Hi Chidu! Wave.

I agree, but lets not trivialize the personal tragedy here. I would wager to bet that there is personal tension going on here between DK and her husband. My piskological read is that Indian MEA and DK's dad steadfastly wanted her back in India and didn't want to compromise on her's and India's H&D, while he (DK's husband) wanted her to plea bargain. Lets see what happens in future.sivab wrote:
ASR seems to be literally "house husband" like "house wife". No offense meant.
Now it turns out that the the Bureau of Diplomatic Security coordinator of the anti-terrorism program at the US embassy in Delhi, Wayne May (and his diplomat wife Alice Muller May) don’t much like India or Indians.
May is the guy who subverted the Indian judiciary, refused to let the police in Delhi act on Khobragade’s charge of extortion, got a T visa for the nanny, and “evacuated” her out of the country a couple of days before the diplomat was arrested, likely at his instigation.
The May’s Facebook page was taken down as soon as bloggers pounced on it, but someone saved it and uploaded it elsewhere.
..
One wonders what kind of outreach Ms. May can do when she doesn’t seem to like being in the country and doesn’t have the self-restraint not to vent her feelings about it on the internet. It’s also very telling that Ms May has no Indians in her circle on the net.
What’s more fascinating than any specific comment is the overall tone. Nothing of substance or insight. Endless chatter with an all-American cast (no Indian friends) about wine, food, trips, and various dinners. Plenty of posts about negative news reports. Frequent references to America as “the real world.”
Mind you, these folks, as diplomats, live in the better part of Delhi, are exposed to little in the way of the real travails of Indian life. But even their own air-conditioned, sheltered enclave, with its duty-free imports, liquor and special privileges, is too demanding.
..
Wayne May: https://app.box.com/s/e8ghs9b4kpbqicvsro4w
Alicia May: https://app.box.com/s/4sh98h97flxukl2n7dit
Here are some excerpts from Alicia Muller May’s Facebook page: (http://duckduckduckdoge.tumblr.com/)
The problem (which has been ruled OT for this thread, but with some deft wording I am hoping to get around) is that leave Dr. DK aside - had they picked on somebody else in place of Dr. DK, what were the chances that even that person was also "tainted"?Lilo wrote:to build the perception that she is "tainted" and deserves the treatment meted to her by the ohh soo pure at heart Unkil Massa bleeding at the "injustice" meted to the "defenceless" maid Sangeeta Richards.
Posts were made in this thread too for that matter.
...
Now just the dog post by none other than the one who precipitated this incident in Massa embassy of Dilli ( TFTA Alicia May and TFTA Wayne May) will suffice to break this perception among India's aspirational young and probably few of the Forrin "liberals" types too.
I don't think they did. As I mentioned in my previous post - this episode has exposed the haphazardness and incompetence of the government and its various arms including the foreign ministry, diplomatic corps, immigration, and police.Lilo wrote:Dubey ji,
Do you think GoI or IB didn't do that check before allowing DK to be posted in Massaland ?
So whose check results are we waiting now to establish his guilty unless proven innocent credentials ?
On Sunday, the Indian television news channel NDTV 24x7 reported that the Foreign Ministry now wants the government to designate the Indian maids accompanying diplomats abroad as government workers, so that they are not subject to the laws of a foreign country.
MUMBAI: Ahead of Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade's arrival in Mumbai on Monday evening, her father revealed letters of the witnesses submitted to the court in New York which clearly indicated 'good relations' between her and her maid Sangeeta Richards.
"These affidavits demonstrate the lack of any basis of the charges against you. These are redacted to protect the identity of the witnesses. Obviously the US government knows the identity of the contract witnesses. They neglected to ever contact them," said Devyani's lawyer Daniel Arshack who appeared on her be half before the New York court said in his mail sent in reply to Devyani's father.
KLP Dubey wrote:I don't think they did. As I mentioned in my previous post - this episode has exposed the haphazardness and incompetence of the government and its various arms including the foreign ministry, diplomatic corps, immigration, and police.Lilo wrote:Dubey ji,
Do you think GoI or IB didn't do that check before allowing DK to be posted in Massaland ?
So whose check results are we waiting now to establish his guilty unless proven innocent credentials ?
When there is a rule that foreign citizen spouses of India diplomats must take Indian citizenship, why was that rule flouted for 8 years in this case? Among many questions, one that arises is why was Rathore being "protected"/"exempted" from that requirement, and by whom? Your question seems totally disingenuous.
Also see here:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-new ... 45867.aspx
The "no foreign spouses" rule is being enforced in the Army. So why were DK and Rathore exempted for 8 years after the wonderful checks done by Gov and IB ?
Chidu should be sued by Anmol for copyright violation and altering his journalistic work without his permission. Chidu could have given the article an honest tone.Nandu wrote:I am sure (from what I've read in many of his dispatches) that Chidu is a regular lurker here at BRF.
Hi Chidu! Wave.
Guys this is OT but the point Dr. DK makes is vary valid. If India is in violation of the WTO obligations US and others should file a case with WTO. They do not do that because they know that Indian is in complete compliance of its obligation to WTO. Exceptions like compulsory licencing is valid under WTO.Just weeks before being abruptly arrested and strip-searched in New York leading to outrage in her home country, a now-departed Indian diplomat took on the powerful US business lobby over India’s controversial approach to intellectual property.
..
On 14 November, the GIPC held an event on the doorstep of the investment community in Manhattan that called into question India’s practices on IPR, suggesting that it is hurting foreign investment (IPW, Developing Country Policy, 18 November 2013).
At that event, attended by Intellectual Property Watch, Khobragade was outspoken in defence of India and engaged in debate with US industry proponents. She emphatically denied that India has violated its obligations under World Trade Organization IP rules (no country has yet brought a dispute there), said investment and research are strong in the country, distinguished that India’s courts are independent from government, and said that just because of one compulsory licence and a couple of court decisions, one cannot say the investment environment is off.
Khobragade demanded that in future, an Indian representative be given a place at the table to present their side of the story. Industry representatives and consultants, meanwhile, argued that repeated efforts to engage with the Indian government have met with little success.
A few weeks later, a US investigation turned up alleged violations in her treatment of the worker.
India retaliated against the US action on Khobragade (including removing now-restored security barriers around the US embassy in New Delhi), and on Friday the US agreed to expel a US diplomat of equal rank from New Delhi, according to reports.
The US-India Business Council, which includes the US Chamber and Indian industry groups, tracked the Khobragade story on a daily basis in its news to subscribers.
Philip ji, are you suggesting the resurrection of NAM - a failed movement which gave rise to dictators like Sukarno and Castro, Sadat followed by Nasser?Philip wrote:Our own NAM/whatever equivalent of the ICJ (International War Crimes Court)should be set up in India ,representing the rights of the aggrieved nations,and these despicable neo-Nazis should be tried if available or in absentia,so that there freedom of movement across the globe is at least curtailed,knowing that they would be arrested and deported if they travelled to those countries aprt of the group.
That's true in US too. Just last week as Fox was going hammer and tongs at VP Biden, CNN had continuous coverage of Gov. Christie and the bridge closure. Only silver lining is that they are controlled by people from within the US.putnanja wrote:Unfortunately in India, the media is so biased towards particular political parties that establishing an "independent media" is very difficult. The media guys are biased towards political parties on domestic issues.
Matrimc ji ,matrimc wrote:Philip ji, are you suggesting the resurrection of NAM - a failed movement which gave rise to dictators like Sukarno and Castro, Sadat followed by Nasser?Philip wrote:Our own NAM/whatever equivalent of the ICJ (International War Crimes Court)should be set up in India ,representing the rights of the aggrieved nations,and these despicable neo-Nazis should be tried if available or in absentia,so that there freedom of movement across the globe is at least curtailed,knowing that they would be arrested and deported if they travelled to those countries aprt of the group.
One answer might be "The Ugly American", by Eugene Burdick and William Lederer, first published in 1958.matrimc wrote:....Otherwise why the US fscked up a good relationship and goodwill with 1.2 billion is incomprehensible.
The top reader review from 2003 on Amazon.com says:Authentic, infuriating, and explosively candid, this is the daring, classic bestseller that unmasked the blundering hypocrisy of some of our top-level diplomats. It exposes the opportunism, incompetence, and cynical deceit that have become imbedded in the fabric of our public relations, not only in Asia but all over the world.
A recent review, from August 2013 says:The Ugly American succeeds on three major counts:
1) The book is a devastating look at the way the American diplomatic corps presents itself abroad. It may have been written decades ago, but given recent events and little evidence that anything has changed in the State Department, the lessons are still extremely applicable to this day. Every foreign service officer should read this as a manual on how to conduct themselves and adapt to foreign cultures.
2) The authors are clearly cutting into American policy without going overboard and cutting into the United States. This is no anti-American rant; Lederer and Burdick seem to write this book with one eye firmly on furthering America's ability to advance its interests and cooperate more effectively with other nations.
3) Each one of the short stories is extremely entertaining. I started this book at 10 pm one night and finished it three hours later after being totally unable to put it down. On top of its commentary, it's a quick and fascinating read.
I will just note that the character of the American diplomatic corps does not magically improve when the people are at home, any more than you can remove the Pakistaniyat by moving someone from Lahore to Liverpool.This book was written over 50 years ago. So why did I just hear about it recently, and only by chance? It should be required reading in every US university, and definitely for every member (and wannabe member) of our State Department! The authors deftly prove their top-notch writing skills by getting readers to reach the desired conclusion, without ever saying a single word that directly leads them there: namely, that our whole foreign-service system is an institutional disaster, and needs radical overhaul from top to bottom.
Lilo,Lilo wrote:Then you speak about a rule the specifics of which you again seem to lack a grasp of ... like how many years a person needs to be associated/reside in India to become a naturalised citizen ?
My question , What of all the visits to nagpur area sampling and advising on popularising the nascent (yet world class) Indian wines abroad and the formal position Mr Rathore held as adviser to Govt of Maharashtra - wonder how much of residentship time it amounts to hain ji?
Excuse me - I quoted it because the same rules apply to IFS and Armed Forces personnel. The latter seem to be enforcing the rules properly.BTW when did Foreign Service began to get equated with "Territorial Army".
FWIW, I think you are right on Wayne May. He will suffer along with Uzra Zeya and one Mustafa Herro (I kid you not and it's a she). The 'brass' at DoS are seriously PO'd at what has happened. They share the moment with Chris Christie and Bridgegate and they don't like it and they are looking for heads to roll.TSJones wrote:
When things go wrong you've got to be able to produce a body for sacrifice. The Foreign Service is no different than any government organization. The Mays will be "it". Unless you are absolutely convinced the Foreign Service in total is a racist, bigotted organization that looks down on poor people. I personally do not thik that is the case. A stumbling bureaucracy, that sometimes doesn't have the common sense that God gave a goose? Yes, I believe that. But a total arm of evil biggoted people? No I don't think that.
WTF am I reading????Cosmo_R wrote: .....snip.......
Time wounds all heels.
......snip......
From people in the USFS that I interacted with from 1955-1980. Enough to form an opinion. The Dane, Dutch incidents are public domain. The Italians I know personally.sanjaykumar wrote:Overall, the USFS is pretty idealistic (if naive) and far from bigoted. If you want to know who the really bigoted diplos in India are, I'd say start with the Dutch, followed by the Russians. The Scandinavians (in particular the Danes) are at the forefront as well. The Italians are no prize either. Way below are the Brits and the US.
However did you get this information? And does it matter if Danes are bigoted? Most educated Indians might think a Dane is dog.
CRS, I sincerely believe that, for various reasons, the days are long gone of the US significantly damaging India at the strategic level. The US would also be damaging itself in the bargain. While none of us would wish the Indo-US relationship to reach the nadir of the 70s, such a wish cannot be merely because of the fear of being hurt 'significantly' if it so happened.CRamS wrote:I think more than anything else, a downturn in relations means US can do significant damage to India at the strategic level. I mean US India TSP has always been a zero sum game. TSP punches above its weight because of US support. Increased US pampering of TSP will surely hurt India.
Now that would be a true "Boss DK" posting!pankajs wrote:My idea is to post her as a officer in charge of immunity/privileges of foreign diplomats (perhaps known as the protocol officer???). Force US embassy to petition her for relief in these time of excessive pandugiri as far as US diplomats are concernedramana wrote:I think now that DK has very good first hand experience with US system she should be out in the America desk so the US diplomats get to meet her in Delhi every time they visit and think over what they did.
Better still she needs to be posted in Kabul or Sudan (does Sudan have an US Embassy there now ?)!!pankajs wrote:My idea is to post her as a officer in charge of immunity/privileges of foreign diplomats (perhaps known as the protocol officer???). Force US embassy to petition her for relief in these time of excessive pandugiri as far as US diplomats are concernedramana wrote:I think now that DK has very good first hand experience with US system she should be out in the America desk so the US diplomats get to meet her in Delhi every time they visit and think over what they did.
Better late than never.New Delhi: In a major fallout after the Devyani Khobragade case, the Foreign Ministry reportedly pressured the Finance Ministry to bring changes in the status of domestic workers who go to the United States of America with other Indian envoys, sources said.
It is curtains over the Devyani case but not for many other domestic helps who are still staying or go to the US with Indian envoys.
According to an english news channel, Foreign Secretary Sujata Singh met senior Finance Ministry officials on Sunday over this matter, sources said.
Around 14 more maids are still there in US who had went there on A3 visa like Sangeeta Richard, the domestic help of Devyani. The visa subjects them to US laws. All of them have gone under the same informal arrangement with the US state department.
I disagree with the last line. "Indo-US strategic interests" is a fraud just like its elder brother "strategic partnership". We should only worry about Indian strategic interests. The US is quite capable of taking care of its own.New Delhi’s decision to expel Wayne May, chief of the US embassy’s diplomatic security contingent in Delhi, shows that India is finally shedding its attitude of servitude towards America. That the US has allowed Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade to return to India after she was indicted by a jury for “visa fraud” and for underpaying her domestic help is not enough. New Delhi needs to do more to set Indo-US relations on a foundation of respect and reciprocity. We should continue denial of special privileges to US diplomats serving in India till Washington reciprocates. The measures taken against US embassy staff and others—withdrawal of liquor permits, removal of road barriers outside the Delhi embassy and withdrawal of other special privileges—should remain. They were unilateral benefits we gave. The US does not give us any such concessions on its territory. The special entry and freedom from frisking that we offer US officials should be withdrawn and remain so, unless there is complete reciprocity.
The Americans would have least expected that India, under the weak and ineffective Manmohan Singh government, would flex its muscles. US arrogance and highhandedness have always been manifest in varying degrees. Dr APJ Abdul Kalam was frisked at New York airport when he visited the US in 2011. When India protested, the US only regretted that appropriate procedures for “expedited screening” of VIPs were not followed.
Yet, it cannot be denied that while the Americans betrayed great arrogance in treatment of Khobragade who was kept in a cell for a few hours in company of criminals, India also went too far in insisting on an American apology after secretary of state John Kerry had expressed regret. The removal of barricades from outside the US embassy was not in good taste. India has rightly made its point. Now, while sticking to reciprocity, it is time to heal the relationship in Indo-US strategic interests.