sanjaykumar wrote:There seems to be a new improved white man's burden, to chide and guide India to some type of Christian civilisation, minus the negro executions. The Mohammedan names writing for NPR, WaPo, BBC, NYT shoot well from the white man's shoulder.
But this narrative evaporates with every terrorist attack on western interests. Too bad for the likes of Aizazzan Hassan. They have to painstakingly build the story again. Perhaps Ms Khan can explain the culture behind the recent Kabul bombings or the Indians' role in the same. I suggest swilling the urine of camels fed on cannabis plants before attempting it.
minority names have flooded the Indian channels in the past several years in the anchoring and reporting segments and all of them are very opinionated and against the majority. Playing up "lynchings" and other "atrocities" even when the root causes are elsewhere.
take the example of one empty headed bimbo named faye d'souza and her constant rabid anti modi litany of grouses and outright slanted views couched as "freedom" of the press.
this venomous creep has never looked in a mirror and seen herself for what she truly is.
they are the new coolies and frontierspeople and this new avatar of the ancient colonial enterprise of spinning the news on a daily basis using "Indian" channels and allegedly "Indian" reportage by allegedly "unbiased" commentators only shows how the successfully runditv model is spreading like an outbreak of cholera.
By the sheer weight and expense of the currently deployed resources against India, the BIF have shifted into high gear to damage Modi and the new narrative that is fast evolving after many tens of decades of BIF wrought social decay and failed history rendering.
At some stage soon, they will have to clearly show their hand.