Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2011

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Gagan »

The US presently occupies three bases in Pakistan.
Image

1. Bandari airfield at Shamsi - Predator and Reaper drone launch and recovery.
2. Pasni airfield - where the U2 spy plane was based. There is a picture of this on a BR Monitor cover.
3. Shahbaz PAFB, Jacobabad - where the US troops had built a 911 memorial in the shape of the twin towers, where the Pakistani army wasn't allowed to visit, and recently the pakistani armed forces decided to breach canals and flood villages to protect this airbase during last year's massive floods.

In addition, the FBI and other intel agencies keep a strict watch on every passanger departing on any international flight out of pakistan, the US keeps a close watch on Port Qasim and other points of exit of cargo. All this to prevent some abduls from spiriting out N material or other WMD related stuff out of pakistan. The level of control that the US has on Pakistan is mind boggling, Pakistan is today in reality the 51st state of the US.

Think about it, this is tighter level of control than what the British had on pre independence united India at any point in history.
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 886
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Narad »

Suppiah wrote:Gagan has shown what it takes to be a Mullah as opposed to just a suicide bummer mujahid...I hope someone in IA sees this..and more importantly someone can post this in every paki forum for the abduls to get even more mad at their bangle-wearing generals. (hope the courier has reached Assfcuk by now)
And the Goonga Behra Birather responds to this:- :D
The fcuker who operates the drones sits on Pakistani soil- the murdered of hundreds of innocent Pakistani is in PAF airbase- thats disgusting- Pak Army is becoming a Penguin Army -
I hope some suicide bomber or self respecting courageous PAF Pilot blows the whole drone base off the ground- {Inshallah, Amin}]
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Gagan »

To blow that whole drone base off the ground, the soosai bummer or pious pilot will need a hydrogen sulphide bum, which I believe the pakistanis have in plentiful supply early in the morning after a heavy meal of pindi chana and halal gosht at night.

Err, Kiyani was gifted two Mercedes SL500s for his services hain?
Image
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shiv »

Narad wrote:
The fcuker who operates the drones sits on Pakistani soil- the murdered of hundreds of innocent Pakistani is in PAF airbase- thats disgusting- Pak Army is becoming a Penguin Army -
I hope some suicide bomber or self respecting courageous PAF Pilot blows the whole drone base off the ground- {Inshallah, Amin}]
Internet warriors of Pakistan need to read the memoirs of their own hero - which is a very interesting read and a historic document in its own right - the memoirs of Sajad "Nosey" Haider who led he Pathankot attack in 1965. Haider writes of what happens to PAF pilots who try any rebellion.
ManishH
BRFite
Posts: 974
Joined: 21 Sep 2010 16:53
Location: Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democractic republic

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by ManishH »

Shuja Pasha gets another 1 year extension. Signs of Kayani left with no reliable (loyal to him) replacements or amreeka renewing it's yearly humint contract ?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25359
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

vina
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6046
Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by vina »

My information is that when the Americans left Badaber Airbase after the U2 ugly incident, they left behind everything save the U2s and some sensitive equipment.
I don't know. I spoke with one guy (American) long long ago and he had lived there as a kid with his parents in the PissHour Airbase you are referring two.

After Zia came to power (he was a totally something the cat brought in until the Soviets invaded Afghanistan), the Pakistanis demosilshed every trace of the US presence there, including filling in the swimming pool and the only thing that survived was a church which they left intact.

What the Americans left behind, the Pakis destroyed (in fact when Zia first came to power , he unleashed howling mobs which set the US embassy on fire). History would have been very very different indeed if the soviets had kept away from Afghanistan. Why they still might be around , and Zia/Pakistan would have sucked up to them massively after kicking unkil in the shin , just like he was attempting to do.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

I am betting on a display of mijjile testing by jernails to keep the morale of abduls up in short term with big talk about Tipuc ICBM completed shortly.
stryker
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 18
Joined: 05 Jan 2011 06:04

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by stryker »

After Libya, Pakistan, That should be one of our slogans. Certainly, more reason for action against a country that supports, arms, shelters and trains terrorists. For peace in the sub-continent, teh Pakistan army has to be defanged.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

Taliban threatens those who let off Davis
Setting free the killer of two innocent Pakistanis proved that Pakistan has become a US colony and our rulers have no guts to stand up against their American masters," Ahsan said. He claimed that Davis' release even after "committing double murder" would provide the Americans another opportunity "to make fun of Pakistan". Davis was acquitted and pardoned by a court in Lahore last week after over two million dollars was paid as "blood money" under Islamic laws to the relatives of the two men shot and killed by the CIA contractor in January.
"We don't understand why our rulers took advantage of Sharia for pleasing the Americans when Pakistan is a secular country where all decisions are made under Anglo-Saxon law," Ahsan claimed. Ahsan said the Taliban were aware of the crucial role played by Pakistan's Ambassador to the US Hussain Haqqani in floating the idea of 'diyat' to enable Davis to be freed.
Some how 10 percenti has escaped the wrath this time which has been taken out on ghagra choli wearing jernails
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

Myth vs reality: US aid to Pakistan dwarfed by economic cost of war
The country’s economic losses as a result of the war against terror exceed the amount of aid received from the United States by five times, according to an analysis conducted by the economic affairs division in the finance ministry.
all bravardo over rahman dawood over now back to begging
Some officials in Islamabad are of the view that Washington’s aid to Pakistan is insufficient compensation for the price that the country has to pay for cooperation with the United States
Hiten
BRFite
Posts: 1130
Joined: 21 Sep 2008 07:57
Location: Baudland
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Hiten »

Off Topic

but how are members viewing Gaganji's pictures. I am seeing only this this ice cube entombed frog?

Image
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shiv »

Hiten wrote:Off Topic

but how are members viewing Gaganji's pictures. I am seeing only this this ice cube entombed frog?

Image
They were visible to me. Now I see only a frog in ice. I think people erally need to shift to an image viewing site that allows people to view images from outside sites. Photobucket currently works fine.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shiv »

Hmmm.

This article supposedly quoting the TTP is speaking the language of the Pakistan army. What gives? Sridhar? Any comments?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25359
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

shiv wrote:
Hiten wrote:Off Topic

but how are members viewing Gaganji's pictures. I am seeing only this this ice cube entombed frog?

They were visible to me. Now I see only a frog in ice. I think people erally need to shift to an image viewing site that allows people to view images from outside sites. Photobucket currently works fine.
I continue to see them and I refreshed the browser to ensure that it was not from the cache.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25359
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

vina wrote:
My information is that when the Americans left Badaber Airbase after the U2 ugly incident, they left behind everything save the U2s and some sensitive equipment.
I don't know. I spoke with one guy (American) long long ago and he had lived there as a kid with his parents in the PissHour Airbase you are referring two.
Vina, did some googling after I saw your post. Please see this.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25359
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

shiv wrote:
Hmmm.

This article supposedly quoting the TTP is speaking the language of the Pakistan army. What gives? Sridhar? Any comments?
Two sets of people must be soiling their undies now. If PPP plays the card well, both Kiyani & Shuja Pasha must become marked men as they were directly involved in facilitating the release. Zardari, Gilani, Rehman Malik must repeatedly emphasize (and immediately too before the PA turns the table on them) that the Americans dealt directly with the PA/ISI. Otherwise, they themselves will become the sacrificial lamb. Shahbaz Sharif is also ina spot of bother, he also having been involved. But, he cleverly played both sides by first arresting Davis and then saying the courts would decide etc. Maqdoom Shah Mehmood Qureshi saw the approaching doom and cleverly escaped. So, all in all, the purer specimen have quite a few for target practice. They may even decide to take out all of them for so casually playing with fire !
svenkat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4727
Joined: 19 May 2009 17:23

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by svenkat »


Pakistan and China have got away so easily.Shows how focussed US is on not letting Porkistan sink And how US and China are co-ordinating their policies on Pakistan.This open admission is very clear indication that Obamas comment during his visit to china imploring India and Pak to seek peace was a true reflection of American policy on Indian sub-continent.

What do the gurus feel about the open admission by Unkil? The Wikileaks reveal US contempt for Indian pretensions on Security Council membership.The Indo-US 'strategic co-operation' seems to be a sick joke.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7100
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shyamd »

ramana wrote:ShyamD, You need to elaborate on the pressures and demands on TSPA which make it weak and overstretched. Not many know this aspect.
Sure. Its simple. They are deployed in the northern borders, fighting Af-Pak under cover, internal security duties in Balochistan plus foot troops in Kashmir and then they have to watch Indian border etc. You have your boss/financier (KSA et al) who want you to help them out against Iran or any internal unrest. You have TSP top guns who are part of the navy/air force in the middle east. With all these internal troubles and now possible Iran war looming, many TSPA troops are not even sitting in TSP, they are in the arab peninsula. MI6 walla's landing in Pindi are not talking about India border, they are talking about NWFP and Arabian peninsula issues - which just goes to back up what I am saying.

Then on top of that, if lets say a war between India and Pak take place, whats Kayani going to say to his boss/financier in KSA? Sheikhji can I bring back my troops, India is preparing for war. KSA is gonna say, listen birather, if you take your troops back to TSP, you are breaking our agreement and we can no longer provide aid for you as you are jeopardizing sunni islam, the land of the 2 holy mosques as Iran can give us a lot of trouble etc etc.

So KSA spy chief is landing in Delhi not for chai-biskoot but saying to us, lay off TSP, we'll give you good deals. US is nodding in the background saying yes, we want you to have peaaceee onlee so that the US can give TSPA a kick in the backside to do some operations chasing taliban up and down NWFP/FATA.

TSPA chief is saying come lets have some CBM, lay off us and we wont do anything. Now as Gaganji has rightly pointed out, as soon as all this lovey dovey CBM stuff is over and US pull out, TSPA regains its influence in Gandhaara. He's going to have a lot of abduls on his hands with AK47s and not a lot to do. These abduls could further take over parts of Pak and go gung ho for Islamabad. Or Kayani/ISI could choose to re-direct energies to Kaafir India.

So, in a few years time, ISI is going to be issuing orders to conduct a super major strike in India that will kick off a war. 26/11 failed to start the war that they soo badly wanted. So this time ISI has to think of something bigger. This is when the Jihadi with nukes scenario is going to come into play.

To summarise: Iran is not going to go nuklear until 2015 at the earliest. So, at some point US/GCC/Israel has to defang Iran or teach it a lesson. I see a safe Kashmir, India (apart from a few small terror strikes here or there) for the next few years until TSP get released from their Af-Pak duties and GCC duties.

What does India need to do?

The options are quite limited, India should get the US to stay in Afghanistan, as Kashmiri terrorist don't want to fight yindu soldiers but they are after the big power - the US (the dajjal/the higher caste kaafir). US doesn't have the economic appetite to stay the course in Afghanistan.

Next option is arm the Tajik's/old school Northern Alliance guys and open a significant front. Or you hope for the Iranians to get stronger and make the KSA even more scared of Iran. So, KSA forces TSP to deploy more assets in the GCC coupled with a drawn out Northern Alliance v Taleb war.

This might be the ideal situation where KSA is forced to economically support India (which is what our west asia ties are about) in return for keeping the Indo Pak border safe (which is also what we want). It buys time for us to clear out the militancy. Pak is overstretched and is fighting in the northern front, as well as having significant numbers deployed on the peninsula. India grows economically, safe border, room for options, our resources can be deployed to the navy etc etc.

This is just the skeleton of what I think will happen. There is still lots to talk about such as the PRC/Russia role in all of this, Iraq etc etc.

Just my 2 pence.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shiv »

shyamd wrote: India should get the US to stay in Afghanistan,
Other than begging what can India do?

Now when India begs the US to stop supporting Pakistan - (such support is cheap for the US) the US says balls.

Now if India begs the US to stay in Afghanistan - a costly option for the US why on earth should the US agree?
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by abhijitm »

arun wrote:Apparently Dr. Shireen Mazari is not persona non grata at the Nation reportedly because the owner of the Nation, the rabidly Sunni Mohammaden bigot Majid Nizami, discovered that she had recently changed sect to the Shia form of Mohammadenism

A duplicitous state: An orphaned nation

Savour the Jalebi served up.
Even on the economic front, the state has relinquished all authority to the IMF chosen economy managers - over-paid and ignorant of national realities
This takes the cake. These B@$tard$ begged the IMF in 2008 for a loan. What they think IMF as a charity?? See the contributing nations and assigned Quota. Pakistan's quota is 1 B$ whereas the loan given is more than 7 B$. You pak lurkers where this money comes from?? We are paying you! and you think that should be unconditional? talk about sense of entitlement here. Boy, you have some balls to criticize IMF. In fact we should be criticizing it for wasting our money on you.
F*** u...
Raghavendra
BRFite
Posts: 1252
Joined: 11 Mar 2008 19:07
Location: Fishing in Sadhanakere

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Raghavendra »

Hiten wrote:Off Topic

but how are members viewing Gaganji's pictures. I am seeing only this this ice cube entombed frog?

Image
Imageshack recently changed its linking policy, google birather will give more info if needed


I use pix.am for hosting images
Gagan's post with the new image links added

Gagan wrote:Meanwhile:
The CIA Drone Program in Pakistan

Bandari airfield at Shamsi, Balochistan.

Even as Kiyani huffs and puffs and wags a finger at the US over the drone strikes being carried out in pakistan, a cursory look at this one airfield tells a different tale. The facilities on this base have been continuously expanding over a period of time. All this angst expressed by the Pakistani politicians and now Kiyani himself is all for the abduls on the streets of Pakistan.

June 20, 2003
Image

July 2, 2004
Image

March 30, 2007
Image

July 12, 2010
Image
Gagan wrote:The US presently occupies three bases in Pakistan.
Image

1. Bandari airfield at Shamsi - Predator and Reaper drone launch and recovery.
2. Pasni airfield - where the U2 spy plane was based. There is a picture of this on a BR Monitor cover.
3. Shahbaz PAFB, Jacobabad - where the US troops had built a 911 memorial in the shape of the twin towers, where the Pakistani army wasn't allowed to visit, and recently the pakistani armed forces decided to breach canals and flood villages to protect this airbase during last year's massive floods.

In addition, the FBI and other intel agencies keep a strict watch on every passanger departing on any international flight out of pakistan, the US keeps a close watch on Port Qasim and other points of exit of cargo. All this to prevent some abduls from spiriting out N material or other WMD related stuff out of pakistan. The level of control that the US has on Pakistan is mind boggling, Pakistan is today in reality the 51st state of the US.

Think about it, this is tighter level of control than what the British had on pre independence united India at any point in history.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7100
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shyamd »

Shivji, Indeed I meant to say that. Thats why I said "US doesn't have the economic appetite to stay the course in Afghanistan". They are not going to stay - hence why our options becoming limited and the next best option is to arm the tajik's. The tajiks are the backbone of the current Afghan army. So its for sure this is heading for civil war at some point. So India should support the Tajik's. PRC has seen the light and is striking deals with Karzai and PRC'izig the Afghan army.
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Gagan »

Given that Kiyani and Pasha are now the most hated serving military officers in the pakistani army these days, one can be sure that an assassination attempt will be made against them sooner or later. This might be in the form of some military men along with some ex-military jihadi types.

But these guys might escape such an attempt just like mushy escaped, and to be sure, they will make an example of any such conspirators they catch.

Shahbaz sharif is going to be in a spot of bother. But that wily guy has been busy these last few years building bridges with Punjabi Jihadis - good insurance move.
pran
BRFite
Posts: 110
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 11:31
Location: internet

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by pran »

Shiv> Other than begging what can India do?
A harmless act of preparing more shafts for future testing some at known site pokhran some elsewhere. If that is too much then park some shaft digging machinery in full public view of the satellites at Pokhran ,dig a small pit and move them around area and draw track lines in the sand.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7100
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shyamd »

And I've just been given more info on the Pak role and their security agreements. All I can say is that its a very smart plan by the arabs and TSPians.
Guddu
BRFite
Posts: 1059
Joined: 01 Dec 2008 06:22

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Guddu »

Marvi is trying to get back into the talibans good graces

Marvi Memon on Sunday urged the government to retaliate against the drone strikes.
http://dunyanews.tv/index.php?key=Q2F0S ... Q9MjI0NTA=

The Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid Member National Assembly (MNA) dispatched a letter to Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani in which she demanded that the government, through a parliamentary resolution, should allow the army to retaliate against the US drone attacks.

She wrote that the drone strikes were an attack on the sovereignty of Pakistan and the Parliament had already adopted a resolution against them. She asked the prime minister to inform the UN about the US aggression.

She said that the constitution bound the government to protect its citizens but the rulers had failed to do so. If the government had signed some secret pact on the drone strikes, it was also a violation of the constitution, Marvi said in her letter.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shravan »

15 more killed in Karachi target killings

KARACHI: Around 15 people, including three activists of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and two of Pakhtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party (PMAP), were killed in a wave of violence in Karachi on Sunday.
archan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6823
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by archan »

shravan wrote: Pakhtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party (PMAP)
:?: Milli Awami Party? is there a micro awami party, macro awami party, kilo.... etc?
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shiv »

pran wrote:
Shiv> Other than begging what can India do?
A harmless act of preparing more shafts for future testing some at known site pokhran some elsewhere. If that is too much then park some shaft digging machinery in full public view of the satellites at Pokhran ,dig a small pit and move them around area and draw track lines in the sand.
I don't disagree with your idea. But I cannot see how that will cause the US to stay in Afghanistan, which is what the begging idea was about.
pran
BRFite
Posts: 110
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 11:31
Location: internet

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by pran »

But I cannot see how that will cause the US to stay in Afghanistan, which is what the begging idea was about.
I don't think US will ever get out of Af-Pak at least not in 5-10 years timeframe.The US straitjacket around TSP is giving it some leeway to conduct strategic operations in the Islamic heartland. If US were to wrap up and leave , then it will be a easy fan out of TSP global operations as it did earlier Bosnia,Chechnya,Africa supplied by China.

The other reason for US to stay here is the same reason why ABV did not let the army to cross the border during Kargil. The only thing that changed is that the US remote control on TSP does not work, it cannot let TSP to open a strategic opportunity for India and upset the applecart.TSP's 3.5 friends is now down to 3 due to natural causes. Given the strategic quagmire Af-Pak is a sand pit, as long as 4 major powers have eyes on that area, it will always catch one or the other.


It suits Indian interest either way. I alluded to posturing India's nuclear intent w.r.t. US subsidizing TSP-Chinese violation and if my instincts are correct Jassoo Mithaiwala has already indicated another harmless way to raise the temperature, talk about nuclear doctrine and bring every sundry hawk to the table for chai biskoot sessions and televise it.
Theo_Fidel

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Theo_Fidel »

http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDe ... 7231&Cat=9

One of the Bengali rapists speaks. Note the bravado, this after abject surrender.

All the grammatical errors are included.
Raymond Davis and Aimal Kansi

Taj M Khattak
Monday, March 21, 2011

On a cold January morning nearly forty years ago, when I was a PoW, I found myself pushed into an Indian interrogation cell for some softening up. Forced to strip and subjected to incessant baton blows, I soon ended up in a corner and on the ground, shivering with cold. When my humiliation was complete, I experienced a feeling which can be best expressed by what Mao Zedong once said: Strongest is the man who has nothing more to lose.

I got straight up and shouted some full-throated invectives at my tormentor. Soon the burly man backed off, noticing that his baton wasn’t inflicting the same physical pain any longer. My shouting at least got me back my clothes, even though my dignity wasn’t restored; not in terms of my mistreatment, that is.
In essence this is the nature of the TSPA even as the country implodes around it. It is still trying to prevent 1971.
As for my grilling four decades ago, after I was back from the interrogation centre that evening I entered in my small diary a sentence which I had read in Leonid Brezhnev’s biography. Then a colonel in the Soviet Red Army and holed up in his bunker which was pounded relentlessly by German artillery, he vowed that if ever he got a chance to plan the defences of his fatherland, he would never let this happen again. Brezhnev went on to become president of the USSR and the Soviet Union’s defences were at their peak during his rule. Of course, I cannot follow through on what was said in those borrowed lines.

But others can. From now on, we Pakistanis should seriously start thinking in terms of exercising our options – through actions, not merely through protests.
saip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4373
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by saip »

deleted
Last edited by saip on 21 Mar 2011 09:34, edited 1 time in total.
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 886
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Narad »

archan wrote:
shravan wrote: Pakhtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party (PMAP)
:?: Milli Awami Party? is there a micro awami party, macro awami party, kilo.... etc?
Saar its a phacking Arabi word. Did you forget RAMA? (Research and analysis Milli Afghanistan)

Porkis are proud shit worms of pious Arabi turd onlee, dont you know it already? :P
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11240
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Gagan »

AFAIK, and if my urdu is any good.
Milli = Desh bhakt, Mehboob-e-watan, the guys who get all the nation together.

So Milli Awam Party == Unifying+Nationalistic people's party.
Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 979
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Rupesh »

Prince and parliamentarian

As reported in the press, a delegation of khakis from Al-King’s realm came to visit our boys at their headquarters recently. There’s a neat little story that might serve as an illuminating backgrounder to the visit. A few years ago, in the time of Mush, a young parliamentarian from Pakistan had the opportunity to converse with a prince of Al-King’s realm, a scion of the great House, who had something to do with foreign affairs. Our parliamentarian and the prince struck up a friendship, and during the course of the conference they were both attending in a lovely European capital, had occasion to break bread and more importantly, imbibe some uplifting spirits. During the latter period, with both in merry mood, the parliamentarian asked the prince about their khaki formations and how many men under arms they had. The prince replied candidly that the Kingdom had learnt from Al-Bakistan’s experience – why build up a mighty fauj only to have it do coups d’etat against the royal House? And especially, went on Al-Prince, when there was always Al-Bakistan’s brotherly khaki machine to rely upon in an emergency. When the parliamentarian looked askance at Al-Prince, he pointed to the late unlamented Tyrant Terry Thomas’ highly efficient role in quelling a Palestinian rebellion against King Hussein of Jordan in the 1970s. Will our khakis be called upon once again to quell popular revolts in the Lands of Sand? This is an important question during these trying times for Middle Eastern tyrants with people’s power threatening once unshakeable thrones.
^This confirms what ShyamD was stating in the previous page...
Sorry state

Reliable sources report that zealots from Isloo’s out-of-commission Red Mosque have gone forth and taken over 50 other mosques in and around our capital city.(AoA ) :mrgreen: This alarming news has been placed before the Min of Int and he has alerted Hubby about it but the latter has declared that there is nothing he can do, and “let those who know these people deal with them”. What a sorry state we’re in, with the government abdicating more and more of its powers.
Such Gup from TFT Remove one "W" from url
Harish
BRFite
Posts: 148
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 10:30
Location: Bharat

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Harish »

RD killed ISI goons. The ISI and the Army decided to let him off. Why would the Taliban and other assorted jihadis bother about this so much?

The Taliban and other jihadis, with the possible exception of state-run outfits like LeT routinely slaughter ISI goons, baki army abduls, civilian abduls, yankees, Indians and anyone else they can lay their hands on. Why would they even bother about this RD affair, much less exact revenge for it? The Taliban works against the ISI and couldn't care less about it, right?
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7826
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by rohitvats »

One interesting anecdote on Zia.....the fellow was commisioned into 13 Lancers and joined the regiment in Indonesia (after the japs surrendered)..the BIA it seems was engaged in CI Ops against local population....our man one day lands up in Officer's Mess in Salwar kameez and lectures on how 13 Lancers should not fight the Indonesians as they were too muslims.....no surprisingly, he was booted out of the regiment and sent back to India. Guess, the isalmist bug had a long long gestation period.
Locked