Islamic South Asia
X-Posting from
"Managing Pakistan's failure" Thread
We often hear Indians saying, the Two-Nation Theory was wrong and it has been proven wrong by the facts on the ground - more Muslims are being killed in Pakistan every day than in India where they enjoy security of their person, property and faith.
We often hear this in discussions between Indians and Pakistanis on the Internet forums and in other media. In fact one would notice Indians of the Nehruvian bent trying to rub it in in Pakistanis.
Other Indians think, Wow, what a great train to get on and try to humiliate the Pakistanis! But this is really a huge pile of nonsense.
There are three camps here: Muslim Leaguers, Nehruvians and Bharatiyas.
The above debate is between the Muslim Leaguers and Nehruvians. Nehruvians are telling the Muslim Leaguers that they were wrong to demand a separate state of Pakistan, and history has proven them wrong, and the Nehruvians were right. But right in what?
Muslim Leaguers believed that in India, Muslims would be subdued by the huge Hindu majority and they will lose all power. Muslim Leaguers could only think like Islamics, that if there is a religious majority they would suppress the minority, garner all levers of power only for itself. Islamics would have done it like that.
Nehruvians were of the opinion that they can ensure that the Hindus would not be able to assert themselves and they can be lulled into accepting a sterilization of Bharatiya identity, civilization and cultural assertion, and they will allow Islam to take over first in the form of secularism and then in a more overt way.
This is what Nehruvians try to tell the Muslim Leaguers, that the latter made a strategic error, which can now be corrected once the Muslim Leaguers understand that there was no need to partition the Indian Subcontinent, and admit that under the guidance of Nehruvian politics, Bharat could have been undermined much more effectively than through the Partition.
Both however agree on one thing - India should purge its Bharatiya Civilization and accept Islam as its reigning ideology. Muslim Leaguers were just not confident that they could pull it off, while Nehruvians were.
Today Nehruvians are telling the Muslim Leaguers, accept our hand, let's join India and Pakistan and by sticking to the "secular" plan, we will be able to do the transformation of India into an Islamic Emirate much more easily even if it takes a little longer.
And in this debate, full-blooded Bharatiyas sometimes jump in thinking this is a triumph of the Bharatiya Civilization that Pakis are cutting themselves up, while Indian Muslims are pampered, so let's rub it in into the Pakis what morons they are. This issue is however not being discussed from the perspective of Bharatiya Civilization triumphing over Paki ideology, but rather Nehruvianian model of Islamization triumphing over the Muslim League model of Islamization.
This whole "Aman ki Asha" project is being sponsored by Nehruvians and a section of the Muslim Leaguers who have seen the light, that in India one gets both - Islam and Feudalism, just as what they had hoped to have in Pakistan, but are now having some trouble considering the radicalization of Pakistan.
What Nehruvians are hoping to achieve is that they want these enlightened Muslim Leaguers to talk to the Kabila - to Pakistani Army and bring them on board. The Pakistani Army however have vested interests in keeping Pakistan united and having control over the land, and they have some difficulty seeing how they can continue with their privileges in some united India-Pakistan union.
The Nehruvians have been told that for such a deal to go through, the Pakistani Army would have to be given a very big bone, where they can show some Islamic victory over the Kufr for them to make some moves on "South Asia", especially as the ultra-radicalized Pakis would consider any move by Pakistani Army to get cozy with the "South Asia" project as highly suspicious.
This the Nehruvians have been trying and trying - to sell Bharatiya jewelry to Pakistan without much outcry from the Bharatiyas. Often the Nehruvians have come quite close and then something or the other came up which thwarted their plans.
Bharatiyas have a big difficulty seeing the party that ostensibly ensured their freedom being willing to sell them off, but that is what "Aman ki Asha" and Track-II Diplomacy is all about - a sell out in order to bring Pakistani Army on board the project of slow managed Islamization of Bharat according to the Nehruvian model and a slow but steady death to the Bharatiya Civilization through the Nehruvian models of civilizational genocide - "secularism", corruption, Macaulayist education, Yuppyism, Hindu infiltration, "ahimsah paramo dharmah", dossiers, itiyaadi.
If people are not convinced that Nehruvianism is simply soft Islamism, then it is a justified skepticism. One could also call it perhaps - aggressive Dhimmiism. I call it aggressive Dhimmiism, because the Dhimmis acting to undermine Bharatiyas feel confident because they have the aggressive support of Islamists behind them, should it come to fisticuffs with Bharatiyas, (which they could avoid altogether simply by being clever enough). There is nothing wrong with skepticism. But this is a model which answers most questions, assuming one is willing to try it, and see the happenings with this lens.
One only has to analyze the actions and propaganda of UPA to see through their mask!
