Re: Sunni Terrorist Fragments of Unstable Pakistan-Sept 05,
Posted: 28 Sep 2015 23:58
Anyone keeping count of lashes delivered to lal topi?
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
Meanwhile: A tweet: Look who is saying "Kem cho PM.. Just dropped by! Missed You in Silicon Valley"Jhujar wrote:Why is Nawaz Tied to wall by Chain/ leash on right side.Amber G. wrote:^^^ Nawaj vs Modi -- ok Some = =
Here Satya Nadela's "Baap" (as PR office of PM said) actually "PRAISING" Sharif for having only 32 cases of polio! (Bharat as everyone knows gotten no praise -- it does not even have a single case of polio)
<image>
This is not the first time this has happened. Pakis have been observing and copying Modi ever since he became PM. After Modi announced Mudra Bank, Pakis are considering setting up a micro finance institution -Amber G. wrote:Meanwhile.. Paki supreme court is listening to Modi, and to do a = = passed a law that directs Prime Minister and the President to deliver speeches in Urdu language whether inside or outside the country.
Pakistan considers setting up Microfinance Company
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mum ... 701533.eceJE Menon wrote:^^Fully agree. High profile, and possibly leadership targeting. Very dangerous situation. I hope the military in Pakistan has been fully and appropriately warned about the repercussions. It will not be something they can back out of.
Mumbai airport on high alert after threat call
A MUSLIM father has admitted to strangling his 19-year-old daughter to death after she was caught shoplifting condoms to use with a man she had been forbidden from dating.
Asadullah Khan, 51, used his bare hands to strangle his daughter Lareeb because she had brought “dishonour” to the family, the court in Germany heard.
His wife Shazia Khan, 41, is also on trial for their daughter’s murder as she did not attempt to stop him.
The couple, originally from Pakistan, then dressed their daughter in her dental assistant work attire and used a wheelchair to transport her to their car. They used the car to relocate her body from their high-rise apartment in the city of Darmstadt to a forest, where they disposed of it by rolling her down the hill.
Mr Khan said the family’s honour had been jeopardised after Lareeb had started dating a man despite attempts by her family to stop it. …………………….
The GOI has denied that Modi waved to sharif. It was on the ticker on some TV channelAmber G. wrote:Added to my previous post:
BTW: Bill gates & PakiPM Meeting was not about BG "praising" Pak -as most of the Paki rags reported.. it was Sharif updating Bill Gates of "the usage of funds he granted to Islamabad to eradicate polio.”
![]()
BWT They say the Paki - H&D is saved ... By none other than NaMo..
See here: Paki PM waving and getting waved at (and a smile too!!!) by worlds largest Democracy leader.
![]()
Some youtube links?Vipul wrote:Immense heart burn in Pakistan for the star treatment to Modi and the absolute non-event that Nawaz Sharif has become in in America.
ISI/Army mouthpieces in the "anal"yst brigade have been active on the "talk shows" saying Pakistan "bilkul akela nahin hai", "pakistan ek bada mulk hai" and the clincher "Hame zara bhi ehsaas-e-kum tareen hone ki zarurat nahin hai"![]()
Pakis simply cannot figure out how to handle Modi. Their frustration is clearly evident in the various talk shows at the increasing importance that India is getting globally.
Key insight! Add to it an anglophone "liberal" window-dressing.RajeshA wrote:Pakistaniyat is in a way legitimization of a feudal structure through the use of Islam as the basis of its nationhood. The feudal structures in Pakistan were never changed into anything more egalitarian.
Saudis were counting but one day camel ate the notebook....................so they have to start all over again to count properly. Salamabhijitm wrote:Anyone keeping count of lashes delivered to lal topi?
Girl buying condom for boy friend. It is quite unusual for a girl from conservative family.What the hell boy friend was doing. I see that girl bought ( caught stealing)condom for "just in case" type random encounters. Such goris keep a condom or two in purse.arun wrote:Joh Dera Ismail Khan mein g**du, woh Darmstadt mein bhi g**du.
“Originally from Pakistan” Asadullah Khan in Court for honour killing his daughter.
Muslim parents face court in Germany after murdering daughter for shoplifting condoms to have sex with forbidden boyfriend :
A MUSLIM father has admitted to strangling his 19-year-old daughter to death after she was caught shoplifting condoms to use with a man she had been forbidden from dating.
Asadullah Khan, 51, used his bare hands to strangle his daughter Lareeb because she had brought “dishonour” to the family, the court in Germany heard.
His wife Shazia Khan, 41, is also on trial for their daughter’s murder as she did not attempt to stop him.
The couple, originally from Pakistan, then dressed their daughter in her dental assistant work attire and used a wheelchair to transport her to their car. They used the car to relocate her body from their high-rise apartment in the city of Darmstadt to a forest, where they disposed of it by rolling her down the hill.
Mr Khan said the family’s honour had been jeopardised after Lareeb had started dating a man despite attempts by her family to stop it. …………………….
Someone said his "laash" was found in Makkahabhijitm wrote:Anyone keeping count of lashes delivered to lal topi?
A post that needs to be carved in stone.RajeshA wrote:Pakistaniyat is in a way legitimization of a feudal structure through the use of Islam as the basis of its nationhood. The feudal structures in Pakistan were never changed into anything more egalitarian.
The fundamental fact about feudalism is that there is zero interest among the feudal elite to do any human resource development or to unduly worry about the basic services being provided to the population. Why should they do it? That way, they would only endanger their continued rule over the masses.
India seems to have gotten over this problem to a large extent. In Pakistan it is not solvable.
Hassan Nisar told of one incident that one time 40 Poakserfs jumped into water to fetch one bird hunted by feudal lord. One dignitary accompanying the feudal was startled to watch such slavish behaviour. It dawned on him that why feudals oppose secular education as they will loose their lordship over pile of Foolshii..shiv wrote:RajeshA wrote:Pakistaniyat is in a way legitimization of a feudal structure through the use of Islam as the basis of its nationhood. The feudal structures in Pakistan were never changed into anything more egalitarian.The fundamental fact about feudalism is that there is zero interest among the feudal elite to do any human resource development or to unduly worry about the basic services being provided to the population. Why should they do it? That way, they would only endanger their continued rule over the masses.India seems to have gotten over this problem to a large extent. In Pakistan it is not solvable.
What micro-finance Company! They already have D Company running hawala networks.partha wrote:This is not the first time this has happened. Pakis have been observing and copying Modi ever since he became PM. After Modi announced Mudra Bank, Pakis are considering setting up a micro finance institution -Amber G. wrote:Meanwhile.. Paki supreme court is listening to Modi, and to do a = = passed a law that directs Prime Minister and the President to deliver speeches in Urdu language whether inside or outside the country.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/962915/cred ... e-company/Pakistan considers setting up Microfinance Company
shiv wrote:A post that needs to be carved in stone.RajeshA wrote:Pakistaniyat is in a way legitimization of a feudal structure through the use of Islam as the basis of its nationhood. The feudal structures in Pakistan were never changed into anything more egalitarian.
The fundamental fact about feudalism is that there is zero interest among the feudal elite to do any human resource development or to unduly worry about the basic services being provided to the population. Why should they do it? That way, they would only endanger their continued rule over the masses.
India seems to have gotten over this problem to a large extent. In Pakistan it is not solvable.
It is solvable only by revolution. That is possible only if the Paki army becomes weak.
Its Poak SatireWhen the Delhi police were contacted for comment, police spokesperson, Inspector Sarju Golmaal said the police are acting within the law in the best interest of the Muslims. Barring any action by police, local Hindu clerics will be tempted to enter the Muslim houses and stop the sacrifice on their own.“Is this what you want?” he asked, angrily pointing at the reporter.Amidst the craziness, India’s civil society and liberal circles on social media openly condemned this move.“Pakistan has launched a satellite to Mars and look at our issues here at home. How embarrassing!” said Indian journalist Janam Kapoor.The Indian government, as usual, remains shamelessly silent on this embarrassing violation of the freedom of religion of India’s Muslim population.When will Indians garner the courage to stand up to this religious extremism and continued bullying by extremist Hindu clerics?When will the state stop appeasing to their demands and consider the Muslims their own?While we press Indian authorities and the public for answers, let us show our support for Indian Muslims through social media and tweet out #IStandWithIndianMuslims. Let us reach out to them and extend our #EidMubarak to them.This simple gesture of solidarity might be the least we can do.
The real face of Pakistan occupied Kashmir has been exposed. There are massive protests against the Pakistani government in several areas of PoK, including Muzaffarabad, Gilgit and Kotli. CNN-IBN exposes how the Pakistani establishment is using brutal force to quell rebellion in the region, resorting to massive human rights violation even though Islamabad has never lost an opportunity to hit out at New Delhi over Kashmir and the alleged attempts to suppress the people living in the Valley.
A lot of brotherhood until reaching Europe where the pious brothers immediately show the true colors. The separate migrant accommodation idea is merely a symptom.It took police several hours to quell the violence between some 400 migrants at Calden, near Kassel in central Germany, German media report.
..
But one migrant group was moved out to separate accommodation.
..
Tensions have arisen there and elsewhere over the way asylum claims are handled, as Syrians and Iraqis are usually prioritised for refugee status.
..
Several German politicians have argued that different ethnic groups should be housed in separate migrant accommodation.
Link1965 decided fate of the subcontinent
ShareComment
Text size: A A A
Last updated on: September 06, 2005 17:48 IST
Though the 1965 Indo-Pak war was only a medium-scale, limited war that lasted less than three weeks, it resulted in the Tashkent Agreement that brought about exchange of territories occupied by both sides.
It is largely seen as a stalemate in Pakistan and the rest of the world, but the 1965 war generated very significant consequences that decided the fate of the Indian subcontinent.
The Pakistani leadership carefully planned the war. It was meant to lead to a massive uprising in Kashmir engineered by sending in Pakistani infiltrators. Further, by clandestinely raising a second armoured division of relatively sophisticated Patton tanks, Pakistan aimed at a breakthrough in Punjab against the weak and obsolete Indian armour and wanted to cut off Jammu and Kashmir from India.
Field Marshal Ayub Khan also was planning to demonstrate -- in the wake of the Indian Army's debacle at Sela-Bomdila in Arunachal Pradesh in November 1962 -- that one Pakistani was equal to 10 Indians in terms of military prowess.
His conviction was that the Hindu, when struck a timely and decisive blow, would not be able to stand up. His confidant Altaf Gauhar has recorded this in Ayub Khan's biography.
Pakistan had China's support. When Islamabad appealed for support, Beijing did try to apply pressure on New Delhi by delivering a not very credible ultimatum to India.
The Americans were well informed about the possibility of Pakistani infiltration into Kashmir and the subsequent offensive months in advance, as has been recorded by the then Central Investigative Agency operative in India, Duane Claridge, in his book A Man for All Seasons.
The American military and political establishment had concluded that in case of a war, Pakistan would win.
The Pentagon and Harvard University played a war game at the Institute of Defence Analysis, Washington, DC, in March 1965. The war game and its results were available in a book, Crisis Game by Sidney Giffin, by the spring of 1965.
The total failure of the Kashmir uprising, the complete destruction of the Pakistani Patton Armoured division at Khem Karan in Punjab and the Pakistan Army running out of ammunition and being saved from total humiliation through the UN ceasefire constitute a turning point in the history of India-Pakistan relations.
Having engineered the war and seen it result in a disaster, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto turned against his benefactor Ayub Khan and blamed him for the Tashkent Agreement. His propaganda was that Ayub Khan threw away a military victory.
The Pakistani people were not informed about the failure of Operation Gibraltar, the attempted infiltration into Kashmir and thereafter of Operation Grand Slam, the attack on Jammu. The Indian counterattack in the Lahore sector was depicted as Indian aggression. The decimation of the Pakistani armoured division by a poorly armed Indian armoured brigade through superior tactics at Khem Karan was also not told to the Pakistani people.
But all these attempts at obfuscation did not deceive a leader like Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, considered the father of Bangladesh. When the question was raised about the security of what was then East Pakistan vis-à-vis India in case of another war, Bhutto, as foreign minister, implied in his answer that Pakistan depended on Beijing to ensure the security of that part of its territory.
That led Rahman to ask for greater autonomy from Islamabad and to formulate his six points which became the basis for the subsequent secession of Bangladesh from Pakistan.
The 1965 war also led to an embargo of US arms supplies to Pakistan. Islamabad's use of American arms against India was against the assurances given by President Dwight Eisenhower to Jawaharlal Nehru that in case Pakistan used US-supplied arms against India, necessary corrective action would follow.
Though the US bureaucracy and the Pentagon were prepared to look the other way if Pakistan had won the war, they found it difficult to overlook the miserable performance of Pakistani armour at Khem Karan. Pakistan therefore turned to China and France for re-equipment of its forces. After 1965, China became the foremost supplier of arms to Pakistan.
From Bhutto's death cell testimony, it also becomes clear that Pakistan initiated its discussions with China on acquiring nuclear weapon technology around 1965. Bhutto talked of completing his 11-year-long negotiations successfully in 1976. It would not be incorrect to say that the Chinese-Pakistani strategy of containing India began in the aftermath of 1965 war.
Pakistan drew correct lessons from the failure of Operation Gibraltar when the Kashmiris did not rise against India in consequence to large-scale infiltration of Pakistani commandos into the Kashmir valley. They bided their time and in the late 1980s trained disaffected Kashmiris, who crossed over into Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, in arms and infiltrated them back.
That this strategy too did not wholly succeed is a different story but it did begin the prolonged proxy war against India in Kashmir.
Pakistan also discovered it was not difficult to run rings around the conditions of American arms supplies and hide things from US inspection teams. They were able to covertly raise a second armoured division in 1965. Unfortunately for them it did not give them the victory in Punjab they expected. The second armoured division met its defeat at Khem Karan.
Pakistan used this experience of getting around US procedures in the 1980s to divert American arms -- meant for Afghans fighting Soviet forces -- to arm the various jihadi militias and to install the Taliban regime in Kabul.
On the Indian side too, the 1965 war led to significant results. The Indian Army failed to assess intelligence effectively in respect of construction of aqueducts under the Ichogil canal (that runs from India to Lahore) and on Pakistan covertly raising a second armoured division. Thus, the external and internal intelligence collection and reporting were bifurcated. A dedicated external intelligence agency the Research and Analysis Wing -- was created.
An ill-advised reorganisation proposal in respect of Indian armour increasing light armour and reducing medium armour - strongly espoused by General Joyanto Nath Chaudhuri before the war, was given up. The Indo-Soviet arms supply relationship got reinforced and the Soviet Union became the sole supplier of arms for India.
Though it is not much written about, India intensified its support to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his Awami League in their demands for greater economy from Islamabad.
The 1965 war demonstrated that the 1962 debacle was not a reflection on the Indian Army but was the result of inadequacies in a few top inexperienced generals. It also proved that Indian unity was solid while Pakistan was vulnerable to divisive forces. It brought out that American short-term Cold War calculations overrode Washington's commitment to democracy.
It also highlighted that the US establishment had very wrong assessments about the Indian leadership, the Indian Army and India's ability to survive as a Union and grow into a major power.
The legendary K Subrahmanyam is the doyen of India's strategic thinkers.
K Subrahmanyam
Not sure why IBN has not made this YouTube available in the US. I'm not able to watch it.
I have stopped reporting on this guy. The more i follow him, more he come out even worse then a yellow journalist. He is literally a joke, and if he has a following, it means Pakistan is a cesspool of mentally bankrupt awaam.Jhujar wrote:Pagal Ahmadi Psycho Patient/Maareez