Foreign policy analysts, economists and former diplomats yesterday said the Bangladesh-India summit marked a bold shift in the relationship between the two countries and the success of it would depend on proper implementation of follow-up actions. However, some others regarded the summit as disappointing and said Bangladesh had lost its bargaining position by conceding to Indian demands for allowing use of its ports and signing deals on terrorism. They said Bangladesh got little against its demand for a deal on Teesta water sharing and scrapping Tipaimukh dam project. They were talking at a roundtable organised by The Daily Star yesterday on the summit and its outcome at the newspaper's conference room.
It was felt that the agreements and memorandums of understanding (MoUs) would create new frontiers of economic activities if implemented properly.
For the first time, Bangladesh would be able to trade its service in the form of transportation of Indian goods and thereby reduce the huge trade gap between the two countries. But some others felt that instead of surprising the nation with some of the agreements, the government should have discussed the issues in parliament and reached a consensus. {But the Oppn never turned up in the Jotiya Songsad, no?}
They also felt that the immediate task now is to form a high-level ministerial committee and move towards implementation of the agreements. Prof Rehman Sobhan said the Bangladesh-India summit set the climate for negotiation on unresolved bilateral issues, including maritime and land boundaries and water-sharing issues. He, however, said critical issues cannot be solved in one summit. "A summit is all about atmosphere and communication. Through this summit the climate has been set," he said, adding, "We cannot expect the prime minister to come home with a bagful of goodies."
Adviser to the BNP chairperson, Reaz Rahman, described the outcome of the summit as very disappointing. 
"Look at the Indian gains. There are too many gifts for India. The balance of the game was seriously skewed," he said, terming the move to open up Chittagong and Mongla ports to India "mega concessions". He said Bangladesh made four "mega concessions" in bilateral security, connectivity, economic cooperation and "psychological game". "The concessions will have far-reaching implications," he said. He criticised the government for neither examining the issues nor discussing them with the opposition. On the energy sector, Reaz, who is also the former adviser to the foreign ministry, said the government made a quantum leap into the dark. Bitterly criticising the government for allowing India to use Mongla and Chittagong ports, he said, "In my opinion the Awami League has seriously endangered our nation."
Foreign Minister Dipu Moni strongly protested the statement of Reaz Rahman. She said the visit should be evaluated from the South Asian context. It was not just a bilateral visit as the main focus of the trip was connectivity.
Regarding Reaz's claim about the "quantum leap", she said they were in the dark before as there has been no investment in the power sector during the last seven years. On supporting India for getting permanent membership in the United Nations Security Council, Dipu Moni said the BNP-led government had done the same with Japan on July 14, 2005.
She said the issues of water sharing of the Teesta, Tipaimukh dam project and maritime boundary did not come up suddenly. "After 1975, BNP was in power for 16 years but the issues were never raised," she claimed. Dipu Moni urged her political opponents not to oppose for the sake of opposing. She said Bangladesh wants to move forward.
Former diplomat Farook Sobhan said if Bangladesh wants to accelerate its growth between eight and nine percent and achieve the status of a middle-income country,
there is no other way but to build regional and sub-regional economic cooperation. "The key to Bangladesh's growth and development is connectivity," he said. Greater cooperation with India, Bhutan and Nepal would open up the opportunities, he said,
adding that India has made a major concession in giving Bhutan and Nepal transit to Bangladesh. He said the visit would also give a huge push for Indian investment in Bangladesh.
Irene Khan, secretary general of Amnesty International, termed the prime minister's India visit "courageous".

"India is an economic power and we need to follow the tail end," she said. She, moreover, expressed sadness for hearing little about the opportunities that might be created by the visit.
Annisul Huq, president of the Federation of Bangladesh Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FBCCI),
expressed unhappiness over the lack of cooperation among South Asian countries despite its huge population. Under South Asian Free Trade Area (Safta), most of the products of Bangladesh, including apparels, get duty-free access but it is the non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that are creating obstacles, he said. He said, "It [NTB] looks small but the implications are much bigger." Citing an example he said Indian trucks can enter Bangladesh territory but Bangladeshi trucks cannot enter Indian territory. He said NTBs such as testing certificates and labelling also hinder the country's exports to India. {That is, because sir, there are environmental standards that every country put forth to protect its own interests, if BD cannot meet the standard Oiropean standards while India can, is it the blame of India?}
The president of the apex trade body also suggested that a committee be formed to address and resolve NTB issues. Anisuddowla, president of Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MCCI), blamed the policymakers for not analysing the full outcome of the agreements. India has been allowed to use Bangladesh's seaports, he said, adding, "We have nothing in our hand to negotiate the next time." {same standard cry you guys have been making for the last 40+ years, we have nothing in hand, we have nothing in hand

when you have a huge population in hand, why you even

against a Burma that is 1/3rd your population, you

against an India that has 7 times the population, you only dont

against a china that is 8 1/2 times your population despite the fact that the chinis sided with the pakis in 71, and they are screwing you far more in terms of business deals than India or Burma or the rest of the world put together can screw you. So much for intellect or common sense.}
Former adviser to a caretaker government CM Shafi Sami said a new horizon has opened through the visit. Prof Shahiduzzaman of Dhaka University said the prime minister's India visit has shifted the paradigm of Indo-Bangla relations, which has significant impacts on Bangladesh.
The visit proves that Bangladesh's foreign policy has become dynamic, he said, adding that the opposition of the parliament should consider the geopolitical position of the country. {but is nt that asking for the moon from morons?}
Referring to killing of Bangladeshis in the borders, former ambassador Ashfaque Ahmed said the issue has been a serious matter of concern but had been almost ignored during the visit. Harun-ur Rashid, former ambassador to UN, said there is hope that confusion over Bangladesh's relation with India has been removed with the PM's visit.
On trade gap between Bangladesh and India, he said trade deficit between China and Japan is much higher than that of these two countries, but the issue had not been discussed. "Opening up Mongla and Chittagong ports for India, Bhutan and Nepal in no way can be a security threat."
Regarding supporting India for its candidature to the UN Security Council, he said a country is selected regionally for such candidature. As china is already a member of the council, it may not like Bangladesh's support to India. Former ambassador Jamil Majid said having good relations with India did not mean that there would not be any problems in future. Therefore, the Indo-Bangla summit needed serious follow-ups if good results are to be achieved. “Success of the visit will actually depend on follow-ups,” he said.
Communist Party General Secretary Mujahidul Islam Selim said the prime minister's visit to India was very important and it should be considered as a step forward. “Mere joint communiqué would not bring any result for the country if we cannot seal agreements with India," Selim said, calling upon all not to make any sweeping comment on the outcome of the visit. Anisul Islam Mahmud, presidium member of Jatiya Party, congratulated Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina for her "bold step" to improve relation with India. He criticised the governments assumed power after the killing of Bangabandhu for their anti-India politics and misleading the people.
He also censured Reaz Rahman for his comment on the government's handing Ulfa leader Arabinda Rajkhowa over to India, which would be a threat to the security of Bangladesh. He also ruled out another allegation of the government making Bangladesh a market for India, saying, "It was BNP who made Bangladesh an open market for India during its regime in 1991-1996. {what is this? Jatiya Party siding with AL? what is going on here? Has HM Ershad's son decided to become dynamic in terms of the future course of JP?}
BNP standing committee member and former army chief Lt Gen (retd) Mahbubur Rahman said the visit was more beneficial to India. Problems relating to Indian insurgents would intensify through allowing India to use Mongla and Chittagong seaports, he said criticising the government for not holding discussions with the opposition party before the PM's India visit. National Press Club President Shawkat Mahmud said the PM's visit to India has certainly created a new era and would help build up confidence in India-Bangladesh relationships. He also accused the government for not informing the people about the agreements that would allow India to use Bangladesh's seaports and railway connectivity with Ashuganj prior to the visit. He also said the prime minister could not have public opinion on these issues before the visit and feared that severe political disagreement might arise in the country. {she got the overwhelming mandate in the election and it is not even a year down, so wtf are you farting genius?}
Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman also said the prime minister or the foreign minister could have discussed about the visit with Khaleda Zia as part of their bid for a national consensus on the issues. He blamed the government for giving confusing information about the visit. “We knew about signing of three agreements. But we did not have a clear idea about the use of ports by India, Bhutan and Nepal,” he added. Abdul Matlub Ahmed, president of Bangladesh-India Chamber of Commerce and Industry hoped that the India visit of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina would boost trade and investment in the country.
Executive Director of Centre for Policy Dialogue Prof Mustafizur Rahman, journalist Jaglul Ahmed Chowdhury, Director General of Bangladesh Institute for International and Strategic Studies Maj Gen Sk Munirul Islam, AL lawmaker Mostafa Faruk Mohammad and former ambassador Afsarul Qader were present at the discussion. The Daily Star Editor and Publisher Mahfuz Anam moderated the roundtable.