
Why will the Chinese not flood Maldives or Sri Lanka or Nepal or Greece or EVEN India if they have the money and willingness to travel?
For a guy how was denied visas by the US, at the connivance of several ‘useful idiots’ and pilloried in public, if what you claim is true:Philip wrote: Mr.Modi is truly abominably served by the eunuchs of our MEA establishment , both retired and serving, many who firmly believe that a posse from the White House will come to our rescue for all our problems whether it is Pak, China or microscopic Maldives.
Policy of economic blockade did not worked against nepal and we have an anti India Koli returning to power. Economic blockade will only set the people of malidives against us. Let the Indian navy surround malidives not allowing any other country to interfere there, till we create a regime change, followed by India Maldives friendship treaty in which leasing of a port or land to any third party can be done only after consultation with india.Philip wrote:The slimeballs in Male has forgotten that not so long ago there was a drinking water crisis there and who saved his bacon? India! By sending ships carrying water. Everything in the Maldives barring a few coconuts and fish has to be imported.A naval blockade alone will set off massive shortages , unrest and his own population will throw him to the sharks.The well-heeled firang tourists will fly away and he will be up the creek without a paddle, fit to fry for Friday's feast.
The momeens are cunning and clever. In India, they see an entity that can be milked ad nauseum and without any consequences. They know that the fool Hindus will rush in with aid/whatever whenever required without asking for anything in return.Jits wrote:Policy of economic blockade did not worked against nepal and we have an anti India Koli returning to power. Economic blockade will only set the people of malidives against us. Let the Indian navy surround malidives not allowing any other country to interfere there, till we create a regime change, followed by India Maldives friendship treaty in which leasing of a port or land to any third party can be done only after consultation with india.Philip wrote:The slimeballs in Male has forgotten that not so long ago there was a drinking water crisis there and who saved his bacon? India! By sending ships carrying water. Everything in the Maldives barring a few coconuts and fish has to be imported.A naval blockade alone will set off massive shortages , unrest and his own population will throw him to the sharks.The well-heeled firang tourists will fly away and he will be up the creek without a paddle, fit to fry for Friday's feast.
Folks another update:Philip wrote:SL pressure known.Tightening the vice.Uniform no.1 to quote the Bard,
" is a lean and hungry man, such men are dangerous"!
Maldivian constitution requires the p'ment to endorse the SOE I think after 2 weeks or so. Famous Q."Can the centre hold?" Tadpole is relying hugely on Sino-Pak support to stay on. Situ fluid.
A naval force of at least one modern destroyer, a frigate, an amphibious assault ship and a support tanker entered the Indian Ocean last week. It is believed destined to linger off the scenic scatterings of coral, sand and palm trees.
International affairs analysts believe they’re there to stop India from intervening.
And how would you plan to hide from govt goons after the protest on a island barely about 2 sq miles?ashish raval wrote:Why the f should we bother when the local population is not bothered about their own country or protesting !! Our priority should be how Taiwan, Mongol and Vietnam can have a nbum test in next decade.
That is exactly the end goal. Once chinese marines ofAarvee wrote:Of course they cant. But an amphibious assault ship with a few hundred(?) marines may be enough to secure their atolls of interest or provide security to the incumbent dictator? If they go in as "peace keeping force" may be on invitation, imagine the loss of face for India!
The times were different. We can not securely grow with a string of pearls (SOP) around us. As far as I know, china didnt really have a SOP although Taiwan was defiantly independent right under its nose. I doubt we will be allowed to grow if (or is it when) china gets a firm foot in Maldives and SL.pankajs wrote:Loss of face is more imagined than real ... Taiwan is *core* of *One* China per the Chinese themselves but it has stayed independent.
Is that a loss of face for China? In one sense it can be argued it is!
BUT has it stopped China's rise? Of course not.
Has China's stock increased or decreased across the world in the last 50 years? Can anyone doubt a rising clout of China inspite of Taiwan?
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 ... 0801886314pankajs wrote:Sure sure ... put all kinds of mental shackles on your mind ... and blame China for that, Perfect!
Why is *loss of face* different for China vs India? Taiwan is *core* to China as declared by none other than China itself.
More importantly, How will China and its string of pearls prevent India from *growing*?
Making statement is easy when one does not have to back it up with facts or logic. So then it turns into a *my statement* vs *your statement*. If that is your logic then fine.
See, your first mistake is in comparing Taiwan with India. Compare Taiwan with Maldives. Yameen too could argue is that Mladives too is just trying to survive as an independent nation like Taiwan. Would you agree hat is fair? So lest assume Maldives goes into the Chinese orbit just as Taiwan has been in the US orbit for the past 50+ years under a security pact.Aarvee wrote:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 ... 0801886314
https://southfront.org/chinas-string-of-pearls-project/
http://www.e-ir.info/2015/07/26/string- ... gn-policy/
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-String-of- ... d-security
India is trying to reclaim it's position as a giant, as a strong and stable super power. I dont think that is Taiwan's intention, which is just to survive as an independent nation. Not really similar scenarios. We want to show to ASEAN/SAARC that we can be a stable counter balance but we can not even block cheen from pitching its tent a thousand kms from our main land! I am surprised you think it is okay.
how do you expect a nation to securely grow, when it is surrounded on all sides with spying stations that may double up in future as support stations for espionage activities? what happens when we are hindered by blocks (naval/air) all around, can we stretch our legs? What if we can not enforce blockades at will in Arabian sea/ bay of bengal/melacca straits/IOR ?
Again one must study China. American too went to China for trade but ended enabling China to become the largest trading nation now.Aarvee wrote:Remember how the east india company came? apparently for trade! now cheen wants to do trade via obor.
I am not proposing we all shiver and wet our dhotis. I want solid action that ensures an enemy never gets close.
Never again. Better safe than sorry.