India-Myanmar news and discussion

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by ricky_v »

https://warontherocks.com/2023/11/the-m ... sand-cuts/
While the fog of war demands analytical caution, Operation 1027 carries important implications for the future of Myanmar. First, the Myanmar military is increasingly overstretched despite its airpower and artillery advantages. Second, the Three Brotherhood Alliance potentially aligning itself more openly with the pro-democracy movement — at least militarily — highlights the resistance’s determination and coalition-building efforts. Third, China’s turn toward the junta has proven a poor bet.
the Myanmar military has fought an expanding coalition of longstanding ethnic armed organizations, the pro-democracy parallel National Unity Government, and a variety of People’s Defense Forces. Facing a fluid and complex battlefield situation, the Myanmar military junta has largely held onto the cities and towns while suffering substantial losses to guerrilla fighters operating in rural areas.

Deeply unpopular, brutal to civilians, and performing poorly at the tactical level, the Myanmar military relies upon airpower and heavy artillery to prevent the resistance from taking and consolidating its hold over populated areas. For example, the Karen National Union and several local People’s Defense Forces units launched an offensive in October 2022 to take Kawkareik near the Thai border. Initially successful, the military pulled back before junta forces retaliated with airstrikes and heavy artillery, ultimately dispersing resistance units into the countryside.
However, Operation 1027 represents perhaps the most significant battlefield victory thus far in the renewed civil war. Taking the town of Hsenwi in particular cuts the primary road to China through the border at Chinshwehaw, which the Three Brotherhood Alliance also captured. Almost $300 million in trade passed through it from April to July 2023, according to a junta mouthpiece. Resistance forces are now attempting to surround other strategic towns such as Laukkai and Nawngkhio and seize other locations along the border On a strategic level, the loss of these routes cuts off the junta from one of the larger border crossings to its most important international backer, Beijing. Spurred by the Three Brotherhood Alliance’s success in Shan State, People’s Defense Forces units assaulted and seized Kawlin, a district-level town in Sagaing Region in a first for them, as well as Khampat near the Indian border. Fighting this past week in Chin, Kayah, and Rakhine States further herald that the junta is increasingly tottering.



as an aside
https://myanmar-now.org/en/news/myanmar ... an-border/
Anti-regime armed groups have seized control of Khampat, a town in western Sagaing Region located near the border with India, according to Myanmar’s civilian National Unity Government (NUG).
Image

back to regular programming
Importantly, this is becoming increasingly difficult. Junta convoys and supply lines are increasingly subject to ambushes. Its sudden loss of control of outposts throughout Shan State exposes the critical weakness inherent to the military’s overstretch: The military redeployed 3,000 troops out of Shan State to other parts of Myanmar earlier this year. It appears unlikely that they have the reserves to launch a concerted counter-offensive, and their air force is increasingly overtasked. Combined with the National Unity Government’s revenue denial strategy, Myanmar’s continued economic tailspin, and the increasingly tight U.S., U.K., and E.U. sanctions, the junta bleeds from a thousand cuts. The junta itself admitted earlier this year that it lacks control over almost half of the country.


Myanmar is home to hundreds of armed actors, and a pan-ethnic coalition was always the military’s greatest post-coup threat. However, forging such an alliance is an immense task given the deep divides existing between the Bamar majority and the numerous historically oppressed ethnic minority groups. Initiatives like the National Unity Consultative Council aim to address these challenges by bringing a diverse range of actors together to talk, but it remains slow going.

Buying off or isolating rival factions and groups is the military’s historical playbook in dealing with opponents to its authority. For example, the military convinced a faction within the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army to revolt in 2009, which proceeded to split and form the now regime-aligned Kokang Border Guards Force. More recently, the Arakan Army agreed to an informal ceasefire with the junta in Rakhine State in 2022, allowing the junta to focus elsewhere. In the current fighting, the Myanmar military employs an airpower compellence strategy against opposing ethnic armed organizations and “Four Cuts” operations targeting civilians and villages with indiscriminate violence to intimidate the population. The junta’s objective is to drag out the war, exhaust the population, split the ethnic minorities along the periphery from the Bamar of the interior, and then pick them off one by one over time.
Fighting has also reportedly surged in the Chin State, Magwe, and Sagaing Regions. The capture of Kawlin represents a serious advance in the People’s Defense Forces’ ability to take towns. If Loikaw falls to resistance forces, it will be the first state capital taken.

China’s mediation efforts specifically targeted the Three Brotherhood Alliance, which it has long backed publicly and privately. Indeed, the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army are ethnically Kokang Chinese and closely tied to China and authorities in Yunnan Province. Beijing has historically supported the border ethnic armed organizations and armed them via the United Wa State Army, the largest and best-equipped group. China often tries to play broker in peace talks.

However, China’s influence on the Three Brotherhood Alliance is apparently less than it once seemed. Although the United Wa State Army has cooperated with China in publicly cracking down on growing human trafficking and cybercrimes along the border, including by giving up high-ranking officials, the Three Brotherhood Alliance has evidently decided that the military in Myanmar has to go. For China, this is a clear setback and sign of diminished sway over these groups. Instability along the border is a problem given China’s strategic interests in Myanmar and the risk of refugees crossing into Yunnan. Indeed, Beijing confirmed Chinese nationals have been killed in the recent fighting, and a junta artillery shell struck the Chinese side of the border.

The Three Brotherhood Alliance’s statement indicates that it is hoping to secure Beijing’s backing. The three ethnic armed organizations announced that “our commitment extends to combatting the widespread online gambling fraud that has plagued Myanmar, particularly along the China-Myanmar border.” By taking an explicitly anti-crime stance and reportedly raiding criminal networks, the Three Brotherhood Alliance is directly appealing to Beijing’s interests. During fighting outside the border town of Laukkai, where many criminal networks operate, the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army was careful to argue that the Myanmar junta was protecting local criminal leadership from China’s crackdowns. The Three Brotherhood Alliance hopes to draw a contrast with the Myanmar military junta, which has dragged its feet on cracking down on such a lucrative illicit funding source. Operation 1027 is also targeting the Kokang Border Guards Force, a militia aligned with the junta that is notorious for its ties to criminal networks.
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by ricky_v »

https://asiatimes.com/2024/01/myanmar-i ... -to-china/
The unprecedented “Operation 1027” resistance offensive launched in late October 2023 continues to make advances on Myanmar military positions in northern Shan State.

Hundreds of ruling State Administration Council (SAC) bases have fallen or been abandoned to the rolling onslaught of the Three Brotherhood Alliance (3BA) comprised of the insurgent Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (MNDAA), Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) and the Arakan Army (AA).

The major towns of Hsenwi and Kutkai, both north of the main SAC-controlled (for now) city of Lashio, have fallen along with Namshan and Namtu.

The Kokang enclave capital of Laukkai has been recaptured after 15 years, and in a flourish of civil war theater, the towns of Hopang and Panglong have been “taken” by the alliance and handed over to Myanmar’s largest non-state armed group, the United Wa State Army (UWSA)
Today’s report of a “cease-fire” brokered by China between the SAC and 3BA may take the momentum out of the offensive, or like similar talks in recent weeks, do little to shape events on the ground in northern Shan state and hardly impact on armed conflict in so many other areas of Myanmar, especially as fighting rages in Rakhine state and the Karenni and Sagaing regions.

Yet in many respects, Operation 1027 has already achieved many of the long-standing aims of the MNDAA, as outlined in a recent New Year public message from its commander Lieutenant General Peng Deren, who is also the General Secretary of the group’s “political wing”, known as the Myanmar National Justice Party (MNJP).

The statement is a detailed and intriguing addition to the quixotic area of insurgent communications and strategic messaging, at times virtue signaling, to multiple audiences.
Unlike the Myanmar language version, the original Chinese referred to the offensive as “Operation 1027 Hurricane (Jùfēng)”, which appears to be a designation almost totally absent from most media coverage of the past several weeks.

Peng claimed the operation had seized 250 “large and small (SAC) military strongholds…blocked several large-scale reinforcements”, accepted some 1,000 surrendering troops, claimed five border crossings, forcibly closed down 300 ‘electronic fraud dens’ (Chinese organized crime-run scam call centers) and sent back 40,000 “fraudsters to return home and surrender.”

As is well established by now, a prime objective of Operation 1027 was to close down the border scam centers. “The harm of electronic fraud to human society is comparable to that of drugs, and is far more severe and profound than a new coronavirus epidemic!”
(emphasis in original) the Kokang leader stated amid reports of horrific mistreatment of captives, including the massacre perpetrated in the so-called “1020 Crouching Tiger Villa Incident” in Laukkai a week before Operation 1027.

Peng further alleges that the SAC military junta spirited away by helicopter, at exorbitant prices for a seat, leaders of the scam centers to KK Park near Myawaddy on the Myanmar-Thailand border, “the largest electronic fraud park in Southeast Asia.”
Yet the MNDAA, at least for the past 14 years and likely since its formation in 1989, is neither (ethnic) “Myanma” (Bama) or “national”, and certainly not “democratic.”

The Kokang enclave has been an isolated hive of illicit enterprise since 1989 when the MNDAA was formed out of factions of the imploding Communist Party of Burma (CPB) by Peng Deren’s father, the colorful drug trade personality Peng Jaisheng.

An anti-military guerilla and opium merchant, the older Peng created a semi-autonomous enclave, legally guaranteed by the 2008 constitution, until his ousting by the army in 2009 (personally led by SAC leader Senior General Min Aung Hlaing).


Peng Jaisheng’s funeral in 2022 in another China-Myanmar border enclave called Mong La was a guerilla’s gala of A-list veteran and new-wave rebel leaders: many who led Operation 1027 and post-coup resistance forces such as the Karenni National Defense Force (KNDF) were in attendance.

The MNDAA conducted a major offensive in 2015 to wrestle control of Laukkai away from their bitter rivals who expelled the Peng family 15 years ago: “the Four Big Families…in Kokang Old Street” heavily involved in the call center scams according to Peng’s statement.
In one of northern Shan state’s most surreal conflict incidents, the MNDAA raided several casinos in Laukkai in March 2017, reaping an estimated US$73 million according to an investigation by Ann Wang in the South China Morning Post.

Far from “justice” or “democracy”, the MNDAA’s struggle is largely predicated on restoring its monopoly on criminal enterprise in Kokang Another post-1027 reality is the centrality of China to the gravity of the northern theater of Myanmar’s post-coup civil war.

It is still a matter of speculation what role China played in the preparation for the offensive, but the synchronicity of a Chinese official call-center crackdown and an anti-SAC military operation against the Myanmar army with multiple interlocking agendas for all the EAOs involved was almost certainly within Beijing’s tolerance zone.

If Peng’s allegations that Chinese gangsters were spirited away by helicopter to the Thailand-Myanmar border scam centers, then it behooves American officials to consider listing the local warlord Saw Chit Thu and the Kayin State Border Guard Force (BGF) that provides protection for these border zones and has been involved in various illicit rackets over the years.
how in hell are scam call centres the target of ire of a civil war? bizzarre times to be alive in, i guess
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4099
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by sanman »

How have rebels in Myanmar taken over a base near the China border?

Is China perhaps behind it? Or is USA behind it?

sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4099
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by sanman »

Is Myanmar aiding Kuki-Chin militants in NorthEast?
If so, why?
Is it just because their junta are flunkies of Beijing?





Interesting drone stuff in 2nd half of vid.
tandav
BRFite
Posts: 849
Joined: 26 Aug 2016 08:24

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by tandav »

The Chinese strategy is to prop up splinter groups in neighboring countries and do Salami slicing to gain defacto control over key resources such as mines, rivers, ports, and territory. Throw in a bunch of drug trade, illegal mining and forest logging, human smuggling, trafficking women, operating fraud call centers from such conflict ridden locations is quite a huge money maker for PLA / CCP kingpin/ gangster. There is a continuum of formal informal chain of command from petty rowdies on street in Shan county Myanmaar to the CCP general across the border in China
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by ricky_v »

https://asiatimes.com/2024/11/the-stran ... ine-state/

Image
Myanmar’s war-ravaged Rakhine state faces a humanitarian catastrophe just as the insurgent Arakan Army (AA) looks set to take almost complete control of the area from the border with Bangladesh down to the Irrawaddy Delta after a year of brutal armed conflict.

The anti-military AA is currently besieging the central town of Ann, home to the Myanmar military’s Western Command, and is still engaged in furious fighting in Maungdaw to overrun Border Guard Police Camp 5, the final installation after months of grinding street battles and destructive drone warfare. .

The AA has seized more than ten townships in several months of brutal fighting. The state capital, Sittwe, is effectively surrounded, forcing thousands of inhabitants to flee south to Yangon by ship.
The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has warned that Rakhine state is at risk of a widespread famine, with two million people facing possible starvation. A recent report claims that by March 2025 only 20% of the domestic food production needs will be met.

“Internal rice production is plummeting due to a lack of seeds, fertilizers, severe weather conditions, a steep rise in the number of internally displaced people (IDPs) who can no longer engage in cultivation, and escalating conflict,” the UNDP report says.

Rakhine scholar Kyaw Hsan Hlaing has recently outlined the broad attempts “to establish legitimacy among diverse communities in Rakhine state, including the Rohingya.”

Having gradually expanded its public services as it gained more territory and “control” over a greater percentage of the population, the AA now faces the arduous task of “governing” while also fighting a war for control of the state.

The Center for Arakan Studies (CAS) has analyzed the AA’s burgeoning judicial system, which clearly illustrates the armed groups “seeing like a state” approach.

Rakhine’s conflict has been compounded by the incomprehensible arrangement reached by the Rohingya Solidarity Organization (RSO) and Arakan Rohingya Solidarity Army (ARSA) armed groups to cooperate with the Myanmar military and jointly wage war on the AA.

It was ARSA’s attacks against Myanmar security force outposts in 2016 and 2017 that sparked the military’s mass ethnic cleansing campaign that forced some 700,000 Rohingya across the border into Bangladesh.

The AA have clashed numerous times with Rohingya militants and have raided their alleged military camps in northern Maungdaw. Many militants are recruiting fighters in the teeming Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar and among local populations in Maungdaw and Buthidaung.

That disconnect was especially apparent after fierce fighting in Maungdaw in mid-2024. There is also widespread speculation that the Bangladesh military is assisting the RSO with arms and training.

However, blockades are being imposed due to inter-ethnic enmity. The Central Young Lai Association, an ethnic Chin organization based in Mizoram in northeast India, has been stopping food and fuel shipments from India to Paletwa, and then further down into Rakhine State.

sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4099
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by sanman »

Arakan Army taking over border area between Myanmar and Bangladesh, possible effects on Rohingya population

ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by ricky_v »

came across this site in the wild, looks to have a decent collection of literature, posting one that is relevant

https://pacforum.org/publications/pacne ... hallenges/
Just 15 years after its founding, the Arakan Army (AA) has risen to dominate Rakhine State in western Myanmar, controlling 15 of 17 key townships and over 90% of the territory, including the entire 271-kilometer border with Bangladesh. These military advances include the historic capture of Ann Township’s Western Regional Command headquarters, cementing the AA’s military and administrative dominance. Through its Arakan People’s Revolutionary Government (APRG), the AA governs key sectors, from judiciary to public health, signaling its ambition for greater autonomy with confederate status. With Rakhine’s strategic location, natural resources, and proximity to China-backed infrastructure, the AA’s rise reshapes the region’s geopolitical and security dynamics, presenting both opportunities and challenges for dialogue and stability.


The AA’s rapid territorial expansion has intensified tensions with the Myanmar military. The military junta, struggling to maintain its grip on power, has exploited divisions within Rakhine by recruiting fighters from Rohingya armed groups such as the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army and the Rohingya Solidarity Organization. These actions have deepened ethnic fault lines between the Rakhine Buddhist majority and the Rohingya Muslim minority, exacerbating mistrust and perpetuating cycles of violence. While the AA has articulated a vision for inclusivity, particularly through the APRG’s administrative framework, building trust with marginalized communities—including the Rohingya—remains challenging. The AA’s ability to foster dialogue and demonstrate inclusive governance will determine its success in achieving lasting stability in Rakhine.
Chinese investments in Myanmar are increasingly vulnerable amid the ongoing civil conflict. Since the launch of “Operation 1027,” anti-junta forces have taken control of 23 out of 34 Chinese-funded projects, with key areas affected including Rakhine, northern Shan State, and the central lowlands. But the Three Brotherhood Alliance and the National Unity Government’s People’s Defense Force have refrained from directly targeting Chinese initiatives. However, reports indicate that the junta-backed Pyusawhti militia allegedly attacked the Chinese Consulate in Mandalay in October 2024, marking only the second such incident in the seven-decade history of China-Myanmar diplomatic relations.


In Cox’s Bazar, refugee camps have become recruitment grounds for armed groups, further complicating the conflict landscape. Reports of forced recruitment and promises of citizenship documents have drawn thousands of Rohingya into the military junta’s fold. These dynamics underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to prevent armed group exploitation and support initiatives for peace and security. While the AA has expressed a willingness to include the Rohingya within its vision of an autonomous Rakhine, substantive action will be essential to move beyond rhetoric. Greater integration of Rohingya communities into administrative structures and an emphasis on equitable development could build the foundations for trust and coexistence.

International actors can play a vital role in bridging this divide. Facilitated dialogues between the AA, Rohingya leaders, and other stakeholders could help create a framework for cooperation. Transparency and accountability must underpin these efforts to ensure they yield meaningful outcomes. A unified governance model that incorporates diverse voices could lay the groundwork for long-term stability in Rakhine.

Dialogue with the AA could also pave the way for the voluntary and dignified repatriation of Rohingya refugees. Both India and Bangladesh should recognize the AA’s de facto authority and engage with it as a key stakeholder in Rakhine. Such an approach could foster stability and promote shared regional interests.
Mukesh.Kumar
BRFite
Posts: 1409
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 14:09

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by Mukesh.Kumar »

Horrible earthquake hits Myanmar.

Time for getting in with aid, and possible better relations before the Chinese move in.
krithivas
BRFite
Posts: 779
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: Offline

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by krithivas »

More importantly, before more Rohingyas use this as a pretext to move to India.
Mukesh.Kumar wrote: 28 Mar 2025 18:12 Horrible earthquake hits Myanmar.

Time for getting in with aid, and possible better relations before the Chinese move in.
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6557
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

Hope the usual Christian aid organizations help.
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6557
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

In fact were the Hindu organisations?

Preparing speeches?
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by ricky_v »

if only the myanmmar conflict was as sexy to xitter warriors as the ukraine conflict... we would all be drowning in poor analyses as usual, but then the outrage machinery would have its baleful eye turned towards something of immediate tangible concern instead of discourse with the international gora, we will react poorly to this one as well, when the time has passed well over, and then the xitter experts will be giving gyaan on the best way to deal with problems on the eastern border... hopefully the goi is not stuck in this saas bahu maayajaal, and has eyes on real problems


https://archive.is/QVSIB

China’s Double Game in Myanmar
How Beijing Is Manipulating Civil Conflict to Secure Regional Dominance
It has lost effective control of roughly three-quarters of the country’s territory; surrendered key strategic bases, including two regional military commands, to advancing resistance forces; and now faces a hollowing out of its ranks as defections and demoralization spread. But even though opposition forces have made significant gains nationwide, they have yet to penetrate the military’s stronghold in the center of the country. Opposition forces share the amorphous goal of making the country a federal democratic union, an arrangement that might accommodate the interests of the diverse factions arrayed against the junta. But these groups’ ties remain loose and fragile. With the opposition dispersed throughout the country and lacking both the capacity for reliable communication and the ability to meet safely in person, there are divisions within the resistance that will endure even should victory on the battlefield be in sight.
Only one actor stands to gain from this tragedy: China. In the West, Myanmar’s civil war is often described as a “forgotten conflict.” But for China, the country is a key battleground where Beijing’s regional ambitions, economic interests, and security concerns intersect. A weakened Myanmar is central to China’s goal of establishing uncontested regional hegemony. If Beijing can dominate the country, it constitutes both a strategic barrier against India’s “Act East Policy,” which aims to link India with the fast-growing Southeast Asia region, and a vital foothold for China in mainland Southeast Asia and on the shores of the Indian Ocean. In public statements, Chinese officials insist that they want to restore stability to Myanmar and promote fraternal relations between the two countries. In practice, China props up the faltering junta while simultaneously trying to draw ethnic armed organizations into its orbit, in the process sidelining pro-democracy forces that it believes are too closely aligned with the West.
The China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC) is a key component of Beijing’s BRI strategy, linking China’s Yunnan Province with Myanmar’s vast energy reserves, natural resources, and access to the Indian Ocean.
Myanmar also possesses important resources that China wants. These include critical minerals, natural gas, hydropower, and agricultural commodities. Myanmar provides well over half of China’s heavy rare earth imports, which are essential inputs to high-technology and defense industries. China has long partnered with armed groups to extract these resources with little regard to environmental or social consequences. In 2024, Myanmar supplied China with 50,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides, surpassing China’s domestic production of these materials. Myanmar is also the source of 79.9 percent of China’s tin ore imports, an essential input in the production of semiconductors and other critical technologies.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently insisted that barring other outside powers from meddling in the conflict is one of his main goals; he sees Myanmar as part of China’s exclusive sphere of influence. A senior editor at People’s Daily, the flagship newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, underscored this point in a 2012 Global Times opinion piece, by comparing the significance of sites in Myanmar to that of disputed maritime territories in the South China Sea: “The economic and social stability in Kyaukphyu [China’s deep-sea port currently under construction in Rakhine State in Myanmar] and its surrounding region is no less important than the sovereignty disputes between China and the Philippines over Huangyan Island.”
Not only is China the primary supplier of weapons to these groups, but it also acts as their principal trading partner. These relationships allow Beijing to maintain leverage over nearly all major actors in a divided Myanmar and serve as a strategic hedge in the event of the military’s collapse.
China has always been suspicious of Myanmar’s pro-democratic forces, including especially the National Unity Government, which is primarily composed of individuals deposed in the 2021 coup. Beijing views this group as too close to the West, even though Western powers have provided minimal support. Chinese paranoia deepened after the NUG opened an office in Washington in 2022 and the United States passed the BURMA Act in late 2023, which promised much assistance—aid that it ultimately failed to deliver. Beijing also sought to dissuade other ethnic armed organizations from working with the NUG and instructed them to negotiate with the junta. To be sure, Beijing allowed backchannel communications with the NUG, primarily to protect Chinese commercial assets, but it kept these dealings discreet and noncommittal. As the junta lost more territory, some Chinese companies paid taxes or partnered with ethnic armed organizations and armed groups affiliated with the NUG to maintain business operations.
The fall of the junta’s Northeastern Regional Command in Lashio in August 2024 set off alarm bells in Beijing, which felt the resistance forces had gone too far. China subsequently abandoned its hedging strategy in favor of aggressive intervention on behalf of the regime. This pivot became evident when Foreign Minister Wang visited junta officials in August 2024, signaling Beijing’s clear support. Soon after, junta chief Min Aung Hlaing traveled to Kunming for his first visit to China since the 2021 coup.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13227
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: India-Myanmar news and discussion

Post by A_Gupta »

The next nonsense has started:

“ Indian authorities allegedly forced dozens of Rohingya refugees off a naval vessel into the sea near Myanmar last week after providing them with life jackets, a United Nations agency, family members of the refugees and their lawyer said.

The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, in a statement on Thursday, said at least 40 Rohingya refugees were detained in New Delhi and cast into the sea by the Indian navy near the maritime border with Myanmar. The refugees — including children, women and older people — swam ashore, but their whereabouts in Myanmar remain unknown, the agency said.”

—-
Plea made in India’s Supreme Court:
https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation ... reme-court
Post Reply