that does not mean the cops riot control procedures abd going in with military tactical gear is to be condoned - thats an issue which will get pursued interestingly enough by both the right and the left
Sorry but both left and right are wrong on that. Media impressions are not as important as the safety of the police personnel involved - they too bleed, they have spouses and parents and children and friends too.
India is particularly backward in this respect, so let's not make comparisons and claim superiority. Remember the Golden Temple incident as a particularly glaring example: the buggers sent in the soldiers BAREFOOT with no covering fire, into a machine-gun/grenade/bazooka hell. How many died? 100? 300? Totally wasteful, criminally wasteful.
The Russians dealt with the Moscow Theater siege by the Chechen suicide wimmens by sending gas into the whole place (yes, killed many innocents too, but I don't see what choice they had). I would have cleared a safe field for the soldiers to go in (buildings can be rebuilt, media noise will died down, it was pretty old anyway, soldiers cannot be brought back to life, nor their limbs replaced). Who the *** was impressed that the soldiers went BAREFOOT? The terrorists were impressed?
Same with the "Go get those bast*rds by the scruff of the neck" orders given to the first platoons sent to clear the Kargil heights, with no proper intel, no recon. Same arrogant idiocy. Same with paradropping soldiers into Jaffna with no glimpse of intelligence and without clearing landing areas : 600 killed as they came down!!!!
Same (no lesson learned), sending those boats down the lake in Chattisgarh(?) where the Maoists massacred the soldiers using anti-tank weapons and machineguns.
Same with Indian police operations in most areas: send a bunch of ill-prepared, poor, terrified fellows with only lathis or .303s at best, to face terrorist armed with AK-47s, grenades, etc.
These were/are VIOLENT RIOTERS. There is only one effective response: the promise of OVERWHELMING power, SURE promise of destruction, with no opening provided to hurt the law enforcers. That means flak jackets, kevlar body armor, face protection, arm protection, leg protection, lethal weapons, whatever it takes to suppress the armed opposition immediately and most definitely.
Yes, they terrify. They should. They expect and force immediate surrender, and they tend to make the surrendered rioters lie face down, tie their hands and ankles with plastic ties, and drag them off to jail. That way they can't do any more damage to others or to themselves. Then the Judge/jury and lawyers can decide what to do with them. Message: you don't want to be in that position, GET THE **** OFF THE STREETS!
They are also a welcome sight to people whose livelihoods are being looted and raped and burned down by *&^%$ sh1ts. More power to the police and army.
That is one aspect I have come to understand very well about American response to violence. Value life - of the law-abiding. DON'T give the advantage to the outlaws.
Military tactical gear was precisely the right thing. At least it's better than sending Drones
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/cool.gif)