Then he should say so rather than giving misleading headlines and quoting wrong figures to make some point which was not an issueKaran M wrote:Perhaps you are not tracking the foreign media, but many link Modi to 2002. It is an issue. And the more international folks see through the left-EJ-islamist cabals attacks on BJP/Modi, the better.chaanakya wrote:And how that makes it relevant for this election . It was't even an issue in this election. And how discussing 2002 makes General Election 2014 world's largest election. There is some hidden link which obviously others see and I am not able to connect.
The numbers are beside te point which the author is making.And from where he got his figures , just to cite one.
"Remarkably, at least 20 million Muslims entering India from Pakistan and Bangladesh have managed to vote illegally in Indian elections; some even running for office with the assistance of Muslim-appeasing politicians." Perhaps , that is the only thing which makes it largest democratic election in the world that he could come up with. Casting aspersions and implicitly questioning legitimacy by implication.
And how can you come up with right point with wrong numbers and facts? Basically he is feeding into steoreotyping . NaMO has never seen this as Hindu Muslim issue. His whole analysis is based on this old premise and he thinks somehow NaMo would address this as popularly believed.