Bharat Rakshak

vera_k wrote:Well, it looks like "marriage" is not well defined in India, and the legal system is struggling as a result of it. A standard contract form needs to be drawn up that lays out the terms of the deal -

a. How many kids the two parties desire to have.
b. What assets both parties are contributing to the marriage.
c. What types of sex is contemplated and how often.
d. How many times either party can refuse sex.
e. Pre-agreed remedies upon dissolution of marriage.
f. Anything else I missed?

chetak wrote:

vera_k wrote:Well, it looks like "marriage" is not well defined in India, and the legal system is struggling as a result of it. A standard contract form needs to be drawn up that lays out the terms of the deal -

a. How many kids the two parties desire to have.
b. What assets both parties are contributing to the marriage.
c. What types of sex is contemplated and how often.
d. How many times either party can refuse sex.
e. Pre-agreed remedies upon dissolution of marriage.
f. Anything else I missed?

what you have laid out is a prenup

kit wrote:

chetak wrote:
what you have laid out is a prenup

So is this marriage definition and issues applicable for all religions?

vera_k wrote:Well, it looks like "marriage" is not well defined in India, and the legal system is struggling as a result of it. A standard contract form needs to be drawn up that lays out the terms of the deal -

a. How many kids the two parties desire to have.
b. What assets both parties are contributing to the marriage.
c. What types of sex is contemplated and how often.
d. How many times either party can refuse sex.
e. Pre-agreed remedies upon dissolution of marriage.
f. Anything else I missed?

vera_k wrote:Understand. But no reason to let them set the agenda. Few other items can be added to make it religion neutral too -

g. Is husband expected to be monogamous?
h. Is wife expected to be monogamous?
i. If answer to either is no, what types of other relationship are contemplated? List names and others involved acknowledge this marriage.
j. Division of assets after marriage ends if more than 2 people are involved.

NDTV News feed
@ndtvfeed
Rape law ordinance: Govt rejects JS Verma panel's recommendations on marital rape, review of…
http://goo.gl/fb/mMWAA

Vikas Bhadauria
@vikasbha
*मैं मोदी को मार सकता हूं और गालियां भी दे सकता हूं*- महाराष्ट्र कांग्रेस प्रदेशाध्यक्ष नाना पटोले का आपत्तिजनक बयान.

Vikas Chopra
@Pronamotweets
93 Christian Ladies return to Hinduism in Vishakahpatnam
Ghar Wapsi mission spearheaded by Global Hindu Heritage Foundation

Her father worked at Harvard Medical School, but left to work at AIIMS and work in a public hospital in India. Her mother, after learning that Nundy's cousin was born of cerebral palsy, started the Spastics Society of Northern India.[8]

Education[edit]
She received a degree in economics from St. Stephen's College, Delhi University.[9] After a short stint as a TV journalist[9][10] she studied law at Cambridge University,[10][9] and later pursued LL.M. from Columbia University, New York.

There are three things that matter to her: “I’m in it for meaning, money, and metamorphosis.”

Accomplishments[edit]
In November 2019, she also met German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, during her 2-day visit to India.[17] Nundy was included by an Economic Times jury in a list of 'Corporate India's Fastest Rising Women Leaders' which cited her as being 'famous in the corporate world for her expertise in commercial law'.[18][19] In 2020, Forbes Magazine named her on their list of "Self Made Women 2020."[20] Forbes Magazine also called her a “Mind that Matters” and Mint described her as the “Agent of Change.”[21]

Nundy enjoys songwriting as a hobby saying, "I wrote a jazz song for my father’s 80th birthday. It was interesting because my father’s positive qualities are quite traditional. The song was partly about that, and partly about him raising me to be a free and strong woman.”[7]

nandakumar wrote:

banrjeer wrote:Saw interview of Mr Tyagi ex-muslim Wasim Rizvi on Jaipur dialogues. When asked about how muslims perceive China and Uyghyrs. He responds with something on the lines of .... Bete waise Chini to hamare dushman hain, par unhone is kaum ko sahi pehchan kar ilaaj kar rahe hain.
Wont get into the what he said:

Whats more interesting are the ads I was served during this. e.g. How peacefuls can earn more money at home without needing the spouse to go outside and work and such like...

The moral: the backend is clueless and does not know what ads to serve to a certain people. Its complete non existence like dark matter. And what little presence there is, is mediated by lib*andu folks... what is this ? erasure? followed by what ? ...surprise ?
Just calling this out as an observation..

A famous Advertising Guru once said, "50% of the ads don't work. But the trouble is knowing which 50%". The other thing is that the guys who commit the expenditure on behalf of the clients have no skin in the game. They are not paid based on what incremental revenue they bring to the table.

The Hawk Eye
@thehawkeyex
.
@iitdelhi
'Literati' event 'Polarised Politics'. Fair enough to have diversified opinion but what's point when all 3- Ajay Gudavathy (JNU Prof, TheWire OpEd), Kawalpreet Kaur (AISA, Riots UAPA accused), & Ashok Swain (doesn't need intro) having pathetically propagandist stance??

In her letter to the Prime Minister, Banerjee said, “I express my strong reservations to the approach followed by the Central Government in proposing such amendment to the Cadre Rules which unilaterally mandates the State Government to make such number of officers available for deputation as prescribed under Central Deputation Reserve. Not only is the proposed amendment against the spirit of cooperative federalism but the same also upsets the time-tested harmonious arrangement which has existed between the Centre and States in the matter of posting of IAS-IPS officers.”

Explaining her reasons, Banerjee wrote, “By insisting on officers to be made available for deputation through the proposed amendment, not only will the administration of States be affected but also it would become impossible to assess and plan the administration of a State – by engaging such officers who form part of the Central Deputation Reserve, fraught with the uncertainty. of their sudden deputation by the Centre.”

As per the current guidelines, the Centre every year asks states for an “offer list” of officers from the All India Services (IAS, IPS and Indian Forest Service) cadre who are willing to go on central deputation, after which it selects officers from that list.

The proposed insertion in the rules state that, “Each State Government shall make available for deputation to the Central Government, such number of eligible officers of various levels to the extent of the Central Deputation Reserve prescribed under regulations referred to in Rule 4(1), adjusted proportionately by the number of officers available with the State Government concerned vis-a-vis the total authorised strength of the state cadre at the given point of time. The actual number of officers to be deputed to the Central Government shall be decided by the Central Government in consultation with State Government concerned.”

The proposed insertion further said, “In case of any disagreement, the matter shall be decided by the Central Government and the State Government or State Government concerned shall give effect to the decision of the Central Government within a specified time.”;

Press Trust of India
@PTI_News

SC agrees to consider according hearing to plea seeking use of ballots instead of EVMs for polls

SC agrees to consider according hearing to plea seeking use of ballots instead of EVMs for polls

vijayk wrote:

Press Trust of India
@PTI_News

SC agrees to consider according hearing to plea seeking use of ballots instead of EVMs for polls

srikandan wrote:

SC agrees to consider according hearing to plea seeking use of ballots instead of EVMs for polls

If the SC nixes EVMs allows ballot boxes, then we know something very sinister is up for 2024 elections. Surely the SC knows the problems with ballots, so what is the urgency to hear this?

vera_k wrote:Seems like a constitutional issue saying the use of EVMs was never approved by Parliament. However, I'm not sure the actual implementation of an election needs Parliament approval, as otherwise every little change to election procedures would need to go to Parliament.

vijayk wrote:The scammers are using courts to repeatedly keep the issue of credibility of EVMs in the news. SC is obliging them in spite of how many times this was brought up. Does the nature of judgement changes just because the composition of the courts changed?

Pratyush wrote:
I will be deeply shocked if the EVM is nixed.

Because every time the EC has asked the critics to participate in hackathon of the machine. The critics have not shown up to the event. Therefore they have never been able to prove any vulnerability of the system.
But EC is a constitutional authority. It might be able to stand up to pressure of the SC.

Atmavik wrote:

Pratyush wrote:
I will be deeply shocked if the EVM is nixed.

Because every time the EC has asked the critics to participate in hackathon of the machine. The critics have not shown up to the event. Therefore they have never been able to prove any vulnerability of the system.
But EC is a constitutional authority. It might be able to stand up to pressure of the SC.

I argued about the hackathon with an IIT trained evm critic but his response was that the ec is not fair with rules of the hackathon. When I mention abt delhi, bengal and rajasthan results while Modi in power the response was that this is a controlled loss to give credibility to evm .

I understood that the opposition of such critics is ideological and the goal is to defeat Modi by what ever means all logic be damned. No amt of argument will convince them , all they need is one such person to be at the helm to achieve there goals

srikandan wrote:Looks like Akhilesh is trying the same stunts as Mamata with a fake "exodus" from party to BJP as means of getting insider info on BJP's strategy. Such late switchers are hopefully given the mushroom treatment (kept in the dark and fed krap) given the experience with Babul Supriyo and other TMC scum. All this drama about split in the family is just that.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ind ... 005456.cms

Ambar wrote:Aparna Yadav, daughter-in-law of Mulayam Singh Yadav from his second wife's son Prateek Yadav joins BJP. While the media is making a big deal out of it, Aparna Yadav is a political lightweight but BJP must be careful not to repeat the same mistake they did while admitting everyone from TMC just before the WB polls. I still believe that it was Prashant Kishore who orchestrated Mukul Roy's joining BJP, scuttling the BJP boat from within and then jumping back to the TMC ship. I wouldn't put it past him to try the same tactics elsewhere.