Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 31 Oct 201
Posted: 09 Nov 2011 10:28
Thanks SS. But Bangladesh voted against Pakistan being granted concessionary tariffs. I wonder what that would amount to.
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 663967.cmsText books in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and Christians, while most teachers view religious minorities as " enemies of Islam", according to a study by a US government commission released on Wednesday.
The findings indicate how deeply ingrained hardline Islam is in Pakistan and help explain why militancy is often supported, tolerated or excused in the country.
"Teaching discrimination increases the likelihood that violent religious extremism in Pakistan will continue to grow, weakening religious freedom, national and regional stability, and global security," said Leonard Leo, the chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Are the Bakis biraders of the more pure or they need to make themselves pure before they are able to call themselves the true birathers.RCase wrote:
What, one biratherly country expecting jizya from another biratherly country?
MOve along folks nothing the BRF didnot know. Besides the Chaman Ki Tamasha types will suppress the news sooner then later.wig wrote:Pakistan schools teach Hindu hatred: US commissionhttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 663967.cmsText books in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and Christians, while most teachers view religious minorities as " enemies of Islam", according to a study by a US government commission released on Wednesday.
The findings indicate how deeply ingrained hardline Islam is in Pakistan and help explain why militancy is often supported, tolerated or excused in the country.
"Teaching discrimination increases the likelihood that violent religious extremism in Pakistan will continue to grow, weakening religious freedom, national and regional stability, and global security," said Leonard Leo, the chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Thanks MMS for supporting the Pakis, no we know what so called MFN status(which will never come) was all about.Rana wrote:Bangladesh votes against Pakistan in WTO
http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.as ... tan-in-WTO
BRUSSELS: Bangladesh has blocked the way that pave Pakistan to get trade concession offered by the European Union as former voted against the country in World Trade Organisation (WTO), sources said.
According to the sources, Bangladesh had assured Pakistan that it would support latter in WTO. Meanwhile, India voted in support for Pakistan.
Sources said that European Union wanted Pakistan's entry in WTO.
Right on money Aditya. There is something about Indian rulers since time immemorial that can never be understood.Aditya_V wrote: Bangladesh votes against Pakistan in WTO
http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.as ... tan-in-WTO
Thanks MMS for supporting the Pakis, no we know what so called MFN status(which will never come) was all about.BRUSSELS: Bangladesh has blocked the way that pave Pakistan to get trade concession offered by the European Union as former voted against the country in World Trade Organisation (WTO), sources said.
According to the sources, Bangladesh had assured Pakistan that it would support latter in WTO. Meanwhile, India voted in support for Pakistan.
Sources said that European Union wanted Pakistan's entry in WTO.
I am really beginning to wonder if some of our Politically elite are so connected with RAPE, that they are willing to overlook what is in the interest of India.
Atleast Bangladesh has better brains.
VikasRaina wrote:{quote="Aditya_V"} Bangladesh votes against Pakistan in WTO
http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.as ... tan-in-WTO
Thanks MMS for supporting the Pakis, no we know what so called MFN status(which will never come) was all about.BRUSSELS: Bangladesh has blocked the way that pave Pakistan to get trade concession offered by the European Union as former voted against the country in World Trade Organisation (WTO), sources said.
According to the sources, Bangladesh had assured Pakistan that it would support latter in WTO. Meanwhile, India voted in support for Pakistan.
Sources said that European Union wanted Pakistan's entry in WTO.
I am really beginning to wonder if some of our Politically elite are so connected with RAPE, that they are willing to overlook what is in the interest of India.
Atleast Bangladesh has better brains.
Right on money Aditya. There is something about Indian rulers since time immemorial that can never be understood.
and the same MMS will bumble and fumble when next set of poor Indians will be killed by Paki terrorists.
Anyways what are MMS's ties to India ? Born in TSP (and proud of it), living in Delhi, serving SG, Daughter a GC holder in USA....
VikasRaina : you can be pretty sure that Hindu and Sikh girls and women any where in India - even in Jammu and in Kashmir are safe from abductions as are still going on in the paki lands. There is a threat in Kashmir, but the army keeps a tight lid on any such attempted activities. My neice's husband, an infantry General, headed up a taskforce charged with eliminating such threats there. Over ten years, he did eliminate those threats, and in his last year before retiring, had taken charge of security for pilgrims going to Amarnath.VikasRaina wrote:Sbajwa/Parsuram ji: I had assumed that all these Kabila/Invader practices of Muslims in Punjab and adjoining areas were crushed and curbed by rule of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. I was surprised to read that pre-47, this still was prevalent in areas now under Paki occupition.
Are there areas in India where Hindu/sikh girls are still abducted like they way it used to happen in West Punjab?
I think the ferocity of reaction by Hindus/Sikhs during 47 riots was culmination of the anger and fear that had been bottled up for so many centuries.
He is a Fascist/ RSS fanatic, he is lying he cannot be telling the truth.parsuram wrote:VikasRaina : you can be pretty sure that Hindu and Sikh girls and women any where in India - even in Jammu and in Kashmir are safe from abductions as are still going on in the paki lands. There is a threat in Kashmir, but the army keeps a tight lid on any such attempted activities. My neice's husband, an infantry General, headed up a taskforce charged with eliminating such threats there. Over ten years, he did eliminate those threats, and in his last year before retiring, had taken charge of security for pilgrims going to Amarnath.VikasRaina wrote:Sbajwa/Parsuram ji: I had assumed that all these Kabila/Invader practices of Muslims in Punjab and adjoining areas were crushed and curbed by rule of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. I was surprised to read that pre-47, this still was prevalent in areas now under Paki occupition.
Are there areas in India where Hindu/sikh girls are still abducted like they way it used to happen in West Punjab?
I think the ferocity of reaction by Hindus/Sikhs during 47 riots was culmination of the anger and fear that had been bottled up for so many centuries.
Express Tribune.Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) confirmed on Tuesday that Iran has shut its airspace to Pakistani air craft due to a six-month backlog in transit payments.
PIA owes Iran close to $600,000 in past payments.
Just who the hell are you talking about. And what do you know of what time frame I'm talking about. Before you go calling people liars, people who have put their life on the line with long and hard service on the ground in Kashmir, you had better have really good reason and facts on your side. From where I am, you have neither reason nor facts.He is a Fascist/ RSS fanatic, he is lying he cannot be telling the truth.
parsuramparsuram wrote:Aditya_V:
Just who the hell are you talking about. And what do you know of what time frame I'm talking about. Before you go calling people liars, people who have put their life on the line with long and hard service on the ground in Kashmir, you had better have really good reason and facts on your side. From where I am, you have neither reason nor facts.He is a Fascist/ RSS fanatic, he is lying he cannot be telling the truth.
PS I ask that you either put up facts or withdraw your post.
Would it be too much to assume that pakis supplied a nuke to Haqqanis?Dilbu wrote:There is a deal between TSP and Unkil to limit the movement of Haqqanis. Pakis get to keep their pet dogs for use against India or Afghanistan at a later date while unkil can use the relative peace and quite to cut and run from Af-pak. Unkil has blinked.
Well, aditya, I have obviously been away from the forum too long to have stayed current with nuances of expression, sarcasm and the like, and this is the second time today I have got into trouble because of it. I will do well to stop before it gets any worse. Admin/mods can edit/delete what ever is necesary.Aditya_V wrote:I think he missed the sarcasm of me imitating a JNU/ establishment person reaction would be. Parsuram- be prepared for these kind of responses.
I will not withdraw my post as it expresses the life in denial mode which many key decision makers seem to be living.
not any more. Now China has overtaken Sialkot industry.shiv wrote:soccer balls.ramana wrote:Why would EU want TSP in WTO? Other than terrorism what does TSP trade in?
I think so.a_kumar wrote:What if GoI had foreknowledge of Bangladesh's voting choice?
Supplying nukes to Haqqanis is a bogus threat by pakis just like unkil's threat of invading TSP to take out Haqqanis. That option is always on the table but neither one of them will resort to it because it will only complicate things for themselves. If they are supplied with nukes, Haqqanis will not think twice before using it against the west/unkil without the knowledge of TSPA and there will be consequences. Similarly any US military action against TSP will have to be a bigger campaign than Iraq or Af-Pak and that is exactly something they aretrying to avoid getting into. So the only available option is a compromise. Unkil gave up the security of Af-PAk for his own goals and TSPA gave up their proxy jeehard against unkil and decided to keep quiet for a while. No change in situation for TSP's neighbours.Altair wrote:Would it be too much to assume that pakis supplied a nuke to Haqqanis?Dilbu wrote:There is a deal between TSP and Unkil to limit the movement of Haqqanis. Pakis get to keep their pet dogs for use against India or Afghanistan at a later date while unkil can use the relative peace and quite to cut and run from Af-pak. Unkil has blinked.
@29:37 Pakiness personified.....lets blame the victim. A pakifather trying to defend his 2 paki offsprings convicted of rape by blaming it on the girls and the system.habal wrote:Paki pedofiles and sex-maniacs target UK girls. It's a continuation of Parsuram's pakjab story here it seems:
That 'Pakiness' has a source elsewhere as that mullah in Oz blamed 'uncovered meat' for such behaviour a few years back.anishns wrote:@29:37 Pakiness personified.....lets blame the victim. A pakifather trying to defend his 2 paki offsprings convicted of rape by blaming it on the girls and the system.
ISLAMABAD — Text books in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and other religious minorities, while most teachers view non-Muslims as “enemies of Islam,” according to a study by a U.S. government commission released Wednesday.
The findings indicate how deeply ingrained hardline Islam is in Pakistan and help explain why militancy is often supported, tolerated or excused in the country.
The study reviewed more than 100 textbooks from grades 1-10 from Pakistan’s four provinces. Researchers in February this year visited 37 public schools, interviewing 277 students and teachers, and 19 madrases, where they interviewed 226 students and teachers.
“Religious minorities are often portrayed as inferior or second-class citizens who have been granted limited rights and privileges by generous Pakistani Muslims, for which they should be grateful,” the report said. “Hindus are repeatedly described as extremists and eternal enemies of Islam whose culture and society is based on injustice and cruelty, while Islam delivers a message of peace and brotherhood, concepts portrayed as alien to the Hindu.”
The researchers also found that the books foster a sense that Pakistan’s Islamic identity is under constant threat.
“The anti-Islamic forces are always trying to finish the Islamic domination of the world,” read one passage from a social studies text being taught to Grade 4 students in Punjab province, the country’s most populated. “This can cause danger for the very existence of Islam. Today, the defense of Pakistan and Islam is very much in need.”
Attempts to reach Pakistan’s education minister were not successful.
To me that is purely downhill skiing like pakis after our forces gave a bloody nose. What a letdown! Really, I expected some action atleast for the media sake. So US has effectively recognized Haqqanis as a regional power and Pakistan as a power player?WTF?Dilbu wrote:
Supplying nukes to Haqqanis is a bogus threat by pakis just like unkil's threat of invading TSP to take out Haqqanis. That option is always on the table but neither one of them will resort to it because it will only complicate things for themselves. If they are supplied with nukes, Haqqanis will not think twice before using it against the west/unkil without the knowledge of TSPA and there will be consequences. Similarly any US military action against TSP will have to be a bigger campaign than Iraq or Af-Pak and that is exactly something they aretrying to avoid getting into. So the only available option is a compromise. Unkil gave up the security of Af-PAk for his own goals and TSPA gave up their proxy jeehard against unkil and decided to keep quiet for a while. No change in situation for TSP's neighbours.
ISLAMABAD, Nov. 8 (Xinhua) -- Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said on Tuesday that Pakistan and the United States must restrain from uncalled-for public criticism as it undermines efforts to work closely for shared goals.
Zardari made the remarks when he held talks with a delegation of U.S. congressmen led by republican Michael McCaul in Karachi and discussed bilateral relations, strategic dialogue, war against terror, situation in Afghanistan and overall regional situation, the Presidential office said in a statement.
Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's former president, has told HARDtalk's Stephen Sackur that the Taliban leader Mullah Omar is not and has "never been in Pakistan".
He also agreed that the relationship between Pakistan and the US has "fundamentally broken down", saying it is at the "lowest ebb".
With his country racked by extremist violence, endemic corruption and deeply troubled relations with Afghanistan, India and the United States, Mr Musharraf is seeking a comeback. In the full interview Stephen Sackur asks why he thinks he is the solution to Pakistan's problems.
It is referred as "Intellectual masturbation". To me these people are p_rn stars.Dilbu wrote:WKKism ki jai hor. Read the full article to make your blood boil or ROTFL depending on how seriously you take it.![]()
Former Indian minister suggests South Asian Union
Is this trying to see silver in spit. Like I always say, Sometimes a cigar is a cigar and most of the times, actions of this govt are knee jerk and driven by WKK sentiments.Dilbu wrote:I think so.a_kumar wrote:What if GoI had foreknowledge of Bangladesh's voting choice?
The best part is none of these worthies have legitimate sources of Income, yet stay visit 5 star hotels , Jet set around the world in Ist class and criticize the Indian middle class for being too consumeristic.Altair wrote:It is referred as "Intellectual masturbation". To me these people are p_rn stars.Dilbu wrote:WKKism ki jai hor. Read the full article to make your blood boil or ROTFL depending on how seriously you take it.![]()
Former Indian minister suggests South Asian Union
Dilbu wrote:WKKism ki jai hor. Read the full article to make your blood boil or ROTFL depending on how seriously you take it.![]()
Former Indian minister suggests South Asian Union
Isn't he the same traitor who collected money for China during 1962 war...Aiyar outlined following steps that include return to the Musharraf-Manmohan proposal to create a borderless Kashmir — where the Line of Control is rendered irrelevant – as a precursor to a borderless subcontinent.
That was the time when Khalistan trouble started with TSP help, Pakis acquired Nukes from Chinese while we happily did not weaponise, Pakis then started Kashmir trouble in 1989.sum wrote:^^ How we ever got through the 70s/80s with IFS filled with guys like Natwar Singh, MSA, MKB etc will remain a mystery!!
One shudders to even visualize what damage they caused to India, about which details have not yet come out, when they were in service.sum wrote:^^ How we ever got through the 70s/80s with IFS filled with guys like Natwar Singh, MSA, MKB etc will remain a mystery!!