Indus Water Treaty

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 22445
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Indus Water Treaty

Postby chetak » 29 Nov 2019 12:24

Barath wrote:
Nikhil T wrote:Can any gurus enlighten why India got into a seemingly unequal treaty? 25% water share with >80% population share? There must be more to it.


Wiki seems straightforward

Pakistan was insisting on historical right to all the waters of Indus tributaries. (the pre-partition distribution). Plus they were arguing that West Punjab would be desertified so they needed the water . On the flip side, India was the upper riparian state and thus had control of the waters. But de facto there was not much development projects on either side to actually use the water. India proposed partition of rivers with 3 eastern river being given to india and 3 western rivers beng given to Pakistan. The World bank essentially agreed to Indian proposal...

Because of long negotiation, India had large development projects for irrigation etc being held up.

The flow in the western rivers is more and thus the water 'share' is more. But India still gets to use/utilise those waters, but not to consume them up, except for domestic and limited agri use. To this day, India is still not using the share of that water fully. (though hopefully it will soon).

If you count population, then population of Pakistan that used these rivers will be huge compared to population that used the rivers in Indian control. Plus India is allowed to use water of 3 western rivers for domestic use , ie for local population.

Pakistan wanted to drag India to International court, ( where they would have likely used pe-partition distribution). India refused.


wiki has not touched upon the cashmere factor and the ameriki influence brought to bear to concede such outrageously and foolishly generous terms to the pakis.

cha cha che che had a hand in this as well. His innate ego was cleverly appealed to and off went most of India's share of the waters.

the guy was an unmitigated disaster.

ArjunPandit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3492
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: Indus Water Treaty

Postby ArjunPandit » 07 May 2020 16:23

https://www.samaa.tv/news/pakistan/2020 ... -pakistan/

India has stopped 14,000 cusecs of water flowing into Pakistan via River Chenab, officials at the Pakistani Ministry of Water Resources said Wednesday.

The flow of water in Chenab has been reduced to 18,000 cusecs, the officials said. It was at 31,800 cusecs on Tuesday.

Due to this, the rice crop is feared to be affected in areas stretching from Marala to Panjnad headworks in Punjab.

India has diverted this water to Baglihar and Ratle dams, the officials added


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests