
!! Anybody noticed the resemblance to Mr Bean ?
Men would automatically get attracted to Modi for his can-do and ballsy attitude. It is the women who are the loose cannon here because often they vote for the person who they find "nice and decent".Hari Seldon wrote:Wow, moi thought. Where from these newfound b@lls among 'em industry fede-rations only, living as they do on sarkari rations only.... well, here's the answer...
I see, so while amul baby talks to the men, apna sher has to make do talking to the women's wing. But, never worry, it is women who are the backbone of any society and of any impending change....Modi's address would, however, be restricted to the women's wing of FICCI on April 8. He would speak on topic "Unleash the entrepreneur within: Exploring new avenues".
I hope at least you believe that there is widespread resentment in the country . No one is happy across the spectrum. Right now that resentment is being chanelled through Modi. It is hope. IF Die-nasty comes back, that resentment will need other channels. And those channels are not going to be pleasant either for the nation or for the family - that much I am sure.Pratyush wrote:The way Modi is being projected by the media and sections of Intelligentsia. It seems to me that he is being set up to be huge failure. With the Die-nasty coming back (Post failure ) telling a dejected population, we told you so and promptly going back to loot and mis-governance.
I hope to first convert her & then scare her into voting. Let's see how it works. Typical DU studied, MBA types, high flying yuppie with a large yuppy group. Like a wolf, I'm eyeing her entire yuppy group for conversion.Aditya_V wrote:Chandragupta, if she is not the type to vote, dont waste your time.
There is a reason why I posted it here. Please use this & convert more & more.Arun Menon wrote:Mr. Chandragupta, do mind if I send this as an email to some of my friends?
OK, he is going to talk women. That is great! This is one of the key constituencies.Hari Seldon wrote: I see, so while amul baby talsk to the men, apna sher has to make do talking to the wopmen's wing. But, never worry, it is women who are the backbone of any society and of any impending change....
I think this answer was scripted irrespective of the question. Buddu would have answered (enacted the same scene) even if the question was about ToiletsArjun wrote:Wall Street Journal India gets it right this time: Rahul Gandhi Speech Hits Some Dud Notes
Mr. Gandhi took two questions from the floor – something he rarely does – but his meandering answers did little to provide solutions.
One participant asked a question about water usage in India. Mr. Gandhi used this as a launch-pad to talk about the complexity of India and how businessmen should “embrace” this – supposedly rather than complaining about unclear rules and a venal bureaucracy.
At one point, Mr. Gandhi re-enacted an encounter he had with the secretary of China’s prime minister (whom he didn’t name).
Mr. Gandhi dragged a participant on to stage to play the part of the secretary. He squeezed the man’s hand – as he said he had done to the Chinese official – telling him this is how China applies pressure to get things done.
Then he hugged the man in an embrace – again a re-enactment – to show India’s softer approach.
“Boss, our environment is not simple, we cannot give you simple answers,” he said he told the Chinese secretary. “There is no complexity in China.”
This was clearly pre-planned theater aimed to show Mr. Gandhi’s lighter side. But it was also unintentionally comic.Hilarious.....
On Twitter, reaction to the speech was mixed. The hashtag #PappuCII was trending after the speech. “Pappu” is a Hindi word that means a naïve person and CII refers to the organization that hosted the speech.
+108. Noble project. All the best.Chandragupta wrote: I hope to first convert her & then scare her into voting. Let's see how it works. Typical DU studied, MBA types, high flying yuppie with a large yuppy group. Like a wolf, I'm eyeing her entire yuppy group for conversion.
@sarkar_swati: Can someone try out the rate the speaker at http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/rate- ... ing-349964 Unable 2 place the ptr to 1, it automatically slides to 5 or 10 #Serious
Works alright to me. Why would they do such a juvenile thing anyway, they can simply add 100,000 votes at rating 8 from the backend, can't they?anmol wrote:HELP:
@sarkar_swati: Can someone try out the rate the speaker at http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/rate- ... ing-349964 Unable 2 place the ptr to 1, it automatically slides to 5 or 10 #Serious
What's the guarantee that non-politicians will not be corrupt?Supratik wrote:The peeve is to keep politicians out of the loop. Otherwise it will be another CBI.
Actually it is bad, India will be held hostage by two parties - or two individuals. Regional parties will push and pull policies of the so-called National parties. National parties should widen their base in the regions. Why are they not able to do so? An idea can be beaten by better ideas, so if the regional parties are dishing out bad ideas, then it forces National parties to come up with better ideas and policies. Selecting policies and a set of ideas - called the system/party is what ultimately matters to any country.Gus wrote:Is this the first election that is firmly trending towards a presidential style election - even if baba and NM are a bit coy and havent come out yet? It think it is good in itself. I am tired of this third front and refional parties.
Remember COW essay joke as a kid!fanne wrote:Pappu's answer remind me of a real life incident. It was few years ago, I had a distant nephew, then 2 years old. I had gone to see his family. Anyway, the dad of the kid (dad is my age), called my 2 year nephew and said to me that this kid is prodigy. At this age he can answer very complex questions. I was intrigued and asked for a demonstration. My co-brother then asked his son, what is 1 +1, promptly the two year nephew said, tu (two). I was impressed. But then I thought, gosh these parents are really pushing there kids to learn so early, maybe he learned basic maths. Then the next question was how much is 5-3, promptly the answer came 2. I said to myself now subtraction is hard, this kid is something, maybe his parents are not wrong in pushing him. Next question was what is 1008-1006, that also the kid answered right 2. Next question was what is 1 squared + 1 squared, that also was answered right, 2, even the next one 2 squared minus 2, which is 2. It went further on into calculus as well, he always gave the right answer of 2.
Now that reminds me of Rahul baba - How do you solve the water problem in India, or malnutrition, or pollution or low economic growth or high pollution growth or corruption - Answer India is a complex country, don't expect govt to solve it, you should do your bit/ (or the second answer where he would have called someone on stage and demoed how China and India solve problems.
I wonder if the question was Rahul baba when you are having kids, what his answer would be?
rgds,
fanne
The beehive concept is eerily close to the Varna system, no? Of course the 800lb gorilla in the beehive analogy is the "Queen bee"
The Rahul you didn’t know existed: How he floored the CII
by R Jagannathan Apr 4, 2013
For the first time ever, Rahul Gandhi made an impression with those who count – the people of India Inc. For the first time ever, he was cogent and gave us an insight into how he thought of the country and its problems.
He may not have a clear answer, or even a workable solution, but he did have a clear view on how India works or doesn’t. The big statement he made was a simple one: We are not an elephant. “We are a beehive.” He got a well-deserved standing ovation for his views at the Confederation of Indian Industry in Delhi today.
In comparing India with China, and why India does not seem to work as efficiently as its biggest neighbour, Gandhi said India was not really a top-down economy. It fizzes from below. It is a buzzing beehive and the beehive has its own power, its own complexity. And our solutions lie in realising our strength as a beehive.
A beehive’s power comes from its ability to act collectively by giving each member of the hive a voice and a chance to do his or her thing. This is where the state has failed, where the system is jamming things up.