Is it because participants have exhausted all substance in the debate, suddenly now the 'title' is under attack in the 93rd page? If we strip the debate of its emotional content on both sides, would the division of AP be such a disaster? All of us would still be in an Indian state and be citizens of India. We might then live in peace without the rancour between neighbours that is prevalent today?
Let us look at some snippets of history from the not too distant past.
In the combined 'Madras Presidency' as it was known then, the Telugus felt that they got a raw deal. After the creation of the separate state, the average Telugu is now dominated by his own rich and mighty compatriots instead of Tamilians. (Just as the domination by
gora sahebs was replaced by that of the home grown
sahebs after Independence.)
In the erstwhile Orissa state the Telugus were dominant in the state administration and were hated. Now the average Oriya gets to be dominated by his own rich and powerful cousins. People of the border districts of Ganjam in Orissa, Bellary and Tumkur in Karnataka and Hosur in Tamil Nadu have taken the partition in their stride and got on with their lives. There is an occasional whimper that they are being discriminated against; that their language and culture is subsumed and that they are getting a raw deal in welfare.
In the former Bombay Presidency the thrifty Gujaratis were hated by the docile Marathis. Even after the division, businesses in Bombay are still dominated by Gujaratis. A Bal Thackeray might have vented his ire against all South Indians for being dismissed (as a cartoonist) by a Malayalee editor but could do little to curb the shrewd business sense of the Gujarati.
The Bengalis in the North East and Bihar and the Punjabis in Delhi are hated. Before partition of the nation, the Punjabis used to hate the Sindhis for the same reasons. Even today you scratch a Punjabi and he says that if he were to kill a snake or a Sindhi he would rather kill the Sindhi first. The Malayalees have the same feeling for the Tamilians for their domination in public administration in the erstwhile Travencore state. The Tamilians reciprocate in kind and are no less when it comes to '
loving' their Malayalee neighbours. I heard this wry joke from a Tamilian friend:
"Why does a Malayalee cross the road?"
"Siimbly"
"Why does he cross it again?"
"Because he wants to double-cross!"
It may not be a universal feeling that the Tamilians have for the Malayalees but it does give an inkling into hidden rancour.
As some participants in this forum pointed out, Nehru though first was reluctant to the division of the country on linguistic lines as it would retard integration - one should agree with him on this - then vacillated and finally succumbed to the orchestrated, popular demand for the creation of linguistic states. As a result five new states were created.
Once a new state is created, the people of Telangana will soon realise that their dream of milk and honey rivers was just a chimera for the majority except for a few score rich and mighty. The people of the new Andhra state will also realise that the separation against which they prayed and fought is no apocalypse after all and will learn to get on with their lives.