Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2012

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Roperia
BRFite
Posts: 778
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Roperia »

Yawn reports three more Allah ko pyare kar diye gaye in Karachi

Karachi bleeds as three more people killed
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

r_subramanian wrote:Interesting development, if true
IP gas pipeline: Russia agrees to financial and technical assistance
Russia has agreed in-principle to extend financial and technical aid to Pakistan for the $1.5 billion Iran-Pakistan (IP) gas pipeline project... A sub-committee of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) – which met on Friday to review the progress of IP gas pipeline project – was informed that Russia had agreed to extend financial and technical support for the project. Talks between the two countries were recently held in Moscow, and Russia will respond formally to Pakistan within a fortnight.
...
link_to_tribune_online
This after the all-weather friend pulled out because of uncertainties and security-related issues ? Let's wait for two more weeks for the formal response from Russia. The Pakistanis have the habit of lying and jumping the gun every time.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

Charlie wrote:Another salvo from the new IT kingpins.
. . . but also scripts an interesting new chapter in the history of tech rivalry between Pakistan and India, observed the release.
why this Kolaveri suddenly from Pakistan ? I thought that six or seven years back, we discussed here threadbare about the Pakistani claim of earning as much (if not more) foreign exchange as India through IT exports. I thought we unanimously accepted here that by applying some Lahori logic, it was indeed so. So, what are they still trying to prove to us Disbelievers-turned-Believers ?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

CRamS wrote:Which report do we believe, the above, where Hafeez pig is reported as being a "bad terrorist", or this one where the ISI strategy is in full flow casting Hafeez pig as a "good terrorist"
I don't see a problem here, CRamS. Why, context makes all the difference.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by shiv »

If 130 pakis get houris under snow why is it big news in India? Every channel reporting it as if Yuvraj was there.
menon s
BRFite
Posts: 721
Joined: 01 May 2010 09:51
Location: Bangalore

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by menon s »

Pakistani policeman accuses colleagues in blast
http://news.yahoo.com/pakistani-policem ... 21650.html
A senior Pakistani police officer has accused three colleagues of organizing a suicide attack against him in the country's largest city of Karachi.
Rao Anwar Ahmed Khan said Friday he had unspecified "evidence" showing that the three officers were involved in the blast Thursday that killed four people.
He said he had filed a criminal case against them.
The men he accused were not immediately reachable for comment.
Khan's allegations suggest the police force in Karachi may have been infiltrated with Islamist militant sympathizers.
The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for Thursday's attack against Khan, who has pledged to battle extremism in the city.
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14399
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Aditya_V »

shiv wrote:If 130 pakis get houris under snow why is it big news in India? Every channel reporting it as if Yuvraj was there.
Damn only 130, this is allah message that Pakistan must sign for AGPL or get out of POK giving it to Kaffir Hindus.

PS. we should take out some of those SAR helos with SA-7's, there will not be any radar coverage these can be claimed as losses due to inclement weather and SAR missions will be abandoned.

And as usual media which claims to be Indian spouts crap, to these Mandarins the blood spilt to get the Former Quaid-E Azam post and now Bana Singh post is off little significance.

Avalanche buries 100 Pakistani soldiers near Siachen Glacier
Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 78-kilometer (49-mile)-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.
As Indians can't edit the para that started deploying there like Kargil.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

Firstly, the Pakistanis are *not* on the Siachen glacier.
Deans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2594
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 19:13
Location: Moscow

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Deans »

Wonder which halfwit placed a Battalion HQ in the likely path of an avalanche. One would assume after 25 years of being in Saichen, TSP army would have figured these things out by now.
- Not that I'm complaining :D !
Last edited by Deans on 07 Apr 2012 23:03, edited 1 time in total.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

Acharya wrote:Can you put few para on the origins of LeT from 1980s.
Acharya, I can add some more info to what I posted about the origins, but not much more. If you want, I can give you a lot more other details about LeT to make it easier for you. Send me a mail at r a p t o r s s and I use Google M a i l. about the
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by abhijitm »

WTF!! What pakis were doing on Siachen Glacier???
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by abhijitm »

SSridhar wrote:Firstly, the Pakistanis are *not* on the Siachen glacier.
paki sites reporting "in", "at" whilst ToI saying "near". What the hell is going on? Did paki cross the line?

I cant enjoy this dead paki news until their location is clear :((
vdutta
BRFite
Posts: 682
Joined: 08 Nov 2002 12:31
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by vdutta »

RSoami wrote:
Narad wrote:Avalanche should offer unconditional apology to pa'astan for this unprovoked incidence. :mrgreen:
All supply of snow to avalanches will be cut off...
Avalanche should pay Diyat (Blood money) to pak fauj.
I hope supreme court takes suar motu notice :((
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by CRamS »

SSridhar wrote:
CRamS wrote:Which report do we believe, the above, where Hafeez pig is reported as being a "bad terrorist", or this one where the ISI strategy is in full flow casting Hafeez pig as a "good terrorist"
I don't see a problem here, CRamS. Why, context makes all the difference.
What I mean is that I would have thought ISI would have carefully calibrated Hafeez ig's rhetoric and activities. What can TSP possibly gain by having this guy bad mouth US. The last thing TSP want is India and US be on the side side when it comes to terrorism. The fraud since 9/11, where the mighty Al Queda and ts affiliates constitute bad terror, Pakis are a "victim" of terrorism takes a hit does it not
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

CRamS, in the multi-headed Paki hydra, Professor saheb is another head, a powerful one though. Rehman Malik would say that Pakistan is a free country and people enjoy maximum freedom of speech. The Courts have exonerated Professori and India never gave clinching evidence that could stand the scrutiny of a fierce and impartial judiciary like it is in Pakistan.

Be that as it may, Professor saheb has been bad mouthing the Hanuds, Yahudis and the Nasaras for a long time now. Nothing new. In fact, he has been even organizing terrorism against the Hanuds and the Nasaras, forget just fiery speeches. He openly collects money for the jihad against the kafir Hindus and Christians all over Pakistan and everybody knows that. It is said that his income is a few crores every day.

Let us remember that the French Prosecutor and counter-terrorism expert, Jean-Louis Bruguière, who investigated the case of Willy Brigitte, has concluded that the LeT terrorist training camps were run by the Pakistani military with the possible knowledge of the CIA.

Bruguiere said, “When the camp was resupplied, all the materiel was dropped off by Pakistani army helicopters. And there were regular inspections by the Pakistani Army and the CIA. The US agency carried out spot checks to ensure that Pakistan was sticking to an agreement not to train any foreigners at the militant organisation”

I am sure that the CIA definition of 'foreigners' was anybody against Western interests.

I am now beginning to wonder if David Coleman Headley was there in the camp along with Brigitte, facilitated by the CIA and is that the reason that a firewall has been thrown around him ? Did DCH help nab Brigitte in Australia even as the CIA allowed DCH to go ahead with his diabolical Indian plot ?
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by shiv »

abhijitm wrote:
SSridhar wrote:Firstly, the Pakistanis are *not* on the Siachen glacier.
paki sites reporting "in", "at" whilst ToI saying "near". What the hell is going on? Did paki cross the line?

I cant enjoy this dead paki news until their location is clear :((

Bloody slave mentality of Times of India. They have just licked up the diarrhea of western agencies and spat it at us. It is amazing how many educated Indians are like this. You give them an education and we lick up anything published by western media sources.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 569720.cms
Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 78-kilometer (49-mile)-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Uyghur Terrorists, Pakistan & China

Post by SSridhar »

The sweeter-than-the-sweetest-honey friend China asks Pakistan to handover Uyghur separatists
Chinese authorities have asked Pakistan to hand over members of the extremist East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) believed to be operating out of the country, naming six terror suspects in a list issued on Friday that described the group as the “most direct and real safety threat that China faces”.

The six men were “core members” of the ETIM, said the Ministry of Public Security in a statement. They were identified as Nurmemet Memetmin, Abdulkyum Kurban, Paruh Tursun, Tursunjan Ebibla, Nurmemet Raxit and Mamat Imin Nurmamat — all Uighurs, the ethnic Turkic Muslim minority from China's far-western Xinjiang region which borders Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

Training terrorists

While the Ministry's statement stopped short of stating directly their links to terror camps in Pakistan — it only mentioned “a South Asian country” — a separate statement from the Chinese government issued last year identified Mr. Memetmin as having trained terrorists in Pakistan to carry out attacks in the city of Kashgar that left at least 20 people dead.

Mr. Nurmamat was also believed to be in Pakistan, according to Chinese analysts. The Ministry of Public Security said he had fled China after an explosion triggered accidentally at a bomb-making terror unit in Shache, Xinjiang that was plotting an attack in October 2009.

The statement named Mr. Memetmin as one of the founders of the ETIM when it was set up in 1997. It said he had dispatched another ETIM member, Memtieli Tiliwaldi, to China in 2007. Mr. Tiliwaldi was named by the Xinjiang regional government last year as being behind bombings and knife-attacks in Kashgar in July that left at least 20 people killed.

That the statement named several alleged ETIM members known to be in Pakistan underscored rising Chinese concerns over Pakistani authorities failing to effectively clamp down on the spread of terror across the border into Xinjiang. These concerns have been reflected in several public statements issued following the Kashgar violence that have unusually pointed the finger at an “all-weather ally”.

Pakistani officials have said they have taken steps to crack down on the ETIM. Major General Athar Abbas, Inter Services Public Relations Director-General, said following last year's attack in Kashgar that the Pakistani Army would continue operations against the organisations. He also pointed out the successes of its operations, such as the killing of ETIM leaders Hasan Mahsum in 2003 and Miamaitming Maimaili, also known as Abdul Haq al Turkistani, in February 2011.

Major links

Last month, following violence in Yecheng, near Kashgar, that left at least 20 people killed, Xinjiang Governor Nur Bekri said those behind recent incidents had “a thousand and one links” to terrorists in neighbouring Pakistan. He did, however, add that “violent activities by individual terrorists” would not affect bilateral ties.

Critics of Mr. Bekri and some Uighur scholars such as economist Ilham Tohti have, however, accused the government of exaggerating the terror threat by describing all incidents of ethnic unrest in Xinjiang as “separatist activities” to justify harsh crackdowns.
SureshP
BRFite
Posts: 256
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SureshP »

More details


Pakistani troops dig for 117 missing in avalanche
Updated 3m ago

ISLAMABAD (AP) – Pakistani soldiers dug into a massive avalanche in a mountain battleground close to the Indian border on Saturday, searching for at least 117 of their colleagues buried when the wall of snow engulfed a military complex.

More than 12 hours after the disaster at the entrance to the Siachen Glacier, no survivors had been found.

"We are waiting for news and keeping our fingers crossed," said army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas.

Hundreds of troops, sniffer dogs and mechanical equipment were at the scene, but were struggling to make much headway into the avalanche, which crashed down onto the rear headquarters building in the Gayari sector early in the morning, burying it under some 75 yards of snow, said Abbas.

"It's on a massive scale," he said. "Everything is completely covered."


Siachen is on the northern tip of the divided Kashmir region claimed by both India and Pakistan.

The accident highlighted the risks of deploying troops to one of the most inhospitable places on earth.

The thousands of troops from both nations stationed there brave viciously cold temperatures, altitude sickness, high winds and isolation for months at a time. Troops have been deployed at elevations of up to 22,000 feet and have skirmished intermittently since 1984, though the area has been quiet since a cease-fire in 2003. The glacier is known as the world's highest battlefield.

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani expressed his shock at the incident, which he said "would in no way would undermine the high morale of soldiers and officers."

The headquarters in Gayari, situated at around 15,000 feet is the main gateway through which troops and supplies pass on their to other more remote outposts in the sector. It is situated in a valley between two high mountains, close to a military hospital, according to an officer who was stationed there in 2003.

"I can't comprehend how an avalanche can reach that place," said the officer, who didn't give his name because he is not authorized to speak to the media. "It was supposed to be safe."


More soldiers have died from the weather than combat on the glacier, which was uninhabited before troops moved there.

Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 49-mile-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/stor ... 54096536/1
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Uyghur Terrorists, Pakistan & China

Post by shiv »

SSridhar wrote:The sweeter-than-the-sweetest-honey friend China asks Pakistan to handover Uyghur separatists
Chinese authorities have asked Pakistan to hand over members of the extremist East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) believed to be operating out of the country, naming six terror suspects in a list issued on Friday that described the group as the “most direct and real safety threat that China faces”.
Evidence. Pakistan will need evidence. If one of these men has shot a Chinese guy dead, the dead Chinaman will have to bring two witnesses as proof that the guy was involved. Justice is not something that you can do through lists.

It is another matter that the cowardly Pakistan army that has lost more men fighting the Christist Imperial USA's war against Muslims will quietly kill these pious Uighurs for the Pork eaters and deny everything.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by shiv »

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/stor ... 54096536/1
Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 49-mile-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 569720.cms
Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 78-kilometer (49-mile)-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6919
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by habal »

SureshP wrote:More details


Pakistani troops dig for 117 missing in avalanche
Updated 3m ago

ISLAMABAD (AP) – Pakistani soldiers dug into a massive avalanche in a mountain battleground close to the Indian border on Saturday, searching for at least 117 of their colleagues buried when the wall of snow engulfed a military complex.

.....

Conflict there began in 1984 when India occupied the heights of the 49-mile-long glacier, fearing Pakistan wanted to claim the territory. Pakistan also deployed its troops. Both armies remain entrenched despite the cease-fire, costing the poverty-stricken countries many millions of dollars each year.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/stor ... 54096536/1
:lol: ...

they forgot *nuclear flashpoint*, rest is upto standards.
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10196
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by sum »

^^ Expect the chorus for de-militarization( to save innocent lives) to grow with multiple shows to discuss this urgent issue on Indian channels within next 2-3 days.
Rajdeep
BRFite
Posts: 491
Joined: 23 Aug 2010 20:48

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Rajdeep »

Zardari: I was told to leave Pakistan with plane ready, but refused
Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday said that he was asked to leave the country but he had refused to do so.

"I was told to leave the country and that a plane was ready but I refused as I am not a weak-hearted man like others," Zardari said while talking to a group of journalists and lawyers at the governor's house.

He did not say who had asked him to leave the country or when the demand was made.
Responding to a question, he said: "Bearing pain is the secret of my success" :rotfl: .

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 573141.cms
Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4080
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Lilo »

sum wrote:^^ Expect the chorus for de-militarization( to save innocent lives) to grow with multiple shows to discuss this urgent issue on Indian channels within next 2-3 days.
How authentic is the claim that >100 wannabe Gazis are buried under the avalanche?
Any independent sources apart from ISPR and other Paki Army sources?

The incident's timing is quite opportune coming on the eve of 10%-MMS meetup and can give a "solid outcome" after an hour or two of "frank" talks away from the influence of our Babu's.
Altair
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2620
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 12:51
Location: Hovering over Pak Airspace in AWACS

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Altair »

Lilo wrote:
sum wrote:^^ Expect the chorus for de-militarization( to save innocent lives) to grow with multiple shows to discuss this urgent issue on Indian channels within next 2-3 days.
How authentic is the claim that >100 wannabe Gazis are buried under the avalanche?
Any independent sources apart from ISPR and other Paki Army sources?

The incident's timing is quite opportune coming on the eve of 10%-MMS meetup and can give a "solid outcome" after an hour or two of "frank" talks away from the influence of our Babu's.
I do not trust Pakis but I think India has birds orbiting earth to snap the Paki post near the Glacier. It would be highly unlikely to lie and get away. India can also verify with Israelis and perhaps Russia that they did not sneak those pigs into India by creating an avalanche as a diversion.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Prem »

117 Poaqs get their ticket to Djannat by the SnowDjinn.Sad that many of their buddies are left behind in Djinnah's Dojakhdesh. I say give them free tickets too so they can watch Soors vs Hoors rumble in the Mustang ranch up there in the sky. This leads to a new question for Poaqs. How do the realtives and friends provide comfort and solace to the wives, children of of dead men. By telling them that their Hubbies are digging deep into hoors' pindilion ka gooda or the father enjoying 69 to 72.
SureshP
BRFite
Posts: 256
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SureshP »

This was a base behind the LAC. It was the central base from whence supplies to forward positions were forwarded. The avalanche covered about 1 Sq Km burying the base to a depth of ~ 75 meters. NO survivors have been recovered. Indeed, they have not managed to retrieve a single dead body so far.

Chances of survival are non-existent for anyone within that 1 Sq Km as its far too late to get anyone out. Within the first hour possibly, but now no chance of getting anyone out alive.

It will take them many days and weeks to get the bodies out. They may eventually decide to leave most of them buried where they are and claim a lower death toll, or own up to the full extent of casualties, depends on what the ISPR thinks offers them maximum sympathy and minimum embarrassment.
Roperia
BRFite
Posts: 778
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Roperia »

TSPA publishes list of names of 135 wannabe ghazis trapped under avalanche in Gayari sector near Skardu

One Lt Col, one Maj and one Capt were killed in this unprovoked attack on Pa'astan's sovereignty. This will only strengthen the hands of militants if US doesn't offer financial & logistical support and if India doesn't withdraw its forces from Siachen which is also causing global warming resulting in floods in Pa'astan.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety. The only way to bring peace to South Asia is by pressurizing India to solve the Kashmir dispute.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by jrjrao »

Humayun "I am" Gobar says that Pakis already have a secret nuclear with China that is 10 times the so-called nuclear deal that India got:
The ‘civilian nuclear deal’ as America has with India is a joke. We don’t need it since we already have such a relationship with China. In fact, we are ahead of India with our relationship with China than India is with its controversial deal with America. I shouldn’t say more on such a sensitive subject. We put the civilian nuclear deal on the negotiating table only for political purposes to put pressure on America. That is all. We don’t really need it.
and then, he says the Pakis should demand the following ransom, before they will agree to "reset" the concrete ties with Amrikaa:
Our external debt is around $65-70 billion. We have wasted at least $85 billion fighting America’s ‘war on terror’. We should ask America to pay off our entire external debt.

That’s no write-off or favour. It’s a due. As to the balance of around $15-20 billion, America should pay it off by investing it in equal installments in our infrastructure over five years. That will solve our energy problems, get our planes and trains running, enhance our road and train networks, give our people clean drinking water, build hospitals, schools and colleges, dams and canals and so forth. All of this will provide jobs and kick-start our economy.

$20 billion is nothing for America.
Why, it spends as much in a few days in the wars that it is stupidly fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. It spends more in a year on Israel because it is in a reverse master-slave relationship with it. Corporate type ephemeral investments, IT and the like, America can do in India. Such things we can do ourselves. We can make burgers, pizzas and fry chicken. We get their useless franchises because we are in a master-slave relationship. Given our once great civilisation, it is we who should be franchising chicken tikka, bun kebab and biryani to them.
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/04 ... nd-slaves/
member_22872
BRFite
Posts: 1873
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by member_22872 »

jrjrao wrote:
Given our once great civilisation, it is we who should be franchising chicken tikka, bun kebab and biryani to them.
I have a feeling that the Poaqs want to hijack Indian history and claim it as theirs. In the face of identity crisis, this is a very easy way out. They have done this with Kashmir, they have done this with samjhauta episode, every things they said is a lie, so by extrapolation, this is going to happen, they will one day would say Indus civilization is their civilization, they already have started saying this.
Roperia
BRFite
Posts: 778
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Roperia »

High level meeting precedes Zardari's 'private' visit to India
Ahead of President Asif Ali Zardari’s private visit to India on Sunday, he held a detailed meeting with the Prime Minister, army chief, foreign and interior ministers at the Governor House in Lahore on Saturday
Zardari will be carrying a high level brief for MMS.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Prem »

jrjrao wrote:
Given our once great civilisation, it is we who should be franchising chicken tikka, bun kebab and biryani to them.
Is he fantasising Uncle' famous Hotdog and Poaq's famous Bun party ?
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7844
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Anujan »

Taqqiya from the Pakis in full swing.

They know that their economy is in shambles and Unkil is not going to be as generous with purse strings once Unkil draws down. Unkil probably also knows about Paki perfidy vis-a-vis OBL and would want some pound of flesh for that. India has more than enough money and diplomatic muscle to muscle Pakis out of Afghanistan. One more decade of current economic scenario and Pakistan, for all practical purposes will be irrelevant as far as India is concerned (wonder why it took us 75 years).

Pakis want taqqiya till they build up muscle in Afghanistan and re-estabilish their India focussed terror groups. It is very clear that terrorism is the only reason why Pakistan is still relevant in the Indian scheme of things and is unlikely Pakistan will give it up.

The problem with India is that we are quick to appease instead of a negotiated settlement where Pakis demonstrate their sincerity first. (This is not going to happen with the current dispensation) but any Pappi-Jhappi towards Pakis should be preceded by bringing major Anti-Indian criminals to book. This includes Dawood, Professor Saheb, the various yahoos, members of KCF etc. This also includes stopping Fake note printing.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by SSridhar »

So, it is not a very 'private' visit after all.
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Satya_anveshi »

Roperia wrote:TSPA publishes list of names of 135 wannabe ghazis trapped under avalanche in Gayari sector near Skardu

One Lt Col, one Maj and one Capt were killed in this unprovoked attack on Pa'astan's sovereignty. This will only strengthen the hands of militants if US doesn't offer financial & logistical support and if India doesn't withdraw its forces from Siachen which is also causing global warming resulting in floods in Pa'astan.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the partition of the subcontinent on independence from Britain in 1947. Two of the wars have been over Kashmir, which both claim in its entirety. The only way to bring peace to South Asia is by pressurizing India to solve the Kashmir dispute.
Aman ki ayesha warrants that India make a statement offering help to rescue now dead pakistani forces (apparently they were sniffer dogs also). This offer should be made by all political leaders in J&K, WKKs and should be run across all Paki TV media.
Every news clip of avalanch buring scores of puki forces should be accompanied by a statement:
India has offered help to pakistan, rival nation to its northwest, in rescue effort but pakistan is yet to respond to any offers of help from any nation. It vehemently rejects any aid given by any country for any reason.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32704
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by chetak »

Roperia wrote:High level meeting precedes Zardari's 'private' visit to India
Ahead of President Asif Ali Zardari’s private visit to India on Sunday, he held a detailed meeting with the Prime Minister, army chief, foreign and interior ministers at the Governor House in Lahore on Saturday
Zardari will be carrying a high level brief for MMS.
ever the postman, never the postmaster?
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Prem »

Anujan wrote:Taqqiya from the Pakis in full swing.They know that their economy is in shambles and Unkil is not going to be as generous with purse strings once Unkil draws down. Unkil probably also knows about Paki perfidy vis-a-vis OBL and would want some pound of flesh for that. India has more than enough money and diplomatic muscle to muscle Pakis out of Afghanistan. One more decade of current economic scenario and Pakistan, for all practical purposes will be irrelevant as far as India is concerned (wonder why it took us 75 years). . This also includes stopping Fake note printing.
At this point they produce "ecomical" value equal to the 4.5 weeks of Indian output. In ten years they will be reduced little over one week. Poaq Takkiya, lies and brags are good for India as it keep them fully enclosed in ideological Mush with little opening to peek out from time time like a Squirrel jumping on the nut. We must keep their hopes alive till the time come to serve the Poaqroast medium rare. This is the only way they die daily death and dont get away with suicide.
Rana
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 68
Joined: 17 Jun 2010 23:38

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Rana »

Why I support Baluchistan
By Dana Rohrabacher, Published: April 6
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html
Well, to paraphrase Shakespeare, methinks Islamabad doth protest too much. In fact, Pakistani elites are upset not about lies but the truth.
Wow! Finally fingering Pakistan for 9/11
We should not remain a silent partner to a Pakistani government that engages in monstrous crimes against its people and has been an accomplice to terrorist attacks on Americans, including those of Sept. 11, 2001. The real irritant to U.S.-Pakistan relations is not my resolution but the policies of the Islamabad government and military.
Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4080
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2

Post by Lilo »

Image
jrjrao wrote:Humayun "I am" Gobar says that Pakis already have a secret nuclear with China that is 10 times the so-called nuclear deal that India got:
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/04 ... nd-slaves/
:rotfl:

This gobar guy seriously has a repressed thingy for S & M

Ctrl-F showed there were 22 mentions of "Slave"
and 10 mentions of "Master"
and 5 mentions of "equitable" in the article.

Then there were 15 instances of "Relationship" and 8 instances of "gang"

that makes him
59% into being a "S"
27% into being a "M"
13% being neither.

He is positively prediposed towards a "relationship" and wants it to be with a "gang" :lol:
Post Reply