Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Peregrine »

India snubs Pak on Agra pilgrimage
Even as they seek to control damage from the cross-LoC trade standoff, India and Pakistan are in for fresh acrimony over a visit by Pakistan pilgrims (zaireen) to India. The government has said no to a "sudden" request from Pakistan to allow over 150 such pilgrims to visit a little known shrine in Agra.

The government seemed unconvinced about the purpose of the visit as this was apparently the first time Pakistan zaireen had shown any interest in visiting the shrine in large numbers. The organising committee at the shrine itself raised questions about the motive for the visit.

Cheers Image
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2600
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by RCase »

Brad Goodman wrote:subhanallah

Learning to detect an IED hidden in a fake Quran at Pakistan's anti-bomb school
RISALPUR, Pakistan -- Militants in Pakistan have found clever ways to hide homemade bombs. They've been strapped to children's bicycles, hidden inside water jugs and even hung in tree branches. But the most shocking place that Brig. Basim Saeed has heard of such a device being planted was inside a hollowed-out book made to look like a Quran, Islam's holy book.

A soldier who went to pick up the book from the floor was killed when it exploded.{exploding hoko :rotfl: }
So many technical questions baffles this mind:

1. Is the momeen who hollows out HoKo or similiar looking book committing blasphemy or is he a ghazi?
2. Is the maker of the book that is made to be a pretend HoKo a kaffir, eligible for bull-cutlet?
3. Is the person putting the book on the floor a munafiq, eligible for bull-cutlet?
4. What happens to the fauji biradher who gets shakina when he picks up the book? Is he shaheed or kaffir?
5. What is the punishment for blasphemous fauji biradher who destroys the exploding HoKo?
6. What will be the punishment for fauji biradher if he misfortunately destroys a genuine HoKo in the process of bum detection?
7. During training process, do they use similar looking pretend HoKos? Isn't that blasphemous?
8. Shouldn't all books be banned in al-Bakistan?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by SSridhar »

LakshO wrote:PCB chief on ICC reorg

From the above
Pakistan has not hosted India for seven years and during the meeting, according to Zaka, the BCCI offered to resume cricketing ties :shock: :evil: . "The BCCI offered to all the cricket boards of the world, they offered us a lot, too,” the PCB chief said. “They told us they will make a bankable document and they won’t back out from their promise."
Does BCCI have the mandate to make these kinds of decisions? Are they making commitments that they can't keep? Pawar & Srinivasan can make a mess out of IPL but they can't decide on series with pakis, either in India or in pakiland.
LakshO, first of all, it is a Paki report and its credibility is suspect just because of that fact alone. Secondly, BCCI could also have given these blandishments to secure support for their proposal. Thirdly, just recall whatAmb. Jaishankar said in Washington the other day. Various Indian departments act independently without any coordinated approach.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Prem »

The Kishanganga verdict
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-229858-The-Kishanganga-verdictVictory Like 65
The court, however, decided that the critical period on which to base which project crystallised first was that after the year 2000, particularly the developments between 2004 and 2006. The court felt that during this period, India demonstrated a serious intent to move ahead with the project and took steps to make KHEP a reality while approvals for the NJHP from Wapda, Pakistan’s Economic Coordination Committee and the Pakistani Cabinet were not received until 2007. Funding for the NJHP was still being sought early that year and only in January 2008 was a letter of commencement issued.
Thus, Pakistan lost out on its biggest claim for the ‘existing use’ of Neelum’s water for the NJHP and, along with it, its biggest case for seeking a high minimum flow release downstream of KHEP.
The existing agricultural uses of Neelum’s water are almost non-existent; the villages and towns in the mountainous north along the Neelum River down to Muzaffarabad irrigate land using the chashmas and streams flowing down the mountain slopes.
In making a case for a minimum flow higher than what India was willing to offer, the concept of environmental flows came to Pakistan’s rescue. India offered 4.25 cubic metres per second (cumecs) below KHEP for the purpose. Pakistani experts offered an analysis of a number a minimum flow scenarios and their effects on downstream aquatic ecosystems. Pakistan concluded that minimum flows of 40 cumecs or more would be ideal, while minimum flows between the range of 13 to 20 cumecs would maintain a condition which is lower than would generally be considered appropriate for the river. Anything lower would not generally be seen among river scientists as offering an acceptable condition for the river.The court felt that India had used too simple an assessment methodology to arrive at its estimate for an appropriate environmental flow. On the other hand, it commended Pakistan for its far more extensive analysis which attempted to capture complex interactions within he river ecosystem.The court also expressed confidence that this volume, along with the flow contribution to the Neelum River of tributaries that lie downstream from the KHEP and past the LoC, will ensure sufficient water in the river for future agricultural uses in the Neelum Valley.
With the close of the Kishanganga arbitration process, there are some lessons for both India and Pakistan to learn. By dilly-dallying on the NJHP, Pakistan left the window of opportunity open to India to make full use of the provisions of the treaty. It is therefore important for Pakistan to now focus all energies on developing its ‘existing uses’ on all the western rivers to prevent the legal diversions of our waters by Indian projects in the future. While all Indian diversions within the ambit of the treaty eventually return to Pakistan, river water flowing in the north of Pakistan has greater hydropower potential than the same water flowing in the flatter south.
Both India and Pakistan, having lost out on the designed hydropower-generating capacities of KHEP and the NJHP must realise that it is time to change tact. Our politicians, experts and media should refrain from turning the water issue into a cricket match. There is a massive need for combined scientific research and data-gathering on the plethora of issues related to hydrology and water management of the Indus Basin. Water scarcity is a threat that has already arrived at our doorsteps. The only way of tackling it is through cooperation, not persistent reliance on arbitrations.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Anujan »

So the Taliban want Imran khan to negotiate on their behalf. Imran has politely refused saying that the talibs should select their own people.

Note that the talibs selected him. Not the government.
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Nandu »

^ And Shrilleen (aka Shrieking Bimari according to TFT), says this is proof that Imran is universally loved. :rotfl:
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Anujan »

http://www.dawn.com/news/1084328
Maulana Masood Azhar, a notorious militant leader in Pakistan, resurfaced last week when he addressed by phone thousands of his supporters in Muzaffarabad.

The rally in Muzaffarabad was very well organised –thousands of people were bussed to the venue. So, it is not possible that the local administration and security agencies did not know about the event, which was held for the launch of a book written by Kashmiri leader Mohammed Afzal Guru who was executed by the Indian authorities.

It is true that Mr Guru’s death triggered widespread anger on both sides of the Line of Control and the large gathering was to be expected. But the fiery speech delivered by Masood Azhar on the occasion was bound to raise eyebrows. He reportedly called upon Pakistani authorities to lift restrictions on ‘jihad’.
partha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4555
Joined: 02 Jul 2010 15:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by partha »

^
That he resurfaced after many years shows that Pakistani authorities have already lifted whatever restrictions were there on Jihad on India, no?
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Anujan »

Nawaz effect. The fellow and his brother patronize all Punjabi groups.
Rajdeep
BRFite
Posts: 491
Joined: 23 Aug 2010 20:48

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Rajdeep »


'The Siege: 68 Hours Inside the Taj Hotel': VICE Podcast 030
If any BRFite has read the book , is there any new info ? is it just unkil perspective ?
Will try to update when i watch the video later. But if anyone can provide a gist it would be great.
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by arun »

Anujan wrote:http://www.dawn.com/news/1084328
Maulana Masood Azhar, a notorious militant leader in Pakistan, resurfaced last week when he addressed by phone thousands of his supporters in Muzaffarabad.

The rally in Muzaffarabad was very well organised –thousands of people were bussed to the venue. So, it is not possible that the local administration and security agencies did not know about the event, which was held for the launch of a book written by Kashmiri leader Mohammed Afzal Guru who was executed by the Indian authorities.

It is true that Mr Guru’s death triggered widespread anger on both sides of the Line of Control and the large gathering was to be expected. But the fiery speech delivered by Masood Azhar on the occasion was bound to raise eyebrows. He reportedly called upon Pakistani authorities to lift restrictions on ‘jihad’.
Meanwhile the Islamic Republic of Pakistan continues to suffer from the blowback of support to Mohammadden terrorists targeting India :

168 killed, 401 injured in 42 bomb attacks across Pakistan in January
svenkat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4727
Joined: 19 May 2009 17:23

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by svenkat »

I think this was not mentioned in BRF reports.The 20 people killed in Bannu suicide attack were from FC.Usual cannon fodder.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by SSridhar »

Anujan wrote:http://www.dawn.com/news/1084328
Maulana Masood Azhar, a notorious militant leader in Pakistan, resurfaced last week when he addressed by phone thousands of his supporters in Muzaffarabad. . . . the fiery speech delivered by Masood Azhar on the occasion was bound to raise eyebrows. He reportedly called upon Pakistani authorities to lift restrictions on ‘jihad’.
Timing & place are important.

Split from Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, the creation of JeM is attributed to Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, chief of ISI (between 1999 – 2001) and who had a double-deal with AQAM that led to his ouster under American pressure. JeM conducted its first operation, a suicide attack on the Badami Bagh cantonment, on April 19, 2000 within three months of its creation.

This is a sarkari outfit (though it did attack Musharraf, Karachi corps commander and took part in the massacre of Pakistani troops in Mogadishu) and is being resurrected to unleash a 1989-like situation in Kashir in view of the emerging Afghanistan situation. There is no doubt about that. We should shortly expect a major terror attack.

The place is also important. Muzzafarabad. JeM is headquartered in Bahawalpur, it has a terror training camp at Chowk Azam, Bahawalpur and another at Balakot, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. It runs Manzur-ul-Islam madrassah in Lahore. And, this address was organized at Muzzafarabad. The signal is clear.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by anupmisra »

SSridhar wrote: Timing & place are important.

Split from Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, the creation of JeM is attributed to Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, chief of ISI (between 1999 – 2001)
Timing, place and people.
Lieutenant General Mahmud Ahmed (HI(M)), is a veteran intelligence officer and a retired three-star general in the Pakistan Army who served as a director general of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the principal intelligence body of Pakistan. He along with other generals were successful in overthrowing the elected government of prime minister Nawaz Sharif, in the 1999 coup d'état to bring General Pervez Musharraf to political power.
Indirectly (and possibly directly), mushy is responsible for creating JeM. Haqqani's book actually connects the dots, if I remember correctly.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Brad Goodman »

puke alert :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

I don’t like India
The long and the short of it is that I do not like India, I do not trust the Indians in India and I have a strong suspicion that they entirely reciprocate these feelings. I have nothing against the Indians as people
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by CRamS »

One of the few things I like about Kujliwal is that he doesn't have TSP on his mind, and this pisses of the equal equal craving TSP RAPE no end. How dare an SDRE ignore us TFTAs is the whine

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 779509.cms
kish
BRFite
Posts: 960
Joined: 07 Jun 2010 23:53

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by kish »

No bomb blast, No sectarian violence, No taliban killing paki soldiers, February has started off in a very dull note. Sad

Very unlike of any Ijjlamic country, Pakisatan being a leader of muslim world should set examples for other muslim countries.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by CRamS »

Rajdeep,

If it is by those Brit clowns, then yes, its a super se uper (borrowing Shilpa babe's phrase) TDP's, Unkil's, and MMS's narrative of "non state actors", and ISI had no role.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by anupmisra »

Brad Goodman wrote:I don’t like India
Here! I rewrote the same article with a few factual changes and corrections, and from an Indian-American perspective:

Why I don’t like Bak-bak-bakistan
The long and the short of it is that I do not like Bakistan, I do not trust the Bakistanis in Bakistan although they should have few grounds to reciprocate these feelings. Besides, I have nothing against the bakistanis used as cannon fodder and as menial workers.

All this talk of friendship with bakistan is getting to me. I would like to ask all the JNU-type commies and ‘friends’ of bakistan to tell me one ‘good’ thing that bakistan has ever done for India, just one. And no, export of baki "islamist pop singers" to Bollywood does not count. As a child, I was brought up on the first-hand stories of murder, rape, forceful conversions, sale of Hindu women in Anarkali Bazar, whole-sale mayhem and massacre of entire neighborhoods perpetrated on Hindus and Sikhs in bakistan at the time of partition. I know, I know, bad things happened in the other direction as a reaction to these atrocities in Punjab and Calcutta but then there was bakistan government and muslim leaders refusing to protect the lives and properties of Hindus and Sikhs, with their qaid-e-hajjam djinnah not even protesting or going into a ‘fast unto death’ to save the minorities. The subsequent baki tribal and military hordes' rape, loot and annexation of Balochistan, Baltistan, Muzafarabad, and Mirpur did not help either. India took the matter to the UN and the bakis refused to comply with the UN request.

During the 1950s, India made huge concessions and allowed free trade and exports of commodities to the economically beleaguered nation of bakistan and allowed accommodation leading to a one-sided Indus Water Treaty (in 1960) which unjustifiably gave the bakistanis share of the five rivers to which they had not historical or economic claim. All this despite the baki-initiated and started two 1965 wars between India and bakistan, which destroyed any further trust of the bakistanis. Since then, things just kept getting worse for India. The Indian economic and military help came to save the lives of millions of Hindu and muslim Bengalis in east bakistan and created a sovereign yet ingrate nation of bangladesh in 1971, and the baki attempts at conquering Siachen and the hills of ‘Kargil’, which was only stopped because US President Clinton supposedly called up Sharief for a dressing down in the White House, has not helped.

Since then there have been several India-led attempts to make things better between the two countries by unconditionally returning 93,000 baki PoWs, letter war criminals escape to bakistan and returning all the land won in the wars to bakistan but nothing good could ever come out of it from the baki side. Perhaps the best yet misguided initiative was the ‘Gujral Doctrine’, offered by I K Gujral and and genuine reapproachment by PM Vajpayee who undertook a personal journey to Lahore as the prime ministers of India during the late 1990s. These peace offerings suggested that India, as the larger and economically bigger power, had the moral responsibility of trying to make peace with its errant and radicalized neighbor. This came to naught after Vajpayee returned to India after the bakis stabbed India in the back. The low point was when India called bakistan's bluff and made it come out of the nuclear closet. Bakistan resorted to sneaking its army personnel dressed as locals into Kargil.

During the last decade, things took a turn for the worse every time an attempt was made by India to arrive at some sort of rapprochment. I remember terrorist attacks and bomb blasts in crowded markets in Mumbai, Delhi and other cities in India that were initiated, supported and managed by so-called "non-state" actors in bakistan. Who can forget the financial and material support to khalistani and Kashmiri terrorists? Who can forget the high-jacking of Indian Airlines flights to Lahore and Kabul? But we know better. As a matter of fact, the world knew that the ‘agencies’ in bakistan had taken control of running the government in bakistan. They would just set off bomb blasts, terror attacks and proxy wars every now and then in India and blame it on Indians. This course of action would of course save the baki side the trouble of having to infiltrate agents across the border to do the needful.

The long and the short of it is that I do not like bakistan, I do not trust the bakistanis in bakistan, and most bakistanis in America. I have much axe to grind against the bakistanis as people. Some of my friends and neighbors in the US are from bakistan. And I get along just fine with a few of them. Some actually have become lifelong friends, especially the ones from Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. Forget the Punjabi-bakis.

For instance, one of my neighbors who is a banker is a shia whose grandfather went to Karachi from Delhi. He grew up in Karachi and attended a prominent business school there. His father had graduated from my dad's alma mater, Allahabad University, around the same time. My wife also became quite friendly with another ‘Up-wali’ doctor whose mother had fond memories of Lucknow where my family originates from. As a matter of fact, at the parties given by these couples, I had the pleasure of consuming some of the best ‘Lakhnawi’ food, unadulterated by the unhealthy food eaten elsewhere in bakistan. During my last visit to Allahabad and Lucknow, I checked up on these families' relatives who bemoaned the fact that their estranged relatives in bakistan took a hasty decision on leaving their ancestral lands.

It is also great fun to watch baki asylum seekers or illiterate students ‘just off the boat’ from bakistan trying to assimilate into the US melting pot. The most interesting ‘cultural confrontation’ was always when the bakis brought their cultural baggage with them and tried to live by the dictates of their inbred upbringing while driving cabs or working as low level drones for Indian bosses in area businesses. This is about here and now, when so called bakistani restaurants try to pass off themselves as Indian and the grocery stores with Indo-bak names are barely surviving behind their true ownerships. From personal experience, I would divide my friends from bakistan into two categories: those with corrupted genes and upbringing who show their bakistaniyat within five years of landing here and those who live off the land by passing themselves off as bakis from India.

Perhaps there existed an ephemeral connection between those of misguided bakis that had their roots in the same part of India as I. One of the most interesting conversations I periodically have with young baki-Americans hinges on where they keep talking of ‘Hindustan’ (modern day India or Bharat), a country they obviously have never seen or ever will but where their families are originally from. The sense of loss of culture and opportunities was utterly palpable in what the young bakis had to say. Too little, too late, I would tell them.

The relationship between India and bakistan as it has evolved over the last six decades is that of a ‘older brother and teacher with a sense of history and self’ and the pesky ‘runt’ that refuses to acknowledge his place in the Indian-subcontinent as a relationship between a more evolved people and a set of selfish people that needs to be brought to their senses with considerable regularity. And now that the runt has achieved ‘nuclear wings’ like an ant that grows a pair before dying, the runt demands "parity and respect or else", which the nation of India finds hard to understand. Considering the ‘terrorist-nation’ tag, the runt is not able to rise to the elder brother's stature as a sign of its immaturity and is now reduced to temper tantrums.

I do not believe that ‘friendship’ between our two countries can or should ever happen like that of US and Canada. The best I can hope for is to get over the "pesky runt" as an irritant and accept the unequal relationship. Grow up as two diverse countries (can hardly call bakistan a nation), with different goals and pursue an uneasy relation based on "hey! you can't choose your neighbors". Internal strife that stays within the borders in bakistan is what is needed. And please! No visa regime between the two countries.
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6591
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by sanjaykumar »

What's this then?

http://www.dawn.com/news/1084327/sindh- ... from-india

So the King Priest and the Fasting Buddha were let go by India!


Lordy, these stupid, moronic people. Sigh... I'll just go over to the Su 30 thread again and count how many bombs it can carry.
Last edited by sanjaykumar on 02 Feb 2014 22:27, edited 1 time in total.
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6591
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by sanjaykumar »

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/01 ... like-india


Does anyone really care why this butt ugly Paki doesn't like India?
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by anupmisra »

kish wrote:No bomb blast, No sectarian violence, No taliban killing paki soldiers, February has started off in a very dull note. Sad. Very unlike of any Ijjlamic country, Pakisatan being a leader of muslim world should set examples for other muslim countries.
One thing you can trust about the bakis is their regularity (such as a bottle of stool softener) and their ability to step up to the plate when the situation demands that they do not disappoint. Here y'go, my friend:

Blasts at Peshawar cinema house leave at least three dead
At least three people were killed and more than 30 others injured on Sunday night in two explosions at a cinema house in the capital of troubled Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan
I wonder what movie was being screened. Waar!!!!??

Wait! Don't go away. Here's another:

ANP leader among eight killed in KP attacks
Unknown gunmen shot dead a senior opposition leader along with two others in Pakistan's northwestern city of Peshawar on Sunday, police said, hours after a bomb attack in another part of the region killed five
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Brad Goodman »

after exploding hoko now we have imploding mosque
Five killed as roof of mosque collapses in Mian Channu
KHANEWAL: Five people were killed and over 50 others sustained serious injuries when a roof of a mosque caved in at Rehmat Colony, Mian Channu on Sunday.

According to Rescue 1122 sources, Qul Khawani of late Maulana Rubnawaz was in progress inside Hussain Ibn-e-Ali Mosque when the roof collapsed.

As a result, Ghulam Muhammad, Bashir Ahmed, Shahnaz Bibi, Peer Bakhash and Ghulam Nabi died on the spot while over 50 others sustained serious injuries.

Rescue 1122 shifted the injured to THQ hospital for medical treatment from where five of them were transferred to Nishtar Hospital Multan in precarious condition.

Women and children were also reciting the Holy Quran in the upper storey of the mosque at the time of incident.

Provincial Parliamentary Secretary for Finance, Rana Babar Hussain, Central General Secretary Jamat Ehal-e-Sunnat Dr Khadim Hussain Dhillo, and Central vice president Maulana Abdul Khaliq Rehmani visited the hospital and inquired about the health of injured.
Is ROP collapsing as well?
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Brad Goodman »

sanjaykumar wrote:http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/01 ... like-india


Does anyone really care why this butt ugly Paki doesn't like India?
When you cannot jump to eat the grapes you call them sour.
joygoswami
BRFite
Posts: 523
Joined: 11 May 2010 19:08
Location: Destination Moon For 5yrs with Zaid Hamid

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by joygoswami »

Blasts at Peshawar cinema house leave at least three dead
At least three people were killed and more than 30 others injured on Sunday night in two explosions at a cinema house in the capital of troubled Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan

I wonder what movie was being screened. Waar!!!!??
Not Shal-waar. This one :rotfl:

CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by CRamS »

AnupmisraJi,

I nominate you for the Indira Gandhi peace prize :-).
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Peregrine »

India set to ease visa restrictions for 180 countries except Pakistan
NEW DELHI : Tourists travelling to India from up to 180 countries will no longer have to queue up at their local consulates to obtain visas under reforms expected to be approved this week, local media reported Sunday.
The citizens of a handful of countries, including Pakistan, will not be included in the changes, the daily said.
Cheers Image
partha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4555
Joined: 02 Jul 2010 15:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by partha »

Checkout the pic in this AFP report.
A Hindu refugee from Pakistan shows her now-expired Indian visa page on her passport. PHOTO: AFP
Last edited by partha on 03 Feb 2014 03:41, edited 1 time in total.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Peregrine »

partha wrote:
Checkout the pic in this establishment controlled AFP report.
partha wrote: A Hindu refugee from Pakistan shows her now-expired Indian visa page on her passport.
partha Ji :

Many thanks.

Cheers Image
Last edited by Peregrine on 04 Feb 2014 03:22, edited 2 times in total.
partha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4555
Joined: 02 Jul 2010 15:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by partha »

^
You are right Peregrineji. Corrected. That was a baseless allegation from me.
partha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4555
Joined: 02 Jul 2010 15:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by partha »

ho raha Bakistan nirman.


Image
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Post by ArmenT »

Some fine pakiness on display here.

Fremont based doctor infects 99 patients with hepatitis-C, due to his habit of reusing syringes. Then takes off right before an investigation starts, to his native Pakistan, claiming that his mother was ill and he would be back in 2 weeks. Then he never returned. He can't be extradited back to the US, as he became the Pakistani public health minister!! Read on for the saga of Dr. Tahir Ali Javed.

http://www.omaha.com/article/20140202/L ... 09752/1685
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Prem »

From The Land of the Incest,Insect and No Intellect

Pakistan: 34% of women say men are justified in hitting wives if they argue back
The 2012-13 PDHS includes results from completed interviews with 13,558 women and 3,134 men age 15-49, all of whom have been married at least once in their lives.The report summarised findings from between 2012 and 2013 on various topics including maternal and child health, infant mortality levels, immunisation and awareness regarding HIV/AIDS.The section ‘Women’s empowerment and demographic and health outcomes’ included a survey on attitudes towards domestic violence. The respondents were presented with six reasons that may be used to justify wife beating.The six circumstances were: if the wife burns the food, if she argues with him, if she goes out without telling him, if she neglects the children, if she refuses to have sexual intercourse with him and if she neglects her in-laws. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple reasons.The most widely accepted reason for wife beating among women in Pakistan is arguing with the husband (34%). 28% of women agree that a husband is justified in beating his wife if she neglects her in-laws and 18% agreed that a husband is justified in beating his wife if she burns the food.Similar to the pattern among women, men are least likely to agree that burning the food is a valid reason for wife beating.The majority of men (19.8%) felt that the most justified reason for beating their wife was the wife going out without telling him.They also show similar levels of support for the other five reasons (16-20%), although at much lower levels than among women.Across all six reasons, women voted in higher numbers than men. Among the respondents, 66% of men didn’t agree with any of the reasons mentioned while the percentage among women was 57.5%
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by anupmisra »

CRamS wrote:AnupmisraJi, I nominate you for the Indira Gandhi peace prize :-).
CRamS, as long as it is not named Arthur Neville "peace in our life" Chamberlain award....
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by anupmisra »

LaWhori logic. India created shortage of water in Pakistan: Abid Sher. Old farticle (from December 2013 but still relevant).
State minister for Water & Power, Abid Sher Ali has said that India has created shortage of water inside Pakistan as it constructed dams on rivers.
So, what's the solution, Dr. Sher?
"If Pakistan did not think seriously about construction of dams its soil will become infertile in future," he mentioned.
Fair enough. As India constructs dams up river, so should bakistan down stream on the same rivers to prevent infertility.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Anujan »

Apparently Afghan intelligence is bull-cutletting the good taliban inside Pakistan and Pakistanis have much takleef with that.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by SSridhar »

Jhujar wrote:Pakistan: 34% of women say men are justified in hitting wives if they argue back
Now, that's a poor score for a Sunni Wahhabi/Deobandi/Takfiri/Salafist country such as TSP.
Rajdeep
BRFite
Posts: 491
Joined: 23 Aug 2010 20:48

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Rajdeep »

CRamS wrote:Rajdeep,

If it is by those Brit clowns, then yes, its a super se uper (borrowing Shilpa babe's phrase) TDP's, Unkil's, and MMS's narrative of "non state actors", and ISI had no role.
They say state support cant be proved but at the same time give names of paki army handlers. how schizzophrenic is that ! wasted my time SMH
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1155
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by sudhan »

Anujan wrote:Apparently Afghan intelligence is bull-cutletting the good taliban inside Pakistan and Pakistanis have much takleef with that.
Marshallah!!

Guess we can soon expect a car bomb to be parked in front of the NDS HQ
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14779
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Jan 04, 2014

Post by Aditya_V »

Peregrine wrote:British report reveals Israel’s arms exports to Pakistan

Israel has exported security equipment over the past five years to Pakistan and four Arab countries, Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted a British government report as saying.

However, a spokesman of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) categorically denied the news report saying it was “misleading” and “not based on facts”.


The report says that in addition to Pakistan, Israel has exported arms and security equipment to Egypt, Algeria, the United Arab Emirates and Morocco.

The report deals with British government permits for arms and security equipment exports and was released by Britain’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

The department oversees security exports and publishes regular reports on permits granted or denied to purchase arms, military equipment or civilian items that are monitored.

Haaretz reported that from January 2008 to December 2012, British authorities processed hundreds of Israeli applications to purchase military items containing British components for use by the Israel Defence Forces, or to go into systems exported to third countries.

The UK government reports also list the countries to which Israel sought to export the items. Among Israel’s clients are countries with which it does not have diplomatic ties.

The report says that in 2011 Israel sought to purchase British components to export radar systems to Pakistan, as well as electronic warfare systems, Head-up Cockpit Displays ?(HUD?), parts for fighter jets and aircraft engines, optic target acquisition systems, components of training aircraft, and military electronic systems.

Prior to that, in 2010, Israel applied for permits to export electronic warfare systems and HUDs with components from Britain to Pakistan. Also in 2010, Israel sought permits to supply Egypt and Morocco with Israeli electronic warfare systems and HUD systems that use British parts, the Haaretz said in its report.

In 2009, Israel requested permits from British authorities to process security equipment exports to Algeria, Morocco and the UAE. The exports processing south for Algeria and the UAE also including permits to supply components for drones.

According to the British reports, Israel’s other clients for military exports over the past five years include India, Singapore, Turkey, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, Sweden, Portugal, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Colombia, Holland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Thailand, Macedonia, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Switzerland, Ecuador, Mexico, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Equatorial Guyana, Poland and Argentina

Cheers Image
Does that mean lots of parts in the JF-17 are Yehudi??
Post Reply