Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2011

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Suppiah »

I had posted several days ago in WA forum about how Bahraini Sunni regime has been granting citizenship to Pakbaric Sunni fanatic animals in exchange of support and participation in anti-Shia violence. Perhaps Gaddafi has done the same in exchange for naming some stadium in karachi after him!
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by svinayak »

Suppiah wrote:I had posted several days ago in WA forum about how Bahraini Sunni regime has been granting citizenship to Pakbaric Sunni fanatic animals in exchange of support and participation in anti-Shia violence. Perhaps Gaddafi has done the same in exchange for naming some stadium in karachi after him!
VikramS wrote:
It seems even in Bahrien the firing was done by TSP citizens.

Almost two generations and four decades have passed, but killing unarmed civilians seems to be forte of TSP.
The reason is that OIC and Islamic bomb and the Islamic block is based on the dictators supporting Pakistan as the nuclear power. This cascade will change the islamic block like never before.
TSP soldiers are trying to prevent this.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60278
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by ramana »

VikramS I was alluding to this when I asked Shyam to look at things from post WWII. This current architecture was put in place after 1965 and is crumbling. These thugs (Libya et al) funded TSP's bomb and supported them in all the OIC and other forums.

You guys should blog this and spread the message far and wide.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shravan »

Facebook posting: Video clip captures mock suicide missions
PESHAWAR: A young boy dressed in black bids farewell to other children standing in a queue. The boy, around 12 years old, has his face covered with a black cloth. The children standing in the queue appear to be around four to 10 years of age.
...
The video highlights the impact of violence and insurgency on children, and is the first of its kind. It shows that the militancy of the Taliban has scarred the culture of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, going so far as to seep into the games children play with each other.

Video - http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php ... 6&comments
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Anujan »

Apparenly there are no electric locomotives in TSP because all the copper wires got stolen

http://tribune.com.pk/story/124828/paki ... rapped-up/
After increasingly frequent copper theft incidents at various points along the track and on account of lack of funds for replacement of these locomotives, the service was suspended in 2010.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Rangudu »

Anujan

What happened - no email?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

ramana wrote:I got six out of seven on her axis of evil cuisine test!
I got only 5; very interesting though.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Anujan »

Rangudu wrote:Anujan

What happened - no email?
Work pressures, will send you an email soon!
Dilbu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8551
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 22:53
Location: Deep in the badlands of BRFATA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Dilbu »

SSridhar wrote:
ramana wrote:I got six out of seven on her axis of evil cuisine test!
I got only 5; very interesting though.
Where is this?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

Dilbu, it is here
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10205
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by sum »

In total, 851 US nationals are working in Pakistan - 554 diplomats and 297 non-diplomats who enjoy diplomatic immunity. Next comes the British High Commission in Islamabad whose 170 staff members enjoy diplomatic immunity, including 167 diplomats and three others. In its Karachi deputy high commission, seven diplomatic staff enjoyed diplomatic immunity.
870 diplomats in a single country? :eek: :eek: That would be bigger than the entire IFS cadre strength of India..

Does US have those many even within its own country?
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10205
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by sum »

Prem wrote:http://www.time.com/time/world/article/ ... 90,00.html
Davis Spy Crisis: Top U.S., Pakistan Spooks in Talks
What?? No word on evil India or J&K as the root cause of all friction in the entire article? :(( :((
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by ArmenT »

VikramS wrote:asprinzel ji:

It seems even in Bahrien the firing was done by TSP citizens.

Almost two generations and four decades have passed, but killing unarmed civilians seems to be forte of TSP.

Jo Dhaka main war-criminal, woh Libya main bhee
Saar, you forgot to include the stuff that ol' Zia-ul-Haq pulled in Jordan in 1970. Yep, Pakis managed to kill more Palestinians in one month than IDF could do in 20 years or so. That's why older generation Palis are not fans of Pakis at all.
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by ArmenT »

Anujan wrote:Apparenly there are no electric locomotives in TSP because all the copper wires got stolen

http://tribune.com.pk/story/124828/paki ... rapped-up/
After increasingly frequent copper theft incidents at various points along the track and on account of lack of funds for replacement of these locomotives, the service was suspended in 2010.
I'm guessing that the reason for frequent copper thefts is because of lack of electricity. Abdul sees the power go out and shimmies up the nearest pole and cuts a length of wire off.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

ArmenT wrote:Yep, Pakis managed to kill more Palestinians in one month than IDF could do in 20 years or so. That's why older generation Palis are not fans of Pakis at all.
The terrorist organization 'Black September' was created as a result by the Palestenians.

Brig. Zia-ul-Haq massacred thousands of Palestenians in camps at Irbid, Salt, Sweileh,Baq'aa, Wehdat and Zarqa. As The Jordanian King decorated Brig. Zia with the highest medal of ‘Order of Valiance’, the Palestenians equated him with the Israeli General Ariel Sharon. So much for this ummah nonsense by Pakistan. Anyway, that was not the first or the last time that Pakistan betrayed the ummah-nonsense cause.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

Anujan wrote:Apparently there are no electric locomotives in TSP . . .
There are many such factoids. There are no cinemas in Islamabad, there can be no mannequins in shops in most cities & towns of Pakistan, there is no music department in the Punjab Uiversity because of JI diktat, a local magistrate’s no-objection certificate must be obtained prior to hosting a dance or a drama event anywhere, there are no terrorists in Pakistan etc.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Anujan »

http://tribune.com.pk/story/125046/paki ... -citizens/
Libya unrest: Pakistan ramps up efforts to evacuate citizens
Pakistan embassy officials are working with local authorities in Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt and Turkey to ensure the repatriation, especially of those Pakistanis who were without proper documentation and passports, the statement said.
Mahendra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4416
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 17:20
Location: Chronicling Bakistan's Tryst with Dysentery

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Mahendra »

SSridhar wrote:
Anujan wrote:Apparently there are no electric locomotives in TSP . . .
There are many such factoids. There are no cinemas in Islamabad, there can be no mannequins in shops in most cities & towns of Pakistan, there is no music department in the Punjab Uiversity because of JI diktat, a local magistrate’s no-objection certificate must be obtained prior to hosting a dance or a drama event anywhere, there are no terrorists in Pakistan etc.
And Kasab is not Pakistani
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Suppiah »

From PR electric locomotive report
He said there were a total of 16 electric locomotives parked at the sheds. Thirteen of which, he said, had crashed and three needed to be fixed.
How can a parked locomotive crash? Djinn energy?
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Suppiah »

Story of a Pakbarian barber-ic

http://tribune.com.pk/story/124964/tali ... ut-of-all/
Dilshad describes his life before the brutal Taliban insurgency in Buner as heaven. At the age of 30, he is the father of eight children and was the owner of a well-established salon in the Pir-Abai area of Buner district, an adjacent village to Sultanwas.
Although struck down by paralysis at the age of 15, Dilshad did not lose heart.
He certainly lost neither his heart nor his reproductive energy...BTW have you come across any report, any random report of such interviews with Pakbarian animals where they have less than 5 or 6 children? Practically every Mango Abdul quoted in any media, western or Paki, mention about 6.
asprinzl
BRFite
Posts: 408
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 05:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by asprinzl »

http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_ ... PB6l1QsPro

Libyan soldiers massacred by Paki mercenaries.
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7143
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by JE Menon »

Family planning is an important issue for many developing countries worldwide, including South Asia. In Pakistan, despite a governmental programme supporting family planning and despite the improvements over the last few decades, total fertility rate remains high (4.8 in 2000) and current contraception use remains relatively low (20% in 2000) [1]. In 2004, Pakistan had lower contraception use than most other Muslim countries

http://www.reproductive-health-journal. ... tent/2/1/8
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Hari Seldon »

^^^ The troubling implication is the popn explosion will someday land up at our door.

Packee sense of entitlement that says the world owes them a living is 400% visible in their approach to family planning only. So what if there's no way in heaven that such a popn burden can be supported on available land, food and water resources etc.... The world will take care of them or something.... Am sure the jihad factories also encourage large families so that a few spare sons can be expended in holi war.

I can only hope and pray our gubmint will do the needful when push comes to shove and pak refugees in their millions start streaming across the border escaping uncivil war there. In that sense, Packee propagandu that the evil yindus are only looking for a chance to massacre innocent packees helps postpone this day of reckoning.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by SSridhar »

Suppiah wrote:From PR electric locomotive report
He said there were a total of 16 electric locomotives parked at the sheds. Thirteen of which, he said, had crashed and three needed to be fixed.
Needed to be fixed to do what ? There is no electricity, there is no catenary anyway.
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by arun »

JE Menon wrote:Family planning is an important issue for many developing countries worldwide, including South Asia. In Pakistan, despite a governmental programme supporting family planning and despite the improvements over the last few decades, total fertility rate remains high (4.8 in 2000) and current contraception use remains relatively low (20% in 2000) [1]. In 2004, Pakistan had lower contraception use than most other Muslim countries

http://www.reproductive-health-journal. ... tent/2/1/8
The low level of contraceptive use is certainly going to show up. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan by 2030 “is expected to surpass Indonesia as the country with the single largest Muslim population”:

The Future of the Global Muslim Population

For the population number see here:

Muslim Population by Country
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shravan »

Forty-five arrested for having links with Davis

The individuals had been arrested from Lahore, Karachi and Peshawar and their contact information was taken from Davis’ mobile phone. Investigations were underway.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 883
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by jrjrao »

John Ellis reports about the new arrest in Peshawar:
The arrest of Mr. DeHaven is seen by some in the US intelligence community as the functional equivalent of a hostage taking.
link
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by arun »

Is it appropriate in an “Islamic Republic” and “Ideological Muslim State” for a Minister, the Railway Minister in this case, to hold up kaafir efforts as worthy of emulation?:
“Provide us 400 engines and then if we fail to deliver, I may be subjected to accountability and I shall be ready for the consequences. You expect us to follow the Indians. How can we make railways a profitable entity in the given grim situation? India has invested massively from 1997 to 2005 in the railways and this has enabled it to not only stand on its own feet, but to generate billions of rupees revenue,” he contended.

He pointed out that on the one hand, India had envisaged in the new budget dollar 12.7 billion investment in its railways, while on the other hand, the Government of Pakistan was not prepared to spare a few billions to keep the trains on tracks. He added the Indian Railways would be adding another 68 passenger trains to its massive fleet, which already had 8,300 locomotives at its disposal.

The News
archan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6823
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by archan »

Why do they even compare direct numbers when the difference in population and area is so high. Not to say that the paki railway system is not, well, paki.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 883
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by jrjrao »

Chris Hitchens, as pithily as ever, nails the Pakis.

Our Man in Pakistan --
The dreadful treatment of Raymond Davis is a reminder of how dysfunctional our relationship with Pakistan has become.

http://www.slate.com/id/2286722/
But Pakistan is not a "normal" country. It is a failed and rogue state, where Davis would have had to know that his assailants might very well be working for the forces of law and order. There would be no need for him to be carrying arms if it were not notorious that the Pakistani army and police are the patrons of the Taliban and in league with various criminal and fundamentalist gangs.

Not to mince words, then, Davis is a hostage. In addition to the usual sense of the word, he is a hostage to the Pakistani authorities who dare not—even if they wish—make an enemy either of the Islamist mobs or the uniformed para-state run by the intelligence services. He is also a hostage to the inability or unwillingness of the U.S. government to call things by their right names. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have made the correct noises about the relevant international statutes governing immunity, and their envoy Sen. John Kerry (who should never have been sent unless notified in advance that he would return with the prisoner) has even spoken of putting Davis on trial in the United States, which in ordinary circumstances might seem a little premature. But they all talk as if Pakistan were a country of law, and they all talk as if Pakistan were not a client state. Its client status, indeed, is what leads so many Pakistanis to detest America, without whose largesse and indulgence it would long ago have faced collapse. Thus to the final irony: We are denied leverage by the fact of the very influence for which we are hated.

This sick relationship with Pakistan, which plays a continuous and undisguised double-cross on us in Afghanistan, will probably have to be terminated at some point. But in the meantime, it will have to be made very clear to the rulers of that country that if they want to keep Raymond Davis in prison, they will have to manage without our subsidies. He may be a bad test of an important principle, but it is still the important principle that is being tested, and we have no more right to compromise on the principle of diplomatic immunity than the Pakistanis have to violate it.
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7143
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by JE Menon »

it is a terrible tragedy that hitchens is afflicted by cancer...terminal :(
chaanakya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9513
Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by chaanakya »

Amirkhan bullsht not withstanding , Davis has committed murder on Paki soil. Even if it is argued that he had diplomatic immunity, it could be easily waived for such grave crimes. Self defence is yet to be proved. I have never heard of diplomatic immunity to a spy. This would be first time.

Amirkhans have a tendency to deride other country's legal system and think of their own as above all. And so they are appalled that Pakis, who are living on their doles, have actually the courage and guts to arrest one of the amirkhan's spy and keeping under custody for so long. It is high time that they start learning the realities of the country they operate in and also respect their , howsoever rudimentary , legal system. After all it was their own Chief Justice who withstood the dictator supported by Amirkhan.

Let Paki law take its due course. May be they also apply Sharia in this case. Already they have broken the network operated by Davis to large extent. Good job compare to DCH affair.

Ultimately Davis might be released, I hope, but what is apparent is that Amirkhans life would never be safe in Pak.Davis case is also going to test Paki judiciary and the Govt. Amirkhans would have to think thrice before calli ng any head of ISI or Pak Army etc for testifying in amirkhan court. whether for 26/11 ot 9/11 or any future incidents.

Let us wait and see if Davis is punished or Pakis GUBO before amirkhans losing echendee.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Rangudu »

chaanakya wrote:Amirkhan bullsht not withstanding , Davis has committed murder on Paki soil. Even if it is argued that he had diplomatic immunity, it could be easily waived for such grave crimes. Self defence is yet to be proved. I have never heard of diplomatic immunity to a spy. This would be first time.
Wrong on all counts.

1. Diplomatic immunity, once established, can only be waived by the sending country, grave crimes notwithstanding
2. Spies have diplomatic immunity, if their cover role was declared as a diplomat
putnanja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4728
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by putnanja »

Rangudu, what does the grapevines say about this entire RD affair? any beltway gossip you can share with us? :)
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by abhijitm »

@chanaakya -
I disagree on the ground that pak-us relationship is far different than a country-to-country. First pakistan is not a country, so when we speak of law of pakistan then we should be careful of whether it is a law of taliban or ISI or CJ or Lahore court etc. Pakistan is a client state which survives on US money. They have no choice but to give up RD. Its in his rights whether or not he has a diplomatic cover. This is law of US in a land called pakistan.
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by abhijitm »

archan wrote:Why do they even compare direct numbers when the difference in population and area is so high. Not to say that the paki railway system is not, well, paki.
to match the number they need trains of locomotives; no wagons, only a chain of locomotives running here and there :rotfl:
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by RajeshA »

shravan wrote:Forty-five arrested for having links with Davis

The individuals had been arrested from Lahore, Karachi and Peshawar and their contact information was taken from Davis’ mobile phone. Investigations were underway.
Man, what kind of mobile phone did Davis have? No rm * on his mobile phone? What kind of shit contractors is CIA sending to Pakistan?
chaanakya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9513
Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by chaanakya »

Rangudu wrote: Wrong on all counts.

1. Diplomatic immunity, once established, can only be waived by the sending country, grave crimes notwithstanding
2. Spies have diplomatic immunity, if their cover role was declared as a diplomat
You jumped too soon without reading it properly.

Well I didn't say Pak has to waive Diplomatic immunity. Amirkhan could very well waive it Like it was being asked by UK for an Indian diplomat .
A Diplomat is a diplomat with immunity, whatever he may be doing( spying) otherwise.The case in point is CIA station chief whose cover was blown by ISI and had to leave. He was not prohibited from leaving as he enjoyed Diplomatic immunity. But a spy, who is not diplomat, does not have immunity. That Davis was a diplomat is yet to be established satisfactorily.Let it be established, then the first point would be played out.

Amirkhan is most likely to waive all conditionality of doles and grant $ 3 Bn in exchange for Davis. (Sums may vary). We need to see how it is twisted by army to their advantage as civilian govt would be kicked hard if they appease amirkhas
Last edited by chaanakya on 28 Feb 2011 23:59, edited 1 time in total.
Kati
BRFite
Posts: 1909
Joined: 27 Jun 1999 11:31
Location: The planet Earth

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by Kati »

chaanakya wrote:Amirkhan bullsht not withstanding , Davis has committed murder on Paki soil. Even if it is argued that he had diplomatic immunity, it could be easily waived for such grave crimes. Self defence is yet to be proved. I have never heard of diplomatic immunity to a spy. This would be first time.

Amirkhans have a tendency to deride other country's legal system and think of their own as above all. And so they are appalled that Pakis, who are living on their doles, have actually the courage and guts to arrest one of the amirkhan's spy and keeping under custody for so long. It is high time that they start learning the realities of the country they operate in and also respect their , howsoever rudimentary , legal system. After all it was their own Chief Justice who withstood the dictator supported by Amirkhan.

Let Paki law take its due course. May be they also apply Sharia in this case. Already they have broken the network operated by Davis to large extent. Good job compare to DCH affair.

Ultimately Davis might be released, I hope, but what is apparent is that Amirkhans life would never be safe in Pak.Davis case is also going to test Paki judiciary and the Govt. Amirkhans would have to think thrice before calli ng any head of ISI or Pak Army etc for testifying in amirkhan court. whether for 26/11 ot 9/11 or any future incidents.

Let us wait and see if Davis is punished or Pakis GUBO before amirkhans losing echendee.
Chaanakya,..thanks....irrespective of the int'al laws, Pak needs to be instigated on this issue and and be told to stand up and see eye to eye to unkil.....let them slug it out....and as they keep on doing it, Bharat should watch from the gallery with a grin........

.....
I don't know why BRFites are so hung up in proving that Davis has immunity......deshis should
apply a bit of chankyan chaatnee, and prop up the failed state before unkil before unkil loses it s cool and smash it once and for good......
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Feb. 12, 2

Post by shravan »

Pakistan Tried to Trade CIA Contractor for 'Lady al Qaeda'
According to a senior American administration official and a Pakistani official involved in the negotiations to free CIA contractor Raymond Davis, the Pakistani government proposed trading Davis for Aafia Siddiqui, an MIT-educated Pakistani neuroscientist currently serving 86 years in federal prison for attempted murder.

The offer was immediately dismissed by the U.S. government. "The Pakistanis have raised it," the U.S. official said. "We are not going to pursue it."
Locked