IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Kakkaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3894
Joined: 23 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Kakkaji »

Folks:

This deal is done. Not likely to stop now:

Rafale deal: French Defence Minister, Jean Yves Le Drian to arrive on September 22
NEW DELHI: French Defence Minister Jean Yves Le Drian is set to arrive here on September 22 along with CEOs of Dassault Aviation, Thales and MBDA to seal the 7.87 billion Euros deal for 36 Rafale fighter jets.

Defence sources said if all goes well, the Inter Governmental Agreement (IGA) will be signed on September 23.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Manish_Sharma »

Gyan please also list how many .22 bullets or catapults made of sheesham wood and high density granite pebbles can be bought instead of Rafales.

TIA
Karthik S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5380
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 12:12

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Karthik S »

^ :lol:
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60255
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by ramana »

We should close this thread once deal is signed.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by shiv »

ramana wrote:We should close this thread once deal is signed.
Never never. This thread should never be closed. There are still so many things to discuss prices, specs, kickbacks, alternatives, killing Tejas, reviving Tejas, Killing AMCA, reviving AMCA, Russians will feel bad, give Americans a chance, give the Swedes a chance, why not Eurofighter, cut the Rafale order, enhance the Rafale order, Egypt got them cheaper, we got them cheaper, Make in India, communalism in defence deals, gauraksha, khat pe charcha, integrating Russian weapons, integrating Brahmos, testing Garuda and Gruthma on Rafale, integrating Astra, Killing Astra, reviving Astra. Even 20 years is not enough for the MMRCA discussion
Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3031
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Cybaru »

^hehe .. not to forget the sightings from the golf course! :D
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Philip »

Advice.Head off to gay Paree and watch the bewithcing damsels at the Moulin Rouge.For more adventurous gents,the Pigalle has a lot to offer.
Bhaskar_T
BRFite
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 19:09

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Bhaskar_T »

If we close the thread, where do we discuss Rafale specifics, strategy, Rafale weapons, any possible follow on order, tracking deliveries, TOT sharing by Dassault because of this particular deal?

New dhaaga? IMO, this thread can be continued.
la.khan
BRFite
Posts: 480
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 05:02

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by la.khan »

shiv wrote:
ramana wrote:We should close this thread once deal is signed.
Never never. This thread should never be closed. There are still so many things to discuss prices, specs, kickbacks, alternatives, killing Tejas, reviving Tejas, Killing AMCA, reviving AMCA, Russians will feel bad, give Americans a chance, give the Swedes a chance, why not Eurofighter, cut the Rafale order, enhance the Rafale order, Egypt got them cheaper, we got them cheaper, Make in India, communalism in defence deals, gauraksha, khat pe charcha, integrating Russian weapons, integrating Brahmos, testing Garuda and Gruthma on Rafale, integrating Astra, Killing Astra, reviving Astra. Even 20 years is not enough for the MMRCA discussion
:mrgreen: :lol: Al-hakimi remains unsurpassed :D :rotfl: Very talk of closing this thread causes in me withdrawal symptoms :P
brar_w
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10694
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by brar_w »

The meteor would be sub optimal solution against a heavy AEW with the protection it deserves (figthers with BVR weapons and accompanied jamming). You would really need a heavy K-100 like weapon for that role, along with SA and targeting that can overcome the accompanying jamming. It is however the best weapon that could be offered and compared to the MICA_RF it will offer significantly better NEZ even though the rafale has signature reduction and EW to get closer and do the trade with the Mica. Even though it is still not fully integrated on the Rafale (will by the time IAF stands up a squadron) might as well go with the best weapon available.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60255
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by ramana »

It will be new saga after the deal is signed.

Time to retire this thread.

Thanks for feedback.
ramana
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by shiv »

Has the fat lady sung yet?
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Karan M »

waiting shiv, waiting

Image
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Gagan »

ramana wrote:It will be new saga after the deal is signed.

Time to retire this thread.

Thanks for feedback.
ramana
At least wait till the deal is formally announced, and its contours become clear.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21091
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Rakesh »

Who is gonna light up some stogies on Sept 23rd? :)

Image
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Manish_Sharma »

Admiral ji, before you go for Cognac, Coffee and Cigar, here is a small dessert for you to relish :

https://www.facebook.com/TejasMrca/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
Rafales for the Indian Air Force will be tailor-made fighters. The $2 Billion customizations include:

~ Integration and testing of Indian weapons, HMDS and targeting pod

Indian weapons customization includes Astra BVRAAM, Brahmos-NG ALCM and other munitions under development including PGMs and NGARM.

The costs will include integration and testing which is very expensive and time consuming as each change will have to be validated for RCS and SPECTRA suite’s calibration among other normal tests like separation, configuration etc. It also includes the cost of integrating the Topsight HMDS and Litening pod.

~ Higher thrust/ Improved engine

IAF wanted a higher thrust than the current 75KN wet thrust. Dassault/Snecma proposed the M-88-3/4E upgrade which would increase the thrust to 90KN which would translate to increased overall performance including an additional 1 Ton payload from the original 9 Ton, without compromising on fuel efficiency and life of the engine.

The improvement is done in such a way that the air-intakes doesn’t need a design change.

~ High altitude and Hot desert performance increase

The engine upgrade was the result of IAF requirements that the Rafale should be able to operate in both these conditions without losing performance, and payload capacity.

This translated to the overall aircraft and engines being modified to withstand searing temperatures and sand ingestion while operating in the western frontier as well as bone chilling cold while retaining its ability for short take-off with payload while operating out of Leh-Ladakh.

~ Anti-corrosion/ Harsh weather treatments

Indian jets are prone to a large variation in climatic condition while operating in different parts of the country.

This can adversely affect the aircraft’s life and availability. IAF has taken a leaf out of its experience in operating older jets under these condition and want the Rafales covered for these situation. The MKI fiasco was another reason why this clause was added to the requirements.
MohdKav
BRFite
Posts: 203
Joined: 18 Aug 2016 15:34

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by MohdKav »

Whats the point of all the shiny toys, when 4 idiots in camo can cross over the border and kill at will.
I have had it to the hilt
Viv S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5301
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 00:46

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Viv S »

~ Higher thrust/ Improved engine

IAF wanted a higher thrust than the current 75KN wet thrust. Dassault/Snecma proposed the M-88-3/4E upgrade which would increase the thrust to 90KN which would translate to increased overall performance including an additional 1 Ton payload from the original 9 Ton, without compromising on fuel efficiency and life of the engine.

The improvement is done in such a way that the air-intakes doesn’t need a design change.

~ High altitude and Hot desert performance increase

The engine upgrade was the result of IAF requirements that the Rafale should be able to operate in both these conditions without losing performance, and payload capacity.
Definite nonsense. India is buying Rafales in the spec F3R configuration with the existing M88-4E engines. The proposed 90 kN engine required modifications to the air intake.
Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3031
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Cybaru »

MohdKav wrote:Whats the point of all the shiny toys, when 4 idiots in camo can cross over the border and kill at will.
I have had it to the hilt
Although I am not in favor of this hammer, this is a different hammer for a different nail. This is to keep foreign states at bay and misadventure. This seems like what was proposed for the strategic command decade ago.

The 4 idiots will have to have a separate response, different kind of hammer and separate thread.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Indranil »

The admin of that page is slowly showing his depth, rather the lack thereof.

1. Topsight is the default HMDS for Rafale.
2. The state of readiness of the Indian ammunition that he speaks of varies from being on the drawing board to being intial testing. There is no question of us paying for their integration on the Rafale today!
3. The engine upgrade is not an Indian request, but one asked for from everybody including UAE. By the way, forget it being a ready solution, the Safran chief in March said that, ""It is time to ask the question whether it is appropriate to launch a study that would increase the engine thrust". You can read the interview here. At the time of the interview, they had not discussed this option with Dassault yet. If the thrust has to be augmented 20% without changing the inlet, or the dimensions of the engine, or the weight of the engine, Safran must have found djinn technology.
4. Please ask the the admin of the FB page what is the payload of carrying capability of our IL-76s/C-17s at Leh. And these employ high-bypass engines. We can talk about fighters taking off at MTOW later.
5. I would be happy to see the Litening pod integrated to Rafale. The Damocles were known to underperform with respect to the Litenings anyway. And the Litening were already integrated with the Mirages. So double pay for same thing.

I don't think our negotiators are as ignorant as the admin of this FB page. I think (s)he should stop trying so hard to justify the high price of Rafale on half-baked knowledge. It is one of the best planes in the world and comes at a premium cost. Whether, we should have paid that premium cost will always be a matter of discussion. I personally don't think so. I feel that we could have utilized the funds in a much better way. Our scenario is very different and I have listed them before.

There are strong rebuttals of the points I have raised before. If you are in a fighter entering an arena, you can only carry a fixed number of missiles (say 6). You would surely hope that 5 out of your 6 missiles work, rather than 3. There are counter-rebuttals too. for example what if I can afford two planes with 3 working missiles at the price of 1 aircraft with 5. So on and so forth. Unfortunately, the defense put forward for the Rafale deal in the open discussions have been quite uniformed at best, and speculative and biased at the worst.

P.S. edited for better grammar.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Philip »

BMos NG or BMos-M,the smaller lighter version ,will also be carried by MIG-29/Ks as well,apart from the MKIs,so there's nothing special about the uber expensive Rafale doing the same.Yes,the money could be better spent,but iot looks like the deal is done.In the current scenario,it will only be speeded up methinks.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Manish_Sharma »

Philip wrote:BMos NG or BMos-M,the smaller lighter version ,will also be carried by MIG-29/Ks as well....
Mig 29K can't even handle fuel tank properly, leave our Brahmost Missile :
Image
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21091
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Rakesh »

^ The official accident report has not been released. Don't jump to conclusions that the MiG-29K cannot carry a fuel tank. There are a host of variables that occurred in the accidental release of this tank. It does not happen every time the MiG-29K takes to the sky.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by NRao »

Khalsa
BRFite
Posts: 1814
Joined: 12 Nov 2000 12:31
Location: NZL

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Khalsa »

MohdKav wrote:Whats the point of all the shiny toys, when 4 idiots in camo can cross over the border and kill at will.
I have had it to the hilt
Sure and we all feel your pain but we don't get your attitude.

When I was very little I learnt that Army is not about a bunch of soldiers that hold hands and stand on the border forming one continuous line of string.
The border is and always be porous.

It is so at the American mexican border (tunnels and simple walk overs)
It is so at the Israeli Egyptian Border (tunnels)
It is so at the NK and South Korean border (tunnels / sea etc)

So stop having that attitude where it appears you are blaming the PMO, COAS and the Common Man holding the SLR at the chowk.

Do you know the size of the balls required to stand outside in pitch dark with no Night Vision Goggles as a sentry outside with a hostile civilian crowd that chants out Pakistan Zindabad and Hindustand Murdabad at you at night time and protect the guys inside your camp.

Do you realise that balls required to patrol alone or with another guy outside your camp knowing the terrorists have now been trained to cut off the heads and take them to Pakistan.

A new sense of butchery and training is being imparted to these terrorists by the Pakistanis.
They are mixing everything they can, mixing religion with Arabian butchery beheadings, defiling of the human corpse etc and trying to create a wave of shock terror troops whose aim is to either knock the wind out of the standard troops or provoke us on taking revenge on the resident restless civilian troops.

If you are frustrated please contribute with an idea.

I have seen some smart ones, squeeze the water supply from the Indian rivers that feed pakistan. F U C K the agreements for 2 years. Destroy the crops by then suddenly flooding downstream.

Some other form of economic warfare perhaps.

Or get them to lash out at the Balochis by assisting them openly and covertly.
Grant Afghans more weapons.


Remember what our thinking soldier said

Act, Don't React
-- General SundarJi
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5619
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by RoyG »

Should proly go in the relevant thread.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by shiv »

MohdKav wrote:Whats the point of all the shiny toys, when 4 idiots in camo can cross over the border and kill at will.
I have had it to the hilt
My response here
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7251&p=2047161#p2047161
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Philip »

F-16 drops fuel tank on garage during emergency - F-16 New
F-18 Drop Tank Test Disaster | Military.com
Eurofighter Flights Restricted After Fuel Tank Drops In Estonia

Just a few examples of aircraft which have lost their drop tanks!
Par for the course.
srikven
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 19
Joined: 27 Aug 2016 21:58

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by srikven »

Shiv Aroor Retweeted
Livefist ‏@livefist 10m10 minutes ago Noida, India
BREAKING: Indian approves deal for 36 Rafale fighter jets, reports @ReutersIndia.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Austin »

Cabinet approves purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets - source
India's cabinet cleared the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets from Dassault Aviation on Wednesday, paving the way for signing a deal that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is…
Profile image of authorReuters India
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5619
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by RoyG »

I don't trust any foreign aircraft in our inventory armed w/ nuclear cruise missiles. I'm sure there are backdoors built into the system to prevent weapons release.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by pankajs »

http://www.firstpost.com/india/rafale-d ... 14714.html
New Delhi: The government has cleared the much anticipated deal with France for 36 Rafale fighter jets which will cost 7.878 billion Euros and will be signed on Friday in the presence of French Defence Minister Jean Yves Le Drian.

Defence sources said that deal for the aircraft, the first fighter jet deal in 20 years, comes with a saving of nearly 750 million Euros than the UPA era one, which was scrapped by the Narendra Modi government, besides a 50 percent offset clause.

This means business worth at least three billion Euros for Indian companies, both big and small, and generating hundreds of jobs in India through offsets. The Rafale fighter jets, deliveries of which will start in 36 months and finished in 66 months from the date contract is inked, comes equipped with state-of-the-art missiles like Meteor and Scalp that will give the IAF a capability that had been sorely missing in its arsenal.

<snip>

The contract for the deal was already cleared by the Cabinet Committee on Security earlier. The price of the contract was fixed in May, sources said. Sources said the "vanila price" (just the 36 aircraft) is about 3.42 billion Euros. The armaments cost about 710 million Euros while Indian specific changes, including integration of Israeli helmet mounted displays, will cost 1700 million Euros.

Rest of the cost include spare parts, maintenance among others. Besides other features that make the Rafale a strategic weapon in the hands of the IAF is the Beyond Visual Range Meteor air-to-air missile with a range in excess of 150 km. Its integration on the Rafale jets will mean the IAF can hit targets inside both Pakistan and across the northern and eastern borders while still staying within India's own territorial boundary.
about 218 million euros per plane including armament + spares + maintenance + 50% offset.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60255
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by ramana »

Total cost 7.878 B Euros
So 36 aircraft 3.420 B Euros
Weapons 710 M Euros
Indian changes 1.700 B Euros
Rest for spares, maintenance
and 50% offset on the a/c/weapons/mods ~3.000 B Euros


The long range AAM also means first shot advantage in case of air to air combat.
This is the most important factor in downing the opposing plane. Based on many studies of air warfare since WWII.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Austin »

^^ HAL would be the obvious partner more so since this is strategic purpose aircraft.

The fact that we are also procuring spares which is like 5 years of Life Cycle support based on earlier news and 90 % uptime , Plus integrating Nuclear Weapons would need good amount of support from Dassault like flight testing and weapons system data etc , Hardwiring Rafale for Nuclear role would also need Dassault help , May be these Special Rafale would be hardened for EMP effect.

All in All its a good deal for IAF to take care of depleting squadron strength and for Special Purpose Role where M2K is now long in tooth but they can be diverted for specialised Conventional role like in Kargil for that matter even Rafale can be.
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by pankajs »

Not exactly on topic but related. Not intended for an Indian audience so does provide a different perspective. Mods if needed please move this to an appropriate thread.

http://www.defensenews.com/articles/def ... o-official
Defense Investment, Geopolitics Critical to Future NATO Official
PARIS — A prospective Indian order of the Dassault Aviation Rafale fighter jet is representative of offering long-term ties with France, a link that would help strengthen French security interests in the Indian Ocean, said Camille Grand, the next NATO assistant secretary general for defense investment.

Grand, who is currently the director of the think tank Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, will leave FRS and take up the post at NATO on Oct. 4, succeeding Patrick Auroy, a former senior official of Direction Générale de l’Armement, the French procurement office.

The NATO brief for Grand includes management of three key programs, namely ballistic missile defense, alliance ground surveillance, and the next-generation airborne warning and control system.

“For France, India is of major importance,” Camille told Defense News. A deal with India, a major power, is “very special as India has been a customer since the early 1980s,” he said. Dassault initially pitched its Mirage 2000 before offering the Rafale in New Delhi’s search for medium multirole combat aircraft.

“We’re close to a conclusion,” he said. The negotiations have been extremely complex, reflecting organizational complexity of the Indian government. A deal would open the door to long-term cooperation, as India will not stop at 36 units and intends to develop a fighter fleet over time. “I remain optimistic, and very cautious on the timeline,” he said. {I think this is a reasonable expectation. While it may not directly contribute to Make in India but the offset will make up to a certain extent.}

A pick by the Indian Air Force would be a major reference for the Rafale, which has already won deals with Egypt and Qatar, he said.

Winning an arms deal with New Delhi also has a geopolitical significance as France has long-standing defense and security interests in the Indian Ocean, along with India and Australia, he said.

France sees a role in the Pacific — a view shared by Britain — although that is more limited than the US interest. But the countries in the Asia-Pacific region are keen to see a European engagement, to rely not solely on the US.

<snip>

On the media leak on the DCNS Scorpene submarine for India, there are “dirty tricks” in the arms business, with the leaks often arriving at a sensitive time in negotiations, Grand said. Australia is right to ask for tight security procedures and it remains to be seen if the Indian submarine has truly been compromised.

<snip>
Chandragupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3469
Joined: 07 Dec 2008 15:26
Location: Kingdom of My Fair Lady

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Chandragupta »

Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Karan M »

now i hope the french dont get greedy and fck it up like with the scorpene. hope iaf gets another 60 of these birds and calls an end to the mmrca circus.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21091
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Rakesh »

^ my hope that there is no accusations of bribery which will bring even the 36 birds to a halt.
Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3031
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: IAF Rafale News and Discussions - 26 May 2015

Post by Cybaru »

Hopefully the french comply and give a good deal for the remaining portion of 60-100 birds and get that squared away as well soon.
Locked