Raghavendra wrote:Wow, thapar,n.ram and all communist nazis being called dhimmis. Once I got a warning from shiv saar for calling a dhimmi a dhimmi in my previous janma. Atlast something radically has changed in here that people are willing to call people for what they really are.
I will make another statement that again may not be liked.
Islam cannot be reformed. The only way to end terrorism is by declaring islam a criminal religion and asking muslims to quit islam or be ready to be treated as criminals.
If i as a person asked all people here to practise peadophilia,murder all homosexuals,rape all women not covered up in an tent, declare me as their prophet or get killed, pay jizya and live like a sub-human being then i would have been called a peadophile,muderer,religious bigot and all other adjectives that are in english.
But the same people are not ready to call mohammed for what he is really was. Until people start using words that fit the character of mohammed and islam then no progress can be made in the fight against terrorism also known as islam.
Raghavendra,
Islam cannot be reformed does not mean that others are to reform it. It means the instrument of 'ijtihad' is no longer valid in Sunni Islam and hence they cannot use this instrument.
However, the fact that ijtihad is no longer operable is no licence for you, if I may suggest, to use terms that are not quite in order or would not be appreciated in an open forum.
May I request you to take a hold of yourself and do be good enough to use syntax that are acceptable to general society, while yet expressing your considered opinion that are not needlessly inflammatory in syntax?
True..Islam cannot be reformed or rather muslims will not permit any reform, they are still in the dark ages..
Rupesh,
May I suggest that you understand Islam before stating that 'moslems will not permit any reform'.
Ijtihad is no longer operable and hence they cannot change. As simple as that.