Search found 101 matches
- 19 Jun 2007 20:17
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
The Kalashnikov round is 7.62x39mm, the NATO standard is 7.62x54mm. There is no way you can fit either round into a gun-chamber designed for another. Yes, the AK very much takes the 7.62x39mm rounds... its the only round it takes in fact. Just adding a footnote to ParGha's detailed reply... Even wi...
- 19 Jun 2007 18:00
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
- 18 Jun 2007 19:45
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
To be sure, I have not understood what is the issue on the rate of fire. A higher rate of fire would mean that replenishment will have to be made faster. This would mean that ammunition must be readily available as also well stocked. Being well stocked will mean a large volume of movement in the lo...
- 18 Jun 2007 15:51
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
Not really. I don't know of a single good soldier that wouldn't do exactly what i've said. The only reasons I can think of for holding down the trigger longer than 3-5 rounds would be against a human wave attack, a limited high rate of fire suppression bursts (~10 rounds/burst), or a panic burst in...
- 12 Jun 2007 00:58
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
My limited exposure to DRDO - technical area beyond office - too secretive -making any kind useful exchange of information which would allow a good system to be developed effectively quickly very very difficult even if you find ways to get past the time wasting procedures ingrained in the system.Wi...
- 11 Jun 2007 22:29
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
- 07 Jun 2007 14:13
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
- 06 Jun 2007 17:57
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Power Sector
- Replies: 1712
- Views: 498208
Basically Doosan had a lead time of 8 months and scope cost of 8000+ crore or so while Bhel's number for Sasan was 11,500+ crore with a 2 Year. :roll: lead time. While there's certainly scope for BHEL to improve, note that Doosan Heavy is a much larger, and more vertically integrated company than B...
- 05 Jun 2007 14:54
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
- 04 Jun 2007 16:52
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
From shyamd's link: ‘Air breathing’ system claims to reduce risk of hearing loss Some of the products used in everyday consumer lives, which have been sourced from defence technology, include readymade chapatis sold by companies such as Godrej Pillsbury and ITC Agro Tech Ltd, and instant rice an...
- 04 Jun 2007 16:40
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 338
- Views: 574567
Does the OFB have an indigenous MANPADS/RPG weapon being developed? As far as I could google,I found that Bharat Dynamics license builds MILAN. Are long range[>> 10 kms] manpads in development? BDL builds Milans and Konkurs. RPG-wise, we do have the 84mm Carl-Gustaf. Questions: - Does BDL make Igla...
- 31 May 2007 19:29
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
- Replies: 2944
- Views: 1088092
- 31 May 2007 19:04
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
- Replies: 2944
- Views: 1088092
Re: we tried
First of all, congratulations of your good workuavindia wrote:we contacted indian army and drdo.
drdo was interested in the start, however, when it was coming to actually giving out money, nothing happened.
If you can share it here, what is your budget estimate ?
- 31 May 2007 18:39
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
Could someone please clarify the IP issues, esp. how HAL/DRDO got around them, in the following sample of projects ? - MiG-27 upgrade - CI-Ajeya upgrade - Tank-Ex - Uprating of T-72 powerpack to 1000HP - BLT, Rajendra, etc on T-72 chassis - BMP-related mods such as Akash/Trishul/Nag Specifically wit...
- 30 May 2007 20:15
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Radar - Specs & Discussions
- Replies: 1148
- Views: 436421
- 30 May 2007 20:11
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Radar - Specs & Discussions
- Replies: 1148
- Views: 436421
I dont think kaveri = reinventing the wheel at all, You see what is Kaveri? a engine, Dont we have talent to make one? We do, So its simple and natural a good project team led by good amount of funds can thousand percent sure finished kaveri within a decade or 15 years. That time is required for an...
- 30 May 2007 15:05
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Indian Agriculture and Agro-based Industry
- Replies: 860
- Views: 413921
A better picture would be gross foodstuffs consumption and caloric intake, not foodgrains alone. Food habits change with development, in particular the consumption of milk, meat and eggs, instead of just a larger portion of rice/dal . Youngsters today are taller and more well built, indicating grea...
- 29 May 2007 19:14
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Radar - Specs & Discussions
- Replies: 1148
- Views: 436421
Re: LCA and MMR
In the context of above post of Kartman: The success and failure are relative as well. That is how you define success and its parameters/components used to measure the success? If functional MMR arives by 2020 and Kaveri gets thurst of 110% by 2020; then although you can claim that project was a su...
- 25 May 2007 21:34
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 288
- Views: 199288
- 25 May 2007 21:06
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Radar - Specs & Discussions
- Replies: 1148
- Views: 436421
definition of failure has a perspective value. you have to define the parameters. imho, kaveri failed to be on LCA by this time is a measurable factor (time issue). having obtained only 80 to 85% of the thust required, does not mean a success (unless the intent is only to achieve that much). callin...
- 25 May 2007 20:55
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Radar - Specs & Discussions
- Replies: 1148
- Views: 436421
We need to define JV clearly. If its not going to be an indigenous effort, why spend money in such a transition. its better to do AESA-MMR. OTOH, if Elta is only just helping us only on a few of the software /hardware critical issues, then we can just pay them consulting fees., and we could proceed...