They might as well have said it has to be TFTAIn terms of design, metallurgy and performance parameters, the rifle and sight shall be ‘State of the Art’

They might as well have said it has to be TFTAIn terms of design, metallurgy and performance parameters, the rifle and sight shall be ‘State of the Art’
https://theprint.in/security/indian-arm ... ynHi4FEB9dThakur_B wrote:Army chief has commented in a recent press conference that Northern Command shall be getting sniper rifles by month end.
ramana wrote:5719 new sniper rifles will be inducted into the Army this month, replacing Russian 7.62 mm Dragonov. New sniper rifles include Beretta .338 Lapua Magmum Scorpio TGT and .50 Calibre Sniper Rifle M95 MS Barrett, amongst others. Welcome to the Army. Go forth and serve with honour. https://t.co/jN7WhlOnz3
it will if not already has been setup. These are much more powerful rounds and need different training methodologies. usually rifle sells of this size are accompanied by a training program too. Trainers would be very quick to point out the deficiencies in existing program. If IA listen to them when IA finds out that they are now able to take out a target upwards of 2miles comfortably, IA will roll out the program.rkhanna wrote:
It would be more interesting if (even due to knee jerk) we actually developed a proper Sniper Program to go along with the kit
https://ria.ru/20190124/1549790346.html
How are things with your joint venture with the Indian Ordnance Factory Board?
- Literally in the last days of 2018, our specialists once again went to Delhi for negotiations. I personally met with representatives from the Indian side, with Rostec, Rosoboronexport and FSMTC, we are really discussing the potential production of the Kalashnikov in India. By the end of January 2019, we must formulate the main parameters of this plant. It should be understood that the Indians are already producing a product that they have mastered by themselves; we are, in fact, invited first of all in order to improve the quality.
- They all sit on your old "Kalash".
- In the process of negotiations, we explained that over the past 50 years, the Kalashnikov assault rifle, to put it mildly, has changed, we have new modifications, more interesting, and, most likely, we will come to the conclusion that we will change the product that has now been delivered troops. This will not be the AK of the 100th series, it will be similar to the AK-203, that is, a much more technically advanced product. As far as we know, this suits the Ministry of Defense, and the production side is also ready, it will be somewhat more expensive, but, in my opinion, this is the case when the price is justified.
https://ria.ru/20190124/1549790346.html[/quote]Austin wrote: - In the process of negotiations, we explained that over the past 50 years, the Kalashnikov assault rifle, to put it mildly, has changed, we have new modifications, more interesting, and, most likely, we will come to the conclusion that we will change the product that has now been delivered troops. This will not be the AK of the 100th series, it will be similar to the AK-203, that is, a much more technically advanced product. As far as we know, this suits the Ministry of Defense, and the production side is also ready, it will be somewhat more expensive, but, in my opinion, this is the case when the price is justified.
Basically, the 200-series of AK rifles are the 100-series with the factory installed AK Upgrade Kit that was introduced earlier. We reported about the introduction of this kit which you can read about by clicking here. These upgrades are mostly related to ergonomics and include minor new parts. The core operating system of the rifles is retained identical to that of 100-series of rifles.
The 200-series of AK rifles are primarily designed for exporting and sales to domestic Russian law enforcement agencies. Although they look similar, these rifles should not be confused with the AK-12 and AK-15 that were recently adopted by the Russian military. The AK-12 and AK-15 are arguably more advanced firearms with several more significant design changes such as the permanently fixed gas tube with the gas block disassembled from the front.
Who cares about the infantry!!!souravB wrote:AK15 would be the same wastage of money as AK203 would be. Also IA would never take the risk since it is not inducted in significant quantities in any infantry. Armenia has ordered AK12 and AK15.
I do not know what is the special love Army has for this specific calibre other than it can be fired from an AK and has more mass than a .223. It will even negate that advantage with heavy recoil that comes with the gun.
There are other ways the stopping power of 223 can be increased, one is to increase the bullet weight from 4g to 5g. We are already ordering plenty of carbines that could be used for CI/CT ops.
Let the AK203 come, use it to better arm our CAPF, CG, Police forces, BSF.
T.L.D.R arm forces under MHA with the 6.5L AKs, let infantry and other units have better.
I do not think so.. well may be there is but the Caracal is a good rifle with refined design. Passing our Army's testing method is no joke.ks_sachin wrote:Just thinking is there a geopolitical angle to the Caracal?
There is a lot of heartburn in Pakistan due to our vastly improved relationship with the UAE..
unable to push in bands of terrorists, they have taken to lot of sniping, both to scare off indian patrols and for upar hand.Thakur_B wrote:https://theprint.in/security/indian-arm ... ynHi4FEB9dThakur_B wrote:Army chief has commented in a recent press conference that Northern Command shall be getting sniper rifles by month end.
Barrett M95 .50 Cal
Beretta's Victrix Armament Scorpio TGT in .338 Lapua Magnum
Let the fun times begin.
Thakur_B wrote:The inconsistencies in Kalashnikov deal news gives me a feeling we are not buying AKMs but rather an AKM spinoff in 7.62x51. it's just a gut feel, so take it fwiw.
Sir aap Ke muh mein ghee Shakkar !!!!Thakur_B wrote:The inconsistencies in Kalashnikov deal news gives me a feeling we are not buying AKMs but rather an AKM spinoff in 7.62x51. it's just a gut feel, so take it fwiw.
I thought RR would get New AK 7.63x39. They already use and reg inf New 5.56 and 7.62x51 as Dmr. Non critical arms would get make in India 5.56.souravB wrote:^^to add
Will IA top brass and babus be brave enough to take the risk of inducting a new class of rifle?
rkhanna wrote:Thakur_B wrote:The inconsistencies in Kalashnikov deal news gives me a feeling we are not buying AKMs but rather an AKM spinoff in 7.62x51. it's just a gut feel, so take it fwiw.
The AK308 already comes in the 762/51 Calibre. But i believed its derived from the AK12 series.
https://static-ssl.businessinsider.com/ ... 3%20pm.png
https://www.businessinsider.in/The-Russ ... 480126.cms
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/201 ... pe-ak-308/According to the press release: “Weapon is based on AK-103 with certain design features taken from AK-12 and is chambered for 7.62×51 round. At the moment, weapon is being prepared for trials. (…)
BSF 100 VidhwansakAditya_V wrote:But can't help on how much the cancellation of Denel AMR in 2004 as aCBM with Pakis harmed us. I hope the army also procured lots of Vidwanshuks
Not sure SF operate as part of grid in Valley.nachiket wrote:If the drawbacks with the 5.56 round are enough to force the IA to switch back to 7.62, how do we explain the fact that the Para SF battalions heavily involved in COIN ops seem to do fine with the TAVOR and we have heard no complaints about it?
I would go ahead and make a statement that the number of pros and cons for both the rounds are similar. It is a matter of establishing a doctrine and follow it with the selection of a round.ks_sachin wrote:Not sure SF operate as part of grid in Valley.nachiket wrote:If the drawbacks with the 5.56 round are enough to force the IA to switch back to 7.62, how do we explain the fact that the Para SF battalions heavily involved in COIN ops seem to do fine with the TAVOR and we have heard no complaints about it?
Also the effectiveness of 5.56 became a red herring. The real target was the INSAS as RR which predominate are AK.
The Caracal is for reg ing I think.
I added an extra zero in the calc. Mia Culpa. So the cost comes around at ~$540M for the entire infantry spread over 7-8 years. I do not understand how much IA is going to save if the Kalashnikov deal goes through.souravB wrote: What I do not understand is, at ~$900 a piece(for 70K pieces, larger order further reduces price), 6L SS716 comes around at ~$5B spread over 7-8 years.
94K+350K additional. (RFI already out, Make in India)ks_sachin wrote:94K carbines - if regular infantry is getting ak thn where will all these carbines end up?