Page 17 of 44

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 15 Jan 2012 05:53
by shyamd
Gyanendra embarks on a two-week India visit.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 19 Jan 2012 00:15
by narmad
India green lights military assistance to Nepal
Added At: 2012-01-18 6:37 PM Last Updated At: 2012-01-18 7:18 PM

KATHMANDU:
India has given the nod to resume the assistance during a bilateral talk held between Deputy Prime Minster and Defence Minister Bijaya Kumar Gachhadar and his Indian counterpart AK Antony

Participants of the meeting were Joint Secretary Shankar Prasad Koirala, IGP Rabindra Pratap Shah, Nepali Ambassador to India Khaga Nath Adhikary, AIGP of Nepal Armed Police Dorje Rai, Major General of the Nepal Army Daman Ghale including Deputy Prime Minister from the Nepali side. Likewise, participants from the Indian side were Defence Minister AK Antony, Defence Secretary Shashi Kanta Sharma, Voice of Chief of Army General SK Singh and Indian Ambassador to Nepal Jayanta Prasad.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 20 Jan 2012 23:29
by shyamd
Delhi to resume weapon supply to Kathmandu
Visiting Nepalese home and defence minister BK Gachhedar has formally submitted a list of military hardware to India and conveyed Baburam Bhattarai's government request to resume arms and weapons supplies to Kathmandu. New Delhi on its part has activated the process to supply arms to
Kathmandu barring perhaps Lancer counter-insurgency helicopter.


During his meetings with Indian defence minister AK Antony and top officials, Gachhedar apparently gave a feedback of Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao's whirl-wind trip to Kathmandu last Saturday.

Wen promised $120 million aid to Nepal for police training and border check posts with an eye towards Tibetan refugees.

It is understood that Wen asked Nepal to maintain good relations with India but at the same time asked that Tibetan refugees be handed back to Chinese PLA instead of UN humanitarian bodies like UNHCR in Nepal.

Erstwhile Nepal King Gyanendra had already closed down the Tibetan Bureau office catering to refugees crossing over from Tibet to Kathmandu after he declared emergency in February 1, 2005.

Since then, India has also not supplied lethal weapons to Nepal.

The government sources said while the arms list was handed over to Indian defence ministry on Wednesday by Gachhedar, Kathmandu wants New Delhi to revive the government Ordnance Factory at Sundrijal, 15 kilometers away from the capital.

The Bhattarai government wants Hindustan Aeronautics Limited to repair an advanced light helicopter gifted by New Delhi one-and-a-half-years ago.

Bogged down in the Indian bureaucracy, the ALH is lying in Kathmandu with HAL asking for repair amount.

Given the salience of China in Nepalese calculus, New Delhi wants the grounded chopper to be replaced.

Among other items on the Nepalese list are: mine protected vehicles; ammunition for 81 mm mortar, 5.56 mm INSAS rifle and 7.62 mm rifles.

New Delhi had already geared for deliveries and the arms supplies would be resumed soon.


While Nepal has also asked for the armed Lancer helicopters for its counter-insurgency operations, New Delhi has to take a final call as it does not want Indian platforms to be used against Nepalese people.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 25 Feb 2012 05:44
by krisna
Nepal running on empty as energy crisis deepens
A severe shortage of gas cylinders, essential for heating and cooking in a country with no mains supply, has increased the hardship for Nepalis already enduring seasonal daily powercuts of up to 14 hours.
Exacerbating the problem, a shortage of petrol and diesel means people have to queue for many hours or turn to the black market to run cars and the generators which light their shops when the electricity goes out.
Students have raided gas depots, queues of cars and motorcycles snake back hundreds of metres (yards) from petrol stations, fuel trucks require police escorts and restaurants have reduced menus in an effort to save on gas.
Experts say Nepal's huge mountain river system could be generating up to 83,000 megawatts of power, allowing it to sell surplus electricity to other countries.

But development of infrastructure ground to a halt during the civil war and the nation produces a paltry 688 megawatts a year.

As a result it has to import petroleum products worth 80 billion rupees ($1 billion) a year.
The government-run Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC), which provides subsidised fuel to consumers, has fallen behind on its payments to India and in January the NOC hiked petrol, diesel and gas prices, leading to angry protests.

The demonstrators blocked traffic and shut shops across the country, withdrawing only after Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai pledged to address their demands.

The government has since given the NOC two billion rupees to pay off the Indian Oil Corporation, but the crisis continues unabated.
Blame should not fall on india as it easy for enemies to paint India as the villian. But at the same time India should help Nepal in this crisis.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 25 Feb 2012 12:50
by nvishal
@krisna
The economic and political crisis in nepal is it's own doing. They're trying to play the opportunism game with india and china hoping that it can extract benefits for nepal. Instead, their new policy ended up creating an unstable government and economic uncertainty.

Nepal cannot afford to "play" just like the kashmir and ladakh valley. Kashmir valley played and ended up destroying itself. Ladakh realizes geopolitics better than kashmir valley and hence keeps a low profile. Nepal's new foreign policy resembles that of kashmir valley.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 26 Feb 2012 08:56
by Arav
'Nepal records 28% rise in tourist flow from India’

Flow of tourists to Nepal from India posted 28 per cent growth in 2011 as compared to 2010, an official of Nepal Tourism Board said on Monday.

The tourism sector contributes 4 per cent to Nepal’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Mr Rana said.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 12 Apr 2012 16:48
by A_Gupta
From 2010, but what was this about?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mingthein/4396485246/

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 04 May 2012 11:41
by Roperia

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 19 May 2012 21:04
by Suppiah
There was a news report recently in Singapore's Straits Times on Prachanda and his expensive habits. It appears he wears designer suits, hobnobs with businessmen and has also, like our comrades, developed taste for good scotch..now some in the party want to fight him for his corrupt ways

It appears our intellectual Nandigram rapist goon who has been accumulating frequent flyer miles, teaching Beijing's version of 'pragmatic' communism to his Nepali comrades, has done too great a job. Prachanda is perfectly well versed in emulating his Chinese paymasters.

Of course, the intellectual students at the Stalinist rapist goons' alma mater will still welcome him with "Laal Salaam" , as long as he is obedient to Beijing.

All that remains is for the whole thing to be spun as 'Communism with Nepalese characteristics' perhaps Beijing may consider outsourcing that to our friendly intellectuals Chennai Yellow pages.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 29 May 2012 10:01
by Roperia

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 29 May 2012 15:40
by harbans
^ Nice interview, thanks for posting. This is what our relations with Tibet would be like if it was free. People should see this and think what we miss having a buffer like Tibet. There are no border disputes between Bhutan-India..the question just doesn't arise because both nations share the same millennia old Dharmic traditions. Imagine if China occupies Bhutan, we will be scrambling of fence off the Southern borders, putting up division strengths, with Chinese not accepting what was no issue between Bhutan and India.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 29 May 2012 16:20
by sum
^^ Good point!!! Never thought of it that way..

Dammit, if we only we had somehow managed to keep China off Tibet!

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 May 2012 02:27
by harbans
Sum ji thanks, you also might find a perspective i posted a few days back on similar lines in the Strategic scenario thread here interesting. I have since i started here believed that India cannot Ostrich itself to it's neighborhood environs. It has to influence it. Talk of making borders irrelevant only applies to nations with identical ethical value systems. Canada-US; Belgium-Holland, EU states, India-Nepal, India- Bhutan and so on. We have not really bothered much about conflicting value systems creeping into our neighborhoods.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 May 2012 08:35
by sum
^^ Harbans-ji,
With Nepal now overrun by Maoists and the Nepal side border areas becoming muslim majority slowly( with ISI money being pumped for that), does the India-Nepal dharmic irrelevant border scenario hold?

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 May 2012 20:33
by shyamd
Threat is not new sum ji. Put it this way, security guys are confident that gaps have been plugged. This border was a major concern a few years back.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 May 2012 20:54
by harbans
With Nepal now overrun by Maoists and the Nepal side border areas becoming muslim majority slowly( with ISI money being pumped for that), does the India-Nepal dharmic irrelevant border scenario hold?
With UP politics becoming extremely appeasement oriented, growth rates dipping, Madrassa's and Mosques looming everywhere, it is difficult Nepal will not be affected. With China making massive political inroads into Nepal, it is obvious that the original equation India-Bhutan, India-Tibet is waning. Maybe 40 years more it will resemble what i posted on 23/5 in the Strat scenario. If India understands the problem in the first place and addresses it we may have a chance. If not we will lose out.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 May 2012 21:01
by Agnimitra
shyamd wrote:Threat is not new sum ji. Put it this way, security guys are confident that gaps have been plugged. This border was a major concern a few years back.
shyamd ji, "plugging" the newly infested border areas is not a win, it is a retreat. Earlier the border was free, Nepal was considered a civilizationally friendly area. Today the border areas are being re-settled, and the political centers there are being taken over by anti-national forces. By retreating and plugging the border for the time being, we achieve nothing and acknowledge the loss and relinquishment of the territory on the other side of the border to anti-India forces.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 31 May 2012 02:17
by shyamd
ISI always had the ability to use Nepal even before the maoists gained power but we had good cooperation to limit it to a great extent. We have a good understanding with the current Nepal govt and they continue to cooperate with us in some ways enhanced than before. We have a good level of comfort here.

Open borders always have a threat of cross border crime/anti national elements slipping through and it was bound to eventually catch up to us one way or another. What is better is to have IRIS scans and only allow Nepali's to enter visa free with a biometric passport - and introduce some measures which they are doing by increasing checkposts and integrated systems. Some sort of US Canada arrangement.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 31 May 2012 03:51
by harbans
Shyamde ji, i think you are just not getting it. ISI may not be as deadly enough with it's Islamist interpretation of things. Maybe the Dharmic one is more. The more Psec one is coupled with the more ground the Dharmic loses, the counter the Dharmic will ultimately come out with is an unknown factor. If it does not, then the theory i posted on 23/5 on the strat scenario forum will be true. No two ways about it. The middle path you seem espousing is an intermediary to keep things under the cooler. It won't in the end work out the way you want. A doctrine has to win. Islamist/ Han imperialist/.. or the Dharmic/ Pluralist. The present Indian ones prevalent in UP/ WB won't work. We have to realize that at some stage. We are losing simply because most of us don't realize the dangers in the doctrines gaining strength that are in the neighborhood. The ally of our most inimical neighbor is now understanding the treachery and deceit that it does because it is in the neighborhood of Pakistan. We know it. We have to counter the doctrine both Han imperialist and Islamist. Make them ultimately show what they really are: Utter nonsense.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2012 02:10
by shyamd
Situation is quite complicated. The Nepali's, Bhutanese are afraid after what happened to Tibet - Han imperialism wont work and their outter core is just about hanging together. We could hear more news on that soon.

Imo - If India is sick of PSecularism - they'll demonstrate it via votes, we have this outlet to let go of anger.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2012 03:47
by Mahendra
This vote out argument isnt quite valid, in India most of the votes are cast on caste/ community/ religion/region lines, true there are exceptions but this is more or less the norm. If we were a true fool- proof democracy then goondas, fixers, pimps, dacoits, rapists and terrorists would not get elected to parliament.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 20 Jun 2012 23:40
by RamaY
Amid crisis, largest Nepal political party splits

Good development. Hopefully will pave the way for setting up a stable govt and new constitution after November polls. It will also reduce the Maoist force to ~1/3rd.
Hard-core leftists broke away from Nepal’s biggest political party and announced a new faction Tuesday in a split that further complicates the country’s messy political crisis.

Nepal has been without a legally sanctioned government since late May when its Constituent Assembly expired without agreeing on a new constitution for the post-monarchy era, although Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai has continued on, as caretaker, and called new elections for November.

Leftists within Bhattarai’s party — which is Nepal’s biggest and which represents former Maoist rebels — have grown increasingly frustrated with the top leadership, saying it has failed to secure favorable positions for former Maoist fighters or undertake promised land reform.So much for the revolution

Mohan Baidya, who led the breakaway group and took about a third of the party’s central committee members with him, said that Bhattarai and party Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dalal were driving the party in the “wrong direction.’’

“They were concentrating more on staying in power than following party ideologies,’’ Baidya said. “Our new party will adopt a pro-revolutionary political course.’’

The new party will be called Nepal Communist Party - Maoist.

Dina Nath Sharma, education minister in Bhattarai’s government and senior member of his Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) party, said the split was unfortunate.

“This will only lead to further trouble for both the Maoist party and the splinter group. It will not benefit either of us,’’ Sharma said.

The Maoist rebels had fought government troops between 1996 and 2006 until they joined a peace process and contested elections two years later after the country’s constitutional monarchy was abolished.

The Maoist group emerged as the largest party in the 2008 polls, gaining about 38 percent of the seats in the Constituent Assembly, but it has struggled to effectively govern in a coalition amid Nepal’s notoriously querulous politics.

The country’s Constituent Assembly expired last month after failing to write a new constitution despite repeated extensions of the body’s self-imposed deadline, leaving the country in a political limbo. Analysts said the split among the Maoists would make the situation deteriorate further.

“This will only lead to further political instability, said Yagya Prasad Adhikari, a political science professor at the Tribhuwan University in Katmandu.

Adhikari warned that the split could even lead to violence between the factions.

Some of the conflict arises from a November agreement that Maoist leaders signed on the integration of their former fighters into the national army.

The splinter faction says the fighters were given low ranks and that the party leadership failed to secure them a better deal. It also accuses party leaders of failing to make any effort to launch promised land reforms to redistribute land from the rich to landless farmers.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 23 Jun 2012 22:18
by Roperia

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 27 Jun 2012 00:46
by Roperia

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 20 Jul 2012 07:49
by abhishek_sharma

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 10:15
by member_23660
BIPPA should be corrected as it is not in national interest: Narayan Kaji

Revealing the internal differences within the UCPN (Maoist) over the Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement (BIPPA) signed with India during last year, party's vice chairman and Deputy Prime Minister Narayan Kaji Shrestha Monday said that the agreement should be "corrected" as it is not in national interest.

"The Prime Minister signed BIPPA without consulting the party and others. It should be corrected," Shrestha, who is also the foreign minister, said, claiming that he had opposed the proposal for the agreement even during the talks with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi. Describing BIPPA as a wrong step for national independence, Shrestha said he had serious differences with Prime Minister Bhattarai on the issue of national independence. Shrestha, who had not spoken anything publicly against the agreement when it was signed in October last year during Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai's India visit, also said the party's viewpoint on India has remained same even and after the recently held 7th extended central plenum.
Describing the newly elected Indian President Pranab Mukherjee as a "Nepal expert", Shrestha also said Nepal-India relations need to be nurtured "positively". nepalnews.com


http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2012/j ... news10.php

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 25 Jul 2012 03:02
by brihaspati
Why do people give the "vote out" argument when faced with the p-secism, etc, questions?!! Voting in India, for most places, translates into serious consequences for the daily lives of ordinary folks who do not have key positions in clamouring for more financial investments from the Gulf or have the inner ear of top-cats who secretly work 24/7 to bring security for Indians.

For the vast majority of populations, in their spread out rural or semi urban sprawls, its the local politico-biz-criminal nexus ably supported by the uniformed above-the-cut Raj-legacy coercive forces - that determines whether, the voting was "correct" or not. If the voting was "incorrect", then it may determine whether they live the next week, or retain their meagre incomes in the next months, or something does not happen to their wives or daughters.

We forget that most parts of teh subcontinent have followed over lock-stock-barrel from the feudal days under the Brits - witha continuity in the power structure of the rural "bad-gentry", the political-biz-mafia goondas at each and every level - from the village to the city and the capital. They may have changed colours, into even reds, but everywhere the basic modus operandi is the same. The new goonda could have had a degree from an engineering college, or an MBA, or a MBBS, but its their networks which determine the livelihood of people who vote.

What, forces the people to vote under this fear of repercussions - perfectly legal repercussions in that - is that they have been deprived of the physical means of resistance, unde r the Brits and continued after independence. The state monopolizes all the rights to violence, and the supreme arroganc eof the regional state forces tasked with maintaining law and order amply takes the pseudo-raj pleasure out on the people and solidly appear to help maintain the status quo of politico-biz-mafia power.

Nepal was a classic example of this model within the subcontinent. Just because there was a formal royal family at the top, all the focus of the anger could be channelized on the family. But the people could do something about it - even if they did not and not yet fully realize that they have simply helped in an intra-elite factional fight - because they bypassed the "vote out" route first.

Let us keep the reality of power - as expressed in socio-economic subservience of the "voters" on those whom they are supposed to "vote out" - in mind before ask for "voting out" as proof of popular resentment. It adds insult to injury.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 Jul 2012 11:43
by member_23660
Indian leader in town (Kathmandu)

Image
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2012/j ... news06.php

Nepal-Bangladesh trade talks kicks off
The fourth Nepal-Bangladesh secretary-level talks on trade relations kicked off here in the capital on Sunday. The meeting is led by Secretary at the Ministry of Commerce and Supplies Lalmani Joshi from Nepal while Bangladeshi Commerce Secretary Mohammad Gulam Hussein is leading from Bangladesh side.The two-day long meeting began with an aim to discuss on bilateral trade expansion and facilitation along with the possibility of permitting the trade of some goods without customs tax in the markets of both countries.
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2012/j ... news05.php

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 30 Jul 2012 11:50
by member_23660
India intervened in Katawal case: Sharan

NEW DELHI, JUL 28 - Former Indian Ambassador to Nepal Shyam Sharan has said that it was India that actually intervened in Nepal to prevent erstwhile Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal from sacking then Army Chief Rookmangud Katawal in 2009.Sharan, one of the key interlocutors during the 12-point agreement between the Maoists and the seven-party alliance, was speaking at an interaction during the launch of the book “Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace’’ in New Delhi on Friday. “I wouldn’t say that India has no influence in Nepal but such influence should be used in a proactive manner and that was what we did in 2005 during the 12-point understanding,” Sharan said. “And in the case of army chief [Katawal]’s dismissal, we intervened to prevent that from happening. India did not want Nepal Army’s professional integrity invaded.” This is perhaps the first time ever that a high-level Indian official has spoken publicly about New Delhi’s intervention in the Katawal saga.

He, however, said that it is best for India to step aside to let the internal dynamics sort out the domestic problems.

“If stability is ensured in Nepal, it will be the only country in South Asia that has potential to prosper on its own with its huge resources,” Sharan added. “And India’s interest is to nudge Nepal towards realising its potential for development.”

One of the contributors of the book Professor SD Muni said that India supported the 12-point understanding reached between the political forces in Nepal for strategic reasons and fear of internal Maoist problems, among others. The book, which includes contributions from more than a dozen Nepalis and non-Nepali writers, is edited by Sebastian von Einsiedel, David M Malone and Suman Pradhan.

http://www.kantipuronline.com/2012/07/2 ... 57832.html

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 31 Jul 2012 13:45
by member_23660
Indian leader Sinha meets PM Bhattarai
Image

http://www.kantipuronline.com/2012/07/3 ... 58014.html

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 20:12
by member_23660
Professor Dr SD Muni paper, it is in Nepali.

http://www.himalkhabar.com/?p=5402

Image
Interesting hug....

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 20:43
by member_23660
India sponsored terrorism in Nepal?

Sanghu vernacular weekly has revealed that the connection of the incumbent Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai and Unified CPN (Maoist) chairman Prachanda with the Indian intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) was established since the insurgency years.
Image
Image
The two leaders had signed an agreement at the Indian Prime Minister’s office in June 2002 pledging not to carry out any acts harmful to Indian interests. Then the Maoists were tagged terrorists by India and the international community. Still the Indian government granted permission to the putative terrorists to sign this agreement. The implication is not without the suggestion that the Indian government in spite of its ability to end the bloodshed or somehow constrain it, remained apathetic, and rather it was implicitly involved in fomenting violence in Nepal.

The fact was deliberately revealed in an article of India’s Nepal-specialist Prof. S.D Muni in a book recently published in America ‘Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace’. Muni’s article ‘Bringing down the Maoists from the hills: India’s role’ packages the surreptitious fact that the two Maoist leaders, spearheading an insurgency against established authorities in Nepal, consented to reach a pact with Indian authorities in India’s interest. The fact also refers to the decade long stealthily carried out communication between the Maoist leaders and the RAW agents. The relation between the Maoists’ leaders and RAW was made more consistent in the days that followed the pact according to Muni. The duo also held discussions with a team of Investigation Bureau.

The main leaders of the bloody insurgency in the country that was initiated for an absolute communist rule, ended with a staggering loss of lives and property, but betraying the cause and the leaders shaking hands with some capitalist patrons in South Asia. The leaders of the dissident faction of the Maoists headed by Mohan Vaidya, have been accusing Baburam and Prachanda of working as Indian agents. After a protracted struggle inside the party, the Vaidya faction finally split and formed a new party with many influential leaders within its ranks. The putative agents today are suggested as having connection with RAW agents which is implicated by the breaking away of the hard line revolutionary faction of the Maoists. The denial by Chinese premier Wen Jiabao to grant a meeting to PM Bhattarai at Rio De Jenario conference is another evidence of this fact. The circumstantial evidences and the direct revelation by India’s Nepal specialist SD Muni cannot be discounted. However, the manner in which it was revealed, in being a deliberate act, could further obscure the view and roil the sands.

In any case, it becomes sure that India had sponsored terrorism in Nepal as India had declared the Nepali Maoists as terrorist and in the meantime, she was sponsoring Bhattarai and Prachanda.
Why PM Bhattarai was denied meeting by Chinese PM at Rio De Jenerio conference?:
According to a report, a Chinese team under the leadership of Chinese Communist Party’s Foreign Department Director, I Ping, has hinted that Prachanda and Baburam could be put in China’s black list.
The passionate support of the two leaders in support of ethnic federalism in the country is, according to Ping, not only detrimental to Nepal’s existence but a threat to Chinese security as well. The two leaders’ act implies their unwillingness to serve in the interest of Chinese integrity, rather they are serving the interests of elements that are financing the cause of ethnic federalism as well as Free Tibet movement in China, it is considered. The Chinese have come across vital information that the elements backing the idea of ethnic federalism are the same people that want to create an armed front to be used for unrest in Tibet and other places of China. As China is the last remaining part of the Communist Bloc that once was half the world, it is wary of any incidents that may be reminiscent of Soviet Union’s disintegration. China is more than willing to assert itself and sustain its dominance in Asia. It is cautious and not without the knowledge of PM Bhattarai and Maoist chairman Prachanda’s sustained contacts with RAW.
http://www.peoplesreview.com.np/index.p ... &Itemid=54

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 13 Aug 2012 10:55
by member_23660
China to increase aid to Nepal
Visiting Chinese vice foreign minister Fu Ying, who arrived in Kathmandu on Saturday morning, held consultation with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs Narayan Kaji Shrestha the same day.
Nepal-China bilateral relationship, Chinese support to Nepal's development, among other issues featured prominently during the meeting. During the meeting, she also hailed Nepal's stand on "One-China policy" and said that China wants to further consolidate its ties with Nepal by increasing its aid to the new Himalayan republic in the days to come. Fu arrived in Kathmandu from Bhutan, heading a 7-member Chinese delegation, on Saturday to attend the 9th Nepal-China Mechanism consultative meet starting from Monday. Fu is the most senior Chinese official to visit Nepal after premier Wen Jiaboa's visit to Kathmandu in January. During her stay here, she will meet top leaders of major parties including Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai.The Nepal-China consultative meet will dwell on key issues of mutual interest including trade, Chinese investment in Nepal, border security and tourism. It will also review the implementation status of bilateral agreements specially those signed during Chinese premier Wen´s Nepal visit.
nepalnews.com

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 13 Aug 2012 16:47
by SSridhar
Bhutan seeks China's help for UN High Table Seat
Bhutan has sought China's support for a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council for the term 2013-14. This was revealed by the Bhutanese government after its leaders held border talks with a visiting Chinese delegation in Thimphu on Friday.

"The talks were held in a warm and friendly atmosphere," the Bhutanese foreign ministry said in a statement. "It will provide the opportunity for the two nations to better understand each other's positions, which will facilitate an early and just settlement of the boundary issues."

The meeting discussed Bhutan's aspiration to serve as a non-permanent member of UNSC, elections for which are scheduled for October this year, said Bhutan's leading English daily, Kuensel.

An eight-member Chinese delegation led by vice foreign minister Fu Ying participated in the border talks just six weeks after the two countries established diplomatic ties for the first time. China is expected to bargain hard before helping Bhutan achieve its international ambitions in the form of a non-permanent seat at UNSC. Beijing might ask Thimphu to reduce its dependence on India, and discourage any future visit by the Dalai Lama to the country.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 09 Feb 2013 08:47
by SSridhar
India keen on strengthening ties with Bhutan - The Hindu
India was keen on strengthening, expanding and reinforcing the canvas of economic cooperation and bilateral engagement with Bhutan, said President Pranab Mukherjee on Friday while receiving Jigmi Y. Thinley, Prime Minister of Bhutan, at Rashtrapati Bhavan here.

The President said India was always sensitive to Bhutanese wishes and aspirations and hoped that Bhutan would also reciprocate. Expressing satisfaction at the “excellent state” of bilateral relations marked by extensive, multi-faceted, mutually beneficial cooperation, Mr. Mukherjee complimented the government and the people of Bhutan for the democratic transition and consolidation of democratic values and institutions since 2008.

Mr. Thinley described India as its most important partner. Bhutan’s peace, stability, prosperity and happiness all depended on how it maintained its special relationship with India, he said, adding Bhutan’s future was intertwined with that of India.

He said Bhutan desired to strengthen and deepen relations with India and his mission to India was to express the gratitude of the Bhutanese people for the substantial support rendered by India for its development, for the democratic process and for the high importance attached by India to bilateral relations with Bhutan.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 09 Feb 2013 16:07
by shyamd
Cash, not China, tops Thinley’s agenda
Sandeep Dikshit
Share · Comment · print · T+
Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai calling on Bhutan Prime Minister Jigmi Y. Thinley in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: R.V. Moorthy

With elections nearing, Bhutan doesn’t want India to slow down its assistance

Cash, rather than China, tops the agenda of Bhutan Prime Minister Jigmi Y. Thinley, who arrived here on a three-day visit. With elections due in Bhutan towards the middle of this year, Thimphu is keen that its development plans and hydel projects being constructed by India are not affected by the Finance Ministry’s move to reduce fiscal deficit, said government sources.

Mr. Thinley was a surprise winner in Bhutan’s maiden parliamentary polls and his group is keen to repeat the performance in the next elections as well. Showcasing ongoing road, hydel and other development projects and ensuring they are not affected are said to be one of the keys to his party repeating the showing when elections are held in June this year.

Mr. Thinley’s focus on economic ties with India is not surprising. During its years of good economic growth, India contributed generously to Bhutan’s Tenth Plan as well as maintained the flow of funds for three ongoing mega hydel projects — the 1,200-mw Punatsangchhu-I, the 1,020-mw Punatsangchhu and the 720-mw Mangdechhu.

This smooth flow of funds now appears to be in danger of being curtailed after Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram indicated his intention to take a closer look at the allocation for Bhutan as part of his overall drive to compress allocation of budgetary resources to most Ministries including the Ministry for External Affairs which channels India’s external assistance.

Mr. Thinley is also keen to know the status of seven other major hydel projects that have a generation potential of over 7,000 MW. The clearance schedule of all these projects has been pushed back by four to six months amid apprehensions that some of them involving central public sector enterprises may get further delayed.

As for China, sources close to Thimphu said the top leadership, including King Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuk, are kept acquainted about the situation on his country’s borders by India’s Research & Analysis Wing. So far, Beijing’s activities have not been an area of concern though middle ranking Chinese officials have visited Bhutan to test the waters on the prospect of establishing diplomatic ties.

Bhutanese sources also refer to the general aversion to the Chinese among middle level officials as one reason why the opening up towards China will not take place soon. During 10 years between the mid 60s to the mid 70s, when many of the officials were in their formative years, they were witness to the pitiful state of Tibetan refugees as they sought shelter in their villages along the route to India.

These memories still live with them and frequent reports of Tibetan monks immolating themselves has led them so far to politely stall China’s probes for a diplomatic presence in Bhutan. The dispute with China over what some Bhutanese regard as traditional grazing pastures for their cattle around the Sikkim-Bhutan-China tri-junction also dissuades them from getting too close to China.

Basically at the back of Mr. Thinley’s mind is the nervousness every politician suffers from before an election. Between now and June, when the elections are likely to be held, they don’t want a slowdown in Indian assistance for Bhutan’s budget or the hydel projects to become a factor, said official sources here.

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 26 Mar 2013 21:05
by rajrang
23 countries are conducting military exercises in Nepal including India and the US. Glaring omission is China and Pakistan! Seems like the US is bolstering India's relative influence in Nepal while countering growing Chinese's influence in Nepal. The US did the same in Myanmar in recent years. India should "outsource" countering China's influence in Sri Lanka, Banglades, Maldives, Bhutan, the Indian Ocean and even Pakistan to the US. The US influence in these countries is in my opinion relatively much, much more benign and India-friendly then the Chinese one. All India has to do is to sit on the US's side of the fence and keep shut, thus, providing diplomatic and immense moral support to the US. This in turn will help the US in influencing other 3rd world countries.

I am assuming the Indian leaders appreciate that the US (together with its vast number of alies and friends) are on the same "team" as India in the looming potential confrontation between China and the rest of the world.

http://article.wn.com/view/2013/03/17/N ... lated_news

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 28 Mar 2013 08:13
by member_19686
Nepal's First-Ever Census Reveals Good News for Christians
Number of Catholics and Protestants in Himalayan nation has tripled since 2007.
Melissa Steffan

Christians now comprise 1.4 percent of Nepal's population of 26 million, according to the Himalayan nation's first-ever census.

The results show that more than 80 percent of Nepali citizens identify as Hindu. Nepali Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai, who unveiled the census results, stated that "minority religions will enjoy equal status."

However, the reported 1 percent growth rate may not be entirely accurate, Asia News reports.

"We believe our population is more than the report claims," Protestant leader CB Gahatraj told Asia News. "The problem is that during the census period, many newly converted Christians were afraid to tell their religion, and so were registered as Hindu."

Nepal became a secular state in 2007, at which time Catholics and Protestants accounted for just 0.4 percent of the population. Growth throughout the last five years has occurred in spite of anti-conversion laws, although an agreement signed in May promised to protect the rights of the Christian community.

CT's past coverage of Nepal includes the end of its Hindu monarchy in 2007, as well as Christians' new role as peacemakers after the country's national crisis. Most recently, Christians demanded more burial ground in a nation where cremation is the norm.

http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliv ... tians.html

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 13 May 2013 10:01
by member_23660
If RAW is blackmailing the Maoists, all Nepali political forces should rescue them

http://kantipuronline.com/2013/05/13/in ... 71563.html

Re: Nepal and Bhutan News and discussion

Posted: 13 May 2013 10:05
by member_23660
Pak national arrested in Nepal with 1 cr fake Indian currency
http://www.thehindu.com/news/internatio ... 695449.ece