Just going by your comments.
Mehh it merely mean that the libtard didn't get her/his cut and hence now falling back to their Indian identity (unfortunately).
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 01:28
by ramana
CRS, Do yourself a favor and calm down and learn to rebut civilly. A primer was posted in the Nukkad thread and is linked below.
Even Shoba De has not refuted the central point of Udwin undocumentary.
http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewto ... 2#p1798042
Calling her names will invite wrath at people who take offense at your words and give the original offenders a pass.
BTW just remarking, MUTU meme runs deep and wide in the Forum. Even the umbrage at MMS being called names (looks like well deserved based on a litany of books (Baru et al) and news reports and court summons) is not really in support of MMS and his coterie but for US.
SagarG, Tuvaluan you also can benefit from the above.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 02:20
by panduranghari
Amber G. wrote:
He articulated it pretty well how India and US are good friends..
Come rain, come shine. But India and USA can never be truly friends. As Rajiv Malhotra puts it- we will tolerate each other but there will never be mutual respect.
But as some say- never say never ever.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 02:23
by CRamS
ramanaGaru, point taken.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 02:30
by ramana
I think a film to document the heinous and grievous abuses that women face all over the world is a laudable object. One of our members created two twitter links that document Violence against women(@violenceonwomen) news reports and human trafficking news reports (@HumanTrafficIND) and collate news reports in English news media in India to bring about awareness. The two links have google maps which also map the news reports.
However the BBC documentary by focusing on India without providing world wide context, especially now its clear such contextual information has been edited out is a hit job. And is in along line of Anglo-Saxon Conrardian angst.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 07:10
by Tuvaluan
This scam about "Religious freedom" is being tried by the christian nations on all asian countries and this is being pushed by the worthless UN "human rights" council. The UN needs to be razed down to the ground and set on fire for the betterment of humanity.
http://vietnamnews.vn/politics-laws/267 ... oving.html
Heiner Beilefeldt, UNHRC's Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion and beliefs, said Viet Nam had made progress in observing freedoms, including the expansion of religious dignitaries, followers and worship facilities, in recent years. Beilefeldt studied the current conditions in Viet Nam and wrote a report on the country's achievements and ongoing issues.
Viet Nam should continue refining legal regulations on religions and beliefs while clarifying allegations related to those freedoms, he said. He also expressed his willingness to continue working in Viet Nam as a special rapporteur.
Notice the lack of mention of exactly which religion is not being allowed any "Freedom" to spread.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 07:56
by Kashi
Amber G. wrote:but Obama did not insult India.In fact, every small indication I get in terms of real values (eg details of scientific collaboration etc) I am amazed at the rate the relationship is becoming better.
So as per you Obama's speech at Siri Fort and then again at the prayer meeting "did not insult India", then how do you classify those statements?
If the relationship is indeed getting better as you said, then why was this need to indulge in verbal skulduggery?
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:28
by disha
ramana wrote:
BTW just remarking, MUTU meme runs deep and wide in the Forum. Even the umbrage at MMS being called names (looks like well deserved based on a litany of books (Baru et al) and news reports and court summons) is not really in support of MMS and his coterie but for US.
Many thanks for stating it. To me it is a solace to hear it!
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:31
by Shreeman
Coming from the premise that the US is India's oldest and everlasting friend who will give up on Israel before it even thinks ill of India, I cant imagine how you get the idea that the president would do anything to undermine his standing. While being in India, or outside.
These statements, like the F16s are totally taken out of context. A presidents job is to say things they dont mean. If they mean X, they have to say Y.
Also, each statement comes with an expenditure of political capital. Sometimes you recoup this capital by sending F16s to pakistan, other times Oliver Hazard Perrys. Small-time statements can be compensated with a few hundred AMRAAMs.
But for biggest capital gains, you have to use the R word. Its like a super veto. It comes in two varieties. The R-F (freedom) variety is a simple admonishment, where as the R-P (persecution) comes with NGO funding, immigration visas, and network TV coverage of exploitation allegations, lawsuits in tow. Every president needs these tools to succeed in his foreign policy agenda. In this iteration, only the F version has been used.
India should be grateful, honored, to have been honored with so much effort from the president. I mean, if they were proper and british, they would have waived religious visa fees, provide free transportation and converted a few million. I mean they have a billion souls to be saved. They could have supported the presidents agenda without even noticing anything.
But you see India is intransigent. This is a good example of India being difficult to business with. China on the other hand, routinely offers 10,000s free workers for every trade delegation. India will never catch up.
As you see, this is already being counter-productive. The PM doesnt have any takers in the EU/Brussels. And Paris is offering a final warning to hand over $30B and sign on the dotted line if future access to cheese is desired.
You have to conform to the world model of economics, politics, civics. Otherwise, you will never be a free country, your people will experience the change via a color revolution or a jhaadu party sooner or later.
Beware, the ides of march.
(Totally ok. One of my better rants in a while. For an on-the-go piece, without editing, a very mad output)
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:37
by ramana
Truly one of your better rants!!!
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:47
by Kashi
Shreeman wrote:(Totally ok. One of my better rants in a while. For an on-the-go piece, without editing, a very mad output)
This one is for archives Shreeman ji. Brilliantly put.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:50
by Yagnasri
We have till date created no narative about the genocides of the Goras in any manner what so ever. In fact we actively avoid taking even small steps - like getting out of the so called British Commonwealth. So what do we expect other than insults at every point.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 08:57
by Tuvaluan
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinio ... -hit-list/
how exactly does this guy feel threatened if, according to his own experiences, he is being treated as a celebrity. Seriously confounding.
But the outburst of Mohan Bhagwat against Mother Teresa, an acknowledged saint — acknowledged by all communities and peoples — has put me back on the hit list.
So basically disliking Mother Theresa is equivalent to disliking all christians is it? So why is this any different from hindus claiming that disliking swamy X is equivalent to being a hindu hater? (Not that I agree with either group) WTF is wrong with Mr. Riberio? What is this "hit list" he thinks he is on -- if he continues to play victim, he will get what he deserves, especially when he is actually respected widely going by his own claims.
What is all this victimhood drama being played out by Indian christians and then being amplified by the mischiefmongers in the US and UK? The church attacks are certainly not supported by any political entities, but these guys are out to blame the majority community for every little crime that happens in their religious places....after a point, why would the majority really give a damn if they are being blamed for things that they had nothing to do with.
It warmed the cockles of my heart that ordinary Hindus, not known to me, still thought well of me and would like to be friends 25 years after my retirement, when I could not directly serve them.
Why does he think these ordinary hindus are not the same people who dislike the likes of Mother Theresa? Assumptions assumptions....Chris Hitchens and other non Indians have also exposed Mother Theresa for what she is, but does that make then christian haters? seriously.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 09:12
by Arjun
Julio Robeiro wrote:Christians have consistently punched above their weight — not as much as the tiny Parsi community, but just as noticeably
Not true....Christians don't rank very high in the communities that punch above their weight in India.
Even when looking at 'minority' religions - Jains, Sikhs and Parsis far surpass Christians on any metric. If we are to look at caste rather than religions as the basis of community - then there are many, many more communities that would far surpass the Christians on standard attainment metrics.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 09:35
by Prem
Basically, with Taadka Myya and her Kicthen Kittens controlling MMS/PMO office , these Paadres-i & RNI Congress-i,their local goons plus foreigner Aaflatoons in religious Janoon thought they had Kabja on India. Very early on ,They tried best to politically and physically eliminate Modi from the national scene . But Vidhi has Her own Vidhan to impart Gyan to these Aanjaan Morrakh Missionaries and assorted MC with them. Modi is reality while these Deshdrohis are drying, fading fast from the scene like the dog pee in hot Indian summer Sun.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 21:35
by Sagar G
Another hate crime
Indian origin woman in US was shot in head
Albany: An Indian-origin woman found dead at her apartment in the US last week was apparently shot in the head, the media reported.
The 37-year-old Randhir Kaur - a dental student at the University of California in San Francisco - was shot once in the head at her apartment on March 8, police said, according to a CBS San Francisco report on Sunday.
She was reported to have attended prayers at a gurdwara earlier in the day.
When Kaur did not show up the following day, her colleagues became concerned and notified a family member who went to her apartment and found her body, police said.
Detectives found no sign of forced entry into her apartment or foul play. Kaur`s car was found parked and locked at her residence.
On March 9, police found personal items belonging to Kaur inside a trash receptacle, roughly two miles away from her apartment.
Criminalists from the Alameda county sheriff`s crime laboratory have been called to assist in the investigation, which police said was a standard practice for any homicide in the city.
Two additional investigators have been assigned to the case, bringing the total number of full-time investigators to six, along with several part-time personnel, police said.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 16 Mar 2015 22:21
by ramana
Arjun wrote:Julio Robeiro wrote:Christians have consistently punched above their weight — not as much as the tiny Parsi community, but just as noticeably
Not true....Christians don't rank very high in the communities that punch above their weight in India.
Even when looking at 'minority' religions - Jains, Sikhs and Parsis far surpass Christians on any metric. If we are to look at caste rather than religions as the basis of community - then there are many, many more communities that would far surpass the Christians on standard attainment metrics.
In one sense partly true. The Anglo-Indians have a nominated member of the Rajya Sabha. The Railways, the Indian Air Force and Indian Navy early on had quite a contingent from that community.
Now its more eclectic.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 08:09
by Arjun
ramana wrote:In one sense partly true. The Anglo-Indians have a nominated member of the Rajya Sabha. The Railways, the Indian Air Force and Indian Navy early on had quite a contingent from that community.
True...Anglo Indians have made a mark in teaching, Armed Forces & sports.
Two castes within Indian Christians - the Syrian Christians of Kerala, & the Mangalore / Goan Catholics of Konkan coast also score very well in various attainment stats. Both of these castes are not shy of proudly proclaiming their Brahmin roots though and genetics clearly has had a role to play in their success. At the same time - there is a lot of emigration from these castes in particular while the growth of Christian population through evangelism is primarily from the BC / SC / ST community in India. Overall Christian attainment stats therefore remain low.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 09:58
by Prem
Sagar G wrote:Another hate crime
[On March 9, police found personal items belonging to Kaur inside a trash receptacle, roughly two miles away from her apartment.Criminalists from the Alameda county sheriff`s crime laboratory have been called to assist in the investigation, which police said was a standard practice for any homicide in the city.Two additional investigators have been assigned to the case, bringing the total number of full-time investigators to six, along with several part-time personnel, police said.
[/quote]
Sushma Sawaraj took note of this and has been in contact with both her parents in India and CGI in SFO to extend all the help they need.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:07
by TSJones
Arjun wrote:ramana wrote:In one sense partly true. The Anglo-Indians have a nominated member of the Rajya Sabha. The Railways, the Indian Air Force and Indian Navy early on had quite a contingent from that community.
True...Anglo Indians have made a mark in teaching, Armed Forces & sports.
Two castes within Indian Christians - the Syrian Christians of Kerala, & the Mangalore / Goan Catholics of Konkan coast also score very well in various attainment stats. Both of these castes are not shy of proudly proclaiming their Brahmin roots though and genetics clearly has had a role to play in their success. At the same time - there is a lot of emigration from these castes in particular while the growth of Christian population through evangelism is primarily from the BC / SC / ST community in India. Overall Christian attainment stats therefore remain low.
Well, yeah sure, you gotta figure it's genetics especially for the lower castes. Then, your average Brahmin is smarter than any Anglo American on any day of the week and twice on Sunday. For sure. You guys are dyn-o-mite.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:23
by svenkat
Arjun saar,
That reference to 'genetic' was unwarranted.
It is a fact that some christians of west coast do identify themselves as descendants of brahmanas.
It will certainly be the same as the country’s defence minister’s as our ancestors arrived in Goa with the sage Parshuram at the same time. Perhaps we share a common ancestor somewhere down the line. It is an accident of history that my forefathers converted and his did not. I do not and never shall know the circumstances that made it so.
JF Ribeiro conveniently forgets that christians enjoy huge properties and privileges(running educational institutions) which are an imperialist legacy.Why should Yeshu worshippers continue to have these imperialist relics of privilege?Do christists have some genetic/racial superiority they should have unhindered privilege of peddling influence?Does US allow hindus to control the historical narrative or to form a baneful influence on their children/students?
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:37
by chetak
svenkat wrote:Arjun saar,
That reference to 'genetic' was unwarranted.
It is a fact that some christians of west coast do identify themselves as descendants of brahmanas.
It will certainly be the same as the country’s defence minister’s as our ancestors arrived in Goa with the sage Parshuram at the same time. Perhaps we share a common ancestor somewhere down the line. It is an accident of history that my forefathers converted and his did not. I do not and never shall know the circumstances that made it so.
JF Ribeiro conveniently forgets that christians enjoy huge properties and privileges(running educational institutions) which are an imperialist legacy.Why should Yeshu worshippers continue to have these imperialist relics of privilege?Do christists have some genetic/racial superiority they should have unhindered privilege of peddling influence?Does US allow hindus to control the historical narrative or to form a baneful influence on their children/students?
julio riberio, maxwell pereira are all the same. Once they have exhausted all the fruits of the "secular" tree and no more is forthcoming, their true natures and ingrained prejudices are displayed for all to see.
Such views are not suddenly developed overnight but are deeply ingrained in their personalities and very carefully hidden from view.
In the end, the true colors will always out.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:39
by Arjun
svenkat wrote:That reference to 'genetic' was unwarranted.
My reference seems to have been misunderstood.
My point was only this - there are a couple of 'castes' within the Indian Christian community that are doing fairly well in terms of standard attainment metrics. Is the performance of these castes due to any "Christian" emphasis on education / missionaries/ schools or is this performance purely a result of a one-time historical anomaly that is unlikely to be replicated - of large-scale conversions from an existing upper caste ?
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:49
by JE Menon
>>Is the performance of these castes due to any "Christian" emphasis on education / missionaries/ schools or is this performance purely a result of a one-time historical anomaly that is unlikely to be replicated - of large-scale conversions from an existing upper caste ?
I think it would be fairly easy to establish this, perhaps as simple as assessing whether these upper castes they have converted from have been much lower in these achievement metrics. I presume these upper castes are brahmins, etc... Should be controlled for relative population sizes of course
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:51
by KLNMurthy
ramana wrote:I think a film to document the heinous and grievous abuses that women face all over the world is a laudable object. One of our members created two twitter links that document Violence against women(@violenceonwomen) news reports and human trafficking news reports (@HumanTrafficIND) and collate news reports in English news media in India to bring about awareness. The two links have google maps which also map the news reports.
However the BBC documentary by focusing on India without providing world wide context, especially now its clear such contextual information has been edited out is a hit job. And is in along line of Anglo-Saxon Conrardian angst.
I haven't seen the documentary (have been reluctant to subject myself to it) but still, based on what I read, it seems to me that there are some parallels with the way Tehelka magazine got some people to say awful things about their own participation in the Gujarat 2002 riots, and used those statements as "proof" that Modi ordered the riots.
Here we have an obvious sociopath and a convicted murderer and rapist, who I understand was paid for his time (at least his family was, I believe) against all norms of ethics and decency (and against US and possibly UK law which the filmkaker would have been well aware of, India not having such a law prohibiting criminals from being paid for their stories is not an excuse for not doing the decent thing), spouting what might be called the "predator's rules" and then his words are used to smear India and especially Indian men by association.
It is a very neat propaganda ploy as it is very hard to come out against such tactics without it being made to seem like you are in favor of massacring Muslims or rape-murder of Indian girls, as the case may be. Those who are short on intellectual and emotional maturity and self-discipline and respond with loose and rash language against the perpetrators are surely a great resource, albeit unwitting, for the propagandists.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 10:53
by pankajs
Lot of stuff above that does not belong to India-US thread.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/us/ev ... -2016.html
Evangelicals Aim to Mobilize an Army for Republicans in 2016
DES MOINES — One afternoon last week, David Lane watched from the sidelines as a roomful of Iowa evangelical pastors applauded a defense of religious liberty by Senator Ted Cruz of Texas. That night, he gazed out from the stage as the pastors surrounded Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana in a prayer circle.
For Mr. Lane, a onetime Bible salesman and self-described former “wild man,” connecting the pastors with two likely presidential candidates was more than a good day’s work. It was part of what he sees as his mission, which is to make evangelical Christians a decisive power in the Republican Party.
“An army,” he said. “That’s the goal.”
And Mr. Lane is positioning himself as a field marshal. A fast-talking and born-again veteran of conservative politics with experience in Washington, Texas and California, Mr. Lane, 60, travels the country trying to persuade evangelical clergy members to become politically active.
His hope is that the politicized pastors will help mobilize congregations that have been disheartened by the repeated failure of socially conservative candidates, and by a party that has softened its opposition to same-sex marriage.
It is an organizing approach far different from those in the days when larger-than-life leaders like the Moral Majority founder, Jerry Falwell, who died in 2007, or Pat Robertson, now 84, could activate evangelical voters simply by anointing a candidate.
But close observers of evangelicals and their political involvement say Mr. Lane is emblematic of a new generation of evangelical leaders who draw local support or exert influence through niche issues or their own networks.
Unlike political operatives such as Ralph Reed, the former executive director of the Christian Coalition who helped elect George W. Bush before becoming ensnared in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal, Mr. Lane does not have an extensive organization.
What Mr. Lane, a former public relations man, does have going for him is a decentralized landscape in which a determined believer with an extensive network of ground-level evangelical leaders and a limitless capacity for talking on the phone can exert influence on Republican presidential candidates eager to reach evangelical voters.
“David is the real deal,” said the Rev. Brad Atkins, a prominent pastor in South Carolina. “He really believes that this is his calling.”
And it is here in Iowa, where conservatives traditionally have an inordinate influence in the state’s Republican presidential caucuses, that evangelicals have their best shot of shaping the field. In what he says is his effort to restore “our Christian heritage,” Mr. Lane’s American Renewal Project has already shown its influence in Iowa by helping to unseat three State Supreme Court justices who voted to allow same-sex marriage.
But Mr. Lane’s ambitions are national — he focused on battleground states in 2014 and has built an email list of 100,000 pastors around the country.
His goal now is to get 1,000 pastors to run for public office, and their potential support has drawn a virtual pilgrimage of conservative candidates eager to join the tours Mr. Lane organizes to Israel and to his “Pastors and Pews” events.
“A good friend” Mr. Cruz said.
“A great friend,” Mr. Jindal said.
With some of the energy gone from the evangelical movement, said John C. Green, a political scientist at the University of Akron and an expert on evangelicals, “this is about keeping the pressure on for the next election.”
“Lane has influence with pastors, and they listen to him,” Mr. Green added.
All this activity has caught the attention of liberal opponents, who call Mr. Lane an extremist for his belief that abortion will incur divine vengeance on America and his argument that the Republican Party will be destroyed by its acceptance of same-sex marriage just as the Whig Party was destroyed by its acceptance of slavery in the 19th century.
They have sought to cast him as the de facto travel agent for the American Family Association, a Mississippi-based conservative religious organization, which had to distance itself from a spokesman, Bryan Fischer, who called homosexuals “Nazis” and argued that Muslims should not enjoy First Amendment rights and should be converted to Christianity.
Mr. Lane said that he raises his own money for his trips and events from a handful of wealthy donors, whose names he declined to divulge, and that the American Family Association pays him a retainer and provides him with legal and accounting assistance. In return the group, which has an expansive radio network, Internet constituency and budget, gets its name on all of Mr. Lane’s events and adds to its database the contact information of all the pastors he organizes.
Questions about his associations or accusations that he is an opportunist clearly get under Mr. Lane’s skin. But, he said, they show how he is “on the radar.”
And it is a long way from where he started. Raised in rural Oklahoma by his grandparents after his parents divorced in his infancy and his father left, Mr. Lane hit bottom as a partying student at the University of Mississippi, where for four summers he sold Bibles door to door.
“I’d stay drunk all night and sell Bibles all day,” he said. With about a semester to go in 1977, he dropped out, instead pursuing a life of “drugs, wine, women and song.” (“Le Freak” by Chic and “cocaine,” he clarified.)
He eventually sought redemption from the Bible and a series of motivational speaking mentors. Judge Ziglar, author of “Timid Salesmen Have Skinny Kids” and brother of the famed motivational speaker Zig Ziglar, took an interest in him.
Then, after having a conversion moment in a downtown Atlanta alley following a motivational seminar, he moved to Houston and came under the wing of Judge Paul Pressler, a key figure in the resurgence of the Baptist conservative movement and the Moral Majority.
Bob Perry, the wealthy Texas home builder and Republican donor, who later funded the Swift Boat Veterans campaign against John Kerry in 2004, gave Mr. Lane $3,000 of seed money to get started in Washington, where Mr. Lane began working for Carl Channell in support of President Ronald Reagan’s “Star Wars” defense system.
“Spitz taught me the fund-raising business,” said Mr. Lane, using a nickname for Mr. Channell. “He was a homosexual.”
He eventually worked for Mr. Falwell, and throughout his career gained a reputation as a “pastor’s friend,” said his own former pastor, the Rev. Gary Miller, who tearfully recalled Mr. Lane’s handing him a pair of new shoes during a period of tight finances in his own life.
And it is as a pastoral impresario that Mr. Lane has found his influence and attracted an audience of auditioning politicians. He organized an event with Gov. Rick Perry and hundreds of evangelical pastors in Texas in 2005. Dozens of events and candidates and seven years later, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky attended an event in South Carolina.
“They say you’re anti-Israel,” Mr. Lane said he told Mr. Paul when they met, and asked if he had ever been to Israel. When Mr. Paul said he had not, Mr. Lane, whose daughter now works for Mr. Paul, asked if the senator would be interested in going on a tour with evangelical leaders from Iowa and South Carolina.
Two years ago, Mr. Paul, his wife, Kelley, and their sons joined about 50 pastors and evangelical leaders on the trip. Afterward, Mr. Lane said, he received a note from Mr. Paul in which he wrote that he had awaked from a dream singing “How Great Thou Art” and that two of his sons had committed their lives to Christ.
After Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey made a good impression at a Republican event later that year, Mr. Lane offered him the chance to join primary state pastors on a “Reagan, Thatcher, John Paul II” tour to California, London and Rome.
“They turned it down,” said Mr. Lane, who smiled when asked if he thought that was a mistake.
Instead, Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, jumped at the opportunity, subbing former Nazi concentration camps and Oskar Schindler’s former factory in Poland for the stop in Rome.
Last month, Mr. Lane took 60 members of the Republican National Committee to Jerusalem at a cost, he said, of about $500,000. A trip to Israel with Mr. Jindal is planned for July.
Missing from his travel manifests and events are the Republican Party’s establishment candidates. While Mr. Lane is technically neutral at this point, he clearly is no fan of the more moderate wing of his party. He said he tried to rescue the 2008 and 2012 tickets by advocating Mr. Huckabee for vice president.
While he admires Jeb Bush’s record as governor of Florida, especially his opposition to taking Terri Schiavo off life support, he scoffed at Mr. Bush’s choice for evangelical liaison, noting that he was “26 years old” and that his father was “behind Romney.” And as far as Mr. Bush’s hiring an openly gay communications director, he said: “I don’t understand what he’s up to. Personnel is policy.”
Mr. Lane is himself something of a one-man operation. He said that he shares the same hard-charging engine as his father, a car dealer who made the Chevrolet Hall of Fame, and since setting up shop in Southern California in 1998, Mr. Lane has acted mostly behind the scenes. Last week’s conference, and the two presidential hopefuls, was a calculated step into the spotlight.
“If the Lord were to call 1,000 pastors in America — 1,000 — and they ended up with an average of 300 volunteers per campaign in 2016, that would be 300,000 grass-root, precinct-level, evangelical conservatives coming from the bottom up,” he said to the ballroom full of pastors. “It would change America.”
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 11:27
by Arjun
JE Menon wrote:I think it would be fairly easy to establish this, perhaps as simple as assessing whether these upper castes they have converted from have been much lower in these achievement metrics. I presume these upper castes are brahmins, etc... Should be controlled for relative population sizes of course
Last post on this thread on this topic from me, since we are going OT.
But the point you raise is something I have personally been studying for a while.
I think the best population to compare this in would be Goan/ Mangalore Catholics vs GSB / Konkani Brahmin community. Most of the Goan Catholics count themselves as 'Bammon' (ie converted Konkani Brahmins). GSBs are famous for their business achievements (Mallya, Pai, Nilekani etc) and also do very well in education. Goan Catholics don't seem to do as well in STEM-type areas but there are quite a few high achievers in the corporate world (Glenn Saldana, Victor Menezes, Ivan Menezes, Tony Fernandes etc). We don't have precise figures for the Konkani Brahmin population (2011 census may include caste census for the first time) - so difficult to normalize by populations. But overall - the two communities are at best same or GSB community may have an advantage over the Catholics.
Syrian Christians in Kerala claim Brahmin / Nair conversions - but at the same time Kerala was unique in having huge presence historically of traders from the Middle East, including Nestorian Christians and Jews. Maybe a DNA analysis will reveal more - but unlike in the Goan case, there is no clear-cut Indian caste that can be tied to their origins.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 12:51
by Hari Seldon
US gave 700 Indians political asylum in 2014 (India Today)
"One thing is very clear that the number of asylees of Indian origin are increasing every year, which is a matter of concern," said Satnam Singh Chahal, NAPA executive director.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 13:38
by Yagnasri
Sangita Richards and her family many be on of the above last year or may be part of the "justice department" quota for which interestingly no details were mentioned in the report.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 17:16
by Tuvaluan
And we have people here claiming US does not behave like an enemy state when it comes to India. If it is not about pretending that Punjab is under political siege, what is the reason for the US providing asylum unless these punjabis are lying in their application form as to why they need political asylum? So give people green cards and "asylum" and pretend that they are persecuted in India, without even bothering to check if that is really the case. This kind of pressure will only increase if the US is allowed to get more influence in India.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 18:36
by Philip
The new For.Sec,Jaisankar said in a media that Indo-US relations are still stuck in a "Cold War" mentality.One musn't expect too much or too little too soon.
This is what we've been saying on BR for aeons! The problem dogging Indo-US relations is the "pig in the room",Pak. Pak continues its terrorist perfidy against India with relentless zeal.In 26/11 US citizens were massacred by the Paki terrorists,yet the US has done b*gger all about it,except mouthing threats and rewarding Pak with more billions with which to wage war against India.No drone strikes against those who were behind 26/11,because they are the ISI's children and the ISI is the CIA and State Dept.'s rent-boy. So Indo-US relations will forever remain stunted as long as Pak exists in its present form.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 18:41
by Tuvaluan
Pak does not have anything to do with this -- the refrain of "unsafe minorities" etc. is being aided by all the sepoys on the ground, most of whom are congress supporters. There is no increase in religious riots and violence on the ground, from the previous one to the current one, but the volume only grows louder and it is being aided by these very minorities who have pretended to live in harmony with the majority so far. All it takes is for a majority friendly government for these guys to start providing fodder to foreign governments without good cause (which is the worst part -- these church-related crimes seem to be vandalism where the culprits are not known where the ruling party are being slandered as being the culprits, even before the facts are out).
Disappointing to see Shiv Shankar Menon adding to this noise, seriously. And this guy was the country's NSA recently. A recent case of church vandalism was an altercation between two parties constructing structure on land they did not own, and one of the parties was a church and its priest, and the entire this is being played out as violence against christians by the majority. This is all highly motivated and the christian minority is not playing straight here, and that does not bode well for any group.
This can only cause further bitterness between religious groups, but maybe that is the intent of these churches and priests who are crying hoarse about violence against them for no good reason -- taking a leaf from the islamist playbook. The least these churches can do, if they want to be seen as responsible organizations, is wait for the police to complete their investigations to complete before creating an international racket.
Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar had earlier told reporters here that action will be taken against those who had allegedly vandalised the church.
Khattar had said that an FIR has been registered on the statement of church priest Subhash Chander, against several persons including Anil Godara, Dalbir Singh, Raj Kumar, Kuldeep, Satpal, Krishan, Suresh, Dinesh, Jogender, Kulwant, Sudhir, Bijender, Satnarain and Chhotu Ram.
Khattar had told the Assembly yesterday that the building was reportedly built in an illegal colony and the vandalisation was the result of an altercation between the priest and those who attacked the place of worship.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi today expressed his concern over the incident and asked for an immediate report on facts and action taken.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 20:04
by RamaY
This is a good news. Hopefully this will help all those who are "Ashamed of being Indian" or "feel persecuted for being blah blah" can find a suitable place to live happily.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 20:36
by Tuvaluan
They will also be useful to restart Khalistan in due course, given the rampant number of supporters in Canada and the US, many more in Canada.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 20:38
by Amber G.
Kashi wrote:Amber G. wrote:but Obama did not insult India.In fact, every small indication I get in terms of real values (eg details of scientific collaboration etc) I am amazed at the rate the relationship is becoming better.
So as per you Obama's speech at Siri Fort and then again at the prayer meeting "did not insult India", then how do you classify those statements?
If the relationship is indeed getting better as you said, then why was this need to indulge in verbal skulduggery?
Kashiji - Since you asked, let me respond.
Short answer is - No, Obama's speech at Siri Fort did not insult India. In fact having watched that speech, I think it is silly to think that there was any Insult. I will expand on that a little but first let me clear one point.
The relationship is not a binary bit, and people may have different views. I respect that. The proof will be in what happens a few years from now.. that's what matters. Like Modi, I personally am very optimistic. . It was not that long ago (post 98), when I tried to invite fellow scientists (even prominent ones, and even those whose interest was nowhere close to nuclear physics etc) who were refused visa due to "security clearance". Even Modi was denied Visa. The situation is changed dramatically. Modi was welcomed in US like a rock star. Post 26/11 cooperation between US and India's in technical matters, most of which is public knowledge now has been very good. ("very good" part I have seen articulated many times while working with analyzing forensic GPS data or communication network by US-India team)
But time will tell how far this good relationship will go.
Getting back to Obama's speech -
There was a small but powerful lobby which blocked NaMo's entry in US. Many of them were still abuzz telling us how even after NaMo's trip to US, NaMo was only a person "who represents
some of the people of India.. They wrote only negative parts (mostly manufactured) about NaMo.
The situation is very similar.. they have their "counter part" which will project negativity only.
Listen to speech -- See audiance's reaction.... no one was feeling insulted .. no one was booing ..NaMo did not complain (in fact he still considers Obama's trip a huge success)..etc..
If Obama's speech was that insulting as some like to say, why didn't GOI lodged any unhappiness?
Just obvious things, I suppose.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 21:08
by Tuvaluan
Modi will not be given a visa if he were to apply as a civilian, so about relations with the US being all peachy is sheer disinformation. Diplomacy is not about lodging complaints but getting things down outside of any existing disagreements -- this is elementary stuff to anyone pretending to claim knowledge of how governments work. Rhetorical questions worthy of high school students are pretty laughable.
Modi can and will be denied a visa to the US if he were not the PM, and the GoI will not go around registering complaints about speeches made by US presidents who spit on their Indian hosts -- there is business to be done and money to be made, and that is the only factor that will get the attention of governments to make them raise their voice in public on any issue. No one is pretending US is India's strategic partners or BFFs, least of all the people in the US state dept. and the govt.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 21:14
by Hari Seldon
^^+0.5
There was a time a decade odd ago during my grad student days in umrika when I naively believed that the khanate was a 'natural partner' for India this century... Suffice it is to say that I no longer hold any such view. BRF has been instrumental in educating moi about the gotus' machinations in India and outside.
Re: India-US Relations : News and Discussion
Posted: 17 Mar 2015 21:25
by UlanBatori
PM Modi may not get a vija but 700 others did in 2014 - not just vija but citjenship
Wonder what these ppl cite as reason:
I put a bomb in a passenger train and passengers' body parts were hanging from the burnt tree branches near the station, and this 3rd-world dictatorship is threatening to put me in jail for expressing my free opinion in that mannner!
How can a country offer 'political asylum' to citjens of a friendly free democracy? Is there some mismatch in laws? (Most likely: 650 may be using the gay-marriage issue? I don't think terror bombing is considerable fashioanable in the US, even if it is done in the turd-world by would-be James Bond types)
The answers must be on FINDLAW.com, if anyone can find it.