Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Locked
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6108
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Manish_P »

Two birds in the air.

https://twitter.com/hvtiaf/status/15296 ... 0xP_lWRYgg ---> Handsome Twosome #LCH.

Image
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

Beautiful shot. Wow.
Khalsa
BRFite
Posts: 1776
Joined: 12 Nov 2000 12:31
Location: NZL

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Khalsa »

Some amazing news coming of an Indian LCH unit stood up near HAL at almost 50% or 70% strength via various twitter sources.

added later: here you go
https://twitter.com/IndianDefenceRA/sta ... 7471520769
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4434
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Prem Kumar »

Swarajya reports that the IA has raised its first LCH squadron in June, which will be moved to LAC next year.

What does "raising a squadron" mean? Are all helicopters (I believe its 10 to a squadron) inducted? Or is it more of a ceremonial function where the squadron is setup?

https://swarajyamag.com/defence/lch-ind ... -next-year
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

Prem Kumar wrote:Swarajya reports that the IA has raised its first LCH squadron in June, which will be moved to LAC next year.

What does "raising a squadron" mean? Are all helicopters (I believe its 10 to a squadron) inducted? Or is it more of a ceremonial function where the squadron is setup?
Raising a squadron is largely a ceremonial function. It is more to do with the fact that the unit has been established. Depending on the platform, either all are inducted, a large number is inducted or just a few examples are inducted. Each platform is unique (in terms of delivery), so there is no hard and fast rule as to how many are available on raising day.
Bala Vignesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2132
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Bala Vignesh »

Rakesh wrote: Raising a squadron is largely a ceremonial function. It is more to do with the fact that the unit has been established. Depending on the platform, either all are inducted, a large number is inducted or just a few examples are inducted. Each platform is unique (in terms of delivery), so there is no hard and fast rule as to how many are available on raising day.
Admiral Saab,.

The receiving unit is usually established about a year to half a year before the first deliveries take place. The unit is then responsible for all the activities from signing off on deliveries and then working up the platform and finally induction of the platform.

Iirc, the work on reactivating no45 squadron began as early as 2011, before the squadron became operational in 2016.
KSingh
BRFite
Posts: 507
Joined: 16 Jun 2020 17:52

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by KSingh »

Prem Kumar wrote:Swarajya reports that the IA has raised its first LCH squadron in June, which will be moved to LAC next year.

What does "raising a squadron" mean? Are all helicopters (I believe its 10 to a squadron) inducted? Or is it more of a ceremonial function where the squadron is setup?

https://swarajyamag.com/defence/lch-ind ... -next-year
According to this the IA is already going back on their assurances for LCH orders (as IAF has done with LCA MK.2), 114 they said now number is already being cut to 70, likely going to slip more as Apaches start to eat up CAPEX


https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ ... 623822.ece
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

Bala Vignesh wrote:Admiral Saab,.

The receiving unit is usually established about a year to half a year before the first deliveries take place. The unit is then responsible for all the activities from signing off on deliveries and then working up the platform and finally induction of the platform.

Iirc, the work on reactivating no45 squadron began as early as 2011, before the squadron became operational in 2016.
Bala-ji, that is true. I was referring to the squadron raising event. The armed forces being steeped in traditions and customs, have such ceremonies. A ceremonial raising event does not necessarily translate into an active operational squadron with her full complement of aircraft.

When No 20 Squadron was raised at Lohegaon...she had a sizeable - if not all - quantity of Rambhas present. Yet when No 17 Squadron was raised at Ambala, not a single Rafale was present. The reverse was true when No 101 Squadron was raised at Hasimara. It depends from one platform to the next. Largely ties into deliveries and how much time and opportunity the squadron has had to work with the platform being inducted.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7850
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Anujan »

LCH in Green

Image

from IN twitter account
@IN_Eastern Naval Command
@INEasternNaval1
The CinC was briefed on the Naval LCA programme & progress made on the design & development of Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter #TEDBF at ADA, the indigenous helicopter design development, production & repair/ overhaul activities being undertaken by HAL (2/3)
#AtmaNirbharBharat
https://twitter.com/INEasternNaval1/sta ... 7791275008
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

https://twitter.com/SJha1618/status/154 ... NcGrFIeBtg ---> Bulk orders for the Light Combat Helicopter are still two years away. Perhaps some 150 units may be given the go ahead over and above the 15 LSP units that have either already been produced or are under execution.
basant
BRFite
Posts: 997
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by basant »

150 units, Admiral. :D
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12688
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Pratyush »

Indeed :rotfl:
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

basant :D
KSingh
BRFite
Posts: 507
Joined: 16 Jun 2020 17:52

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by KSingh »

basant wrote:150 units, Admiral. :D
I’ll believe it when I see it. These paper commitments from Indian armed forces are worth less than nothing.
Atmavik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2010
Joined: 24 Aug 2016 04:43

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Atmavik »

basant wrote:150 units, Admiral. :D
are those 150 units of Mithai..
basant
BRFite
Posts: 997
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by basant »

Atmavik wrote:are those 150 units of Mithai..
I am unable to find unit for units. ;)
A Deshmukh
BRFite
Posts: 603
Joined: 05 Dec 2008 14:24

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by A Deshmukh »

basant wrote:
Atmavik wrote:are those 150 units of Mithai..
I am unable to find unit for units. ;)
normally unit is kg in standards units. but when it comes to admiralty it means tons.
basant
BRFite
Posts: 997
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by basant »

^^^
:D
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

That is true Deshmukh-ji :D
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 19788
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Rakesh »

https://twitter.com/raflanker/status/15 ... RS3b4hoEgQ ---> The order for 15 LCH was given on 30 March 2022. But the fun part is that HAL pre produced the aircraft, so now they will deliver them before time. Ab Dekhate Hain, how many will appreciate this fact :lol:

Image
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60037
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by ramana »

KSingh wrote:.....
According to this the IA is already going back on their assurances for LCH orders (as IAF has done with LCA MK.2), 114 they said now number is already being cut to 70, likely going to slip more as Apaches start to eat up CAPEX


https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ ... 623822.ece
Let us not go into that dhoti shiver mode.
Apaches have a different use and are needed.*
The LCH will be the larger number.
The small deployment along LAC has done a lot to work out tactics etc by Army.
Frees up IAF for other roles.
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9158
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by nachiket »

What I fail to understand is the inexplicable delay in integrating and testing an ATGM (any ATGM) on the LCH. ATGM's are the bread and butter of any modern Attack Helicopter. I do not know if this can be blamed on HAL or the IAF or both but someone dropped the ball on this. This is almost as bad as Scorpenes being commissioned without new torpedoes though in that case the IN at least inducted the submarines.
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2463
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by bala »

I am noticing a trend in services decisions. The most obvious thing, at least from onlookers like moi, are glaringly omitted or feigned ignorance. Everyone is left scratching their heads, and looking at each other and asking duh, what happened. The list is endless. We have the entire gamut from small arms, helos, tanks, guns, artillery, aircrafts, submarines, aircraft carriers, etc. The most ostensible thing is overlooked deliberately. We all know the consequence of not looking for the most obvious but somehow everyone in decision making are behaving like proverbial ostrich in the sand, oblivious of the rest of us.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4434
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Prem Kumar »

There seems to be some timidity in the way we think - that's the pattern I see. We see it in Tapas (there is no armed version). LCH without ATGM.

There is no "Lets induct a large number of these platforms, bristling with teeth" type mentality. And its not funding related. It seems more like a mental block.

We seem content to barely hold our own against adversaries. There is some resistance to having overmatch, even against Pakis. This, of course, works great for Pakis, their 3.5 masters etc, but isn't befitting our stature & aspirations.
JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3168
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by JTull »

Instead of timidity, I think armed forces are betting the house on another border skirmish so they can make their dalal friends happy with all the emergency purchases.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12688
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Pratyush »

That seems to be a reasonable assumption to make. Because nothing else is making any sense at least from the service POV.

PS: it's quite amazing to see the transformation of the BRF of the last few years. From certain line's of thought being totally banned from discussion. To such points being discussed very openly.
kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6278
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by kit »

JTull wrote:Instead of timidity, I think armed forces are betting the house on another border skirmish so they can make their dalal friends happy with all the emergency purchases.
for sure yes. The call for Apache's is going up in tempo!! ., i do hope no Indian military service orders any American combat aircraft or helicopters., having seen the reach of their mil industrial complex they will be energised to promote conflict in the neighbourhood and bleed out national wealth.

Read ., new arms sales to Pakistan., so in many ways a paradoxical risk to India., the more money goes to America the more they promote conflict with Pakistan or China as the case may be. India should do better without their arms baggage
S_Madhukar
BRFite
Posts: 678
Joined: 27 Mar 2019 18:15

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by S_Madhukar »

Completely agree with Prem Kumar ji, how can we be so timid when the country is marching ahead?!

<Rant alert>

Looks like all these multilateral exercises and seminars is compromising the brass . From Natasha to Crystal to Tamer cultivation is happening. After this 'onsite' experience' the chaps are more loyal to maal than desh. They may think NRIs are doing it why can't we. I say fine be loyal to GE-414 but then also be loyal to Tejas. Nope we want the full pkg! Total balidaan! Instead I was hoping they learn something about ambition, initiative and imagination.

I want to know is the brass supposed to commit to FIXED WHOLE numbers of anything at all at any time ?
Like I have 30 sq. made of 18 aircraft each.... no may be 10 on monday, 12 on friday, 20 in 2030?
If I do a fleet review tomorrow, can I say I have 0.5 sub in the dock and 0.5 underwater? 0.8 in the sea because the 0.2 torpedoes are not ordered yet.
I have 10K soldiers, 1K are on holiday, 8K are here, 1K I don't know must be having chai somewhere? - I am sure that does not happen in IA.
I have 10K guns, 8K are ready but tires are to be ordered, 2K are disassembled waiting screws.

I also don't understand what happens at the end of exercises. So IAF says well we are going to have MRFA anyway so these failures are not important, we missed by 100m, no worries we are getting maal in 10 years time. Or is it all paper games, online Combat sim on steroids ?

Are there any management KPIs with timeframes? Continuous improvement(not imports!)?

I hope PMO can say you want Apache. OK. What is your foolproof plan of getting A, B, C done and when?

<Rant over(controlling myself!)>
Hari Nair
BRFite
Posts: 340
Joined: 20 Aug 2010 17:37
Location: Bangalore

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Hari Nair »

naraswami wrote:
Notwithstanding all the speculation on social media (and BRF) there have only been 2 quasi-official statements re. the LCH stalemate that I can recall over the last few years (I paraphrase here):

1. ACM Bhaduria commented about LCH being technically ready, but that "Services issues and work needed to be completed"
2. HAL CTP HVThakur commented on Twitter that "... last DPP milestone(s? can't recall) left"

The actual flying articles have been busy and have been places. All this points to the issue being a commercial one, not a technical one. My speculation is that the LCH is different and new enough, and HAL leadership justifiably feeling that since they now have delivered a true first in the country - a true product platform with multiple variants - that they can throw that weight around and blow past any past commitments, has resulted in expected PBL contracts/pricing negotiations "cold war" between HAL and MOD .... and hence the slow-down.

From that POV, and notwithstanding the continuous Lutyens-bridge Analytica campaign being waged against the Services on BRF, I will submit that it does not matter when an article is produced...the acquisition clock starts when an official and full quote is delivered to the buyer. When did that happen? Perhaps that's the question that ought to be asked in Parliament, or by a journalist... where are we on the official milestone process? Whose court was the tennis ball last seen?

If the reality was anywhere close to what the loudest on BRF believe, there would have been a 1,000 leaks out of Bangalore like that in the past. That quiet in itself speaks volumes.
HAL did not "throw weight around", in the LCH project. HAL, in this case took the proactive and bold decision to commence production of the LSPs at the tail-end of the test programme of the four LCH prototypes. This decision was taken prior to the signing of the contract, which indicated the confidence HAL has in this project. This has turned out to be a good thing as the LSPs are ready for delivery, without further consequent delays.

Yes HAL is very justifiably proud of the LCH - and why on earth should they not be? Let me assure you that this helicopter's performance has been quietly appreciated by the Services, based largely on the feedback of their own Test Pilots, who flew and participated in the Test Programme.

Aircraft are not just automatically 'developed' - its not an armchair exercise. There is a lot of sweat and toil to fine-tune the aircraft for what it is intended to to - in this case to operate efficiently and effectively in the extreme high altitudes of Ladakh and Sikkim sectors. I know for a fact just how the LCH handles and flies, having had flown the prototypes in Ladakh during the various test flights. Having also flown Russian helicopters in the very same sector in operational roles in the IAF, I am well aware (as do the IAF and Army test pilots) of the vast performance gap that exists- heck the LCH even given the ALH a run for its money in certain aspects, at high altitude. Even the pilots of the supporting / chase Russian helicopters that participated in such test flights with the LCH became aware of the vast performance and handling gap.

Let me assure you all milestones have been completed and the LCH LSPs that are being delivered are very much fully operational. No commitments were 'blown past', as you speculate.

The last couple of years delay in the LCH contract was in part due to:
a) The clearance from CCS - which has its own modalities and does take some time.
b) PMO's office queries and observations that were required to be cleared, even after all the other clearances were complied.
All this is not unusual and is just routine. We are talking about very large sums of money the nation needs to commit to this project.

I suspect the some of the delay was perhaps due to constraints in the respective Service's Capital budgets with priorities for other ongoing acquisitions to be completed, etc.

Leaks in the past - I presume you are alluding to the HTT-40 programme, which was being opposed vehemently by a then serving Chief (highly unusual in itself). I wonder if you are aware that the Pilatus trainer aircraft contract that the IAF had originally signed, which also the then Chief had ardently supported, did not even include in-country maintenance, overhaul and repair? We essentially enhanced the Swiss's standards-of-living by going back to them for all, other than 1st and 2nd line maintenance! That's what an African or banana republic's armed forces usually do. Not to speak of increasing our dependance on foreigners for even third and fourth line maintenance!

There is also the little known fact that a very good initiative by HAL to improve and introduce a proven trainer on a fast-track basis (prior to even the HTT-40) was torpedoed by the same aforementioned person. That project, had it been allowed to go through, would have us building a trainer in large numbers today (with all IPRs), with full in-house support for all levels of maintenance, without having had to go through the expensive and time-consuming process of development and flight testing of prototypes.
fanne
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4438
Joined: 11 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by fanne »

Hari Nair sir, thanks for all the nuggets. Please feel free to post more of these (within the gambit of OSA). I am very sure, that whatever you have said is going viral.
I have a few questions
1. Can HAL on its own test any ATGM on LCH or it has to get some special permission (say from Army/mod/iaf)?
2. Some ATGMs have been tested from ALH and MI-17, how fast can it be integrated into LCH?
3. The rumor that army is not interested much in LCH because Rudra can do the same at far cheaper cost? True? Some tradeoff are obvious, Rudra does not have enough space left for transport once you load it for attack roles. Plus it looks like performance-wise, it is a notch over Rudra.
4. In the world of Manpads etc., how effective is it in the Himalayas? deserts?
5. Compared to Apaches, where it is better (in performance)
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4434
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Prem Kumar »

Great post, Hari Nair Ji! Thanks for the insights!

Is there any truth to the claim in The Hindu that HAL will take 2 more years to complete the RFQ process for the full production order for LCH? Isn't such a huge time-window unnatural, especially considering past delays + the fact that the birds have been tested like crazy and LSPs are being delivered as we speak?
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9158
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by nachiket »

Hari Nair sir, good to see you here again and thanks for clearing up the misinformation. Would it possible to comment on the delay in integrating an ATGM on the LCH. I would guess the integration would be necessary before the IAF accepts the helicopter?
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7850
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Anujan »

Hari Nair wrote: Leaks in the past - I presume you are alluding to the HTT-40 programme, which was being opposed vehemently by a then serving Chief (highly unusual in itself). I wonder if you are aware that the Pilatus trainer aircraft contract that the IAF had originally signed, which also the then Chief had ardently supported, did not even include in-country maintenance, overhaul and repair?

I recall some of this saga covered in the press

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/s ... 2013-07-30
IAF chief NAK Browne has argued in favour of procuring more Pilatus PC-7s.
The Indian Air Force's (IAF) new basic trainer has blown the dust off old institutional rifts, with Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne asking Defence Minister A.K. Antony to buy more Swiss Pilatus PC-7s rather than rely on the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)-manufactured HTT-40.
https://www.business-standard.com/artic ... 068_1.html
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) was indigenously developing 181 BTA for the IAF, dubbed the Hindustan Turbo Trainer–40 (HTT–40). On March 5, 2009, IAF laid down stringent performance benchmarks, dubbed Preliminary Air Staff Qualitative Requirements or PSQR.

These began getting diluted in September 2009, when the ministry of defence (MoD) permitted IAF to import 75 BTA through a global tender. Within days, the IAF issued a relaxed ASQR, in a document numbered ASQR 18/09. While the Pilatus PC-7 Mark II would not have met the earlier PSQR formulated for HAL, the new ASQR seem almost tailored for Pilatus.

‘zero-zero ejection seat’.
pressurised cockpit
good external vision from the instructor’s rear cockpit,
Glide ratio
in-flight simulation
increasing the take-off distance
reducing maximum speed

These were lowered in the October 2009 ASQR because the IAF was going for global procurement. Lower standards would bring in more vendors and generate competition.
:x :rotfl: :cry:
I dont know whether to laugh or cry
ks_sachin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2904
Joined: 24 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: Sydney

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by ks_sachin »

Great posts naraswami.
Good to see a different perspective.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12688
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Pratyush »

I am always amused by either the services or some posters claiming that the credibility of the vendor was shot after one bad product.

In the western world i am aware of a defence manufacturers designing and building a failed product. Yet they go on to build a successful product in the second run.

But in India our services are so special that once a bad product is built. The vendor will never be given another chance. Or they will be reminded of a failed product from 50 years ago. As an excuse to deny them an opportunity to build something new.

This is stupid beyond belief.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12688
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Pratyush »

So this is an issue with the organisational culture. Who is responsible for such culture?

What incentives existed for change in culture?

Unless you are able to look at such issues, i am afraid we are just having surface level discussions.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4434
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Prem Kumar »

So, has the gripe-fest @ BRF brought back enqyoob-al-baghdadi from his cave complex?
la.khan
BRFite
Posts: 477
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 05:02

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by la.khan »

Prem Kumar wrote:So, has the gripe-fest @ BRF brought back enqyoob-al-baghdadi from his cave complex?
No, I think enqyoob-al-baghdadi sent his subordinate, a yak herder from Ulan Bator, to straighten things out @ BRF :)
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12688
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by Pratyush »

I don't think so. The language and syntax is too different.
ks_sachin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2904
Joined: 24 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: Sydney

Re: Light Combat Helicopter: News & Discussion: 10 August 2020

Post by ks_sachin »

So who is Enqyoob and I have always wondered who is Ulan Bator..
Locked