Re: Understanding the US - Again
Posted: 01 Feb 2025 23:38
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
A constant and childish obsession with one or other group or program within USA (sometimes "dumbocrats", other times "deep state", sometimes "DEI") prevents any sort of "mature adult" discussion or understanding.bala wrote: ↑01 Feb 2025 09:59Chetak ji,
This is the same thinking of US expanding NATO upto Russian borders. This caused the Ukraine - Russia war. The lies / fabrication within Ukraine by US Victoria Nuland and company in ukraine revolution is another cause for the US to get involved. The Dumbocrats perpetuated this line of thinking causing millions of Ukrainians/Russians to die and be displaced. This is another needless war causing turmoil in the world and the high inflation of oil/goods. The dumbocrats in 4 yrs have caused 100+% inflation of day to day consumable items + food for the average american joe. DJT has claimed that the previous Biden admin had lunatics thinking of WW-III and nuclear war with Russia.
Jay gaaru, now do Kash Patel. This is what Wikipedia - your go to source yet unreliable as heck - says about him.
Kashyap Pramod Vinod Patel[1][2] (born February 25, 1980) is an American lawyer, former federal prosecutor and official, and conspiracy theorist.![]()
![]()
He served as a National Security Council official, chief of staff to the acting U.S. secretary of defense, and senior advisor to the acting director of national intelligence, all during the first presidency of Donald Trump. In November 2024, President-elect Trump nominated Patel to succeed Christopher Wray as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Code: Select all
It seems wikipedia isn't even attempting to create the veneer that it is an apolitical, fact based source. Briandrewdrew (talk) 02:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Correct. Wikipedia is nowhere near reality. They should have just stuck with movie articles and basic pop culture. They can't even get the ABBA page done right. Good grief! 2600:1700:9F90:2EA0:986B:ABB8:6062:F40E (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC) If either of you want to improve the article by pointing out biased sources, or statements in the article that are wrong [and] providing a source for why you think they are wrong], that would be great. Other, you're not really helping. (See fake news.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Maybe if they just eliminated all the anonymously sourced "facts" and quotes from clearly left-leaning publications' opinion articles (again, without attribution), it might have some level of credibility. Oh, and if you need to have specific passages pointed out, you are part of the problem (deception and deceitful propaganda), and not helpful to dissemination of truth. Rickerwill (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC) The trending political pages on Wikipedia are run and tightly locked down by a handful of moderators with an agenda. If you peruse the talk pages on certain politicians' entries, you'll see what I mean. 2601:447:D185:3340:BC3E:22EF:E6F0:DFB0 (talk) 05:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC) Can't rely on Wikipedia for unbiased background information any longer. 4.34.75.244 (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC) The fact that he had some of the highest intel positions and it's overshadowed by him being a "Conspiracy theory pusher" says all you need to know about how biased Wikipedia is. 2601:603:700:4D10:85A0:22D6:CCFE:7C73 (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Agree 2600:1005:A126:95E6:9B28:971A:C721:DB73 (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Don't Chinese have a bee in their bonnet regarding Falun Gong?Patel promoted multiple pro-Trump conspiracy theories and appeared on podcasts hosted by far-right personalities such as Stew Peters[53] and co-hosted a talk show on The Epoch Times, a far-right Falun Gong-affiliated media organization.
Interesting wording that.Patel is the author of a 2022 children's picture book, titled The Plot Against the King, which falsely argues that the Steele dossier was used as evidence to initiate the investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.[55][56]
PGurus is mostly BS, as others have observed. His only saving grace is the Monday appearances of Rajagopalan who at least has real connections in the sarkar and provides fairly credible (though sometimes embellished) info.
Historically most of them are. The opposition party obviously will ask a lot of questions.
I don't know sir ji. kash patel comes across as trumps dance monkey...but he's not the worst out there and an hindu...he should be good to go.
"Jay" - Trump, by default, only requires dance monkeys under him. So that is not a distinguishing factor from the rest of the nominees/appointees.
Not surprising considering that Trump himself is a great monkey (look at his hair) and puts up show for his followers.
RCase wrote: ↑01 Feb 2025 00:33 The ATC had informed the helo of approaching traffic and he acknowledged the message. There was probably a mistaken identification of another aircraft by the helo pilot (but this aircraft was in the opposite direction and not on the landing approach). I believe the paths of the aircraft and the helo were about perpendicular to each other. The weather being clear and visibility being reasonable, the helo pilot should have been able to see incoming traffic while crossing the landing approach path and taken evasive action.
The question I have is that this was a black hawk helo and must have had sophisticated radar to show aircraft in the vicinity. Also probably would have had collision avoidance systems. I think the more likely reason for the air crash is helicopter pilot error.
Former Blackhawk pilot here. I’ll try to describe it for you.
Imagine you are looking at the world through toilet paper tubes, and everything is just different shades of green and black, with stars and ground lights hard to differentiate and aircraft lights that look the same as those.
Then you have 3 different radio frequencies going off in your ears.
Then you’re trying to navigate without any peripheral vision.
And you’re trying to keep the aircraft under control.
And you are trying to keep watch for all traffic, not just one plane. Because there are several in the sky at once and you’re tying to mentally keep track of all of them.
And you get distracted for like 5 seconds or your focus goes elsewhere, like your instructor pilot asking you a question about airspace regulations.
Boom. You’re all dead. Flying these machines is really tough, and the airspace and NVGs make it a heck of a lot tougher.
You’re welcome. Aviation is really difficult, and I’ve lost many friends in accidents like this.
My opinion is contrary to yours, so You don't need to react to my posts, just not required since I don't share your perspective on the things that are happening in the US.
Sorry, she is one of the worst garbage dumbocratic senators in the US. Never understood any of her stances. I am all for Elon Musk to slash away the rot in the US administration system. So many useless people clogging the system. I wish BJP has a DOGE equivalent and clears out the rubbish people in Govt of India.most detailed and sensible proposal I have seen is from a Dem senator:
https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media ... 0years.pdf
Chetak saar,
bala wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 09:46Chetak saar,
One of the rules of commercial aviation is that they are assigned a flight path corridor/channel to descend. This is preset and ready to land. If the runway is busy they ask the flight to circle around. Once the plane is on descend it needs to precisely reduce altitude and be ready to touch the runway, so many things need to come into place for precise landing.
Having a Helo cut across perpendicular to runway is not done usually. Tis very strange to have a helo cut across a commercial flight path corridor. This is a huge 101 basic mistake. The helo probably was stationed somewhere parallel to the runway. Why can't it follow its own corridor/channel parallel flight path. After attaining altitude it can then correct for direction which is again assigned by flight control. These are all basics and 101 type things.
Chetak saar, yes, yes, you are right, will wait for the report to reveal the extenuating circumstances.
Accidents do happen and I am not diminishing the fact. It is understandable when weather, visibility, ATC error, craft malfunction, combat exercises etc. can be a factor that leads to an accident. In this case that is not so. it is good weather and visibility. No craft malfunction or incorrect ATC instructions.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 08:42 Former Blackhawk pilot here. I’ll try to describe it for you.
Imagine you are looking at the world through toilet paper tubes, and everything is just different shades of green and black, with stars and ground lights hard to differentiate and aircraft lights that look the same as those.
Then you have 3 different radio frequencies going off in your ears.
Then you’re trying to navigate without any peripheral vision.
And you’re trying to keep the aircraft under control.
And you are trying to keep watch for all traffic, not just one plane. Because there are several in the sky at once and you’re tying to mentally keep track of all of them.
And you get distracted for like 5 seconds or your focus goes elsewhere, like your instructor pilot asking you a question about airspace regulations.
Boom. You’re all dead. Flying these machines is really tough, and the airspace and NVGs make it a heck of a lot tougher.
You’re welcome. Aviation is really difficult, and I’ve lost many friends in accidents like this.
Chetak ji - just some clarifications.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 10:11
and perhaps not all of them speaking the same ATC lingo in terms of interpreting ATC instructions
> That is not true. The lingo is standard. (Even if the pilot speaks in a foreign accent). It is meant to be precise and the instruction needs to be acknowledged.
the blackhawk was being flown with NVGs (usual for night flying) and that is a whole new scenario, one that is not commonly understood by most civilian ATC guys
> it is not the ATC guys responsibility of what technology you are using. In this case, they are quite familiar with military aircraft in this corridor. The lingo used for visual separation request by the helo and granted by the ATC means the helo is totally responsible. They were advised by ATC of the incoming flight.
crossing traffic is very routine for that airpoThrt. There are very important govt offices on the other side, the kind that works 24X7
The inquiry report will become public in some months
This airport has restrictions, rules of its own, peppered with restricted no go mil areas where overflight is not permitted
> This stuff is pretty well documented for each airport for airspace classification. Also, the instructor pilot should have definitely known about this.
Its a complicated situation where, without knowing the restrictions, and understanding the local scenario, making judgements would be fruitless. IMO, there was no doubt that it was a recipe for disaster, an accident looking for a place to happen but the very foundation of all MIL flying is just that.
Best to drop it until more info becomes available
Any which way one looks at it, it was a sad accident that shouldn't have ever taken place, after all, there was nothing out of the way that made the day of the accident stand out from any other day there
Even counting the sh!thole airports of Texas, DCA takes the cake when it comes to flight hazards and ATC quality. Case studies have been done and near-misses documented. Nothing much changed. Ironic since this is a key airport for sarkari-related travel.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 09:54
No one is going to do that, vera_k saar. That airport is vital to the govt
The operations at that airport continues almost without a break even after the accident.
There was some talk about a single ATC person (it is said that usually there are two) manning the tower with a myriad of duties that they had to simultaneously handle
It was one of those moments where the holes in the swiss cheese lined up perfectly.
RCase wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 10:35Accidents do happen and I am not diminishing the fact. It is understandable when weather, visibility, ATC error, craft malfunction, combat exercises etc. can be a factor that leads to an accident. In this case that is not so. it is good weather and visibility. No craft malfunction or incorrect ATC instructions.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 08:42 Former Blackhawk pilot here. I’ll try to describe it for you.
Imagine you are looking at the world through toilet paper tubes, and everything is just different shades of green and black, with stars and ground lights hard to differentiate and aircraft lights that look the same as those.
Then you have 3 different radio frequencies going off in your ears.
Then you’re trying to navigate without any peripheral vision.
And you’re trying to keep the aircraft under control.
And you are trying to keep watch for all traffic, not just one plane. Because there are several in the sky at once and you’re tying to mentally keep track of all of them.
And you get distracted for like 5 seconds or your focus goes elsewhere, like your instructor pilot asking you a question about airspace regulations.
Boom. You’re all dead. Flying these machines is really tough, and the airspace and NVGs make it a heck of a lot tougher.
You’re welcome. Aviation is really difficult, and I’ve lost many friends in accidents like this.
Firstly, there have not been MANY accidents like this with a direct collision between a helicopter and commercial jet near a civilian airport.
If the airman was inexperienced in handling the craft with NVG and mentally immature to handle multiple inputs in a crowded airspace, then he has no business training in this crowded commercial airspace. First he needs to get acquainted flying with NVG. By the way the approaching aircraft's landing lights would have been the brightest thing that he would have been able to see. (It was visible from a video shot from the airport).
Secondly, what about the judgement of the instructors? They should be well aware of flying with NVG and multiple radio frequencies (wouldn't that be true for the commercial pilots too?). From the video posted earlier, the communication from the ATC is pretty clear and the helo pilot acknowledged with a visual separation.
Sometimes it is amazing with the BS thought process. NVG technology is supposed to be an enhancement to regular vision. If you can see things in plain sight, why use convoluted technology that is a hindrance, especially if it does not allow you to differentiate stars from aircraft lights? I wonder what these guys would do in a battle situation where there could be multiple craft in closer proximity. Will they complain of getting blinded by gunshots fired from the ground?
Complaining of overload of mentally keeping track of all crafts in the airspace is another specious argument. The commercial pilots also have the same problem. ATC is keeping track of all the traffic too. A modern helicopter like the Black Hawk must have radar to to display the crafts in the vicinity. In a battle situation, it would be far more chaotic and understandable with tracking enemy fire, other aircraft flying in unpredictable formations.
In my opinion, the crew of the black hawk is primarily responsible, especially the instructor pilot not being capable of taking proper precautions and heeding the warning of the ATC. He must have had enough experience flying with NVG and all the other overload factors that are made as excuses.
RCase wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 11:12Chetak ji - just some clarifications.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 10:11
and perhaps not all of them speaking the same ATC lingo in terms of interpreting ATC instructions
> That is not true. The lingo is standard. (Even if the pilot speaks in a foreign accent). It is meant to be precise and the instruction needs to be acknowledged.
the blackhawk was being flown with NVGs (usual for night flying) and that is a whole new scenario, one that is not commonly understood by most civilian ATC guys
> it is not the ATC guys responsibility of what technology you are using. In this case, they are quite familiar with military aircraft in this corridor. The lingo used for visual separation request by the helo and granted by the ATC means the helo is totally responsible. They were advised by ATC of the incoming flight.
crossing traffic is very routine for that airpoThrt. There are very important govt offices on the other side, the kind that works 24X7
The inquiry report will become public in some months
This airport has restrictions, rules of its own, peppered with restricted no go mil areas where overflight is not permitted
> This stuff is pretty well documented for each airport for airspace classification. Also, the instructor pilot should have definitely known about this.
Its a complicated situation where, without knowing the restrictions, and understanding the local scenario, making judgements would be fruitless. IMO, there was no doubt that it was a recipe for disaster, an accident looking for a place to happen but the very foundation of all MIL flying is just that.
Best to drop it until more info becomes available
Any which way one looks at it, it was a sad accident that shouldn't have ever taken place, after all, there was nothing out of the way that made the day of the accident stand out from any other day there
Reid J. Epstein and Shane Goldmacher of The New York Times introduces us to the new chair of the Democratic National Committee, Minnesota DFL chair Ken Martin.
Mr. Martin defeated seven other candidates, including his top rival, Ben Wikler, the energetic chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Mr. Wikler’s base of support came from the party’s biggest donors and institutional players in Washington, including Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries, both of New York, and Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the former House speaker.
Mr. Martin won comfortably, with 246.5 votes to Mr. Wikler’s 134.5.
Late Friday, Mr. Wikler disclosed that his financial backers had included the billionaire Reid Hoffman and George Soros’s political action committee, both of which gave him $250,000.
Chetak ji, I heard/read in a few Tv channels/X posts (one Cynical Publius does a good job - a vet) that this particular Blackhawk model is not equipped with a black box nor does it have autopilot. Also the pilot was assigned to Whitehouse as a social aide. It seems all her SM posts have been deleted. This seems to be standard practice if the family requests it. It is still up in the air as to whether DEI had indirectly had any effect on this accident. DEI is in both ATC recruitment as well as in the pilot recruitment. She seems to have had only 500 hours of flight time which is not all that much. But then there they are supposed to go through this training at this busy airport. Anybody who is assigned to the WHOTUS might have to do it in real life under pressure if an emergency arises while they are on duty. So they have to train the folks under actual conditions. Just some controlled exercises won't do obviously since no wargames can simulate the real battlefield/emergency conditions.chetak wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025 12:03 Why such focus on the helo, which was, like the CRJ involved, on a lawful preplanned flight, duly cleared by ATC for height, heading and destination. While the CRJ involved is mandated by law to have a TCAS, the blackhawk (I could be wrong) may not have been so equipped.