India-US Strategic News and Discussion

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

Lame Duck ? Obama is thy name.His paranoia which is manifesting itself in his snooping on ordinary Americans and use of drones for domestic surveillance,is alarming Americans across the board who see in him the "New Nixon"!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ma ... -lame-duck
Beleaguered Obama looks to fight back as critics ask: is he a lame duck already?

IRS, AP, Benghazi … this past week, the president has been forced to confront a series of damaging scandals that could derail his second term before it has really begun
Beleaguered Obama looks to fight back as critics ask: is he a lame duck already?

Paul Harris contributor jan 2013
Paul Harris in New York
guardian.co.uk, Friday 17 May 2013 14.00 BST

Barack Obama: the new Nixon? Photograph: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

It is not a comparison that many people thought would ever get much traction.

But, assailed this week by multiple scandals and at the mercy of a furious press, President Obama has endured a legion of pundits wondering if he is the 21st-century Richard Nixon – and whether his second term is already a lame-duck disaster.

Certainly conservative writers have leapt at the idea that the now beleaguered Obama can be mentioned in the same breath as the shamed 37th president who left office early after the Watergate scandal.

They have looked at revelations that the Internal Revenue Service singled out conservative groups and that the Justice Department targeted AP journalists in a secret sweep of their phones as signs that Obama's administration is paranoid and over-reaching its power. Then they have added a healthy dose of outrage over whether or not the White House manipulated reaction to the death of four Americans in an attack on the US diplomatic mission in Libya.

"Benghazi, IRS – son of Watergate?" wrote conservative writer Cal Thomas amid a plethora of similar headlines. But it was not just the right wing. Liberal Democrat congressman Michael Capuano reacted to the IRS reports by saying: "There's no way in the world, I'm going to defend that. Hell, I spent my youth vilifying the Nixon administration for doing the same thing."

Indeed, even Buzzfeed used an animation of Obama's face morphing into Nixon's.

Long-time Washington observers have been shocked at how rapidly it seems that Obama's second term appears to have come off the rails. It has been barely six months since he was celebrating a comfortable win over Republican challenger Mitt Romney in the 2012 election and delighting his liberal base with a promise of four years of progress and reform.

"It has been downhill since the state of the union address in February, and it is going to be a tough road from here on in for him. It is a very bleak period for the White House," said Professor David Cohen, a political scientist at the University of Akron.

The three scandals that have dominated the headlines this week – the IRS, the spying on AP and the latest Benghazi revelations – have also only added to series of other problems that the Obama White House has encountered as it seeks to map out a meaningful second term.

Obama has been hit by intense criticism from his liberal base and rightwing Republicans over his enthusiastic use of unmanned drones to kill suspected Islamist militants abroad. A hunger strike at Guantánamo Bay has also highlighted his failure to fulfil a long-standing promise to close the controversial base. Finally, in the wake of the tragic Newtown school shooting, Obama staked a huge amount of political capital on tightening gun controls. Yet, despite huge public backing, he was defeated by intense lobbying from the gun industry.

It has added up to a sense, for some, that Obama's second term has been cut adrift and is watching its influence drain away. "His lame-duck status has come a couple years early. The defeat on the gun control issue was a real embarrassment," said Cohen.

Experts say that Obama's problems lie not so much with a newly galvanised Republican party that scents political blood in the water, but with his own Democratic party. As the White House becomes increasingly distracted and focused on damage control – for example, suddenly releasing a 100 emails linked to Benghazi on Wednesday and sacking the IRS chief – its ability to keep its own members of Congress disciplined diminishes.

With half an eye on the mid-term elections of 2014, many Democrats will now be wary of being too closely linked to a scandal-tainted Obama. Getting them to vote to pass the White House's desired legislation will be difficult. "It is going to be harder for him to rally his own party to get behind him. A president's power always diminishes with each day of a second term but a scandal speeds up that process," said Larry Haas, a political commentator and former aide in the Clinton White House.

The situation is also likely to get worse. The Republican party controls the House of Representatives and so has the power to hold committee hearings and issue subpoenas as part of investigations it chooses to pursue on any of the scandals. It has already this week publicly grilled attorney general Eric Holder on the IRS and AP situations – setting a tone that is likely to be repeated in the months to come and ensure the scandals get regular boosts of life.

"The House will continue to have investigation after investigation. This will be going on for years," said Steve Mitchell, a Republican political pollster and founder of Mitchell Research.

However, there are some who warn that the tides of Obama's political fortunes could turn again. He still wields a lot of power in the White House, including the ability to push an agenda using presidential executive orders.

He is also likely to still be able to pursue his ambitious aim of securing immigration reform as a landmark achievement of his second term to match his healthcare law during his first period in office.

Mindful of demographic changes and the fast-growing power of Hispanic voters, many Republicans are aware that signing up with immigration reform is good politics for their party. They are unlikely to let a desire to win political points over a weakened Obama get in the way of the broader aim of improving their image with Hispanic communities.

"The politics of immigration changed dramatically after the presidential election. That continues to be the case. Both parties want to do it," said Haas.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60291
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by ramana »

Shani effect. it acts whether you are a Hindu or not.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13924
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Vayutuvan »

SADE sAthi you mean? So the end is in sight - 2015 ish
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

Dreadful casualties in Mid-West tornados.
Heaven's "drone strikes" as one wit Put it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 24560.html

At least 91 feared dead including 20 children as massive tornado rips through Oklahoma
Children pulled alive from wreckage as rescuers search for survivors with many believed to be trapped under debris
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Nandu »

Immigration bill passes senate committee.

I know some negatives have been written about its impact on Indian businesses, such as the more stringent H1B requirements. However, I think overall, it is pretty good for India and Indians.

H1B cap goes up.
Faster GCs for more qualified people.
Once GC process starts, H1B spouses can work (a biggie, imho).
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by arun »

US Secretary of State to visit India for the fourth Indo-US Strategic Dialogue on June 24.

John Kerry to visit India on June 24
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Prem »

arun wrote:US Secretary of State to visit India for the fourth Indo-US Strategic Dialogue on June 24.

John Kerry to visit India on June 24
Indian or South Asian Visit ?
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by svinayak »

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/334 ... ctors.html

Amway India Chairman, 2 Directors arrested
Kozhikode(Ker) May 27, 2013 (PTI)

Network marketing firm Amway's India Chairman and CEO William S Pinckney and two company Directors were arrested here today on charges of financial irregularities.

The two directors are Sanjay Malhotra and Anshu Budhraja, crime branch sources said.

The arrests were made on a complaint of a woman who claimed to have incurred loss through the network and on the basis of three cases registered against the company last year in Wayanad district, they said.

Police had questioned the trio earlier this month and had asked them to report again today for further questioning. They were arrested when they arrived at the police station.

Last year, the crime branch (economic offences) wing here had conducted searches at the Amway office at Thrissur, Kozhikode and Kannur as part of its crackdown on money chain activities. Their godowns at these centres were closed and goods produced were also seized.

The searches were launched following a complaint lodged by Visalakshi of Kozhikode claiming that she had incurred losses.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

Quite a turn up for the book what?! The RT channel is using many western experts,etc.,to focus upon events that might put it in a better light than the US.

American broadcaster Larry King back on the airwaves... on a Russian channel

Shaun Walker

Moscow
Wednesday 29 May 2013

Larry King, the veteran American broadcaster, is to host a political talk show on Russia Today, the Kremlin-funded television channel.

Mr King, 79, who left CNN in 2010 after 25 years at the network, will present “Politics with Larry King” from next month. The channel claims that the programme will be a “mould-breaking political talk show”.

“I have always been passionate about government and issues that impact the public, and I’m thrilled at the opportunity to talk politics with some of the most influential people in Washington and around the country,” said Mr King in a statement.

It seems unlikely that he will interview any Russian political figures, and instead will focus on US politicians.
American broadcaster Larry King back on the airwaves... on a Russian channel
Shaun Walker
Moscow

Wednesday 29 May 2013
Larry King, the veteran American broadcaster, is to host a political talk show on Russia Today, the Kremlin-funded television channel.

Mr King, 79, who left CNN in 2010 after 25 years at the network, will present “Politics with Larry King” from next month. The channel claims that the programme will be a “mould-breaking political talk show”.

“I have always been passionate about government and issues that impact the public, and I’m thrilled at the opportunity to talk politics with some of the most influential people in Washington and around the country,” said Mr King in a statement.

It seems unlikely that he will interview any Russian political figures, and instead will focus on US politicians.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7100
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by shyamd »

Tom Donilon will be replaced by Susan Rice today as the US Nat sec advisor to Obama. This is not released in the press yet or officially announced
Cosmo_R
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3407
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Cosmo_R »

Written in 2010

1. "....where he sees America building bigger, better relationships with China and India. "
2. "In the lead-up to the president's recent trip to India, Donilon acted as the most vocal proponent in top-level meetings for Obama to punctuate his South Asia visit with a proposal for India to join the U.N. Security Council. According to the administration official, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice objected on the grounds that the move might produce tension among other Security Council aspirants such as Brazil and Germany. The president agreed with Donilon.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... ml?hpid=z2
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13924
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Vayutuvan »

A snippet from Wikipedia entry on Ambassador Susan Rice
Awarded a Rhodes Scholarship, Rice attended New College, Oxford, where she earned a MPhil in 1988 and DPhil in 1990. The Chatham House-British International Studies Association honored her dissertation entitled, "Commonwealth Initiative in Zimbabwe, 1979-1980: Implication for International Peacekeeping" as the UK's
most distinguished in international relations.
May be she got turned against India by the British. What was India's role in that Commonwealth initiative?

Also, quoting the following two pieces from Wikipedia without comment.
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, a longtime mentor and family friend to Rice, urged Clinton to appoint Rice as Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs in 1997.[5] Rice was not the first choice of Congressional Black Caucus leaders, who considered Rice a member of "Washington's assimilationist black elite."
During the 2004 presidential campaign, Rice served as a foreign policy adviser to John Kerry.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

AS posted earlier,the revelations of the US's NSA snooping (monitoring all forms of communication)at home and even in the UK through the "PRISM" project has generated much "heat" worldwide.Now the latest revelations show a "heat map" of the world where the max. snooping has taken place.It includes India,ranked 5th with ...a staggering 6.3 Billion reports! This is a gross violation of India's sovereignty and privacy of its people and the GOI must protest most vigorously to the US and take diplomatic action too.Action must also be taken against the service providers/sites who have allowed the atrocious covert US surveillance to have taken place.

Boundless Informant: the NSA's secret tool to track global surveillance data

Revealed: The NSA's powerful tool for cataloguing data – including figures on US collection

• Boundless Informant: mission outlined in four slides
• Read the NSA's frequently asked questions document


Pl. check out the heat map in the link.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ju ... datamining

Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 8 June 2013
A snapshot of the Boundless Informant data, contained in a top secret NSA "global heat map" seen by the Guardian, shows that in March 2013 the agency collected 97bn pieces of intelligence from computer networks worldwide.
boundless heatmap The heat map reveals how much data is being collected from around the world. Note the '2007' date in the image relates to the document from which the interactive map derives its top secret classification, not to the map itself.

Iran was the country where the largest amount of intelligence was gathered, with more than 14bn reports in that period, followed by 13.5bn from Pakistan. Jordan, one of America's closest Arab allies, came third with 12.7bn, Egypt fourth with 7.6bn and India fifth with 6.3bn.

The heatmap gives each nation a color code based on how extensively it is subjected to NSA surveillance. The color scheme ranges from green (least subjected to surveillance) through yellow and orange to red (most surveillance).

The disclosure of the internal Boundless Informant system comes amid a struggle between the NSA and its overseers in the Senate over whether it can track the intelligence it collects on American communications. The NSA's position is that it is not technologically feasible to do so.

At a hearing of the Senate intelligence committee In March this year, Democratic senator Ron Wyden asked James Clapper, the director of national intelligence: "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?"

"No sir," replied Clapper.

Judith Emmel, an NSA spokeswoman, told the Guardian in a response to the latest disclosures: "NSA has consistently reported – including to Congress – that we do not have the ability to determine with certainty the identity or location of all communicants within a given communication. That remains the case."

Other documents seen by the Guardian further demonstrate that the NSA does in fact break down its surveillance intercepts which could allow the agency to determine how many of them are from the US. The level of detail includes individual IP addresses.

IP address is not a perfect proxy for someone's physical location but it is rather close, said Chris Soghoian, the principal technologist with the Speech Privacy and Technology Project of the American Civil Liberties Union. "If you don't take steps to hide it, the IP address provided by your internet provider will certainly tell you what country, state and, typically, city you are in," Soghoian said.

That approximation has implications for the ongoing oversight battle between the intelligence agencies and Congress.

On Friday, in his first public response to the Guardian's disclosures this week on NSA surveillance, Barack Obama said that that congressional oversight was the American peoples' best guarantee that they were not being spied on.

"These are the folks you all vote for as your representatives in Congress and they are being fully briefed on these programs," he said. Obama also insisted that any surveillance was "very narrowly circumscribed".

Senators have expressed their frustration at the NSA's refusal to supply statistics. In a letter to NSA director General Keith Alexander in October last year, senator Wyden and his Democratic colleague on the Senate intelligence committee, Mark Udall, noted that "the intelligence community has stated repeatedly that it is not possible to provide even a rough estimate of how many American communications have been collected under the Fisa Amendments Act, and has even declined to estimate the scale of this collection."

At a congressional hearing in March last year, Alexander denied point-blank that the agency had the figures on how many Americans had their electronic communications collected or reviewed. Asked if he had the capability to get them, Alexander said: "No. No. We do not have the technical insights in the United States." He added that "nor do we do have the equipment in the United States to actually collect that kind of information".

Soon after, the NSA, through the inspector general of the overall US intelligence community, told the senators that making such a determination would jeopardize US intelligence operations – and might itself violate Americans' privacy.

"All that senator Udall and I are asking for is a ballpark estimate of how many Americans have been monitored under this law, and it is disappointing that the inspectors general cannot provide it," Wyden told Wired magazine at the time.

The documents show that the team responsible for Boundless Informant assured its bosses that the tool is on track for upgrades.

The team will "accept user requests for additional functionality or enhancements," according to the FAQ acquired by the Guardian. "Users are also allowed to vote on which functionality or enhancements are most important to them (as well as add comments). The BOUNDLESSINFORMANT team will periodically review all requests and triage according to level of effort (Easy, Medium, Hard) and mission impact (High, Medium, Low)."

Emmel, the NSA spokeswoman, told the Guardian: "Current technology simply does not permit us to positively identify all of the persons or locations associated with a given communication (for example, it may be possible to say with certainty that a communication traversed a particular path within the internet. It is harder to know the ultimate source or destination, or more particularly the identity of the person represented by the TO:, FROM: or CC: field of an e-mail address or the abstraction of an IP address).

"Thus, we apply rigorous training and technological advancements to combine both our automated and manual (human) processes to characterize communications – ensuring protection of the privacy rights of the American people. This is not just our judgment, but that of the relevant inspectors general, who have also reported this."

She added: "The continued publication of these allegations about highly classified issues, and other information taken out of context, makes it impossible to conduct a reasonable discussion on the merits of these programs."

Additional reporting: James Ball in New York and Spencer Ackerman in Washington
nvishal
BRFite
Posts: 992
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 18:03

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by nvishal »

India fifth-largest target of U.S. electronic snooping
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/i ... epage=true

Image
The extent of NSA’s surveillance of Indian communication traffic is greater than its electronic snooping efforts in China, Russia and Saudi Arabia

Continuing its series of exposés on the manner in which the United States has been harvesting electronic communication from national and international communication traffic, The Guardian newspaper has acquired top-secret documents about a data mining tool used by the National Security Agency (NSA), called Boundless Informant, “that details and even maps by country the voluminous amount of information it collects from computer and telephone networks.”

A snapshot of the Boundless Informant data, contained in what The Guardian describes as a top secret NSA “global heat map” gives an insight into the sheer volume of data being collected by America’s most secretive intelligence agency: In March 2013 alone, it harvested a whopping 97 billion “pieces of intelligence from computer networks worldwide.”

Iran was the country where the largest amount of intelligence was gathered, says the newspaper, with more than 14 billion reports in that period, followed by 13.5 billion from Pakistan. Though the U.S. administration may justify the focus on these two countries because of the nuclear programme of the former and because many terrorist groups operate from the territory of the latter, the fact that India clocks in fifth with 6.3 billion pieces of information collected from the country’s computer and data networks in one month alone is bound to cause alarm and consternation in New Delhi. Jordan and Egypt are the third and fourth most intensively watched countries.

Though the Obama administration has attempted to reassure domestic public opinion in America that its spying operations are mainly directed outwards, The Guardian says the Boundless Informant documents show the NSA “collecting almost 3 billion pieces of intelligence from U.S. computer networks over a 30-day period ending in March 2013.”

The newspaper reproduced one of the NSA’s colour-coded “heatmaps,” according to which countries are more extensively monitored. The colours range from green, for the least amount of surveillance, to yellow, orange and finally red for those subjected to the most surveillance. India is coded orange. The extent of the NSA’s surveillance of Indian communication traffic is greater than its electronic snooping efforts in China, Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Gagan »

Industrial surveillance?
Political Surveillance: India's corrupt Netas and Babus? Narendra Modi? The Gandhis?
Military: Nuclear and Missile programs, DRDO guys. India's military + Technological capabilities are expanding in a massive way.

India is an independent state, they want intel to know which way India is turning to, given that India is headed to being the third largest economy.
krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5881
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by krisna »

People for Profit – The NGO story 2010 article but says he same about efforts of us to gather intelligence thru various ways including NGOs.
Funding India NGOs

Something very strange is happening. There are some 33 lakh (3.3 million) NGOs, operating in India – for the 20 crore (200 million) odd families in India. That would be one NGO for every 70 families.

These mushrooming NGOs are getting billions of US$ in funding.
What is the source of these funds …

The rich, the poor and the middle class in these ‘charitable countries’ are themselves deep in debt. Where are they getting the money from? Why are they being so liberal towards India? What is the source of these funds?
Where this money going …

Is it going as thinly disguised aid to Naxal affected areas – where some ‘Christian’ missionaries are working to‘save’ the tribals? Is it going towards publicity for causes which are thinly disguised trade issues. For instance, child labour – which is, in many cases, a system of apprenticeship for traditional skills.

Or are these NGOs promoting policy frameworks which are distorting India’s social systems? The Population Myth /Problem /Explosion for instance was promoted for the first decade by Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation and USAID. Are they behind the NGOs which are promoting Section 498 laws as a legal solution – a solution that ‘benefits’ about 5000 women and creates about 150,000 women as victims.
These are laws and policies which are undermining the Indian family system. Which country in the world has a stable family structure with such low divorce rates as India?
The Clintons, The Gates, The Turners, et al

The ‘progressive-liberal’ establishment of the West is viewed rather benignly in India – and seen as ‘well-wishers’ of India. Many such ideas are welcomed in India without analysis. These ideas are viewed positively, as the source of such initiatives is seen as well-intentioned. These rich money-bags in cahoots with the State’s propaganda machinery, the media and academia are creating false messiahs, hollow idols and instant saints.
read all.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by svinayak »

They want to use NGO to create a revolution in India. This is not strange. SOme of the officials have already admitted it
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

The NGOs are the fifth-columnists within the country,whose insidious role I have observed close hand for over 30 years and have been writing about for the last 15 years.The are foreign funded ,and oriented towards two objectives;the first being collection of information on a wide range of subjects,both on civil society and on military matters.The second is to indoctrinate and manipulate civil society,especially religious minority groups into sabotaging India's interests and promoting those of the foreign powers.Such as we have seen in the Kundamkulam anti-nuclear protests (which have suddenly subsided after the SC verdict) and other genuine environmental issues,subtly steering them into the supporting MNC interests.In this,those NGOs (secretly) of the US are past masters at subversion whose track record can be seen all over the developing world.

The secret global snooping by the US using the "PRISM" and "Boundless Informant" programmes of the NSA including India,the world's 5th largest target,only underscores the duplicity of the US which describes us as "strategic friend" but treats us like a "strategic enemy"!
Last edited by Philip on 09 Jun 2013 22:25, edited 1 time in total.
vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5836
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by vishvak »

It is indeed strange how Indians, who make the largest democracy, are 5th largest target of 'PRISM'/'boundless informant' snooping.

Perhaps there is much more to 'PRISM'/'boundless informant' snooping than what meets the eye.
krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5881
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by krisna »

Image

stunning--
Ironically muslim Indonesia gifts 18 ft Hindu GOd Saraswathi to christian USA.

ideally India should have done this but for sickular politics. :(
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60291
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by ramana »

Most GOI functionaries from those located in PMO to peons in Andhra have gmail accounts as a CBM with massa.
And also to prevent IB from snooping on rediff accts!!!

But fifth place will cause some reflection on current govt's "jee huzoor" attitude to US.
Cosmo_R
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3407
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Cosmo_R »

krisna wrote:Image

stunning--
Ironically muslim Indonesia gifts 18 ft Hindu GOd Saraswathi to christian USA.

ideally India should have done this but for sickular politics. :(
Same point I made in the Secularism thread. Secularism in India simply means anti-majoritarianism. MMS lost sleep over Dr Hanif in OZ but not over 26/11. Mind you at the same time, GoI is breathlessly pursuing observer status at OIC. Think about the contradictions.
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Gagan »

Secularism in India indeed means anti majoritism.
India is ruled by people who are non majority, their projected leadership is also non majority.

It is not an accident that there are a zillion NGOs who are funded from outside of India operating under an umbrella provided by non majority leaders of India.

Their intentions are anybody's guess.

In the past centuries we have seen how the chinese were addicted to opium and a generation was destroyed and a nation subjugated. I wonder if the same is happening to India as we speak.

The current crop in power is non progressive, status-quoist, are not in control of the situation, have allowed things to deteriorate due to lack of empathy

A secular BJP in power will maintain good relations with all nations, the west most importantly because of common ideals of trade and capitalism. With Russia because of decades of dependence and future dependence due to military and technology related trade.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by CRamS »

Gagan, not raising any shackles, but isn't that precisely the problem, in India, there doesn't seem to be any majority per se, its all about caste, religion, and language.

On USA's snooping on India, it re-enforces several things in my mind.

The disconnect between surface-level bonhomie and the contempt US holds India at. I mean talk about "strategic partners" and then subject India to the such levels of snooping even ahead of China. Thus, it only re-enforces the famous CRamS's order: Never go by US rhetoric and statements of intent, go by sound logic of US interests. So, you might hear US berate China day in and out on cyber warfare or whatever, and India as some kind of munna, but a quiet analysis reveal that US & China agree on a lot of issues, notably, rendering India a eunuch country in a box with TSP. So, I can bet you, most of US's snooping was monitoring India's troop movements, military plans etc to protect its TSP munna.

Second, pretty sure all of India's high-tech, both civilian and defense R&D is under US scanner.

Then of course, how much of the snooping is about influencing India's domestic politics to suit US interests, I don't know. I am sure dorks in Undy-TV, CNN-IBN etc receive "tips" from "un-named sources".

Finally, a small percentage of the snooping is for legitimate reasons: the underworld Islamist gangs with nerve center in TSP that rule Bollywood. India of course can't touch them because India is too sickular onlee, or for fear that they will burn Mumbai down, but US makes sure that the money laundering doesn't effect its interests. India's demi God, Sharukh Khan regularly gets patted down when he visits US. Due to his well endowed connections for sure.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

US spooks wanted to "disappear" the "leakers" of the ultra-secret NSA PRISM and Boundless Info snooping programmes. Amazing that in this day off so-called "civilisation",the age old methods of Al Capone and co. are in vogue with US intel entities.But why should we be surprised?After all the CIA and the Mafia were "two sides of the same coin",according to Chicago mafia boss,Sam Giancana,because they carried out the dirty work for the CIA,including by the Giancana family's own revelations,that they "hit" JKF,RFK,and Marilyn Monroe too!

US security officials said NSA leaker, journalist should be 'disappeared' – report
http://rt.com/news/intelligence-officia ... eaker-452/
A US editor has alleged he overheard security officials saying that the NSA leaker and the Guardian columnist who broke his story should be “disappeared.” Leaker Edward Snowden said that American spies often prefer silencing targets over due process.

“In Dulles UAL lounge listening to 4 US intel officials saying loudly leaker & reporter on #NSA stuff should be disappeared recorded a bit,” the Atlantic's Washington-based editor-at-large Steve Clemons tweeted on Sunday.

According to Clemons, four men sitting next to him at the airport “were loud. Almost bragging” while discussing an intelligence conference they had just attended hosted by the Intelligence and National Security Alliance.

Clemens said he was unsure of the men's identities or which agency they worked for, and told the Huffington Post that one of them was wearing “a white knit national counter-terrorism center shirt.” Clemons also recorded part of their conversation and snapped some photos, hoping that “people in that bz will know them.”

“But bad quality,” he noted about the quality of the photos. “Was a shock to me and wasn't prepared,” he wrote on Twitter.

Clemons’ post immediately went viral, and his Twitter account was flooded with responses.

While some users were anxious to learn more details and hear the conversation, others lashed out at the blogger, saying he should have verified the information before posting it.

Clemons said his view on the “disappear” part was that the statement was one of “bravado” and a “joke” – but a very “disturbing” one. He said he felt obligated to make it public because he thought the speakers were senior intelligence officers.

It was a “disconcerting set of comments offered in public,” Clemons explained.
From the Washington Pissed...sorry,Post!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html
The outsourcing of U.S. intelligence raises risks among the benefits

Jeffrey MacMillan/For The Washington Post - Booz Allen’s cyber facility in Maryland is one of nine virtually-connected centers and labs in the Cyber Solutions Network, each equipped with the tools and expertise used to counter cyber threats.
By Robert O’Harrow Jr., E-mail the writer

The unprecedented leak of National Security Agency secrets by an intelligence contractor, including bombshells about top-secret programs to collect telephone records, e-mail and other personal data, was probably an inevitable consequence of the massive growth of the U.S. security-industrial complex.

Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old man who identified himself as the source behind stories in The Washington Post and the Guardian newspapers, has worked at Booz Allen Hamilton and other intelligence contractors. Before entering the private sector, he says he held a series of technical jobs at the Central Intelligence Agency.

Graphic
NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program
Timeline of surveillance

Timeline of surveillance

A timeline of surveillance in the United States from 2001 to 2013: from the Patriot Act to the PRISM program.

Special Report
Man who leaked NSA secrets reveals himself
Man who leaked NSA secrets reveals himself

Barton Gellman, Aaron Blake and Greg Miller

Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old Booz Allen Hamilton employee, says he’s done nothing wrong in revealing government surveillance programs.

Leaker made clear he knew risks
The risk of outsourcing intelligence
Eager to expose ‘surveillance state’
Wonkblog: Is he crazy to seek asylum?

Government, companies argue that surveillance is lawful, limited
Government, companies argue that surveillance is lawful, limited

Robert O’Harrow Jr., Ellen Nakashima and Barton Gellman

U.S. officials and Internet firms say there was no unlimited access or data mining of company servers.
Obama, welcome to Bush territory
Obama, welcome to Bush territory

Greg Miller

Defending his counterterror tactics, the president finds himself in a situation similar to his predecessor’s.
Surveillance programs renew debate about oversight
Surveillance programs renew debate about oversight

Robert Barnes, Timothy B. Lee and Ellen Nakashima

Can the kind of transparent oversight Americans expect exist with efforts to keep them safe?
Feinstein: NSA programs useful in New York, Mumbai terror plots
Feinstein: NSA programs useful in New York, Mumbai terror plots

Aaron Blake

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein says the NSA surveillance programs have been useful in two major terrorist plots.

In a statement Sunday, Booz Allen said, “Booz Allen can confirm that Edward Snowden, 29, has been an employee of our firm for less than 3 months, assigned to a team in Hawaii. News reports that this individual has claimed to have leaked classified information are shocking, and if accurate, this action represents a grave violation of the code of conduct and core values of our firm. We will work closely with our clients and authorities in their investigation of this matter.”

Snowden was among tens of thousands of private intelligence contractors hired in the unprecedented push to “connect the dots” after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. They work side by side with civil servants as analysts, technical support specialists and mission managers. An unknown number have access to secret and top-secret material.

Several years ago, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence estimated that almost one in four intelligence workers were employed by contractors.

The growing reliance on contractors reflects a massive shift toward outsourcing over the past 15 years, in part because of cutbacks in the government agencies. It has dramatically increased the risk of waste and contracting abuses, government auditors have found, in part because the government has repeatedly acknowledged that it does not have a sufficient workforce to oversee the contractors.

But given the threat of terrorism and the national security mandates from Congress, the intelligence community had little choice. In a briefing presentation several years ago, the ODNI estimated that 70 percent of the intelligence community’s secret budget goes to contractors such as Booz Allen Hamilton.

“We Can’t Spy . . . If We Can’t Buy!” the briefing said.

The former director of naval intelligence, retired Rear Adm. Thomas A. Brooks, said in a report in 2007 that private contractors had become a crucial part of the nation’s intelligence infrastructure.

“The extensive use of contractor personnel to augment military intelligence operations is now an established fact of life. . . . It is apparent that contractors are a permanent part of the intelligence landscape,” he said.

Since Sept. 11, more than 30 secure complexes have been constructed to accommodate top-secret intelligence work in the Washington area. They occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons, about 17 million square feet.

An examination by The Post in 2010 found that 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the country.

At the same time, tens of billions of dollars have been spent by intelligence agencies and the Department of Homeland Security on computers, networks, satellite systems and other technology to collect and mine information. Those systems have been shown repeatedly to be vulnerable — to attacks and exploitation by both hackers and insiders.

The most notable example is Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, 25, who downloaded more than 700,000 classified documents from secure military networks. He is accused of passing them on to the anti-secrecy Web site WikiLeaks, in what was the largest leak of classified documents in U.S. history.

Manning is being court-martialed on 22 charges, including aiding the enemy, and could face life in prison. He obtained access to the documents while working as a low-level intelligence analyst on assignment in Baghdad, during the war in Iraq.

The documents leaked by Snowden have been fewer but far more sensitive, including top-secret material. None of Manning’s documents were top secret.

Snowden’s release of scores of pages of top-secret material about a data surveillance program, code-named PRISM, and an NSA program to collect information about millions of phone calls from Verizon underscores one of gnawing worries in the national security community: The more people allowed in the top-secret tent, the higher the risk of leaks.
Garooda
BRFite
Posts: 580
Joined: 13 Jul 2011 00:00

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Garooda »

Lawsuit_Filed
CLASS ACTION AMENDED COMPLAINTPlaintiff, Larry Klayman, a former U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor, and PlaintiffsCharles and Mary Ann Strange (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this action on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of persons defined below. Plaintiffs hereby sue Barack Hussein Obama,Eric Holder, Keith B. Alexander, Lowell McAdam, Roger Vinson, Verizon Communications, theU.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and the National Security Agency (“NSA”), (collectively“Defendants”), in their personal and official capacities, for violating Plaintiffs’ constitutionalrights, Plaintiffs’ reasonable expectation of privacy, free speech and association, right to be freeof unreasonable searches and seizures, and due process rights, as well as certain common lawclaims, for directly and proximately causing Plaintiffs mental and physical pain and sufferingCase 1:13-cv-00851-RJL Document 4 Filed 06/09/2013.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Philip »

Europe warns US: you must respect the privacy of our citizens

EU officials demand answers on what data snooping programmes entail and whether they breach human rights

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ju ... us-privacy
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Prem »

Jhujar wrote:="arun"US Secretary of State to visit India for the fourth Indo-US Strategic Dialogue on June 24. b] John Kerry to visit India on June 24[/b][/url]
Indian or South Asian Visit ?
Swal Kaa Jwab

Kerry to visit Pakistan, India this month
LAMABAD: US Secretary of State John Kerry will travel to Pakistan and India this month for the first time since taking office, officials in Delhi and Islamabad said on Thursday.
Kerry's scheduled visit to Pakistan is the most senior foreign trip to be announced since Nawaz Sharif was sworn in as Pakistani prime minister after May elections.“US Secretary of State Mr John Kerry will be visiting Pakistan in the last week of June,” Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry told a weekly press briefing in Islamabad.He said the specific dates of Kerry's visit would be announced once they had been finalised.US officials previously said Kerry would visit once the new government was in place.A senior Indian government official said Kerry would be in New Delhi on June 23 and 24, adding that Afghanistan would be one of the main topics up for discussion.“They (the Americans) have repeatedly said that they welcome India's role in Afghanistan... They would like to see it go forward,” said the official on condition of anonymity.“We would like to get from the secretary a better idea of what the American plans are,” the official added.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25389
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

Stakes High as Kerry Heads for India - Chidanand Rajghatta, ToI
If one goes by the five-minute video message John Kerry has just issued ahead of his first visit to New Delhi on Sunday as secretary of state for the fourth US-India strategic dialogue, you'd think bilateral ties never had it so good. There are the usual boilerplate references to "one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century," close collaboration "in almost every field of human endeavor" and even the forgotten chestnut about US support for India's inclusion as a permanent member of an expanded United Nations Security Council.

"The United States not only welcomes India as a rising power; we fervently support it," Kerry asserts in a message that opens with "namaskar," even though, from all accounts, he hasn't had the time of the day for India since he took office in February, such has been his focus on other hotspots in the world. There are mandatory references to common democratic traditions, shared perceptions, people-to-people ties etc, a yawn-inducing list of palliatives that has been flogged to death.

So how then does one explain the angry, accusatory, India-specific letters that 180 Congressmen and 40 Senators have written to President Obama and Kerry on Thursday, virtually asking them to sanction New Delhi if it cannot be brought to heel on a raft of issues? These range from the Indian government's decision to buy certain IT and clean energy equipment only from domestic firms, to court decisions on life-saving drugs that Washington sees as violation of intellectual property norms.

"We urge you to press for swift action and make clear to your Indian counterparts that the United States will consider all trade tools at its disposal if India does not end its discriminatory practices," lawmakers, primed by industry pressure groups, sternly told the administration in an unprecedented letter, even as US businesses launched something called an "Alliance for fair trade with India," a pressure lobby of the kind they have not put together even against China.

Well, it turns out that the United States and India have much to disagree about on the margins of the strategic dialogue, although the good news is that they will do so without being disagreeable. Beneath all the broad smiles and bonhomie, there will be much grinding of teeth as both sides push back at each other in the trade and economic sphere, the US intent extending its economic primacy and India determined to ensure that does not happen at the expense of its people. On its part, India has already indicated that it will not be browbeaten. "We are not going to lie down and play dead," one Indian official said at a background briefing on the visit.

While the strategic dialogue has been frontloaded with this unprecedented attack on India from Congress and industry over trade ties (whatever happened to the India Caucus and US-India Business Council? one scribe wondered at a briefing), bickering over economy and commerce are not the only wrinkles. New Delhi has deep misgivings over the speed and manner in which Washington has allowed Taliban, Pakistan's proxy in Afhganis, to come to the negotiating table in Doha, with prospect of a power grab in Kabul.

The move jeopardizes Indian equities in Afghanistan, and Kerry's statement that "US and India share a strong and enduring commitment to Afghanistan's peace and prosperity" sounds lame judging by the speed with which Washington is abandoning Kabul, leaving New Delhi holding the can. Mercifully for India, Kerry spiked a proposed Pakistan leg of this visit, which had raised the bogey of a re-hyphenation following a sell-out to Pakistan over Taliban, although Indian officials said they had not made this an issue. Kerry will go to Pakistan next month, US officials said, even as the media pack accompanying him was more interested in his stopover in Doha, where he will discuss the Syria and the upcoming dialogue with Taliban.

All is not bleak on the bilateral front though. There certainly is merit in the claim by officials from both sides that the two countries are now engaged in a staggering range of fields, from higher education, which will get a separate block of time with Kerry's engagement with HRD Minister Pallam Raju, to science, technology, and space cooperation. But the hottest area, the one that excites both sides, is the proposed supply of US natural gas to India, and American help in India's exploration and exploitation of its shale gas reserves. "This is an area that could become the next big thing," a senior Indian official said at a briefing.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13924
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Vayutuvan »

> C. Rajghatta
Mercifully for India,
What deference does it make? Let him visit Pakistan all India has to do is to give a lukewarm welcome to the secretary. The negotiations aren't going to change for better/worse. May be we (India) are not there yet to act like China where they demanded and got President Bush (IIRC) skipping Japan. Hoping that we get there soon.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25389
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

Defence & Security Cooperation High on Agenda of Strategic Talks - The Hindu
Defence and security co-operation, besides energy and higher education, would rank high on the agenda of talks between India and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry who will arrive here on Sunday for the India-U.S.A. strategic dialogue.

India will also seek from the U.S. information on the opening of a Taliban office in Qatar, besides putting across its concerns about the H1B and L category visas that have been cause for concern among the Indian industry, especially the IT sector.

The issue of market access, nuclear liability bill and the American National Security Agency’s internet snooping programme are also likely to be discussed. Mr. Kerry, who will be visiting India since his appointment as the Secretary of State five months ago, will also co-chair the India-U.S. Higher Education dialogue.

Besides co-chairing the strategic dialogue with External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, Mr. Kerry will also meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Mr. Kerry is leading a high-powered delegation that also consists of the U.S. Energy Secretary, NASA Director besides U.S. military chief for the Pacific region Admiral Samuel Locklear and top officials from the State Department and Homeland Security.

This is the “first high-political interaction in the second term of the Obama presidency,” Vikram Kumar Doraiswami, Joint Secretary (Americas) Division in the External Affairs Ministry said.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25389
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

Sizing up Kerry - Edit, The Hindu
When John Kerry arrives here for the fourth round of the India-United States strategic dialogue, he should not be surprised to discover that as much attention might be focussed on getting a measure of him and what he represents for South Asia, as on the actual agenda of the discussions. This is legitimate curiosity. This will be Mr. Kerry’s first visit to India as Secretary of State, and his reputation as someone who is “sympathetic” to the Pakistani security establishment precedes him. Despite New Delhi’s keenness to avoid hyphenation with its neighbour, Indian officials are bound to watch him closely for any sign of those sympathies. All the more so because of rapidly moving events in the region: the fast-approaching U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2014; the Taliban’s new legitimacy, and the Pakistan Army’s role in the Doha road-map. Afghanistan, and Indian nightmares about a possible return of the Taliban and its allies as the rulers of the country, will doubtless figure high in the talks. New Delhi will be looking to Mr. Kerry — he and the Pakistani Army Chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, are said to have been in intense backroom negotiations to nail down the Doha process with the Taliban — for reassurances.

Aside from Afghanistan, the strategic dialogue will address a range of other security, defence and geopolitical issues, as well as co-operation in trade, science, technology, agriculture and energy. In his talks with External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, Secretary Kerry is likely to insist that India press ahead with economic decisions that will give American service and financial sector companies greater access to Indian markets. There will also be discussions on India’s nuclear liability law, which the U.S. continues to see, unreasonably, as an obstacle to the implementation of the civilian nuclear pact. India too has concerns, particularly the cuts in work visas for IT professionals. On regional strategic issues, Mr. Khurshid must emphasise that the election of Hassan Rouhani as the next President of Iran creates an opening for the resolution of outstanding issues but that progress will be impossible if Washington continues to act as if nothing has changed. India and the U.S. will also exchange views on China’s new leadership. While it is tempting to see a certain degree of strategic congruence between the two countries here, the reality is more complex. If the rise of China has the potential to destabilise the region, so does the Obama administration’s ‘Asia pivot’. Rather than divisiveness and containment, Asia needs a strategic architecture that is inclusive and open. Mr. Kerry should not be left in any doubt about the fact that this is what is best for India. {This is a patently wrong advice but it is not surprisng, coming as it does from left-supporting N.Ram's The Hindu}
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60291
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by ramana »

Hindu as susual is painting pro US picture due to its editors and owners.

There is nothing strategic about India-US ties especially whenits based on oepeingup Indian economy for a few H1B visa the US needs anyway!!!!

Meanwhile


Economic Times:

LINK

India and US have to decide what is strategic about their ties
Rajesh Rajagopalan

Whatever adjectives are being used to describe the state of India-US ties — as Secretary of State John Kerry comes visiting —it is clear that the relationship is not where it should be or where it was expected to be. New Delhi has to share a significant part of the blame because in the years after the India-US nuclear deal, it has seemed much more uncertain about what it wants from the relationship and much more sceptical about its benefits.

These opinions are now being echoed in Washington.
As the US withdraws from Afghanistan next year and the national election campaign kicks off in India, the prospects for any immediate improvement are dimming. It is time both sides returned to what is truly strategic in their relationship.

Instead, the two sides are now back to their old habit of talking past each other. India appears to be focusing on the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and its likely consequences. The US wants to discuss trade, intellectual property rights and climate change. These are important concerns and should be discussed but they cannot be the centrepiece of a strategic partnership. Far from being issues that will strengthen partnership, these are issues that will divide and dilute it. If this relationship can be built at all, it will be on the issues the two countries are tip-toeing around: China and the Asian and global balance. The longer the two sides fail to recognise this, the longer this relationship will stagnate.


{I think the US is not interested in those topics for they think they can lead the Indian elephant by the trunk with a pliant leadership dependenton visas for their progeny in US and meantime PRC will needle India just to remind their station in Asia. We don't even know yet if the PRC vacated the 19km incrusiion in Aksai Chin.}

Both sides need to realise that on some issues, they simply do not have common interests — especially on regional issues. The US would like New Delhi, Islamabad and Kabul to work together, but this is easier said than done. The change of regime in Pakistan is promising, but India has been down this particular garden path before. On important strategic issues such as Pakistan's support for terrorism and the future of Afghanistan, there is no indication yet that the Nawaz Sharif government can wrest policy control from Pakistan's army. Irrespective of what Washington wants, India needs to pursue its own interests in these areas rather than simply complaining to Washington about Islamabad's behaviour.

On Afghanistan, similarly, the US's primary interest is in winding up its involvement. It hopes it can talk to the Taliban to reach some sort of settlement that will serve as a fig leaf to cover its withdrawal, though it will not change its mind about withdrawing even if the Taliban do not oblige it on this issue. The US hopes that Afghanistan does not again become a haven for international terrorism, but there is little that the US can do about it. It is rare that you can win around the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield and there is little reason for the Taliban to give in when they are clearly winning.

New Delhi, correctly, does not take much comfort in these negotiations because India is going to suffer much more as the ISI and its terrorist proxies return to Afghanistan.

But New Delhi is also being unrealistic. It would be nice if Washington would fight to the last American to protect Indian interests in Afghanistan, but that will not happen. New Delhi needs to do what is necessary in Afghanistan: in the near term, help bolster the Afghan security forces so that they can tackle the Taliban better and in the long term build alliances with other forces in Afghanistan to sustain Indian interests if and when the Taliban take over Kabul. Platitudes about Afghanistan's stability or regional solutions will do little to resolve the problem.

{With Kurshi* in charge all you will get is platitiudes and inanities.}


China Delusion

The issue both sides should be focusing on is China and the Asian and global balance. On this crucial issue, both sides are living in their private fantasy islands. The Obama Administration has revived the old delusion, much favoured in Democratic party circles, about a US-China understanding to jointly solve the world's problems.


{Shades of Bill Clinton claiming PRC as sheriff of Asia in 1998 after they blatantly sold nukes to TSP}

Between the Asian pivot and the recent "shirt-sleeve summit" in California, Washington shouldn't be surprised if Asian powers are confused about what to make of America's steadfastness. India is in the grip of its own China delusion. Though there is little indication that China has changed its long-standing policy of containing India within South Asia or even about the border dispute, there is unnatural optimism that India can frame a middle path between China and the US.

Such a middle path might have been possible if, like the Soviet Union during the Cold War, China was a distant power rather than a neighbour with which India has disputes both over territory and over each other's relative power position. If the India-US strategic partnership has to regain its footing, they should stop wallowing in regional and trade issues and recapture what "strategic" means in their relationship.

The writer is professor of International Politics, JNU, Delhi
The India-US realtionship will be a mercantile one for the long future.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60291
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by ramana »

With this attitude how can there be any relationship even tactical let alon strategic?

US is hiding DCH and could have been a party to the 26/11 attack by way of having supplied and agent provacator.
a_bharat
BRFite
Posts: 745
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 09:54

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by a_bharat »

ramana wrote:With this attitude how can there be any relationship even tactical let alon strategic?

US is hiding DCH and could have been a party to the 26/11 attack by way of having supplied and agent provacator.
I think US either wanted to drag India into their so called war on terror, or, wanted to create a situation between India and Pakistan and use that as a ruse to neutralize both countries' nukes.
Kati
BRFite
Posts: 1909
Joined: 27 Jun 1999 11:31
Location: The planet Earth

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by Kati »

With Snowden in background, shouldn't Bharat make a formal request to
Unkil to handover Rabinder Singh for defection with sensitive info? It'll
be interesting to see how Kerry-ullah reacts.
rajithn
BRFite
Posts: 470
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 01:52

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by rajithn »

ramana wrote:With this attitude how can there be any relationship even tactical let alon strategic?

US is hiding DCH and could have been a party to the 26/11 attack by way of having supplied and agent provacator
Not surpised with N.Ram's pontification of "inclusiveness" in Asia.

And disgusted that Khurshid actually defended the U.S Gov PRISM program!!!!!

And last but not the least, the U.S still provides sanctuary for another traitor of Bharat, Rabinder Singh.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by svinayak »

http://www.fairobserver.com/article/ind ... m=linkedin

India: Asia’s Geopolitical Darling
Third Largest Economy

Still, as a series of developments in recent weeks prove, New Delhi is nonetheless emerging as an important pivot point on Asia’s geopolitical stage. One set of events attests to India’s long-term economic significance. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development reported that India, even with its current decade-low growth rate of five percent, has likely moved past Japan as the world’s third-largest economy and the second largest in Asia. It added that by the end of this decade, India may even have supplanted China as the world’s fastest-growing major economy, and that over the next half-century the country’s GDP per capita will increase more than eight-fold.

Reinforcing these points is a new report by WealthInsight, a London-based consultancy. It projects that India will possess the world’s fifth-largest population of high net-worth individuals by 2020.** Both it and the OECD estimate underscore the assessment made last fall by the US National Intelligence Council that “India will be the rising economic powerhouse that China is seen to be today.”
John Kerry in India

It is now the Americans’ turn to pay court with Secretary of State John F. Kerry, who arrived arrived in New Delhi on Monday for the annual US-India strategic dialogue. His predecessor, Hillary Clinton, kicked off the inaugural dialogue three years ago by proclaiming that bilateral relations were “an affair of the heart.” The Pentagon’s most recent strategy review singled out India as the only country deemed “a strategic partner,” and US Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta made clear during his trip to New Delhi last summer that the Obama administration sees India as a “linchpin” in this strategy. Stating that the United States “views India as a net provider of security from the Indian Ocean to Afghanistan and beyond,” Panetta proposed the formation of a long-term strategic partnership, one that featured greater Indian access to the latest US military technology and a defense trade relationship that went beyond a focus on one-off transactions to include joint research and co-production efforts.

New Delhi has so far played hard to get when it comes to US overtures. So look for Washington to sweeten the pot during Secretary Kerry’s current three-day visit, as well as during Singh’s trip to the United States in a few months.

With India having been overlooked for so long in world politics, it must be gratifying for leaders in New Delhi to see their geopolitical dance card now filling up. But the question they should ponder is just how much more ardent the wooing would be if the country got its strategic act together.

*Apropos of India’s plight, a recent article in The New York Times reports that the website created for the “India Everywhere” public relations campaign has not been maintained and is riddled with broken links.
shyam
BRFite
Posts: 1453
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 11:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Post by shyam »

Boundless Informant: the NSA's secret tool to track global surveillance data

Image

As per the map, collection of Indian intelligence data by US is one of the highest in the world. More than that from US itself, China and Russia. Countries higher than India are TSP and Iran.
Post Reply