2021 Strategic and Political Analysis-1

Aditya_V · Post by **Aditya_V** » 10 Feb 2022 08:20

I have note on the Hijab controversy, States Ruled by Secular Parties before the Assembly elections must impose a 2 day Hijab day. All Media, Government, School and College women Staff, Teachers and Students above 14 must wear Hijab for 2 days with Muslim men appointed in Vice and Virtue department with wipes to discipline them. Similarly these vice and Virtue men outside Clubs, Bars etc

If people are voting for so called Liberal secularism, let them feel what they are voting for.

This is how district by District 40% of Subcontinent now has blasphemy laws. With many groups cheering the Islamists letting the few brave take the fall.

Like the Sindhi, Punjabi and Bengali Hindu (some of them not all) lost their homeland due to this Secularism and now preaching we are one people. We can never be one people with countries with Official Religions and dont have atleast 10% of population with a different religion, no country without 15% people following a different religion

Sachin · Post by **Sachin** » 10 Feb 2022 08:56

Three-judge full bench of Karnataka High Court to hear hijab pleas today
One of the judges on the bench Ms. Justice Khazi Jaibunnisa Mohiuddin itself is not wearing a hijab/burqah. While that being the case; how can it be mandated that this is a mandatory religious requirement? I feel the uniform/dress code of the judiciary itself should be taken up as a point in argument. Certain areas have certain dress codes. And as seen in this image the protestors are not wearing hijab any more but the shuttle cock burqas.

Hijab controversy: More to do with UP than Karnataka? Is it entirely a coincidence that Owaisi has brought the hijab issue to the UP elections? - The report insinuates that Owaisi may be working on behalf of BJP

.

sanjaykumar · Post by **sanjaykumar** » 10 Feb 2022 08:57

Sharia should be recognised as the de facto legal codex for all Muslims in India. That should include everything from bank interest to witness requirements in rape cases, strictures against fraternizing with non Muslims, education in madrasas. Of course chopping of hands and stoning of the usual miscreants.

I personally would not extend these liberties to include pedophilia or marriages of minors. But whatever turns on their god. Muslims have every right to live in the seventh century. I really don’t see why Hindus, Christians or Martians should object.

Why don’t Hindus look to their poor, uneducated, downtrodden before going off to save world?

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 10 Feb 2022 09:50

The minority rights now are weapon against Hindus. They slowly became super citizens. Particularly after RTE. Unfortunately BJP not seriously looking into that legal and constitutional inequality. One way to level the field is the given constitutional rights to Hindus same as minorities. If Hindus fail thereafter create their own institutions then it will be their problem.

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 10:17

when kerala court can dismiss the hajib row why is it in Karnataka it is so afraid to take this stand?
since Kamath has brought quran let me ask a question based on quran

Sahih International Quran 33.59: O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.

a) does this mean Muslim women be identified and left but kafir can be abused?
b) does this aayath give permission to Muslim men to abuse kafir as they are not in hijab, so will court allow it to?
c) is it not for identification which is against the sprit of uniform? we need uniform to stop discrimination between rich/poor, religion, cast etc.

vimal · Post by **vimal** » 10 Feb 2022 10:55

^^ A few years ago Kerela education institute issued similar order. No problem there as it was run by peacefuls.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... BpvdI.html

The Muslim Educational Society (MES), a Kerala-based progressive outfit which runs around 150 educational institutions in the state and the Middle-East, issued a circular on Thursday banning the hijab which covers the face of women in all its institutions.

Among the 150 institutions that MES runs are 10 professional institutes, 18 arts and science colleges, 36 CBSE schools and many other institutions. It collectively serves 85,000 students and has more than15,000 employees

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 15:52

If anyone is interested to follow the hijab case between Karnataka HC full bench:

https://www.barandbench.com/news/hijab- ... ve-updates

Sachin · Post by **Sachin** » 10 Feb 2022 15:55

The Hijab case now being heard by Hon. Karnataka HC is now taking lots of twists and turns. The petitioner's advocate pleaded that this case was not related to Constitution, Fundamental rights etc and was asking for an verdict for the immediate issue (i.e the hijabis being kept outside the class). He cited the Karnataka Education Act and Rules to prove that uniform was not mandatory especially in PU colleges etc. But now looks like the Division Bench has said that they will have to consider the Constitution, Fundamental rights etc as it was passed up by the Single Bench because of the same reason only.

At least; I got a feeling that the peacefools now realise that things are going out of hand and are now looking for some escape route. Updates from Bar & Bench

Some arguments from petitioners..
Bar & Bench
3:43 pm, 10 Feb 2022
There is 1 operating principle in India - Sometimes we have to kindly adjust. {who and adjust to what?}

3:34 pm, 10 Feb 2022
I am requesting the State, that irrespective of dress, food, faith, they are all our girl children. This isn't just about essential religious practice. It is a case of essential education rights: Hegde. {So now the argument of mandatory requirement is gone with the wind}

SinghS · Post by **SinghS** » 10 Feb 2022 16:06

Sachin wrote:
At least; I got a feeling that the peacefools now realise that things are going out of hand and are now looking for some escape route. Updates from Bar & Bench

Please don't underestimate the collective wisdom of the collegium. They can come up with an interpretation of the constitution which talks of equality but treats majority unfavorably and doesn't grant them similar rights to those of minority.

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 16:13

https://youtu.be/xp67kWDurL4

Here is live telecast. The guy defending hijab is a Hindu with Krishna at his background.
The way it is handled itself is destined to loose.
Why the argument is not that hijab will segregate students into Muslims and kafir. This will lead to differentiation of minds if young kids hence result in morality problem?

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 16:13

This is what I posted 2 pages ago:

Their bravado and subjacent threat of violence aside, the last thing the male dominated muslim society wants is an open, mediatised public debate on hijab. They know its hard to defend on any grounds, they know such a public debate will encourage muslim women to come out, speak about it and rebel.

I suspect if there is a huge media debate that pierces the veil of this "its religious so you cant question it" stand, the plea will be quietly withdrawn. The fundamentalist muslim society is shit scared of its practices to be publicly brought out, discussed and debated.

Looks like the plaintiffs are scared to let this become a debate on hijab itself... they have started diluting and pleading on the grounds of "girl's study will be disturbed". If that is the concern, it shouldn't be hard to choose between "wearing hijab in class" and "continuing studies without hijab in class as before", right?

Keep watching, all kinds of taquiyaa arguments will be coming...

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 16:14

From bar and bench:

I do not want to add fuel to fire. This is a State which cannot afford any kind of disturbance. This is a State which contributes maximum to the Indian economy: Hegde.

There is your subjacent threat of violence ! Didn't take long coming...

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 16:16

Sachin wrote:.
At least; I got a feeling that the peacefools now realise that things are going out of hand and are now looking for some escape route. Updates from Bar & Bench
lor]

This is a ploy. U get for now hijab is ok and actual judgement will never come...

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 16:29

Exactly... thats why they are repeatedly offering to workout an interim solution with the AG !
But the bench is having none of it.

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 16:39

Cyrano wrote:Exactly... that's why they are repeatedly offering to workout an interim solution with the AG !
But the bench is having none of it.

the way case is going... i feel it is destined to loose anti-hijab side. my question is this problem is a generic problem why has it been made a specific Islamic women problem. why other religions requirnament are not included?
most important is what are we aiming for? we want a divided India? at the age of kids itself segregate them as kafir and Muslims? do we need such society? why we need to poison the minds of kids?
when we cant get uniform in a school mandated. people are dreaming about UCC

chetak · Post by **chetak** » 10 Feb 2022 16:52

Bound to cause a lot of heartburn among the soldout, presstitutes, and darbari media

Central Media Accreditation Guidelines 2022 put out by PIB: Accreditation may be suspended/withdrawn if journalist is charged with serious cognisable offence; acts in manner prejudicial to sovereignty & integrity of India, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, etc

— Bharti Jain (@bhartijainTOI) February 7, 2022

mount road mao tse tung has already fired the first salvo.

Understanding the new Central Media Accreditation Guidelines

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 17:22

The bench denied interim relief, asked all parties to maintain calm, to stick to the uniform rules, avoid wearing bhagwa scarfs or head scarfs and asked the govt to resume classes, until the bench continues the hearings on Monday.

Sachin · Post by **Sachin** » 10 Feb 2022 18:02

From Deccan Herald which is a pro-Congress secular news paper.
'Purdah is not essential but covering of head by scarf is obligatory,' Adv Kamat refers to Holy Quran. Even accepting this; the purpose can be easily achieved by a shawl draped over one's head. In fact this was very common for Muslim girls in KL before the Arab-isation began. And they too often did it only when elders were present.

The case is now adjourned to Feb 14th and till then it is [Hijab row] No religious garments till we decide the case, will pass interim order: Karnataka High Court.

Don't know if this would also allow for lot of of background manouvering.

SinghS wrote:Please don't underestimate the collective wisdom of the collegium.

Absolutely true!

madhu wrote:i feel it is destined to loose anti-hijab side. my question is this problem is a generic problem why has it been made a specific Islamic women problem. why other religions requirnament are not included?

If the anti-hijab side looses; then it is also going to have a national impact. High Court verdicts have pan-India significance, and one verdict from a state HC can be used as reference in other states. So if the hijabis win; it would only add more communal disharmony across the country. If our judicial establishments want that to happen then so be it. If Hijab is allowed, there would follow more demands and then more communal fissures.

The Muslims are comparing their religious mandates with those of Sikh religion. The common understanding is that for Sikh men; the five Ks are mandatory (and you miss one you are not a true Sikh). Where as for Muslims they don't have any mandatory dressing requirements at all. These requirements were introduced in last 15-20 years only, and I am sure people from KA and KL can prove that all these Arab fancy dresses were never there in the state. The crux of this case is to prove that hijab (which has a distinct style) is mandatory. Even Adv Kamat has only been able to argue that covering of head is obligatory as per Islamic laws. Covering of head can be achieved without a hijab, burqah, niquab etc.

chanakyaa · Post by **chanakyaa** » 10 Feb 2022 19:48

If the anti-hijab side looses; then it is also going to have a national impact. High Court verdicts have pan-India significance, and one verdict from a state HC can be used as reference in other states....

Kapil Sibal has already filed a Supreme Court case just in case KA verdict comes unsatisfactory. Insisting full bench hear the case. He is blackmailing court that exams are approaching and an immediate is action needed. Amazing how these scoundrels get courts attention when lakhs of cases are waiting.

How easy it is for BIF to trigger unrest in India using a piece of cloth...

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 19:52

Sachin wrote: If the anti-hijab side looses; then it is also going to have a national impact. High Court verdicts have pan-India significance, and one verdict from a state HC can be used as reference in other states. So if the hijabis win; it would only add more communal disharmony across the country. If our judicial establishments want that to happen then so be it. If Hijab is allowed, there would follow more demands and then more communal fissures.etc.

Exactly this is my point. If Muslim/gov/mullah we're so much worried about women wishes, choice and needs, then they will be fighting for halal, TTT. Unfortunately that is not the case.

Sachin wrote: The Muslims are comparing their religious mandates with those of Sikh religion.

This is not the case. The case is is Islam becoming week or strong against hindus. If it is weakening then they junk secularism... Need religion as a democratic right(hijab, TTT, UCC) if it is winning then junk democracy (Anti CAA)...

vijayk · Post by **vijayk** » 10 Feb 2022 19:59

K'taka AG looks like some weakling who is mumbling ... very pathetic show till now

chetak · Post by **chetak** » 10 Feb 2022 21:01

vijayk wrote:K'taka AG looks like some weakling who is mumbling ... very pathetic show till now

most AGs are political compulsions, appointed to pacify one or the other faction

merit is nowhere on the horizon and expecting anything from them is a waste of time

Ashokk · Post by **Ashokk** » 10 Feb 2022 21:25

Personal expenses, fixed deposit in father’s name, transfers to her sister out of public funds: Details as ED attaches assets worth Rs 1.77 crores of Rana Ayyub

The Enforcement Directorate has attached assets worth Rs 1.77 crores of alleged journalist Rana Ayyub under the Money Laundering Act. The ED has, in its attachment order said, “Rana Ayyub has cheated the general Public Donors in a pre-planned manner and with the intention to cheat the general public donors”.

The order says that Rana Ayyub’s scam started right from the time when she collected the money and started withdrawing it from the savings account of herself and her family members. The ED order further says that a “Fixed Deposit amounting to Rs. 50 Lakh was booked from her saving bank account through net banking and opening a separate Current bank account and subsequently funds were transferred from her saving bank account and bank account of her sister and father and did not utilize for the purpose for which it was raised by Ms. Rana Ayyub through launching campaigns through Ketto.org”.

Terming the funds raised and misused by Rana Ayyub as “proceeds of crime”, the ED order stated that Rana Ayyub knowingly indulged in “Proceeds of Crime including its acquisition, possession, use and projecting it as untainted property and therefore, she has committed the offence of money laundering as defined under section 3 of the Act, 2002 which is punishable under section 4 of the Act”. The actions by Ayyub are considered scheduled offences under the PMLA, ED said.

chetak · Post by **chetak** » 10 Feb 2022 21:38

^^^^^^^

standard jehadi practice

too bad that she got caught onlee

she is a $h@r!@ed woke, so it will pass off without much comment in the presstitute media

This foolish govt is very forgiving, especially of their sworn enemies, so even the charges will be "adjusted"

at least arrest openly and then let out on bail in full glare of the teevee cameras

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 21:43

Lawyers for the plaintiff were articulate but they had nothing much to go on and tried to compromise with AG, but neither he nor the beach was willing.

They were caught in a love triangle between essential practice and religious right and freedom of expression.

If they say hijaab is an essential practice (which means they have to demonstrate it is so, which is far from easy) therefore must be allowed, then namaz is also essential practice so should that be allowed in the classroom as well? If not an essential practice then there is no case. Additionally, carrying a kripaan is essential practice for Sikhs. But they have accepted to let go of it in modern times, so why can't muslims let go of hijaab? If everyone brings essential religious practices to school then how can classes run?

If religious right then a school is a secular place, practice your religion at home. At best you can cover your head with school uniform dupatta or scarf, which anyone can, so can't ask for exceptional treatment for something everyone can already do. So no case.

If freedom of expression, then it has to be tempered as per law and subordinate to rules of the school. Can't have black hijaab or burqa which are not part of uniform.

Can't argue "but why bindi is allowed", that's not object of your case, moreover bindi is not clothing, so not uniform, you can also wear if you wish.

"Then what about sikh turban?" Well they gave up the well established essential practice of kripaan. What essential practice are you willing to give up among namaaz, kalma, hajj, zakaat and roza? Hey but wait a second, hijaab is not in the list? So why is it an essential practice?

Get a bowl of popcorn if you plan to watch the proceedings live on Monday.

dsreedhar · Post by **dsreedhar** » 10 Feb 2022 21:47

madhu wrote:
Sahih International Quran 33.59: O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.
a) does this mean Muslim women be identified and left but kafir can be abused?
b) does this aayath give permission to Muslim men to abuse kafir as they are not in hijab, so will court allow it to?
c) is it not for identification which is against the sprit of uniform? we need uniform to stop discrimination between rich/poor, religion, cast etc.

The above are very good points. Yesterday Madhukishwar had a good discussion on this topic. Vashi sharma talked about the context in which the burqa came up and reasons. The history of hijab should be discussed in every channel. This may scare the hijabis and put them in backfoot.

Rudradev · Post by **Rudradev** » 10 Feb 2022 21:59

Rana Ayyub's father Muhammad Ayyub Waqif has had a long career as a rabid jihadi propagandist, trained in the Muslim Brotherhood/Qutbist program of infiltrating the left and hijacking "progressive social-justice" causes with a narrative of Muslim victimhood. He was at one time the editor of "Blitz", a far-left snotrag of a publication whose descendants are "Caravan" and "Scroll" today.

Rana Ayyub's brother Arif Ayyub is no less of a rabid Qutbist jihadi, but infiltrated a totally different type of media organization. He became the publisher of the Indian edition of ELLE, a fashion magazine in the style of Harper's and Cosmoplitan that appeals to the vapid consumerist elites of Indian metro cities. He rarely showed his true colors, but when he did, it was spectacular. In his tweets he rants against Saudi and UAE for having joined the Abraham Accords to make peace with Israel, and demands that other Muslim nations go to war against them-- a clear articulation of the Muslim Brotherhood position supported by Qatar and Turkey. https://www.opindia.com/2022/01/rana-br ... ck-israel/

See how efficiently their propaganda infiltrates into all types of media outlets.
Muhammad Ayyub Waqif: = Old-school CPIML Big-Bindi brigade
Arif Ayyub:= Bollywood-aspirants, Dil Chahta Hai types, yuppie brigade in Indian metros
Rana Ayyub: = WaPo, NYT, international media

So no surprise that her financial irregularities are a family operation.

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 22:02

Exactly! That's why establishing hijaab as essential practice is far from easy, it will open the Pandora's box of Islam itself.

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 10 Feb 2022 22:15

Rana Ayyub is the same motormaa who swindled Tahelka taking money for a year to produce Gujarat files which were so totally useless that even tehelka couldn't print them. LahoreVillaKooWatt !

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 10 Feb 2022 22:20

dsreedhar wrote:Vashi sharma talked about the context in which the burqa came up and reasons. The history of hijab should be discussed in every channel. This may scare the hijabis and put them in backfoot.

Let me quote the context

Narrated `Aisha: The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqi` at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. `Umar used to say to the Prophet "Let your wives be veiled," but Allah's Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam`a the wife of the Prophet went out at `Isha' time and she was a tall lady. `Umar addressed her and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda." He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of "Al-Hijab" (A complete body cover excluding the eyes). Sahih al-Bukhari 146

This brings some interesting points
1) so umar has power to compel Allah to get aayat.
2) what did Umar saw when Sauda was going to toilet that Allah gave this aayat
3) a decent guy (Mohammad ) would scold his friend for indecent act. Instead going to Allah

Now to prove that burkha is not essential here is an hadith

Narrated Um `Atiya: We were ordered to bring out our menstruating women and veiled women in the religious gatherings and invocation of Muslims on the two `Id festivals. These menstruating women were to keep away from their Musalla. A woman asked, "O Allah's Messenger ' What about one who does not have a veil?" He said, "Let her share the veil of her companion."Sahih al-Bukhari 351

vijayk · Post by **vijayk** » 10 Feb 2022 23:53

https://www.rediff.com/news/report/yout ... 220210.htm
Youth Congress chief files plea in SC over Karnataka 'hijab' row

The plea, filed by Youth Congress president B V Srinivas and a journalism student, contended that there is a direct infringement of fundamental rights and also as events are happening in multiple states and likely to spread further, it would be better and proper that the apex court takes cognizance of the issue.

The plea said that different high courts in different states may pass conflicting orders.

"Everyone has the right to wear clothes/ head gear of their choice and practise their own religion, its customs and traditions. If a small girl child is seen wearing ’hijab’, it can be 'not out of her own choice' but for older and adult girls and women wherein it is their choice, the right must be protected. Belief in religion is one thing but religious fanaticism is another facet altogether.

vijayk · Post by **vijayk** » 11 Feb 2022 00:18

Realzed what PAPPU is doing ... He thinks he doesn't care about what happens to Congress. Let them go to SP or TMC or RJD whoever can defeat Modi. His belief is if these parties fail to dislodge BJP, all minorities will come back to him. There will be enough stupid hindus who will hate BJP for reasons of secularism, caste, region

vimal · Post by **vimal** » 11 Feb 2022 00:27

PAKISTAN
The amount of mental gymnastics by Hindus on this forum and elsewhere on hijab issue is mind numbing. Pakistan was created to solve these problems and is the the only solution for all the peacefools living in India. Why do we have to keep reacting like stupid to every provocation?
BTW I think this issue will help BJP in the UP/UK elections. WhatsApp is flooded with all such messages and calls for unity etc on both side. Congoons are being clever by half here.

srikandan · Post by **srikandan** » 11 Feb 2022 00:37

So what if the Burqa or Hijab is mandated by the Quran? All this hair splitting using the Quran as a reference is ridiculous, when India is supposed to be a constitutional republic -- the only thing the courts should be interpreting is the constitution, not arbitrary religious texts. Seriously, for such a serious issue, the KA govt. cannot get a decent AG to argue the case.

https://www.opindia.com/2021/11/preside ... ution-day/

President had it right when he questioned the capability and intelligence of the people in the Indian Judiciary. The collegium is the last hope for Rahul Gandy and his minions to subvert the elected govt.

Without diluting it to the slightest degree, can a better way be found to select judges for the higher judiciary? For instance, there can be an all-India Judicial Service which can select, nurture and promote the right talent, right from the lower levels to the higher levels.

Cyrano · Post by **Cyrano** » 11 Feb 2022 01:55

Because we also have

Indian Constitution Art. 25: Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.—(1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion.

What is their religion ? How should it be professed, practiced and propagated? They will show you (some version of) the Koran. They will show you the Bible. What will hindus show? We have a million sacred texts ! And even more undocumented traditions

In a weird sort of way, its actually a good thing our judiciary swings in and out of the ambit of the constitution, because much as we respect our constitution, its has deep flaws that were carried over from the colonial era.

Judiciary doesn't operate in a vacuum though sometimes they compel us to think otherwise. Change of public opinion and public expectations will influence the judiciary and we just have to keep building that societal pressure by all lawful means so that dharmic agenda can be achieved.

Vayutuvan · Post by **Vayutuvan** » 11 Feb 2022 02:53

Sachin wrote:At least; I got a feeling that the peacefools now realise that things are going out of hand and are now looking for some escape route.

A request. Could we please refrain from using these kinds of epithets especially at a time when the tempers are running high?

Thanks

Vayutuvan · Post by **Vayutuvan** » 11 Feb 2022 02:57

madhu wrote:when we cant get uniform in a school mandated. people are dreaming about UCC

Two different issues. Uniforms lead to job losses in the textile sector. Teenagers love to wear latest fashionable designs and material.

UCC is far far bigger.

Vayutuvan · Post by **Vayutuvan** » 11 Feb 2022 03:06

Cyrano wrote: ... They were caught in a love triangle between essential practice and religious right and freedom of expression. ...

Excellent post, Cyrano gaaru.

KL Dubey · Post by **KL Dubey** » 11 Feb 2022 04:36

Seems like Uddhav's vidushak Sanjay Raut is starting to have his goose cooked:

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/p ... 2022-02-10

https://indianexpress.com/article/expla ... d-7764436/

Not sure why this clown is writing to the VP/RS chairman....maybe he forgot Hamid Ansari is not in the chair anymore...

madhu · Post by **madhu** » 11 Feb 2022 08:13

I have failed to understand the wisdom of milord

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/secu ... ons-191617

'

We Are A Secular Country; There Is An Effort To Divide The Country By Religion' : Madras HC CJ
While hearing a public interest litigation before Madras High Court to mandate the customary dress code for entry inside temple complexes, Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari expressed anguish at the divisive narratives in the name of religion.

Reminding that our country is a secular country, the Chief Justice cautioned that there is an effort to divide the country by religion.
" What is of paramount importance? Country or religion? It is really shocking to see that somebody is for Hijab, some others are for dhotis inside temples. Is this one country or is it divided by religion?", the Chief Justice asked.

So as per the great knowledge of justice, temple is a secular place so don't divide the country by religion please allow hijab. But Schools where kids do not know what is God and religion can ware burkha and get differentiated as momins and kafirs...