menon s wrote:Brihaspati wrote
Discovered that those are the ones who are really fettered. J&K is not going to be "solved" by vague, non-committed, ideologically befuddled - or worse, self-deluded and deceptively committed underneath to "anti-Hinduism" Indians. Such thinking will always play into the hands of imperialism.
Well i agree to differ with you. If something goes wrong in Pakistan it is that hinge on which Pakistan state depends on, in Iqbals words its " whenever any challenge came to Islam, it was not the muslims who helped overcome it but their religion called Islam" . And in India it is the belief that without Hinduism the region of India will loose its glory and will be engulfed in darkness" as quoted by Vivekananda.
What is your opinion? Do you think that India will not "loose(sic) its glory" and "will not be engulfed in darkness" without "Hinduism"? Since societies do not appear to live in an ideological vacuum, what are the alternative ideologies or faiths that you think are likely to replace and will more than compensate for the loss of "Hinduism"? This is not for J&K thread, but feel free to answer this in an appropriate thread.
Both put faith at its center and not the people. Hinduism is an open source code religion. It overcame barriers through its syncretism.
Another profound observation. Really, I have heard this so often - like "Marxism is true, because it is a science" [hopefully Marx turns in his grave to hear such a digestion of his logical claims]. Even "open source" codes have to follow a certain language, whose syntax is fixed [yes go down to its core engine, at some level you have to follow the basic "rules"]. What you dub "syncretism" was an attempt at doing a hybrid language - somewhat like writing wrapper classes to call code written in another language. Those who do this know very well, that it is a dangerous task, with strange and funny results and much information lost in translation. In the end, you do not have "syncretism" but a "hybrid" where each language keeps its distinct core. Moreover, from the other side - it was never acknowledged - and what they tried to do was erase the "wrapping" language itself and impose their own proprietary source code onlee.
Do you really think before you write? Can you list out how exactly you think "syncretism" worked and "overcame" which "barriers"? you can start with Kashmir itself - if you want - it would be great fun, I can promise!
And today it has to syncretise with the changing third wave economic structure to survive. Think about it very carefully, i did not want to put in examples so that theory becomes subjective. But i have enough to offer you.
I thought you were talking about "Hinduism" being "syncretic"? Do you mean now that "Hinduism" has to be "syncretic" with an "economic wave"? Or are you equating "India==Hinduism" - which as a nation has to be "syncretic"! It would be interesting if you put forward the "contradictory beliefs" that you think rule current economics - because "syncretism" by definition is about "melding contradictory beliefs". Some people have tried to say that "belief" in the ideological sense does not operate and should not operate in "economics". Why should examples make the theory "subjective"!
A nation slipped into colonialism because of traitors in the land. How else would an handful of English takeover India, without the connivance of the larger public, thats native? And traitors are created when there is a disconnect between the state and its people. Our role is to fill that disconnect.
Now, now, "nephew", it seems, you have a lot of catch up to do in studying the history of "how an(?) handful of English" took-over India, if you stick to the "traitor" theory. "Who" betrayed "whom"? See by that logic, Jinnah and his handful of ML-goons could take over two sizeable piece of real estate, you mean with the help of the "larger public" of the place? So the part of POK could be taken over only because of the connivance of the "larger public" of both sides of J&K! do you realize how many smoking and gaping holes you are burning in the "syncretic/oh-so-unified/Hindu-Muslim communal amity" theory peddled by the Centre-Left for more than 60 years?
"traitors" are created when there is a disconnect between state and its people - sure about this? Final answer?? Which state was disconnected from which people when the "handful of British" took -"over"? Who and what created that disconnect and why? Are you sure you would like to go into this discussion - even in the context of J&K history?
Calling names....thats the last refuge of a man who has nothing to argue, so you sleep tight uncle.
As I pointed out I did not call you names, but you have. I guess you do not yet have the maturity to know when you are throwing an insult.
