Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Locked
pradeepe
BRFite
Posts: 741
Joined: 27 Aug 2006 20:46
Location: Our culture is different and we cannot live together - who said that?

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by pradeepe »

Nayak wrote:Why would the pukes raise the bar so high suddenly ?

They know that RAW will get back to them, what makes it so worthwhile to blatantly assasinate senior cadre of the embassy ?
One possible reason is desperation. Keeping in mind that they have been squealing quite openly about increasing Indian presence there for a while. They wanted Kandhahar and Jalalabad missions to be closed IIRC.

So why the desperation?
1. Increasing Indian presence and the steady effectiveness with which GoI was winning hearts
2. Karzai not pulling any punches when it comes to pinning the blame for the mess there
3. Increasing NATO pressure on its borders - recent pset-e-shaheedization of its soldiers by NATO

All in all steady loss of control of what it calls its strategic depth.

So, inspite of having to brace themselves for the repurcussions, they tried to do something than having to see it slowly slip away. I hope the whirlwind to be reaped is forming slowly and steadily.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by vsudhir »

IIRC, some months back, Karzai openly invited GOI to send Indian troops to Afghanistan. As open an offer as any to give (permanent?) bases to the IA in Afg'n.

GoI's response in public was complete silence. Many here assumed its imprudent to jump into NATO's war et or that GoI would be too cautious to do something that big or that MMS wouldn't like to upset the pi$$ process etc.

Seems to me, GOI may well have accepted the invitation and sent in forces quietly to protect our assets and threaten those of TSP. Hence this attack.
Sree
BRFite
Posts: 103
Joined: 27 Nov 2001 12:31
Location: Southern Africa

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Sree »

Sudhir Boss:

I'm pretty sure (though this is based entirely on memory) that one of the specific conditions of Gen Musharraf's acquiescence in Powell and Armitage's "For us or against us" ultimatum right after 9-11 was that Indian forces should not be involved in any multinational operations in Afghanistan.

I don't know if any of the parties involved still consider themselves bound by those agreements.

Hope things are going well for you. Regards

Sree
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by vsudhir »

Hey Sree sahib

Am well, thanks. I trust you haven't changed one bit since we last met. :)

And yes, am aware of Mush's conditions. Karzai couldn't have made his open offer sans US approval, IMO. Besides, that could have been another US pressure tactic against TSP.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Philip »

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/ju ... stan.india

Richard Norton-Taylor The Guardian, Tuesday July 8, 2008
Article history

Bomber rams car packed with explosives into two diplomatic vehicles entering Indian embassy in central Kabul
A suicide bomber yesterday drove a car full of explosives into the gates of the Indian embassy in Kabul, killing at least 41 people in what Afghan officials described as the deadliest attack since the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001.

The Afghan interior ministry immediately accused a "regional intelligence service" of coordinating the attack - an unmistakable reference to Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence, ISI, whose agents have been blamed before for being behind terrorist incidents in Afghanistan.

Yesterday's attack came at a time when the new Pakistan government has been making conciliatory noises towards India and negotiating agreements with some tribal leaders in areas where al-Qaida and other militant groups are based.

The dead included India's defence attache, a senior diplomat, and two security guards at the embassy. The bomb exploded as people were queuing for visas at the embassy and people shopped at a nearby market. About 140 people were injured by the blast.

The explosion destroyed two embassy vehicles, blew the embassy gates off, all but demolished the embassy walls, and badly damaged buildings inside the compound, Reuters news agency reported. Windows were shattered hundreds of metres away.

The bomber rammed a car into two Indian diplomatic vehicles as they entered the gates of the embassy, according to witnesses.

They said the blast scattered human body parts over a wide area.

"The Interior ministry believes this attack was carried out in coordination and consultation with an active intelligence service in the region," it said in a statement.

"With this cowardly attack the enemies of peace in Afghanistan wanted to hurt ongoing friendly relations of Afghanistan with the rest of the world, especially India," Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, said. "Such attacks will not hamper Afghanistan's relations with other nations."

Manmohan Singh, the Indian prime minister, said: "The loss of these precious Indian and Afghan lives in the service of their country must be condemned in the strongest terms possible.

"Those responsible, directly or indirectly, for this terrorist attack and for making this possible are no better than the worst criminals."

One Taliban spokesman denied responsibility for the attack, although he appeared to be contradicted by others. Pakistan denied Afghanistan's implied accusations that its agents helped to plan it, and said it condemned the attack.

Analysts said the attack reflected Pakistan's concern about India's close relations with Afghanistan. India is one of Afghanistan's leading donors.

"This latest attack is very likely to fuel tension not least because Pakistan blames Afghanistan for allowing India to expand its influence [there]", Dr Farzana Shaikh, an associate fellow of the thinktank Chatham House, told the Guardian. The attack would cast a pall over talks later this week between Pakistan and India, she said.

"The new Pakistani government is very keen to be seen to be reducing tension," she added. If there was evidence that militant groups based in Pakistan were behind yesterday's attack in Kabul it would set back that process, she said.

British military commanders argue that suicide and roadside bomb attacks are evidence that Taliban leaders in their conflict with foreign troops are on the back foot. They say that these kinds of attacks are against the code of the Pashtun tribes of southern Afghanistan, the Pashtunwali, and that Taliban commanders will lose credibility with the local population.

That may be wishful thinking. Taliban leaders have threatened to step up suicide bomb attacks against the Karzai government and in protest against the presence of about 60,000 foreign troops, including 34,000 Americans, in Afghanistan.

It is also clear, military and intelligence officials and independent analysts say, that hundreds of foreign fighters, including many Uzbeks and Chechens, are based in Pakistan's northern tribal areas importing al-Qaida tactics into Afghanistan. On April 27 Karzai was shot at shortly before an annual military parade.

Yesterday's bombing followed an attack on police officers in Islamabad, the Pakistan capital, on Sunday and an attack on the Danish embassy there last month.

Three more police officers have died from a suicide attack near Islamabad's Red Mosque, bringing the death toll to 18, a Pakistani official said yesterday, as investigations continued into who was behind the assault.
sunilUpa
BRFite
Posts: 1795
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 04:16

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by sunilUpa »

Afghan officials accuse Pakistan of Indian embassy attack
KABUL (AFP) — Afghan officials accused Pakistan Tuesday of being behind a suicide blast at the Indian embassy that left 41 people dead, saying the attack had the hallmarks of its intelligence agency.
Monday's car bomb ripped into the embassy compound in the capital, killing two Indian diplomats and two Indian guards as well as nearly three dozen Afghans. Nearly 150 people were wounded, Afghan officials said.

"We believe firmly that there is a particular intelligence agency behind it," presidential spokesman Homayun Hamidzada told reporters. He would not name the outfit but said it was "very obvious" whom he meant.

A senior government official who did not want to be identified told AFP separately: "Pakistan was behind the attack on the Indian embassy."

Hamidzada said the attack was "designed outside Afghanistan and it was exported to Afghanistan" with the help of local collaborators.

"The sophistication of this attack and the kind of materials used and the specific targeting, everything has the hallmark of a particular intelligence agency that has conducted similar terrorist acts in Afghanistan in the past," he said.

Afghanistan regularly accuses circles in Pakistan, a long-time rival of India, of supporting the Taliban and other militants waging a deadly insurgency in the war-ravaged nation. Pakistan rejects the accusation.

Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Tuesday denied his government was involved in the attack, saying in Kuala Lumpur that it was not in Islamabad's interests to destabilise Afghanistan.

A security report to the Afghan cabinet on Monday also accused an unidentified foreign intelligence agency of involvement in the suicide blast, hinting it referred to Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence agency.

"The terrorists no doubt could not have succeeded in launching such an atrocity without full support of foreign intelligence," it said, according to a summary of the cabinet meeting released to journalists.

The report also said a "big number of puppet and foreign terrorists, the enemies of peace and stability of the Afghan people, have entered the country in the past several months," according to the summary.

And in a clear reference to Pakistan, it said "evidence shows that the terrorists have been trained, equipped and financed in professional bases across the border."

The cabinet had "decided to raise the issue with Afghanistan's international anti-terrorism partners seriously," the summary said.

Kabul and Islamabad are key players in the United States' "war on terror" launched after the September 11, 2001 attacks blamed on Al-Qaeda, which the Taliban regime allowed to operate in Afghanistan.

But Afghan and Western officials allege that Islamic extremists have sanctuaries in Pakistan which helped to create the Taliban as an armed militia and was one of only three countries that recognised the hardliners' government.

Islamabad officially dropped its support for the Taliban only after the 9/11 attacks but Afghans allege it still wants the new government in Kabul to fail for its own strategic purposes.

The Taliban, who have claimed almost all of a wave of suicide attacks as part of their insurgency, again denied involvement and blamed rivalry among regional powers, including Pakistan.

"We wish we had carried out this attack ... since India has been the enemy of the Islamic Emirate," spokesman Zabihullah Mujahed told AFP, referring to the 1996-2001 Taliban regime.


India had assisted the Northern Alliance, an Afghan faction that fought the Taliban, and was now helping the US-backed government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Mujahed said.

"They send secret military experts to Afghanistan and they train the Afghan army," he said. "Had we carried out the attack, we would have claimed responsibility for it with pride since we have good reasons for it."
Sanjay M
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4892
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 14:57

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Sanjay M »

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/JG09Df02.html
And already there are calls in India for troops to be sent to Afghanistan. An editorial in the influential English daily, India Express, says, "After the Kabul bombing, India must come to terms with an important question that it has avoided debating so far. New Delhi cannot continue to expand its economic and diplomatic activity in Afghanistan, while avoiding a commensurate increase in its military presence there. For too long, New Delhi has deferred to Pakistani and American sensitivities about raising India's strategic profile in Afghanistan."

A military presence in Afghanistan might increase India's profile and add to its stature as a growing power in the region. But it will end up being bracketed with the Americans in Afghanistan, an image it would do well to avoid. It would work against the country's long-term interests in the region, jeopardizing the enormous goodwill it has earned to date.

Troops in Afghanistan would push India into the Afghan quagmire. This might be what the ISI was gunning for when they attacked the Indian embassy on Monday.

Sudha Ramachandran is an independent journalist/researcher based in Bangalore.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by NRao »

Pak, Taliban want India out of Afghanistan

Nice article.

Time for India to double up in A'stan. It has a reason that the rest of the world understands. A wink and a flag to command under is all that is needed. A win-win for the NATO too. The much sought 2nd front?
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by CRamS »

All western reports are looking at this dastardly attack by TSP as some kind of 'rivalry', not an unadulterated evil act by TSP against India's presence. Thus, India not only confronts the Paki/Talib monsters, but western criminal complicity as well. Not easy to win when the decks are so heavily stacked against you. But there is no doubt that both TSP and the US-led western racists are gnawing their teeth in private, knowing fully well that the ordinary Afghans see India's presence as most welcome.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by CRamS »

amit wrote:Tragic as the whole episode is there's something that's playing on my mind.

We are thinking in terms of action-->reaction. With action by the ISI (the blast) and a reaction from RAW (that is need for a just response).

However, given what's happening in Pakistan could it be the other way around? That is this is a reaction from ISI to action from RAW?

Since these matters never come to light, we sometimes give less credit to our folks than is due. Nevetheless a tragic loss for India that should be avenged.

JMT and all disclaimers.
If thats true, it was a deadly revenge attack and a huge victory for ISI. I mean, for sure someone in the Indian security apparatus screwed up for the lax security; this was expected according to Raman. TSP got some of our big guns and caused pain and anguish. Pakis wouldn't give a rats arse for the 40 odd Afghans killed, but sure are rejoicing at the slaughter India's military officers and diplomats. There are two Pakijabis in my office, typical jihadi look alikes, I avoid them like I would rats infested with plauge; and whenever TSP scors a hit against India, be it Jaipur slaughter, or cricket; you see a huge smile on their faces with lot of hush hush talk in the coffee room. I am going to avoid them lest I puke when I see the evil MoFos today.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by NRao »

The US/NATO failures are very well understood. India should make its presence felt under her own flag.

On bracketing with the US, I think it is very good idea - at this point in time. Given that they have failed, therefore any good that comes out of such "bracketing" will be assigned to India!!! Fears of Bangaluru based experts is not very well founded - though it is understandable.

This should also appear on the much talked or thought about Indo-US strategic partnership!! :twisted: (Partnerships are meant to be two way dealings. And, the partner with more experience should lead!!!!! :evil: )

It is my opinion that even a simple act of the US granting India the space to operate would have a decisive impact.
Raju

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Raju »

CRamS wrote:
>>> Not easy to win when the decks are so heavily stacked against you.

this is not surprising at all. It has always been this way.

If one looks at history, the decks have always been heavily stacked against those who are good or dharmic.

But the good fellows always have one ace up their sleeve that the bad boys cannot beat. This has happened throughout the ages.
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by RamaY »

Advance apologies if I am repeating my point....

We need to see what are India's interests in helping Afghanistan -
- A genuine compassion for Afghans' suffering and interest to help that country revive and achieve socio-economic stability
- An effort to deny the strategic-depth that Pakistan is looking for. Thi strategic depth need not be just defence related. A taliban controlling afghanistan will make pakistan extremely valuable in controling access to CAR energy resources by Indian subcontinent. check the maps...
- An effort to squeeze pakistan from both sides.
- Restricting talibans to NWFP/FATA regions thus making paki society to pay the price for its idealogy.

We have multiple players in Afghanistan. Everyone has their own priorities/interests. I dont think anyones interests align with India's more than 20%. 1. Afghan people
2. Warlords
3. Taliban
4. Pakistan
5. USA/NATO
6. Iran
7. Russia
8. China
9. India

So India should make its own decisions in such a way that
A. They align (atleast in shortime) with major military players there, so a quick and decisive security victories are achieved.
B. Bargain deligently to get maximum out of its investments. Ensure that India is not at loggerheads with major players (especially US/NATO and IRAN)
C. Establish long-lasting relationship with the society there. Build Hospitals, Universities, Schools, Dams and fund them on a continuous basis. Bring large contingencies of security (police, military) personal to India to train them.

Is it worth the investment??? Put a value against these items:
> A longterm objective of winning POK from Pakistan
> 40000+ lives lost for terrorism
> 5000+ security personal lost to terrorist activities
> Economic cost of the terrorist attacks (Bombay, Delhi, Jaipur, Hyderabad, Godhra) - Howmuch business India Inc lost due to its low security ratings...
> Economic/Fatigue cost of Indian army presense in JK
> Economic cost of budgetory support to JK state to keep these terrorists happy...
John Snow
BRFite
Posts: 1941
Joined: 03 Feb 2006 00:44

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by John Snow »

Why did the guard at the embassy compound not shoot at the suspect car, as it sped to raming the CC?
Am I missing some thing?

Is ther SOP asking guard to open fire on suspicion, why are the two diplomats sharing the car? Fuel saving or hight cost of Fuel? Some babu instructions?
Were standard precautions taken in checking if the car was being followed or spotters noted?

Sorry I am not a smart person some just Bourne Identity kind novels Jason would have taken.
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by RamaY »

John Snow wrote:Why did the guard at the embassy compound not shoot at the suspect car, as it sped to raming the CC?
Am I missing some thing?

Is ther SOP asking guard to open fire on suspicion, why are the two diplomats sharing the car? Fuel saving or hight cost of Fuel? Some babu instructions?
Were standard precautions taken in checking if the car was being followed or spotters noted?

Sorry I am not a smart person some just Bourne Identity kind novels Jason would have taken.
The bomber rammed a car into two Indian diplomatic vehicles as they entered the gates of the embassy, according to witnesses.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by NRao »

We need to see what are India's interests in helping Afghanistan -
- A genuine compassion for Afghans' suffering and interest to help that country revive and achieve socio-economic stability
- An effort to deny the strategic-depth that Pakistan is looking for. Thi strategic depth need not be just defence related. A taliban controlling afghanistan will make pakistan extremely valuable in controling access to CAR energy resources by Indian subcontinent. check the maps...
- An effort to squeeze pakistan from both sides.
- Restricting talibans to NWFP/FATA regions thus making paki society to pay the price for its idealogy.
- Open a second front (squeeze) with intent to dismember Pakistan (CAR oil via Baluchistan)
- To totally eradicate the concept of Jihadis from Pakistani society?
- To reduce and even perhaps elliminate Chinese influence in that region
- To reclaim Indo-Afghan ties (that predate "Western" existence) (yes, keep western influence out of the region too)
- Put more pressure on reclaiming Tibetian freedom or some form of it
- With lesser Chinese influence in the region, expect lesser Chinese influence in IOR in general
- With greater Indian influence, improve Indian influence in IOR (including Oz)
Raju

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Raju »

RamaY wrote:Advance apologies if I am repeating my point....

We need to see what are India's interests in helping Afghanistan -
- A genuine compassion for Afghans' suffering and interest to help that country revive and achieve socio-economic stability
...
this should be the primary aim. Everything else is secondary.

Everything else will automatically follow with this.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

amit, Your speculating that it was possible tit for tat for something India may or maynot done to TSP is a non sequitor. It provides justification for the terrorist attack. I dont see th point of it except to justify the attackers. Its bad enough that Goi finds Indians and Afghans equally suffering. Atleast lets retain some jiongoness on this board.

I suggest people not post speculative/tit for tat for atleast five days after any terrorist attack. Thanks, ramana
Johann
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2075
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Johann »

Attacks on embassies/consulates and hotels are never *just* symbolic.

Particularly in conflict areas, embassies and consulates are the centre of a state's efforts and presence in that area. Economic and security assistance, technical advisors, intelligence, most of it will operate or be coordinated out of diplomatic facilities.

Terrorist attacks on embassies will not instantly push a committed country out - but by creating a seriously unsafe situation, a mission may be so crippled by the necessary security precautions that their ability to get things done is restricted.

India is just as much of a target in Afghanistan as any NATO country's embassy.

Anyone who doesnt understand that doesnt understand how *total* the jihadi style of warfare is. Why did Zarqawi flatten the UN headquarter in Iraq in 2003? Why are non-Islamist NGOs routinely targeted in any conflict zone?

The convergence between ISI and non-state jihadi interests in attacking the diplomatic facility of *any* country opposing the Taliban's return is high.

But for the Pakistani state, close relations between India and Afghanistan because both states are the only ones who have consistantly had a problem with Pakistan's very existance. Their problem with Pakistan goes well beyond the Taliban or jihadi tanzims.

Spinster,

Good question. Generally security posture is something that is decided at a higher level than the guy manning the barrier.

Issuing live ammunition, and the authorisation and in fact encouragement to security personnel fire on a speeding vehicle has to come from above.

The rules of engagement (and associated training) usually depend on the percieved level of threat. When there are lapses, its usually either because the threat assessment was inadequate, or because not enough was done to bring security procedures in line with the assessment. It usually takes an investigation to figure out which is the case.

A lot of times diplomats in particular dont like tough security postures because it can not only restrict their options, it can actually lead to difficulties with people you want to get along with- for example its not nice to have to tell the Afghan Defence minister whose motorcade speeds everywhere that he has to slow down at your embassy because he might get shot.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

PTI Reports
Zardari condemns terror attack on Indian embassy
Islamabad (PTI): Ruling Pakistan People's Party chief Asif Ali Zardari on Tuesday condemned the "barbaric and cowardly" attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul, saying it was perpetrated by "enemies of peace" who want to destabilise the region.

Zardari's statement came amidst a war of words between Afghanistan and Pakistan over the suicide car bombing that killed 41 people, including two Indian diplomats and two paramilitary troopers on Monday.

The Afghan defence ministry said the bombing could not have succeeded without the support of foreign intelligence agencies, a thinly veiled allegation about Pakistan's involvement.

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, on an official visit to Malaysia, and Rehman Malik, who functions as interior minister, said Pakistan had no hand in the attack. Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi had condemned the bombing yesterday.

In a statement issued by the PPP, Zardari condemned the "barbaric and cowardly" attack, saying it was "perpetrated by the enemies of peace who want to destabilise the region for advancing their own agenda".

The attack "should not deter countries in the region from pursuing their common agenda of peace". "If anything it should further strengthen their resolve to fight terror in all its manifestations and forms," Zardari said.

Zardari expressed the hope that the perpetrators of the crime "will be exposed and duly punished in accordance with the law". He expressed his condolences to the bereaved families and prayed for the early recovery of the injured.
Any quotes from Nawaz Sharif?

Zardari will get one more mark in the ISI/jihadi logbook. Something interesting is going on in TSP and spilling out into the neighborhood.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Pioneer, 8 July 2008
A desperate bid to scare India away

Shobori Ganguli | New Delhi

The deadly terror attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul on Monday is clearly the most chilling instance yet of the severe hostility India faces from a Talibanised Afghanistan and its jittery Pakistani sponsors. With Afghanistan's Interior Ministry asserting that the attack was carried out in "coordination and consultation with active intelligence service in the region," there is reason to believe that Pakistani and Afghan fundamentalists are genuinely worried about the strategic depth India has gained into Afghanistan in the years following the US-led war on terror since 2001.

Undaunted by the attack, the Ministry of External Affairs said, "Such acts of terror will not deter us from fulfilling our commitments to the Government and people of Afghanistan." Admittedly, India's commitment to developing Afghanistan's battered infrastructure may have earned it goodwill among the locals but that goodwill is mainly centred around Kabul and does not reflect the Talibanised mindset of the majority living beyond the capital's limits. That ugly reality reared its head on Monday in the very heart of the Afghan capital.

While all previous attacks on Indians have been carried out in the inclement Afghan heartland ruled by warlords, the bombing of the Indian mission in Kabul is an attempt, albeit desperate, to scare away India from walking that war-ravaged country back to civilised sanity.

Monday's attack was a brazen attempt to weaken India's resolve to help rebuild Afghanistan in a manner that enhances India's strategic stakes in a region long dominated by an India-hostile Pakistan. These stakes were meant to be assiduously bought over a period of seven years starting 2002 through a donor pledge worth US $750 million. To that end thousands of Indians are currently employed in Afghanistan in projects ranging from power and roads to schools and hospitals right down to training Afghan civil servants. Scores of Indians have been also engaged by the Hamid Karzai regime in various development projects of the Afghan Government.

Wreaking havoc at the gates of the Indian mission, therefore, was a ploy to compel India into abandoning a post long occupied by Pakistan. Had this attack been one of its kind it would have been difficult to suggest that India's engagement and growing influence in Afghanistan is disconcerting Pakistan. The sinister opposition to India's involvement in Afghanistan's reconstruction has been evident right from the start, the worst being the kidnapping and subsequent beheading of a BRO driver MR Kutty in 2005 by the Taliban who have been demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Indians from that country.

The Kabul attack is also a grim reminder that India's engagement with Afghanistan's reconstruction and rehabilitation in all these years has failed to dilute the Taliban's and its Pakistani sponsors' visceral hatred of India. It is all the more important therefore that India's commitment does not waver under such attacks.

Prior to this attack in Kabul, the Taliban's focus had been essentially on Indians working on various infrastructure projects. The 400-odd BRO and the 300-odd ITBP personnel India has sent into Afghanistan have been in the Taliban's line of fire constantly because Pakistan is genuinely worried about the 218-kilometre road linking Delaram to Zaranj the BRO is building on Afghanistan's border with Iran. Pakistan views the road as a symbol of its waning influence in Afghanistan, a project that would additionally provide India land access to Iran.

In April this year, two BRO engineers working on this road project were killed in a suicide bombing while two ITBP personnel lost their lives earlier.

In 2003, two Indians working on an American-backed highway project were kidnapped but were fortunately released. However, an Indian working for an Afghan telecom company the same year was not as fortunate and was shot dead. Again in 2006, an Indian national working for a Bahraini company was abducted and beheaded.
Another task is to spread the benefits of Indian assistance through out the land and not just the capital region. maybe the security agencies also should work together?
Avinash R
BRFite
Posts: 1973
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 19:59

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Avinash R »

Diplomat killed in Kabul suicide bombing was an outstanding officer
New Delhi | July 07, 2008 6:09:21 PM IST

India's recently appointed Consul General in Guangzhou, China, Mr. Gautam Bambawale, on Monday described the suicide bomb attack death of his Indian Foreign Service colleague, Mr. V.Venkat Rao, Counsellor (Political) at the Indian Embassy in Kabul, as a personal loss.

Talking to ANI from Guangzhou, Mr. Bambawale, who was posted in Washington from July 2004 to September 2007, fondly remembered Mr. Venkat Rao, an Indian Foreign Service officer of the 1990 batch.

He said: " V.V. Rao worked with me on several postings, including Berlin and Washington, and he was an outstanding officer of a very high calibre.

He further said that his passing in Monday's suicide bomb attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, along with 40 other persons, "was a great loss to the Indian Foreign Service."

Mr.Bambawale described V.V.Rao as an "extremely popular officer during his posting in Washington D.C., where he interacted very well with everyone as the First Secretary (Political).

Bambawale, who was the Minister for Political Affairs and head of the political wing at the Indian embassy in Washington D.C. took charge of the new Indian Consulate in Guangzhou, China, in October last year It was formally inaugurated in May 2008 by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee during his three-day visit to China.

The opening of the Consulates in Guangzhou and Kolkata follows an agreement between New Delhi and Beijing inked more than two years ago.

Bambawale is one of the most fluent speakers of Mandarin in the Indian Foreign Service, and has already served three terms in China -- in Hong Kong between 1985 and 1988; at the Embassy in Beijing between 1988 and 1991; and then again in Beijing between 1998 and 2001, during which he served as the Deputy Chief of Mission. In between these stints, Bambawale served as Under Secretary on the China Desk at the Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi in 1991.

Besides his expertise on China, Bambawale is also a specialist in US-India affairs having served as the Deputy Secretary (Americas) at the MEA headquarters in 1992-94 and as Minister (Political) at the Indian embassy in Washington between 2004 and 2007.

Bambawale is an alumnus of the prestigious Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, and joined the Indian Foreign Service in 1984.
Link
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by NRao »

Another task is to spread the benefits of Indian assistance through out the land and not just the capital region.
Roads where needed, goats and cattle for the rest ....... if I had a say.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Prem »

The war will go on till the ideological base of Bakistan is extinguished . The sacrifice of good people lost in the blast should not be forgotten.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by vsudhir »

Would be nice if a road, a street, a hospital or a school were named in honor of these unsung heroes who've given the supremem scarifice in the line of duty. Preferably in the vicinity of their homes. A plaque explaining the service and sacrifice made would be a bonus.

Let schoolkids and common folk see, know and hopefully become inspired (even 1% becoming inspired is a huge bonus).

Small steps taken together lead to big results.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Embassy bombing hardens Afghan mistrust of Pakistan

I don't see this as a rogue ISI operation. I think it had the sanction of the authorities in TSP as the fallout is quite severe. So why did they allow it? Is it Zardaris' overture to the ISI types?
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by CRamS »

For those who watch, I forgot to ask, but how are Bhraka baby and Karan thappad covering this gory slaughter by their TSP mentors? I am sure Karan Thappad's coverage will center on agrressively, with as much gumption as he can muster, with all theatrics, pounce on Indian govt officials as to why such agrressive moves by India to stay in Afganisthan when TSP/Talibs don't like it and how this is vitiating the 'piss process'. While Bharka will talk about 'extremists on both sides' and how much TSPians love India but for India's hegemonic attitude. Recall, Bharka had the gall to suggest that her Muslim brethren in the valley actually love the Amarnath pilgrims and this piddly little land transfer 'hurts' their sentimes and spreads communal poison. The art of telling bold-faced lies without do so directly.
Nandan D
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 45
Joined: 19 Jul 2001 11:31
Location: Austin, Tx

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Nandan D »

What the indian government should do, is to immedialtely declare that they are doubling their aid to Afghanistan...
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by NRao »

Better still help A'stan build a all weather 8 laned road to Pakistan border.

To "rescue" Pashtuns across the border. Of course.

And, since there is too much terrorist activity, India will send a few to protect those building the road.

Perhaps even long range artilary and if the situation goes bad, then IAF enter the picture.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Pakistan's proxy war

Ashok Mehta

For the country, and the Congress-led Government especially, it was a Black Monday: Its Government in Jammu & Kashmir fell; the Left withdrew its support; it lost a few legislators in Karnataka to the BJP; and horror of horrors, Pakistan formalised its proxy war against India in Afghanistan through a suicide attack targetting the Indian Embassy in Kabul. The car bomb suicide attack, the deadliest in Kabul since 9/11, marks the culmination of the decade-long India-Pakistan covert pincer war in Afghanistan. The Pakistan ISI-sponsored strike is the clearest signal that the gloves are off: Islamabad is reasserting the concept of strategic depth in Afghanistan and challenging interloper Delhi's foray into its legitimate sphere of influence.

After the dismantling of the Taliban regime in Kabul, Pakistan has constantly feared encirclement by India especially after the Indian Air Force's new air base at Farkhor in Tajikistan and through its soft power: Economic and humanitarian aid which has made a profound impression on Afghans. If the theory of strategic encirclement is a viable one, India deserves credit for it given it does not have contiguous borders with Afghanistan. India's strategic objectives in Afghanistan are best met with a pro-India Government in Kabul keeping an eye on Pakistan and access to resource-rich Central Asia.

Islamabad's notion of strategic depth in Afghanistan is a keenly debated subject in Pakistan. Some experts, including former Army Chief Gen Jehangir Karamat, say it is an outdated concept, a relic of the Cold War. Others, including the new Government, disagree. It has, therefore, reinvented a more aggressive version of countering India's growing influence in Afghanistan which it believes has been encouraged by the Karzai Government to balance Pakistan.

The Indian presence in Afghanistan, through its old and new Consulates at Herat, Mazar-e-Sharif, Jalalabad and Kandahar, has stoked Pakistan's fears that India's R&AW had set up these outposts, especially the last two, bordering Pakistan for running covert operations against Islamabad. It has alleged that R&AW is assisting the Baluchistan Liberation Army with arms and funds to foment the ongoing insurgency.

The logic and framework of the India-Pakistan confrontation in Afghanistan is contained in a recent report published by the US Centre for Strategic and International Studies, titled India and Pakistan in Afghanistan: Hostile Sports. Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have never been worse than now with Kabul accusing Islamabad of cross-border terrorism in the same tune as Delhi has been doing for decades. That makes both India and Afghanistan victims of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.

It is not just in Afghanistan where Pakistan is seeking strategic depth but also in Jammu & Kashmir, though the strategic focus has shifted from east to west with nearly 100,000 troops deployed on the Pakistan-Afghan border. Bulk of these forces were moved under US persuasion after 9/11 and included key strategic reserves earmarked against India. One of the reasons the Pakistan Army is reluctant to fight the terror war in the west is to regain the operational balance against Indian forces in the east.

Another reason is to take the heat of the suicide attacks off Pakistan and transfer it to Afghanistan. That is the rationale of the peace deals with the old and new Taliban. That the stage for the new proxy war between India and Pakistan is to be Afghanistan is confirmed by the Rand Corporation's new report by Seth Jones, Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. He makes the assertive claim that ISI and Frontier Corps are aiding the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan with the primary aim of balancing India.

The suicide attack, taking out the defence attaché , the political counsellor and ITBP guards comes after three successful strikes against Border Roads Organisation personnel this year in north-west Afghanistan. The direct assault on the Indian Embassy was expected any time now. It represents a big blow to Western efforts to cobble together modest means of cooperation between India and Pakistan rather than outright confrontation in Afghanistan.

The India-Pakistan Joint Anti Terror Mechanism, which has made no breakthrough in providing clues to any of the recent terror attacks, could now break down. As the convener of the India-Pakistan Track II, I have been trying for the last two years without any modicum of success to keep the JATM afloat while urging retired Pakistani Generals and scholars on the seminar circuit to look beyond the fatigued notion of strategic depth. We had agreed to include cooperation in Afghanistan as the ninth item on the India-Pakistan composite dialogue and were also exploring other options for cooperation under the SAARC charter.

As all three countries were victims of terrorism, besides the bilateral JATMs, a trilateral framework could be examined, it was agreed. Despite Afghan requests through the Jirgah, Pakistan has stubbornly refused to provide India with a trade transit corridor. Islamabad fears that better and cheaper Indian goods would outclass its products. Pakistan feels that India, through its $ 800 million bilateral aid programme - the fifth largest - has reduced Islamabad to a fringe player in Afghanistan.

About 4,000 Indians are working in Afghanistan on projects which also involve 25 private companies. The thrust areas are infrastructure development, humanitarian assistance and institutional and human resource development. The reconstruction projects are chosen by the Afghan Government. Nearly 600 ITBP and CISF personnel are deployed for the security of these projects. In view of the latest suicide attack, both the security structures and surveillance will have to be strengthened.

June was the bloodiest month in Afghanistan since the war on terror began in 2001. Even Iraq was tame by comparison. Most worrying is the path of the suicide bomber which is moving from Baghdad to Kabul to Islamabad with deadly lethality. The first suicide attack in Afghanistan was in 2004 and altogether four that year. Next year, the number increased to 17. In 2006 and 2007, the figure catapulted to 123 and 117. This year, already the tally is 66, not to mention the nearly 100 attacks in Pakistan last year.

The suicide scenario is chilling as there is no antidote to those willing to die. India has so far not fallen on the jihadi suicide path, but the suicide bomber has reached our doorstep. The diplomatic mask is likely to fall in the run up to the Assembly election in Jammu & Kashmir later this year. Our intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies have to brace up for the new war which must be fought in Afghanistan - and if necessary in Pakistan. If the terrorist threat emanating from Pakistan is not met collectively by the three SAARC countries, it will have to be fought on India's terms.
A few questions. So Track II was flourishing and had suggested a trilateral body as bilateral were failing. Looks like this is a response to the idea of tri-lateral body.

Also does the West provide intellectual justification for TSP with its numerous studies or does it just document the angst inside TSP? Either way an indicator seems to be the appearance of a new study from the Western experts!

Is the last para a forebodying of things to come or a threat?

And this op-ed confirms to me its a official TSP action and not a rogue one as the Indian press is trying deperately to portray.
Ananth
BRFite
Posts: 346
Joined: 16 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Ananth »

ramana wrote: And Ananth now do you see the ISI link or do you think its still generic?
ISI is still faceless for me. Is it the NGO within ISI or some other faction within ISI who is doing this? Who are the actors who are forcing the Pakistani hand? We just cannot say ISI since that is the part of the TSP establishment. How is this going to be beneficial to TSP establishment when India can not only turn up the heat on the East but also on west and south?

The point is TSP's and ISI's signature was evident but who within. By who I am interested in which factions? To add fuel to the conspiracy theorists, it would not be too far fetched to presume that unkil is kind of satisfied if not disinterested by this op. Increased military presence by India might take some burden off NATO/US alliance which helps them. The media reports we are seeing are nowhere hyperventilating on Cashmere etc and are suggestively encouraging rage in India. However the probability of this scenario is low, but not insignificant.

If the whole TSP establishment was in it then why would it try to make its life difficult and increase the number of fronts on which it is trying to fight. One calculation could be with the coming elections in JK, they would want little turbulence over there. It would be good for them if India breaks the ceasefire and retaliates in the east. But why would India do it when we have so many other options in different areas and so many on-call mercernaries for available? So nothing much to gain on JK. Moreover, they would get more bang for a suicide bomber by execting the op in JK rather than AF.

The TSP est. is not happy with Zeranj-Delaram road link. They have expressed their unhappiness by killing our BRO men. But that has not halted the construction. They have expressed unhappiness with consulated on Durand line. Then they could have conducted a major op against those consulates rather than Kabul. What will be the effect of this op? India will take the loss, increase the security and will continue with its work. We are not in AF to kill TSPians and we wont. The road is about to open up this winter or early next year. The only way TSP could stop the work is to destabilize the region from where the road goes. But we don't see any of this.

If I were to assume that the whole TSP est. is involved then this act seems more like a parting shot from an about to be defeated boxer. It will increase the cost of our presence but we can also increase their business losses by diverting more traffic through Iran. What happens to their logistical control of drug routes? Is that why mullah omar is too silent on the road? It definitely gives him options with respect to TSPA.

Hnair's assessment that TSPA is using the shikandi civilian government is more appropriate. But I would qualify it as an ISI faction which is trying to do it.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Its the TSPA that has factions. The ISI is all jihadi. Anyway you are welcome to your views as I am.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Gerard »

Pakistan feels that India, through its $ 800 million bilateral aid programme - the fifth largest - has reduced Islamabad to a fringe player in Afghanistan.
But there is equal=equal
All Pakistan has to do is match Indian funding...
It has pledged about US$750 million to Afghanistan's reconstruction since 2002 and is today the fifth-largest bilateral donor in Afghanistan after the United States, Britain, Japan and Germany. This places India among the big players in the country.

India is involved in an array of projects, ranging from providing food to children to improving infrastructure. It is constructing the 218-kilometer Zaranj-Delaram road, the Afghan parliament and a power transmission line from Pul-e-Khumri to Kabul and a substation in Kabul. It is repairing and reconstructing the Salma Dam in the western province of Herat at a cost of $109.3 million and building telephone exchanges linking 11 provinces to Kabul. It has supplied hundreds of buses and mini-buses. India is training bureaucrats and is providing over 3,000 Afghans with skills to earn a livelihood in carpentry, plumbing and masonry.

Hundreds of Afghans have been given scholarships to study in India. India is providing food assistance in the form of high-protein biscuits to 1.4 million school children daily.

"India's reconstruction strategy was designed to win over every sector of Afghan society, give India a high profile with Afghans, gain the maximum political advantage and, of course, undercut Pakistani influence," the BBC quoted analyst Ahmed Rashid as saying,
Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7794
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Prasad »

@Ananth, Ramana et al,

For the lay person in India, the ISI is an all-powerful evil agency which can hit any part of the country through its terrorists. But what exactly is the ISI made up of? Who heads it? Where do those scum originate from? Would it be possible for us to execute covert operations against them? If they can track our diplomats and defence personnel we should be able to do the same about people within pukistan.

Granted, it might be construed as overt war but we're already in it figuratively and we always have the option of having our PM cry that our brothers across the border are as much victims of terror as we are to ensure deniability.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Meanwhile Pioneer reports, 9 July 2008
Kabul victims Brig Mehta, Rao cremated

Pioneer News Service | New Delhi/ Hyderabad

The body of Brig Ravi Datt Mehta, India's Defence Attache in Afghanistan who was killed in the dastardly Kabul suicide bomb attack on the Indian Embassy on Monday along with IFS officer VV Rao, and two other Indians, were cremated here on Tuesday.

Despite a drizzle, Indian Army chief General Deepak Kapoor led mourners and wreaths were placed on behalf of the President of India, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and Defence Minister AK Antony.

Senior IFS officer Rao, was also cremated at the same site at Brar Square cemetery in the Delhi Cantonment later in the day.

Heartrending scenes were witnessed at the cremation when Rao's 11-year-old son Karthick broke down while performing the last rites. The class VIII student wept inconsolably as he came forward to lit his father's funeral pyre. Tears gushed down his face even as his uncle, relatives and his father's colleagues tried to console him saying that his father "had laid down his life for the nation".

Rao's wife Malathi, a special instructor at a Sanskrit School in the Capital, and her daughter Amulya, a school student, also had their eyes wet throughout the hour-long funeral ceremony held at Brar Square cemetery at the Cantonement.

Recalling his association with Mehta when he was heading the Udhampur-based Northern Command, Army chief told his grieving family, "We bid farewell to a fine soldier".

Wife of the slain Brigadier, Sunita, and the children, Udit and Bhawiya, close relatives and associates of Mehta in the Army, though grief-stricken, maintained their poise at the funeral, as Udit, a flight lieutenant posted at Jodhpur, lit the pyre.

Men of the Rajputana Rifles gave a 21-gun salute as bugles sounded the last post as Udit Mehta performed the last rites.

Earlier, Army officers handed over the Tricolour used for draping Mehta's coffin and his uniform to Sunita as a mark of respect to the gallant officer.

Udit Mehta later told mediapersons that his father had been his hero all along and would continue to remain one.

"My dad made the country proud. Rather than remember the end, I would remember him for how he lived," Udit said.

Meanwhile, Chief Minister Prem Kumar Dhumal announced in Shimla that the State Government would honour Himachal-born Brigadier Mehta and ITBP soldier Roop Singh, who were among the two ITBP jawans who died in the bomb blast, reports PTI.

Dhumal said the State Government had great respect for Defence personnel and always worked for their welfare.

Brigadier Mehta was born in Kelyston estate, Bhrari, in Shimla. His father Shiv Dutt Mehta is a retired Himachal administrative service officer.

Roop Singh hailed from Dhaban village of Mandi district. His body was brought to his village on Tuesday and cremated in the village. He is survived by a son, a student of class VIII, a daughter who studies in class VI and wife Neera Devi (33).

Meanwhile, the death of Rao in the suicide attack in Kabul has left his home State Andhra Pradesh shocked and grief-stricken.

The news came as a bolt from the blue for his elderly parents in the coastal district of East Godavari. V Appalacharyulu (65) and Subhadramma (60) received the news of their eldest son's tragic death from their grand-daughter 11-year-old Amulya in New Delhi.

The parents, who were numbed by the news, left for New Delhi on Tuesday to attend the funeral. They were keenly waiting for their son's arrival next month to celebrate his 45th birthday. "He had promised to celebrate the birthday with us and take us to Delhi," a grief stricken Appalacharyulu told mediapersons before leaving Hyderabad for New Delhi.

"Our son was insisting for quite some time that we should move to Delhi and live with his wife and two children. But we were reluctant to move out of our hometown," said Subhadramma, who lives with her husband in a housing colony, five kms away from Rajahmundry town.
Sorry to hear all this. We need more details of the other ITBP person who was killed.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Warning. Very heart rending for the young boy.

Rao and Mehta cremated
Wish we could do something for the families.
putnanja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4680
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by putnanja »

Making the water boil in Afghanistan
Making the water boil in Afghanistan

Praveen Swami

Was the attack on the Indian mission in Kabul a one-off terror attack, or part of a calibrated Pakistani strategy?

“The water in Afghanistan,” Pakistan President General Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq told his spymaster Lieutenant-General Akhtar Abdul Rehman Khan in December 1979, “must boil at the right temperature.”

Ever since a car bomb ripped through the Indian mission in Kabul on Monday, India’s National Security Adviser, M.K. Narayanan, as well as top officials of the Research and Analysis Wing, the Intelligence Bureau and the Ministry of External Affairs, have all been focussed on just one question: was the attack a one-off strike by Islamist terror groups, or part of a focussed operation by Pakistan’s covert services to make the water in Afghanistan too hot for India to swim in?

Even though the Indian government has chosen not to point fingers in the wake of Monday’s bombing, Afghanistan has made clear that it sees no point in being coy. Its Interior Ministry has issued an official statement saying “this attack was carried out in coordination and consultation with an active intelligence service in the region.” Given that Afghanistan’s covert service, the Riyast-i-Amniyat-i-Milli, has produced dossier after dossier holding Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate responsible for a string of recent terror bombings, there is little doubt just who the unnamed intelligence service might be.

How plausible are these allegations?
Historical context

Answers lie in the quiet war India and Pakistan are waging in Afghanistan. Several commentators have suggested that India’s role in Afghanistan has something to do with its evolving strategic relationship with the United States. On point of fact, this assertion is ill-founded. From Afghanistan’s independence until the triumph of the Pakistan-backed mujahideen in 1992, New Delhi backed whoever was in power in Kabul.

India’s motives were simple. Ever since 1947, Pakistan had waged what Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru called “an informal war” to seize Jammu and Kashmir. By supporting Pakistan’s Afghan adversaries, India was returning the compliment.

Pakistan feared Kabul’s claims to represent all ethnic-Pashtuns. Afghanistan rejected the Durand Line, the colonial-era border that divides the Pashtun tribes. In 1973, Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto even dismissed the government of Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province on charges of conspiring to create Pakhtunkhwa, a united homeland for the tribes. Bhutto claimed the plot had the backing of Mohammad Daud Khan’s pro-Soviet Union regime in Afghanistan.

Islamabad, for its part, backed not a few plots of its own. Its covert services cultivated Islamists exiled by the Daud government, using religion to combat Pashtun nationalism. In July 1975, the ISI financed an attempted coup led by the future mujahideen leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Even the 1992 mujahideen capture of Kabul did not fundamentally alter India’s strategic objectives in Afghanistan. Internal fighting between Hekmatyar and other mujahideen groups soon led to a situation where New Delhi was backing one or the other faction which found itself in opposition to Pakistan.

It was only with the rise of the Taliban that India, for the first time in the history of Afghanistan, found itself supporting an opposition group — the Northern Alliance led by Ahmad Shah Massoud. In 1996-1997, RAW initiated negotiations for the use of the Farkhor military airbase, 130 kilometres south-east of Tajikistan’s capital, Dushanbe. India operated a small military hospital at Farkhor but also used the base to ship high-altitude warfare supplies to the Northern Alliance, service the group’s Soviet Union-built MI-17 and MI-38 helicopters, and execute electronic intelligence-gathering operations.

RAW’s investments in supporting the Northern Alliance paid off. India’s political influence and intelligence capabilities grew significantly. For example, RAW is thought to have become the first intelligence service to have detected the so-called “Airlift of Evil” —the U.S.-sanctioned Pakistani evacuation of the Taliban and the al-Qaeda from the city of Kunduz in November 2002.

Not surprisingly, the annihilation of the Taliban after September 11, 2001, radically shifted the balance of power in Afghanistan in India’s favour. Indian consulates sprouted across Afghanistan, the vanguard of a massive aid and reconstruction programme that is still under way. It terrified Pakistan’s security establishment, which — correctly — saw India as a growing threat to its long-standing position as final arbiter of power in Afghanistan.

In July 2003, Islamabad officially expressed concern about Indian activities along Afghanistan’s border with Pakistan. Allegations followed that India was printing fake Pakistani currency in Afghanistan, to fund cross-border terror strikes. Pakistani newspapers quoted officials as claiming that India’s consulates in Jalalabad and Kandahar were supplying cash and weapons to terrorists in south Waziristan. India was also accused of inciting Nangrahar province warlord Hazrat Ali to shell Pakistani forward positions in the Mohmand Agency. Soon after, Pakistan also accused India of running terror networks out of several Afghan military bases, including Qushila Jadid, north of Kabul; near Gereshk, in southern Helmand province; in the Panjshir Valley, northeast of Kabul; and at Kahak and Hassan Killie in western Nimruz.

Weeks after these allegations surfaced, India’s new consulate in Jalalabad came under grenade attack. Although no lives were lost in the September 1, 2003 strikes, India correctly understood them as a warning. Afghanistan investigators later arrested seven local residents for their role in the attack. They are believed to have confessed that they carried out the strikes on orders from intelligence handlers in Pakistan.

As the Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti-led Baloch insurgency against Pakistan escalated from 2004, Islamabad’s allegations grew more strident. In August 2004, Balochistan Chief Minister Jam Mohammad Yusuf declared that India was running 40 terror camps targeting the province — this after months of claims that the Baloch Liberation Army did not exist! At the beginning of July 2006, Mushahid Husain, the chair of the Pakistan Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, asserted that RAW was “training 600 Balochis in Afghanistan.” He charged India with “propping up the Baloch war” and lashed out at the Riyast-i-Amniyat-i-Milli and the Afghan border police for liaising with RAW.

Were these charges true? It is hard to say. Credible allegations exist that India offered low-grade funding for Baloch insurgents in the wake of the 1971 Bangladesh war of liberation — but then withdrew support to avoid destabilising Prime Minister Bhutto. It is probable, though not proved, that India also held out some financial support to Bugti and other Baloch nationalist leaders.

Having said that, such support could have been provided whether or not India was in Afghanistan — and some of Pakistan’s allegations have been farcical. Senator Hussain, for example, charged India with building up a military presence in Afghanistan. Just why Hussain was so alarmed by the presence of what he himself admitted was a “company strength” presence of Indo-Tibetan Border Police Guards — assigned to Afghanistan after the killing of an India road-construction engineer in November 2005 by the Taliban — is unclear. Some Pakistani newspapers have also reported that India has decided to send peacekeepers to Afghanistan at the behest of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. In fact, both the U.S. and the United Kingdom, ever-sensitive to actions which might hurt Pakistan, have been pressuring India to scale down its diplomatic presence in Afghanistan — let alone sending troops there.
‘Proxy war’

As the French scholar-diplomat Frederic Grare has pointed out, India and Pakistan are “fighting an emerging proxy-war in still war-torn Afghanistan.” “The real question,” he suggested in a paper for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, “is not whether it is happening but its actually intensity.” Grare argued that while there is “little doubt that India has a strong intelligence presence in Afghanistan, this does not necessarily mean it is conducting special operations. But even if it does so, are they militarily significant? The local situation in both Waziristan and Balochistan has been such that Pakistan would have been in trouble in the two areas, irrespective of whether India engaged actively in subversive operations in these regions.”

From the point of view of Pakistan’s covert services, though, time is running out. Despite the revival of its Islamist allies in Afghanistan, Pakistan is more estranged from the country’s political elite and its people than at any time in the past.

At the same time, India has succeeded in consolidating its presence. Farkhor, India’s only military base outside its territory, is thought to have been in a state of full operational readiness since last year, offering New Delhi’s armed forces unprecedented strategic reach. Afghanistan’s membership of the South Asia Free Trade Agreement will strengthen its trade ties with India, which is now the largest regional donor to that country’s reconstruction programme.

India has helped to rebuild roads — including the crucial Kandahar-Iran highway that will relieve Afghanistan of its dependence on Pakistan — airlines, and power plants, and provides support to the health and education sectors. Afghan civil servants, diplomats, and police officials are being trained by India and its elected representatives meet in a building India helped to construct.

In coming weeks and months, Afghan investigators — and India’s covert services —should have a clearer idea of just who carried out the bombings. If the ISI does turn out to have had a role in the enterprise, it is probable that more attacks on Indian targets in Afghanistan will follow. In that event, the question before Indian strategists will be just what New Delhi can do to deter an enterprise intended to deny it the fruits of its hard-won influence in Afghanistan.
Jaspreet
BRFite
Posts: 212
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 02:22
Location: Left of centre

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by Jaspreet »

Originally posted by RaviBg in another thread.
Alert ITBP guards prevented bomber from storming Embassy building
New Delhi, July 8: Had the two ITBP guards not hesitated in lifting the anti-bomb hexa-barrier at the Indian Embassy in Kabul on Monday, there is evidence to suggest that the suicide bomber would have managed to ram the RDX-laden car into the embassy building — a repeat of the 1983 bombing of the US Marines barracks in Beirut.


The Indian Express has learnt that embassy officials told a visiting security team, led by External Affairs Secretary Nalin Surie, that the target of the massive bomb attack was the embassy and not the two officials who were killed in the explosion. The Land Rover, carrying Counsellor V Venkates-wara Rao and Defence Attache Brigadier R D Mehta, was the first vehicle to drive up to the embassy on Monday morning. Seventeen other officials inside the embassy at that time had earlier walked to work.

Sources said that ITBP guards Ajai Pathania and Roop Singh hesitated in lifting the barrier after spotting another vehicle directly behind the Land Rover. Mehta was in the front seat on the right while Rao was seated behind the driver. The fact that one of the dead ITBP guards was found clutching the barrier suggests that they became suspicious of the tailing car, identified by the Afghan Interior Ministry as a white Toyota Corolla.

According to officials, the car-bomber decided to trigger the explosives as he probably realised that the guards had become suspicious. The device detonated even as the Land Rover inched inside the Embassy.

In the 1983 beirut bombing, an explosive-laden car rammed the US Marines barrack after crashing through the barbed wire fence.

Embassy officials in Kabul are still studying the situation, they believe that the modus operandi was a classic car-bombing technique.

As the team led by Nalin Surie reviewed security at the embassy today, officials said the height of the hexa-barrier had been raised from 5 feet to 8.5 feet after the Afghan government alerted the embassy about a possible attack a fortnight ago. So powerful was the Monday explosion that it left a three metre crater and hurled people and cars within the radius of 20 yards. Even the Air India office was hit and had to be shifted to a nearby street.

The Karzai government today repeated its claim that it suspected the role of a foreign intelligence agency in the bombing, clearly referring to the Pakistani ISI.

“Everything has the hallmark of a particular intelligence agency that has conducted similar terrorist acts inside Afghanistan in the past,” Presidential spokesman Humayun Hamidzada told a news conference in Kabul. “We believe firmly that there is a particular intelligence agency behind it,” said Hamidzada. “I’m not going to name it anymore, I think it’s pretty obvious.”

Afghan analysts say Pakistan is unsettled by the close relations between main rival India and Afghanistan. Pakistan Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani denied his country had any role in the Indian Embassy attack and said Islamabad’s interests were in a stable Afghanistan.

But this Afghan government claim is being backed by some specific evidence with the Project Director of the strategic Zaranj-Delaram road, being built by the Indian Border Roads Organisation. He frequently gets reports about infiltration by suicide bombers at the site.

The embassy staff in Kabul have no plans to abandon their duties in the wake of the bombing. Ambassador Jayant Prasad even asked the non-essential staff if they wished to fly to Delhi in the IL-76 which had flown in the MEA team but none wanted to return.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Good find Ravi. A lot of pieces are falling into place. Good to know folks are mulling things over.

One thing for experts to ponder is that the timing of the attack to coincide with the gates being opened to let the two officers into the embassy compound. Had the attacker made it into the compound the damage would have been more devastating based onthe reports of the sound of the explosion being felt all over Kabul which implies quite a lot of stuff was packed. In all probability the driver of the embassy car saved the embassy from greater damage by getting hit. The videos and eye witness reports (if there are any) could give better inofrmation if the driver took evasive action by blocking the attacker. If the attacker wanted to attack the car only couldnt he have done it in another area of Kabul? I submit it could be an attack on the embassy itself.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Suicide Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul

Post by ramana »

Ravi. Not fair. I came to similar conclusion after thinking things over as to why only the two officials car was hit.

:)
Locked