Indian Foreign Policy

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Post by Rony »

Of late, all diplomatic roads lead to India
Just as the plane carrying the former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami took off from New Delhi, another carrying Pakistan's former prime minister Benazir Bhutto was touching down. Somewhere in between, a team of US negotiators was settling down in the capital, preparing to start discussions on the bilateral nuclear energy agreement with India.
Perhaps New Delhi, too, having upset the foreign policy applecart with a vengeance since it went overtly nuclear in May 1998, also thought it was time to reach out and shake hands with those it had offended in the recent past, such as Iran. What better way to do so than to give Khatami a visa to attend a media conference in the Indian capital, especially since the Iranian leader had an innate gift for nuances?
Then came the sting in the tail : India, he said, hardly had any right to be critical of Iran's nuclear programme, along with the US, because India was not even a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).When it was pointed out to him that India, indeed, had never been a signatory to the NPT, while Iran, as a member, was violating NPT tenets, Khatami laughed his disarming laugh. "It was the Shah,'' he said, "who had signed the NPT'', then added quickly, "but I am not saying that Iran is withdrawing from it''.Only a few years ago, a prickly India would have reacted negatively and shrilly to outside criticism. This time, though, New Delhi let it ride.
This ability to play multiple relations at the same time, that once came so naturally to India - constantly at the crossroads of empires, waxing and waning with new ideas, new religions, new power equations - is still a bit rusty, although Benazir Bhutto's presence in the Indian capital showed, that India, was still susceptible to what the Americans have to say about Pakistan.
So why had Benazir been invited to India anyway? Especially at this exact time, when Pakistan's lawyers were continuing their agitation to embarrass President General Pervez Musharraf.
Perhaps, New Delhi was beginning to feel that it wasn't politically right to put all its eggs in the Musharraf basket. Or, was Benazir, allegedly and recently split from her husband and thereby ready to reclaim the Bhutto legacy, merely a decoy for India to secretly pursue conversations with Pakistan's national security adviser Tariq Aziz?
Laks
BRFite
Posts: 192
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 20:47

Post by Laks »

This could be sour grapes, but then many strange decisions have been take by this UPA government.
Deccan Chronicle, February 28, 2007
Appointments and disappointments
By Rajiv Sikri



Last year’s highly controversial appointment of Shivshankar Menon as foreign secretary generated widespread and legitimate public interest that has been rekindled by one of the affected officers seeking information about the appointment under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The treatment of this issue by the media is essentially focused on personalities, not on the deeper issues of larger national concern that have been thrown up.

The core issue relates to the management of the higher civil services in India, a question that has been debated at least over the last three and a half decades. Not all readers may be familiar with Indira Gandhi’s idea of a "committed" bureaucracy, but when the Election Commission deems it necessary to effect a whole-scale change of the top administrative and police officers in Uttar Pradesh in preparations for the forthcoming Assembly elections, it is evident that nepotism and favouritism determine crucial bureaucratic appointments in the states. Is the rot now spreading to the Centre?

Thankfully, India does not have a spoils system. The most important reason why civil servants have been given permanency of tenure is to enable them to offer honest and independent advice to their political masters. Just a few days ago, in the new performance appraisal norms finalised for the all-India services like the IAS and the IPS, "moral courage and willingness to take a professional stand" is listed as a desirable quality. All this is politically correct theory. Yet, as any savvy bureaucrat will tell you, in practice this does not work.

The tried and tested formula for climbing up the bureaucratic ladder is to play it safe and concentrate on not saying or doing anything controversial. The truth of the matter is that politicians of all hues generally prefer pliant bureaucrats, particularly at the highest levels.

At the very least, there needs to be a serious debate about whether this episode points to a deeper malaise in the functioning of the ministry of external affairs. Is government ineptitude eroding the cutting edge of a key instrument of our foreign policy formulation and diplomacy, when the need of the hour is to make it more effective as India becomes a more influential regional and global player?

Following Menon’s appointment, the two senior-most Foreign Service officers took the unprecedented step of seeking voluntary retirement from service, and two other senior officers, both women, have gone on leave. Outside observers see this as reflecting gross mismanagement by the government, and an avoidable loss of experience and talent at a time when the government and the nation can least afford it. Does the government have a different view?

Many of the officers superseded were clearly meritorious and otherwise qualified, with wide experience and sufficient length of service remaining. It strains credulity that all the 16 officers senior to Menon, who were considered competent enough to be promoted to the highest level (Grade I) of the Foreign Service and were holding responsible positions like secretary in the ministry of external affairs or heads of mission in important capitals, ostensibly lacked the requisite qualities to be appointed as foreign secretary. What are these mysterious qualities?

A fundamental question arises: how should senior appointments be made? Menon superseded 16 officers. Why did the government feel it necessary to screen more than 20 officers from three batches, when the accepted norm is that only five names should be considered for one vacancy? Since seniority-cum-merit is a well-established and accepted guiding principle as well as the current practice for similar appointments, there is no plausible reason why a deep selection procedure should be followed only in the case of the foreign secretary and not for other similar posts in the government.

The cabinet secretary is selected from among the senior-most IAS officers. Last year, it was widely speculated that the present incumbent was given another year’s extension as the government was not comfortable with appointing the senior-most officer, who happened to be a woman, and superseding her would have created an embarrassing controversy. The same principle is followed in the armed forces. In the Army, for example, once an officer reaches the rank of lieutenant general (or equivalent in the Air Force and Navy), it is presumed that he is qualified to become an Army commander or even the Chief of Army Staff, depending on his seniority and age. Similarly, once a judge is elevated to the Supreme Court, the senior-most judge is appointed the Chief Justice of India. The recent appointments of the secretary (R&AW) and the Chief of Air Staff clearly bring out that the government has gone by the principle of seniority-cum-merit in these appointments. Why did the government follow different criteria for appointing the foreign secretary?

A successful tenure as secretary in the ministry of external affairs has traditionally been considered an important qualification for selection as foreign secretary. This is understandable and logical, as the position of secretary is one of great responsibility and requires an additional clearance by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet. Not all Grade I Foreign Service officers are considered fit for appointment as secretary in the ministry of external affairs. This is an important position that carries considerable prestige and responsibility, is an important level in formulating foreign policy, and is a key instrument of India’s diplomacy. Secretaries in the ministry of external affairs are members of the Foreign Service Board and the Departmental Promotion Committee that have the responsibility of recommending appointments and promotions at higher levels. It is completely illogical, even ludicrous, that Menon should have been considered more meritorious than the serving secretaries who were members of the Departmental Promotion Committee that had earlier recommended Menon’s own elevation to Grade I of the Foreign Service!

This time, by ignoring the claims of long-time serving secretaries in the ministry of external affairs, why has the government devalued the position of secretary? How does it serve public interest to erode the stature of an institution built up over decades? Why did the government give a public vote of no-confidence in the work of the serving secretaries? If they were not competent enough to serve at the highest levels of the ministry of external affairs, they should not have been appointed as secretaries in the first instance. Was their performance not up to the mark? That is hardly likely, otherwise they would have been transferred to less onerous and exacting jobs. Moreover, when it was widely surmised that the previous foreign secretary would get an extension, they were expected to carry on in their respective jobs. Suddenly, they were confronted with a situation, for no fault of theirs, where there was no suitable job for them once Menon was appointed foreign secretary. Where is the fairness and justice in this? Or is the government entitled to be cynically indifferent to officers who have loyally served the government and the nation for decades?

Rajiv Sikri is a former member of the Indian Foreign Service who retired last year as Secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs

To be concluded tomorrow
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

Part II of Rajiv Sikiri's article. I wouldnt dismiss it as sour grapes. A guy who has dedicated his life to the service pours out his heart. Maybe we can see what is wrong with the system that superannuates 16 secy having a combined lifetime experience of (16*30) years has to be reviewed. If anyone recalls I had predicted when SS Menon was appointed, that a whole gaggle of officials will be forced to resign and it has happened.

When transparency is foreign
Part - II

As a result of the sorry episode involving the appointment of foreign secretary, legitimate questions arise about the functioning of the ministry of external affairs. It is at present too mission-oriented, when it should be the other way round. In any properly functioning foreign office structure, postings at headquarters, particularly at senior levels, should be at a premium, not at a discount. As it is, many officers do not want to serve as additional secretaries and secretaries in the ministry of external affairs. Would the government’s actions and attitude not reinforce their conviction that there is little to be gained by working at the senior-most levels in the ministry of external affairs?

A large sprawling organisation like the ministry of external affairs, which has multifarious functions and supervises the functioning of more than 160 missions and posts abroad, can function effectively and efficiently only if it is structured and run in accordance with professional management principles. One of these is that top-level decision-making should be collective and consensual. What is needed is a harmonious orchestra, not a frenetic one-man band! There is no reason why the foreign secretary should have a larger-than-life image, assiduously burnished by many previous incumbents with inflated egos. A second is that transitions at the top should take place in a smooth, planned manner. Following Menon’s appointment as foreign secretary, the abrupt and whole-scale simultaneous changes in the highest echelons of the ministry of external affairs, and of our envoys in important capitals like Dhaka, Islamabad, Colombo, Beijing, Paris and Pretoria, was contrary to all sensible management norms and has disrupted much-needed continuity in the ministry of external affairs and key missions abroad.

Over the last three decades or so, the post of foreign secretary has been frequently mired in controversies. Three foreign secretaries were removed from office before the end of their term, six were given extensions in service, and supersessions have taken place on several occasions, though never as blatantly as last year. This has seriously damaged the effective functioning of the ministry of external affairs, undermined the integrity and cohesiveness of its structure, and sapped morale. Why have successive governments treated the foreign secretary’s post in such a cavalier manner? Regrettably, successive generations of officers too (with some honourable exceptions) have acquiesced in this state of affairs, preferring to muffle their consciences while ensconced in comfortable and lucrative posts abroad.

It is inadequately appreciated that the foreign secretary is merely the first among equals, albeit with administrative responsibilities and a coordinating role. The position of the foreign secretary in the ministry of external affairs is analogous to the posts of finance secretary and defence secretary. Both are the senior-most secretaries in the ministries of finance and defence respectively. They look after the work of only one of the many departments in these ministries and have a coordinating role, with secretaries in charge of other departments in the ministries of finance and defence operating independently. Similarly, in the ministry of external affairs, all secretaries in the ministry of external affairs have their independent areas of responsibility, reporting directly to the minister. If the foreign secretary’s post is considered so special why, despite many recommendations to this effect over the years, has the government not elevated it to the same level as the cabinet secretary or the chiefs of staff, or the chairman of the Railway Board? Is it a case of one-upmanship by the powerful IAS lobby?

The foreign secretary is required to administer the ministry of external affairs with fairness, equity and justice. Any foreign secretary beholden to political masters would clearly lack the moral authority, perhaps even the will, to do so. Officers down the line are quick to pick up signals emanating from the top. It is obvious that a flawed administrative system, where pulling the right strings matters more than objective considerations, demoralises officers and staff and undermines efficiency.

The heart of the problem is the non-transparent manner of selection of the foreign secretary last year. Circumstantial evidence leads to the disturbing conclusion that the choice was pre-meditated and arbitrary. The government was also aware that it would be controversial. How else can one justify the inexplicable expansion of the eligibility criteria, the furtive manner in which the decision was taken, and its hasty announcement by the Prime Minister’s Office, which has no locus standi to do so, much less before the formal approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet?

While the government has studiously refused to come out with any explanation of the considerations that prevailed in selecting Menon as foreign secretary, some apologists have been taking the line that, having served as India’s envoy to important capitals like Islamabad, Beijing and Colombo, he had the right background to be appointed foreign secretary. This is a specious argument. Every Foreign Service officer has a different kind of experience in the course of a career. Are Dhaka and Kathmandu not equally important neighbouring capitals? Are not New York, Moscow, Paris or Berlin equally challenging assignments? What about our increasingly important strategic neighbourhood of the Gulf, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia, or the whole continent of Africa? Should one minimise the experience of economic, multilateral and cultural diplomacy? There is no room for tunnel vision in foreign policy. Why should India be obsessed with Pakistan and China? It is pertinent to note that our foreign policy successes have come despite hurdles posed by Pakistan and China. Finally, the fact of Menon’s own postings to Sri Lanka and Pakistan without any background of dealing with these countries underscores the fallacy of such reasoning.

Another reason advanced is that Menon would have a sufficiently long tenure to provide continuity and stability to the post of foreign secretary. This is an equally absurd argument. When the government decided a couple of years ago that the posts of the home and defence secretaries and the heads of the Intelligence Bureau and R&AW would carry a two-year tenure even if that took the incumbents beyond the normal retirement age, the government took a conscious decision that the foreign secretary did not need such a minimum tenure. How can the government now argue that only an officer with nearly three years’ remaining service would be considered for the post of foreign secretary? It also does not explain why the government ignored the claims of more senior officers with an outstanding record of service, breadth of experience, and more than two years of remaining service. This has given rise to allegations of gender bias, which has been extensively covered in the media in recent days.

There are also whispers and innuendos that the selection of the foreign secretary was influenced by extraneous considerations like cronyism, and pressure by regional, political and foreign lobbies. What is the truth? It is not enough to loftily claim that it is the government’s prerogative to appoint whosoever they wish. We are talking here of the highest-level public servants of a country, not lowly employees of a fiefdom. In a functioning democracy, where the rule of law prevails, the government has the responsibility to come out with clear and credible answers to the pertinent questions that have been raised. This is not just a matter concerning the appointment of the foreign secretary. At stake are also the larger issues of transparency, justice and equity in administration as a whole, government accountability, gender equality, and the efficacy of the much-touted Right to Information Act.

Rajiv Sikri is a former member of the Indian Foreign Service who retired last year as Secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs
A bigger issue is the clique in PMO making Rasputin like decisions and gutting the steel frame that holds administrative India together.And none of these is even qualified to appear for the UPSC exams. MMS the expert is to be held accountable for this gutting of MEA cadre.

All I can ask Sikriji is to keep the faith and serve India in whatever capacity he can. And our respects to his wife who also was a victim of this driveby shooting.
putnanja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4668
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3

Post by putnanja »

The problem in India has been that successive PMs always thought they knew foreign affairs the best, and interfered in MEA's a lot. This created two power centers, the foreign minister and PMO. In these turf wars, the casualty has been policy-making. There is still no clear aims and objectives, or strategy that India should look forward to, causing us to not analyze the issues in long term, but reacting to situations in a ad-hoc manner.

Perhaps, no difference from the way any other ministry is run in India!!
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

I am looking for reports or the actual study by a former Indian diplomat conducted in the US about reforming the IFS. He was a resident scholar at some DC think tank. the report came in circa 2004.
Raju

Post by Raju »

>>MMS the expert is to be held accountable for this gutting of MEA cadre.

We need a thread, adequately named, to focus on the office of the PM and MMS himself. There is a need to work out his agenda.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Post by Prem »

Raju wrote:>>MMS the expert is to be held accountable for this gutting of MEA cadre.

We need a thread, adequately named, to focus on the office of the PM and MMS himself. There is a need to work out his agenda.
There should be a thread about systemetic undermining and destruction of various important political, economic,administrative and security institutions of India by UPA Govt: The causes and forces behind these moves .
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

THIS IS THE SUBCONTINENT CALLING NEW DELHI
[quote]Self-interest is pushing India to acknowledge its neighbours

Kanak Mani Dixit

If India had not run off with the name of historical ‘India’, perhaps the rest of us would not have had to invent the term ‘Southasia’. The cultural stream that runs in a continuous penumbra from Baluchistan to the Sunderban and Trincomalee coasts would all have remained ‘India’, while there would have been an alternative for ‘Bharat’. Given the postcolonial rise of divided nationalisms among the neighbours, even the term ‘Indian Subcontinent’ became a burden for many — something the average citizen of India finds preposterous only because he is not able to put himself in the other’s shoe.

But times are changing in India, even as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh prepares to assume the SAARC chair at its 14th summit in New Delhi on April 3-4. To be more inclusive, speechwriters in South Block now have Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee referring to the ‘Southasian Subcontinent’. Two decades after the rest of Southasia was already comfortable with the term to denote our shared geographical and cultural space, India’s intelligentsia is discovering that the name is not as tasteless as some had thought.

India’s sudden acceptance of regionalism is explained by its need to look towards the region to be taken seriously overseas. And an entire class that believed (as does the diplomat Maharaj Kumar Rasgotra) that SAARC was a “gang-upâ€
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Post by Rony »

http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op=read&id=31238

India refuses sanctions on Fiji

India has refused to follow Fiji’s other major trading partners like Australia, New Zealand and the United States by placing sanctions on the country following the military takeover in December.

Fiji TV reports that unlike the other countries, India has not issued any travel advisories, placed entry bans on members of the interim administration and the military or suspended aid to Fiji.

Instead, it has continued to provide assistance for the restructure of the sugar industry, scholarships for Fiji students and help for victims of this year’s floods.

The Indian high commissioner in Fiji, Ajay Singh, says India has longstanding historical ties with Fiji and believes in engagement rather than isolation.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

Didn't know where to post
India must apologize to SAARC for exporting terrorism and destabilizing the region
[quote]Wed, 2007-04-04 14:18

H. L. D. Mahindapala

Predictably, the SARC summit opened with its focus on terrorism. Predictably, the smaller nations plagued by terrorism, have, for obvious diplomatic reasons, skirted round the issue of identifying the chief manufacturer and exporter of terrorism in the SAARC region – India. She is also primarily responsible for the economic and political stagnation of the SAARC region. India’s overt hegemonism and covert terrorism, both of which are linked to separatist movements outside its borders, have delayed the integration of its neighboring countries into a viable unit that could race ahead to achieve results comparable to that of other regional blocs.

Despite the repetitious platitudes it proffers from time to time of historical and friendly relations India has failed to live up to either the historical or the friendly relations needed to make SAARC a regional power. India cannot give the lead due from a benign force because it is mired in its own morass of political hypocrisy and narrow self-interests. India’s meddlesome regional politics has played a central role in retarding progress not only in stabilizing the region but also in alleviating poverty.

The Nehruvian non-aligned policies declared so pompously at Bandung, or its latest manifestation in the Gujral doctrine is as good as principles written on water. For instance, the "Gujral Doctrine", states: “first, with its neighbours like Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal and Sri Lanka, India does not ask for reciprocity, but gives and accommodates what it can in good faith and trust.

Second, we believe that no South Asian country should allow its territory to be used against the interests of another country of the region. Third, that none should interfere in the internal affairs of another. Fourth, all South Asian countries must respect each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty. And finally, they should settle all their disputes through peaceful bilateral negotiations.â€
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Post by Rony »

India is the center of terrorism ! what next ! china the light of democracy !Look at the hypocracy of this srilankan dude! he rants about India this,India that but is completely silent on paki terrorism( ah! is it because the paki terrorists are helping these buggers in killing tamil civilians) and chinese hegemony.These "smaller south asian" countries crawl,bend,beg before the chinese for everything and actively encourage chinese hegemony in the region and they have no problem with that,but when its comes to India they put their h&d before anything else and rant about "Indian hegemony" day in and day out.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

The problem of the smaller states around post 1947 India is that they are worried about getting incorporated into India. The princely states accession had a profund impact on these neighbors for they thought that one day they also would be incorporated too.

That is why India had to come up with many measures (put up with tantrums, Gujral Doctrine etc) to placate them and assuage thier fears. Some die hards are never convinced and seek outside support- West (UK & US ) and PRC.


What Sri Lankans dont understand is there are deep historical ties to India from ancient times and Lanka was recognized as an independent state just as Nepala was and never will be politically incorporated into mainland India. They are off course free to be economically integrated but not politically.

The sad part is that Westphalian constructs were adopted in the post Colonial eras without the necessary historical milieu and that leads to these fears.
Raju

Post by Raju »

It is just Sri Lanka's burnt offering to Pakistan for bombs supplied for bombing LTTE.
Laks
BRFite
Posts: 192
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 20:47

Post by Laks »

Deccan Chronicle
April 7, 2007

[quote]
No right to information
By Seema Mustafa


The Americans have to be admired for their transparency. Despite the embedded journalist concept introduced by President George W. Bush, there is still a certain resilience in the American system that allows the media easy access to information, and prevents US officials from wrapping facts in layers of half-truths and evasive distortions. American journalists, of course, insist it could be better, and that it is not as good as before, but for journalists in other democracies struggling to make their governments more transparent, the US model is definitely one to be admired.

In India, unfortunately, the reverse is true. The politicians and bureaucrats have trained themselves to hide the truth, to camouflage the facts, and to even deny without blinking an eye the truth if it happens to be inconvenient at any given point in time. For the purpose of this column one does not want to go into details of how supine the media has become, for that, at best, can be just one of the excuses for governments that deny information at every given step of the way.

The effort of government is not to present information in a perspective, but to work overtime to ensure that the journalists do not get a whiff of what is happening in the corridors of power, even when it is to the advantage of the government. In that, news must appear when the government releases it, and not a minute before, as this alone is sufficient to throw insecure politicians and their officials into total panic. How many times one has seen the focus shift from the task at hand to chaos over a news item that found its way into the newspapers earlier than “scheduled.â€
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

India-Singapore: Close To Signing Bilateral Defence Pact
Daily News & Updates
India Defence Premium
Dated 8/4/2007
Printer Friendly Subscribe

India and Singapore "are working on a long-term defence cooperation agreement quite expeditiously now." Indicating this, Minister of State for Defence Production, Rao Inderjit Singh, has said here that the proposed memorandum of understanding would entail a "plus" over the existing bilateral accord in this domain.

Mr. Singh, who called on Singapore Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean, said that during the weekend they discussed this issue. An aspect of the new initiative was the possibility of "a little more presence of Singapore armed forces" in India for exercises and training. In a reciprocal gesture for such a greater access to India, Singapore could consider "investing" on upkeep of the facilities now being used by its armed forces.

Noting that Singapore was not on India's radar as a source of high-end know-how for defence production, Mr. Singh said the City-State could, under the proposed accord, "help develop our facilities" for exercises and training. New Delhi was now "getting nothing in return" except "a good hand-shake," for allowing Singapore access to the Indian military facilities, he said.

India's High Commissioner to Singapore, S. Jaishankar, and the Defence Advisor in the Indian Embassy here, G. Ashok Kumar, participated in Mr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Teo. Mr. Singh, who was here to seek Singapore's support for the Indian bid to host the 2014 Asian Games, later left for Myanmar on a similar mission.

On India's defence ties with Myanmar, Mr. Singh drew attention to the ongoing anti-terror cooperation along their border. Myanmar was now responding to the Indian requests for such cooperation by either acting "unilaterally" or allowing New Delhi the right of "hot pursuit" to nab the terror-suspects.

On India's role in maintaining security along the Straits of Malacca, Mr. Singh said: "Whatever help is required of us [by the littoral states of Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia], we are ready to give - whether it is in terms of sharing of costs [as suggested by Malaysian Foreign Minister] or in terms of patrolling [the waterway] physically."
India working on improved strategy for UNSC seat
New Delhi, April 08: In a bid to push stronger for permanent membership of UN Security Council, India along with three other members of G-4 (Group of Four) are working on an improved strategy, involving modification of a resolution to be introduced at the world body.

The G-4, which also includes Brazil, Germany and Japan, is redrafting the resolution with an intention of mustering maximum support for their candidatures for permanent seat in the powerful organisation.

The rejuvenated effort came with Japan recently showing active interest again in the joint endeavour after remaining lukewarm for about a year on its participation in the G-4.

"Some modifications" are to be carried out in the resolution to enable the grouping to muster maximum support for their bid, whenever it is made, diplomatic sources said.

New Delhi feels that the model of UNSC reform should be one that attracts widest support from members of the General Assembly as well as the five permanent members (P-5) of the Security Council besides major groupings like the 53-nation African Union.

The proposals for resolution mooted by India include emphasis on equal rights and responsibilities for expanded Security Council and improvement of its working methods.

A strong proponent of UNSC reforms, India is pressing for increased representation to developing countries in the world body. At present, China is the only nation from the developing world to have representation in the UNSC.

New Delhi insists that keeping in view the contemporary realities, there should be a balanced mix of developed and developing countries in the powerful world body which is responsible for maintaining international security and stability.

Japan showed its interest in active participation in the G-4 recently and indicated this during the visit of External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee there last month.

Japan was having a dialogue separately with the US, apparently trying to use that route to get to the Security Council. However, failing to make any headway in that endeavour, it has shown interest again in G-4.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

India must promote itself as a Soft Power: Tharoor
India must promote itself as a soft power as it seeks to take on the 21st century, the United Nations Under Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information, Shashi Tharoor, said on Saturday.

"If there is one attribute of independent India to which we have not perhaps paid enough attention, it is a quality which we would do well to cherish and promote in today's world - our soft power," Tharoor said while addressing the concluding session of the fourth Hindustan Times Leadership Summit.

A term coined by Joseph Nye, Dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, "Soft power" is the ability to get what you want by attracting and persuading others to adopt your goals.

It differs from hard power, the ability to use the carrots and sticks of economic and military might to make others follow your will.

India's very own candidate for the UN Secretary General's post, Tharoor said that India has to consistently enhance its soft power -- not just by material accomplishments, but also in terms of values and principles for which India stands.

"India must reclaim its true heritage in the eyes of the world. Our democracy, our thriving free media, our contentious NGOs, our energetic human rights groups, and the repeated spectacle of our remarkable general elections, all made India a rare example of the successful management of diversity in the developing world. This has been an immeasureable asset for our country," the swashbuckling and suave diplomat said.

He said that India has become an important proponent in the UN and is playing a role in combating terrorism. "India has to work in tandem with the world order to combat critical issues like terrorism, Democracy and sustainable development."

Tharoor said that India could beat superpowers like the United States, but it has to go an extra mile to achieve that. "With its diversity, India has proved that it can compete with the first world countries like US in terms of soft power."

"The United States has successfully made India and other countries of the third world a ground for its IT industry. Though India is equally competent in all that the United States has developed, we need to do more. We have to promote ourselves as a superpower by developing our soft skills in IT globally," Tharoor, who lost to Ban Ki-Moon in the race for the UN top job, added.
Laks
BRFite
Posts: 192
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 20:47

Post by Laks »

link
CIC notice on Menon appointment
Acting on an RTI application of a senior IFS officer seeking access to file notings on the appointment of foreign secretary, the Central Information Commission has issued notices to PMO, external affairs ministry, DoPT and the Cabinet secretariat.

The CIC in its notices has sought explanation from the four offices over appointment of foreign secretary Shiv Shanker Menon, after the RTI application was fi
Sikri, a 1971 batch IFS officer had approached the CIC on March 9, seeking disclosure of file notings pertaining to Menon's appointment as foreign secretary.

She in her application alleged that Menon, a 1972 batch officer was appointed for the post ignoring officers senior to him.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

Got through email
India STRETCHES its Sea Legs
Steven J Forsberg. United States Naval Institute. Proceedings.
Annapolis: Mar 2007.Vol.133, Iss. 3; pg. 38, 5 pgs

-------
India’s development of Mauritian islands to its southwest could
substantially expand the reach of its navy.
-------

In its race to become a regional sea power, India has at times seemed
more like a tortoise than a hare. The potential acquisition of an
aircraft carrier was an annual story for more than 20 years, and
despite the lease of a Soviet nuclear-powered submarine almost two
decades ago India’s submarine force remains entirely conventional.
But even though plans to buy or develop specific systems seem to fall
through with regularity, the overall growth trend of the Indian Navy
is impressive. History has shown that sea power is not easily
acquired in a hurry, and India’s sometimes slow but generally
systematic growth is a sign of maturity more than a symptom of
ineffectiveness. India is thinking ahead.

In particular, the Indian Navy realizes that sea power is more than
just a matter of ships. It is also a matter of geography. Since the
turn of the 20th century, the Indian Navy has been making more
deployments far from its traditional coastal waters, using its
vessels as tools of diplomacy more than as warfighting machines.
India is systematically cultivating close relationships with key
states that can offer its navy a leg up in future contingencies. This
highlights the country’s long-term naval thinking, which appears
designed to make the Indian Ocean a bastion that can serve as a
springboard for naval projection against distant points.

Another Little Dot on the Map

It is probably safe to say that most people have never heard of the
Agalega Islands. There are two of them, a North and a South Island,
located about 425 nautical miles northeast of Madagascar in the
Indian Ocean. The islands are sovereign territory of Mauritius,
which is about 700 miles to the south. Together, the two Agalegas
have about 70 square kilometers of land area populated by
approximately 300 people. The islands’ remote location is the key to
their importance. They are approximately 1,700 nautical miles
southwest of the Indian naval base at Kochin on the southwestern
coast of the Indian peninsula. They are approximately 1,200 miles
southwest of Addu Atoll in the Maldives. And they are also
approximately 960 nautical miles to the west and south of Diego
Garcia.

The Mauritian government has offered India a long-term lease of the
islands, with an eye toward further development. The Indian
government has not yet announced any decision, and no reports
indicate any military aspect to the talks. The development of the
islands could, however, be an important step for the implementation
of Indian Navy plans. Agalega can serve as a small yet important
stepping stone on the path between India and the important shipping
lanes of the Mozambique Channel on the southeast coast of Africa. In
addition, it can help India more effectively close the wide gap
between Madagascar and its southern tip.

The sea lanes around the Horn of Africa serve as a vital route for
supertankers too large for passage through the Suez Canal. Similarly,
large amounts of commerce shipping between Europe and the east coast
of the Americas travel to Asia by way of Cape Horn, and disruptions
in trade routes across the Middle East would make them even more
heavily traveled. The route is thus of great importance to India’s
two chief regional rivals, Pakistan and China, and the ability to
interdict traffic there is of great potential value. In addition,
southeastern Africa is also valuable in terms of Indian economic
investment and diplomacy, and extending Indian naval power into the
area will help foster and protect these ties.

Looking for Energy

Energy-hungry India is looking toward Mozambique and Zimbabwe for
coal, for example. The port of Beira in Mozambique is probably going
to be substantially upgraded as a number of foreign investors develop
regional resources. Mozambique is also a growing regional source of
liquefied natural gas (LNG). India has been attempting to establish
a significant infrastructure for imported LNG, and looking toward the
future, Africa could become an important backstop for supplies from
the volatile Middle East. Nearby South Africa is India’s largest
African trade partner and is increasingly becoming a political and
economic ally.

India and Mozambique have signed a wide-ranging defense cooperation
pact. It envisages joint maritime patrolling of the Mozambique coast
as well as training and technology transfer. Like many developing
nations, Mozambique is hard-pressed to provide even coast guard-type
services, and the assistance of the blue-water Indian fleet could
prove very useful. In 2003 and 2004, for example, Indian warships
provided security for international conferences being held in
Mozambique. In 2004, India flew ten aircraft to South Africa to
participate in exercises-six Mirage-2000s supported by two 11-78
airborne tankers and two 11-76 transports carrying personnel and
supplies. The detachment stopped in Male, capital city of the
Maldives, and at Mauritius to show the flag en-route to South Africa.

Africa is a long way from India, however, and India has been relying
on friendly nations such as Mauritius, Mozambique, and South Africa
for support in deploying forces. India is beginning to show interest
in acquiring its own limited support infrastructure in the region.
For example, it is reportedly planning on opening an intelligence-
gathering facility on leased land in northern Madagascar. Such a
facility could greatly enhance the ability of India to interdict
vessel traffic along the African coast. Indian facilities in the
southwest Indian Ocean will not rival those found to the east, where
a separate Far Eastern Naval Command is based in the Andaman Islands.
But the existence of even a limited support infrastructure would
greatly enhance the ability of India to conduct operations in the
region.

A Key Role for Small Islands?

How could the Agalega Islands fit into this strategy? To start,
Agalega is not going to become a major base. Indeed, its capabilities
will be limited, even with development. The plan is to develop a high-
end resort in addition to fish processing facilities. This will
entail the construction of such basic infrastructure as electrical
production and water and sewage facilities as well as the expansion
of the current airstrip. The island lacks a good natural harbor, and
it is doubtful India would permanently station many (if any) military
people on the island. But remote scraps of land can be of great
importance in a number of scenarios. In an emergency, India could
deploy a small but significant support detachment to the island for
aerial operations as well as for communications and intelligence-
gathering.

The island is currently serviced by Dornier 228 aircraft operated by
Mauritius. The aircraft are license-built in India, which also
operates a number of maritime surveillance versions of the aircraft."
The aircraft have a maximum range of approximately 1,300 nautical
miles, which is about the distance between the Maldives and Agalega.
Thus, India could stage the aircraft to Agalega by way of the
Maldives, and, operating from those two locations, the aircraft could
cover almost the entire Indian Ocean between southwest India and the
Mozambique Channel. Agalega could also serve as a refueling stop for
flights farther on to Madagascar, the Comoros, Mozambique, or South
Africa.

Agalega is also near the maximum range of the Heron unmanned aerial
vehicle (UAV) when flown from the Indian naval base at Cochin. The
very capable medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) UAV could be flown
back and forth on autonomous missions. In the other direction, Herons
taking off from Agalega could provide substantial loiter time over
the Mozambique Channel, perhaps linking directly to the proposed
facility on Madagascar. India may soon be operating more than 60
Herons in addition to numerous other UAV systems.

It had been hoped to expand the runway on Agalega to serve ATR 72
class (72-passenger twin prop) aircraft and perhaps eventually Airbus
A 319-class (120 passenger twin-jet) aircraft. Any resort
development by India would almost certainly entail at least the first
level of airport upgrades to serve an upscale client base. It would
also allow the island to support operations by larger and more
capable aircraft, which would presumably include whatever aircraft
India picks in its latest competition for a new maritime patrol
aircraft to replace the current 11-38 and Tu-142. That aircraft might
be the new Boeing P-8, one of many efforts by U.S. businesses to
supply the Indian military in a post-nuclear-sanctions world.

Agalega might seem a bit superfluous, since India is developing good
relations with regional nations. Aircraft could operate from
Mauritius, the Seychelles, Madagascar, or Mozambique, but having a
separate, isolated, operating location could help India insulate
itself from possible political complications. Even though Mauritius
would retain sovereignty, it would be at arm’s length (similar to the
British on Diego Garcia). Nations that are friendly to India might
nonetheless be leery of allowing combat aircraft (armed maritime
patrol) to operate from their shores. India could use them for
discrete intelligence, logistics, and support functions while using
Agalega as its "combat" base.

What Is a Combat Base?

Once again, it should be emphasized here what is meant by combat.
Agalega is not going to house entire wings of SU-30 aircraft nor are
any battles like Midway likely to be fought off of southwest Africa.
The most likely requirement for the Indian Navy in that part of the
Indian Ocean is to interdict select merchant shipping. The world
economy is very intolerant of blanket blockades that affect major
shipping lanes. To attempt such a total blockage is to invite
interference from other major powers, particularly the United States.
Instead, nations must attempt to identify specific vessels and then
deal with them, while allowing "protected" or "neutral" vessels
reasonably free movement.

To do this, a nation needs first of all good intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Since the eventual
target vessels will be unarmed (or very minimally armed), large
amounts of weaponry are generally unnecessary. In interdicting ships
going to or coming from Pakistan or China in these waters, for
example, the Indians are very unlikely to find any enemy combatants.
Instead, they will need to weed through all the traffic, identifying
specific vessels to be stopped (boarded or attacked outright). This
is often most effectively done using maritime patrol aircraft and
UAVs. Small patrol craft can handle needed boarding, and it is handy
to have local facilities for intelligence and coordination.

Future Scenario

How might a future contingency play out? Suppose India imposes a
distant blockade on a regional rival. The tourists on Agalega could
be quickly flown off and their quarters filled with an Indian support
detachment. First, the island would serve as a refueling post for
light maritime patrol aircraft and UAV staging to southwest Africa.
second, it would serve itself as an austere operating facility for
said aircraft and UAVs. Flights could be flown between Agalega and
southwest India to detect ships attempting to gain access to the
Arabian Sea via the blue water to the south of India. Rights could
also be flown from Agalega westward, over the Mozambique Channel.
UAVs could be flown on autonomous mode to the channel, where real-
time control and intelligence analysis could be handled by the Indian
facility on Madagascar. With patrol being handled by airborne assets,
Indian surface patrol craft could conduct specific interdiction tasks
while the Indian "blue-water" fleet was engaged elsewhere.

Indian naval growth toward the southwest Indian Ocean could also
serve another important strategic interest. Indian concerns over
possible Chinese intervention from the east mirror the concerns of
the British over Japanese intervention during World War II. The first
option is to block enemy ingress at chokepoints such as the Strait of
Malacca, but what about a "Plan B" if this strategy fails? In mid-
1941 the British Admiralty considered the possibility that Singapore
might be neutralized and that the Japanese would gain free access to
the Indian Ocean. It decided to develop a fallback line that ran
roughly from South Africa to Mauritius to Diego Garcia and then to
the Nicobar Islands. When the Imperial Japanese Navy did indeed
force its way into the Indian Ocean, the British retreated behind
this line, protecting the vital sea lanes around South Africa and to
the Middle East.

Indian Far East Command

It is possible that the Indian Navy is considering a similar
situation. The Indian Far East Command, operating out of the Andaman
and Nicobar islands, is positioned to interdict vessels attempting to
pass through the Malaccan Straits. But its forward facilities are
somewhat limited and, even more important, may in the future be
vulnerable to attack from Chinese aircraft operating from Myanmar. If
Chinese aircraft could neutralize the island facilities and turn the
Bay of Bengal into an aerial contested zone, then there is a
possibility that Chinese units (particularly subsurface) might
transit the Strait of Malacca into the Indian Ocean. In this case the
Indian Navy may decide to retreat behind a defense line similar to
the British one, at least until the situation is favorable for its
fleet to clear the Bay of Bengal. This would keep supply lines open
through the western Indian Ocean and possibly keep Pakistani and
Chinese forces from converging.

Naturally, these are potential future contingencies. The actual
Chinese presence in Myanmar is minimal, despite continued rumors of
bases and outposts in places such as Greater Coco Island, near the
Andaman Islands. China has not yet demonstrated an expeditionary
air force capability beyond its own shores and, even more important,
China and India have reasonably good relations today, even going as
far as to hold joint naval maneuvers. History has shown how growing
rival powers can slide into military conflict, however, and given
some bitter occurences in the past (including Chinese support of
Pakistan), it is reasonable to wonder what the future might bring.
The Indian Navy’s continued development of ties off the East coast of
Africa demonstrates that the Indians are certainly thinking ahead.

Expanding Reach

India continues to systematically expand its naval reach, an
important component of which is its growing presence in the southwest
Indian Ocean. In recent years Indian combat aircraft have deployed to
South Africa and Alaska for exercises. The Indian Navy has conducted
a round-theworld cruise with a training ship. Indian warships have
recently turned up in places as far flung as Guam and Beirut.
Whether India will ever have naval hegemony over the Indian Ocean
remains to be seen. If it ever does, however, it is possible that
small steps (and small islands) such as Agalega will be part of the
path it takes.

Winston Churchill once described Russia as "A giant whose nostrils
have been plugged up." He was referring to the enclosed and cold
waters found on both the Northern and Eastern shores of the nation.
India, on the other hand, is a giant whose nostrils are flared. The
Arabian Sea to the west, the Bay of Bengal to the east, and large
expanses of the Indian Ocean to the south all provide India with free
access to the sea.

Farther from Indian shores, however, are a series of geographic
chokepoints that limit entry into (and exit from) the Indian Ocean.
To the southwest is Cape Horn, to the west the Red Sea. To the east
are the Strait of Malacca as well as the Lombok and Sunda straits. To
the distant southeast are the waters around Australia. In recent
years, Indian naval deployment patterns have demonstrated an
appreciation for all these key points.

The development of a Far Eastern Naval Command based in the Andaman
Islands has extended the eastward reach of the Indian Navy, and now,
developments in Africa are extending its westward reach.

[Sidebar]
Under the Indian Navy ensign, the Talwar-class frigate Tabar
(background) embarks on a mission in 2006. A lease agreement with
Mauritius would give India access to remote Agalega, a naval stepping
stone between the Indian coast and shipping lanes of the Mozambique
Channel.

[Sidebar]
Agalega’s two islands are approximately 425 nautical miles northeast
of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean. The airstrip on Agalega’s North
Island (pictured here) could serve as a refueling post for light
maritime patrol aircraft and staging area for unmanned aerial vehicle
flights.

[Reference]
1. 0 degrees 23 minutes south, 56 degrees 37 minutes east-the
approximate coordinates for the airstrip on North Island.

2. The Encyclopedia Mauritiana at
http://www.encyclopedia.mu/Nature/Geogr ... s/Agalega/

3. Associated Press, "Mauritius asks India to develop remote Agalega
Islands into tourist resort," International Herald Tribune Asia-
Pacific, 25 November 2006.

4. "India eyes coal mines in Mozambique, Zimbabwe," The Times of
India, 11 December 2006,
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS ... 771009.cms
5. Thomas R. Yager, "The Mineral Industry of Mozambique,". U.S.
Geologic Service Minerals Yearbook, 2005.

6. An example is India’s Petronet project.
http://www.platts.com/Natural%20Gas/Res ... /index.xml

7. "India. South Africa cement ties with Strategic Partnership Pact,"
International Business Times, 29 December 2006,
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/2006100 ... p-pact.htm

8. "India, Mozambique sign MoU in defense cooperation," People’s Daily
Online, 7 March 2006,
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/20060 ... 48396.html

9. In 2003 India provided ships for the African Union Summit and in
2004 for a three day World Economic Forum meeting. The latter
deployment was of two "Petya"-class patrol craft, the INS Sujata and
INS Savitri.

10. "Sudha Ramachcandran, "Delhi all ears in the Indian Ocean," Asia
Times, 3 March 2006;
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HC03Df02.html

11. http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Do228.html

12. http://www.india-defence.com/reports/840

13. Ireland Blyth Limited press release, 25 February 2004,
Developpement touristique; IBL va de l’avant avec son projet a
Agalega [in French); http://www.iblgroup.com/news/press/060215150454

14. Ashling O’Connor, "Boeing pitches in as India offers defence
contracts worth $15bn," Times (of UK) online, 4 December 2006;
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 658955.ece

15. British Public Records Office, ADM 1/26876 "Director of Plans,
register LD02445/41," 11 July 1941.

16 Greater Coco has often been reported as housing everything from an
intelligence "facility" to a "base" and a "port," none of which seem
to exist. For example, see Andrew Selth, "Chinese Whispers, The Great
Coco Island Mystery," The Irrawaddy. January 2007;
http://www.irrawaddy.org/aviewer.asp?a=6536&z=102

17. "India, China to hold joint naval exercises," The People’s Daily
Online, 6 November 2003:
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/20031 ... 7719.shtml

18. Rajeev Sharma, "300 Indians Evacuated from Beirut," The Tribune of
India Online, 20 July 2006;
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20060721/main3.htm

[Author Affiliation]
Mr. Forsberg, a freelance writer based in Houston, wrote "Is a China-
India Naval Alliance Possible?" in the March 2002 Proceedings. He is
currently attending the Texas Tech University School of Law.
rsingh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4451
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 01:05
Location: Pindi
Contact:

Post by rsingh »

T
he potential acquisition of an
aircraft carrier was an annual story for more than 20 years
:lol: :lol: :twisted:
Shankar
BRFite
Posts: 1905
Joined: 28 Aug 2002 11:31
Location: wai -maharastra

Post by Shankar »

Re posting from agni 3 thread

agni 3 first of all is not china centric weapon though that is what the news paper reports would like us to believe

It is a tool of indian strategic independence announced to the world stage

Telling the global powers and super power we have the capability to defend our policies and interests and any attempt to force a change can be very costly

China came under the ambit of indian power projection capability with the induction of agni 2 .Agni 3 is not for china

If we assume the usal practice the test was an operational test not a technology demon test as made out to be . It is too well designed and complicated for it to be rough capability demonstration

The timming is perfect -as the 123 agreement is reaching the make or break stage in washington

Even if we assume the range of agni 3 is 3500-5000 km (which is very very unlikely from all the technical evidence it is capable of 8000+km with reduced payload) still it is capable of sanitising almost entire indian ocean ,middle east ,central asia,china and far east.

Agni 3 is a flick of indian ICBM capability carefully veiled so as not to alarm all but a message to those who matter

1500 kg -3500 km also translates to 500 kg and so many km without any modifications and world already knows it

look at the flight profile and compare it with that of a minuteman 3 and topol m and the answer is crystal clear

It is too similar to be a co incidence except a 3rd stage . This one is a 8000+ km bird and next one with third stage will surely be what we want it to be

pakistan and china on the nuclear front was countered long back -it is now turn for the others to be weary of indian might -not just economic
vina
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6046
Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists

Post by vina »

Soviet Canuckistan Back To its tricks again

It seems like that there was a parade yesterday at Surrey with a float depicting Parmar.. who was named as the primary suspect in the AI Kanishka bombing depicted as a martyr, with a couple of Canadian Politicians participating.. Time India hits back hard at Canada for the support and tolerance for anti India terrorism .
From Globe And Mail

DIPLOMATIC FLAP
India protests alleged terrorist portrayed as a martyr in Sikh parade

ROBERT MATAS

VANCOUVER -- The government of India is launching a diplomatic protest over a parade in Surrey this month that included a float with alleged terrorist leader Talwinder Singh Parmar portrayed as a Sikh martyr.

"We are very much concerned that this happened," Zile Singh, India's deputy consul-general, said yesterday in an interview. Diplomats from the High Commission Office in Ottawa intend to raise the matter with Canadian officials, he said.

"This is not acceptable to us. We intend to convey that it is not acceptable, so the [Canadian] government understands," Mr. Singh said. "This should not happen again."

The Sikh community in Greater Vancouver, which is splintered into factions, holds two competing parades to mark the Punjabi new year and the beginning of the harvest in Punjab. Gurdwara Sahib Dasmesh Darbar of Surrey held its annual Vaisakhi parade on April 7. The Vaisakhi Parade organized by Vancouver's Khalsa Diwan Society was held on Sunday.

The parade in Surrey attracted thousands of people including prominent B.C. and federal politicians. News reports say the parade had a float that included Mr. Parmar among the portraits of Sikh martyrs and some organizers wore work jackets with the word "Khalistan," the name proposed for an independent state for the Sikhs carved out of India. Some children were wearing jackets with the logo of the International Sikh Youth Federation.

Mr. Parmar, a militant Khalistani advocate, has been identified in a B.C. court case as the mastermind behind a mid-air bomb explosion aboard an Air-India flight in 1985, en route from Canada to London, England. Born in Punjab and later made a Canadian citizen, he was killed by police in India in 1992. There were 329 people killed in the Air-India bombing, which remains one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in aviation history.

Mr. Singh said the portrayal of Mr. Parmar as a martyr was "very objectionable." Indian officials were also concerned that some people involved in the parade showed their support for groups considered terrorist organizations and banned in Canada, the International Sikh Youth Federation and Babbar Khalsa.

The Indian consulate in Vancouver is aware of the views of those who attend the Surrey temple and does not associate with their events, Mr. Singh said. The diplomats however support events sponsored by the Vancouver temple.

"We know the difference," he said, adding that he thought that Canadian politicians should also be aware of the differences. The politicians should know that the charitable status of the banned groups has been revoked and about the Khalistan issue, he also said.

"All politicians must be aware of what is going on. They know about the Air-India disaster and what happened," Mr. Singh said.

Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh, who was beaten up in the mid-1980s after speaking out against militant Sikh separatists, said he expected "a strong denunciation" from all politicians of any display that involves support for violence and hate."

"I'm personally as a Canadian very, very saddened that this kind of display of violence is deemed to be acceptable in a parade that celebrates diversity," Mr. Dosanjh said.

Mr. Dosanjh cautioned against jumping to any conclusions about the Surrey temple. Temple groups are fairly loose organizations and those who allowed the Parmar poster in the parade may not be representative of the temple.

A person at the temple who did not give his name yesterday said an executive member would be available for a comment today.
vina
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6046
Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists

Post by vina »

More Antics in Canuckistan ..
Sikh coalition wants terror label lifted from outlawed groups

Kim Bolan
CanWest News Service; Vancouver Sun

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

VANCOUVER - A coalition of Canadian Sikhs is putting forward a new "Sikh agenda for the Canadian government" to make a series of demands, including reversing a ban on terrorist organizations and support for the creation of a separate Sikh country called Khalistan, the Vancouver Sun has learned.

A draft of the eight-point program was posted on a popular Sikh chatroom April 12 to elicit support and comments from members of the Canadian Sikh community.

The comprehensive document says it's important for Sikhs in Canada to have a common position in lobbying the federal government and opposition members of Parliament.

"An eight-point Sikh agenda is being launched on the eve of the next national elections in Canada to make public a distinct range of aims and objectives for the Canadian Sikh community," says the document preamble.

"The Sikh agenda has been arrived at after widespread consultation and represents the aspirations of the disparate parts of the Canadian Sikh community. It is hoped the agenda will be progressed over the next four years with the Canadian government, the Opposition and individual members of Parliament."

The most contentious points in the document call for removal of the terrorist ban on Sikh separatist groups and support for the Khalistan movement.

In June 2003, the Canadian government outlawed the Babbar Khalsa, blamed in the 1985 Air India bombing, as well as the International Sikh Youth Federation, some members of which were convicted of political violence in Canada.

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day said Monday the Conservative government has no intention of delisting any terrorist organizations, including the Babbar Khalsa or the ISYF.

"It is certainly not the position of the Government of Canada to delist, nor to get in any way involved in this question of separatism in India," Day said.

"Our position clearly is when it comes to listing terrorist groups, safety and security of Canadians is No. 1."

The online document says Sikhs need to work to "make known and explain the reasons why Sikhs want to establish an independent sovereign state of Khalistan to the Canadian public, political organizations and the Canadian government."

It calls for an "increase of political pressure on the Canadian government to have the ban removed in Canada and to clear the name of the many thousands that previously belonged to and associated with the banned organizations since 1984."

The Sikh agenda also calls for greater Sikh political representation, government funding for Sikh schools and Punjabi language training.

A British group called the Sikh Federation (UK) posted the Canadian Sikh agenda and stresses that community members don't have to support every item in the document.

Federation member Javinder Singh said in an e-mail exchange that the agenda is being pursued in several countries after a conference in Switzerland last month of a new body called the World Sikh Network.

The Canada component of that is the Sikh Lobby Network (Canada) which has about 100 members, Singh said, although he would not provide any local contacts.

"The Sikh Lobby Network (Canada) is made up of Sikh political activists from across the country," Singh said. "They come from gurdwaras and Sikh organizations. The emphasis is on younger Sikhs and professionals, both men and women."

He said the Canadian agenda may change after input from community members.

The agenda comes just weeks after the last remaining separatists elected in the Indian state of Punjab were defeated in local elections.

But despite the demise of the movement in India, pro-Khalistan groups have been showing up in increasing numbers in recent weeks in Canada.

Former leaders of both the ISYF and Babbar Khalsa marched in the April 7 Vaisakhi parade in Surrey, B.C. In fact, the former Canadian leader of the ISYF was one of the parade organizers, all of whom wore new vests emblazoned with a Khalistan crest.

Indian diplomats in Canada have formerly complained to the Canadian government about the increased separatist presence at public events.

Day said the Canadian government can't do much about people peacefully lobbying for Khalistan.

"As you know Khalistan is an imagined homeland. As long as people are not actively supporting a terrorist group, people have the right to freedom of expression. Supporting a group that is listed as a terrorist group can land a person in trouble," Day said.

"We are not getting into this issue at all as far as the issue of Khalistan. That is for people in India to pursue."

kbolanpng.canwest.com

Vancouver Sun
satya
BRFite
Posts: 718
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 03:09

All options open to India

Post by satya »

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/ID20Df02.html
Bluntly put, neither Beijing nor Washington will sacrifice their bilateral relationship over India, despite US efforts to cultivate India as a potential alliance partner. This, arguably, has more to do with enhancing US leverage on India rather than solely containing China. Similarly, in China-Japan relations, the bilateral economic interaction is too high for Japan to seek exclusive relations with India.
Even Russia, which is economically the most self-sufficient actor in the system, an autonomy that stems from its possession of every major natural resource in its frontiers, would be unwilling to forgo its privileged nuclear duopoly with the US. And given the dual-use of the atom, it would thus be unwilling to unilaterally overturn the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) order, as Iran has discovered. However, considering the US has already accepted India as a unique case in the NPT, there is no good reason to assume that Russia will not follow suit.
Finally, it can be opined that the global architecture of international relations, constructed in the aftermath of World War II, and perhaps illegitimate to some, still retains a measure of durability.

Two reasons can be put forward: first, the US, Russia and China as joint managers of the international system are, in the final analysis, status-quo powers that can advance their foreign-policy objectives (including balancing the US or each other) within prevailing institutional arrangements. This despite the redistribution of comprehensive power in favor of the latter two.

A balanced US would prefer bargaining in the United Nations Security Council to the alternative - "multipolar chaos", a system without rules. Similarly, the incentive for Russia and China to rewrite rules would be limited. What is likely to evolve is that the US unilateralism of the 1990s will be replaced by multilateral bargaining on major international issues.

Second, since the advent of the nuclear age, diplomacy among the Great Powers has occurred against the backdrop of the unprecedented destructive power of contemporary military technology, which is perhaps the strongest argument for peaceful systemic change going forward. Suffice it to say, the overlapping bilateral linkages that involve all the major centers of power imply that a "friend" or "foe" choice for India can no longer be pursued without high costs. Rather, India must adopt a multi-vector philosophy - a multi-dimensional principle will facilitate greater maneuvering space within the dynamic web of international alignments, and enable New Delhi to wholly exploit the geoeconomic and geopolitical options that may become available at any given moment.

One can classify such a foreign policy as "neutral", "independent", "autonomous" or even a contemporary "active non-alignment" purged of its ideological baggage.
Raju

Post by Raju »

Zorawar Daulet Singh, who holds a master's degree in international relations from the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, is an international relations and strategic-affairs analyst based in New Delhi zorawar.dauletsingh@gmail.com
Who is this ? A new lifafa ?
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Post by Gerard »

Vipul
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3727
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 03:30

Post by Vipul »

Crisis point: Not enough diplomats in India.

NEW DELHI: There are not enough diplomats to conduct India's foreign policy, and those that are there are hopelessly overworked.

"For every Indian diplomat there are four Brazilian diplomats; for every Indian diplomat there are seven Chinese diplomats. Now we might be wonderful and very efficient, but we are not that efficient or that good. It's really a problem... The strain is telling on us," foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon told Parliament's standing committee recently.

Paradoxically, as India's place in global affairs has grown, the number of officials in the MEA has shrunk. India's foreign trade, Menon told the panel, has increased seven times in the past decade. In 2006, MEA issued 44 lakh passports and 57 lakh visas. High-level visits to India have increased by 165%.

In the past 10 years, India has joined 13 new multilateral organisations. Even MEA's budget has trebled, but MEA personnel have shrunk from 4,866 to 4,746.

In fact, Menon has hit upon what is crying out for instant remedy in India's foreign policy establishment: the appalling lack of boots on the ground to conduct foreign policy.

When India meets other big powers across the table to discuss big-ticket global issues or negotiate tough deals, the table formation is something like this — an average of 10 people on the visitors' end and maybe four at the Indian end. Some embassies in Delhi have more people in their offices than in the corresponding department of the MEA. "It's very disconcerting," said a western diplomat.

If you consider the fact that India's most intensive relations are with the US, China and Pakistan (not necessarily in that order), it's shocking to note that the crucial divisions in the MEA actually run with less than 10 people each.

Indian officials may command a formidable reputation, but this is expecting them to be supermen, which they clearly are not. The result is, a lot of stuff falls between the cracks and foreign policy is mainly about fighting the latest crisis. However, things are due to change.

The government, Menon said, has decided to more than double the number of diplomats and officers in the MEA in the next five years — and this will mean more than just increasing the number of IFS officers. For instance, Indian missions in the Gulf will see an infusion of 220 posts just for visa and consular affairs — India has an enormous three million strong diaspora.

Menon also said a big reorganisation of work allocation was on the cards. For instance, the protocol division, which is mainly about organising logistical and hospitality support to visiting delegations, could see much of its work outsourced to the huge Indian hospitality sector. There are other peripheral jobs that the MEA has collected over the years and a lot of this chaff can be weeded out.

So more diplomats can be freed from escorting foreign dignitaries around and concentrate on what Menon called "our primary functions".
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7127
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by JE Menon »

>>India has an enormous three million strong diaspora.

And that's just in Dubai :roll: :roll: :roll:
hnair
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4635
Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Location: Trivandrum

Post by hnair »

Hey JEM-saar, dont worry - our man is on it
Chairman of Dubai-based Afras Ventures and former Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, Dr. Shashi Tharoor was the official candidate of India for the succession to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in 2006, and came a close second out
Et tu Sashi-yettaa? :evil:
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Post by Rye »

http://afrasgroup.com/

ST may be involved in oil diplomacy --- probably comes to him naturally.
Welcome to Afras Group!

Afras LLC, an Omani company formed in the year 1988 has today established to become one of the reputed suppliers of Oilfield and Petrochemical products in the Sultanate of Oman. Afras LLC represents numerous companies/manufacturers of repute from all over the world and have partners/offices in UAE, Kuwait, Iraq and Houston.

Strategic partnerships with leading manufacturers in the world have enabled the company to be a major source for Carbon Steel, Stainless Steel and Duplex including 6% Moly, Nickel Alloys, Super Duplex and Chrome Moly Pipes and Piping bulk materials. Afras LLC has supplied in excess of 30,000 Metric tons of Pipes mainly flow lines for Oil and Gas to its principle client Petroleum Development Oman, Occidental of Oman etc. Apart from Pipes and Piping bulk, Afras LLC also supplies Valves, Flare Stacks and Flare Packages, Pumps, Electrical and Instrumentation products. Together with our partners Afras Ltd. at Jebel Ali, recently we have added additional service related activities such Snubbing, Hot Tap and Well Pressure

Control Services with a Canadian based company. Also added to our services is Consultancy, Design, engineering manufacture and supply of water/ waste water treatment systems and air pollution control systems in partnership with a reputed firm from India. (Ed: which one?)

The client list includes all the major Oil and Gas producers in Oman, Oman Gas Company, Oman Refinery and all the local and international EPC contractors.

Afras LLC’s well trained staff is fully conversant with all aspects of execution and documentation of the orders which greatly enables to complete the deliveries on time and in an efficient manner much to the satisfaction of all the clients. Afras LLC’s ambition is to be recognized as the company offering the finest services to the Oil, Gas and Petrochemical industries and is always thriving to achieve this.
Raj Malhotra
BRFite
Posts: 997
Joined: 26 Jun 2000 11:31

Post by Raj Malhotra »

I think this would be approppriate thread to discuss whether MMS is sacrificing too much geo-political capital for the nuke deal? For example:-

Damage to relations with Iran and consequent effect on our access to Afghanistan, Central Asia and Freedom fighters in Pakistan is well known.


USA increasing arms supplies to Pak (more than even the cold war days) on the pretext of compensating India vide nuke deal.


Russia supplying engines to Pak (perhaps) on promise of support to India on nuke deal in NSG & IAEA


Swedish Ercission - SAAB supplying AEWs to Pakistan and still getting major multi-billion telecom contracts in India, (perhaps) again as India needs their support or just cannot afford to take panga with them.


Similarly is the case with other nations. Was BJP more successful in isolating Pak?

Whether this whole nuke deal is a ploy by US to keep MMS engaged with a fake promise of pot of gold at the base of Rainbow?

Whether this ploy is similar to one given to Vajpayee wherein Pak promised to dismantle terrorism?

Whether this US game is on since 1980s to engage India in fruitless endeavours while simultaneoulsy underminning us?
Laks
BRFite
Posts: 192
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 20:47

Post by Laks »

Excellent piece by Capt. (r) Bharat Verma.
link
India is shrinking under Manmohan
By Bharat Verma


The ill-conceived demand for demilitarization can only boost the expanding designs of the terrorist state across the border.

Regionalism, linguistic differences, religion and caste differences are being exacerbated for purposes of vote bank politics. The trend is certainly not towards integration and consolidation of the nation-state.

Despite India’s pretensions of an emerging great power, its influence is shrinking—both internally and on its external periphery. Internally, Naxalites and insurgent outfits control more than 40 per cent of the Indian territory. Similarly, its borders are volatile with neighbours nibbling into its territory as well as influence. Arrival of militaries of great powers to battle terrorism and secure energy resources has led to rivalry to dominate India’s surroundings creating additional complications. Besides, inability to work out a viable initiative to enhance its geo-political influence in its immediate vicinity, and seize the initiative internally from the disruptive forces by the instrument of good governance, could lead to unraveling of the great Indian dream by 2030, if not earlier. These negative and divisive trends tearing the Indian state from within need to be firmly arrested and reversed immediately. At the same time, viable strategy to enhance its strategic footprints in the vicinity must be initiated; otherwise India may face the prospect of reverting to its pre-Independence status (or more appropriately pre-British) of splintered territories, principalities and fiefdoms ruled by feudals and their private militias who may well seek outside military support to subjugate their kith-turned-adversaries.

The external strength and posture of a nation are dependent on internal cohesion. Are we moving towards a cohesive society and nation? The answer is ‘no’—the scenario is increasingly looking dismal. Regionalism, linguistic differences, religion and caste differences are being exacerbated for purposes of vote bank politics. The trend is certainly not towards integration and consolidation of the nation- state. The psychological fragmentation and regionalism primarily due to vote bank politics has resulted in overwhelming regional pressures in determining our foreign policy. The primary objective of sound foreign policy is to enhance security and economic prosperity of the country in which every citizen has critical and equal stakes. Looking at Israel solely through the prism of Muslim population—Sri Lanka through Tamil prism or Bangladesh (illegal migration problem) through political prism—are there self-imposed constraints that inhibit India’s growth and influence?

The writ of the state governments is being rolled back towards their respective state capitals by Naxalites, insurgents, and crime mafia. The union’s external influence is shrinking due to shortsighted policies and self-inflicted wounds. India has become net importer of negative influences instead of acquiring power projection capabilities to achieve dominance in its vicinity. A state or a union whose writ on its own territory and geo-political influence in the vicinity is shrinking, cannot ever measure up to requirements of a great power unless it reverses course.

Case East: The stated Indian population of 1.3 billion today reportedly consists of 30 million people from Bangladesh. Demographic patterns stand subverted and changed in Assam, West Bengal, and the lowly populated states of the northeast. Dhaka’s influence (and Islamic fundamentalism) extends into large Indian chunks of territory diluting New Delhi’s hold. However, the amazing part is that it is a self-inflicted wound by New Delhi that enacted IMDT for vote bank politics totally disregarding agitation by its local citizenry. The damage was done by the time Supreme Court struck down this unfair act 22 years later.

Indians were expelled from Myanmar a long time back and New Delhi practically did nothing. Later, Myanmar, a land bridge to ASEAN in our neighbourhood stood isolated by New Delhi. While India perched itself on false high ground moralizing on democratic norms, China indulged in realpolitik and made huge inroads at our cost. Our recent attempts to engage Myanmar while laudable are yet to pay dividends. Very recently despite ONGC’s investments in the oilfield there, the military junta under Beijing’s pressure has allotted the entire produce to China. The Foreign Office, in this shrinking influence syndrome, will require running many extra miles to merely remain in the competition.

The difference between China and India is that the former builds roads beyond its borders and the latter’s roads stop short of reaching its own borders. Practicing realpolitik the Chinese spread their influence by building bridges across Asia. Indian policy-makers coin words like defensive-defence and disallow even roads to run up to their own borders, lest the adversary use it to travel inland. Chinese also appear to have an unwritten law that restrains its vassal states under its influence to share oil and gas wealth with India unless its own demands are met. Whereas we, with our appeasement policy do not tire of proposing that China and India should jointly exploit and share the energy resources. On the energy front India is being successfully muscled out from Myanmar, Bangladesh, and Central Asia—as a result of insecure, tentative and inward looking policies, premised on ‘carrot’ and ‘appeasement’.

Case West: Pakistan first expelled or subjugated its own minorities. Its agents then extended their reach by conducting ethnic cleansing in the Valley to obtain and secure a launch pad to seize the writ from the Indian state and subsequently threaten the Indian heartland. The ill-conceived demand for demilitarization can only boost the expanding designs of the terrorist state across the border.

Many in India are seduced by the belief that Islamabad finally wants to talk peace with New Delhi—which is absolutely flawed. Unfortunately for Pakistan, its policy of jehad and export of terror worldwide after 9/11 have come home to roost. Internally Pakistan’s army is overstretched between Afghanistan-Pakistan border and internal security duties. With clear multiple vertical divides within Pakistan’s populace and society, the jehadi factory, and different echelons of the army—it is in some difficulty in keeping the Indian borders on the boil. If one monitors the jehadi chatter with a discerning ear, the message coming out is clear, i.e. to defeat the western forces led by America. This for the time being has acquired primacy over the anti-India agenda. India, they seem to be confident, being an utterly soft state can be dealt with subsequently. However, the anti-India cause they reckon must be kept alive through their lobbies and sleeper agents, lest New Delhi becomes too comfortable! It’s a well thought out tactical ploy as it struggles on multi-fronts.

India has extended major aid to Afghanistan in its reconstruction programme. Millions of dollars of the taxpayer’s money along with manpower is being poured into Kabul as a sensible strategy. However, with resurgence of Taliban in Afghanistan with the backing of Islamabad, this taxpayer’s money may well go down the drain. The problem with New Delhi’s policy in its geopolitical arena is characterized by strange self-doubt. The policy invariably consists of only the ‘carrot’ and omits the ‘stick’ which is vital for success in exercise of international relations. If New Delhi is not willing to flex its military, intelligence, and diplomatic sinews, jointly with western forces or individually, to defend the gigantic re-construction work it has undertaken, it will be muscled out once again.

Case North: Nepal that is culturally a mirror image of India faces virtually similar problems. Maoists, notwithstanding their participation in the interim government continue to control and run parallel government. Kathmandu’s writ does not run in major chunks of Nepal’s territory, particularly the hill districts.

By humiliating its national army and making them surrender their weapons, the Koirala government has opened itself to Maoist blackmail. It is merely a matter of time before the gun-wielding Maoists throw Koirala and the rag-tag liberal political parties out of power. With 38 Gorkha Battalions in the Indian Army, and large number of Gorkha personnel in police and para-military forces, how it will play out, is anybody’s guess. However, what is certain is that the sole beneficiary of this churning will be China. In terms of India’s foreign policy, it is blunder of epic proportions. The stark question is, if New Delhi cannot handle Nepal then what exactly can it do?

Our northern neighbour China more or less has arrived as the new super power. While New Delhi’s influence continues to shrink due to divisive policies and indulgence in vote bank politics, Beijing with its calibrated and well thought out approach is extending its influence in Asia and consolidating it in South Asia. In Asia-Pacific, most of the economies including Japan’s are performing well due to the China factor. China’s proxy Pakistan has kept India on its toes. Bangladesh and Nepal are likely to end up as China’s new vassal states. Saudi Arabia and other Islamic states are now tilting towards China and moving away from the West. The same is true for many countries in South East Asia, West Asia, Central Asia and Africa. China’s naval reach stands enhanced, through ports like Sitwe in Myanmar, Gwadar in Pakistan and Hambantota in Sri Lanka that provide new manoeuvring space into the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean as such, lowering India’s maritime pre-eminence. If China remains strong and India becomes weak, China will overwhelm India. The reverse will not happen if India is strong and China is weak. This bottom line must always be kept in mind.

Case South: America is in and can use the port facilities in Sri Lanka, which are strategically more attractive with regard to the Indian Ocean. China has in a mutually beneficial move also tied up with Colombo. It appears that here too India is being muscled out from its backyard. What surprises one is that the Indian Navy that wants to be the pre-eminent force in the Indian Ocean and the Indian Air Force that wants a transoceanic and aerospace capabilities could not monitor the LTTE rag-tag air force taking off on the next door island, hitting out at the SLAF and retreating to their hide-out without detection! It is time India steps in to ensure that the Sinhalese and LTTE are brought to the negotiating table. This is primarily India’s responsibility and is a litmus test for the mandarins of South Block, as break-up of Sri Lanka will be strategically disastrous for India.

(The writer is Editor, Indian Defence Review.)
Raju

Post by Raju »

RIFT AT THE TOP

10 JANPATH Vs 7 RACE COURSE

IS DESTROYING GOVERNANCE

By RAJINDER PURI

Speculation about differences between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Mrs Sonia Gandhi has often surfaced in the past.

Opposition by the Left Front to the policies of Dr Singh, Mr P Chidambaram and Mr Montek Singh Ahluwalia has generally been cited as the cause of tension. The Left did entertain serious reservations about policies of this trio. But Mrs Gandhi successfully smoothed ruffled feathers of the Left without seriously compromising the government.

Now however, an emotive issue has arisen to divide the UPA government at the very top. The issue is Ottavio Quattrocchi.

Readers might recall what this scribe wrote immediately after news of Quattrocchi's arrest broke on the night of February 23rd. On February 25th I wrote: "There seemed to be a tug-of-war within the government over how to handle the issue." It turned out that the news of the arrest was leaked only on the day that Quattrocchi was released on bail – on February 23rd.

Subsequent disclosures suggest that the differences have assumed the dimensions of a rift between the PMO and 10 Janpath.

This rift surfaced after an incident involving one MV Rao. On February 21st, two days before the news broke of Quattrocchi's arrest , and before he was released on bail, newspapers reported that a fraudulent person posing as an "adviser" to the Prime Minister was contacting people.

The Prime Minister's Press Adviser, Mr Sanjaya Baru, told the media: "It has come to the attention of the PMO that one Dr M.V. Rao has circulated visiting cards and greeting cards describing himself as adviser to the Prime Minister. . . . There is no such adviser to the Prime Minister." The PMO asked the agencies concerned to identify the imposter and take necessary action.

However, on February 27th Mr Baru told The Indian Express that "no complaint had been filed in this regard with the Delhi Police". But the police did arrest MV Rao from his Green Park house in South Delhi on February 23rd. According to the Express report, "the Delhi Police was directed only to register a case of impersonation at Parliament Street Police Station".

In subsequent raids at Rao's house and office the police recovered Rs 1 .92 crore, which was handed over to the I-T Department.

However, on the very next day, February 28th, PTI reported that MV Rao had been arrested on the basis of a complaint filed by the PMO. The PTI report therefore set the record straight. Despite Mr Baru's disclaimer of February 27th, the PMO had in fact filed a complaint against Rao. So what happened between February 21st and February 27th to persuade the PMO to downplay the MV Rao episode? It is reasonable to infer that some pressure had been exerted. Who could exert pressure to override even the PMO? Only one guess is required.

MV Rao, 75 years old, has been described as an educated man who speaks fluent English. He is not exactly small fry. He is linked to the Dynasty. He was active in the 1980s as an arms dealer during the HDW submarine deal. That notorious deal , still under investigation, was made when Mr SS Siddhu, personally close to the late Rajiv Gandhi, worked in the Defence Ministry. The police investigation named Mr Siddhu in court as a witness required for further questioning to wind up the case.

While the investigation was still under way , the UPA government appointed Mr Siddhu as Governor of Manipur, a post which he holds to this day. Governors are not questioned by the police.

What the police forgot to tell the media was that during the raid on MV Rao's premises, apart from Rs 1 .92 crore, the police also seized a migration slip and other papers. The migration slip was in the name of Massimo Quattrocchi, son of Ottavio Quattrocchi.

The police inferred that Rao went to receive Massimo at the airport when he visited India during the days before his father was released in Argentina . Among the papers seized by the police there was also a letter written in Italian. Without a copy of the letter in hand it could be presumptuous to report on its broad contents.

It may be noted however that the coincidence of the government releasing news about Quattrocchi's arrest on the very day he was released on bail in Argentina seems unusual. The government was informed of Quattrocchi's arrest on February 7th. It delayed disclosure till February 23 rd. Any attempt to prevent his bail therefore was ruled out.

Last heard Rao was in Ashlok Hospital in South Delhi. Is he still there? Is he under detention or a free man? What is the status of the PMO complaint against him? If detained, under what charge is he held? If free, did the PMO level a false charge against him? If India had a genuine opposition, answers to these could be demanded.
hnair
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4635
Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Location: Trivandrum

Post by hnair »

:D Allrighty!! So chai-biskoot is finally coming to God's own backyard.....

(could not get the URL due to a rather weird navigation in the site, but it is from Kaumudi Online)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Seeking to promote studies and debates on international affairs, a forum on the lines of the India International Centre in New Delhi will soon be set up here.

The Board of Trustees of Kerala International Centre (KIC) includes former diplomats of Indian Foreign Service like K P S Menon, T P Sreenivasan and Thomas Abraham.

It would aim at creating a forum to bring together those interested in foreign affairs and share their interests and insights, Sreenivasan told a press meet here.

The focus of its activities would be international relations as they impact India and would seek to provide a perspective on the regions and issues in which Kerala had a special interest like the Gulf and Sri Lanka.

He said Kerala had been a window to the world since ancient days.By virtue of the presence of Keralites in different parts of the world and Kerala's natural and intellectual resources,the state had much to contribute to making and promoting India's foreign policy, he said.

Besides holding seminars and conferences, the forum would offer guidance for competitive examinations, consultancy services and a modern library service.

Governor R L Bhatia will inaugurate KIC on May 19 here.


Oh wait, it already started!! Kindly notice the talk subjects, berry imbartant onlee 8)

(from the same site)
No immediate plan to enter politics: Tharoor
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Former UN Under Secretary General, Shashi Tharoor said he had no immediate plans to enter politics "but I am not closing any chances." He was answering a question during an interaction with the audience after delivering a talk on "Globalisation, Terrorism and the Human Imagination" organised by Malayalam daily 'Mathrubhumi' here.

Fielding questions on his experience in the United Nations, he said that in handling international issues, one had to be both an idealist and a realist.
:idea: Kerala's first Foreign Minister with a "progressive twist" :twisted:
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Post by Gerard »

http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/stories ... 304000.htm
Importantly, India has agreed to waive accumulated Cuban commercial debt worth $62 million. A significant part of this debt is owed to private Indian companies.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

Diplomacy needs a corps
[quote]Business Standard / New Delhi May 03, 2007
The foreign secretary, Shiv Shankar Menon, is reported to have told a parliamentary standing committee that his ministry is under-staffed. He is also reported to have said: “We are not that efficient or that good. It’s really a problem. The strain is telling on us.â€
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

Chennai Center for China Studies is open now.

Take a look at their output.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Post by shyamd »

Tyranny of the timid
P.S. SURYANARAYANA
in Singapore

Political objectives and strategic realities can provide the impetus to India's economic diplomacy towards ASEAN.

HOANG DINH NAM/AFP

ASEAN Secretary-General Ong Keng Yong: "There is much more to the bloc's ties with India than just the proposed FTA."

IT may look odd that politics should be seen as the best means to drive economic diplomacy between India and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Indeed, conventional wisdom in the current post-Cold War politics is that robust economic relations may help create a suitable climate for the resolution of political disputes even between adversarial nations. However, India cannot afford to lose sight of the big picture of politics in the Greater East Asia region. A timely economic pact with ASEAN can help New Delhi stave off the risk of getting marginalised by the major powers in this region.

China is a dominant economic and political player in East Asia, a geopolitical arena of undisputed relevance to the future course of inter-state relations in all aspects across the world. China is currently the largest trading partner of Japan, another key player in the region and a long-time military ally of the U.S., which is among the other main players in East Asia, along with South Korea and Australia. It is in this milieu that ASEAN, which was founded on the principle of unity in diversity in order to co-exist with big powers such as China and Japan, is in a position to set the terms for the collective entity's economic diplomacy towards India.

Efforts are on to reconvene the ASEAN-India Trade Negotiating Committee in order to try and finalise an accord on goods, as different from services and investments, by the July deadline that was set in January by the political leadership on either side. Senior officials have held crisis-busting talks since January and have felt that it is worthwhile to conclude sooner rather than later a free trade agreement (FTA) on goods. India and ASEAN have been in talks on this issue for a few years.

In a sense, the regional bloc has hustled India. ASEAN is known to have always tried to hold its own against the major states, despite its weakness as a collective entity of much diversity and relatively powerless members. The grouping often revels in what can be seen as the tyranny of the timid, knowing full well that the major powers, each an external player in relation to South-East Asia as a sub-region, cannot ignore the collective will of these less powerful countries, which nonetheless occupy a strategic maritime zone of importance to the "global order" or the lack of it at any given time.

For ASEAN, India is not in the same league as China, which was at one time "feared" by some members of this group. In a larger political sense, ASEAN began a purposeful engagement with India after it began its "economic liberalisation" in the early 1990s. While not all the 10 ASEAN members were equally enthused by the prospect of drawing an external player like India to the South-East Asian scene, some among them did calculate that New Delhi could be of geopolitical use to the forum.

It requires no clairvoyance to recognise that some ASEAN members had, in the early 1990s itself, begun to see India as a potential power that might want to checkmate China in the Greater East Asian region. By the time New Delhi and ASEAN decided to launch the FTA negotiations over three years ago, India's stature as an emerging political power with much economic potential as well had only grown in the region's perspective.

In ASEAN's subtle calculus of power play, there is, of course, no demon among the external players. The history of sometimes strained and often unsettled equations among these players - China and the U.S., Japan and China, besides New Delhi and Beijing - has gradually strengthened ASEAN's desire to engage all of them in more or less equal measure over time.

In more recent years, ASEAN has started looking upon Russia, a Eurasian power, too as a potential player of importance. In so seeking to engage these external players, ASEAN does not, of course, concede that it is willingly, or perhaps unwittingly, trying to play off one or more major powers against the other(s) in the Great East Asian theatre. The basic thesis by this regional bloc is that durable peace and stability in Greater East Asia can be ensured only through a balance of interests, as somewhat different from a balance of power, among these major external players.

ASEAN has accordingly positioned itself in "the driver's seat" to form a cluster of fora that could address various issues of direct relevance to the stability and prosperity of the Greater East Asian region. Unsurprisingly, therefore, ASEAN's "outreach" has extended towards not only Japan and China in the early stages of the group's existence, but also the U.S. and India later on, and thereafter towards Australia and Russia, in that order.

Arguably, Australia first figured on ASEAN's political radar at about the time when South-East Asia "re-discovered" India as an ancient cultural force with a new political relevance to Greater East Asia. However, for this very same reason, India is ahead of Australia in ASEAN's informal list of major powers. India's growing profile as a major maritime power of the military kind is of particular importance to ASEAN, whose geopolitical space is defined by sea lanes of critical value to global trade.

Asymmetry

EUGENE HOSHIKO/AP

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (left) and China's Premier Wen Jiabao before their meeting at the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, central Philippines, on January 14. China's "insider experts" such as Cai Bingkui emphasise that the country's diplomacy, in the development context, has the component of "confidence-building measures" with regard to neighbours.

Yet, if India has found the going tough in negotiating a trade pact with ASEAN, the reason has much to do with the asymmetry between the two in political and economic terms. Unstated though is the regional bloc's sense of propriety about having offered India a wider geopolitical space for the future.

India is often seen across Greater East Asia as a sophisticated player with the potential to match the best among the major powers over time, but its economic profile is viewed as something far less promising in scope. As seen from the ASEAN standpoint, Japan, the world's second largest economy after the U.S., and China, a byword for phenomenal macro-level economic growth, continue to tower massively over India. For reasons of proximate location and economic vibrancy, South Korea, too, is seen to be more important than India at this stage.

India finds itself swimming along such cross-currents of economic realities of direct interest to ASEAN. ASEAN Secretary-General Ong Keng Yong told Frontline that there is much more to the regional bloc's ties with India than just the proposed FTA. The plus factor in his reading relates to the dynamism of India's services sector and the perceived potential of India to rise to the status of a global power. At the same time, Ong emphasised that ASEAN no longer regarded India as a secondary economy and China as the best economy for the purposes of the group.

While Ong's articulation of the ASEAN position is suffused with political wisdom that might benefit the regional bloc, he is not oblivious to the hurdles for an FTA.

The ASEAN leaders have emphasised the need for "a strategic approach" of looking at the big picture in Greater East Asia so that the FTA could then be clinched. For the regional outfit, the primary negotiating line is that New Delhi can and should make big tariff-related gestures in regard to products like, for instance, palm oil, which "India itself does not produce in any substantial quantity". The ASEAN refrain, unstated openly, is that India can hope to make political and strategic gains in Greater East Asia on the foundations of such an economic pact.

Some Indian opinion-makers share this view. Official India, too, is not unaware of the possibility of a strategic trade-off, as it were, in regard to the proposed FTA. New Delhi, however, is looking at the possibility that Chinese products could inundate the Indian market through the track of liberalised tariff on "ASEAN-made products".

Advantage china

The concerns relate to the proposals for liberalised "rules of origin". The worry is that any major concession with regard to the "value addition" by ASEAN countries might enable these players to process Chinese-origin products suitably and export them to India. China would then be the unintended beneficiary of the Indian gesture towards ASEAN. So runs the argument behind the scenes.

P.V. SIVAKUMAR

ASEAN+3 Finance Ministers lock hands at the Asian Development Bank's meeting in Hyderabad in May 2006.

However, China is no stranger to the Indian marketplace. New Delhi and Beijing have also recognised the importance of a vibrant bilateral economic agenda. ASEAN tends to think that its proposed FTA with India need not, therefore, be held hostage to the economic gamesmanship, if any, between New Delhi and Beijing.

Authoritative Chinese sources told this correspondent that Beijing, too, faced the complicating issue of a huge asymmetry between China on the one side as an economic powerhouse and geopolitical player and ASEAN on the other as a negotiator with no comparable profile. China is understood to have "accommodated" ASEAN on the FTA issue by looking at it under the prism of the larger strategic picture relating to Greater East Asia. Some critics point out, though, that China's political system is more amenable than India's to hard negotiations with parties on a plane of asymmetry.

In an alternative viewpoint, China's "insider experts" such as Cai Bingkui emphasise that the country's diplomacy, in the development context, has a key component of "confidence-building measures" with regard to neighbours. This is an aspect that India can usefully study.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's proposal for the long-term creation of an "Asian Economic Community", with Greater East Asia as also India as the nucleus, has been received well in ASEAN circles. And the planned ASEAN-India FTA is being seen in South-East Asia as a test of New Delhi's political will to attain this objective.

In the larger political and strategic perspective, the success of India's economic diplomacy will depend on how well New Delhi navigates through a tough terrain in order to establish a niche role for itself in Greater East Asia. There are subtle moves, initiated by friends of Washington, to draw New Delhi into a possible concert of democracies, perhaps just an informal one for a start, in this region. The idea is that India, the U.S., Japan and Australia are the ideal candidates. India's response will be watched by ASEAN.
kshirin
BRFite
Posts: 382
Joined: 18 Sep 2006 19:45

Post by kshirin »

ramana wrote:Chennai Center for China Studies is open now.

Take a look at their output.
Why? It is B. Raman (bless him), B. Raman and then B. Raman. Chinese produce prodigious and high class strategic analysis and military lit a lot fo it in English. We dont have anything comparable.
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Post by Rony »

Taiwan's opposition leader to visit India, Singapore
Taiwan opposition leader and presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou plans to visit India and Singapore next month to learn from their experience in economic reform, a newspaper reported Wednesday.

Ma - the candidate for the Kuomintang (KMT), or Nationalist Party, in the 2008 presidential election - has scheduled the trip for mid-June, the United Daily News said.

A KMT official told the News that to Taiwan, India is a new friend and Singapore is an old friend, and the Indian economy's takeoff and Singapore's success in attracting foreign investment could serve as a model for Taiwan in developing its economy.

Neither India nor Singapore have diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but they maintain close trade links with Taipei.
Post Reply