Payload is still at a premium at the high altitudes where the LCH is expected to operate. If working in a counter-UAV mode at that altitude, the lighter the AAM, the better.John wrote:The missiles are completely two different classes, Apache’s carry them in wingtip so need a lighter missile where as LCH which cannot do that has to use it’s pylons to carry AAM so it’s better to use heavier a missile. Mistral is not man portable missile (requires a tripod) and weights around 20kg twice as much as Stinger.
It will interesting if we integrate something along the lines of R-73 for Apache and fire them from the pylons, as Russians do use it from Mi-28.
That said, I am not in favor of the stinger for other strategic reasons. It is yet another munition that has been added to the diverse zoo of munitions in the indian inventory. This essentially guarantees massive inefficiencies during wartime, when separate supply lines will have to be maintained for separate weapon platforms, even if they are operating together. I can just see the scenario where fully operational LCHs will be awaiting munitions to catch up at a base while fully stocked Hellfires and Stingers are sitting nearby unable to be mated with them. Reverse situation for the Apaches as well.
