Bharat Rakshak

Raghav K wrote:China's GDP data generates more heat than light

China's keenly awaited growth figures for the fourth quarter of 2008 were as clear as mud to most analysts, who were left struggling to work out what is really happening in the world's third-largest economy.

Experience has taught economists to take Chinese statistics with a pinch—if not a packet—of salt. The quality of the data may have improved in recent years, but it is conventional wisdom among China-watchers that the figures are prone to manipulation by a government intent on promoting stability and, hence, on minimising data volatility

His answer is that officials are juggling the data to set up a relatively firm statistical bounce in the second half of 2009. Other economists, by contrast, were puzzled that the fourth quarter was so strong given weakness in factory output and power generation. The latter fell 7.9% in December from a year earlier, marking the third straight monthly drop.

The problem is that economists have to make do with piecemeal data. China's quarterly GDP report is a supply-based figure. It includes only a real year-on-year growth rate and a nominal yuan level. Unlike in most developed economies, there are no real, expenditure-based figures.

"This means there are no quarter-on-quarter, seasonally adjusted, changes in key GDP inputs, in particular, exports, residential investment, and household consumption, with which to assess the result," Simpfendorfer said.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/241/20090123/1 ... -heat.html

several information for you reference:

1.In china, The leaders of enterprises tends to conceal their revenue for less tax ,when they report their growth to the local governments.

2. In china,the leaders of local governments tend to exaggerate the economy growth ,to get more promotion.

3.CHinese center government want to a real data ,to run chinese economy better.

4.Chinese center government distrust the data provided by local governments either.So CHinse center government sets up Chinese NSA (the National Statistics Adminstration) in charge of the statistic of nationwide economy data.

5. CHinese NSA has direct-controlled branches all over CHina. Its branches are independent on local governments.

Liu wrote: Mandrin indeed is not universial language for time being,but I have confident it will be when chinese economy and trade is powerful enough,just as english did.

I never knew you had so many "Wet" dreams.

Liu wrote: In china, its impossible for CHinese government to censor personal blogs and bbs,because thare are 300 million netizens in china.

Man!! so much brainwashing. No wonder Pakistan and China are buddies.

Raghav K wrote:

Liu wrote: Mandrin indeed is not universial language for time being,but I have confident it will be when chinese economy and trade is powerful enough,just as english did.

I never knew you had so many "Wet" dreams.

let's wait and see.

Liu wrote: In china, its impossible for CHinese government to censor personal blogs and bbs,because thare are 300 million netizens in china.

Man!! so much brainwashing. No wonder Pakistan and China are buddies.

if censorship were reallly as effective as you thought, I could't be exchanging ideas with you at all.

Liu wrote: let's wait and see.

May Allah have mercy.
if censorship were reallly as effective as you thought, I could't be exchanging ideas with you at all.

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth.

Raghav K wrote: let's wait and see.

May Allah have mercy.

if censorship were reallly as effective as you thought, I could't be exchanging ideas with you at all.

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth.

yeah,"50-cent party(五毛党）"......do you really know how the slang of "50-cent party(五毛党）" appeared CHina.....do you know the exact meaning of "50-cent party(五毛党）”？
I can't help laughing....

I have read some funny articles about "50 cent pary(五毛党）" written by western people,such as
"China now pays tens of thousands of commentators for patriotic, pro-Chinese posts (
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/sh ... p?t=149329)"

Every time I read the article, I can't help laughing loudly

How imaginative the writer is!. :

where is my "50 cent'"? why haven't I received check form CHinese government yet?

-----------------------

Do you know why CHinese "boxers" in 1900 killed so many Christians in CHina?

One of the reasons is is that CHinese "boxers" believed the rumors that "all Chrisians have human fresh and bone as dinners"

It seems that now you are on the ways to be the comrade of Chinese "boxers",although now it is 2009,instead of 1900.

^^ Whatever...

This is like the rise of England. England had protestant religion. Those Catholics just don't believe anthing a protestant say.

Here, anything that is good about China is not true because: how can a "communist country" be any good? India is "democratic" and is much better. Why? because India is democratic, how can a democratic country lagging behind a "communist country?"

Liu wrote:Raghav KFirst. Can you provide links that are not in Chinese. To re-educate you, Mandarin is not a universal language.

Second. Everyone knows the media in China is State Controlled. Post your "Carpet ads" from media that is independent and outside your nation.

well, the link is a personal blog.

The writer of the blog visited the town and posted his travel pictures on his personal blog....the writer never expected that his pictures would be seen by indian people,so it can be confirmed that those pictures are not "carpet ads" ready to self-boast.
In china, its impossible for CHinese government to censor personal blogs and bbs,because thare are 300 million netizens in china.
Mandrin indeed is not universial language for time being,but I have confident it will be when chinese economy and trade is powerful enough,just as english did.[/quote]

LIU my friend. I have been to Shenzen, Guanzhou, Fosan, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Xiamen etc . You know very well how the local governments like to maintain the "face" of the city. Typical style is to build great highways, and maintian the area arround the roads. But behind the roads you will see simply brick housing, dirt on the streets, families with grandparents living in 1 bed accomodation, loose wires, etc. What else can you expect when the wages are arround 1000 to 3000 RM? What kind of standard of living can you expect when people are willing to live away from family and work 6-7 days for a meager 7-800 rmb.

I am not a China basher, so I would also like to salute the tremendous efforts and achievements of the Chinease government. They have managed to build world class highways, airports, hotels etc The achevement is fantastic. But at the same time, i see great challenges and ahead. There is a limit to how much growth can come from export, there is also a limit to how much rest of the world will be willing go in defecit. Hence China wil have to change its model. From export

zengerl wrote:Here, anything that is good about China is not true because: how can a "communist country" be any good? India is "democratic" and is much better. Why? because India is democratic, how can a democratic country lagging behind a "communist country?"

No different in reverse. Any negative reinforcement of whatever biases you hold towards India 'must be true'. India must be 'doing badly' because 'it is democratic' and 'full of poverty'. Western articles are used for support - the very sources you then turn around and claim are biased against China. So where does this argument go ?

Rahul M wrote:

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth.

Raghav, can we cut out the personal references plz ?
stick to logic and facts.

Sorry Rahul bhai. Desh bhakt got me over.

zengerl wrote:This is like the rise of England. England had protestant religion. Those Catholics just don't believe anthing a protestant say.

Here, anything that is good about China is not true because: how can a "communist country" be any good? India is "democratic" and is much better. Why? because India is democratic, how can a democratic country lagging behind a "communist country?"

FYI England was the land of Pagans before Christianity came.Also the only "major" disagreement between Catholics and Protestants is the worship of God as Feminine (Parvathi). This has nothing to do with comparing India & China. Another irrelevant post.

I think the entire debate is a waste of time.

The onlee way fwd is to announce at the outset the innate sooperiority of the chinese system simply because the sooperior chinese designed it onlee.

Having done that, I then realized something seemed amiss.

How is that products of the innately superior chinese system waste their expensive time, and even more expensive patience mudwrestling with us unwashed SDRE types from a dirt boor democracy in the first place? Is this the most productive use of soup-e-rear re-sour-cess?

Just wondering onlee.... why this jealous rage at some upstart somewhere dreaming obviously unrealistic scenarios? Why this driven desire to correct the worldviews of obviously un-sooperior folks? Isn't that an inferior trait? How is it that the soup-e-rears behave like inferior beings? And the subterfuge, the refusal to accept even obviously token criticisms of the soup-rear system betrays a paki level insecurity.....

Dear chini bhai-bhais.... kindly spend your time impressing 'em white folks with your shining fotos of chinese wealth. After all, ain;t china competing with USA? Why bother sullying your lily image by comparing it with India's? LOL. Impressing us SDREs hardly buys you any points. And if it does, then you're no different from us SDREs, i.e. how can you be souprear to start with? heh. Think about it.

/Have a nice day.

vsudhir-saar, All the freed up resources from the meltdown of the superpower sweatshops of the pandapokers are being used for PR-Chi onree.

Raghav K wrote:

Liu wrote: May Allah have mercy.
if censorship were reallly as effective as you thought, I could't be exchanging ideas with you at all.

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth.

This reminds me of an old joke about the famous Nixon-khrushchev debate:

Nixon: Mr. General Secreatary, in this country we have something called freedom of speech. Anyone can stand outside the White House and shout "Nixon is an idiot!" and nothing will happen to him.

Khrushchev: Mr. Vice President, we have the same freedom in Soviet Uniion too. Anyone can stand outside the Kremlin and shout "Nixon is an idiot!" and nothing will happen to him either.

skbanner wrote:

Raghav K wrote:

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth.

This reminds me of an old joke about the famous Nixon-khrushchev debate:

Nixon: Mr. General Secreatary, in this country we have something called freedom of speech. Anyone can stand outside the White House and shout "Nixon is an idiot!" and nothing will happen to him.

Khrushchev: Mr. Vice President, we have the same freedom in Soviet Uniion too. Anyone can stand outside the Kremlin and shout "Nixon is an idiot!" and nothing will happen to him either.

another joke:

1. When western people didn't find chinese comment or post on western websites, western people said: " see, we should pretest chinese government ,for their censorship deprive of CHinese freedom of speak and medias".

2.when CHinese people's appeared on western websites and expressed their pointviews, western guys said:" see,those Chinese must be spies hired by CHinese government,because only spied can break though the Chinese government censorship"

3.WHen western guys eventually find that "chinese spies" is just a joke,they said:"see, those chinese are all brainwashed by CCP".

Liu wrote: another joke:

1. When western people didn't find chinese comment or post on western websites, western people said: " see, we should pretest chinese government ,for their censorship deprive of CHinese freedom of speak and medias".

2.when CHinese people's appeared on western websites and expressed their pointviews, western guys said:" see,those Chinese must be spies hired by CHinese government,because only spied can break though the Chinese government censorship"

3.WHen western guys eventually find that "chinese spies" is just a joke,they said:"see, those chinese are all brainwashed by CCP".

Liu,

I'm glad to see there's hope afterall!

At least you have attained the realisation that India (and by extension Indian forums like BRF) are part of the league of democratic nations which is loosely called the West on various Internet forums. League where, despite many shortcomings, freedom and dignity supersedes the need to save the Honour and Dignity of the party in power.

With realisation, hopefully, will come the appreciation that there's more to human life (and values) than shinny roads and and equally shinny (and empty) skyscrapers. And that there's more to human life and dignity than to work in sweatshops which produce cheap goods so that the people in the hated west can live their decadent lifestyle.

Realisation is the first step Liu. Keep at it and you will attain Moksha and start to be able to think independently again. And you should try to attain this goal as you come from a heritage of great thinkers and philosophers who spent more of their time on contemplating the meaning of life and less on trying to defend the indefensible.

Have a good day!

Liu wrote:where is my "50 cent'"? why haven't I received check form CHinese government yet?

Due to economic downturn no pay for patriotic work?

OR

Shallow water fishes are not fed only "deep water" fishes get money?

Liu wrote:Do you know why CHinese "boxers" in 1900 killed so many Christians in CHina?

Becoz they stole their boxer chaddis (underwear)?

Who is the one not thinking independently here? Who is maintaining the view that whoever says anything good about China must not be thinking independently (i.e. brainwashed)?

1. "Democracy" has not much to do with economy, which has been proved by the example of India and China.
2. "Democracy" won't even ensure victory or dominance. Consider Rome v. Greece, and Rome v. Carthage; Greece is the orgin of direct "democracy" even though more than half of their population were slaves; Carthage, though less "democratic" than Greece, was much more "demoratic" than Rome, despite their slaves; and Yet Rome, a "dictator" country, defeated and destroyed both Greece and Carthage. Though the fall of Greece could be attributed to the Peloponnesian war (the war between Sparta and Athen), the destruction of Carthage could, to a great extent, be attributed to their lower efficiency due to their "democracy."
3. "Democracy" comprises many forms, China just has her own form of democracy. China may have "sweatorshop," I just don't see how it is worse than the brutal system of "dalits."

amit wrote:

Liu wrote: another joke:

1. When western people didn't find chinese comment or post on western websites, western people said: " see, we should pretest chinese government ,for their censorship deprive of CHinese freedom of speak and medias".

2.when CHinese people's appeared on western websites and expressed their pointviews, western guys said:" see,those Chinese must be spies hired by CHinese government,because only spied can break though the Chinese government censorship"

3.WHen western guys eventually find that "chinese spies" is just a joke,they said:"see, those chinese are all brainwashed by CCP".

Liu,

I'm glad to see there's hope afterall!

At least you have attained the realisation that India (and by extension Indian forums like BRF) are part of the league of democratic nations which is loosely called the West on various Internet forums. League where, despite many shortcomings, freedom and dignity supersedes the need to save the Honour and Dignity of the party in power.

With realisation, hopefully, will come the appreciation that there's more to human life (and values) than shinny roads and and equally shinny (and empty) skyscrapers. And that there's more to human life and dignity than to work in sweatshops which produce cheap goods so that the people in the hated west can live their decadent lifestyle.

Realisation is the first step Liu. Keep at it and you will attain Moksha and start to be able to think independently again. And you should try to attain this goal as you come from a heritage of great thinkers and philosophers who spent more of their time on contemplating the meaning of life and less on trying to defend the indefensible.

Have a good day!

Liu wrote: 1.My opinion is that China's economy will neither be "U-shaped" nor be " a doubl L-shaped. it is "V-shaped" and the forth quarter in 2008 the is bottom.
Driven by the harsh investment,China's growth in the first quarter of 2009 will rebound.even if the export decreases more.

Liu,

There's a very famous saying (and one of my favourites): If Wishes were Horses then Beggars would Ride...

Your think China is going to have a V-shaped recovery with the last year 4qtr being the bottom????

And you know what? I think I've got a customer for the Three Gorges Dam, who'll give me a good price for it after I show him a picture of the dam over the Internet.

Look boss, get off your high horse and try to produce something relevant or admit that economics is not your forte and get on with life.

According to this Xinhua report in 2007 China share of world exports was 8.8 per cent or US$2.17 trillion (out of the $3.5 trillion or so GDP).

Now assuming that the 8.8 per cent figure is still relevant then the export component of your GDP will be well over US$3 trillion or to use a very rough estimate almost 50 per cent.

Now almost all economic forecasts suggest that the world economy will be in a tailspin untill at least end of 2010 if not longer (remember its being said that this crisis is worse than the Great Depression which got cured only after the second world war broke out).

So all likelihood is that that China's income from exports in dollar terms is going to go down substantially as world export shrinks on account of lack of demand.

Now the question is do you think Chinese domestic demand can absorb the excess capacity that is being formed in China's labour-oriented factories in the Pearl River Delta even as I'm typing this message? (Remember if Wishes were Horses...)

Sorry pal you can wish whatever you want, China will recover only when the world economy will recover and then too, I suspect, that the world economy post this crisis will be a different beast altogether and the era of being the "factory of the world" will be gone. This is not to say Chinese economy will collapse or anything like that. But the era of double digit growth will likely be over.

Oh but by the way, China needs a minimum of 8 per cent growth a year to find jobs for the 7 million or so folks who hit the job market every year.

Please also note that I don't fall in the trap of using the hated Western media sources. I use Chinese sources - so don't come back with Oh all this is bullshit propaganda.

2. Even if there were to be a 2 year period at bottom part of U-curve ,there would not "riots" or "mass-protests" in China as your thought.
In 1989-1991, CHina's economy growth was only 2%-4%, did "riots" or "mass-protests" happen to China?

Sure there'll be no riots, god forbid me I'll never think of such blasphemy!

I was just think of the nice picnics which were held in Tienanmen Square back in the 1980s. I'm sure when there's so many people enjoying a picnic like back then, the glorious Army of the Peoples Republic of China will lend a helping hand by sending a few tanks so that some folks can symbolically stick a few flowers into the tank canons. Afterall the rest of the world needs to be shown what a benign regime is in power in Beijing, right?

All for a good cause of course!

amit wrote:

Liu wrote: another joke:

1. When western people didn't find chinese comment or post on western websites, western people said: " see, we should pretest chinese government ,for their censorship deprive of CHinese freedom of speak and medias".

2.when CHinese people's appeared on western websites and expressed their pointviews, western guys said:" see,those Chinese must be spies hired by CHinese government,because only spied can break though the Chinese government censorship"

3.WHen western guys eventually find that "chinese spies" is just a joke,they said:"see, those chinese are all brainwashed by CCP".

Liu,

I'm glad to see there's hope afterall!

At least you have attained the realisation that India (and by extension Indian forums like BRF) are part of the league of democratic nations which is loosely called the West on various Internet forums. League where, despite many shortcomings, freedom and dignity supersedes the need to save the Honour and Dignity of the party in power.

With realisation, hopefully, will come the appreciation that there's more to human life (and values) than shinny roads and and equally shinny (and empty) skyscrapers. And that there's more to human life and dignity than to work in sweatshops which produce cheap goods so that the people in the hated west can live their decadent lifestyle.

Realisation is the first step Liu. Keep at it and you will attain Moksha and start to be able to think independently again. And you should try to attain this goal as you come from a heritage of great thinkers and philosophers who spent more of their time on contemplating the meaning of life and less on trying to defend the indefensible.

Have a good day!

well, you obviously don't know much about Chinese today,otherwise you won't write so many “preach of democracy"


CHinese today is the most pragmatic people .they are the peopel who are completely immune to "the preach of any ideolgy" such as "democracy" or "totoalism".

To Chinese ,"Marx" and "Rousseau" are all useless rubbishs like "God" and "Anlla".

Chinese people don't care about any Ideology at all.

To chinese :

The cat who can catch mouses is the good cat ,whether the cat is black cat or white cat.
The regime who can bring people prosperity and development is a good regime, wether the regime is communists or democracy.

The next trolling post earns you a ban.

zengerl wrote: 1. "Democracy" has not much to do with economy, which has been proved by the example of India and China.

Aha dear BRFites at last the Panda poker drones have spilled out their and their bosses' insecurity.

Zen bhai democracy has everything to do with the economy. I know you and your bosses get sleepless nights thinking of a country as large as India growing in high single or double digits despite being Democratic.

That will nail the lie that propagated for the past 60 years by the Communist Party of China that you need an authoritarian dictatorship - which has no relation to classical Marxism - for high growth.

Don't worry we all know that all the insecurity and paranoia on display in the past few pages of this thread stems from this fear.

I'm glad that like you colleague Liu you're also well on your way to attaining Moksha. There hope in this world.

2. "Democracy" won't even ensure victory or dominance. Consider Rome v. Greece, and Rome v. Carthage; Greece is the orgin of direct "democracy" even though more than half of their population were slaves; Carthage, though less "democratic" than Greece, was much more "demoratic" than Rome, despite their slaves; and Yet Rome, a "dictator" country, defeated and destroyed both Greece and Carthage. Though the fall of Greece could be attributed to the Peloponnesian war (the war between Sparta and Athen), the destruction of Carthage could, to a great extent, be attributed to their lower efficiency due to their "democracy."

You know your re-writing and interpretation of history is even beyond contempt. But it's only to be expected from a system which re-writes it's own glorious history to justify current excesses.

3. "Democracy" comprises many forms, China just has her own form of democracy. China may have "sweatorshop," I just don't see how it is worse than the brutal system of "dalits."

When Democracy is such an useless concept then why does China needs its own form of democracy? Surely you'd don't need democracy, you have the Chinese Communist Party - what more can one ask for.

I'm glad to see that you've finally brought out the "Dalit" word. There are a few others let me help you out with: Caste system, Opressed Minorities, Backward and barbaric religious rituals etc.

We all love to see Chinese drones make a spectacle of themselves by trying the regurgitate all the things crammed up during class before hitting the Net.


PS: Oh by the way at what point did you colleague Liu send out an SOS so that your bosses could send you to his rescue as he was getting teared to pieces? Must be a new recruit I suppose. Don't worry I think he has potential.

PS:[/b] Oh by the way at what point did you colleague Liu send out an SOS so that your bosses could send you to his rescue as he was getting teared to pieces? Must be a new recruit I suppose. Don't worry I think he has potential.[/quote]


I will stop here on the personal attack, since everyone who oppose you must be brainwashed or works for evil power. Yeah, that is how people in "democracy" debate.

zengerl wrote:Like Indira Gandi did not declare "state of emergency," like US did not have a time of McCarthyism...

I see you're of the same caliber as Liu. Indira Gandhi was voted out of power after declaring emergency.

I didn't see the Chinese Communist Party being voted out after it's Army killed 100s of unarmed and innocent protestors right in the heart of the capital Beijing.

Remember India despite its many faults has never had a situation when the Indian Army has had to open fire on Indians on Rajpath - which is equivalent to Tienanmen Square in Beijing.

Don't even try to do such comparisons.

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/de ... Subgrp1=22

Only bad news report

Liu wrote:The regime who can bring people prosperity and development is a good regime, wether the regime is communists or democracy.

Sigh!! I feel like I'm banging my head against the world.

Liu you just don't get it. Democracy is a way of life and far more important than just a regime. A stable democracy allows for freedom of choice and when you have freedom of choice you get growth, you get nation building, you get harmony and over and above all that you get:
A great nation, which folks look up as a shinning becon of hope.

And more importantly, folks of such a nation don't have to become Internet Warriors and fight battles on Internet forum around the world to defend their country. How many Indians do you see going to Chinese forums to defend India?

That's the biggest difference my friend. The more you and your colleagues shout and make noise, it just re-emphasizes why Democratic India is so much a better choice than Communist China.

amit wrote: According to this Xinhua report in 2007 China share of world exports was 8.8 per cent or US$2.17 trillion (out of the $3.5 trillion or so GDP).

Now assuming that the 8.8 per cent figure is still relevant then the export component of your GDP will be well over US$3 trillion or to use a very rough estimate almost 50 per cent.

obviously you have a wrong idea of GDP.

GDP= C(comsuption）+ I(investment)+G(government order)+[eXport-iMport]
Here "export-import"=trade surpass or trade deficit.

Because of huge trade surpass.China's GDP= C+I+G+trade suprass.
Because of trade deficit, India's GDP=C+I+G- trade deficit.

The "2.17 trillion" you refered is China's total trade ammount( export+import),instead of trade surpass.

China's yearly trade surpass should be about 300 billion USD or so,only about less 10% of its GDP of 4.4 trilllion USD in 2008.

Now almost all economic forecasts suggest that the world economy will be in a tailspin untill at least end of 2010 if not longer (remember its being said that this crisis is worse than the Great Depression which got cured only after the second world war broke out).

So all likelihood is that that China's income from exports in dollar terms is going to go down substantially as world export shrinks on account of lack of demand.

Now the question is do you think Chinese domestic demand can absorb the excess capacity that is being formed in China's labour-oriented factories in the Pearl River Delta even as I'm typing this message? (Remember if Wishes were Horses...)

Sorry pal you can wish whatever you want, China will recover only when the world economy will recover and then too, I suspect, that the world economy post this crisis will be a different beast altogether and the era of being the "factory of the world" will be gone. This is not to say Chinese economy will collapse or anything like that. But the era of double digit growth will likely be over.

Oh but by the way, China needs a minimum of 8 per cent growth a year to find jobs for the 7 million or so folks who hit the job market every year.

Please also note that I don't fall in the trap of using the hated Western media sources. I use Chinese sources - so don't come back with Oh all this is bullshit propaganda.

the first basestone of your idea is wrong,because your understanding of GDP is wrong.

it is (eXport-iMport),instead of (eXport+Import) ,that influences GDP.

Sure there'll be no riots, god forbid me I'll never think of such blasphemy!

I was just think of the nice picnics which were held in Tienanmen Square back in the 1980s. I'm sure when there's so many people enjoying a picnic like back then, the glorious Army of the Peoples Republic of China will lend a helping hand by sending a few tanks so that some folks can symbolically stick a few flowers into the tank canons. Afterall the rest of the world needs to be shown what a benign regime is in power in Beijing, right?

All for a good cause of course!

[/quote]
well.Tiananmen again.

was Tiananmen accident connected with "slow economy growth"?
In fact, it was western economy embargo and block caused by Tiananmen accident that slowed the economy growth.

Please stop baiting each other. Formal warnings will go to both sides if this continues.

I absolutely don't see the point of this democracy vs totalitarian state argument. There's been *zero* development of that debate in the last 6+ years. It does nothing more than start mudslinging, with posters frequently getting personal.

zengerl wrote:"Democracy" won't even ensure victory or dominance.

So in your view forms of governance are to be adopted if they guarantee "dominance" or "victory" over other nations. What about the rule of the people in their own countries? Isn't that what democracy is all about or do you have a new definition of democracy in china?

zengerl wrote:"Democracy" comprises many forms, China just has her own form of democracy.

Another quotable quote. You people do have strange notions about democracy and women. This one was from chairman mao. What great thoughts? CHinese women sure would be happy with mao.
Mao:Chinese Women=Disaster.

Papers reveal Mao's view of women

But during the talks, the Chinese leader [Mao] made a surprising offer to send what he described as an excess of 10 million Chinese women to the US.

He lamented the dismal state of trade between the two countries but remarked that China had an excess of women.

He suggested sending tens of thousands to the US, but later in the conversation increased his offer to 10 million.
..
If they were sent to the US he said, they would flood the country with disaster.

When discussing the possibility of a Soviet invasion of China, Mao complained that too many Chinese women didn't know how to fight.

zengerl wrote:China may have "sweatorshop," I just don't see how it is worse than the brutal system of "dalits."

"Dalits" can take part in politics and weild poltical power. "dalits" have succesfully formed their party and have ruled states in India. they have been elected to post of india's president and other political positions from local body to state assemblies.
And those chinese sweatshop workers cant form their own political parties or even trade unions. They cant even dream of becoming the president of china. Any such dreams will get a infamous re-education club membership. And those tibetan monks in such camps are proof of what happens if you cant have access to political power and why democracy is needed instead of communist dictatorship.

Suraj wrote: Please stop baiting each other. Formal warnings will go to both sides if this continues.

I absolutely don't see the point of this democracy vs totalitarian state argument. There's been *zero* development of that debate in the last 6+ years. It does nothing more than start mudslinging, with posters frequently getting personal.

Suraj,

I agree with you, it's absolutely pointless to get into a pi**ing contest with these Panda pokers.

It's obvious that the whole strategy being followed by Zen and Liu is to start a flame war to ensure that any actual discussion and information on the problems being faced by the Chinese economy on account of a collapse of export demand is not posted/discussed here.

I've been trying to engage Liu with a simple question, with global export demand going down, does the Chinese domestic demand/market have the capacity to absorb the output from the export belt on the Pearl River Delta area.

The only response I've got back is lot's of smoke and noise and very little substance.

I'm retiring from this pi**ing contest.

PS: In a way the special attention being given to BRF and this thread by these Panda Pokers is a sort of left-handed compliment to this forum. They realise that a lot of people view this forum for information that they can trust. And so a desperate attempt to control the information flow in full Chinese Communist style. Pity BRF doesn't have business interests in China like Google, otherwise there would have been far more sophisticated ways of controlling what's posted here.

Very odd; these two seem to be drones from the CCCP, unleashed to devastate an unsuspecting world, with their spotless logic.

If this is the best the internet agents provocateur can do, the world is safe from Red China.

PS Hey I see we came to the same conclusion.

there are machines behind firewalls in PRC that 24x7 scour the net for articles or postings critical of the regime. perhaps syntax or keyword based filtering is the first cut.
then a case gets created and assigned depending on the severity of the 'incident'. their panel consists of support staff ranging between raving mad pshop jihadi types to extremely knowledgeable and well educated univ profs capable of charming arguments.
the case can get reassigned depending on degree of difficulty or as the discussion changes direction. so one guy updates the case history and pulls in more support until resolution.

I have observed this repeated pattern on BRF.

Raghav K wrote:

May Allah have mercy.
if censorship were reallly as effective as you thought, I could't be exchanging ideas with you at all.

The only reason you are "NOT" censored is you are being paid to brainwash BRfites that China is a "Paradise" on earth. [/quote]

China is a Paradise - Paradise Lost!

Ask the peasants!

What is the status of Google?

their agenda is ofcourse to derail threads and if possible get people banned/too tired to argue and go away.

so its best to make the PRC thread a news thread onree and cut the discussions out. then wait for the flies to bite and swat them out

Liu wrote:
The regime who can bring people prosperity and development is a good regime, wether the regime is communists or democracy.

How great is the prosperity in the rural areas and in areas that are not on the coastline?

RayC wrote:

Liu wrote:
The regime who can bring people prosperity and development is a good regime, wether the regime is communists or democracy.

How great is the prosperity in the rural areas and in areas that are not on the coastline?

Ray Sir,

Please don't expect to get a proper response from this gent. See my post a few posts above yours. I asked him a very simple question around 2 pages of this thread ago. Haven't heard a coherent answer and yet there's been a huge host of a Communist version of Pop economic arguments.

He's not even willing to admit that exports constitute a huge percentage of China's GDP number. And you know why? Because he's got no answer to the argument that due to the global economy tanking demand for "China price" goods are down.

No answer to a question? Solution: Just simply erase the question!

Folks I would like to point out something that I find significant. Have a look at this quote from one of the Panda Pokers again:

The regime who can bring people prosperity and development is a good regime, wether the regime is communists or democracy.

Notice the level of sophistication. Whether the regime is Communist or Democracy.

I'm impressed and I'm not joking. IMHO this shows two things:

1) The bosses of these drones have understood the dialectic of arguing their position to a largely Western (please note I use Western here in the sense of folks who come from free-thinking societies and not in terms of racial perspectives) audience, which come to a debate with an open mind and are willing to try and understand the other's viewpoint. The best way to win over these folks is to sound reasonable and practical.

So we have prosperity being touted as what's important and not Communism (the other name of one-party dictatorship in China) or Democracy.

And of course what is left unsaid is that the only country that's progressing very fast is one that is following the Communist dictatorship pattern. People are left to draw their own conclusions.

It's precisely because of this that these ideologues in China are petrified at the 8 per cent or so growth in India. Thinking minds in the West (again note my definition) are already starting the question the basic premise that you need a dictatorship to bring a billion plus people out of poverty within a couple of generations. If India keeps on progression this question will be asked by the Chinese themselves. Needless to say that's a nightmare situation.

2) I think this level of sophistication also shows that the Chinese bosses are totally confident that as of now, they have completely intellectually colonized the average Chinese minds so much so they are confident that they will also agree that a dictatorship in which a cabal controls the whole country is the only way to progress and that the regime does not need the ideological prop of Karl Marx, Lenin and Mao to justify their power.

Just a few random thoughts. Take it for what it's worth.

Yi , yang , xi a nd wai —although they are not etymologically related—are four Chinese words that can be used as nouns and as adjectives, depending of course on the context, to describe things, relationships and events outside the Middle Kingdom (Zhongguo
). In each case, the symptom meaning of the four words, especially of and yang, is easily recognized. And even that factor which transcends the meaning of each of these words becomes apparent.

Yi was originally used only in combination with dong — dong yi ( eastern barbarians4 ), referring to areas or people to the east of Central China ( zhongyuan ) . This is why the term from the very beginning carried with it a negative denotation and connotation. Gradually,
the character yi gained greater universality and came to signify, in addition to the eastern inhabitants, ‘barbarians’ of the periphery in general—in contrast to the peoples of xia a nd hua or huaxia (i.e. the inhabitants of what was to be called the Middle Kingdom later on). The term yi , which thus referred to ‘barbarian’ peoples of the periphery living on ‘Chinese’ soil or that of vassal states, was used since the late Ming and early Qing dynasty not only for additional groups of people surrounding the Middle Kingdom, but also for Europeans and Americans, so as to underline the inferiority of other human beings and cultures (if one was at all willing to recognize that further cultures existed in the world). Thus, both the intension (content of the category) as well as the extension (limits; reach) of the character yi were expanded, forming a specific context and a global reference, and signifying qualities, valuations, etc.

Just a glimpse of the Chinese (Han) mentality!!

And the temerity to speak on Dalits. There are Dalits who are Chief Ministers and Union Ministers, but they were never taken to barbarians as they take the non Han to be!!

CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA

2005 ANNUAL REPORT
III. Monitoring Compliance With Human Rights
III(a) SPECIAL FOCUS FOR 2005: CHINA'S MINORITIES AND GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL ETHNIC AUTONOMY LAW

China's Ethnic Minorities and Minority Policy | Legal Framework For Minority Rights | Self-governance and minority representation | Economic autonomy | Educational autonomy | Religious freedom | Cultural expression | Language policy | Freedom from discrimination | Rights Violations in Xinjiang
FINDINGS

* Minorities that are willing to accept state controls and the official depiction of their ethnic groups and histories have been able to preserve their cultures while joining Party and government ranks. Minorities that demand greater effective autonomy and control over their cultural identities, however, regularly confront government policies that violate the Constitution and the Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law. Government policy in Tibetan areas and in Xinjiang most often contravenes the Chinese Constitution and law. The government grants minorities in southwest China that have accepted central authority, like the Zhuang, Yao, and Yi, more freedom to exercise their lawful rights.
* Since 2000, China's autonomous regions have experienced increased economic output and improved transportation and communication networks, but central control over development policy and financial resources has weakened economic autonomy in minority areas and disproportionately favored Han Chinese in Tibetan, Uighur, and other border areas. Central government investment has expanded educational access for minorities since 1949, though minority literacy rates and levels of educational attainment remain below those of the Han. Government-sponsored Han migration to minority areas has exacerbated ethnic tensions, particularly in Tibetan areas, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia.

China's Ethnic Minorities and Minority Policy

China's ethnic makeup is complex.1 Fifty-five minority groups speak more than 60 languages2 and practice a variety of religions. Though they constitute less than 9 percent of the total population, minorities are spread across almost two-thirds of the Chinese landmass, chiefly along international borders. More than 30 minority groups have ethnic counterparts in neighboring countries,3 and Communist Party policies in minority areas stress loyalty to China. Government concerns over the loyalty of minorities have increased with the growth of popular movements in neighboring Central Asian states.4

Minorities are typically much poorer than members of the Han majority.5 Chinese authorities argue that tensions between the Han and minorities result primarily from uneven levels of economic development. Officials stress that "all minority problems" can be resolved by promoting socialist development and increasing propaganda on the interdependence of the country's nationalities and on the "correct interpretation of ethnic histories."6 Not all minorities support the central government's development approach, contending that economic advancements disproportionately favor Han Chinese.7 Nevertheless, central authorities report marked improvements in social and economic development within the autonomous areas. When the Party assumed power in 1949, less than 20 percent of the minority population had even limited Mandarin language competency, illiteracy rates were high,8 poverty was widespread, and transportation and communication infrastructure was nearly non-existent. Discrepancies in wealth between minorities and Han Chinese have increased since market reforms began in 1978,9 and literacy rates in many minority areas remain far below the national average.10 Central government investment in minority regions has, however, raised overall educational levels,11 improved transportation and communication networks, and trained a corps of minority cadres willing to work in government.

The Chinese Constitution, the 1984 Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law (REAL),12 and a number of related laws and regulations define minority rights. The Constitution entitles minorities to establish autonomous governments in territories where they are concentrated, but like all Chinese citizens, minorities must accept the leadership of the Party,13 "safeguard the security, honor, and interests of the motherland," and place the interests of the state "above anything else."14 The REAL grants autonomous governments the authority to formulate regulations reflecting local minority culture as long as they do not directly contravene central policy.15 The law allows autonomous governments to alter, postpone, or annul national legislation that conflicts with local minority practices, but the next higher level of government must approve such changes and they may not contradict the basic spirit of national policies.16

Implementation of the REAL varies greatly by region and by minority group.17 The Chinese government prohibits all Chinese citizens from expressing sentiments that "incite splittism" or "divide nationality unity," but monitors minorities more closely than Han Chinese.18 The government grants a degree of local autonomy to ethnic groups that accept the central government's authority, but silences those who attempt peacefully to advocate their rights under Chinese law. Mongol activist Hada, for example, is serving a 15 year prison sentence for organizing peaceful demonstrations for rights provided in the REAL. Minorities in the southwest have had more freedom to exercise their autonomy because they rarely challenge central authority.19 The government tightly restricts religious practices and expressions of cultural identity in Xinjiang, Tibetan areas, and Inner Mongolia, however. In contrast to southwestern minorities, the Tibetans, Uighurs, and Mongols live in cohesive communities largely separated from Han Chinese, practice major world religions, have their own written scripts, and have supporters outside of China. Relations between these minorities and Han Chinese have been strained for centuries.

The government continued to violate minority rights in Tibetan areas and Xinjiang throughout the year, but elsewhere Chinese authorities took some steps to improve the treatment of minorities. In May 2005, the State Council announced new Regulations on Implementing the Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law (REAL Implementing Regulations). The Regulations include provisions increasing compensation requirements for central government extraction of natural resources from autonomous regions,20 strengthening the monitoring and reporting mechanisms on REAL implementation,21 and developing guidelines for penalizing government officials who violate minority rights.22 The REAL Implementing Regulations also require local governments to educate minorities about their rights and to draft specific measures to protect their rights and interests.23 A university and several governments in autonomous areas announced new legal aid and social services centers throughout the year.24 In March, a group of Darhad Mongols successfully invoked rights provided in the REAL, United Nations regulations, and the national Land Administration Law to bar the construction of a Han Chinese-owned Genghis Khan theme park on a site overseen by Mongols since 1696.25

Despite these positive steps, the REAL Implementing Regulations also increase the role of the central government in autonomous areas, reflecting a broader national campaign to increase Party controls over society. All of the new State Council measures are binding on autonomous governments, including specific economic development projects, language policies, and migration policies that the autonomous governments previously had the authority to determine themselves.26 Central authorities also tightened controls over minority cultural representation and launched an extensive propaganda campaign on the role of China's minorities in building a united, multi-ethnic nation.27 The same campaign stresses that future prospects for minorities depend on cooperating with the Han majority.

Legal Framework For Minority Rights

Minority rights protected under Chinese law may be roughly divided into seven categories: self-governance and representation, economic autonomy, educational autonomy, religious freedom, cultural expression, language use, and freedom from discrimination. Although the laws themselves contain provisions ensuring central control over minority areas,28 much of the discontent among minorities with central authority stems from uneven and incomplete implementation of the law rather than flaws in the legal framework itself.

Self-governance and minority representation

The Constitution entitles minorities living in concentrated communities to establish autonomous governments,29 though their autonomy remains limited in practice. The 1984 REAL grants autonomous governments all of the powers awarded other local governments and the right to formulate three additional types of regulations: self-governing regulations, separate regulations,30 and separate alterations to national laws. None of these regulations may contradict the "basic principles" of national laws or policies, though the local regulations may adapt national laws, regulations, and policies to suit local minority customs.31 Self-governing regulations establish each autonomous government's organizational structure and local economic, cultural, and public service development plans. Self-governing regulations must be approved by the next higher-level government before final submission to the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC). To date, the NPCSC has not approved any self-governing regulations of the five provincial-level autonomous regions,32 although 133 of the country's 30 autonomous prefectures and 120 autonomous counties have issued local self-governing regulations.33 Most of these self-governing regulations were passed between 1984 and 1992, and a number of their provisions have not kept pace with continuing changes in central government political, economic, and social policies.34

Autonomous governments have passed 383 separate regulations and 68 alterations to national laws, but they are vaguely worded and address only a limited set of state-approved topics.35 Most of these rules lower the legal marriage age for minorities, and only a few give greater fiscal autonomy or control over local natural resources to the local governments.36 Several Chinese scholars argue that autonomous regulations fail to reflect local minority conditions, rendering the concept of regional autonomy "purely cosmetic."37 The inability of autonomous governments to pass effective local regulations, combined with the poor implementation of such regulations and a lack of trained minority legal personnel, undermines the development of the rule of law in minority areas.38

Chinese legal analysts note that minorities would better accept the formal legal system if autonomous regulations accurately reflected minority customs.39 One minority scholar laments that minorities "often simply give up on litigation and handle matters privately, through customary minority practice" because the courts "ignore the existence of minority customs" and lack financial and political independence.40 Autonomous governments in Muslim areas, for example, have yet to pass legislation to legalize Islamic inheritance customs that directly conflict with the National Inheritance Law.41

The Chinese government has passed a number of laws and policies designed to increase minority representation within the government and state-owned enterprises, but minorities remain underrepresented and fill a disproportionate number of low-level positions in the government.42 The REAL requires that the head of each autonomous government be drawn from the titular minority and that state personnel be drawn equitably from local minority groups. The government has funded 13 institutes of higher education to train minority students and mid-level officials, and promotes minorities with "solid political viewpoints" that match state policies.43 But the educational level of minority government employees remains lower than their Han counterparts,44 and minorities are inadequately represented within economic agencies.45 Although minorities are well represented in the National People's Congress,46 the legislature remains subordinate to the Party and individual deputies wield little power.

Chinese law makes no provision for minority representation within the Party apparatus, where minorities constitute only 6.3 percent of the total membership and rarely hold high-level positions.47 In 2000, each of the 125 regional, prefectural, municipal, and county-level Party first secretaries in Xinjiang was Han, as were the first secretaries of all five provincial-level autonomous regions.48 Reflecting the sensitivity of the subject, neither the press nor scholarly journals discuss minority representation in the Party.49 The Party's official atheism, reflected in a rule prohibiting Party members from practicing religion, also undermines minority participation in Party affairs.50

The central government continues to place Han Chinese "from the interior" into key technical and political posts in autonomous areas and to encourage Han laborers and farmers to move into these regions.51 The government contends that this is necessary to "lead" economic development in these areas and combat efforts to undermine ethnic unity by "hostile domestic and foreign forces."52 The policy has undermined minority autonomy and increased ethnic tensions, most dramatically in Xinjiang and Tibetan areas. Central and local directives emphasize that Han leadership is needed to spur development in autonomous areas due to the dearth of educated minorities,53 but the government encourages technically trained minorities to leave the autonomous areas while supporting the influx of both skilled and unskilled Han workers.54 The REAL Implementing Regulations require autonomous governments to "guide and organize" local residents to go to "other areas" in search of jobs and business opportunities.55 By government decree, officials that have been relocated to autonomous areas are better compensated than local administrators. The REAL Implementing Regulations increase the central government's commitment to transferring Han personnel "from all fields and all levels" to minority areas, extending a policy that the State Ethnic Affairs Commission boasts has already sent "tens of thousands of cadres to the border areas since 1982."56

Economic autonomy

Although the economies of the minority regions have grown substantially since 1949, central authorities often determine development strategies with little input from minority residents. Central authorities provide autonomous governments additional funds and financing options beyond those provided non-autonomous governments.57 At the same time, autonomous areas have become increasingly dependent on central subsidies to support their local operating budgets, particularly since the launch of the Great Western Development program in 2000.58 More than 60 percent of Xinjiang's economy is state-owned, for example, and centrally funded infrastructure projects and major natural resource extraction projects since 2000 have increased the central government's share of the Xinjiang economy. Minorities often complain that they are not benefiting from the central economic development programs,59 though such allegations are difficult to confirm given tight controls over reporting on certain types of economic information.

Chinese law grants autonomous regions the right to manage and protect their natural resources,60 but state policies often ignore such provisions. The Chinese Constitution states that all natural resources are owned by "the state, that is, by the whole people," but the REAL grants autonomous governments the right to assign ownership of the pastures and forests within these areas and requires the state to give minorities some compensation for all natural resources extracted from their territories.61 Human rights groups and Western analysts note that central government grasslands policies threaten to destroy the nomadic lifestyle of many Mongols and Tibetans. These analysts also say that the minorities have been denied a voice in grasslands management.62 Increased Han immigration into Xinjiang has increased pressure on scarce water resources and contributed to rapid desertification.63 Many minorities complain privately that Han developers are stripping away their natural resources and that Han Chinese monopolize high paying jobs in resource extraction projects. The REAL Implementing Regulations require that all natural resource extraction projects in autonomous areas benefit local economic development and employment, though it is too early to tell if the Regulations will result in policy changes. The Regulations also mandate new compliance monitoring and reporting mechanisms and impose administrative and criminal penalties on those violating the Regulations,64 which may encourage greater compliance with the Regulations by developers.

Educational autonomy

Although the REAL grants autonomous governments the right to control their educational systems,65 the central government retains tight control over the curricula and promotes the use of Mandarin Chinese in the classroom. Autonomous governments and the central government have developed an array of special schools and programs for minorities, increasing the total number of ethnic students enrolled in classes more than 17-fold since 1949.66 Minorities accounted for only 1.4 percent of the total student population in institutes of higher learning in 1949, but the figure rose to 6 percent by 1999.67 Minorities are allowed to enter universities with lower test scores than Han and are eligible for special scholarships. The government has established special year-long preparatory classes for minorities requiring remedial assistance before they enter universities. More than 9,000 students attended such classes in 2001.68 The government has also set up special mobile classes catering to nomadic minority communities.

Minorities are entitled by law to set their own curricula, but in practice the central government strictly controls the content of teaching materials in minority classes to ensure "the proper understanding of nationality relations and advanced socialist thinking."69 Educators in autonomous areas report that the government controls the content of history textbooks strictly. They complain that textbooks written in the local minority script are translations of the standard Chinese texts.70 One Western study found that minority students have difficulty relating to the material in the standard Chinese curriculum and thus lose interest in learning.71

Religious freedom

The Constitution entitles minorities, like all citizens of China, to freedom of religious belief, though Uighurs and Tibetans have been effectively stripped of this right. Religion is the central marker of ethnic identity for many minorities, and the government often equates the religious activities of these groups with "ethnic chauvinism" and "local splittism." 72 The government represses Uighur and Tibetan religious practices [see Section III(d)¡XFreedom of Religion and Section VI¡XTibet], though official policy concedes that minority religious beliefs are a "long-term issue" and "cannot be forcibly resolved in the short-term."73 Minorities outside of Xinjiang and Tibetan areas who belong to one of the five officially recognized religions are generally allowed to practice their religions in registered religious venues managed by state-licensed clergy. Many minorities practice religions unique to their ethnic groups (and not one of the five state-recognized religions), which the government tacitly allows as a "minority custom" rather than as a religion per se.74 Autonomous governments are required to teach "scientific thinking," a Party catchphrase for atheism, in the public school system and must prevent religion from "infiltrating" the educational system.

Cultural expression

The central government has tightened controls over political expression during the past 12 months throughout the country [see Section III(e)¡XFreedom of Expression], including in minority areas. The government increased already strict controls over how minority cultural traits, histories, and religions are depicted in popular media and schools as well as in academic circles. Officials also tightened controls on cultural expressions about minority relations with Han Chinese and increased propaganda in 2005 highlighting both the achievements of Party minority policy and the official view of minority relations.75 In May, Central Chinese Television broadcasted a series of documentaries on the accomplishments of the regional autonomy system and a feature film set in Tibetan areas and Yunnan depicting "the great melding of nationalities into a single whole, bound by blood and affection."76 Since 1949, the Party has monitored all forms of expression in autonomous areas to assure that minorities accept official Party historiography.77 As recently as 2002, authorities held public book burnings of minority-authored works that conflict with official histories depicting relations among the minorities as harmonious.78 To co-opt the histories of minority groups, the central government has invested in ethnic "cultural enterprise centers" where minorities conduct officially sanctioned research and attend approved cultural festivities and performances.79 The State Council's February 2005 White Paper on Regional Autonomy hails the expansion of minority language publications and broadcasts, artistic troupes, museums, libraries, and histories,80 but also stresses the role of the central government in each of these cultural enterprises.81

Language policy

The REAL entitles minorities to use and develop their own spoken and written languages,82 though in practice language policy varies by region and ethnic group.83 The law says that minorities should use textbooks written in their own languages "whenever possible" and use these languages as the medium of instruction. Though many minorities continued to use their native languages in primary and some middle schools,84 the central government increased its efforts this year to promote universal competency in Mandarin Chinese throughout the country.85 In some minority areas, local groups reported decreased government support for minority language use, but few overt restrictions.86 In Xinjiang the policy appeared more coercive, as discussed later in this section [for more on language policy in Tibetan areas, see Section VI¡XTibet]. Upward social, economic, and political mobility is increasingly dependent upon one's ability to use Mandarin Chinese. Many minority groups welcome the opportunity to develop their Mandarin skills, while emphasizing the importance of promoting their own minority languages.

The Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region government passed a new regulation in May which, if properly implemented, promises to expand the use of the Mongol language. The regulation calls for increased use of Mongolian in regional colleges, economic incentives for students in Mongolian language schools, merit increases for bilingual government workers, and increased Mongolian media broadcasts. It also mandates greater regional funding for minority language publications and broadcasts.87 The regulation contains more specific provisions for promoting the Mongol language and elevating the status of Mongolian speakers than found in national laws or other local regulations.88 The new regulation also contains enforcement clauses, making it more likely to be implemented than earlier official statements supporting minority language use.

Freedom from discrimination

The Chinese Constitution states that all minorities are equal and prohibits all acts that discriminate against or oppress nationalities. Nevertheless, ethnic discrimination continues to exist throughout China, in both the government's controls over cultural and religious expression and in private and governmental hiring practices. Many Han Chinese entrepreneurs with businesses in autonomous areas intentionally recruit Han workers from neighboring provinces rather than work with local minorities.89 Employers favor those with fluent Mandarin language skills and, in some areas, certain job listings bar specific minorities from applying.90 In the Tibetan Autonomous Region, the highest paying jobs are largely staffed by Han Chinese.91 The central and Xinjiang governments announced personnel decisions in 2005 that explicitly favored Han Chinese over minorities. In April 2005, for example, the government specified that 500 of 700 new civil service positions in southern Xinjiang, where over 95 percent of the population is Uighur, would be reserved for Han Chinese.92 The government actively recruited Chinese from outside of Xinjiang to assume key posts in the autonomous region, while providing insufficient incentives to stem the flow since 1979 of more than 200,000 trained personnel from Xinjiang to the east coast.93 Han Chinese now constitute over 40 percent of the population in Xinjiang, compared to less than 6 percent in 1949. In April 2005, 9,000 workers from Han-populated poor counties in Gansu accepted "long-term contracts" to work on Production and Construction Corps farms in Xinjiang, despite high levels of unemployment among minorities living nearby.94

Rights Violations in Xinjiang95

Since the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991 and independent states were established in Central Asia, the Chinese government has tightened controls over Uighur expressions of ethnic identity.96 Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, the Chinese government has equated peaceful expressions of Uighur identity with "subversive terrorist plots."97 The Xinjiang government has increased surveillance and arrests of Uighurs suspected of "harboring separatist sentiments" since popular movements ousted Soviet-era leaders in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan.98 In May 2005, the Xinjiang government intensified its "strike hard" campaign against activities it characterizes as ethnic separatism, religious extremism, or international terrorism.99 In September 2005, Chinese authorities declared the "East Turkestan forces" the primary terrorist threat in China, and acknowledged that Xinjiang authorities have increased police surveillance and political controls throughout the region this year.100

Recent government policies only exacerbate ethnic tensions in Xinjiang. The government's promotion of rapid economic development in the region disproportionately benefits Han Chinese and, together with restrictions on religious, linguistic, and cultural freedoms, and government-supported, large-scale Han migration into the area, has increased Uighur resentment and fears of coercive cultural assimilation.101 Although the extensive security apparatus in Xinjiang102 appears for the present to have crushed Uighur calls for greater autonomy, scholars report that "the majority of Uighurs are unhappy with the system of autonomy and the course of politics."103 One prominent Western scholar notes that "repression on this scale may temporarily succeed in subduing the expression of ethnic identity but in the long-term it can only increase the resentment that Uighurs feel . . . and fuel deeper conflict in the future."104

Many of the rights granted by the REAL are given to autonomous area governments rather than to individual citizens, and the government carefully controls the appointment and training of all Uighur officials. According to one U.S. scholar, "in the estimation of ordinary Uighurs, those Uighurs who have risen to top leadership positions have been selected not for their responsiveness to popular concerns but because of their tractability."105 Uighur officials, like ethnic officials in Tibetan areas, are subject to rigorous political indoctrination. As part of the ongoing national "Advanced Culture" campaign, the Xinjiang government insists that all Party members, who must be atheists, carefully study the "correct relationship between religion and advanced socialist culture."106 A 2004 article in the Party's main theoretical journal reported that Xinjiang is intensifying political education for all government workers, particularly for those with "paralyzed thinking . . . who fail to clearly distinguish between legitimate and illegal religious activities." 107

The government continued its campaign to restrict the use of the Uighur language in favor of Mandarin Chinese, despite provisions in the REAL protecting the right of minorities to use and promote their own languages. Government efforts to limit Uighur language use began in the 1980s, but have intensified since 2001 and throughout the past year.108 In May 2002, the Xinjiang government announced that Xinjiang University would change the medium of its instruction to Mandarin Chinese. A March 2004 directive ordered ethnic minority schools to merge with Chinese-language schools and offer classes in Mandarin.109 Despite a severe shortage of teachers in Xinjiang,110 the government is forcing teachers with inadequate Mandarin Chinese out of the classroom.111 Party Secretary Wang Lequan noted in April 2005 that Xinjiang authorities are "resolutely determined" to promote Mandarin language use, which he found "an extremely serious political issue."112 The government favored Mandarin speakers when setting school admission requirements and in hiring government personnel.113

Uighurs have not been able to determine their own school curricula as provided by the REAL. The government demands that teachers place primary emphasis on political instruction over other subjects.114 Any mention of religion in the public schools is strictly prohibited. Primary and middle schools are barred from offering Arabic language instruction because according to the government "Arabic has never been a language used by any of our minorities and has only been used as a religious language by a small number of people."115 In January 2005, Wang urged the Party to rewrite textbooks and "increase the regulation of classroom instruction, academic forums, seminars, and community activities."116 He emphasized the importance of "politicians managing education and politicians operating schools." Throughout the province, schools became the "battlefront for strengthening the Party." 117 The Yili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture Educational Department criticized teachers for "putting too much emphasis on teaching and not enough on politics."118 In April 2005, Wang announced that more than 1,700 college teachers had completed 20-day training classes on increasing political controls in schools.119

Government controls over expression increased in 2005 as the Xinjiang and central authorities "waged war" against what they called "new plots" to divide the country by those "raising the banner of 'human rights,' 'nationalities,' and 'religion.' "120 A Xinjiang prefectural Party secretary alleged that splittists were using DVDs, popular music, movies, and literature to promote separatism. He also claimed it was necessary to intensify controls over all forms of media and art, increase Party propaganda, use loudspeakers and banners in every village, and remain diligent so that the Party can maintain national unity.121

The government continues to arrest Uighur journalists and authors who write news articles or literary pieces that the government charges "incite separatism" or "disclose state secrets." The Xinjiang authorities define any discussion of "important" ethnic policies as a state secret.122 In February 2005, the Kashgar Intermediate People's Court sentenced Uighur author Nurmemet Yasin to 10 years imprisonment for publishing a short story in the Kashgar Literature Journal allegedly containing allegories "inciting splittism."123 Doctoral candidate Tohti Tunyaz continues to serve an 11 year sentence imposed in 1999 for "revealing state secrets" in Japanese publications on Uighur history.124

The government has sentenced many Uighurs to long prison terms for peacefully expressing discontent with government policies. In August 1999, a Xinjiang court sentenced a group of 18 Uighurs to prison terms of up to 15 years for alleged separatist activities, none of which involved violence.125 The alleged leader of the group, Shirmemhemet Abdurishit, is serving a 15 year sentence.126 Although in March 2005 the government released Uighur businesswoman Rebiya Kadeer several months before the end of her eight year sentence for "leaking state secrets," hundreds of Uighur prisoners of conscience remain in prison.127 Authorities began harassing Kadeer's relatives in Xinjiang after she publicly discussed the plight of the Uighurs from her new home in the United States.128

Notes to Section III(a)—Special Focus for 2005: China's Minorities and Government Implementation of the Regional Autonomy Ethnic Law