Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 19:58
by Lilo
anupmisra wrote:There are several levels of "pakidelusionalilty" (this should be a word). Here's one that exceeds the normal. The below "argument" builds a thesis for nuclear parity based on faulty assumptions and delusional fears. Stop me if you have heard this before.
Picture of the MotorHam commenting on Baki "Strategic affairs" who penned the above artecal .
Picture of another Motorham commenting on Baki strategic affairs and researching Musharrafization
This is another well known motorham commenting on Baki "Strategic affairs"
Whats with these weird poses and getups by Baki Motorham hain ?
all of them are dallying in strategic affairs and their pictures more often than not give heebi jeebies..
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 20:22
by CRamS
Atri wrote:
Rajdeep wrote:
Indian Army Chief answer to Pakistan Journalist.
He was the same guy who got his ass handed over to him by Javed Akhtar few years ago.
I like the Indian army chief's comments except that it sounded a bit defensive. Note the question by the shudh Paki RAPE (I am sure he is the TSP TFTA type who keep Christina Fair types happy during their "South Asia" postings ), on why India claims it is taking on China when all its troops are TSP centric. This is what hurts the ego of TSP RAPE a lot, even the perception that India is in a different league.
To that question, I felt Indian army chief was rambling around a bit on robustness of Indian democracy and all that crap. Instead, I would have liked a more direct answer. India faces a serious terrorist threat from TSP, and we know what TSPA strategy is in using these terrorists, and that is no small threat India faces, and hence needs to counter that. It would have also been a good segue to his earlier points on trust deficit etc. He could have then added that India also has other threats, and could have said something about China. Sure, such an answer might seem that Indian army chief is doing an equal equal, but so what. Just ignoring the TSP threat is not going to go away.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 22:19
by anupmisra
We pakis even treat our prisoners better than you evil yindoos. See how well we treat your fishermen:
The fishermen on either side have similar stories to tell about how they were arrested.
Yindoo prisoners in paki resorts:
The evil baniya and brahmin fishermen — unless they happen to be children in which case they are kept in the Youthful Offenders’ School adjacent to Karachi Central Prison — are sent to the District Prison Malir where they are kept in new and separate barracks and treated rather well
the Indian fishermen imprisoned here say they get to eat proper food
the Youthful Offenders’ School here where the young prisoners are expected to take lessons and learn some kind of a craft.
Recently, the Pakistan government took very good care of a young Indian fisherman suffering from brain abscess at the time of arrest. He was admitted to Civil Hospital and treated so well there by the doctors and nurses that at the time of his release he said that he wanted to become a doctor.
It is a sad reality that while Indian fishermen prisoners in Pakistani jails are released as soon as they have served their sentence
It’s a great moment of joy for the Indians when they are being released. They joke with the prison guards and are presented with new clothes and shoes by Legal Aid or any other NGO responsible for arranging transport for them right up to Wagah where they are then handed over to Indian authorities.
Meanwhile, muslimeen prisoners are kept in Yinddo black holes of Calcutta:
the Pakistani fishermen are not so fortunate. Most are sent to GIC Kutch Putch, a prison in Gujarat, India.
The children are also sent to regular prisons, kept with criminals and beaten up night and day. Some have even died in prison in India like Ibrahim Mallah of Keti Bunder in 2010 and Nawaz Ali Mohammad of Rehri Goth in 2012. The news about their death also reached here after several days and it took even longer, almost a month, to have their remains brought here.
those lucky enough to return alive from India, have terrible tales to narrate about their ordeal. “We were fed the thinnest watery curry with worms floating in it but it was either that or starve to death, so we ate,” said little Mir Mohammad of Thatta
Another recent returnee 16-year-old Asghar Ali says that they were made to sweep and scrub floors in GIC Kutch Putch
“The prison staff treated us like total criminals. They yelled and screamed at us day in and day out. ‘You are not here to attend your father’s wedding so you better work to earn your keep,’
One wonders about the fate of any Pakistani fisherman with any ailment under Indian imprisonment.
Pakistani fishermen in Indian jails... Some have been stuck there for as long as 13 to 14 years.
Shame on you, evil baniyas and brahmins.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 22:22
by arun
New Indian Express has an article titled “Pakistan understands only one language, turn it into a social and economic pariah”:
AHMEDABAD: Pakistan Marine Security Agency (PMSA) has seized nine Indian fishing boats and apprehended 55 fishermen off Jakhau coast near the international border, a fishermen's body claimed on Sunday.
"The PMSA intercepted nine fishing boats yesterday in the international waters off Jakhau coast near Jamnagar.
Fifty-five fishermen apprehended by the agency were sent to Karachi," National Fish Workers' Forum general secretary Manish Lodhari told PTI.
The boats were from Porbandar and the fishermen hailed from Gujarat, he said.
This is the second such incident within a week when Indian fishermen were taken away by PMSA.
Seventeen Indian fishermen were apprehended and as many fishing trawlers were seized by the Pakistani agency last Wednesday.
Incidentally, the Indian Coast Guard had, on March 9, arrested 21 Pakistani fishermen off Jakhau coast for illegally intruding into Indian waters and seized their three fishing trawlers.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 22:52
by RajeshA
We should seize Pakistani naval ships and boats in these waters, not Paki fishermen! Through continued and increasing detainment we put pressure on Pakistan to accept our version of sea borders. In fact we should start seizing Paki ships from waters than even we acknowledge are theirs.
If China can make claims on all of Indo-China Sea, then certainly India too can be aggressive on this front. After every incident, we can say, these things happen because Pakistan is not willing to demarcate the borders.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 23:33
by kish
Lilo wrote:
anupmisra wrote:There are several levels of "pakidelusionalilty" (this should be a word). Here's one that exceeds the normal. The below "argument" builds a thesis for nuclear parity based on faulty assumptions and delusional fears. Stop me if you have heard this before.
Picture of the MotorHam commenting on Baki "Strategic affairs" who penned the above artecal .
Whats with these weird poses and getups by Baki Motorham hain ?
all of them are dallying in strategic affairs and their pictures more often than not give heebi jeebies..
Reading these artical can be good entertainment.
for example read this excerpts from the above link:
According to nuclear analysts, for India to launch Cold Start, would be to “roll the nuclear dice”. It could trigger the world’s first use of nuclear weapons.
This "strategic expert" has never heard of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, i guess.
What is the qualification to become "Stragetic Expert" in pakisatan? 4th Class pass!
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 17 Mar 2013 23:34
by vishvak
More and more surveillance is needed in coastal areas perhaps with helicopter ops incorporated as well. The fishermen should be given some device to notify position and strength of pakbarians on sight. A fly past by fighter jets of Navy/Coast-Guard around areas in which the Indian fishermen are present could be great too for the fishermen!
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 00:03
by Prem
anupmisra wrote:There are several levels of "pakidelusionalilty" (this should be a word). Here's one that exceeds the normal. The below "argument" builds a thesis for nuclear parity based on faulty assumptions and delusional fears. Stop me if you have heard this before.
1. Pakistan accords the highest priority ensuring a foolproof nuclear security mechanism <and>
[
QED.
How do they do Fool-Proofing , Hain Ji ?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 00:20
by kish
Jhujar wrote:
How do they do Fool-Proofing , Hain Ji ?
cimple onlee. They will ask Rehman malik to find nuclear weapons. if this fool cannot find it, it is fool-proof onlee.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 00:21
by Narad
Seems like a worthless script of a cheap pakjabi movie.
Hussain Haqqani to be brought back forcibly if he returns not willingly: SC
Supreme Court (SC) has rejected Pakistan former ambassador to US Hussain Haqqani plea on exemption from attendance in the court and directed him to appear before it within 3 weeks.
he was informed that fool proof security would be provided to Hussain Haqqani after his arrival in Pakistan.
Helicopter will be provided to him on the route from airport to his hotel and his residence and all the areas will be kept under security blanket by security agencies, he stated.
Upon it the CJP remarked the security arrangements made by the government were appreciable.
Haqqani asks what serious situation has emerged that he is needed in the country, she added.
CJP observed “Hussain Haqqani had left the country after giving the affidavit that he would return within four week. A sufficient time has been elapsed now what to speak of 4 weeks that Hussain Haqqani is not returning. Hussain Haqqani should honor his affidavit and court’s order”.
“we have extended ample opportunity to Hussain Haqqani and we will give no more time to him. It is better for him if he returns to country. Democratic system is in place in the country. Institutions are functioning and no one should need to worry in this regard. Government is providing security as much as it can provide to him”.
“We have given opportunity repeatedly. If Hussain Haqqani thinks that court can do nothing then he is under some delusion. If Hussain Haqqani does not come back willingly then he will be brought back forcibly”, court remarked.
The fishermen on either side have similar stories to tell about how they were arrested.
Meanwhile, muslimeen prisoners are kept in Yinddo black holes of Calcutta:
the Pakistani fishermen are not so fortunate. Most are sent to GIC Kutch Putch, a prison in Gujarat, India.
The children are also sent to regular prisons, kept with criminals and beaten up night and day. Some have even died in prison in India like Ibrahim Mallah of Keti Bunder in 2010 and Nawaz Ali Mohammad of Rehri Goth in 2012. The news about their death also reached here after several days and it took even longer, almost a month, to have their remains brought here.
those lucky enough to return alive from India, have terrible tales to narrate about their ordeal. “We were fed the thinnest watery curry with worms floating in it but it was either that or starve to death, so we ate,” said little Mir Mohammad of Thatta
Another recent returnee 16-year-old Asghar Ali says that they were made to sweep and scrub floors in GIC Kutch Putch
“The prison staff treated us like total criminals. They yelled and screamed at us day in and day out. ‘You are not here to attend your father’s wedding so you better work to earn your keep,’
One wonders about the fate of any Pakistani fisherman with any ailment under Indian imprisonment.
Pakistani fishermen in Indian jails... Some have been stuck there for as long as 13 to 14 years.
Shame on you, evil baniyas and brahmins.
Anupji, farticle forgot about the incident of the ten fishermen who set sail from Krachi to Mumbai to get roles in Bollywood and their mistreat at the hands of evil Yindians. Nine of them were shot in execution style and not provided food, water and shelter and the tenth was hanged and the body not even returned to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 05:45
by anupmisra
RCase wrote:Anupji, farticle forgot about the incident of the ten fishermen who set sail from Krachi to Mumbai to get roles in Bollywood and their mistreat at the hands of evil Yindians. Nine of them were shot in execution style and not provided food, water and shelter and the tenth was hanged and the body not even returned to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Evil yindoo. Don't you realize that those ten becharas were in Bombay to attend their fathers' weddings?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Several Christian families fled their homes in Shibli Town on Friday in anticipation of a mob attack after accusations surfaced over the desecration of a mosque’s ablution area.
There are about 70 houses in the Christian locality of Shibli Town, where Naseer Ahmed, a prayer leader of Jamia Masjid Al Hajveri, accused a Christian boy of entering the mosque and urinating at the place designated for ablution purposes on Wednesday.
The prayer leader beat him, informed his father of his “crime”, and asked them to be ready for retribution after Friday prayers. As a result, some Christian families locked up their homes and fled from the area on Thursday. However, Pastor Waris Piara from Shibli Town, and other members of the community went to the prayer leader and sought his forgiveness, promising him that Christians would not ‘dare to enter the mosque’ in the future if he forgave them this time.
Can mullahs forgive blasphemers? What the hell is this?
This is not Islam. Pakistan means pure Islam.
I hope mullahs take right decision.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 06:39
by RamaY
Anujan wrote:That fellow thinks too much of himself and is an establishment man and a subversive. Please do not forget his role in the Praveen Swami episode. He is dangerous and disruptive and above all an A-hole. He cant ask any of these questions to his own General, he would be found dead in a ditch. We are entertaining him and subjecting our Generals to the insult of replying to some of his pig squeals. He has the gall to throw around the accusation that IA is somehow threatening the Government and somehow lying to the country. He also insinuates that without IA, India and Pakistan would have had peace by solving problems like Siachen.
Very true.
It is the Paid Media that is creating such encounters putting national leaders against the terrorists. Unfortunately this paid media is sponsored and instigated by the Congress-system for electoral gains.
Burkha Dutt alone has conducted at least 3 debates on AFSPA past two weeks in NDTV and they are trying to create a facade of national debate before rubbing political decisions on the nation.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
CURIOUS story in a local English daily caught my eye the other day. It seemed the Sri Lanka Muslim Council had given in to demands that meat could be sold without halal certification. This is a huge success for radical Buddhist groups who have been orchestrating an anti-Muslim campaign for the last few years.
Mosques have been attacked, prayers disrupted, and Muslims in general accused of being anti-state. The Muslim Tamil National Alliance has written to the Secretary General of the United Nations, asking him for protection, and protesting against this nasty campaign.
Leading the anti-Muslim charge is a group called the Bodu Bela Sena, or Buddhist Force. Headed by ultra-nationalistic monks, the group follows a xenophobic agenda of “Sri Lanka for the Buddhists”. Of late, Buddhist monks have begun playing a growing and retrogressive role in the island’s politics.
The monks first flexed their muscles to shore up the Rajapakse government’s resolve to crush the Tamil insurgency. First, they blocked any possibility of compromise by offering the Tamil Tigers greater autonomy. To build up pressure, they formed a political party and won enough seats to take a place in the coalition government.Then, when President Mahinda Rajapakse’s brother, defence secretary Gotabaya, was facing difficulties in finding enough recruits for the army, a group of monks fanned out across the Buddhist areas to motivate thousands of young men. These recruits were assured that they would not lose karma by fighting and killing in a war as they would be doing so in the cause of Buddhism.The brutal civil war ended nearly four years ago in a bloodbath that is now the subject of intense scrutiny and criticism from abroad. The ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Commission at Geneva is about to vote on a resolution initiated by the US, demanding an international investigation into the fate of tens of thousands of Tamils said to be killed in the last days of the fighting in the north of the island.Against this backdrop, it is odd that the government is doing so little to clamp down on the anti-Muslim campaign. Should it gain support and traction, the results could be very bad news. Muslims are mostly concentrated in three areas: in and around Galle and Colombo, and in the coastal areas of the north-east. The latter are mostly poor fishermen, while urban Muslims are heavily represented in business and the professions.According to unofficial reports, the 2011 census indicates that Muslims form around 10 per cent of the total population of 21.4 million. This is a substantial increase from the 7.6 pc in the last census. One reason the new census figures have not been officially released is said to be the disquiet the increase in the number of Muslims might cause among the majority. number of Muslim families in Galle and Matra pride themselves on their descent from Arab traders who settled in Sri Lanka centuries ago. Others have come from the Indian coast. There is a small and wealthy Bohra community in Colombo. Many northern Muslims descended from Malays who settled along the coast.
Thus, Sri Lankan Muslims represent an ethnic mix who have helped in creating prosperity and diversity. So far, at least, they have got along well with their neighbours. However, despite centuries of living together, integration has been slow. Like most minorities, Muslims tend to stick together, maintaining their dress code and diet. Women usually wear some form of hijab, and many Muslim men wear beards and skull caps.Even liberal Sinhalese accuse Muslims of not keeping their streets clean, and generally staying aloof from the mainstream.One theory is that the triumphant Sinhalese fringe elements on the extreme right need a fresh target for their xenophobia. Some in the business community are eyeing the assets of their successful Muslim competitors. Politicians are seeking to tap into the strong sense of Buddhist identity that was pumped up during the last stages of the war. The recent execution of a young Sri Lankan maid in Saudi Arabia on flimsy charges provided more ammunition to the extremists
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
No. The lesson is not in the way Sri Lanka deals with it, but in the way Muslims in minority start the "you farted at me" fight by saying "Muslims under threat" That statement is always a "first shot" across the bow of kafirs to tell them that Muslims are soon going to organize and become violent unless they are given their own little Pakshitstan. It started with Jinnah in India. It is merely continuing everywhere else.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 09:13
by partha
It is amazing how Pakis are concerned about Muslims all over the world while not doing a thing to set right their own country. It just amazes me always.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 09:23
by shiv
partha wrote:It is amazing how Pakis are concerned about Muslims all over the world while not doing a thing to set right their own country. It just amazes me always.
It must be an Islamic characteristic since Pakistan is Islam. Pakis always claim Islamic causes so how can we say that only "Pakistanis" are like that. If Pakistan represents Islam, then Pakistan represents Islam and what Pakistan does is Islamic. What happens in Pakistan is Islamic. No?
I would like to see even one Pakshitistani deny in public that Pakistan is NOT Islamic and Pakistan does not represent Islam and Muslims.
I the whole wide world with 1.2 billion Muslims - only one man, one single man - the boss of the Ajmer Shrine has had the guts to say Pakistan is not Islamic. The rest of the world's Muslims probably agree with Pakistan, because they don't protest.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 09:26
by disha
Islam was born in 1947.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 09:30
by Prem
disha wrote:Islam was born in 1947.
In 47 and in Pakistan. This fact was latter endorsed by Prophert Muhamamd's promise to Qadri to reside in Pakistan. Listen to the grateness of Pakistan,
.Sufi Barkat Ali Prediction about Pakistan . Pakistan ki Haan orrr Naa me tamama e Aalaam/Duniya ke faisle hua karenge
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 09:49
by Prem
dont Miss this retard, Inbreeding signs on the face dropping like dead flies.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:05
by partha
shiv wrote:
partha wrote:It is amazing how Pakis are concerned about Muslims all over the world while not doing a thing to set right their own country. It just amazes me always.
It must be an Islamic characteristic since Pakistan is Islam. Pakis always claim Islamic causes so how can we say that only "Pakistanis" are like that. If Pakistan represents Islam, then Pakistan represents Islam and what Pakistan does is Islamic. What happens in Pakistan is Islamic. No?
I would like to see even one Pakshitistani deny in public that Pakistan is NOT Islamic and Pakistan does not represent Islam and Muslims.
Saar, Since Pakistan claims Muslims are being persecuted in India, I had once proposed an idea of infiltrating track 2 group and calling for Pakistan to allow free migration of Muslims from India to Pakistan. Since they show concern and outrage about Muslims in India and elsewhere probably they should do something more than writing articles and issuing statements.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:05
by disha
Jhujar wrote:
disha wrote:Islam was born in 1947.
In 47 and in Pakistan. ...
No Jhujar ji. Islam was born in 1947. Pakistan ka matlab kya? La illah ill allah. <period>
Pakistan is islam and islam is Pakistan. Islam was born in 1947. Precisely 14 August 1947. And by 3.5 fathers.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:08
by disha
partha wrote:....calling for Pakistan to allow free migration of Muslims from India to Pakistan. Since they show concern and outrage about Muslims in India and elsewhere probably they should do something more than writing articles and issuing statements....
You hindu terrorist for suggesting the impossible on behalf of masli cysts. Which muslim with common sense will voluntarily go to Bakistan? Even Kashmiris do not want to go there. All want to come to India, and still keep their H&D intact.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:14
by partha
disha wrote:
You hindu terrorist
Step number 1: Become a part of track 2. Now I am secular and progressive onlee who cares for South Asia.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:37
by disha
partha wrote:
disha wrote:
You hindu terrorist
Step number 1: Become a part of track 2. Now I am secular and progressive onlee who cares for South Asia.
Oh you mean track pee. Than you are all good. But the moment you say free one way flow for masli cysts from kuffarland to bakistan, you will be branded and put back on Step number 0.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 10:46
by partha
disha wrote:
you will be branded and put back on Step number 0.
Not if I have a history of articles calling Modi a demon, maut ka saudagar and what not. And my views about Siachen & Sir Creek being low hanging fruits which India can give away for greater peace in South Asia should help establish my credibility.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
ISLAMABAD, March 17: Reports from officials at the International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI) suggest that the presidency of Dr Ahmed Yousif Al-Draiweesh, who can speak neither Urdu nor English, has been marked by language problems, cultural differences, and irregularities that have increased mistrust and suspicion between the university management and faculty.
The language barrier was the most pressing problem cited. “There are around 23,000 students in the university,” one official said, “most of whom cannot communicate with the president at all.”
Faculty members have also claimed to be affected, noting that those faculty who speak his native Arabic have “managed to get close” to him, a position from which they can influence policy.
University spokesman Hairan Khattak confirmed the president’s language difficulties, but said they had caused no problems. Others seemed unconvinced.
One official, requesting anonymity, recounted a disturbing situation that took place around two weeks ago. “Dr Draiweesh attended a lecture and began to suspect that the professor was speaking in Urdu,” a fact which was later confirmed.
“Because IIUI policy is that teachers must lecture in either English or Arabic, Dr Draiweesh issued instructions to terminate the teacher.”
Eventually, “it was revealed that the professor was a member of the MS Urdu faculty, and was giving a lecture on that subject – which cannot be taught in any other language.” After what the official described as “a long discussion,” the professor was allowed to keep his position at the university.
Spokesman Hairan Khattak told Dawn that it was the president’s prerogative to “remove or transfer any person if he feels that they are not working in the best interests of the university.”
Dr Al-Draiweesh’s lack of fluency in English and Urdu has required the presence of “at least five” interpreters or translators, whose salaries are drawn from university funds.
“They translate every letter written to him, and they communicate on his behalf,” another official said. “But they translate for their own interests and have become very powerful.”
He mentioned that a written complaint of sexual harassment was filed against one faculty member, a former member of the Academic Staff Association. “The interpreters like [this professor], so we couldn’t take any action against him.”
According to Dr Mohammad Iqbal, a former vice chancellor of Punjab University, effective administration requires communication. “If the president can’t understand his teachers and students,” he asked, “how can he convey instructions to them, how can he guide them?”
He suggested, however, that this problem was larger than Dr Al-Draiweesh, and symptomatic of a larger problem with education in Pakistan.
Cultural differences have also marked Dr Al-Draiweesh’s decisions. One official mentioned the case of a hostel provost whom a group of students accused of “watching a movie on the Internet, which is a minor crime in Pakistan; for one complaint, he should have received a warning.”
Because the crime is more serious in Saudi Arabia, Dr Al-Draiweesh removed the provost from his position.
Similarly, termination proceedings were initiated against the director of the university’s finance wing, who is male, because he spoke to a female employee.
“The same thing happened to the director of human resources,” the official said. “He’s been working here for the last 30 years but he was declared guilty of talking to a female employee. Now he’s facing problems and might be terminated.”
Another university official alleged that IIUI management had proposed bringing new faculty members from Al-Imam Mohamed Ibn Saud Islamic University in Saudi Arabia.
Although Al-Draiweesh claims they will receive salaries from IMISI, “they’ll still get allowances and benefits from IIUI,” the official said, before noting that there were qualified persons in Pakistan who could have been hired instead.
Dr Al-Draiweesh’s own elevation to the position raised questions as well. Although presidency of IIUI was vacated in December 2010, when Dr Anwar Hussain Saddiqui retired from the position, it was not until 2012 that then Rector Professor Fateh Mohammad Malik advertised for candidates.
Around 50 applied, and in February, a search committee short-listed three of them. In October of that year, however, Dr Al-Draiweesh was appointed president.
“The search committee had formed, discussed candidates, short-listed them, interviewed them,” said an official from the administration wing. “Dr Al-Draiweesh’s name wasn’t even there.”
What? Pakistan has cultural differences with Arabia? I thought Pakistanis were Arabs
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 11:29
by RajeshG
Atri wrote:
Rajdeep wrote:
Indian Army Chief answer to Pakistan Journalist.
He was the same guy who got his ass handed over to him by Javed Akhtar few years ago.
I actually like Wajahat, his interviews are a joy to watch. Way better then some of the Barkha/Sagarika/Rajdeep/Arnab cr@p. Always asks really probing questions and gives full opportunity for the other person to either come out really good or make a complete ass of themselves. Gen Singh came out really good - his reference to "profession of arms" & "beheading is not done" was awesome. Congrats to both Wajahat and Gen Singh.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
PESHAWAR: Two blasts took place in the judicial complex in Peshawar on Monday, reported Express News.
At least two people have died and 23 have been injured.
A suicide bomber first threw a grenade in the court room of additional sessions judge Kulsoom Azam, before blowing himself up.
A second bomber was shot dead by security forces and the suicide jacket was defused by bomb disposal squad. Each bomber had six kilogrammes of explosives and four kilogrammes of ball bearings.
The dead and injured have been shifted to Lady Reading Hospital.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 15:05
by Philip
Why isn't the US,self-styled champion of human rights and democracy,not taking up the issue of Christian/minorities bashing in Pak and instead going after the Sri Lankans who put down the world's worst terror outfit that was far more deadly than Al Q? Aren't the Paki minorities equally at risk and have been persecuted as much as Lankan Tamils have been? Isn't the persecution of Paki minorities "genocide"? Why are there no sanctions against Pak,why no outraged "Christian" entities in the US or EJs protesting or campaigning against Paki genocide?
Why the heck doesn't O-Bomb-er see the situ in Pak for what it is-a travesty of human rights in the epi-centre of global terror.Or is he conveniently turning a Nelsonian eye to it all?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Ehsanullah said that the Pakistani nation has ridden itself of the tyrant 5-year-old rule of the so-called democratic forces today and are now free
You are free. One again! Your are free to go to your out houses and your pakhanas. Free to murder your minorities as and when you please. You are free to run to the hills of Swat and fire your AKs in the air at any given time and that has nothing to do with the business of the state (or something like that).
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 16:57
by shiv
Philip wrote:
Why the heck doesn't O-Bomb-er see the situ in Pak for what it is-a travesty of human rights in the epi-centre of global terror.
How dare you call a Nobel peace prize winner by that name?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 20:08
by RamaY
Did Musharraf land in Pakistan?
oops it is on 3/24
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Islamabad: Pakistan's Supreme Court on Monday ordered the indictment of former interior minister Rehman Malik for contempt of court for interfering in a probe into alleged corruption in a state-run steel firm, after rejecting his mercy plea.
Last month, Malik had submitted an unconditional written apology and sought mercy from the court.
The Chief Justice observed today that the apology was tantamount to a confession and it was up to the court to accept it or not.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 22:59
by Prem
disha wrote:
Jhujar wrote:Islam was born in 1947.In 47 and in Pakistan. ...No Jhujar ji. Islam was born in 1947. Pakistan ka matlab kya? La illah ill allah. <period>
Pakistan is islam and islam is Pakistan. Islam was born in 1947. Precisely 14 August 1947. And by 3.5 fathers.
Bengali legft islam in 1971. Balochi are almost half way out. Sindhi are struggling to leave Islam and Pathans had enough of it.
Pakistani jahannum mey Bahut Joote Khayye
Torn Mush sey Dard Shaha Nahi Jayee
Allah Jaane Kya Hogga agge ,
Maula Jaane Kya Hogga agge.
Others see the razing of Joseph Colony as evidence of a far wider malaise. "Pakistan is hostile to all non-Muslims. That is a simple, cold truth. The laws are discriminatory and the pious population does not like the non-believers either," lawyer and columnist Saroop Ijaz wrote this week.
"The scenes of Joseph Colony are the real 'image' of Pakistan. The least we can do is to be honest as we remain bystanders to slaughter and await our turn."
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 23:04
by vishvak
shiv wrote:
Philip wrote:
Why the heck doesn't O-Bomb-er see the situ in Pak for what it is-a travesty of human rights in the epi-centre of global terror.
How dare you call a Nobel peace prize winner by that name?
For bakis, protesting against Nobel prize winner and US Prez obama, burning effigies is not unique even. Be it a border incident near Afghanistan or drone strikes on caves or some arbitrary B-grade movie, bakis are quick to be aggrieved by Nobel prize winner.