Bharat Rakshak

OMG jihadi loose to USA
What gives??
Sleepy Joe said the other he loves watching Babar Azam bat
Maybe sending messages to Jernails better ask your boys to loose for IMF loans

Another round of discussions between Pakistan and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has ended inconclusively due to disagreement over new income tax rates for salaried and non-salaried persons and the imposition of standard 18% sales tax on agriculture and health sectors’ goods.

The IMF insisted on merging the slabs related to salaried, non-salaried and other incomes.

If the revised income tax rates are accepted, the tax contribution of the salaried class will jump to Rs540 billion in the next fiscal year, said the sources. To absorb this increase in tax rates, even a 30% pay hike will not be sufficient. #simple solution - all bakis should give themselves a very halaal 72% hike

The IMF has asked Pakistan to end all special tax regimes, like the low income tax on gains made by investing in the stock market and bank deposits.

The global lender has recommended treating these gains as part of normal income. The IMF is pushing Pakistan to increase the burden on the salaried class until the country recovers higher taxes from the non-salaried business individuals. # only fauji afsarans will be exempt

Manish_P wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024 13:25
PS- when is MBS coming hain?

saip wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024 08:40 Another funny thing is he DID NOT keep the wickets. Rizwan did. And that cost Pakis big time in the super over. Every time the crooked Amir bowled a wide, US stole a bye. All in all those wides cost 4 runs because Rizwan could not gather.

la.khan wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024 14:53

saip wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024 08:40 Another funny thing is he DID NOT keep the wickets. Rizwan did. And that cost Pakis big time in the super over. Every time the crooked Amir bowled a wide, US stole a bye. All in all those wides cost 4 runs because Rizwan could not gather.

So, how many TVs in p@kiland went up in smoke?

Union Minister Ramdas Athawale has threatened Pakistan a day after a terror attack in J&K's Reasi killed 9 pilgrims and injured over 40 others. Athawale said that India will have to start a war against Pakistan and snatch PoK if such attacks keep happening. He said the attack on the same day as Narendra Modi took oath as PM was deliberate. Watch for more details.

SSridhar wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024 10:03

My sincere advice to TSP is not to dismiss this threat lightly.

Aditya_V wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024 11:18

SSridhar wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024 10:03 My sincere advice to TSP is not to dismiss this threat lightly.

Why will they, no point warning them . . .

Paakis were jumping with joy at the ‘drubbing’ that was supposedly received by PM Modi in the election. I will come to the ‘drubbing’ part later in the thread. First I want to talk about the joyously jumping Paakis though.

The poor ******** smelled a looming weakness in the GOI in the coming days, and being the simple-minded, binary-thinking idiots that they are, they decided to ‘send across a message’.

Mind you, this wasn’t the first time they did this to coincide with change of govt in India.

If you remember, even in 2014, just a couple of days before the new GOI was sworn in, the Indian Consulate in Herat came under a deadly attack. The date was 23 May and IIRC, the next GOI was to be sworn in on 26 May.

But fact remains that this is NOT a weak govt by any metric whatsoever, IMO.

Now back to the Reasi incident. I do feel that the Brown Panted rulers of Bhikharistan feel differently from me and truly believe that now there is a ‘weak’ govt in Delhi. So they gave a go-ahead to their soldiers in mufti to do what they do best – Kill unarmed, innocent ‘Infidels’.

This they did with brutal and clinical perfection. And they timed it near perfectly with PM Modi’s oath-taking ceremony.

What exactly happened in Reasi yesterday is fairly well-known, thanks to the mainstream and social media. But I think, this was about all that the simple-minded terror masters in Rawalpindi planned. Beyond that, they only had one plan – DENIAL!

Pretty soon, people were pointing fingers at TRF for having carried out the attack.

Now what is TRF, you might ask.

Well, TRF is just JuD branded in a different packing which itself is LeT in a new Salwar-Kameez, so that the truest ‘strategic assets’ of Bhikharistan cleverly stay one step ahead of possible sanctions, especially when the country itself is going begging to one and all for money.

Of course, fact remains that whatever shade of salwar-kameez they wear, they all are ultimately working on behest of the Brown Panted Ones sitting comfortably in Rawalpindi.

Of course, promptly came the denials by the TRF and the PAFF and their likes.

It wasn’t us, they are crying.

But too bad for them, no one believes them, and for good reason too.

Of course, the Brown Panted Ones in Pindi might still be sitting smugly, patting themselves on their backs for yet another spectacular ‘success’. There are thousands of expendables of TRF and PAFF for them to use and throw.

Which once again brings back to the present day GOI.

They have two choices – Either to retaliate, or not.

In either case, the collective opposition will cry merry hell because if they retaliate, then they will be accused of ‘milking’ the terror attack for political gains & if they don’t retaliate, then they will be accused of being weak.

In short, they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

Feel free to disagree with my statement above.

That said, I think a retaliation is quite in order for that very reason – it is better to be damned for retaliating than for NOT retaliating. That, and of course the reputations of the past two NDA govts of strong military retaliations to far lesser provocations than this.

kancha wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024 20:04 ...
Which once again brings back to the present day GOI.

They have two choices – Either to retaliate, or not.

In either case, the collective opposition will cry merry hell because if they retaliate, then they will be accused of ‘milking’ the terror attack for political gains & if they don’t retaliate, then they will be accused of being weak.
...

saip wrote: ↑07 Jun 2024 20:34 Anwar Maqsood says Pakistan's defeat against USA 'must be an IMF condition'
You may be right

PM Shehbaz orders reduction in power load shedding across Pakistan

The prime minister issued instructions to establish effective and active systems within distribution companies to facilitate timely registration of complaints regarding power outages.

Prime Minister Shehbaz emphasised that the purchase of new transformers must strictly adhere to international standards.

He also instructed relevant officials to utilise modern systems globally recognised for reforms in the energy sector.

Shehbaz called on provincial governments to fully support the campaign against electricity theft and ensure severe penalties for those involved.

He also issued strict instructions to curb load shedding and overbilling.

SSridhar wrote: ↑13 Jun 2024 17:09 'Deploy full spectrum of counter-terror capabilities': PM Modi reviews security situation in Jammu & Kashmir, talks to key officials
We warned here that Ramdhas Atwale's warning was not to be taken lightly.

Iyersan wrote: ↑13 Jun 2024 18:32 What does full spectrum of counter terror mean? Does it mean crossing the LoC and hitting the Brigade HQ of pakistan in Muridke or does it involve another surgical strike or does it involve another air strike. Or are we going to still only comb on our side of the border?

Iyersan wrote: ↑13 Jun 2024 18:32

SSridhar wrote: ↑13 Jun 2024 17:09 'Deploy full spectrum of counter-terror capabilities': PM Modi reviews security situation in Jammu & Kashmir, talks to key officials
We warned here that Ramdhas Atwale's warning was not to be taken lightly.

What does full spectrum of counter terror mean? Does it mean crossing the LoC and hitting the Brigade HQ of pakistan in Muridke or does it involve another surgical strike or does it involve another air strike. Or are we going to still only comb on our side of the border?

China has refused to fund fresh projects in Pakistan due to the lack of progress on the multi-billion-dollar China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Islamabad’s failure to honour its financial obligations.

China also has concerns about the safety of Chinese nationals working in the CPEC project as there have been attacks by terrorist groups.

China has invested over $25 billion in Pakistan for the project.

The CPEC, introduced in 2013 as the flagship extension of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), was expected to transform Pakistan into a regional hub for economic connectivity.

saip wrote: ↑14 Jun 2024 20:20 ^^It is almost one year old. But the PM of Pakistan went to China recently (he considered this to be more important than the budget session) for another boot licking session. What happened?

saip wrote: ↑14 Jun 2024 20:20 ^^It is almost one year old. But the PM of Pakistan went to China recently (he considered this to be more important than the budget session) for another boot licking session. What happened?

Jun 03 2024,

Why is Shehbaz Sharif really visiting China?

According to Husain, the real aim of Shehbaz Sharif's visit to China is to ensure that some of the maturities in the Chinese debt instruments that will be maturing in the next three years are rescheduled, which the Pakistani government is trying to dress up as a relaunch of CPEC "for public consumption".

The reason for such a move is that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which does not want its resources to be used to service Chinese debt obligations, has told the Pakistani government that an agreement will only be possible if there is no positive net outflow from Pakistan to China during the programme period.

Additionally,

A desperate Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his coalition government appear ready to go to great lengths to appease China. This strategy likely aims to secure concessions, payment deferments, and immediate assistance at the current critical juncture.

Beyond the media hype surrounding the revival of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Mr Sharif is working to secure a $15 billion rollover facility for five years and to persuade China to fund certain ‘big-ticket’ critical projects that Pakistan needs — but currently cannot afford — during his China visit last week. A businessman close to PML-N leadership shared this information in confidence.

“PML-N leaders aspire to attract hundreds of billions of dollars in investment to Pakistan over the next five years. If they succeed through diplomacy or luck, issues like poverty, unemployment, inefficiency, debt and trade gaps will start falling into place,” he asserted privately over the phone.

Commenting on the China visit, Gohar Eijaz, former minister of industries and commerce caretaker, noted, “The government is attempting to extend the repayment period of the independent power project (IPP) loans from China, which were set up under CPEC, for an additional five years. Additionally, they aim to kickstart CPEC phase two with a greater focus on business-to-business relationships.”

The government is scrambling to secure Beijing’s appeasement to cushion probable economic blows from the IMF

In both the 2018 and 2022 joint statements, China described relations with Pakistan as China’s “highest priority in its foreign policy.” But in the 2023 joint statement, as well as in the 2024 joint statement issued earlier this month, China-Pakistan relations for China are described as just “a priority in its foreign relations.” The adjective “highest” to describe Pakistan’s priority in China’s foreign relations has been omitted in recent statements.

This raises a whole host of questions. The fact the description has been published twice in successive joint statements suggests it was not a mistake. This then opens the possibility that China may have decided to downgrade relations with Pakistan from “the highest priority” to “a priority” in its foreign relations. It is perhaps a reflection of how, 10 years after choosing CPEC as the flagship BRI project, China now views its relations with Pakistan.

RCase wrote: ↑15 Jun 2024 01:40 ^^^
The actual reason:
"Pakistan decided not to accept India's hegemony in the T20 world cup and maintain their H&D. Misfortunately (sic) YYY did sazish to make it rain just for the match, else Pakistan would have won the World cup " AoA

jash_p wrote: ↑14 Jun 2024 23:06 AOA !!!!!!
Pakis are out of T20 world cup officially.