Russian Official: “NATO Prepares Invasion In Syria”
Mihai-Silviu Chirila
Written by Mihai-Silviu Chirila on January 12th 2012
Posted in: Featured, World News
The head of the Russian Security Council on Thursday was quoted by Bloomberg to have said that the NATO countries and some of the Gulf allies are preparing an intervention in Syria after the failure of the Arab League mission to bring the regime in Damascus to end the bloodshed that has been going on for 10 months now.
Nikolai Patrushev, who is also a former director of Russian Federal Security Service, said that Turkey would play a key role in this development, and that along with the United States army is planning to install a no-fly zone over Syria in order to protect the rebels. The no-fly zone would be executed according to a Libya-like scenario, Patrushev said.
The Russian officials have spoken of such plan over the last months, when Dmitry Rogozin, Russian ambassador to NATO, said that an invasion in Syria was imminent, and that it would happen in two weeks (since the moment he spoke about it).
Rogozin pictured this intervention as a means to prepare a larger scale attack on Iran, the archenemy of the Western countries in the region. The fact that Syria continues to have ties with Iran is at the same time a reason to invade it and a reason to stay away from it.
Obama used secret channel to warn Khamenei
By Laura Rozen | The Envoy - 7 hrs ago
The United States has used a secret communications channel to dispatch a diplomatic communication to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning against any threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, the New York Times reports.
The Obama administration employed the back channel "to warn Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that closing the Strait of Hormuz is a 'red line' that would provoke an American response, according to United States government officials," the Times' Pentagon correspondents Elizabeth Bumiller, Thom Shanker and Eric Schmitt wrote Thursday.
The Times' sources would not describe the means of contact.
But analysts tracking military relations between the United States and Iran said they believe that Obama officials are likely using a trusted third-country intermediary to get its message to Khamenei. Such a figure, they speculate, would be a classic diplomatic go-between, carrying communiques from leader to leader.
"It's not a red phone, it's a letter," said Patrick Clawson, deputy director of research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, in an interview with Yahoo News Friday.
Clawson also suggested that the courier in question might be Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who traveled to Iran last week saying he was carrying a message from the West.
"My first suspicion is that Davutoglu was instructed to give to the Supreme Leader" a letter from Obama, he said.
"We have a number of ways to communicate our views to the Iranian government, and we have used those mechanisms regularly on a range of issues over the years," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in answer to a question Friday on the matter at the White House press briefing.
"So we obviously have means of communicating with the Iranian government.," he added. "We use those means and methods and -- but our message privately -- we deliver the same message in private that we deliver in public.
"It's highly desirable to have a line to the national leadership," said Michael Eisenstadt, a military analyst with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, in an interview with Yahoo News.
"How to get to the Supreme Leader, who doesn't give newspaper interviews, and doesn't do a lot of interactions with other government officials, but is the ultimate decision maker, is a question that has bedeviled us since the 1980s," Eistenstadt continued. "How do you make sure you get the message to the guy, and that it won't be diluted?"
"Keep in mind, the administration has sent two prior letters to Khamenei," he continued. "Apparently the channel, if this is the same channel, sounds very much like we have established this channel early on, if it didn't already exist."
Last week, Davutoglu announced in Tehran that Turkey has also offered to host the next round of international Iran nuclear talks,
Yahoo News previously reported that preparations are under way for a probable new round of international Iran nuclear talks to be held in Turkey at the end of the month.
In the wake of Davutoglu's visit to Iran, Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns met with Davutoglu in Turkey this week. And after he'd finished meeting with Burns, Davutoglu immediately huddled with Iran parliament speaker and former Iran nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, a close ally of Khamenei.
And on Thursday, Larijani asserted at an Ankara press conference that Iran is prepared to enter serious nuclear discussions with the West, to be hosted by Turkey.
"I believe all issues can be easily solved through negotiations," Larijani said, the Associated Press reported. "But this time, we want the talks to be serious, it should not be fake."
Asaads goose slowly getting cooked. - close tothe final phase now as I had detailed the process to get defectors began in September.
Intel general defects from Syria to Turkey
ISTANBUL - Hürriyet Daily News
A second high-ranking Syrian commander has defected to Turkey and is helping lead the fight against Damascus, Turkish officials confirm.
A brigadier general in charge of intelligence defected to Turkey from the Syrian military two weeks ago and held a secret meeting with the leaders of the Syrian National Council in Hatay on Jan. 11, the Hürriyet Daily News has learned.
Mostafa Ahmad al-Sheikh, the deputy commander in charge of Syria’s northern army, defected to Turkey two weeks ago and has been staying in the same camp as Col. Riad al-Asaad, the leader of the Free Syrian Army and another defector.
Turkish Foreign Ministry sources have confirmed the al-Sheikh’s defection and the Jan. 11 meeting in the southern province.
The Jan. 11 meeting in Hatay brought together the two high-ranking defectors and council leader Burhan Ghalioun, as well as the body’s executive committee members; Mahmud Osman, who sits on the council, said the body decided to support the Free Syrian Army both financially and morally.
Osman said they had also set up two criteria for the restructuring of the anti-government army. “Priority will be given to the soldiers who defected earlier from the Syrian army. But defecting soldiers’ former ranks in the Syrian army will also be taken into consideration.”
The council and the high-level defectors “extensively discussed the situation on the ground and the organizational capacity of the [anti-government army],” the body said in a statement, according to an Agence France-Presse report.
“The parties agreed to formulate a detailed plan, including the reorganization of [anti-government army] units and brigades and the creation of a format to accommodate within [its] ranks additional officers and soldiers, especially senior military officials, who side with the revolution,” it said.
Formed from deserters from the regular army who mutinied over the regime’s deadly 10-month crackdown on anti-government protests, the Free Syrian Army said it had about 40,000 fighters under its command.
The numbers cannot be independently verified, although Syrian authorities have acknowledged mounting losses at the hands of the rebels in recent months.
“The [council] proposed a plan of action concerning mechanisms and avenues of support to be offered to pro-revolution sectors of the Syrian military,” the group’s statement said. “Additionally, a direct channel of communication between the [council] and [the anti-government army] will be established ... to ensure effective coordination between the two. The [council] intends to establish a liaison office with the [the anti-government army] in order to maintain direct communications around the clock.”
The council initially opposed the use of force against President Bashar al-Assad when an uprising against his rule erupted last March.
NATO radar system in Turkey up, running
ANKARA - Hürriyet Daily News
Despite the strong opposition from Iran, an early warning radar system in Turkey has recently become operational. Hürriyet photo
Despite the strong opposition from Iran, an early warning radar system in Turkey has recently become operational. Hürriyet photo
An early warning radar system deployed in the eastern Anatolian province of Malatya began its surveillance activities Jan. 1, the Hürriyet Daily News has learned from reliable sources. A small number of U.S. troops were deployed to the military base at Kürecik in Malatya in the last week of 2011 since the Turkish military has no qualified personnel to run the U.S. AN/TPY-2 (X-band) early warning radar system. Despite the deployment, the installation is a Turkish base and will be commanded by a Turkish high-ranking officer, the source said.
Turkey joined the NATO-led nuclear defense program only after its conditions were addressed by the alliance. It agreed to the deployment of the early warning radar system on its territory in mid-2011 while the alliance, in turn, agreed to the posting of a high-ranking Turkish general at NATO headquarters in Germany, where intelligence gathered through the radar system will be processed.
Details of the radar system’s functions were discussed during a visit by Gen. Knud Bartels, NATO’s recently appointed military committee chairman, to Chief of General Staff Gen. Necdet Özel on Jan. 9. Iran, which is already in a spat with the United States over its controversial nuclear program, has strongly opposed Turkey’s move to deploy the radar.
“The U.S. radar stationed in Turkey is no good for any Muslim country,” Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Ali Larijani told Turkey late Jan. 12 at a press conference while demanding further information on the matter. “But we have confidence in our Turkish friends.”
‘Radar system defensive’
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu informed top Iranian officials about the system during a visit to Tehran last week. “We made clear that this is a purely defensive [system] against any ballistic threat,” one source said.
Another regional country critical of NATO’s missile defense program is Russia. According to the source, Davutoğlu will pay a visit to Moscow in late January and will inform his counterparts on the details of the radar system deployed in Turkey if the Russian side raises the issue.
In the meantime, Washington said it hoped to reach a deal with Russia by the end of the year for the deployment of a ballistic missile shield in Europe, the State Department’s top arms control official said.
“We will get a missile defense agreement for cooperation with Russia,” Undersecretary of State for Arms Control Ellen Tauscher said Jan. 12, according the Foreign Policy magazine website.
“This is the place where we can begin to put the Cold War and ‘mutually assured destruction’ aside, and move toward ‘mutually assured stability.’”
Russia to be reassured
The U.S. has long wanted to deploy a missile defense system in Eastern Europe it says would be directed at Iran, but Russia has objected, saying such a system would undercut its own nuclear deterrent.
“The only way they are going to be assured [...] the system does not undercut their strategic deterrent is to sit with us in the tent in NATO and see what we are doing. They will only be their own eyes and ears,” Tauscher said.
“Is it a political leap of faith? Yes. Are they ready to do it? No. But we are hoping these strategic stability talks over the next eight months will start to loosen these old ties that have been binding everybody in the old way of thinking,” she said.
President Dmitry Medvedev said in November that Moscow was prepared to deploy short-range Iskander missiles in the Kaliningrad enclave bordering EU members Poland and Lithuania in response to the deployment of a missile shield.